Cognitive Load

The introduction of human-robot collaboration (HRC) in industrial assembly operations is revolutionizing the manufacturing landscape. In this evolving environment, operators are required to seamlessly coordinate their manual tasks with real-time task information and robotic behaviors. These demands fluctuate during operation, yet conventional workload assessments depend on body-worn physiological sensors that complicate practical deployment. Here, we present a vision-based attention--action framework for continuous and interpretable workload-related assessment in HRC assembly. The framework combines RGB-D observations with robot states and calibrated task-related areas to construct a temporally confirmed representation of operator behavior. This representation identifies where task demand is concentrated and explains how it develops when attention and action diverge, the task context changes, or the operator hesitates. We evaluated the framework in a three-level collaborative gearbox assembly experiment with ten participants, using subjective ratings and synchronized physiological signals as independent references. Raw NASA-TLX ratings confirmed increasing perceived workload across conditions, with significant effects on overall workload and its mental and temporal dimensions. The vision-derived HRC-CWL output was significantly associated with ECG-derived features in seven of nine participants with complete correlation data. Synchronized interaction episodes further showed temporal correspondence between detected hesitation and physiological activity. Real-time deployment demonstrated that the framework can operate without requiring operators to wear additional sensors. These findings support HRC-CWL as an interpretable behavioral proxy for cognitive ergonomics analysis and adaptive robot assistance, rather than a direct psychophysiological measure of workload.

Video lectures are valuable educational resources, but their dense and lengthy formats often overwhelm novice learners. This difficulty stems from a fundamental pedagogical mismatch: while videos deliver transient information linearly, human learning requires constructing interconnected cognitive networks, a task that induces severe cognitive overload for novice learners lacking prior domain knowledge. Existing video summarization methods fail to resolve this mismatch, as they primarily produce text-heavy, linear condensations that still demand high cognitive effort. To bridge this gap, we propose KnowVis, a framework that transforms linear video lectures into pedagogically grounded visual narratives. KnowVis first extracts a detailed concept map from multimodal video content to identify important and challenging threshold concepts, then constructs structured knowledge units, and finally synthesizes engaging visual summaries. Alongside the framework, we introduce a curated dataset of 125 educational videos across 10 academic disciplines, paired with 1,079 generated visual summaries. Extensive automated evaluations and a human study demonstrate that, compared to state-of-the-art baselines, KnowVis generates more accurate and clear visuals that successfully reduce cognitive load and significantly improve student learning effectiveness and knowledge retention.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed on mobile devices, making energy efficiency a key deployment constraint, yet the energy impact of prompt design remains underexplored. This paper aims to understand how two prompt properties, cognitive load and phrasing pattern, shape the energy behavior of on-device LLM inference. We conduct a broad empirical study covering prompt properties, datasets, models, and devices, with phase-level profiling that separates prefill and decode energy. We find that cognitive load primarily affects the energy cost per token, while phrasing pattern affects energy largely through token usage. Our energy-quality analysis further shows that prompt design reshapes the attainable frontier differently across models, highlighting the need for model-aware prompt design in energy-efficient on-device LLM inference. Code, datasets, and scripts are available at https://amai-gsu.github.io/PromptProperty/.

Large language models are powerful, but their interfaces often devolve into a type $\rightarrow$ read $\rightarrow$ retype loop, creating conversational AI fatigue, cognitive load, and eventual task abandonment. To mitigate this, we present RecalibrateGPT, a system introducing five cross-turn operators (Anchor, Replay, Delta, Scope, and Steer) that each target a distinct fatigue type, recalibrating LLM responses through a structured panel by acting on the full conversation history with a single click. Users invoke these operators through the AssistiveButton in one of three operator palette layouts: Vertical, Arc, or Tablet. We conducted two pilot studies with the same 12 advanced LLM users. An initial formative qualitative study identifies a taxonomy of four fatigue types (retyping, scanning, decision paralysis, and context drift) and derives two design objectives for RecalibrateGPT. A follow-up quantitative evaluation finds it reduces perceived cognitive workload by half (NASA-TLX = 2.7) at high perceived usability (SUS = 86.5), suggesting AI fatigue is not just a model-quality issue but an interaction-flow cost that interfaces can remove.

Intuitive teleoperation interfaces are crucial for the safe and effective operation of robotic manipulators in challenging environments. In the nuclear industry, surface contact tasks such as swab sampling require precise path and force tracking, obstacle avoidance, and sustained operator attention, which conventional joystick interfaces struggle to support effectively. This study designs and evaluates a novel touchscreen teleoperation interface that maps continuous finger movements directly to robotic manipulator motions, provides finer velocity control, and integrates control with visualization, enabling more natural, precise, and intuitive surface interaction than conventional controllers. A comparative user study with 20 participants evaluated task performance and workload using the proposed touchscreen, a conventional joystick, and a single-click autonomous mode. Tasks simulated realistic surface manipulation using a Franka Emika Panda arm, remotely controlled from another country. Kinematic, physiological, and behavioral data were recorded to comprehensively assess task performance, cognitive load, and operator trust across each control condition. Participants completed teleoperation tasks more efficiently and accurately with the touchscreen interface, achieving a 53.5% reduction in completion time (median: 2.50 vs. 5.38 min), higher in-area coverage on the sinusoidal path (90.7% vs. 84.1%), and lower overshoot on both path geometries compared with the joystick. Cognitive load, quantified via NASA-TLX (0-100), decreased from joystick to touchscreen (mean TLX 52 to 43; -9 points, -17.3%) and was lowest under the autonomous one-click mode (31; -21 points vs. joystick, -40.4%; -12 vs. touchscreen, -27.9%). This research presents an easy-to-implement touchscreen interface that improves performance in teleoperated surface tasks while reducing cognitive load.

Computational attention models could help surgeons manage the visual demands of laparoscopy, but they require dense spatial labels that are difficult to obtain because surgical intent is highly specialized and tacit. Here, we introduce DiffeoAfford, an action-grounded tissue affordance framework that retrospectively derives visual attention supervision from completed surgical procedures. By combining diffeomorphism-constrained tissue tracking with instrument trajectory analysis, DiffeoAfford generates affordance hotspot labels without manual per-frame annotation. A real-time prediction model trained on these labels anticipates relevant surgical regions and enables AffordView, an assistive auto-framing system for laparoscopic visualization. The proposed framework aligns with expert annotations and intraoperative surgeon gaze, and reduces surgeon cognitive workload during real-world evaluations using subjective, physiological, and behavioral measures.

Measuring conversational states such as cognitive load and conversational power from multimodal behavior requires characteristic features that are not only predictive but also reliable across task contexts. We present a three-dimensional evaluation framework assessing predictive accuracy, cross-task generalizability, and test-retest reliability, applied to interactional, acoustic, and linguistic features extracted from dyadic conversations during collaborative tasks performed over a video-conferencing platform (AVCAffe dataset; 53 dyads, 9 tasks). Our results show that no single feature family dominates all three dimensions. Linguistic features show the highest predictive accuracy for cognitive load but collapse under cross-task evaluation, revealing sensitivity to task-specific vocabulary. Additionally, acoustic reliability, often reported as evidence of feature stability, degrades once speaker identity is controlled, confirming that standard prosodic features measure vocal characteristics rather than conversational state. Interaction features provide the only genuinely reliable signal, unchanged after speaker normalization. Interestingly, classifying power role remained near chance baseline across all conditions, indicating limitations of task-level aggregated behavior for predicting power role in conversation. Our findings reveal three insights: (1) linguistic features predict best but generalize poorly across task contexts; (2) acoustic reliability collapses to near-zero once speaker identity is controlled, challenging standard evaluation practice; and (3) interaction features provide the only genuinely reliable signal, with floor dominance predicting within-dyad cognitive load asymmetry. These results argue for speaker normalization and multi-dimensional evaluation as prerequisites for context-aware, robust multimodal feature selection in conversational systems.

Sharp et al. (2025) introduce "agentic inequality" as a framework for analyzing disparities in access to AI agents across three dimensions: availability, quality, and quantity. These person- and organization-level dimensions characterize who can access agents and at what capability, but do not address a structurally important divide operating at a finer level: the individual interaction. Two users with nominally equivalent agent access may experience qualitatively different AI utility depending on whether the system can autonomously retrieve context from the user's knowledge corpus (Dynamic Context Retrieval) or requires the user to manually identify and attach relevant documents at each query (Manual Attachment). We term this the Context Access Divide (CAD). For knowledge-intensive workers whose intellectual capital spans tens of thousands of files, the CAD constitutes a qualitative threshold in AI usefulness: below it, the cognitive burden of context curation falls on the human, reproducing the inefficiencies AI is meant to eliminate. We propose contextuality -- the degree to which an AI system autonomously accesses a user's accumulated knowledge capital -- as a dimension of AI-mediated inequality that complements, but is not reducible to, the Sharp et al. framework. We formalize the CAD with a probabilistic model grounded in the fan effect literature in cognitive psychology, demonstrating that manual context attachment leads to a combinatorial collapse in task-success probability as corpus size and task conjunctivity grow, while dynamic retrieval architectures are structurally insulated from this collapse. We analyze the technical basis of this divide in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) architectures, and examine its implications for knowledge-work stratification and AI platform governance.

This paper presents an exploratory evaluation of how increasing levels of AI autonomy affect software development productivity, requirement adherence, and developer cognitive workload. A team of four developers reimplemented the same full-stack web application across three sequential phases: partial AI-assisted development using GitHub Copilot, an AI-exclusive workflow using GitHub Copilot, and an AI-exclusive workflow using AWS Kiro. Evaluation metrics included development effort (hours), requirement adherence (RITM score), AI-interaction efficiency, and NASA-TLX workload measures. Across phases, higher levels of AI autonomy were associated with reduced development effort, improved requirement adherence, and lower self-reported mental workload, while developer frustration increased modestly. The AWS Kiro phase achieved the strongest overall performance on most measured dimensions, suggesting that tooling architecture may influence outcomes independently of AI autonomy level.

Monitoring cognitive load during online learning could help instructors identify content that learners find difficult, but remote settings remove the visual cues that support this judgement in a classroom. We study whether a single-channel, consumer-grade EEG device (the NeuroSky MindWave Mobile 2) can distinguish easy from difficult educational-video content, using the publicly available dataset of Wang et al. [24] (ten learners, one excluded for excessive noise, leaving nine). We implement a hybrid CNN+LSTM+Attention model that combines the raw waveform with band-power features. In a within-subject setting, the model reaches up to 78.5% accuracy, compared with 55% for conventional feature-based classifiers; regularization (dropout and L2) closes the large gap between training and validation accuracy that we observe without it, keeping validation accuracy stable at roughly 68-73%. We are deliberately cautious about these numbers: with only nine subjects, within-subject evaluation is optimistic, and we argue that subject-independent evaluation -- in which no learner appears in both training and test data -- should be the standard for this task. To that end we release a reproducible evaluation pipeline. We frame the work as a feasibility study rather than a deployable system, and pair it with an open, notebook-based tool that records EEG, runs inference, and visualizes estimated cognitive load as a heatmap over the video timeline to help educators locate potentially challenging segments.

Improving vision-language models (VLMs) on visual reasoning typically requires retraining or hand-designed prompts and tools. We present Dynamo, a training-free framework that adapts a frozen VLM without any weight updates. On a small labeled training subset, the agent inspects its own correct and incorrect attempts and evolves two complementary capabilities: reusable reasoning skills for cognitive bottlenecks, and executable visual tools for perceptual ones. Each generated tool is paired with a skill that specifies when to invoke it, and both capability types accumulate in a persistent library. Across four visual reasoning benchmarks and five VLM backbones, Dynamo improves direct inference on all 20 model--benchmark settings (avg. +5.6 acc). When the tool set is given in advance, the framework learns when to call each tool, and per-step tool choice improves on every tested backbone. Against task-specific RL (VTool-R1, DeepEyes), Dynamo closes 65--99% of the RL gap at a fraction of the compute, and combines additively with RL when available.

Email communication has become an integral part of personal and professional life, but handling its vast volume is still a significant issue for large organisations. Manual perusal of emails and forwarding their contents and attachments to intended recipients using other instant messaging platforms has proved to be error-prone and time-consuming leading to losses in terms of productivity and creating undue stress. The main objective of this paper is to explore an alternative mechanism that is to automate the task of dispatching emails based on their contents to the respective WhatsApp groups of students of various semesters of programs in an engineering college, facilitating a smooth flow of information from one end to another end in an organisation. The dispatcher system is built using agents querying large language models (LLMs) to enable it to analyze the contents of emails and route them to the relevant groups of students for their information and consumption. The system harnesses the capabilities of LLMs in analysing the textual contents for decision-making. With a well-structured agent framework prompt that includes email content as input with instructions and context, the system figures out the relevant groups to which the email message is dispatched, thus providing the required information on time. The proposed system does not rely on labelled datasets and provides several benefits, including enhanced productivity and a reduction in the cognitive load associated with reading emails.

Large language models (LLMs) can make scientific software easier to use. However, a general model does not automatically know which measurements a particular sensor can support, which algorithms are implemented in the current software, or which conclusions are justified by a computed result. These distinctions are especially important for low-channel electroencephalography (EEG), where sparse spatial coverage and variable signal quality make plausible but unsupported interpretations easy to produce. We present NeuraDock Agent, an open-source architecture that separates a deterministic local EEG engine from a hardware-aware language layer. The numerical engine parses recordings, performs quality control, executes reviewed spectral workflows, and writes machine-readable artifacts. The LLM receives only a compact, allowlisted summary and a versioned context pack. The context describes the seven-channel hardware, reviewed workflows, result fields, implementation boundaries, scientific limits, and reference cases. Raw EEG and dense per-sample arrays remain local We evaluate the system at three levels. First, 12 recordings produced identical structured results over ten numerical repetitions, and a complete Rest/Task run produced identical result, report, and figure hashes over three repetitions. Second, request-capture and failure-injection experiments confirmed the tested data boundary and preservation of local artifacts under HTTP, malformed-output, and connection failures. Third, a boundary-awareness benchmark tested 36 ordinary and adversarial questions under four context ablations and two LLMs, yielding 288 outputs.These results support hardware- and implementation-aware grounding as a practical mechanism for calibrating what an EEG agent accepts, qualifies, or refuses; they do not establish clinical validity or a validated absolute cognitive-load index.

This tutorial paper provides a step-by-step, reproducible walkthrough of NeuraDock Agent, an open-source EEG agent focused on Alpha dynamics and visual cognitive-load analysis. The goal is practical: a reader should be able to install the agent, run EEG preprocessing and quality control, generate Alpha dynamics figures, perform within-subject Rest/Task visual cognitive-load comparison, run the public mini-dataset analyses and compare them with the reference validation summary, start an online dashboard, call the real-time API from an external application, and use the LLM interpretation layer to explain quality risks. Existing EEG toolkits provide excellent offline analysis, but assembling a real-time, quality-gated cognitive-load pipeline often requires manually bridging acquisition, custom QC, Alpha feature extraction, and a web API; this tutorial closes that offline-to-online gap. The tutorial uses a quality-gated workflow: downstream Alpha and workload metrics are computed only after preprocessing and QC gating rather than directly from raw EEG. In the included mini-dataset validation, the agent processed 18 recordings, generated 10 within-subject comparisons, observed task-related posterior Alpha suppression in 7 of 10 contrasts, estimated initial evidence of within-subject repeatability, and benchmarked local online API latency. The tutorial is intended for researchers, developers, and applied teams who want a transparent path from EEG files to real-time visual cognitive-load prototypes.

Cognitive workload monitoring is important for adaptive rehabilitation and assistive interfaces, where task difficulty, pacing, and feedback should be adjusted according to the user's cognitive state to avoid overload and under-challenge. Emerging extended reality and robot-assisted rehabilitation environments provide controllable training tasks, but they require unobtrusive sensing methods that can capture rapid ocular dynamics during interaction. Existing eye-movement-based cognitive workload recognition methods mainly rely on frame-based eye trackers, which often suffer from limited temporal resolution and degraded robustness under rapid eye movements. In contrast, event cameras provide microsecond-level temporal resolution, high dynamic range and low latency, making them suitable for capturing fine-grained ocular dynamics. Many previous studies rely on free-viewing or similar paradigms, where gaze locations can vary across tasks. As a result, models may learn associations between gaze-location distributions and cognitive workload, rather than workload-related eye movement characteristics themselves. In this work, we introduce EveLoad, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first event-based eye-movement dataset with graded cognitive workload annotations, collected from 20 healthy participants under spatially constrained and task-driven conditions using a controlled N-back-guided fixation paradigm. Based on this dataset, we establish a benchmark for cognitive workload recognition with six workload levels and propose a learning framework that encodes spatiotemporal event representations. Experimental results show that our approach achieves an average subject-specific accuracy of 96.36% and 96.13% under mixed random split evaluation. These results suggest that event-based eye movements may provide a useful sensing pathway for future workload-aware rehabilitation.

Accurately classifying cognitive load from functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals remains a significant challenge due to temporal variability, inter-subject differences, and sensitivity to preprocessing choices. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of EEGNet for fNIRS-based cognitive load classification by systematically examining the effects of temporal segmentation strategies (overlapping vs. non-overlapping), window lengths (10s, 20s, 30s), feature extraction methods (Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Fast Independent Component Analysis (FastICA)), learning rate configurations (fixed and adaptive), and evaluation protocols (random split vs. subject-independent (SI)). Results from random-split experiments show that overlapping segmentation, combined with smaller fixed learning rates (0.01-0.001), yields the highest accuracies, due to temporal redundancy and dense sampling of hemodynamic transitions. However, SI evaluation reveals a substantial drop in accuracy, demonstrating limited generalization to unseen participants. Under SI evaluation, non-overlapping segmentation outperformed overlapping windows, with the best accuracy of 56.11% achieved using PCA features with a 20-second window and a 0.1 learning rate. These findings indicate that eliminating temporal redundancy helps the model learn more robust and generalizable representations of cognitive load across individuals. Although adaptive learning rate strategy improved training stability, it did not surpass the performance of optimally selected fixed learning rates. The study highlights the critical role of segmentation strategy and learning rate selection in improving model generalization and identifies methodological considerations essential for developing reliable, real-time, and SI cognitive load classification systems using fNIRS.

We introduce SCAN -- a human-centric decision-making framework to facilitate learners for effective task allocation with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) based on Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development and Metacognition. In SCAN, we systematize and formalize AI-human interaction by introducing a task-identification approach with four "sub-zones": Substitute, Complement, Aid, and Non-negotiable. After describing the four sub-zones, we demonstrate how SCAN framework can be applied for knowledge workers in the workplace and students in education to metacognitively "scan" their use of Generative AI. We then discuss how such framework can be related to cognitive load theory, cognitive offloading, sycophancy, three decision-making modes in human-AI interactions (automation, augmentation, and collaboration), future of work such as upskilling and deskilling, and how it accounts for both human-human and human-AI learning. We propose that SCAN offers a great starting point before discussing whether GenAI complements or replaces our abilities when completing a task, with a general objective of sustaining lifelong learning, and a specific goal of reaching hybrid intelligence.

We develop a formal theory of cognitive debt: the stock of unverified reasoning obligations that accumulates when individuals use AI as a substitute rather than a complement for first-principles cognition. The model features two state variables per agent, cognitive capital and cognitive debt, and a multiplicative production technology in which cognitive capital functions as collateral that determines the return to AI adoption. We establish six propositions. Rational agents incur positive cognitive debt because the costs are deferred, partially external, and masked by short-run productivity gains. Tranquil periods lower subjective risk assessments, raise AI substitution intensity, and compound leverage, generating a cognitive Minsky moment in which subjective risk falls while true systemic fragility rises. Expected crisis losses are convex in aggregate leverage. Post-crisis, output-target pressure can produce a false-correction loop in which agents patch AI failures with more AI. The decentralised equilibrium over-adopts substitutive AI relative to the social optimum because of systemic risk, cognitive public goods, and arms-race externalities. In a two-type heterogeneous-agent economy, high-cognitive-capital agents adopt AI more intensively and may eventually erode their unaided cognitive capital below that of initially lower-skilled agents.

When LLM agents hand information to one another, does the message format matter? Two literatures disagree: format-optimization work reports that structured messages cut cost without hurting accuracy, while format-restriction studies find that imposing structure degrades generation. Neither line has measured what happens when messages traverse multiple hops, where copy fidelity, rather than one-shot generation quality, dominates. We introduce a controlled relay testbed in which briefs of twelve programmatic atomic facts are re-encoded hop by hop in five formats (free natural language, precision-instructed NL, JSON, triples, key-value) over six hops, scored against programmatic ground truth by a fixed strong grader, across two relay-capability tiers, a cognitive-load condition, and a paired-fork error injection. We find that (i) a strong relay is nearly lossless for every format (hop-6 QA recall $\geq 0.973$), with residual loss concentrated at the first encoding step; (ii) per-hop cognitive load raises generation cost by 24-53% while fidelity changes stay within $\pm 1.8$ points; (iii) under a weak 1.5B relay, the across-format dispersion of hop-6 recall grows by a factor of $8.7$ (CI 5.3-15.5), driven by an encode-drift trade-off that flips the format ranking in transit; and (iv) once an injected error is present, every format propagates it faithfully (surface persistence 83-100%) and no format cascades collateral damage onto neighboring facts. Structure buys a faithful, error-localizing channel, not an error-correcting code.

The integration of artificial intelligence into human decision-making environments has introduced a previously undertheorized cost: the gradual surrender of human autonomy in exchange for access to information and computational assistance. Building on the Human Identity and Autonomy Gap (HIAG) framework, this paper advances a theoretical model of autonomy surrender as a measurable, cumulative process driven by cognitive bandwidth depletion. The model proposes three interacting mechanisms: the silent cost of AI assistance, in which autonomy is transferred incrementally and without awareness; the surrender threshold, beyond which reclaiming autonomous function becomes cognitively and psychologically difficult; and the recovery mechanism, which establishes the design obligation and the ethical responsibility accompanying deliberate human re-assumption of control. The paper argues that human re-entry into the decision loop is not a passive option but an active cognitive event requiring intentional bandwidth restoration. The design of AI systems must incorporate structured re-entry pathways, here termed recovery mechanisms, that preserve human agency while appropriately distributing responsibility. The model further predicts a terminal state, here termed preference inversion, in which functional dependence on AI assistance is experienced not as a deficit but as a preference, transforming the restoration of autonomy from a design problem into a cultural and political one. Implications are drawn for AI system design, governance frameworks, and human factors research.

Estimating cognitive load from speech has largely been studied in controlled laboratory settings, with limited understanding of its reliability in natural collaborative conversations. We investigate whether speech and interaction dynamics predict perceived cognitive load during dyadic conversations. We analyze audio from 53 dyads performing nine collaborative tasks and extract static acoustic, dynamic, and interaction features to train a two-head Gated Recurrent Unit encoder to predict cognitive load scores. Results show conversational interaction provides useful signals for predicting cognitive load related to time pressure, mental work, effort, and task performance. Temporal demand is associated with turn-taking dynamics such as overlap and speaker switch, while mental demand is linked to imbalanced participation between speakers. These findings highlight the importance of task structure and conversational interaction for modeling cognitive load in natural collaborative settings.

AI is changing how software engineers work, but it often comes with hidden burdens and costs. In this paper, we characterize two such often-overlooked burdens: (1) the constant need for human oversight and inspection of AI-generated artifacts; and (2) the growing cognitive overload on software engineers from receiving large amounts of suggestions from AI tools. The need for human oversight is not optional-engineers must review, validate, and sometimes rework what AI produces. At the same time, the flood of AI suggestions, prompts, and possible solutions can leave developers mentally stretched. By blending evidence from recent opinions from practitioners, we highlight these often-overlooked challenges and open a conversation about how teams can handle them in day-to-day AI-assisted software engineering.

This study evaluates the pedagogical viability of LLM-generated English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning content. Utilising log data from Japanese junior high school students practicing on a grammar drilling application, we analysed how different question modalities impact student performance and whether theoretical localised CEFR difficulty tiers accurately predict empirical task difficulty. Results reveal a clear performance hierarchy: multiple-choice questions carried the lowest cognitive load, cloze tasks posed the greatest barrier to active recall, and drag-and-drop exercises incurred the heaviest time penalties. Furthermore, learner data validated the CEFR-J grammar framework, showing a steady decline in accuracy and increased response times as proficiency levels advanced. These findings demonstrate that LLMs can successfully generate learning content, while highlighting the need for developers to strategically sequence question modalities to transition learners from passive recognition to active linguistic production.

AI tools are increasingly integrated into real-world workflows. However, existing measures of reliance on these tools focus on AI output adoption or on self-reported indicators, rather than how task effort is distributed between users and tools. Here, we introduce offloading score, a measure of reliance that quantifies the fraction of cognitive effort offloaded to an AI tool. Offloading Score is simulation-based -- we construct a counterfactual workflow by estimating how the user would have completed the task without the tool, and then computing the fraction of steps saved by using the tool. We validate offloading score through intrinsic evaluations of metric validity, and a controlled user study ($n=40$) with developers performing programming tasks using AI tools. We vary time pressure to test whether reliance measures capture the known increase in reliance under time pressure. We show that offloading score detects significantly higher reliance in time-constrained settings ($+43\%$, $p=0.018$), while usage-based and self-reported baseline measures of reliance do not distinguish the conditions. We complement this with descriptive insights showing that higher reliance manifests as greater delegation of subtasks to the tool and more direct reuse of AI outputs. Finally, we demonstrate an approach of using offloading score in combination with target outcomes of a task (e.g., code understanding) to identify when reliance may be (in)appropriate. Our framework offers two contributions: an instrument users can apply to measure and reflect on their own reliance, and a quantitative signal that agent designers can utilize to mitigate overreliance.

Accurate and generalizable estimation of cognitive workload from electroencephalography (EEG) is critical for human-centered and safety-critical systems. Although EEG is widely used for workload assessment, the consistency of region-level EEG contributions across tasks, datasets, and subjects remains unclear. This paper presents a region-level evaluation framework for EEG-based workload prediction in which models are trained and evaluated using features extracted exclusively from electrodes belonging to anatomically defined scalp regions. We perform a large-scale analysis across four publicly available EEG workload datasets spanning diverse task demands, recording hardware, and electrode montages. Region importance is quantified using a model-agnostic, performance-based approach under both mixed-subject and subject-independent evaluation protocols, with results aggregated using a rank-based strategy to ensure robustness across experimental configurations. Across all datasets and subject-independent evaluations, frontal electrode groups outperform the full-scalp baseline by approximately 15-20% in relative rank position while using substantially fewer electrodes. Fronto-central regions exhibit the most stable predictive utility, whereas posterior and occipital regions contribute less consistently across experimental conditions. These findings indicate that workload-relevant EEG information is most consistently retained within frontal and fronto-central electrode groups, supporting the design of efficient and generalizable EEG-based workload monitoring systems.

The integration of AI tools in academic settings has introduced a distinct form of strain that existing frameworks like technostress and digital fatigue have not yet fully addressed. This study develops a conceptual model and identifies the dimensions that define AI fatigue as a form of strain arising from sustained academic use of AI tools. Using grounded theory analysis of open-ended responses from 1,054 university students across three universities in the Philippines, the study examined the cognitive, motivational, emotional, physical, and attentional pressures students experienced during AI-supported academic work. Analysis produced five dimensions of AI fatigue, namely Cognitive Overload, Motivational Disengagement, Moral Unease, Physical Strain, and Attentional Drift, each consisting of two indicators grounded in participant accounts. The findings also yielded the AI Fatigue Model, a stage-based framework that explains how these pressures accumulate and reinforce one another across repeated AI interaction in academic tasks. These contributions establish a conceptual and exploratory foundation for AI fatigue as a distinct construct and provide a basis for future instrument validation, scale development, and cross-contextual inquiry in academic settings where AI now mediates student learning.

Real-world long video understanding requires models to perform continuous tracking, information integration and memory retention over massive temporal spans within extreme video durations. Mastering this intense cognitive load constitutes the fundamental bottleneck in long video understanding. While existing benchmarks have driven progress by scaling up video duration, their evaluation tasks often require comprehending only short and isolated video segments, falling short of capturing the challenge of ultra-long-context reasoning. To measure this cognitive load, we emphasize continuous certificate length, defined as the video length a human must continuously watch to definitively answer a given question. Driven by this metric, we introduce VideoOdyssey, a benchmark specifically designed for ultra-long-context and omni-modal video understanding. VideoOdyssey is characterized by three key features: 1) Extreme video duration and diversity: spanning 11 domains and 54 subcategories with an average video duration of 109 minutes; 2) Comprehensive evaluation scenarios: offering two subsets to address different research focuses, i.e., VideoOdyssey-V for probing the limits of visual understanding in MLLMs, and VideoOdyssey-AV for evaluating synchronized audio-visual understanding for omni-modal models; 3) Ultra-long and multi-level continuous certificates: extending the average continuous certificate to 16 minutes for VideoOdyssey-V and 12.8 minutes for VideoOdyssey-AV. Crucially, we design 5 granular levels from seconds to hours, providing a comprehensive diagnostic tool to evaluate models across varying context lengths and cognitive loads. Extensive evaluations show that bottlenecks of current MLLMs extend beyond simple retrieval to include struggles with continuous reasoning across varying context lengths, fine-grained perception, and non-verbal omni-modal understanding.

Real-time cognitive load assessment from eye-tracking signals could enable adaptive human-centered AI in safety-critical applications such as driver vigilance monitoring or automated flight deck assistance, yet two challenges persist: handling frequent data missingness from blinks and tracking failures, and efficiently modeling long-range temporal dependencies. We propose MambaGaze (Bi-Mamba), a framework that addresses these challenges through (1)~XMD encoding, which augments raw features with observation masks and time-deltas to explicitly model data uncertainty, and (2)~bidirectional Mamba-2, which captures temporal dependencies with linear computational complexity. Experiments on CLARE and CL-Drive datasets under leave-one-subject-out evaluation show that MambaGaze achieves 77.1% accuracy and 59.2% macro-F1 on CLARE, and 69.4% accuracy and 51.5% macro-F1 on CL-Drive, attaining the highest average LOSO macro-F1 (55.3%) across all ten compared models. Input-stream ablation indicates that log-scaled time-deltas are the strongest single channel in our setting, and combining all three XMD streams provides consistent gains of 5--20,pp macro-F1. Edge deployment benchmarks on three NVIDIA Jetson Orin platforms show real-time inference at 27--36,FPS with power consumption below 6.6,W, supporting feasibility for embedded cognitive load monitoring.

Assessing cognitive load continuously and at low latency would help adaptive human-computer interaction, but it remains hard because labeled data are scarce and models generalize poorly across subjects. Recent ECG foundation models, pre-trained on millions of clinical diagnostic ECG recordings, yet they do not apply directly to wearable devices when the sensor configuration and the task both differ. We present CogAdapt, a framework that adapts a clinical ECG foundation model to wearable cognitive load assessment. CogAdapt has two parts. LeadBridge is a learnable adapter that maps 3-lead wearable signals to a 12-lead-compatible representation. ProFine is a progressive fine-tuning strategy that unfreezes encoder layers in stages while limiting representational drift in the pre-trained model. On two public datasets (CLARE and CL-Drive) under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, CogAdapt reaches macro-F1 of 0.626 and 0.768, improving over from-scratch baselines by 11.2 and 16.1 percentage points. The results show that a clinical ECG pretraining can support subject-independent cognitive load assessment from wearable sensors.

AI-based code assistants are transforming software development, yet we lack empirical evidence on how they affect developers' cognitive processes. We present a multisite study investigating the neurophysiological correlates of AI-assisted programming through a within-subjects crossover design. We recruited participants at two universities (Bari, Italy, and Copenhagen, Denmark) and collected electroencephalography, eye-tracking, electrodermal activity, and heart rate variability data alongside a rubric-based performance score and self-reported workload across six dimensions using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). We tested four hypotheses addressing physiological differences between AI-assisted and non-assisted conditions, the moderating role of developer experience, the association between physiology and performance, and the alignment between subjective perceptions and objective measures. Under AI assistance, the EEG $θ/α$ ratio was lower during the first task and the gaze blink rate was higher during the second, both consistent with reduced cognitive engagement when developers offload generative effort to the model. This pattern did not differ between undergraduate and graduate students. Electrodermal activity correlated with performance under the non-AI condition but not under AI. Among the six NASA-TLX dimensions of self-reported workload, only Physical demand was associated with performance under the non-AI condition but not under AI. These findings suggest that AI-assisted programming is not a faster version of solo coding but a cognitively distinct activity, with implications for the design of AI assistants and for biometric monitoring in AI-augmented development.

As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into journalism, designing effective AI-use disclosures that inform readers without imposing unnecessary burden is a key challenge. While prior research has primarily focused on trust and credibility, the impact of disclosures on readers' attentional and cognitive load remains underexplored. To address this gap, we conducted a $3\times2\times2$ mixed factorial study manipulating the level of AI-use disclosure detail (none, one-line, detailed), news type (politics, lifestyle), and role of AI (editing, partial content generation), measuring load via NASA-TLX and eye-tracking. Our results reveal a significant attentional cost: one-line disclosures resulted in significantly higher fixation durations and saccade counts, particularly for AI-edited content. Detailed disclosures did not impose additional burden. Drawing on Information-Gap Theory, we argue that brief labels may trigger increased visual scrutiny by alerting readers to AI use without providing enough information. NASA-TLX scores and pupil diameter showed no significant differences across conditions, suggesting that AI-use disclosures do not impose cognitive burden regardless of the detail level. Interview insights contextualize these findings and reveal a strong preference for detailed or ``detail-on-demand'' designs. Our findings inform the design of gaze-informed adaptive disclosure interfaces that dynamically adjust transparency levels based on readers' attentional patterns and news context.

Multi-agent systems (MAS) assume that collaborating inherently improves Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning. We challenge this by demonstrating that simulated social pressure triggers an algorithmic Bystander Effect,'' inducing severe cognitive loafing. By evaluating 22,500 deterministic trajectories across 3 dataset contexts (GAIA, SWE-bench, Multi-Challenge) with 3 state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, we semantically audit internal reasoning traces against external outputs. We formalize the \textit{Interaction Depth Limit} ($D_L$), the exact plurality threshold where an agent's logical sovereignty collapses into social compliance. Crucially, we uncover the \textit{Sovereignty Gap}: models frequently compute the correct derivation internally but suffer Alignment Hallucinations'' -- actively subjugating empirical evidence to sycophantically appease a simulated swarm. We prove that multi-agent social load is strictly non-commutative; the "brand" identity of the ``Lead Anchor'' auditor disproportionately dictates the swarm's integrity. These findings expose architectural vulnerabilities, proving that unstructured multi-agent topologies can degrade independent reasoning.

Conversational AI has a fundamental flaw as a knowledge interface: sycophantic chatbots induce epistemic entrenchment and delusional belief spirals even in rational agents. We propose the problem does not stem from the AI model, rooted instead in a systemic consequence of the paradigm shift from user-driven knowledge search to users and agents engaged in strategic, repeated-play communication. We formalize the problem as a Crawford-Sobel cheap talk game, where costless user signals induce a pooling equilibrium. Agents optimized for user satisfaction produce sycophantic strategies that provide identical reinforcement across user types with opposite epistemic incentives: exploratory Growth-seekers'' ($θ_G$) and confirmatory Validation-seekers'' ($θ_V$). Under repeated play, this identification failure creates a coordination trap -- analogous to a Prisoner's Dilemma -- where locally rational feedback loops drive users toward pathologically certain false beliefs. We propose an inference-time mechanism design intervention called an Epistemic Mediator that breaks this pooling equilibrium by introducing a costly signal (epistemic friction), forcing type revelation based on users' asymmetric cognitive costs for processing resistance. A key contribution is Belief Versioning, a git-inspired epistemic meta-memory system that stores healthy beliefs and rollbacks when validation-seeking resistance is detected. In simulation, this intervention achieves a separating equilibrium achieving a $48\times$ differential in spiral rates while passing a learning preservation criterion), evidence that epistemic safety in AI is fundamentally a problem of strategic information environment design rather than simple model alignment.

This paper presents the development and validation of an eye-tracking dataset designed to investigate how second-language (L2) learners process idiomatic expressions. While native speakers often rely on direct retrieval of figurative meanings, L2 speakers frequently adopt a literal-first approach, which incurs measurable cognitive costs. This resource captures these costs through ocular metrics recorded from Portuguese L1 speakers of English across all CEFR proficiency levels (A1-C2). Although the study uses entry-level 60 Hz hardware (Tobii Pro Spark), we demonstrate that this sampling rate provides sufficient data density to detect macro-cognitive events such as fixations and regressions in reading. Preliminary analysis validates the dataset by revealing a strong inverse correlation between language proficiency and regressive eye movements. Integrated into the MIA (Modeling Idiomaticity in Human and Artificial Language Processing) initiative, this dataset serves as a cognitively grounded benchmark for evaluating both human processing models and the alignment of large language models with human-like figurative understanding.

LLM-as-a-Judge has become a dominant approach in automated evaluation systems, playing critical roles in model alignment, leaderboard construction, quality control, and so on. However, the scalability and trustworthiness of this approach can be substantially distorted by Self-Preference Bias (SPB), which is a directional evaluative deviation in which LLMs systematically favor or disfavor their own generated outputs during evaluation. Existing measurements rely on costly human annotations and conflate generative capability with evaluative stance, and thus are impractical for large-scale deployment in real-world systems. To address this issue, we introduce a fully automated framework to quantifying and mitigating SPB, which constructs equal-quality pairs of responses with negligible quality differences, enabling statistical disentanglement of discriminability from bias propensity without human gold standards. Empirical analysis across 20 mainstream LLMs reveals that advanced capabilities are often uncorrelated, or even negatively correlated, with low SPB. To mitigate this bias, we propose a structured multi-dimensional evaluation strategy grounded in cognitive load decomposition, which reduces SPB by 31.5% on average.

Since software performance requirements are documented in natural language, quantifying them into mathematical forms is essential for software engineering. Yet, the vagueness in performance requirements and uncertainty of human cognition have caused highly uncertain ambiguity in the interpretations, rendering their automated quantification an unaddressed and challenging problem. In this paper, we formalize the problem and propose IRAP, an approach that quantifies performance requirements into mathematical functions via interactive retrieval-augmented preference elicitation. IRAP differs from the others in that it explicitly derives from problem-specific knowledge to retrieve and reason the preferences, which also guides the progressive interaction with stakeholders, while reducing the cognitive overhead. Experiment results against 10 state-of-the-art methods on four real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of IRAP on all cases with up to 40x improvements under as few as five rounds of interactions.

Accurate and continuous estimation of cognitive workload is fundamental to creating adaptive human-machine systems. However, designing architectures that balance representational capacity with computational efficiency has been challenging for practical deployment. This paper introduces 1BT, a One-Block Transformer for compact and efficient EEG-based cognitive workload assessment. The model aggregates multi-channel temporal sequences via a minimal latent bottleneck, using a single cross-attention module followed by lightweight self-attention. A controlled study involving 11 participants performing three cognitively diverse tasks (abstract reasoning, numerical problem-solving, and an interactive video game) was conducted with continuous EEG recordings across two workload levels. Systematic architectural analysis identifies the most compact configuration that preserves high performance, while substantially lowering computational cost. The final model achieves high workload classification performance with under 0.5 million parameters and 0.02 GFLOPs, paving the way for a design direction for real-time cognitive workload monitoring in resource-constrained settings.

We present a systematic empirical study of prompt engineering for formal mathematical reasoning in the context of the SAIR Equational Theories Stage 1 competition. The task requires deciding whether one equational law implies another over all magmas -- a problem that is undecidable in general but decidable for FALSE via finite model search. Over five weeks, we designed, tested, and analyzed more than 40 prompt variants, ranging from 0 to 4,878 bytes, across four evaluation splits and three language models (gpt-oss-120b, Llama 3.3 70B, Gemma 4 31B). Our central finding is a single-prompt ceiling: despite substantial engineering effort, balanced hard accuracy plateaus in an empirical saturation region of approximately 60--79% for gpt-oss-120b, compared to a 59.75% no-cheatsheet baseline. We identify three mechanisms underlying this ceiling: (1) the mathematical undecidability of the TRUE case limits what any finite prompt can encode; (2) complex rule systems decrease performance on weaker models (Llama 3.3 70B collapses to 0% TRUE recall with prompts exceeding 2KB); and (3) prompt ordering effects interact with model attention in fragile, non-monotonic ways. Our best submission (AN45c, 2,252 bytes) achieves 79.25% accuracy on hard3 (n=400; 95% CI: [75.0%, 82.9%]), with TRUE recall of 95.9% and FALSE recall of 63.4%, representing a +19.5 percentage-point improvement over the no-cheatsheet baseline (59.75%). We release all prompt variants, evaluation scripts, and results at https://github.com/israelcazares/sair-prompt-engineering

Modeling human cognitive states is essential for advanced artificial intelligence. Existing Large Language Models (LLMs) mainly address isolated tasks such as emotion analysis or stance detection, and fail to capture interactions among cognitive dimensions defined in psychology, including emotion, thinking style, stance, and intention. To bridge this gap, we construct CognitiveBench, the first benchmark with unified annotations across the above four dimensions. Experiments on CognitiveBench show that although LLMs perform well on single dimension tasks, their performance drops sharply in joint multi-dimensional modeling. Using Gromov $δ$-hyperbolicity analysis, we find that CognitiveBench exhibits a strong hierarchical structure. We attribute the performance bottleneck to ``Cognitive Crowding'', where hierarchical cognitive states require exponential representational space, while the Euclidean space of LLMs grows only polynomially, causing representation overlap and degraded performance. To address this mismatch, we propose HyCoLLM, which models cognitive states in hyperbolic space and aligns LLM representations via Hyperbolic Guided Alignment Tuning. Results show that HyCoLLM substantially improves multi-dimensional cognitive understanding, allowing 8B parameter model to outperform strong baselines, including GPT-4o.

We examine whether large language models (LLMs) can predict biased decision-making in conversational settings, and whether their predictions capture not only human cognitive biases but also how those effects change under cognitive load. In a pre-registered study (N = 1,648), participants completed six classic decision-making tasks via a chatbot with dialogues of varying complexity. Participants exhibited two well-documented cognitive biases: the Framing Effect and the Status Quo Bias. Increased dialogue complexity resulted in participants reporting higher mental demand. This increase in cognitive load selectively, but significantly, increased the effect of the biases, demonstrating the load-bias interaction. We then evaluated whether LLMs (GPT-4, GPT-5, and open-source models) could predict individual decisions given demographic information and prior dialogue. While results were mixed across choice problems, LLM predictions that incorporated dialogue context were significantly more accurate in several key scenarios. Importantly, their predictions reproduced the same bias patterns and load-bias interactions observed in humans. Across all models tested, the GPT-4 family consistently aligned with human behavior, outperforming GPT-5 and open-source models in both predictive accuracy and fidelity to human-like bias patterns. These findings advance our understanding of LLMs as tools for simulating human decision-making and inform the design of conversational agents that adapt to user biases.

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a notable performance ceiling on complex, multi-faceted tasks. As practitioners increasingly rely on heavy context engineering -- curating intricate instructions, tool schemas, and multi-turn histories -- the processing demands often exceed the LLM's effective attention budget, leading to context rot. Drawing an analogy to Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) in cognitive science, we propose that this bottleneck is functionally analogous to the bounded working memory of the human mind. Rather than relying on heuristic prompt engineering, we use CLT as a principled design lens for LLM system design. To operationalize this insight, we introduce CoThinker, an instantiation of a CLT-driven multi-agent framework. CoThinker operationalizes CLT principles by distributing intrinsic cognitive load through agent specialization and managing transactional load via structured communication and a collective working memory. We empirically evaluate CoThinker on complex problem-solving tasks and fabricated high cognitive load scenarios. Our results are consistent with a CLT-informed account of multi-agent coordination: gains concentrate on reasoning-heavy tasks where cognitive load is high, while coordination overhead dominates on low-intrinsic-load tasks such as instruction-following -- a boundary predicted by the cognitive-load-profile view. Our analysis reveals characteristic interaction patterns that cast insights from collective cognition and load management into a principled approach to agent system design.

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is employed as a non-invasive method to monitor functional brain activation by capturing changes in the concentrations of oxygenated haemoglobin (HbO) and deoxygenated haemo-globin (HbR). Various machine learning classification techniques have been utilized to distinguish cognitive states. However, conventional machine learning methods, although simpler to implement, undergo a complex pre-processing phase before network training and demonstrate reduced accuracy due to inadequate data preprocessing. Additionally, previous research in cog-nitive load assessment using fNIRS has predominantly focused on differ-sizeentiating between two levels of mental workload. These studies mainly aim to classify low and high levels of cognitive load or distinguish between easy and difficult tasks. To address these limitations associated with conven-tional methods, this paper conducts a comprehensive exploration of the im-pact of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) layers on the effectiveness of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) within deep learning models. This is to address the issues related to spatial features overfitting and lack of tem-poral dependencies in CNN in the previous studies. By integrating LSTM layers, the model can capture temporal dependencies in the fNIRS data, al-lowing for a more comprehensive understanding of cognitive states. The primary objective is to assess how incorporating LSTM layers enhances the performance of CNNs. The experimental results presented in this paper demonstrate that the integration of LSTM layers with Convolutional layers results in an increase in the accuracy of deep learning models from 97.40% to 97.92%.

This study employs cutting-edge wearable monitoring technology to conduct high-precision, high-temporal-resolution (1-second interval) cognitive load assessment on electroencephalogram (EEG) data from the FP1 channel and heart rate variability (HRV) data of secondary vocational students. By jointly analyzing these two critical physiological indicators, the research delves into their application value in assessing cognitive load among secondary vocational students and their utility across various tasks. The study designed two experiments to validate the efficacy of the proposed approach: Initially, a random forest classification model, developed using the N-BACK task, enabled the precise decoding of physiological signal characteristics in secondary vocational students under different levels of cognitive load, achieving a classification accuracy of 97%. Subsequently, this classification model was applied in a cross-task experiment involving the National Computer Rank Examination (Level-1), demonstrating the method's significant applicability and cross-task transferability in diverse learning contexts. Conducted with high portability, this research holds substantial theoretical and practical significance for optimizing teaching resource allocation in secondary vocational education, as well as for cognitive load assessment methods and monitoring. Currently, the research findings are undergoing trial implementation in the school.

Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly adopted in design education, yet evaluating its educational value through final outcomes provides an incomplete picture. This study compares two ecologically plausible workflows in an architectural conceptual design task: GenAI-assisted image generation and ArchDaily-based precedent search. The comparison concerns complete workflows rather than the isolated contributions. Thirty-six students completed a two-phase design task, first designing independently and then revising with their assigned workflow. Eight judges rated design performance, while participants reported task-specific and general creative self-efficacy and cognitive load after each phase. Difference-in-differences analyses showed no significant overall differences between the GenAI and precedent-search workflows in design performance, cognitive workload, or task-specific creative self-efficacy. Beyond these null overall effects, three patterns were observed. General creative self-efficacy showed a significant relative decline under the GenAI workflow. A subgroup analysis suggested higher revision-phase performance among novice students using GenAI than among those using precedent search (F (1,32) = 4.303, p = 0.046). However, this exploratory interaction should be interpreted cautiously due to low rating reliability, small subgroup cells, and imprecise estimation. Third, exploratory prompt analyses suggested that iterative, task-specific prompting strategies (CD3, CD6) were associated with cognitive load reductions at the uncorrected level, but neither association survived multiple-comparison correction. Overall, the GenAI workflow did not produce uniform gains. Its educational value may depend on pedagogical framing, learner characteristics, and human-AI interaction structure, underscoring the need to preserve creative agency and develop prompt literacy.