Human-Robot Interaction

Body-cue recognition can support assistive robots, but benchmark accuracy does not guarantee reliable behavior under a robot-camera viewpoint. We present Nuni, a bedside robot prototype that treats a detected distress cue as a reason to ask rather than a reason to alert. We compare two X3D-UGT RGB appearance classifiers, which reach 97.7% and 94.8% six-way accuracy on NTU RGB+D, with a pose-centric hybrid pipeline on 28 single-actor scripted clips recorded from the robot camera. The hybrid path achieved 0.71 six-way macro recall, versus 0.25 and 0.29 for the fine-tuned and from-scratch RGB variants. More importantly for interaction, it produced a question-triggering distress cue in 12/16 distress clips and would have prompted unnecessarily in 2/8 normal clips; the RGB variants yielded a question-triggering cue in only 2/16 and 3/16 distress clips. We separately tested the question-first controller through event injection. All 13 state-transition trials passed: valid responses caused stand-down, two unanswered prompts produced one alert, and three boundary conditions were handled correctly. These results are a preliminary technical evaluation, not a user study or medical validation, but they show how interaction policy can limit the consequences of uncertain perception.

Robots can recover from failures by asking bystanders for help, but effective human-in-the-loop recovery requires communication that accounts for differences in people's knowledge. Prior inverse-semantics work generates requests using a single listener model, leaving differences in listener knowledge untested. We introduce Listener Differences in Human-Robot Interaction (LD-HRI), a game, dataset, and benchmark that evaluates speakers through human listener performance. Our evaluation examines request properties, large language model (LLM) speakers, and inverse-semantics request-selection algorithms under controlled differences in listener information. The corpus contains 446 human-written requests and 1{,}302 listener trials. We additionally evaluated 24 frozen LLM-written requests with 70 human listeners across 560 trials. Novice success is descriptively higher with model-written requests across all four tasks, yet both request sources leave substantial expert--novice gaps, including 16 percentage points for LLM requests. LD-HRI makes these gaps measurable, providing a foundation for designing more robust communication in human-robot and human-agent interaction.

Robots operating in human-centered environments are typically designed to execute explicit instructions, and most robot-learning datasets likewise pair observations with task instructions or low-level actions. Although recent work has begun to explore proactive embodied assistance, existing resources target different settings and action levels, leaving real-world human-centered multimodal decision-making underexplored. We formulate this problem as \textit{Proactive Robot Action Reasoning} (\textit{ProRobo}), an upstream cognitive decision problem in which a robot must determine which action to take based on multimodal human and environmental cues without explicit action instructions. To support ProRobo, we introduce \textit{ProAction}, a real-world multimodal dataset containing 10K samples of visual observations, audio signals, and text inputs across 12 daily-life scenarios in five common scenes. To construct cognitively grounded high-level action supervision, we develop a two-stage human-in-the-loop pipeline that combines appraisal-guided candidate generation with Affective Theory-of-Mind-guided human refinement, explicitly incorporating contextual judgment about human states, urgency, feasibility, and potential risk into action annotation. Based on this supervision, we benchmark representative Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) and introduce \textit{MMC2Act}, a reference model that implicitly learns the mapping from multimodal observations to cognitively grounded high-level actions. Experiments across modality settings, subject-disjoint generalization, cross-dataset transfer, and human evaluation show that general-purpose MLLMs struggle with proactively reasoning high-level actions from multimodal cues, whereas training on \textit{ProAction} substantially improves performance.

Socially competent humanoid robots must communicate affect and intent through gesture as well as speech, yet open-ended interaction must become motion that is both expressive and executable on a specific body. This demands semantic flexibility for contextual social intent while preserving deterministic, embodiment-aware robot control. We present EmoPose, a vision-language model (VLM)-guided framework that bridges this gap through an executable semantic interface. Given language, dialogue history, and optional visual context, the VLM selects an ordered gesture plan containing a communicative class, library variant, intensity, and speech anchor. A scalable robot-owned motion library defines the available expressive vocabulary and the source of 14-DoF joint targets. Pose Studio supports automatic trajectory generation, MuJoCo preview, and automatic synchronization of new library entries with the VLM guide; deterministic robot-side modules validate plans, construct trajectories, schedule gestures, and manage queueing and interruption. This division lets the interaction repertoire grow for new social contexts without changing the control interface or delegating raw joint commands to the foundation model. On the EmoPose-Bench, structured GPT-5.5 planning reaches $98.25\pm0.52\%$ on the Easy tier and $76.50\pm0.54\%$ overall, exceeding same-model direct-label prompting. Further tests validate dialogue-context use and ordered multi-action composition. The system completes the nominal MuJoCo suite and realizes all 29 authored variants on the physical Unitree G1. A four-stop laboratory tour demonstrates expressive narration with interruption, camera-grounded dialogue, and navigation.

Underwater human--robot interaction requires gesture commands that are both easy for divers to use and reliable for robots to recognize. We investigate these aspects through a closed-loop diver--robot interaction framework integrating a compact seven-gesture vocabulary, lightweight landmark-based recognition, and command-level interaction logic. We evaluate the framework through a user study and underwater robot experiments in a laboratory tank and a swimming pool. The user study supported the reproducibility of the gestures after brief learning. Recognition analysis further showed that visual similarity was associated with gesture confusion, while intermediate poses during gesture formation introduced temporal ambiguity. Command-level processing mitigated the effects of transient recognition errors on robot execution, reducing unintended triggers and premature task interruptions. These findings show that reliable underwater gesture interaction depends on human usability, gesture recognizability, and execution reliability in underwater interaction.

Robots that follow natural-language instructions in everyday indoor environments must act on incomplete human utterances. Instructions often omit essential information, such as the identity of an out-of-view object, an intended destination, or the user's goal. Existing datasets contain little real-world situated dialogue and provide few practice-grounded criteria for deciding when a robot should act, confirm, clarify, or refuse. We retrospectively analyze a pilot Wizard-of-Oz study in which five participants performed everyday indoor tasks, including door opening, drawer opening, feeding, drinking, and cleaning, with a wheelchair-mounted mobile manipulator while the wizard responded without a formal communication policy. This preserved authentic user behavior but produced inconsistent robot-side decisions, motivating an explicit decision scheme. From 40 episodes, we derived a hierarchical taxonomy of six response modes (ANSWER, REPORT_DONE, REFUSE, CONFIRM, CLARIFY, ACT) and four ambiguity types (intent, referential, spatial, intelligibility). Two human annotators and an AI annotator applied the scheme to the pilot data. Clean-label rates were 91% and 89%, and Cohen's ranged from 0.72 to 0.95 across decision-point, mode, and ambiguity levels for both human-human and human-AI comparisons. Fine-tuning LLaVA-1.6-7B on taxonomy-derived labels for ACT and CLARIFY indicates the feasibility of training vision-language models using annotations from our taxonomy. Remaining boundary cases in decision-point identification and REPORT_DONE motivate a constrained protocol for more consistent dialogue collection.

Safety and comfort in human-robot physical in-teractions are essential aspects in the development of social technologies, where natural gestures, such as handshakes, represent a challenge due to their direct physical contact. The implementation of series elastic actuators (SEA) to absorb impacts is proposed as a design strategy that favors safer interactions. This paper presents an experimental study aimed at evaluating how the incorporation of SEAs in robotic arms influences perceived safety and the interaction experience dur-ing handshaking. The design allows a direct comparison of the effect of rigidity versus the incorporation of elastic elements, in order to identify the advantages of SEAs in improving the physical safety and social acceptance of robotic systems in everyday contexts. The experiment was carried out with 10 volunteers (6 men and 4 women), who performed two interactions with each robotic arm: one with rigid joints and the other with flexible joints using SEA. During testing, objective data on end-effector trajectories were collected, as well as subjective information through a perception survey focused on safety, naturalness, and confidence during the handshake. The survey results show increased perceptions of safety and comfort with the SEA-equipped arm, supporting its potential to facilitate safer and more socially accepted human-robot interactions.

Ensuring intrinsic safety in physical human robot interaction (pHRI) is a critical requirement for social and service robots. While Series Elastic Actuators (SEAs) offer hardware based compliance, traditional metallic designs often require complex, multi part assemblies. This paper presents the design, finite element analysis (FEA), and experimental validation of a low stiffness, torsional spring for SEAs, manufactured via 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). The compliant element exhibits a highly linear torque deformation response (Ks = 0.066 Nm/degree), matching numerical predictions with under 3% deviation, a variance attributed to FDM structural anisotropy. To accommodate external interactions using standard position limited servomotors, a hybrid position controller with torque threshold switching was implemented. Experimental evaluations demonstrate the system ability to accurately track non stationary trajectories and safely yield to external disturbances. Furthermore, the inherent material damping of the TPU acts as a passive low pass filter, preventing high frequency oscillations during control mode transitions. The proposed architecture offers a cost effective, reliable, and easily manufacturable solution for safe pHRI.

Open datasets describing human behavior in environments shared with mobile robots remain limited, particularly for retail activities that combine locomotion, reaching, object handling, and robot guided movement. This paper introduces OHRID Retail, an open, human centered multimodal dataset collected from 16 healthy adults performing a simulated shelf picking task under three within participant conditions: no robot, low speed robot guidance, and high speed robot guidance. Each participant completed two trials per condition. Whole body kinematics were recorded using 17 Xsens Awinda inertial sensors and muscle activity was measured at 10 locations using Delsys Trigno surface electromyography sensors. Descriptive analyses demonstrate variation in whole body movement intensity and muscle activation across robot interaction conditions and body locations. OHRID Retail provides openly available raw recordings, processed measures, documentation, and reproducible analysis resources. The dataset can support research in human activity recognition, multimodal sensor fusion, occupational biomechanics, ergonomics, human aware robot navigation, and human robot interaction in retail and related shared environments.

Prototyping and evaluating human-robot teaming (HRT) scenarios in the real-world is costly. Virtual simulation of HRT scenarios has been adopted as an alternative to conducting user studies in the real-world to investigate user perceptions, behaviors, and performance during human-robot interactions. The consistency of human behavior between the real and virtual-worlds is integral to the validity of utilizing such virtual experimentation. This paper presents a user study examining the difference in human behavior between an HRT scenario conducted in a virtual vs real environment. We employed mixed-methods to examine team performance and human factors during the HRT. Our quantitative results showed a significant difference in workload between the two modalities. Our qualitative analysis expanded on the quantitative results and found differences in participants' strategy, their mental model of robots, and the type of trust they had for robots between modalities.

A central challenge across control and learning is the design of mechanisms regulating the interactions between humans and autonomous agents. Inspired by the free energy principle from computational neuroscience, we introduce a control-theoretical framework to integrate human preferences online into an agent policy. We turn the framework into an open control architecture and validate our approach using a human-in-the-loop experimental testbed involving a rover navigating via onboard sensing. The human, remotely located and equipped with virtual reality headsets, shares the same sensory information as the rover. Human preferences are provided to the rover via gestures which introduce both cooperative and competitive interactions between the agent goal and the preferences. The experiments show that interactions are regulated, validating the proposed approach.

Contact-rich physical human--robot interaction (pHRI) imposes time-varying demands associated with physical interaction, motor regulation, and physiological response, motivating continuous assessment of interaction workload. This paper presents an online multimodal assessment framework that integrates interaction wrench, planar tool-center-point (TCP) kinematics, and skin conductance level (SCL) into four interpretable workload-related factors. Their relative contributions are adjusted using path curvature to reflect changes in motion demand and task progression to account for gradual physiological variation over time. The framework was evaluated with 24 participants across 18 controlled combinations of temperature, acoustic noise, and illuminance under two admittance-control modes. Strict leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) evaluation used standardized pupil diameter ($\mathrm{PD}_z$) as an independent physiological reference and included comparisons with static variants and representative state-of-the-art learning-based baselines. The proposed framework achieves a cohort-mean $30\,\mathrm{s}$ block-wise Spearman correlation of $ρ_{30}=0.308$ with the physiological reference, with positive subject-level correspondence in 23 of 24 participants. Its overall performance is comparable to the state-of-the-art learning-based baseline. At the same time, our framework keeps the assessment process transparent through explicit workload-related factors and defined weighting rules, while outperforming the corresponding fixed-weight formulation. The framework also maintains consistent performance across the two tested admittance-control modes. These results support a transparent and interpretable approach to continuous interaction workload assessment in contact-rich pHRI.

Offshore maintenance requires operations in the air, the surface, and the subsea domain and include human supervision. This paper presents LOTUSim-Energy, a real-time maritime simulator designed for multi-domain human--drone interaction for offshore operation and maintenance. The plat- form unifies heterogeneous unmanned vehicles (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: UAVs, Unmanned Surface Vehicles: USVs, Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: AUVs, Remotely Operated Vehicles: ROVs) within a distributed architecture coupling environment forcing (wind, waves, currents) and provides immersive user interfaces for supervision (desktop and virtual reality). A structured offshore task library enables repeatable evaluation of autonomy stacks under realistic metocean disturbances. The simulator supports realistic physics, energy-aware battery modeling, and fault-detection pipelines as modular validation tools. System-level performance is demonstrated on a multi-domain inspection scenario for monopile and transition piece structure, where we evaluate the reliability of integrated waypoint-follower plugin and Automatic Identification System (AIS)-referenced trajectory tracking under real-time energy monitoring. By combining unified environmental physics, heterogeneous vehicle simulation, and immersive supervision, LOTUSim-Energy provides an integration testbed for prototyping and rehearsing offshore human--robot collaboration workflows, as a step toward de-risking sea deployment.

Many publications on robotic systems in healthcare describe early-stage work on low technology readiness levels. This paper describes how a mobile service robot approved as a medical device reaches higher technology readiness levels by adding peripheral functions and smaller improvements, which are pivotal for user acceptance in clinical environments and which often cannot be elicited by questioning users ex-ante as certain aspects only come in mind from testing the systems in clinical settings or operational environments. Especially developers of service robots in healthcare are advised to plan with such downstream developments, which can take significant implementation time, to obtain user acceptance and achieve widespread adoption of their robotic systems.

Companion robots face everyday situations in which several feasible behaviors may be appropriate, yet different people prefer different responses. We introduce InterSocialBench, a benchmark of 210 domestic scenarios and 18 high-level behaviors, pairing judgments from 100 human participants with 23,520 responses from seven large language models under 16 personality conditions. Each human annotation preserves a preferred action alongside explicitly appropriate and inappropriate candidates. A structured construction pipeline covers behavioral alternatives, competing situational cues, and relevant history and future tasks. Evaluation distinguishes preferred-choice agreement from explicit rejection, using scenario-grouped splits for trainable predictors. Simple frequency and persona-voting baselines illustrate these objectives. Across the tested prompts, model and human behavior distributions differ, and the diversity gap remains after matching response counts: humans exhibit 4.68 distinct choices per scenario, compared with 2.06--3.46 for the models. Human scenario-level plurality agreement is 51.5%, describing disagreement rather than a universal prediction ceiling. InterSocialBench supports evaluating social behavior selection without replacing individual judgments with a single consensus label.

This letter investigates how the parameters of a slope-aware variable-admittance filter influence user preferences in force-based interaction with a robotic guide dog for visually impaired individuals. The proposed system consists of a quadruped robot equipped with a sensor-free rigid handle for physical guidance. The framework combines path following, momentum-based interaction-wrench estimation, and a variable-admittance filter whose stiffness and damping are adapted online from slope information extracted by the robot's depth camera. The adaptation policies are evaluated through high-fidelity simulations and a human-subject study involving blindfolded sighted participants. Multiple strategies are compared using a Taguchi L9 design of experiments. Preliminary main-effect results suggest that increasing stiffness uphill and decreasing it downhill improves both objective and subjective metrics, whereas damping shows no significant main effect.

Socially assistive robots (SARs) can support structured health and well-being interventions, but hardware and cost constraints limit interaction complexity and longitudinal real-world deployments. We present DART: Deployable Architecture for Robot-Mediated Tasks, an architecture that extends SARs through a web application and cloud infrastructure, enabling visual content, user input, remote computation, and persistent data storage synergistically with the robot's physical embodiment, speech, and movement. We evaluated DART by instantiating it in an interatively-developed full-stack HRI system for helping university students with elevated generalized anxiety to complete cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) homework exercises. The resulting system, which used the low-cost open-source Blossom robot platform, was refined and evaluated through a participatory design process and multiple user studies, and finally evaluated in an in-lab study with 103 participants, and then a six-week in-home deployment with four participants. In the in-lab evaluation, participants showed significant within-session reductions in stress, state anxiety, and negative affect, and gave the platform a mean System Usability Scale score of 78.89. In the home deployment, the mean System Usability Scale score was 87.5, with positive qualitative feedback on usability. Participants across both groups identified speech input, visual presentation, and web-robot synchronization as priorities for improvement. These findings validate DART as an effective architecture for extending the capabilities of a low-cost SAR in both in-lab single-session and in real-world longitudinal deployments.

Proactive in-cabin agents can help passengers understand automated-vehicle (AV) behavior, but communicating every ride event may introduce unnecessary interruptions. We investigated how communication should adapt to event priority and passenger activity. In a mixed-methods within-subject study, 41 participants rode as passenger in a VR simulated fully-automated vehicle. We compared an event-triggered (ET) policy that communicated immediately at every event with a context-sensitive (CS) policy that selected \textit{Immediate}, \textit{Delayed}, or \textit{Silent} communications. CS increased communication appropriateness and substantially reduced perceived interruption. Perceived trust did not differ between policies, although baselines dispositional trust differentiated communication preferences. Findings highlight event consequence, passenger activity, continuing information value, and confirmation need as key considerations for selective in-cabin communication.

Robots designed to mediate human groups often fall into the solutionist trap: they are framed as sociable agents that fix problems such as conflict, disengagement, or lack of coordination. We suggest a different way of thinking. Rather than discrete agents, robots can be understood as situated elements of shared environments; catalysts and carriers of group experience whose meaning emerges through how people position, interpret, and interact with them. From this perspective, robots are not there to repair some ostensible dysfunctionality, but to enable group-level sense-making around care, norms, and identity. Our prior work on robotic street furniture suggests that this does not happen by imitating human sociality but by taking the shape of deliberately constrained, group-facing entities that happen and act for \textit{us} without being socially entangled as one of us. We thus understand robots in public spaces not in terms of autonomy or intelligence, but as a relational capacity. This implies designing robots not in our image or for our utility, but grounded in our needs in being and becoming together.

Interaction paradigms used in robot-assisted autism intervention have historically employed robots as teachers, clinical assistants, or more-abled peers to promote a variety of social skills. These modalities often leverage the expertise of trained practitioners to ensure that child-robot interactions are productive or clinically grounded to yield positive therapeutic benefits for children across the autism spectrum. Yet, despite the fact that the majority of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) attend mainstream schools and spend 80% or more of their time in the general classroom [27], there is a paucity of research incorporating validated classroom teaching pedagogies into robot-assisted autism interventions. In this work, we introduce a novel teaching methodology for advancing social skills in school-aged children with ASD. We evaluate the effectiveness of a novel robot-assisted autism intervention which incorporates the learning-by-teaching pedagogy and explores the comparative benefits of employing a robot versus a human confederate for improved performance on a set of social skills tasks. Results show that 80% of study participants performed better in the robot condition (mean performance in the robot condition=63%, mean performance in the confederate condition=37%), irrespective of the scenario order. Further, 90% of all participants were significantly more engaged in the robot condition (mean engagement: robot=61%, confederate=32%) and, while the effect did not result in the confederate condition, analyses indicate that overall engagement in the robot condition contributed to improved performance. These results suggest that robots employed in a learning-by-teaching context may help enhance engagement and improve performance on a simple social skills task for children with ASD.

Robot swarms are increasingly used in applications where accessible interaction with non-expert users is desirable. This paper investigates freehand sketching as an end-user programming interface for specifying robot swarm geometries. Users communicate spatial intent through a drawing, while the swarm autonomously extracts target formation points, constructs a rigid formation graph, assigns robots to formation nodes, and executes distributed formation control with a guarantee against unintended reflected formations. The resulting sketch-to-swarm framework is evaluated through a human study examining the usability of freehand formation specification. Twenty participants generated $42$ geometric shapes, and the interface achieved a mean System Usability Scale score of $84.25$, which conventionally indicates high perceived usability. The results support freehand sketching as an intuitive interaction abstraction for human-swarm collaboration without requiring robotics or programming expertise.

An embodied assistant working beside a person must track task state, recognize help seeking, choose how to intervene, and produce an appropriate response. Existing procedural datasets richly describe individual execution, while interactive datasets capture remote verbal instruction or undifferentiated co-working. They do not jointly link a co-located helper's verbal and physical interventions to performer requests, task state, assistance triggers, and outcomes. We introduce DYAD (DYadic Assistance Dataset), a synchronized multimodal record of human-human assistance during gearbox assembly. Across 20 sessions, one trained helper follows a guidance-first policy while assisting HoloLens 2 wearers. DYAD links 528 task-step intervals and 611 performer requests with 851 valid assistance records spanning verbal and physical help. DYAD's annotations span the assistance process; three reference tasks evaluate selected components rather than an end-to-end system: causal step understanding, pre-onset mode anticipation, and instructor response generation. On 829 eligible mode events, the strongest four-seed RGB mean is 0.548 +/- 0.007 macro-F1; causal metadata reaches 0.624 and a privileged trigger mapping 0.915, revealing information not recovered from pre-onset RGB. DYAD's contribution is not scale, but a linked interaction structure spanning help seeking, intervention choice, execution, and outcome under egocentric and workspace sensing.

In multi-party human-robot interaction, a robot must continuously decide whom to address and what to say to participate effectively in the conversation. In real-world interactions, this is challenging because several behaviours may be plausible at the same time: a robot might continue a topic with one participant, involve another through a question, or address the whole group, with the appropriate choice depending on both whom it addresses and the interaction context. Current approaches remain limited in representing uncertainty when several behaviours are plausible and in structuring decisions into semantically meaningful intermediate steps that make robot decisions easier to interpret. Addressing these, we present HiBRIDGE, a hierarchical Bayesian neural network framework for group-robot dialogue management. Its Bayesian formulation enables uncertainty-aware prediction and robust learning from limited interaction data, while the hierarchical approach formulates behaviour selection as a structured, multi-stage decision process. We further use decision-tree surrogates to investigate whether this structure can support more interpretable explanations. Across three offline group-HRI datasets, our findings show that Bayesian formulations outperform their deterministic counterparts and several state-of-the-art baselines. Next, through an online study (N=20), we show that explanations derived from the hierarchical model are rated as more helpful for understanding robot behaviour and are preferred over those derived from the flat model. Finally, through our in-person study (N=12), we demonstrate the feasibility of HiBRIDGE for autonomous real-time group interaction, with both hierarchical and flat Bayesian variants positively perceived. Overall, HiBRIDGE combines strong predictive performance with a structured decision process that supports more interpretable explanations of robot behaviour.

How robot body configuration shapes human intervention during approach remains underexplored. We conducted a within-participants study with 41 participants, measuring final stopping distance, subjective comfort, and exploratory eye-tracking responses across four humanoid arm configurations and two spatial scales. Full forward arm extension increased stopping distance by approximately 31-36 cm relative to arms-down. Spatial scale primarily affected comfort and pupil responses without a detectable stopping-distance shift. We introduce the Configuration-Aware Limit Model (CALM), which translates stopping-distance distributions into configuration-dependent population-coverage boundaries. Estimated boundaries at 80% coverage ranged from 0.88 to 1.47 m. In an illustrative one-dimensional planning analysis, reconfiguration enabled a 1.10 m approach goal that was unreachable with arms remaining fully extended under the same nominal pointwise 20% intervention-probability constraint. These findings support treating body configuration as a planning variable while distinguishing physical safety, behavioral intervention, and subjective cost.

Anticipating whether a person will interact from one's own perspective is a highly intuitive task for humans, that relies on a combination of cues. We investigate how humans perform at predicting a person's intention to interact from a service robot's point of view, using pose-only or full video input, then benchmark different lightweight pose-based models and state-of-the-art vision-language models. We conducted our benchmark on the HUI360 dataset on a fixed pilot subset of 100 test tracks (25 positive, 75 negative). We found that with pose-only input, human annotators outperform lightweight trained pose models but not by large margins (+0.08 in F1-Score). But when given full egocentric video with a target bounding box, human annotators perform substantially better and largely outperform the Vision-Language Models (+0.2 in F1-Score). We also compared VLMs of different size and under different input conditions, and found that the best results do not correlate with model size. Our result confirms that predicting interactions is a challenging task for social robots and that reasoning-capable models are necessary but their actual reasoning capabilities alone do not suffice to match the social intuition of humans.

IRWOZ has improved industrial human-robot interaction (HRI) dialogue systems through domain-specific annotations. However, its initial version contains substantial noise in dialogue states and utterances, limiting state-tracking accuracy. We introduce IRWOZ 2.0, which addresses these limitations through large language model (LLM) enhanced generation (Mistral/Claude-3.5) and quality refinements. Our improved dataset expands to 390 dialogues across 4 industrial domains (Assembly, Delivery, Position, Relocation), featuring manual corrections and automated typo removal. Benchmark experiments on dialogue state tracking demonstrate significant improvements, with GPT-2's BLEU-4 score increasing from 0.1651 to 0.5604 compared to original IRWOZ. To support industrial HRI research, we publicly released IRWOZ 2.0 dataset at https://ieee-dataport.org/documents/irwoz-20-large-language-model-driven-dialogue-dataset-industrial-robot-conversations

This paper presents an experimental design for constructing a multimodal dataset to analyze user engagement in human-robot interaction (HRI). Prior studies have mainly relied on observable behavioral cues, with limited frameworks integrating physiological signals. We therefore propose a structured data-collection protocol to build a multimodal dataset that includes wearable physiological signals, behavioral data, and self-report measures under different levels of task complexity defined in this experiment.

Conventional task-level evaluation asks whether a robot policy completes a specified action, but can miss failures that emerge only during physical human contact. This limitation is critical in contact-rich assistive tasks, where meaningful evaluation requires a physically responsive human, interaction-quality assessment beyond task success, and a leak-free observer-scorer protocol. We introduce a physics-consistent benchmark for contact-rich human-robot interaction, instantiated in robot-assisted bathing. The benchmark combines a deformable, passively responding human, physics-aware scores alongside task-level success, and a frozen vision-only / scorer-only evaluation protocol. To establish physical validity, region-wise simulated responses are calibrated against force-indentation measurements from Franka impedance pushes on a medical-care manikin. Under a frozen T1-T7 protocol with 140 runs per method, an LLM-augmented state machine (State Machine) achieves 72.9% task success but drops to 56.4% after correct-region and force-safety screening; VoxPoser produces lighter and more stable contact but completes only 27.9% of trials; and zero-shot pi0.5 achieves 0.7% task success with no correct-region or safety-gated successes. These results show that task completion alone does not imply physically valid contact and motivate physics-aware screening before deployment of contact-rich assistive robot policies.

Existing Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) literature has focused on identifying and structuring errors, failures, conflicts, and knowledge issues (called in this work as contradictions) in domain-specific dialogue-based interactions. However, there is still lack of a formal computational framework to represent and define these contradictions, interoperable and usable across HRI and human-agent interaction (HAI) domains. Thus, this research project aims to capture, represent, and evaluate the notion of (1) dialogue-based collaborative interaction and (2) related contradictions in a foundational ontology. METHONTOLOGY, a systematic approach to build domain-independent ontologies was applied. In the conceptualisation stage of the presented ontology, concepts and models from Activity Theory were used. Preliminary results presented in this short article are: (i) Natural language definitions of dialogues and related contradictions in HRI, (ii) Set Theoretic definitions of dialogues and contradictions, and (iii) First Order Logic (FoL) formulation of the contradiction concepts and three novel principles guiding dialogue-based interactions between humans and robots. In summary, we report on ongoing work to develop a foundational ontology based on Activity Theory called Activity Theory-based foundational ontology (ATFOt) to capture and represent the notion of contradictions in HRI.

Physical human--robot interaction software often couples desired-behavior specification with constrained realization; we treat these as separate layers. A \emph{behavior layer} supplies a desired contact-port acceleration $a_k^{\mathrm{id}}=f_θ(e_k,\dot e_k,F_{h,k})$. A \emph{realization layer} converts it into constrained robot commands and reports total desired-versus-realized acceleration error instead of hiding it in saturation. A same-objective unconstrained counterfactual separates regularization from constraint intervention, while plant data expose model error. This paper implements a receding-horizon quadratic program realizing memoryless affine behaviors. Changing the behavior modifies objective coefficients through $(C_θ,G_θ)$ while the robot-command variable and feasible set remain unchanged. A planar study instantiates impedance and admittance; the same running layer accepts an impedance--admittance--impedance reassignment without reconstruction, under its existing rate limit. On a torque-controlled 7-DOF Franka FR3 in MuJoCo, the runtime freezes task-space dynamics per solve and enforces torque feasibility across its horizon. Under a sustained 20N push, it holds a slack-relaxed workspace boundary to within approximately 0.1--0.2mm, versus 4.4cm (impedance) and 4.7cm (admittance) overshoot from instantaneous clipping. A derated actuator budget then activates the torque constraint: horizon-wide enforcement keeps its frozen-model plan feasible to $2.1\times10^{-4}$N$\cdot$m, whereas a first-step-only ablation plans up to 11.329N$\cdot$m beyond budget; on the executed nonlinear plant, where both share the same local-model error, the gap is smaller but still favors horizon-wide enforcement (0.161 vs.\ 0.380~N$\cdot$m). These results are a focused proof of behavior--realization separation.