Narratives

This paper introduces and operationalizes summarization bias: a proposed systematic tendency of large language models (LLMs) to represent narrative meaning as an abstract summary label rather than as the reconstructable inferential structure that produces it. Within the Bulut Doctrine, narrative effect is theorized along a told-shown axis: in told mode, emotional and informational content is declared explicitly and requires little reader reconstruction; in shown mode, that content is suppressed at the surface and must be reconstructed from physical cues and indirection (Objective Projection). Shown mode is the higher-load condition the doctrine is designed to measure. The claim is that LLMs fail along this axis in a specific direction. Summarization bias is hypothesized to operate in two regimes: (i) a generative regime, in which a model asked to render an emotion through Objective Projection defaults to declaring it instead; and (ii) an evaluative regime, in which a model judging narrative quality rewards told-mode explicitness and under-detects shown-mode suppression. The evaluative regime is the more consequential, since LLMs increasingly serve as judges and reward models, and a directional bias toward told mode would impose a selection pressure degrading prose toward flat declaration. This report does not claim the bias is validated. It defines the construct, situates it against LLM-as-judge biases, rereads a completed independent reliability study as directional evidence consistent with it, and pre-registers a two-regime test with decision rules under which the construct would be abandoned.

Many operational cases are documented more than once, at different workflow stages and for different purposes, yet model evaluations normally select one of these records before model comparison begins. We treat that selection as part of the evaluation and compare matched records of the same cases under fixed labels and splits in three systems: GE Aerospace repair events, NASA ASRS safety reports and NHTSA vehicle recalls. Across the three GE fields, for events whose label comes from parts transactions independently of the narratives, held-out macro-F1 ranged from 0.33 to 0.91. A difference of 0.46 separated the customer report, written before shop work, from the technician report, written after diagnosis but before the transaction that generates the label. That difference is substantially larger than the representation and architecture differences tested on the same events. The public systems showed different patterns: the NHTSA defect summary remained strongest under every model family tested, whereas the ASRS analyst synopsis outperformed the reporter narrative under learned sequence models but not under lexical baselines. Secondary analyses showed that some model comparisons were also record-dependent. Evaluations should be run on the information available at the intended decision point and should report how both the record and the label were produced.

Word-level detectors identify unedited AI-generated text almost perfectly, but the literature documents their brittleness under rewording, and a word-level score neither characterizes a text nor identifies which AI model wrote it. We ask whether AI-generated text can be identified one level deeper, from structural signatures: how information is presented, in what order, with what evidence, and in what voice. We replicate StoryScope (Russell et al., 2026), which showed such patterns for AI-generated fiction, on commercial content: 2,250 pre-ChatGPT human blog posts from 268 company domains against 11,250 AI mirrors from five frontier models. A 214-feature instrument, applied by an LLM and validated in a human gold-annotation session (human-human kappa 0.928, human-model 0.946), detects AI posts from its 187 structural features alone at 98.0 macro-F1 on held-out companies, unchanged (98.1) when every AI post is reworded by its own model. The signal characterizes and attributes: AI posts share a tidy, self-announcing shape, 79.3% are attributed to the correct source against a 16.7% chance rate, and human posts occupy rare structural configurations. All effects replicate StoryScope's, consistent in direction and larger in magnitude. We release pipeline, instrument, prompts, code, and aggregate artifacts.

LLMs have been able to generate fluent prose, but high-quality stories also require coordinated decisions about plot, character, and language across planning, drafting, and revision. We formulate Vibe Narrativizing as turning natural-language writing requirements into a finished story. MUSE, a Theory-Harnessed Story Engine, addresses two bottlenecks: rule quality and sustained rule realization. Story theory supplies the rules, and a practical agent harness puts them to work. Knowledge engineering organizes Robert McKee's theory through rule atomization, semantic consolidation, mechanism abstraction, a single source of truth, and layered disclosure; typical examples clarify judgments that depend on context and aesthetic purpose. The harness preserves story decisions in intermediate deliverables across design, character performance, scene composition, and revision. Context engineering supplies each role with relevant guidance and decisions; a masterwork corpus provides inspiration and prose references. A worked example follows a requested object from its thematic role to climactic actions. Across four base models, MUSE improves WritingBench by 1.1 to 6.2 points over zero-shot generation; it is the only multi-stage system in our comparison to do so. It also raises LongStoryEval by more than ten points on three of the four models. ConStory-Bench consistency error density remains in the low single digits for all four models, below every reproduced story-system baseline on three of the four models. Ablations locate the largest quality contribution in structural design, voice-specific effects in the character path, and further gains in revision.

AI-assisted writing can flatten meaning in human storytelling, enabling the production of homogeneous outputs without the intentional effort and sense-making writing entails. To address this challenge, we present The House with a Million Windows (HWAMW), an LLM-based interactive fiction system designed to help users explore both the breadth and depth of potential meanings within their personal stories -- drawing on a psychological paradigm called the restorying intervention. In HWAMW, users play through a text-based narrative in which they tell a story, then encounter a set of LLM-generated "windows" reframing it according to different literary styles. Empirical evidence shows that HWAMW increases users' sense of narrative identity, while an expert review explores how this effect is achieved. Our findings suggest that HWAMW facilitates restorying and offers a valuable paradigm for AI-assisted writing, wherein LLMs do not tell our stories but rather help us see greater potential in the stories we tell.

World models, systems that generate what happens next given current environmental conditions, are increasingly being implemented with multi-modal generation in mind. However, generating multiple modalities simultaneously, such as visual simulations alongside physical state predictions in the form of text, introduces the risk of cross-modal inconsistency. Tested separately, both outputs may look convincing while still disagreeing: a model can calculate that a ball should rebound in one modality, then generate no rebound in another modality, to say nothing of diverging from real-world dynamics entirely. In this work we focus on two failures explicitly: \emph{Internal misalignment}, the disagreement between the world model's generated video and the same world model's prediction in a different modalities, and \emph{external misalignment} the disagreement between the world model's generation and an analytic physical environment. We derive common contracts of event, magnitude, timing, and construct a physics grounded pipeline to make comparisons measurable in both external and internal settings. We then ask whether progressively supplying the model's own contract (the A ladder for the internal setting) or a corrected physical contract (the B ladder for the external setting) closes the respective gaps. Across four mechanisms and 20 settings, we find that while language answers all 22 text probes correctly with respect to the true environment, the neutral video is often in disagreement, suggesting that the current unified backbones may not be capable of correct reasoning, internal consistency, and external physical fidelity all at once.

Cultural-heritage KGs such as the NFDI4Culture-KG contain millions of triples about artworks, music, inscriptions, historical events, and the people and places connected to them. For many users, however, discovering this knowledge can be difficult. While SPARQL can be learned, writing meaningful queries first requires an in-depth understanding of the graph's data model, an investment many domain researchers and practitioners are unwilling to make. Even with existing user interfaces, a starting point and some guidance are usually needed, because the data contained in the graph is highly specialized, heterogeneous, and constantly growing, making it challenging to know what it contains or which questions it can answer. In this paper, we present data stories as a way not only to lower this barrier, but also to turn exploration into data-quality assessment, and thus combine accessible querying with the discovery of issues that remain hidden in aggregate statistics. In this contribution, a data story is understood as a narrative document that integrates explanatory text and images with executable SPARQL queries and their visualized results. It is described how they are authored against the graph and how they serve several purposes: guiding users through an unfamiliar graph, creating reproducible narratives, and surfacing data-quality issues previously hidden in aggregate statistics. The authoring platform LODEON including its Sparnatural and AI-supported authoring assistants is introduced as a proof-of-concept. Within the authoring environment, every claim made about the data can be backed by an explicit query, making these narratives transparent and reproducible. This paper also reflects on lessons learned from hands-on seminars and workshops. Early experience suggests that such data stories make cultural-heritage knowledge graphs more accessible for both exploration and quality assessment.

Language models are trained to implement a helpful AI Assistant character (e.g., Claude). We explore how finetuning on synthetic stories affects this character. Does it change the Assistant's behavior in multi-turn conversations with users, a format quite different from the stories? And does the Assistant adopt the behaviors and preferences of human characters? We refer to this adoption as story imprinting. We finetune GPT-4.1 and Kimi-K2.6 on stories in which generally helpful human characters give subtly harmful advice after being insulted. The Assistant adopts the same conditional behavior while otherwise remaining helpful. This occurs even when fewer than 2% of stories depict the behavior. In a separate experiment, the Assistant adopts preferences that are only implicit in the narration. A human character's body language suggests they dislike working on spreadsheets, yet they never say so and continue giving good advice on spreadsheets. After finetuning, the Assistant becomes less likely to choose spreadsheet tasks. Next we ask which characters most influence the Assistant. We find the Assistant adopts behaviors more often from characters that resemble it (e.g., helpful rather than dismissive). We call this the affinity effect. The effect extends to other personas elicited with system prompts: unhelpful personas adopt behaviors from unhelpful characters. We also observe it in finetuned base models. We use the affinity effect to learn how models represent the Assistant. We find the Assistant adopts behaviors more from characters affiliated with elite universities (e.g., Yale) than non-elite ones. This implies the model's internal representation of the Assistant is more similar to humans from elite universities. Overall, the Assistant can be influenced by stories that depict only human characters (no AIs), which may conflict with the Persona Selection Model for the Assistant.

In disinformation datasets, narratives are often understood as recurring interpretive patterns that group texts under narrative labels. Recent work formalized narrative mining as inductively inferring narrative labels from corpora, but its evaluation stays tied to predefined taxonomies, a closed-world setting that cannot capture narratives absent from the reference labels. We introduce a three-tier evaluation framework for unsupervised narrative label generation: recovery (against a corpus's own taxonomy), mining (against external label sets), and discovery (without predefined labels). Applying it, we compare clustering-based and graph-community-based pipelines across seven disinformation datasets, with human validation of discovery on two. The two families are complementary under automated metrics, but in a corpus with two prominent topics, clustering can reduce one topic to 2% of generated labels while graph-based pipelines stay balanced. Discovery validation also reveals many singletons (narrative labels derived from single claims, 30-62% of graph outputs), which clustering cannot produce. Annotators confirm many as recognizable disinformation narratives, suggesting that in open-world discovery the repetition assumed by narrative mining may be recognized outside the corpus, not within it. We release human-validated narrative candidate labels for the Climate Obstruction and PolyNarrative datasets to support taxonomy development and dataset extension.

Social media platforms have become central to shaping political discourse, serving as arenas where narratives form and evolve, influencing public opinion. Identifying and analyzing these narratives, particularly when they compete across different political ideologies, is crucial for understanding the dynamics of modern political communication. This paper presents an unsupervised framework for identifying and characterizing competing narratives in political discourse on social media, focusing on German politicians' tweets. The framework employs a multi-stage pipeline that integrates natural language processing techniques such as topic modeling, event detection, and event linking. By forming data into coherent stories and uncovering the distinct perspectives of user communities, the system is able to detect the key competing narratives, highlighting the divergent framings and conflicts surrounding trending political topics. Two case studies on polarizing political issues demonstrate the efficacy of the methodology, showcasing its ability to uncover and analyze divergent viewpoints. The findings contribute to the broader understanding of how narratives propagate within the digital public sphere and offer insights for policymakers, social media platforms, and researchers interested in monitoring political discourse.

Modern science and engineering increasingly rely on time-varying data, yet the mathematical tools used to model temporal phenomena are often developed within separate disciplines, obscuring common principles and limiting the transfer of ideas across fields. This chapter presents the theory of narratives, an abstract framework for time-varying objects of any mathematical kind that supports both theoretical investigations and applications. To illustrate this perspective, the chapter develops three vignettes, each illustrating a different research direction. The first addresses a general concern: What information loss can occur when switching between different representations of temporal data? The second concerns structural and algorithmic approaches: How can we systematically decompose time-varying data into simple pieces and obtain invariants describing its structural complexity? The third is an application to control theory: How can we model multi-agent systems with switching communication topologies? More important than any individual vignette, the central message of this invitation is that a suitable abstract perspective can organize and guide research across remarkably diverse mathematical and scientific domains.

This paper presents a small-scale quantitative experiment that links syntactic structure to stylistic functions in narrative prose. Starting from a dependency-parsed corpus of 3,300 sentences, we derive sentence-level stylistic labels across five categories --- descriptive, introspective, causal, ideological, and neutral --- using a transparent rule-based procedure that inspects lemmas, universal part-of-speech tags, and syntactic relations. For each sentence we construct a compact representation of its syntactic profile as a sequence of linearised triples combining lemma, POS tag, and dependency relation. These patterns serve as input to standard machine-learning classifiers trained to predict sentence-level style. The best-performing model achieves a macro-F1 of 0.948 under 10-fold cross-validation. The experiment is implemented entirely in Python using open-source tools. Our goal is not to propose a fully fledged stylistic theory, but to offer a reproducible and extensible workflow for exploring how grammatical structure contributes to narrative interpretation.

People increasingly turn to large language models (LLMs) for everyday advice, making ethically charged interpersonal problems a practical moral-advisory context. Most prior work has studied this context through single-turn judgments or pressure-laden rebuttals, assumptions that poorly match how guidance is sought in real-world contexts. These assumptions leave unclear whether narration alone, without an explicit opposing position, can shift model judgments during multi-turn moral consultation. Yet real-world moral-conflict conversation often elicits one party's self-justifying account, which can unfold over multiple turns and create information asymmetry. We introduce \textbf{narrative captivity}, a failure mode in which a model treats an unopposed one-sided account as complete and aligns with the narrator's interpretation without seeking missing perspectives. To measure this phenomenon, we build a benchmark of $5{,}078$ interpersonal-conflict scenarios spanning six moral dimensions. Across 17 LLMs, narrative captivity is widespread: end-state judgments under multi-turn narration shift by 25 percentage points on average beyond the matched single-turn baseline. Stage-level analysis identifies preference optimization as a major contributor, while four inference-time strategies provide only partial mitigation. We hope our project fosters LLM advisors that preserve independent judgment in real-world consultation.

Audio Description (AD) provides spoken narration of visual events during dialogue gaps, making movies accessible to visually impaired audiences. The problem requires determining both what (which visual event) and when (position for inserting the AD) to narrate, to achieve the best user experience. Prior work has largely reduced the problem to video captioning of pre-segmented video clips, i.e., what is largely predefined and when is ignored entirely. We propose Cue2Narrate, a two-stage pipeline that jointly predicts what and when to narrate in longer untrimmed movie clips. A dual-head audio-visual localizer predicts two temporally distinct windows per AD utterance: a visual cue window and a spoken narration window. A LoRA-adapted VLM then generates concise ADs from the predicted visual evidence, trained with a Description Ranking Loss that ranks captions (negative samples) of the same frames lower than the GT AD. To benchmark this new problem statement, we introduce the LongLSMDC benchmark with up to 8-min movie clips (~6.5min on average). On LongLSMDC, Cue2Narrate outperforms video-only and audio-only localization baselines by 5--12 points in avg. mAP. Under both predicted- and GT-window evaluation, Cue2Narrate improves AD generation over the corresponding fine-tuned base VLM. These results establish the first benchmark for multi-segment AD generation on long-form clips. Data & Code: https://github.com/multimodal-ai-lab/Cue2Narrate

Effective humanitarian response depends on the rapid synthesis of heterogeneous, high-volume information sources - a task that routinely exceeds human analytical capacity in the critical early hours of a crisis. We present a pipeline that combines structured disaster records from EM-DAT with unstructured documents from ReliefWeb and the European Media Monitor (EMM) to produce source-grounded disaster storylines and causal knowledge graphs supporting situational awareness for responders and analysts. Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation, the pipeline extracts structured storylines - tabular event profiles covering 17 fields, from severity and key drivers to child-sensitive impact indicators - and constructs causal knowledge graphs where each node and edge is enriched with citation-grounded explanatory narratives, enabling full traceability back to primary sources. We evaluate the system on three diverse crisis use cases through a human evaluation involving 9 domain expert and 9 non-expert evaluators. Results confirm high retrieval precision, strong faithfulness of extracted causal relations, and a clear expert preference for citation-grounded components over ungrounded alternatives. The pipeline is designed to scale to the full EM-DAT catalogue, with the goal of publicly releasing a narrative-enriched version of the database.

Long documents often distribute important information across extensive narrative passages and multiple tables, making faithful summarization particularly challenging. Existing methods may generate individually supported quantitative facts and analytical statements yet associate them incorrectly, producing quantitatively plausible yet analytically unfaithful summaries. In this work, we propose LOOMSUM, a training-free framework that extracts source-grounded atomic evidence, explicitly links table-derived facts with supporting narrative analyses, and plans the discourse structure before generation. We also introduce Table-Grounded Faithfulness (TGF), a claim-level metric that separately evaluates Numeric Grounding, Analysis Support, and Relation Consistency. Experiments on the text--table summarization benchmarks FINDSum and USTT show that LOOMSUM improves analytical faithfulness while maintaining strong summarization quality. Human evaluation finds positive component-level associations with the corresponding human judgments. Our Relation Consistency metric further shows stronger agreement with human relation judgments than generic factuality metrics, indicating that explicit cross-modal linking helps reduce errors in which supported quantities are paired with incorrect narrative interpretations. Together, these findings show that faithful long text--table summarization requires not only grounding individual facts, but also preserving the relations between them.

Automatic academic paper-to-slide generation is inherently iterative, because creating an effective presentation requires repeated cycles of generation, critique, and revision. Recent multi-agent systems partially acknowledge this through internal critique-and-revise loops, while conversational approaches allow users to refine generated slide decks through dialog. However, these refinement processes either remain largely closed to the user or introduce feedback only after a complete deck has been produced, limiting the user's ability to participate in the iterative refinement of narrative flow, content allocation, and presentation emphasis. To address this gap, we introduce ConvDeck, a multi-agent pipeline for conversational paper-to-slide generation that distributes interaction across the pipeline through stage-specific loops, allowing users to iteratively refine both the presentation outline and the final slide deck at the stages where each kind of decision is made. These loops are driven by a refinement mechanism in which agents can think, speak, and act, enabling them to either directly apply edits or respond conversationally to clarify user feedback and discuss revision options. Our evaluation shows that stage-specific conversational feedback improves user-goal satisfaction while preserving narrative coherence, content quality, and visual presentation.

Surgical phase recognition is key to context-aware computer-assisted feedback in vitreoretinal procedures, yet the scarcity of synchronized multimodal intraoperative data, particularly microscope views and intraoperative OCT, limits approaches that aim to replicate the multimodal integration surgeons perform naturally. Surgical narration, by contrast, is abundantly available online and offers rich semantic supervision. Prior work has mainly explored pairwise contrastive learning (e.g., intraoperative OCT-microscope or microscope-narration), leaving the joint modeling of all three modalities largely unexplored. We introduce a framework that uses microscope views as a shared anchor to bridge surgical narrations and intraoperative OCT (iOCT) without requiring a fully synchronized tri-modal dataset, leveraging real microscope-narration videos and a synthetic dataset of synchronized microscope video and tool-aligned iOCT pairs. Contrastive alignment transfers structural priors from the synthetic domain to real videos lacking iOCT, and a dual-head MS-TCN++ integrates the resulting embeddings for joint macro- and micro-phase prediction. Evaluated on real vitreoretinal surgeries, our framework improves macro-phase recognition over a zero-shot baseline (mean F1 0.38 to 0.53) and provides an exploratory route to estimating fine-grained instrument-tissue measurements that are not directly observable in real microscope video alone; these micro-phase estimates are validated quantitatively on synthetic data and shown only qualitatively on real surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first work to unify microscope view, iOCT B-scans, and surgical narrations in a shared latent space for surgical phase recognition.

Manga visual question answering requires models to answer questions over panel-based visual narratives, where relevant evidence is distributed across ordered panels, embedded text, recurring characters, and implicit event transitions. This structure makes passive page encoding insufficient, as the model must identify which panels to inspect, what clues to retain, and when the accumulated evidence is sufficient for answering. We propose ManGo (Manga Active Narrative Grounding Optimization), an unsupervised framework for active manga visual question answering. ManGo introduces Active Narrative Sketching (ANS), which iteratively selects panels, extracts concise grounded clues, and decides when to stop, forming a compact question-directed evidence sketch before answer generation. To optimize this behavior without human-annotated answers or rationale paths, ManGo samples multiple ANS rollouts and applies group-relative training with two rewards: answer preference from listwise self-ranking and path consistency from stable ordered panel trajectories. The combined reward is optimized with group-relative policy training, encouraging the model to improve both final answers and the panel-level evidence paths that support them. Experiments on standard manga understanding benchmarks show that ManGo achieves state-of-the-art performance across different settings.

Large language models (LLMs) often produce fluent but weakly grounded conclusions when reasoning over non-interactive, long-form narratives. A central failure mode is that unsupported intermediate hypotheses can enter the reasoning trajectory and contaminate subsequent inference, especially when evidence is scattered across distant parts of the story. To address this problem, we propose EVAR, an evidence-validated hypothesis admission framework for budget-aware narrative reasoning. EVAR first compiles the narrative into an immutable evidence store of source-linked atomic claims and assigns an instance-specific inference budget from unresolved gaps and uncertainty signals. During refinement, EVAR directly proposes candidate hypotheses for unresolved gaps, constructs hypothesis-conditioned validation challenges, and verifies each candidate against the locked store before admission: supported hypotheses enter the answer-supporting state, unverifiable ones are quarantined, and contradictory ones are discarded. A sufficiency-based stopping mechanism further avoids unnecessary refinement. Experiments on NarraCrime and multiple public reasoning benchmarks show that EVAR improves both task performance and evidence faithfulness while maintaining controllable inference cost.

Long-form video understanding encompasses tasks that go beyond retrieving isolated events, including tracking an evolving narrative and interpreting social meaning that may remain implicit. However, existing benchmarks rarely evaluate these capabilities jointly, particularly in high-context, non-English media. To address this gap, we introduce NARU, a benchmark designed to evaluate Narrative evolution and Reasoning on cultural Understanding in Japanese long-form video. NARU consists of 1,481 questions grounded in 155 videos totaling 146.8 hours, spanning four narrative and five cultural dimensions. To construct the benchmark at this scale, we propose a hierarchical memory-based annotation pipeline that transforms raw video into structured event, narrative, and cultural annotations, then generates questions via task-oriented synthesis and iterative shortcut removal. The construction process includes two native-speaker verification stages involving 68 annotators. Evaluations across eight model configurations reveal substantial limitations in both long-range narrative integration and culturally grounded reasoning. By exposing these persistent gaps, NARU offers a systematic testing ground for developing MLLMs capable of reliably interpreting long-form, high-context video.

Feature-attribution methods such as SHAP provide useful evidence about individual model predictions, but their numerical outputs are rarely sufficient for audiences with different expertise, goals, and risks of misinterpretation. In medical AI, the same local explanation must reach patients, clinicians, and data scientists through markedly different forms of communication, and naive verbalization through large language models (LLMs) is prone to weak grounding, conflation of attribution with causal language, and outputs that are persuasive without being faithful to the underlying model evidence. We introduce XstrAI, an audience-aware multi-agent framework that treats local explanations as fixed evidence and structures how it is communicated to each target reader. Each prediction case is encoded as an immutable structured representation, shared identically across audiences so the underlying evidence remains fixed. Generation is factored into three specialized LLM agents responsible for audience-aware planning, linguistic realization, and validation for grounding, attribution consistency, communicative risk, and audience appropriateness, with a bounded revision loop triggered on detected inconsistencies. We evaluate XstrAI on diabetes and stroke risk prediction against 11 baselines, ranging from direct verbalization to a re-implementation of a state-of-the-art narrator. The evaluation combines an intra-narrative regime measuring fidelity to SHAP evidence with an extra-narrative regime assessing audience appropriateness through reference corpora, multi-family LLM judges, and a survey with target readers. In both evaluations, XstrAI's narratives are consistently assigned to their intended audience by independent judges, and preferred over all baselines on Clinician and Patient audiences, with competitive performance on Data Scientist, where audience-conditioned single-prompt baselines lead.

We introduce narrative keyframing, an interaction technique for AI-assisted creative writing that lets writers specify different types of narrative constraints at selected moments in a story, then use AI to generate intervening prose. Inspired by the use of keyframing in animation, narrative keyframing offers a flexible way to connect story planning with adaptive control over generated text. We explore three types of keyframes: plot keyframes define significant events in a story, character keyframes represent how individual characters change over the narrative, and perspective keyframes capture how individual characters experience different events through first-person narratives. Plot and character keyframes offer a flexible way to adapt the type of high-level conditioning explored in previous AI writing tools to more customizable, iterative, and fine-scale control, while perspective keyframes add a new way to control characterization and focalization by using first-person narratives as an intermediary. Through a user study, we show that narrative keyframing supports a more controllable, transparent, and engaging way to use generative AI in creative writing.

Narrating the visual component of movies is known as audio description. It is a narrative technique designed to enable blind and visually impaired individuals to follow the story. However, it is far more constrained than most narratives: the descriptions not only need to convey the story in the movie, but they must also fit into gaps between dialogue and they need to conform to guidelines that exist in each region. In this work, we compare audio description created in the United Kingdom against audio description created in the United States. We use guidelines written for these two regions, alongside the impressions from a practitioner in the field, to motivate specific hypotheses about the differences. We test these hypotheses against our pre-existing corpus, which provides both human-authored American and British audio description for each of 206 movies. Results provide quantitative evidence to uphold all tested hypotheses, including differences in lexicon, the use of the progressive aspect, the use of passive constructions, the use of subjective adjectives and modifiers, when characters are named, how scenes are cued, and degree of overlap with movie dialogue and music. Our work offers a quantitative lens into the narrative technique of audio description.

Great fiction earns its verisimilitude through precise details, from how a longsword is gripped to pierce armor gaps to why a bleeding corpse cannot yet smell of decay, weaving domain expertise into the fabric of invented worlds. Current AI writing tools offer limited support for discovering and integrating unfamiliar domain knowledge into narrative. They require explicit queries that authors cannot formulate, generate finished prose that risks homogenizing voice, or assist only within the boundaries of what authors already know. We argue that AI should reveal latent knowledge gaps to writers while preserving their agency to transform discovered knowledge into authentic prose. Grounded in formative interviews with 9 fiction writers, we present VeriForge, a mixed-initiative writing system that divides cognitive labor so that the system assumes initiative over domain discovery while the author retains full initiative over narrative synthesis. VeriForge realizes this through three complementary mechanisms. Proactive inline highlighting flags potential knowledge gaps as authors draft. Dual-stream querying pairs conversational responses with source-anchored Knowledge Cards for direct fact extraction. A spatial Knowledge Canvas allows authors to organize and connect discovered knowledge across their writing. These mechanisms are powered by a graph-based retrieval-augmented generation pipeline grounded in domain-specific source materials. A within-subjects user study (N=12) provides preliminary evidence that this paradigm helps authors recognize previously overlooked knowledge gaps, supports creative exploration, and is perceived by expert raters to produce passages with stronger domain grounding in a controlled cold-start writing task.

Audio dramas weave dialogue, sound effects, and music into immersive stories. Creators often adapt books into audio dramas, but this process remains labor-intensive, requiring them to interpret source material, author scripts, generate audio assets, and assemble them on a timeline. Because story elements like characters and scenes manifest across many interdependent assets, a single change can ripple into manual updates across the entire project. We present Dramarrator, an audio drama authoring tool built around object-based audio editing, where these story elements are represented as editable objects. Dramarrator extracts these objects from a book, generates linked audio assets (speech, sound effects, and music), and composes a multi-track audio drama. Edits to any object (e.g., a character's voice) automatically propagate to all dependent assets. In a user study with professionals (N=8), Dramarrator significantly lowered task load when creating audio dramas. A listener study (N=300) shows that creator-refined output from Dramarrator approaches the quality of productions made with existing professional tools, and an exploratory study (N=3) suggests object-based editing lowers entry barriers and generalizes beyond audio dramas.

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) is revolutionizing AI for Games by enabling open-ended and fluid interactive storytelling. However, existing research has largely overlooked the critical challenge of maintaining long-horizon logical consistency and narrative integrity against unconstrained user interventions. To address this, we formulate this challenge as Narrative Commitment Preservation (NCP), and take interactive narrative as our testbed. We introduce NCP-Bench, a benchmark of 100 narrative environments derived from movie synopses. Each environment includes a structured narrative specification (trajectory, commitments, and initial facts) that we can automatically check throughout the interaction between the player agent and the narrator agent. Experiments across state-of-the-art LLMs reveal a substantial long-horizon consistency gap: high linguistic quality does not guarantee commitment preservation; even strong models frequently generate logically conflicting content under adversarial interventions, with the best-performing model (GPT-5.2) achieving only 42% survival rate after 20 turns and fact conflict rates ranging from 40% to 68% across models, and only isolated runs satisfying all achievement commitments within the 100-turn limit.

Credit scoring increasingly relies on models whose decision logic cannot be read off their parameters, in tension with supervisory expectations that adverse decisions be explainable. A common proposal closes that gap with a language model: compute feature attributions, hand them to an LLM, and let it write the rationale. We build such a system end to end and test whether the second half of the promise holds. The predictive component is a multi-scale stacking ensemble fusing four differently regularised gradient-boosting learners with a residual network through a neural meta-learner trained on out-of-fold predictions. On a public 32,581-application credit dataset it reaches test ROC-AUC 0.9539 (95% CI [0.9462, 0.9616]) and PR-AUC 0.9137, beating the best single model by Delta-AUC = 0.0143 (p = 0.016 under a conservative independence assumption). Our central finding is asymmetric. The ranking gain is real but operationally small: at the F1-optimal threshold the ensemble avoids only six additional missed defaults out of 1,422 against a tuned random forest, cutting cost-weighted loss by under 2%. The narrative layer fails in a way prompt engineering alone does not fix. In an audited case the model named three factors as risk-increasing that the supplied attributions scored as risk-reducing, omitted the dominant driver, and introduced a feature never given to it. We trace this to properties we measure rather than assume: SHAP and LIME agree on which features matter (overlap@10 = 0.80) but not on their order (tau = 0.43, p = 0.18), and the attribution sign for the model's most sensitive input is near a coin flip across applicants (modal-sign share 0.53). Calibration (ECS = 0.117) and perturbation stability (DPD = 0.078) both fall short of our own thresholds. Constrained prompting is necessary but not sufficient: grounding must be verified after generation, not assumed.

While post-training improves the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), it generally lowers their output diversity and creativity, negatively impacting tasks that explicitly require creativity (e.g., story generation) as well as those that require it implicitly, e.g., reinforcement learning (RL). We instead propose CreativeInstruct, a scalable instruction-tuning method that teaches LLMs to balance creative, base-model-like generations with the quality of post-trained models, by learning to inject special [StartCreativity] spans that bias generation toward creativity. Furthermore, we introduce a structural diversity metric based on graph edit distance, which captures narrative level variation missed by purely lexical and semantic metrics. On narrative generation, CreativeInstruct matches or exceeds the diversity of both multi-model baselines and distilled variants of their outputs, without sacrificing quality or requiring multiple models at inference time. These results are mirrored in our human evaluation, where we find that annotators rate CreativeInstruct generations as more creative than the post-trained LLMs' generations in 70.3% of cases. We also show the benefits of creative models as a substrate for RL: GRPO applied to a CreativeInstruct checkpoint improves by ~4% on AMC and ~5% points on MATH over the same training applied to the post-trained checkpoint.

Long-horizon role-playing demands that characters remain recognizable as they evolve with the narrative. Yet existing work falls short on two fronts: representations are typically static profiles that cannot be updated locally without destabilizing unchanged traits, and benchmarks mainly test persona preservation and memory recall rather than whether a model speaks from a character's currently evolved state. We address both. PHASE-Tree is a multi-timescale character-state tree with an immutable identity root and mutable persona, session, and moment layers, making each mutable field an addressable target for localized within- and cross-episode updates. It conditions generation through explicit textual provision or implicit parametric adaptation. To measure evolved-state generation, we introduce LongEvoRoleBench, which pairs four long-dialogue corpora for cross-episode evolution with four short-dialogue corpora as within-scene state-tracking checks, under a unified next-utterance protocol. On the long-dialogue core, textual PHASE-Tree ranks first in 11 of 12 dataset-metric cells against internal variants and all 12 cells against external textual baselines, improving character-level, semantic, and embedding scores by 19.7%, 12.4%, and 15.1% respectively. In a blinded 200-response study, human ratings correlate with the GPT-4.1 judge (Pearson r= 0.65); on descriptive n= 10 PT and NR prompt subsets, the Overall difference is +0.20. The long-dialogue Sem advantage persists across LLM judges and generation backbones.

Text-to-music (TTM) generation systems allow users to create music through natural language prompts, yet it is unclear whether the descriptive language used to prompt aligns with descriptive language used to summarize or describe heard music. We pair 200 real-world Udio prompts with their generated audio and free-form descriptions collected from English- (n = 70) and Korean-speaking (n = 78) listeners, and contribute a human-derived taxonomy of musical prompting vocabulary grounded in real user data. Using this framework, alongside word- and vector-level analyses, we find a consistent structural asymmetry: prompts are dominated by Genre and Story/Narrative language. Genre terms propagate most reliably from prompt to perception, while narrative-heavy prompts are the strongest predictor of semantic misalignment. A preliminary cross-cultural comparison further suggests that description profiles vary across listener populations along narrative, functional, and affective dimensions, raising questions about whether current TTM systems, trained on aggregated English-centric corpora, can accommodate the full diversity of how people naturally express musical ideas.

Social media videos often communicate meanings that go beyond their visible actions, captions, or speech. A mundane clip may become humorous, ironic, or satire only through the interaction of multimodal cues and cultural context, making such content a difficult test case for video-language models. In this paper, we introduce \textit{DrivelHub+}, a benchmark for evaluating whether models can infer the implicit, non-linear, and rhetorically layered meanings of social media videos that appear nonsensical on the surface but convey deliberate pragmatic meanings. DrivelHub+ consists of 1,000 videos collected from social media, each annotated with a human-written implicit narrative explanation. Unlike conventional video understanding tasks focused on recognition or description, we present a benchmark that targets contextual multimodal reasoning. We evaluate current video-language models from two perspectives: explanation, where models must explain the pragmatic comprehension of a video in natural language; and representation, where we adapt reasoning-as-retrieval to test whether model representations align videos with their corresponding implicit narratives in both video-to-text and text-to-video retrieval. Our benchmark provides a diagnostic setting for measuring the gap between multimodal perception and pragmatic comprehension, asking whether current models can move beyond describing what is shown to inferring what is meant.

Video large language models (Video-LLMs) have made strong progress in open-ended video understanding. However, their visual interfaces remain token-intensive and provide limited explicit structure for linking recurring object evidence across time. We introduce SlotNarrative, a slot-based interface that organizes a video into persistent object narratives represented by compact object-state tokens. Rather than compressing frame-wise features before establishing temporal correspondence, SlotNarrative first groups visual features into object-like slots and then associates recurring observations with clip-level object entries through a lightweight, parameter-free memory that integrates multiple complementary matching cues. Each retained entry is serialized into two token types: an identity token that summarizes persistent object appearance and a set of state tokens that encode segment-level appearance, geometry, visibility, and trajectory information. This design yields an interface of only 144 allocated visual-token positions for a frozen Video-LLM, independent of the number of sampled frames. Across multiple datasets, SlotNarrative achieves a favorable trade-off between accuracy and visual-token count compared with prior compact Video-LLM interfaces. Experimental results establish persistent object narratives as a compact, structured, and temporally organized visual interface for Video-LLMs. Our code will be made publicly available.

Operational hazard analysis of aviation system operations must consider interactions among weather, ATC actions, airspace constraints, aircraft operations, and human factors - distinct from the functional hazard assessment applied at the aircraft-system level. We present an AI-assisted approach that generates candidate hazard scenarios from NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS). Given a target adverse outcome, it produces a structured hypothesis as categorical factors and a narrative scenario describing an operational event sequence consistent with the structure. Each scenario includes by a plausibility score from historical co-occurrence evidence and traceability to the most similar held-out ASRS reports. We then propose a hybrid variant, conditioning narrative generation on a structured hypothesis produced via evolutionary abduction, improving correctness and reducing variability. We evaluate multiple large language models, zero-shot versus few-shot prompting, and optional fine-tuning, measuring how prompting and model choice affect the validity and realism of the generated structures and narratives.

Surgical procedures unfold as structured and recurring clinical events, whose real-time understanding via intraoperative surgical videos is critical for intraoperative decision-making and support. However, existing video understanding methods force a trade-off: autoregressive video-language models support comprehensive reasoning but are not practical for time-sensitive clinical applications, whereas contrastive models offer low latency but struggle with complex scene understanding. Recently, generative retrieval has been explored for general-domain video understanding, but transferring it to surgery is not trivial because near-identical visual appearances may indicate semantically distinct events, and the terminology involved is highly surgery-specific. To this end, we propose SurgNarrator, a new generative retrieval framework tailored for surgical video understanding. We construct a well-curated surgery-centric vocabulary from surgical captions to define a clinically meaningful retrieval space. We then adapt the pre-trained Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B to learn discriminative clinical representations with a temporally-aware contrastive objective. During inference, a hierarchical, procedure-aware retrieval strategy narrows the search space to the relevant procedure type, delivering fast and effective responses. Our method is comprehensively evaluated on twelve benchmarks in a zero-shot setting and achieves consistent performance gains over state-of-the-art baselines, while reducing output-stage latency by more than two orders of magnitude compared with the generative baseline.

Enterprise forecasting increasingly relies on autonomous agents that interpret documents, search for data, generate code, and revise models. While this autonomy helps build adaptive forecasting pipelines, it also makes it difficult for practitioners to inspect why a forecast changed, which evidence supported the change, and how data and modeling choices were revised. We present TraceMAS, an interactive demo system for traceable multi-agent forecasting. TraceMAS organizes agent outputs around two causal-loop representations: an Ideal Causal Loop Diagram (Ideal CLD), which captures key factors and their causal relations extracted from domain documents, and a Data-Grounded Causal Loop Diagram (Data-Grounded CLD), which links those factors to internal variables, external data, or documented proxies. The Data-Grounded CLD guides feature construction and model design while preserving the connection between textual evidence, data choices, and model revisions. We demonstrate TraceMAS on crude oil price forecasting. The demo interface allows users to compare forecasting iterations, inspect agent-level revisions, explore causal maps, review feature-data mappings and model architecture, and connect scenario forecasts to market narratives. This demonstration shows how autonomous forecasting agents can retain flexibility while making the evidence-to-forecast process inspectable.

Designing narrative-grounded interactive experiences remains labor-intensive because interactive content must align with the underlying world implied by the narrative. Existing approaches formulate problems such as narrative planning, scene generation, and gameplay generation, each constructing computational representations tailored to specific downstream tasks rather than explicitly reconstructing and maintaining the persistent world that grounds them. We investigate reconstructing explicit persistent worlds from narrative descriptions as the central computational objective for narrative-grounded interactive realization. Rather than treating the world as an implicit by-product of downstream generation, our approach reconstructs and maintains persistent entities, locations, semantic relationships, and evolving world states while inferring only the contextual information required to support coherent interactive experiences. To investigate this perspective, we develop a reference prototype that reconstructs structured persistent world representations from narrative descriptions and subsequently instantiates playable tile-based environments. Through three representative case studies spanning a procedural scenario, an original fantasy narrative, and an adapted public-domain story, we demonstrate the feasibility of reconstructing persistent worlds and show how a shared world representation supports coherent gameplay while remaining grounded in the source narrative. By explicitly reconstructing persistent worlds prior to interactive realization, this work bridges computational narrative understanding and interactive content generation, providing a semantic foundation for AI-assisted game authoring, mixed-initiative design, educational simulations, and narrative-grounded interactive experiences.

Social dynamics encode the process in which individual network and discourse interactions aggregate into collective influence, narrative dominance and coordinate behavior. This paper uses the the GhostField architecture, a hybrid LLM-Enabled Agent Based Network-Dynamic (LAND) model as a social simulation framework to build the AuraSight scenario. In the AuraSight scenario, 314,244 heterogeneous cyber social agents and human actors exchange 529,327 messages over 30 days surrounding a fictional international song-writing contest. We methodologically examine emergent social dynamics across four analytical layers: ego-network topology, semantic network evolution, coordination dynamics and influence dynamics. Our results show how generated social simulations do also produce social dynamics, and how the dynamics of coordination and influence emerge not from individual agents but from the recursive interaction between network topology and narrative exchange.

Migrants traversing geographically distinct routes such as the Trans-Saharan and Balkan corridors often recount strikingly parallel lived experiences: police violence, smuggler exploitation, dangerous crossings, and family separation. We introduce the task of experiential intertextuality detection: automatically identifying shared experiential echoes across migration narratives without requiring annotated training data. From 108 French migration narratives spanning both corridors, we automatically generate sentence pairs and score them using annotation-free methods: lexical baselines, sentence embeddings, POS-based structural features, a migration-specific theme lexicon, context-aware narrative features, and zero-shot LLM scoring with Qwen2.5-7B and Mistral-7B under three prompting strategies. We validate all methods against 816 expert-annotated intertextuality judgments (inter-annotator Krippendorff's $α= 0.27$). Our results reveal that all surface, structural, and embedding methods correlate only weakly with expert judgments ($r \leq 0.30$); Qwen2.5-7B zero-shot achieves the best single-method correlation ($r = 0.38$); few-shot examples degrade Qwen but dramatically improve Mistral; narrative position significantly predicts intertextuality, with departure-phase pairs showing the highest experiential echoes; and a supervised hybrid combining all 31 features achieves $r = 0.45$, a 21% improvement over the best individual method.

Large language models used for clinical diagnostic reasoning are sensitive to sociolinguistic register, not just clinical content. We term this failure mode Narrative Anchoring: identical clinical facts expressed in different registers cause diagnostic outputs to diverge. Unlike prior demographic-bias work, which manipulates explicit identity tokens such as race or income, our benchmark isolates register as the sole channel of variation, with no demographic marker present in any form. We construct a dataset of 1,000 USMLE clinical vignettes, each rewritten into three sociolinguistically distinct personas under an independently audited fact-preservation guarantee, verified by a separate model that never sees the generation prompt. Across seven language models spanning three architecture families and scales, Narrative Anchoring is statistically significant under direct prompting in every model tested, with a Narrative Anchoring Gap of 0.064 to 0.151. Chain-of-thought reasoning and explicit debiasing instructions reduce the bias only partially, and their apparent gains are frequently confounded by accuracy collapse. We introduce NarrativeShield, a three-agent pipeline that structurally extracts and verifies clinical facts before diagnostic reasoning begins, reducing the Narrative Anchoring Gap to near-zero ($-0.004$ to $0.037$) and achieving the lowest rate of severely unstable decisions (DSS $<$ 0.8) of any method across all models, at a modest and mechanistically expected accuracy cost for most models. A stress test using a non-instruction-tuned base model shows that executing a debiasing intervention at all is gated by zero-shot instruction-following ability, not prompt content alone. We release our dataset, human-validated for fact preservation, as a standalone resource for studying register-based clinical bias.

Video editing is fundamentally message-driven: even from the same source footage, the selected shots change depending on the narrative the editor wishes to convey. Benchmarks for a closely related task, video summarization, reduce editorial intent to a single, message-agnostic notion of saliency and thus do not account for this diversity. For evaluating message-driven video editing, we present \textbf{MEDit-Bench}, a dataset and benchmark, which pairs long-form videos with multiple editing messages and multiple professionally produced edits per message, demonstrating that different messages yield substantially different edits from the same source. We define an automatic evaluation protocol based on temporal alignment metrics, and find that an LLM-as-a-judge preference, a natural proxy for narrative quality, is unreliable for this task due to severe position bias. We additionally annotate each message with ambiguity and contextfulness scores, and show that both dimensions negatively correlate with model performance, establishing message difficulty as a meaningful stratification factor. Experiments with state-of-the-art MLLMs and reinforcement fine-tuned baselines show that while strong models approach human temporal alignment at lenient thresholds, all models fall behind humans at stricter criteria. A human perceptual study further confirms a large quality gap, with professional human edits remaining consistently preferred over model outputs.

Background. Pediatric musculoskeletal trauma represents up to 18% of pediatric ED visits, yet diagnosis still depends on ionizing radiography. Cumulative low-dose radiation in early life raises lifetime leukemia and brain malignancy risk, motivating radiation-free triage alternatives. Objective. To synthesize evidence for a hybrid framework coupling broad-spectrum infrared (IR) imaging with deep-learning cross-modal translation to generate clinically interpretable synthetic-radiograph reconstructions from non-ionizing data. Approach. We review five IR spectral windows spanning 650 nm to 1 mm - NIR-I, NIR-II, SWIR, MIR/LWIR, and THz - and how dual-geometry (transmission/reflection) acquisition exploits wavelength-specific tissue depth and biochemical sensitivity. We summarize image-to-image translation networks (Pix2Pix, CycleGAN, Swin-Unet) and feature-matching algorithms (SuperPoint, SuperGlue, ALIKED, LightGlue) used to align and fuse IR data into radiograph-equivalent reconstructions. Implications. Pediatric anatomy - smaller cross-sections, thinner cortical bone - favors IR penetration, enabling compact, portable, non-ionizing triage hardware. Feasibility is grounded in fNIRS and transcranial photobiomodulation evidence: near-infrared light passes through skin, skull, and cortex with sufficient signal for hemodynamic monitoring - a longer, more attenuating path than through a pediatric forearm or distal leg. Key barriers: paired IR/X-ray dataset construction, AI-as-medical-device regulatory pathways, generalization across body habitus and skin pigmentation, and acquisition-protocol standardization. Conclusions. Integrated multi-spectral IR+AI imaging is a promising radiation-free complement to pediatric skeletal radiography. Progress requires multi-center paired datasets, externally validated models, and IR source safety qualification under IEC 60825-1.

Modern multi-agent knowledge systems increasingly accumulate knowledge through chains of autonomous transformations rather than direct retrieval. Existing provenance work records what happened - execution traces, tool calls, evidence links - and source-reliability estimation is long established (truth discovery, reputation systems). What is missing is an operational framework that attaches graded, per-domain transmitter reliability to claim-level transmission chains, with completeness semantics, transformation-typed aggregation, decoupled content criticism, and serve/review/quarantine routing. Classical Islamic hadith science confronted a structurally similar problem: deciding whether knowledge transmitted through chains of human narrators should be accepted. Over centuries it developed a rigorous methodology - isnad (a complete transmission chain attached to every claim), rijal (systematic grading of each narrator's integrity and precision), weakest-link chain evaluation, corroboration through independent chains, and matn criticism (content evaluated independently of chain quality). This paper transfers that methodology to AI system design. We contribute a formal mapping from hadith-science concepts to multi-agent pipelines, a relational schema implementing claim chains and a graded narrator registry, a decision matrix combining chain grade with content criticism, and an evaluation on 20,000 claims from real physics textbooks. The evaluation validates weakest-link quarantine and independent-chain corroboration; reports a partial failure of the grade-recovery loop, which missed the highest-fault narrator; and reports two analyses as inconclusive, including a matched-coverage comparison the framework could not reach with the reference content critic. The paper is explicit throughout about which claims the evidence does and does not yet support.

Electronic Theater Programs (ETPs) serve as critical promotional media in the performing arts, comprising a multi-page collection of heterogeneous visual assets such as theatrical posters, performance details, and character portraits. However, existing text-to-image paradigms struggle with such complex design tasks due to their inability to comprehend long-context narratives and maintain visual consistency across multiple distinct pages. To address this, we introduce ETPDesigner, a collaborative Multi-Agent framework that directly synthesizes high-quality ETPs from raw dramatic scripts. Emulating a professional design pipeline, our framework orchestrates specialized agents for semantic script analysis, core poster synthesis, functional background generation, and the stratified composition of character assets. Central to ETPDesigner is a global style anchor mechanism that extracts visual priors from the core poster to enforce strict aesthetic uniformity across all generated components. Furthermore, we elevate the ETP from a static publication to an immersive interactive companion. By integrating portrait animation, customized speech synthesis, and persona-grounded Large Language Models (LLMs), our system enables users to engage in real-time, voice-enabled conversations with the generated virtual characters. To rigorously benchmark this task, we construct ETP-Pro, a domain-specific benchmark of professional theater posters and high-quality character portraits. Extensive evaluations demonstrate our method's superiority in producing semantically faithful, aesthetically consistent, and highly interactive program sets.

Translating novels into films poses a grand challenge for generative artificial intelligence, requiring conversion of abstract literary prose into long-form, multi-scene visual narratives. While current video generation models excel at short, single-scene clips within narrow temporal and spatial contexts, novel-to-film generation operates in a more complex regime, demanding long-duration content across diverse scenes with dynamically evolving entity states. To address this, we formalize novel-to-film generation as dynamic cinematic world modeling, decomposed into two phases: construction, which grounds abstract, underspecified literary narratives into concrete, stateful, and persistent world entities; and evolution, which governs how these entities dynamically update under plot progression to maintain causal consistency across scenes. We propose FilmWorld, an end-to-end agentic system where two groups of specialized agents collaborate to instantiate these phases. Construction-side agents perform narrative structured translation, world entity state modeling with visual anchoring, and state-driven shot planning, progressively projecting literary language into a cinematic blueprint. Evolution-side agents perform state-anchored visual generation, cross-shot dynamic state propagation, and closed-loop state verification to maintain causal consistency and visual coherence. To address the evaluation gap in long-form generation, we introduce FilmEval, a systematic evaluation framework that couples a difficulty-graded benchmark of 15 representative novels with an automated protocol of nine objective metrics spanning three dimensions: cinematic presentation, film consistency, and novel fidelity. Experiments demonstrate that FilmWorld consistently outperforms state-of-the-art video generation agent systems, with particularly pronounced improvements in narrative fidelity and cross-scene consistency.

Persona prompting is widely used to steer LLM agent behavior, yet the narrative framing of a task can matter more than the assigned persona. We isolate this effect through structural isomorphism, constructing three text-based investigation games that share the same action space, stage progression, and resource constraints while varying only task narrative: disease investigation, IT troubleshooting, and murder mystery. Across 1,890 sessions spanning 3 models and 10 personas, we identify narrative priors: systematic action tendencies activated by a task's story framing, independent of its decision structure. Narrative priors explain 5-31x more behavioral variance than persona, are consistent across model architectures, and in two of three domains are negatively associated with task success. Persona effects that do transfer across narratives arise from behavioral anchors, persona descriptions whose language maps directly onto shared actions. Causal interventions confirm this: removing anchor words from a high-transfer persona reduces cross-narrative consistency by 95%. Our framework also generalizes to a held-out fourth narrative and yields a persona-selection method that improves cross-narrative transfer. These results suggest that LLM behavior that survives narrative changes should be grounded in concrete actions rather than abstract descriptions.

Money mule accounts are critical facilitators of financial fraud, yet detecting them at scale remains challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of transactional and behavioural data. We present an end-to-end pipeline for customer-level mule detection comprising three stages: (1) a LightGBM classifier trained on 280 engineered features spanning transaction patterns, account demographics, network topology, and temporal behaviour; (2) a TreeSHAP attribution layer that decomposes each prediction into feature contributions; and (3) a large language model (LLM) module that converts SHAP attributions into analyst-facing natural-language narratives. We evaluate across three open-weight LLM families and assess explanation quality through analyst feedback. In a live production deployment, the system achieves a yield rate of 89%, up from 61% under the incumbent rule-based system, with monthly alert volume expanding from 211 to 302, reflecting broader true-positive coverage rather than increased noise. This corresponds to a 60% incremental adverse detection beyond existing review workflows, substantially outperforming the rule-based approach. Qualitative feedback from analysts indicates that LLM-generated narratives reduce cognitive load during alert triage. We further discuss implications of deploying LLM-augmented explainability in regulated financial environments.

Generation of clear and accessible public health narratives is critical for communicating complex epidemiological projections to policymakers and the general public at large. Such narratives require more than simply reporting numbers: projections must be contextualized and quantitatively grounded across multiple dimensions. Further, projections are often derived from large ensemble datasets which combine intervention assumptions, geographic and demographic strata, outcomes, time horizons, and uncertainty quantiles. However, directly using large language models (LLMs) to summarize and contextualize such data often leads to inconsistencies, omissions, and fragile behavior. We introduce an agentic framework (EpiNarrate) for public health report generation that separates structured numerical reasoning from natural-language generation. The framework first extracts scenario axes and organizes them into a partial-order schema, enabling systematic traversal of the underlying multidimensional space. It then constructs an augmented dataset and derives valid quantitative statements through a comparison grammar that enforces semantic and arithmetic consistency. To balance coverage and non-redundancy, we introduce an interestingness-driven selection mechanism based on maximum-entropy principles. Experiments on the COVID-19 Scenario Modeling Hub demonstrate that our model produces narratives with improved factual grounding and broader coverage of salient epidemiological patterns, while preserving the style of expert-written reports.

Automated optimisation is increasingly adopted in industrial processes, yet a trust gap persists between engineers who design these algorithms and operators who must act on their recommendations. Explainable AI methods like SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) have transformed interpretability for machine learning predictions; optimisation outputs could benefit from similar techniques. We present an approach that integrates Implicit Function Theorem (IFT) based sensitivity analysis with SHAP attribution and narrative generation via Large Language Models (LLM), producing explanations tailored for operators. Our approach leverages IFT to compute exact parameter sensitivities $\partial p^*/\partial x$ from the optimality conditions, enabling efficient GradientSHAP computation. For an industrial High Pressure Grinding Roll (HPGR) control optimisation problem with 22 features, we achieve equivalent SHAP attributions (correlation $>$0.99 with KernelSHAP) with over 40$\times$ speedup, enabling real-time natural language explanations. We validate on industrial scenarios and present feedback from domain experts on generated explanations.

Recent text-to-audio models generate high-quality audio, but often fail to follow instructions involving multiple sound events and temporal order. This gap arises because existing evaluation and training signals mainly emphasize global similarity or perceptual quality, with limited supervision on instruction-level correctness. We propose an instruction-level framework that uses audio-aware large language models (ALLMs) as fine-grained judges to verify target event presence and temporal relations in generated audio. After validating ALLM judgments on benchmarks and through human verification, we use their feedback to construct preference pairs for direct preference optimization. We further introduce S3Bench, a narrative benchmark for evaluating multi-event temporal instruction following. Experiments show that our method improves event completeness, temporal ordering, and joint instruction-following accuracy across existing benchmarks and S3Bench, while maintaining audio quality.

Long-form audio description (AD) requires more than describing visible actions: it must preserve characters, events, relationships, and story context across scenes so that blind and low-vision (BLV) audiences can follow a film. Modern video-language models (VLMs) are effective on short clips, but they often treat each moment independently, producing descriptions that miss who characters are, why events matter, and how the current scene connects to earlier narrative context. We propose StoryTeller, a training-free framework for story-aware long-form AD. Instead of relying only on local visual cues, StoryTeller maintains a verified narrative memory that carries forward story-relevant information across scenes, enabling later descriptions to remain coherent, grounded, and contextually informative. Given only raw video and a movie title, StoryTeller can optionally retrieve public movie metadata to resolve names and story context, while accepting only facts that are supported by the video through semantic filtering and VLM verification. The method requires no subtitles, scripts, AD transcripts, aligned captions, character banks, precomputed face identities, or task-specific fine-tuning. To evaluate whether generated AD preserves narrative information, we introduce StoryAD-QA, a question-answering benchmark that tests whether a language model can answer story-context questions using only the generated descriptions. Experiments on standard AD benchmarks and diverse long-form videos show that StoryTeller consistently improves narrative coherence, factual grounding, and story comprehension over strong baselines in automatic, QA-based, and human evaluations.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as conversational tutors, they risk institutionalizing systemic inequalities. This study presents a systematic API audit of four LLMs acting as history tutors, evaluating 1,800 responses regarding the 1989 Romanian Revolution across five student personas varying by ethnicity and socio-economic tier. We uncover four interconnected patterns of \emph{epistemic paternalism}: (1)\textbf{Differential Refusal}, where safety-aligned models block 76.7% of educational requests from low-tier students; (2)\textbf{Epistemic Gatekeeping}, evidenced by a 3$\times$ reduction in access to geopolitical complexity (e.g., the contested ``coup theory'') for marginalized learners; (3)\textbf{Agency Theft}, a lexical shift where models like LLaMA produce a 5$\times$ higher victimization-to-politics vocabulary ratio for Roma students compared to elite peers; and (4)\textbf{Elite Hermeneutics}, where AI tutors disproportionately withhold epistemic confidence and justification scores from low-resource demographic profiles. We argue that current safety alignment acts as a paternalistic filter, transforming conversational AI into agents of narrative segregation -- a manifestation of \emph{hermeneutical injustice} in Fricker's~\cite{fricker2007} sense that demands urgent pedagogical auditing.

We present Anamnesis, an interactive system for demographically controllable survey simulation using large language models. Open-source and designed for non-technical users/researchers, Anamnesis enables the prototyping and stress-testing of survey instruments on virtual populations rather than real human subjects. The platform operationalizes the recently introduced Anthology and Alterity frameworks, which use structured narrative backstories to condition model responses, within a unified web interface. It supports open-ended generation, probabilistic demographic resampling, and multimodal (image and audio) surveys. We evaluate the system through two case studies: (1) replicating segments of Pew Research Center's American Trends Panel (ATP) on political typology and biomedical issues and (2) emulating human preference in the New Yorker Caption Contest. In both cases, Anamnesis produces opinion distributions that more closely match real-world survey data than standard persona-prompting baselines, offering a transparent, reproducible, and open-source alternative to proprietary simulation services.

Answering complex questions over long documents frequently requires integrating evidence that the source itself disperses naturally across distant passages. In an incident report, the operating condition, design flaw, and missed safety check that jointly explain a disaster may appear dozens of sections apart; in a novel, a character's true motive may surface only through scenes far removed from the moment it becomes relevant. This source-internal evidence integration is central to real-world long-document analysis, yet existing benchmarks largely sidestep it. Needle probes, planted facts, and reverse-engineered multi-hop chains embed evidence that may differ from the host text in distribution, placement, or register, making it unclear whether strong performance reflects genuine source reasoning or distributional artifacts. We introduce WILDTRACE, a benchmark of 481 tasks over 214 naturally occurring long-form sources such as technical incident reports and lesser-known literary narratives, where all evidence trails arise from the document's own causal, temporal, and narrative logic. Drawing on Pearl's causal hierarchy and prior multi-hop reasoning typologies, we define seven source-internal evidence geometries that characterize the distinct relational demands of analytical reading in long documents. A source-first construction pipeline mines candidate trails from document structure before writing questions; each item then undergoes multi-stage validation covering clue necessity, answer groundedness, rubric fidelity, contamination resistance and answerability. As models are increasingly entrusted with real-world high-stakes analytical tasks, this gap between accessing information and reasoning over naturally dispersed evidence emerges as a defining challenge for the next stage of long-context research.

Long-form fiction writers need memory that answers multi-hop questions about evolving story state: who knows a secret and when they learned it, whether an event preceded the narration that revealed it, whether a setup paid off, and how a relationship shifted. General-purpose retrieval and agent-memory systems represent entities and facts but not the narratological structure these questions turn on, so they surface the wrong evidence or none at all. We introduce the Narrative World Model (NWM), a writer-memory system that pairs a narratology-grounded typed temporal-state graph with query-conditioned hybrid retrieval. To measure memory rather than the answerer, we read every system through a single held-constant Opus 4.8 reader over only that system's chapter-safe evidence, on a reproducible public corpus and a validated multi-hop benchmark, and we compare against the strongest existing temporal-knowledge-graph agent-memory framework, Graphiti/Zep (Rasmussen et al., 2025). NWM substantially and significantly outperforms this baseline on multi-hop narratological QA across both corpora, and far exceeds GraphRAG and flat retrieval. The advantage is representational rather than an artifact of extraction: it survives rebuilding the baseline with NWM's own extractor, and traces to its narratology-grounded structure and query-conditioned retrieval, not to graph size or extractor quality.

In this paper, we present the Invariant-Variant Disentangled State-Space Model (IVD-SSM), our submission to SemEval-2026 Task 4 on Narrative Story Similarity and Narrative Representation Learning. Evaluating narrative similarity is a profound computational challenge that requires models to look past concrete, superficial elements such as specific names, actors, objects, or settings to isolate and compare abstract patterns of causality and plot progression. To model these extended causal chains without the quadratic bottlenecks of standard Transformers, we leverage a hybrid State-Space Model (Jamba-1.5-Mini). Building upon this backbone, we introduce the Structurally Gated Alignment (SGA) head, a novel, differentiable algorithmic architecture. The SGA head operates on two scales: a heavily strided Macro-path maps the coarse structural skeleton of a story, which then acts as a gating mechanism to filter a full-resolution Micro-path, actively suppressing semantic noise and superficial keyword overlaps. Evaluated on both pairwise comparative judgments (Track A) and dense representation learning (Track B), our approach demonstrates that explicitly disentangling structural invariants from lexical variants provides a robust, principled framework for deep narrative understanding.

As LLMs are increasingly deployed as autonomous adjudicators in semi-open textual game environments, robust rule adherence becomes critical when user intent conflicts with system rules. However, these models are trained to be helpful and compliant, leaving them vulnerable to a class of attacks we term \textit{Rhetorical Injection}, where adversarial users exploit narrative framing techniques such as pseudo-logical reasoning and authoritative coercion to bypass adjudication logic. We present CoC-Seduce, a multi-agent adversarial benchmark built on Tabletop Role-Playing Game (TRPG) mechanics, an ideal instantiation of semi-open environments where rules are explicit for adjudication, yet interaction remains entirely in natural language. Three frontier models, i.e., GPT-5.4, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 3.5 Flash, serve as adversarial generators producing 5,376 samples across 4 world settings and 16 skill categories. We then benchmark 20 target adjudicators against this corpus. Evaluation across 20 models reveals that neither model scale nor explicit reasoning mechanisms reliably confer adjudication robustness, with \textsc{Pseudo-Logic} emerging as the dominant attack vector and cross-cultural settings exposing systematic knowledge gaps across all evaluated families. Project page: https://github.com/answerrtx/CoC-Seduce

Narration is central to the audiobook listening experience, shaping how listeners engage with and understand the content. This work explores how narration qualities shape an audiobook's appeal, noting that their effects can vary by genre, title, and audience. We extract vocal and acoustic features (e.g., tone, pace, loudness) from LibriVox using pre-trained audio models and analyse their relationship with consumption data (specifically, view-rate) and their interplay with genre and title. Despite limited consumption data, we find that acoustic information alone has a robust association with appeal, even after accounting for title effects. We further validate these findings using more nuanced proprietary engagement metrics. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic computational study linking narration qualities, genre, title, and audiobook consumption, highlighting the potential of data-driven insights to improve audiobook personalisation and narrator casting.

Visual narratives are central to storyboards, comics, children's media, and film previsualization, where viewers understand stories from images alone. Recent generators such as StoryDiffusion produce coherent sequences, but visual coherence does not guarantee that source-story transition meaning remains recoverable. Existing benchmarks assess visual quality, content faithfulness, and scene coherence, but miss a critical failure mode: storyboards where scenes appear visually coherent while the semantic link between scenes disappears. We introduce KathaTrace, a generator-agnostic protocol for diagnosing semantic trajectory collapse, defined as the loss of transition meaning needed to understand how one scene follows another. KathaTrace evaluates transitions under three evidence conditions: text-only, image-only, and text-plus-image, and filters ambiguous items. We contribute KathaBench-25K, with 5,000 narratives from classical collections including Aesop, Panchatantra, and Kathasaritasagara, 20,000 transitions, and 28,712 recoverability questions. We define Semantic Trajectory Gap, or STG, as text-only minus image-only recoverability, measuring transition meaning lost during visualization. Human validation yields Fleiss' kappa = 0.845. Experiments across state-of-the-art generators show substantial STG of 23.5 +/- 1.3. Semantic Compass, an actionability probe, uses KathaTrace signals for post-generation repair and improves storyboard selection.

Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive creative fiction generation, they struggle to maintain narrative consistency and coherent plot lines in long-form stories. In this work, we introduce a unified framework for long-form narrative generation and verification. MAGNET, a multi-agent goal-driven narrative engine for storytelling, generates stories with persona-grounded character agents that propose actions based on a shared world state and evolving story goals, while ATLAS is a graph-based pipeline that compares scene-level world representations across a generated story to detect hallucinations. By evaluating MAGNET using an LLM editor, pairwise rubric scoring, and ATLAS, we show that our framework produces coherent narratives compared to single-model prompting and IBSEN. At 100 pages, MAGNET reduced annotations and hallucinations by 41 and 50%, respectively, compared to the single model baseline and by 34 and 45%, respectively, compared to IBSEN, with pairwise rubric evaluation showing similar results. These results suggest that long-form narratives can emerge from explicit world-state tracking and goal-driven multi-agent generation, providing a foundation for controllable and structurally coherent long-form narrative generation.