Multimodal Fusion
Overview
Multimodal fusion studies how to combine inputs such as images, text, audio, medical scans, sensor streams, and structured records so models can use their complementary information. Common approaches include early or late fusion, cross-attention and contrastive alignment, and adaptive gates or mixtures of experts that weight modalities by task, sample, or estimated reliability. Methods are tested across settings such as BraTS medical segmentation, CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI sentiment analysis, RGB-thermal detection, and clinical prediction, with growing attention to missing, noisy, or misaligned inputs. A central open tension is that additional modalities can help when they add useful evidence, but can also introduce noise or let a dominant modality suppress weaker ones; robust gains and generalization beyond benchmark conditions remain difficult to establish.
Latest papers
772 papers73 papers in the last four weeks, down 12% on the four weeks before. 0.4% of all new papers.
To Fuse or to Drop? Dual-Path Learning for Resolving Modality Conflicts in Multimodal Emotion Recognition
Hybrid Congestion Classification Framework Using Flow-Guided Attention and Empirical Mode Decomposition
LUCAS-MEGA: A Large-Scale Multimodal Dataset for Representation Learning in Soil-Environment Systems
Multimodal Learning on Low-Quality Data with Conformal Predictive Self-Calibration
Unified Multimodal Visual Tracking with Dual Mixture-of-Experts
Disentangling Shared and Task-Specific Representations from Multi-Modal Clinical Data
OphMAE: Bridging Volumetric and Planar Imaging with a Foundation Model for Adaptive Ophthalmological Diagnosis
PC-MNet: Dual-Level Congruity Modeling for Multimodal Sarcasm Detection via Polarity-Modulated Attention
MUStARD benchmark and its spurious-correlation-mitigated balanced datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves new state-of-the-art performance, surpassing the strongest multimodal baseline by a substantial 3.14% improvement in Macro-F1. By architecturally isolating atomic, composition, and contextual conflicts. This work provides a robust, decoupled paradigm for modeling subtle pragmatic incongruities in human communication.