Multi-Task Learning
Overview
Multi-task learning studies how one model can learn several related predictions at once, using shared information to improve accuracy, data efficiency, or deployment cost. Common designs combine a shared encoder with task-specific heads, adapters, or routed experts; other methods balance losses, adjust conflicting gradients, or group tasks by affinity. Applications range from dense vision benchmarks such as NYUv2 and Cityscapes to language, medical prediction, recommendation, and scientific modeling. The central tension is positive versus negative transfer: sharing can help when tasks have useful common structure, but differences in data, objectives, or capacity can cause gains for some tasks and losses for others.
Latest papers
391 papers50 papers in the last four weeks, up 16% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.
BTI-Net: Bidirectional Decoder-Level Task Interaction via Uncertainty-Aware Gating for Multi-Task Medical Image Analysis
RecallRisk-BERT: A Multi-Task Framework for Post-Report Medical Device Recall Triage
Towards Explainable Adjudicative Variance: Quantifying Judicial Discretion via Gated Multi-Task Learning
Learning to Recover Task Experts from a Multi-Task Merged Model
Intracranial Aneurysm Classification and Segmentation via Tri-Axial ROI and Multi-Task Learning
Temporally Consistent Label Interpolation for Robust Surgical Multi-Task Learning under Challenging Conditions
A multi-task spatiotemporal deep neural network for predicting penetration depth and morphology in laser welding
Blasto-Net: An Explainable Multi-Task Learning for Blastocyst Segmentation, Grading, and Implantation Prediction
SURGELLM: Rethinking Multi-Task Evaluation through Task-Aware Feature Gating with Class-Balanced Normalization
[CLS]; provably degenerates to identity when features are uninformative), task-conditioned prefix tokens (quantized feature values and task identity prepended to every input), and Instance-Weighted Normalization (IWN; removes class-prior bias from gate statistics). We prove an excess-risk bound linking gate benefit to surgical feature alignment. Across four tasks, SST-2, multi-hop retrieval, LLM-prompt attribution, and authorship detection, covering 17,830 examples and eleven model variants over three seeds, the IWN variant achieves macro-F1 0.940 ( over the strongest non-IWN baseline; on authorship detection). A random-vocabulary control ( avg.\ F1) confirms gains are lexical, not parametric. Code, vocabularies, and a -recovery auto-extraction recipe are released.