Multi-Agent Reasoning

When LLM-based multi-agent systems disagree, current practice treats this as noise to be resolved through consensus. We propose it can be signal. We focus on hate speech moderation, a domain where judgments depend on cultural context and individual value weightings, producing high legitimate disagreement among human annotators. We hypothesize that convergent disagreement, where agents reason similarly but conclude differently, indicates genuine value pluralism that humans also struggle to resolve. Using the Measuring Hate Speech corpus, we embed reasoning traces from five perspective-differentiated agents and classify disagreement patterns using a four-category taxonomy based on reasoning similarity and conclusion agreement. We find that raw reasoning divergence weakly predicts human annotator conflict, but the structure of agent discord carries additional signal: cases where agents agree on a verdict show markedly lower human disagreement than cases where they do not, with large effect sizes (d>0.8) surviving correction for multiple comparisons. Our taxonomy-based ordering correlates with human disagreement patterns. These preliminary findings motivate a shift from consensus-seeking to uncertainty-surfacing multi-agent design, where disagreement structure - not magnitude - guides when human judgment is needed.

AI agents operating over extended time horizons accumulate experiences that serve multiple concurrent goals, and must often maintain conflicting interpretations of the same events. A concession during a client negotiation encodes as a trust-building investment'' for one strategic goal and a contractual liability'' for another. Current memory architectures assume a single correct encoding, or at best support multiple views over unified storage. We propose Rashomon Memory: an architecture where parallel goal-conditioned agents encode experiences according to their priorities and negotiate at query time through argumentation. Each perspective maintains its own ontology and knowledge graph. At retrieval, perspectives propose interpretations, critique each other's proposals using asymmetric domain knowledge, and Dung's argumentation semantics determines which proposals survive. The resulting attack graph is itself an explanation: it records which interpretation was selected, which alternatives were considered, and on what grounds they were rejected. We present a proof-of-concept showing that retrieval modes (selection, composition, conflict surfacing) emerge from attack graph topology, and that the conflict surfacing mode, where the system reports genuine disagreement rather than forcing resolution, lets decision-makers see the underlying interpretive conflict directly.

Majority voting is the standard for aggregating multi-agent responses into a final decision. However, traditional methods typically require all agents to complete their reasoning before aggregation begins, leading to significant computational overhead, as many responses become redundant once a majority consensus is achieved. In this work, we formulate efficient multi-agent voting as a reliability-aware agent scheduling problem and propose Efficient Majority-then-Stopping (EMS) to improve reasoning efficiency. EMS first estimates a Task-Conditioned Reliability Ordering (TCRO) for each agent by retrieving its historical consensus evidence on semantically similar queries, and then invoking agents in descending reliability order. Next, Adaptive Incremental Voting (AIV) terminates the process once the current leading answer cannot be overturned by any possible votes from the remaining agents, and returns this answer. Finally, Reliability History Updating (RHU) updates only the invoked agents according to their consensus with the final decision. Extensive evaluations across five benchmarks show that EMS preserves the accuracy of Majority Voting while reducing the average number of invoked agents by 35% and token consumption by 44%, respectively. The code is available at https://github.com/fuyu66/EMS.

Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) is a collaborative framework in which multiple agents iteratively refine solutions through the generation of reasoning and alternating critique cycles. Current work primarily optimizes intra-round topologies and inter-round interactions separately, limiting the adaptation of token costs to task complexity. This work introduces Heterogeneous Consensus-Progressive Reasoning for Efficient Multi-Agent Debate (HCP-MAD), leveraging consensus as a dynamic signal to facilitate progressive reasoning. The core motivation is that a majority of straightforward tasks can be effectively resolved via lightweight pair-agent debates, while complex tasks require expanded collaboration. Firstly, Heterogeneous Consensus Verification conducts rapid consensus verification using a pair of heterogeneous agents for early stopping. Next, Heterogeneous Pair-Agent Debate applies an adaptive stopping criterion to terminate mutual critique of reasoning traces. Finally, the unresolved tasks are addressed through Escalated Collective Voting by aggregating diverse perspectives from additional agents. Experiments across six benchmarks show that HCP-MAD enhances accuracy while substantially reducing token costs. Code is https://github.com/fuyu66/HCP-MAD.

Chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation is a fundamental yet complex clinical task that increasingly relies on artificial intelligence for automation. However, traditional monolithic models often lack the nuanced reasoning required for trustworthy diagnosis, frequently leading to logical inconsistencies and diagnostic hallucinations. While multi-agent systems offer a potential solution by simulating collaborative consultations, existing frameworks remain susceptible to consensus-based errors when instantiated by a single underlying model. This paper introduces XrayClaw, a novel framework that operationalizes multi-agent alignment through a sophisticated cooperative-competitive architecture. XrayClaw integrates four specialized cooperative agents to simulate a systematic clinical workflow, alongside a competitive agent that serves as an independent auditor. To reconcile these distinct diagnostic pathways, we propose Competitive Preference Optimization, a learning objective that penalizes illogical reasoning by enforcing mutual verification between analytical and holistic interpretations. Extensive empirical evaluations on the MS-CXR-T, MIMIC-CXR, and CheXbench benchmarks demonstrate that XrayClaw achieves state-of-the-art performance in diagnostic accuracy, clinical reasoning fidelity, and zero-shot domain generalization. Our results indicate that XrayClaw effectively mitigates cumulative hallucinations and enhances the overall reliability of automated CXR diagnosis, establishing a new paradigm for trustworthy medical imaging analysis.

Recent work reports strong performance from multi-agent LLM systems (MAS), but these gains are often confounded by increased test-time computation. When computation is normalized, single-agent systems (SAS) can match or outperform MAS, yet the theoretical basis and evaluation methodology behind this comparison remain unclear. We present an information-theoretic argument, grounded in the Data Processing Inequality, suggesting that under a fixed reasoning-token budget and with perfect context utilization, single-agent systems are more information-efficient. This perspective further predicts that multi-agent systems become competitive when a single agent's effective context utilization is degraded, or when more compute is expended. We test these predictions in a controlled empirical study across three model families (Qwen3, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama, and Gemini 2.5), comparing SAS with multiple MAS architectures under matched budgets. We find that SAS consistently match or outperform MAS on multi-hop reasoning tasks when reasoning tokens are held constant. Beyond aggregate performance, we conduct a detailed diagnostic analysis of system behavior and evaluation methodology. We identify significant artifacts in API-based budget control (particularly in Gemini 2.5) and in standard benchmarks, both of which can inflate apparent gains from MAS. Overall, our results suggest that, for multi-hop reasoning tasks, many reported advantages of multi-agent systems are better explained by unaccounted computation and context effects rather than inherent architectural benefits, and highlight the importance of understanding and explicitly controlling the trade-offs between compute, context, and coordination in agentic systems.

While large language model-based multi-agent systems have shown strong potential for complex reasoning, how to effectively organize multiple agents remains an open question. In this paper, we introduce OrgAgent, a company-style hierarchical multi-agent framework that separates collaboration into governance, execution, and compliance layers. OrgAgent decomposes multi-agent reasoning into three layers: a governance layer for planning and resource allocation, an execution layer for task solving and review, and a compliance layer for final answer control. By evaluating the framework across reasoning tasks, LLMs, execution modes, and execution policies, we find that multi-agent systems organized in a company-style hierarchy generally outperform other organizational structures. Besides, hierarchical coordination also reduces token consumption relative to flat collaboration in most settings. For example, for GPT-OSS-120B, the hierarchical setting improves performance over flat multi-agent system by 102.73% while reducing token usage by 74.52% on SQuAD 2.0. Further analysis shows that hierarchy helps most when tasks benefit from stable skill assignment, controlled information flow, and layered verification. Overall, our findings highlight organizational structure as an important factor in multi-agent reasoning, shaping not only effectiveness and cost, but also coordination behavior.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in completing various tasks. However, solving complex problems often requires the coordination of multiple agents, raising a fundamental question: how to effectively select and interconnect these agents. In this paper, we propose Agent Q-Mix, a reinforcement learning framework that reformulates topology selection as a cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) problem. Our method learns decentralized communication decisions using QMIX value factorization, where each agent selects from a set of communication actions that jointly induce a round-wise communication graph. At its core, Agent Q-Mix combines a topology-aware GNN encoder, GRU memory, and per-agent Q-heads under a Centralized Training with Decentralized Execution (CTDE) paradigm. The framework optimizes a reward function that balances task accuracy with token cost. Across seven core benchmarks in coding, reasoning, and mathematics, Agent Q-Mix achieves the highest average accuracy compared to existing methods while demonstrating superior token efficiency and robustness against agent failure. Notably, on the challenging Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) using Gemini-3.1-Flash-Lite as a backbone, Agent Q-Mix achieves 20.8% accuracy, outperforming Microsoft Agent Framework (19.2%) and LangGraph (19.2%), followed by AutoGen and Lobster by OpenClaw. These results underscore the effectiveness of learned, decentralized topology optimization in pushing the boundaries of multi-agent reasoning.

Clinical diagnosis is a complex reasoning process in which clinicians gather evidence, form hypotheses, and test them against alternative explanations. In medical training, this reasoning is explicitly developed through counterfactual questioning--e.g., asking how a diagnosis would change if a key symptom were absent or altered--to strengthen differential diagnosis skills. As large language model (LLM)-based systems are increasingly used for diagnostic support, ensuring the interpretability of their recommendations becomes critical. However, most existing LLM-based diagnostic agents reason over fixed clinical evidence without explicitly testing how individual findings support or weaken competing diagnoses. In this work, we propose a counterfactual multi-agent diagnostic framework inspired by clinician training that makes hypothesis testing explicit and evidence-grounded. Our framework introduces counterfactual case editing to modify clinical findings and evaluate how these changes affect competing diagnoses. We further define the Counterfactual Probability Gap, a method that quantifies how strongly individual findings support a diagnosis by measuring confidence shifts under these edits. These counterfactual signals guide multi-round specialist discussions, enabling agents to challenge unsupported hypotheses, refine differential diagnoses, and produce more interpretable reasoning trajectories. Across three diagnostic benchmarks and seven LLMs, our method consistently improves diagnostic accuracy over prompting and prior multi-agent baselines, with the largest gains observed in complex and ambiguous cases. Human evaluation further indicates that our framework produces more clinically useful, reliable, and coherent reasoning. These results suggest that incorporating counterfactual evidence verification is an important step toward building reliable AI systems for clinical decision support.

Miscalibrated confidence scores are a practical obstacle to deploying AI in clinical settings. A model that is always overconfident offers no useful signal for deferral. We present a multi-agent framework that combines domain-specific specialist agents with Two-Phase Verification (Wu et al., 2024) and S-Score Weighted Fusion to improve both calibration and discrimination in medical multiple-choice question answering. Four specialist agents (respiratory, cardiology, neurology, gastroenterology) generate independent diagnoses using Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. Each diagnosis undergoes a two-phase self-verification process that measures internal consistency and produces a Specialist Confidence Score (S-score). The S-scores drive a weighted fusion strategy that selects the final answer and calibrates the reported confidence. We evaluate on high-disagreement subsets of MedQA-USMLE and MedMCQA (100 and 250 questions). All results are specific to this filtered regime. On MedQA-250, the full system achieves ECE = 0.091 (74.4% reduction over the single-specialist baseline) and AUROC = 0.630 (+0.056) at 59.2% accuracy. Calibration gains of 49-74% hold across all four settings. Ablation analysis reveals that Two-Phase Verification drives ECE reduction while multi-agent reasoning drives AUROC improvement, suggesting that consistency checking and ensemble aggregation address different failure modes of LLM uncertainty. Whether the resulting confidence signal is sufficient to support clinical deferral decisions in practice remains a direction for future investigation.

Multi-agent collaboration has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, yet it suffers from interaction-level ambiguity that blurs generation, critique, and revision, making credit assignment across agents difficult. Moreover, policy optimization in this setting is vulnerable to heavy-tailed and noisy rewards, which can bias advantage estimation and trigger unstable or even divergent training. To address both issues, we propose a robust multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for collaborative reasoning, consisting of two components: Dual-Agent Answer-Critique-Rewrite (DACR) and an Adaptive Robust Estimator (ARE). DACR decomposes reasoning into a structured three-stage pipeline: answer, critique, and rewrite, while enabling explicit attribution of each agent's marginal contribution to its partner's performance. ARE provides robust estimation of batch experience means during multi-agent policy optimization. Across mathematical reasoning and embodied intelligence benchmarks, even under noisy rewards, our method consistently outperforms the baseline in both homogeneous and heterogeneous settings. These results indicate stronger robustness to reward noise and more stable training dynamics, effectively preventing optimization failures caused by noisy reward signals.

Automatic Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) generation has emerged as a promising paradigm for solving complex reasoning tasks. However, existing frameworks are fundamentally bottlenecked when applied to knowledge-intensive domains (e.g., healthcare and law). They either rely on a static library of general nodes like Chain-of-Thought, which lack specialized expertise, or attempt to generate nodes on the fly. In the latter case, the orchestrator is not only bound by its internal knowledge limits but must also simultaneously generate domain-specific logic and optimize high-level topology, leading to a severe architectural coupling that degrades overall system efficacy. To bridge this gap, we propose Unified-MAS that decouples granular node implementation from topological orchestration via offline node synthesis. Unified-MAS operates in two stages: (1) Search-Based Node Generation retrieves external open-world knowledge to synthesize specialized node blueprints, overcoming the internal knowledge limits of LLMs; and (2) Reward-Based Node Optimization utilizes a perplexity-guided reward to iteratively enhance the internal logic of bottleneck nodes. Extensive experiments across four specialized domains demonstrate that integrating Unified-MAS into four Automatic-MAS baselines yields a better performance-cost trade-off, achieving up to a 14.2% gain while significantly reducing costs. Further analysis reveals its robustness across different designer LLMs and its effectiveness on conventional tasks such as mathematical reasoning.

Modern seismic networks resolve earthquake sequences in unprecedented detail, yet explaining how large earthquakes emerge from evolving fault systems remains difficult. We introduce TRACE, a seismology-guided artificial intelligence agent that plans and executes workflows while preserving auditable evidence chains from observations to physical interpretation. We evaluated TRACE through 104 benchmark tasks and two complementary earthquake sequences. For the well-studied 2019 Ridgecrest sequence, TRACE constructed a high-resolution catalog from continuous waveforms and retrospectively recovered delayed cascading activation between the Mw 6.4 and Mw 7.1 earthquakes without a prescribed target interpretation. In the less-understood 2025-2026 Sanriku sequence off northeastern Japan, TRACE developed a testable interpretation of progressive destabilization within a segmented megathrust. Its synthesis linked coupled seismic-aseismic activation around the MJ 6.9 sequence and subsequent persistent, spatially segmented shallow-interface activity to a megathrust patch that lay between regions of past large coseismic slip and later hosted the MJ 7.7 rupture. These results open a path from seismic observations to testable physical insight.

Multi-Agent Debate has emerged as a promising framework for improving the reasoning quality of large language models through iterative inter-agent communication. However, broadcasting all agent messages at every round introduces noise and redundancy that can degrade debate quality and waste computational resources. Current approaches rely on uncertainty estimation to filter low-confidence responses before broadcasting, but this approach is unreliable due to miscalibrated confidence scores and sensitivity to threshold selection. To address this, we propose Diversity-Aware Retention (DAR), a lightweight debate framework that, at each debate round, selects the subset of agent responses that maximally disagree with each other and with the majority vote before broadcasting. Through an explicit index-based retention mechanism, DAR preserves the original messages without modification, ensuring that retained disagreements remain authentic. Experiments on diverse reasoning and question answering benchmarks demonstrate that our selective message propagation consistently improves debate performance, particularly as the number of agents scales, where noise accumulation is most severe. Our results highlight that what agents hear is as important as what agents say in multi-agent reasoning systems. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/DA2I2-SLM/DAR.

Rapid identification of hazardous events is essential for next-generation Earth Observation (EO) missions supporting disaster response. However, current monitoring pipelines remain largely ground-centric, introducing latency due to downlink limitations, multi-source data fusion constraints, and the computational cost of exhaustive scene analysis. This work proposes a hierarchical multi-agent architecture for onboard EO processing under strict resource and bandwidth constraints. The system enables the exploitation of complementary multimodal observations by coordinating specialized AI agents within an event-driven decision pipeline. AI agents can be deployed across multiple nodes in a distributed setting, such as satellite platforms. An Early Warning agent generates fast hypotheses from onboard observations and selectively activates domain-specific analysis agents, while a Decision agent consolidates the evidence to issue a final alert. The architecture combines vision-language models, traditional remote sensing analysis tools, and role-specialized agents to enable structured reasoning over multimodal observations while minimizing unnecessary computation. A proof-of-concept implementation was executed on the engineering model of an edge-computing platform currently deployed in orbit, using representative satellite data. Experiments on wildfire and flood monitoring scenarios show that the proposed routing-based pipeline significantly reduces computational overhead while maintaining coherent decision outputs, demonstrating the feasibility of distributed agent-based reasoning for future autonomous EO constellations.

The widespread adoption of dashcams has made video evidence in traffic accidents increasingly abundant, yet transforming "what happened in the video" into "who is responsible under which legal provisions" still relies heavily on human experts. Existing ego-view traffic accident studies mainly focus on perception and semantic understanding, while LLM-based legal methods are mostly built on textual case descriptions and rarely incorporate video evidence, leaving a clear gap between the two. We first propose C-TRAIL, a multimodal legal dataset that, under the Chinese traffic regulation system, explicitly aligns dashcam videos and textual descriptions with a closed set of responsibility modes and their corresponding Chinese traffic statutes. On this basis, we introduce a two-stage framework: (1) a traffic accident understanding module that generates textual video descriptions; and (2) a legal multi-agent framework that outputs responsibility modes, statute sets, and complete judgment reports. Experimental results on C-TRAIL and MM-AU show that our method outperforms general and legal LLMs, as well as existing agent-based approaches, while providing a transparent and interpretable legal reasoning process.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable reliability and advanced capabilities through extended test-time reasoning. However, extending these capabilities to Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remains a significant challenge due to a critical scarcity of high-quality, long-chain reasoning data and optimized training pipelines. To bridge this gap, we present a unified multi-agent visual reasoning framework that systematically evolves from our foundational image-centric model, Insight-V, into a generalized spatial-temporal architecture, Insight-V++. We first propose a scalable data generation pipeline equipped with multi-granularity assessment that autonomously synthesizes structured, complex reasoning trajectories across image and video domains without human intervention. Recognizing that directly supervising MLLMs with such intricate data yields sub-optimal results, we design a dual-agent architecture comprising a reasoning agent to execute extensive analytical chains, and a summary agent to critically evaluate and distill final outcomes. While our initial framework utilized Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), its off-policy nature fundamentally constrained reinforcement learning potential. To overcome these limitations, particularly for long-horizon video understanding, Insight-V++ introduces two novel algorithms, ST-GRPO and J-GRPO, which enhance spatial-temporal reasoning and improve evaluative robustness. Crucially, by leveraging reliable feedback from the summary agent, we guide an iterative reasoning path generation process, retraining the entire multi-agent system in a continuous, self-improving loop. Extensive experiments on base models like LLaVA-NeXT and Qwen2.5-VL demonstrate significant performance gains across challenging image and video reasoning benchmarks while preserving strong capabilities on traditional perception-focused tasks.

Optimizing Register Transfer Level (RTL) code is a critical step in Electronic Design Automation (EDA) for improving power, performance, and area (PPA). We present CODMAS (Collaborative Optimization via a Dialectic Multi-Agent System), a framework that combines structured dialectic reasoning with domain-aware code generation and deterministic evaluation to automate RTL optimization. At the core of CODMAS are two dialectic agents: the Articulator, inspired by rubber-duck debugging, which articulates stepwise transformation plans and exposes latent assumptions; and the Hypothesis Partner, which predicts outcomes and reconciles deviations between expected and actual behavior to guide targeted refinements. These agents direct a Domain-Specific Coding Agent (DCA) to generate architecture-aware Verilog edits and a Code Evaluation Agent (CEA) to verify syntax, functionality, and PPA metrics. We introduce RTLOPT, a benchmark of 120 Verilog triples (unoptimized, optimized, testbench) for pipelining and clock-gating transformations. Across proprietary and open LLMs, CODMAS achieves ~25% reduction in critical path delay for pipelining and ~22% power reduction for clock gating, while reducing functional and compilation failures compared to strong prompting and agentic baselines. These results demonstrate that structured multi-agent reasoning can significantly enhance automated RTL optimization and scale to more complex designs and broader optimization tasks.

Theory of Mind (ToM) refers to the ability to reason about others' mental states, and higher-order ToM involves considering that others also possess their own ToM. Equipping large language model (LLM)-driven agents with ToM has long been considered to improve their coordination in multiagent collaborative tasks. However, we find that misaligned ToM orders-mismatches in the depth of ToM reasoning between agents-can lead to insufficient or excessive reasoning about others, thereby impairing their coordination. To address this issue, we design an adaptive ToM (A-ToM) agent, which can align in ToM orders with its partner. Based on prior interactions, the agent estimates the partner's likely ToM order and leverages this estimation to predict the partner's action, thereby facilitating behavioral coordination. We conduct empirical evaluations on four multi-agent coordination tasks: a repeated matrix game, two grid navigation tasks and an Overcooked task. The results validate our findings on ToM alignment and demonstrate the effectiveness of our A-ToM agent. Furthermore, we discuss the generalizability of our A-ToM to non-LLM-based agents, as well as what would diminish the importance of ToM alignment.

Large language models and AI agents have recently shown promise in automating software performance optimization, but existing approaches predominantly rely on local, syntax-driven code transformations. This limits their ability to reason about program behavior and capture whole system performance interactions. As modern software increasingly comprises interacting components - such as microservices, databases, and shared infrastructure - effective code optimization requires reasoning about program structure and system architecture beyond individual functions or files. This paper explores the feasibility of whole system optimization for microservices. We introduce a multi-agent framework that integrates control-flow and data-flow representations with architectural and cross-component dependency signals to support system-level performance reasoning. The proposed system is decomposed into coordinated agent roles - summarization, analysis, optimization, and verification - that collaboratively identify cross-cutting bottlenecks and construct multi-step optimization strategies spanning the software stack. We present a proof-of-concept on a microservice-based system that illustrates the effectiveness of our proposed framework, achieving a 36.58% improvement in throughput and a 27.81% reduction in average response time.

This paper presents a multi-agent perception-action exploration alliance, dubbed A4VL, for efficient long-video reasoning. A4VL operates in a multi-round perception-action exploration loop with a selection of VLM agents. In each round, the team of agents performs video question-answer (VideoQA) via perception exploration followed by action exploration. During perception exploration, each agent learns to extract query-specific perception clue(s) from a few sampled frames and performs clue-based alignment to find the video block(s) that are most relevant to the query-specific event. During action exploration, A4VL performs video reasoning in three steps: (1) each agent produces its initial answer with rational, (2) all agents collaboratively scores one another through cross-reviews and relevance ranking, and (3) based on whether a satisfactory consensus is reached, the decision is made either to start a new round of perception-action deliberation by pruning (e.g., filtering out the lowest performing agent) and re-staging (e.g., new-clue and matching block based perception-action exploration), or to conclude by producing its final answer. The integration of the multi-agent alliance through multi-round perception-action exploration, coupled with event-driven partitioning and cue-guided block alignment, enables A4VL to effectively scale to real world long videos while preserving high quality video reasoning. Evaluation Results on five popular VideoQA benchmarks show that A4VL outperforms 18 existing representative VLMs and 11 recent methods optimized for long-video reasoning, while achieving significantly lower inference latency. Our code is released at https://github.com/git-disl/A4VL.

Multi-agent LLM systems increasingly tackle complex reasoning, yet their interaction patterns remain limited to voting, unstructured debate, or pipeline orchestration. None model deliberation: a phased process where differentiated participants exchange typed reasoning moves, preserve disagreements, and converge on accountable outcomes. We introduce Deliberative Collective Intelligence (DCI), specifying four reasoning archetypes, 14 typed epistemic acts, a shared workspace, and DCI-CF, a convergent flow algorithm that guarantees termination with a structured decision packet containing the selected option, residual objections, minority report, and reopen conditions. We evaluate on 45 tasks across seven domains using Gemini 2.5 Flash. On non-routine tasks (n=40), DCI significantly improves over unstructured debate (+0.95, 95% CI [+0.41, +1.54]). DCI excels on hidden-profile tasks requiring perspective integration (9.56, highest of any system on any domain) while failing on routine decisions (5.39), confirming task-dependence. DCI produces 100% structured decision packets and 98% minority reports, artifacts absent from all baselines. However, DCI consumes ~62x single-agent tokens, and single-agent generation outperforms DCI on overall quality. DCI's contribution is not that more agents are better, but that consequential decisions benefit from deliberative structure when process accountability justifies the cost.

The integration of Large Language Models into Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) has enabled the so-lution of complex, long-horizon tasks through collaborative reasoning. However, this collec-tive intelligence is inherently fragile, as a single logical fallacy can rapidly propagate and lead to system-wide failure. Most current research re-lies on post-hoc failure analysis, thereby hinder-ing real-time intervention. To address this, we propose PROMAS, a proactive framework utiliz-ing Markov transitions for predictive error anal-ysis. PROMAS extracts Causal Delta Features to capture semantic displacement, mapping them to a quantized Vector Markov Space to model reasoning as probabilistic transitions. By inte-grating a Proactive Prediction Head with Jump Detection, the method localizes errors via risk acceleration rather than static thresholds. On the Who&When benchmark, PROMAS achieves 22.97% step-level accuracy while processing only 27% of reasoning logs. This performance rivals reactive monitors like MASC while reducing data overhead by 73%. Although this strategy entails an accuracy trade-off compared to post-hoc meth-ods, it significantly improves intervention latency, balancing diagnostic precision with the real-time demands of autonomous reasoning.

Millimeter-wave or terahertz communications can meet demands of low-altitude economy networks for high-throughput sensing and real-time decision making. However, high-frequency characteristics of wireless channels result in severe propagation loss and strong beam directivity, which make beam prediction challenging in highly mobile uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAV) scenarios. In this paper, we employ agentic AI to enable the transformation of mmWave base stations toward embodied intelligence. We innovatively design a multi-agent collaborative reasoning architecture for UAV-to-ground mmWave communications and propose a hybrid beam prediction model system based on bimodal data. The multi-agent architecture is designed to overcome the limited context window and weak controllability of large language model (LLM)-based reasoning by decomposing beam prediction into task analysis, solution planning, and completeness assessment. To align with the agentic reasoning process, a hybrid beam prediction model system is developed to process multimodal UAV data, including numeric mobility information and visual observations. The proposed hybrid model system integrates Mamba-based temporal modelling, convolutional visual encoding, and cross-attention-based multimodal fusion, and dynamically switches data-flow strategies under multi-agent guidance. Extensive simulations on a real UAV mmWave communication dataset demonstrate that proposed architecture and system achieve high prediction accuracy and robustness under diverse data conditions, with maximum top-1 accuracy reaching 96.57%.

Breast ultrasound diagnosis typically proceeds from global lesion localization to local sign assessment and then evidence integration to assign a BI-RADS category and determine benignity or malignancy. Many existing methods rely on end-to-end prediction or provide only weakly grounded evidence, which can miss fine-grained lesion cues and limit auditability and clinical review. To align with the clinical workflow and improve evidence traceability, we propose a hierarchical multi-agent framework, termed UltrasoundAgents. A main agent localizes the lesion in the full image and triggers a crop-and-zoom operation. A sub-agent analyzes the local view and predicts four clinically relevant attributes, namely echogenicity pattern, calcification, boundary type, and edge (margin) morphology. The main agent then integrates these structured attributes to perform evidence-based reasoning and output the BI-RADS category and the malignancy prediction, while producing reviewable intermediate evidence. Furthermore, hierarchical multi-agent training often suffers from error propagation, difficult credit assignment, and sparse rewards. To alleviate this and improve training stability, we introduce a decoupled progressive training strategy. We first train the attribute agent, then train the main agent with oracle attributes to learn robust attribute-based reasoning, and finally apply corrective trajectory self-distillation with spatial supervision to build high-quality trajectories for supervised fine-tuning, yielding a deployable end-to-end policy. Experiments show consistent gains over strong vision-language baselines in diagnostic accuracy and attribute agreement, together with structured evidence and traceable reasoning.

Most multi-agent systems rely exclusively on autoregressive language models (ARMs) that are based on sequential generation. Although effective for fluent text, ARMs limit global reasoning and plan revision. On the other hand, Discrete Diffusion Language Models (DDLMs) enable non-sequential, globally revisable generation and have shown strong planning capabilities, but their limited text fluency hinders direct collaboration with ARMs. We introduce Latent-DARM, a latent-space communication framework bridging DDLM (planners) and ARM (executors), maximizing collaborative benefits. Across mathematical, scientific, and commonsense reasoning benchmarks, Latent-DARM outperforms text-based interfaces on average, improving accuracy from 27.0% to 36.0% on DART-5 and from 0.0% to 14.0% on AIME2024. Latent-DARM approaches the results of state-of-the-art reasoning models while using less than 2.2% of its token budget. This work advances multi-agent collaboration among agents with heterogeneous models.

Long video understanding is challenging due to dense visual redundancy, long-range temporal dependencies, and the tendency of chain-of-thought and retrieval-based agents to accumulate semantic drift and correlation-driven errors. We argue that long-video reasoning should begin not with reactive retrieval, but with deliberate task formulation: the model must first articulate what must be true in the video for each candidate answer to hold. This thinking-before-finding principle motivates VideoHV-Agent, a framework that reformulates video question answering as a structured hypothesis-verification process. Based on video summaries, a Thinker rewrites answer candidates into testable hypotheses, a Judge derives a discriminative clue specifying what evidence must be checked, a Verifier grounds and tests the clue using localized, fine-grained video content, and an Answer agent integrates validated evidence to produce the final answer. Experiments on three long-video understanding benchmarks show that VideoHV-Agent achieves state-of-the-art accuracy while providing enhanced interpretability, improved logical soundness, and lower computational cost. We make our code publicly available at: https://github.com/Haorane/VideoHV-Agent.

Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in tool use, reasoning, and code generation, yet single-agent systems exhibit fundamental limitations when confronted with complex research tasks demanding multi-source synthesis, adversarial verification, and personalized delivery. We present DOVA (Deep Orchestrated Versatile Agent), a multi-agent platform introducing three key innovations: (1) deliberation-first orchestration, where explicit meta-reasoning precedes tool invocation, informed by a persistent user model and entity-aware conversation context; (2) hybrid collaborative reasoning, a composable three-phase pipeline unifying ensemble diversity, blackboard transparency, and iterative refinement; and (3) adaptive multi-tiered thinking, a six-level token-budget allocation scheme that reduces inference cost by 40-60% on simple tasks while preserving deep reasoning capacity. We formalize the core algorithms, present an architectural ablation study across seven system configurations, and analyze the contribution of each component to answer confidence, source coverage, and token efficiency.

Mathematical concepts emerge through an interplay of processes, including experimentation, efforts at proof, and counterexamples. In this paper, we present a new multi-agent model for computational mathematical discovery based on this observation. Our system, conceived with research in mind, poses its own conjectures and then attempts to prove them, making decisions informed by this feedback and an evolving data distribution. Inspired by the history of Euler's conjecture for polyhedra and an open challenge in the literature, we benchmark with the task of autonomously recovering the concept of homology from polyhedral data and knowledge of linear algebra. Our system completes this learning problem. Most importantly, the experiments are ablations, statistically testing the value of the complete dynamic and controlling for experimental setup. They support our main claim: that the optimisation of the right combination of local processes can lead to surprisingly well-aligned notions of mathematical interestingness.

Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) remains challenging for existing Vision-Language Models (VLMs), especially under complex reasoning and multi-step workflows. Current approaches struggle to decompose intricate questions into manageable sub-tasks and often fail to leverage specialized processing paths for different document elements. We present ORCA: Orchestrated Reasoning with Collaborative Agents for Document Visual Question Answering, a novel multi-agent framework that addresses these limitations through strategic agent coordination and iterative refinement. ORCA begins with a reasoning agent that decomposes queries into logical steps, followed by a routing mechanism that activates task-specific agents from a specialized agent dock. Our framework leverages a set of specialized AI agents, each dedicated to a distinct modality, enabling fine-grained understanding and collaborative reasoning across diverse document components. To ensure answer reliability, ORCA employs a debate mechanism with stress-testing, and when necessary, a thesis-antithesis adjudication process. This is followed by a sanity checker to ensure format consistency. Extensive experiments on three benchmarks demonstrate that our approach achieves significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods, establishing a new paradigm for collaborative agent systems in vision-language reasoning.