Relevance

E-commerce search requires distinguishing products that are merely related to a query from those that directly satisfy the user's shopping intent. We augment query-product pairs with structured LLM-generated query and product attributes and human-validated relevance, explanations, and centrality judgments, and evaluate these signals using a simple dual-encoder retriever and MLP re-ranker. On an augmented subset of ESCI, a human-feature oracle reaches $0.9382$ nDCG@10, while a human-free trained $Q+P$ configuration reaches $0.9258$. Synthetic approximations of the human signals reach $0.9150$ overall but provide substantial gains for difficult, low-performing queries. Ablations show that most of the oracle improvement comes from post-edited explanations and annotator comments rather than the scalar centrality feature, suggesting that LLMs are most useful for exposing and approximating structured semantic supervision rather than replacing human judgment directly.

When aligning frontier models through post-training techniques, it is not possible to directly demonstrate all of the behaviours we want a model to exhibit in all possible deployment environments; our model must generalise outside of the post-training distribution. One proposed solution is alignment midtraining (AMT), which continues pretraining on large volumes of alignment-relevant documents to encourage generalisation in later stages of training. Despite the prominence of AMT as an alignment approach, there is limited public evidence for its effectiveness. To resolve this, we identify several assumptions around midtraining and evaluate them across scale: up to 110 billion-parameter models and 1 billion midtraining tokens. For instance, we study a scenario where post-training data is ambiguous between two possible motivations. We find that midtraining can steer the model's motivation in simple versions of this setting. However, the presence of a tiny fraction of finetuning data which suggests a competing motivation erases the effects of AMT. We also study scenarios in which we want an AI to follow a number of rules, but only demonstrate a subset of them. We find that demonstrations must be present either in midtraining or post-training datasets for these rules to be robustly learned. Based on these and other findings, we do not believe that there is sufficient public evidence for us to confidently state that midtraining can address the core difficulties inherent in aligning powerful AI systems.

Reasoning-based reranking with Large Language Models (LLMs) has shown promising improvements in text ranking. However, current methods predominantly rely on a single reasoning trajectory, resulting in rankings that are susceptible to reasoning errors and inherently constrained in modeling the multifaceted signals underlying document relevance. To resolve this dilemma, we propose MERIT-Rank(Multi-perspective Evidence and Reasoning Integration for Text Reranking), a framework that models complementary reasoning trajectories to improve reranking robustness. MERIT-Rank formulates a Multi-Trajectory Reasoning Space (MTRS) that evaluates query-document relevance from multiple perspectives and introduces a joint reranker that consolidates these reasoning paths into a unified ranking decision. We further develop Progressive Rank Policy Optimization (PRPO), a progressive training framework that stabilizes reasoning trajectories while continually improving ranking quality through staged optimization objectives. Experiments on both reasoning-intensive and traditional retrieval benchmarks show that MERIT-Rank consistently achieves superior performance over competitive baselines. The 4B model notably outperforms most 7B and even 32B rerankers on BRIGHT.

Feature importance is central to interpretable machine learning, but the term "importance" encompasses several fundamentally different notions of relevance. We develop a unified perspective based on null importance: a population-level characterization of when a feature is irrelevant under a specified notion of relevance. We consider standard notions of null importance arising from marginal and conditional statistical relevance, predictive risk, functional invariance, and causal effects, and show how these notions answer different scientific questions. We illustrate the framework in two applications in which the distinction is particularly consequential: algorithmic fairness, where common fairness criteria correspond to different notions of null importance, and genomic perturbation modeling, where different notions of relevance lead to different conclusions about what a prediction model has learned. The framework connects three aspects of feature analysis: the scientific question defining relevance, the data and model assumptions that shape how different null notions relate, and the methods used to assess importance. We establish sufficient conditions under which null notions coincide and give counterexamples showing how they diverge when those conditions fail. We then characterize which nulls different method families target and when their zero-importance statistics identify those targets. Finally, simulations spanning feature dependence, redundancy, nonlinearity, hidden features and other standard phenomena, along with case studies on image and multiomics data, provide empirical evidence for these theoretical distinctions and their practical consequences. Taken together, these results provide a common statistical language for relating scientific questions, data-generating assumptions, and algorithms, and clarify the conclusions that feature-importance analyses can support.

Attention-based rerankers score documents by aggregating query-to-document attention and subtracting a null-query calibration pass to remove positional and structural bias. Although widely used, this calibration assumes that the null pass removes irrelevant signal from each document. We show that modern prompt content, e.g. constraints, instructions, personas, and demonstrations can violate this assumption when it enters the scoring readout, making the null pass relevance-aware rather than null. We find that calibration is especially harmful when applied to prompts containing longer, more detailed instructions as the null-pass step removes relevant signal. Based on these findings, we propose interpolated null calibration, a training-free modification that controls how much of the instruction content enters the null baseline. It recovers attention-based reranking performance on instruction-heavy tasks where standard calibration fails, while preserving calibration's benefits when the null pass remains relevance-agnostic. On instruction heavy tasks, the recovered rankings surpass generative rerankers. We also show that in-context demonstrations improve attention-based reranking with little calibration interference, since demonstrations act only through the query pass and leave the null pass unchanged.

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting is critical for corporate accountability, with Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) offering strong potential to automate KPI extraction. However, open-source LLM performance in domain-specific ESG tasks remains insufficiently understood. This paper evaluates open-source LLMs in ESG contexts using a structured framework and evaluation resource based on 498 real-world ESG reports from EU-listed companies (2010-2024). We evaluate seven open-source models (2B to 30B parameters) -- glm-4.7-flash, nemotron-3-nano:4b, qwen3:4b-instruct, gemma3:4b, gemma4:e4b, gemma4:e2b, and ministral-3:8b -- using 100 persona-based synthetic QA pairs covering ESG information needs. System performance is assessed via RAGAS metrics, including contextual recall, precision, relevance, faithfulness, answer relevancy, and factual correctness. Results show notable performance variations across architectures. Retrieval performance is strong across models (context recall around 0.58-0.61, context precision around 0.78-0.81, context relevance 0.965-0.985). Generation diverges most on faithfulness (0.607-0.822) and least on answer relevancy (0.760-0.881): glm-4.7-flash leads in faithfulness (0.822), qwen3 in factual correctness (0.449), and ministral-3 in answer relevancy (0.881). Low overall factual correctness (0.387-0.449) highlights the need for domain-specific fine-tuning. This work provides data-driven guidance for deploying open-source models in ESG reporting.

Industrial query-to-agent matching fails when topical relevance is mistaken for executable capability, especially on long-tail and boundary-sensitive requests. We formulate annotation as \emph{capability-bound process supervision} and instantiate it with Debate-to-Skill, which uses reusable decision principles, structured deliberation, verifier-based verdict extraction, and disagreement-driven refinement. On an industrial Query2Agent benchmark, we compare Debate-to-Skill with direct-label supervision, reasoning-SFT, and structural ablations. The results test whether gains come from supervising the capability-critical decision process itself, especially on grey-zone cases where semantic relatedness and executable capability diverge.

Turn-taking is a fundamental mechanism that governs when interlocutors speak and listen. Although Spoken Dialogue Systems (SDS) exploit a range of linguistic, acoustic, and non-verbal cues, they produce ill-timed responses in unscripted interaction. A central challenge is anticipating Transition Relevance Places (TRPs), or opportunities, not obligations, for a listener to take the floor. Human listeners do not wait for turn endings; as an utterance unfolds, they use expectations about its developing meaning to anticipate TRPs and decide whether to take the floor. We examine whether these evolving expectations can be modeled through semantic uncertainty -- an LLM-derived measure of how strongly a turn so far constrains what may plausibly come next. To do so, we sample possible continuations of an ongoing turn and use changes in semantic dispersion to identify TRPs within turns. We evaluate this account on a dataset with TRP labels derived from real-time listener responses, rather than retrospective annotation. Our approach substantially outperforms prompt-based and fine-tuned text-only baselines, providing empirical support for the view that evolving semantic constraints inform perceived turn-taking opportunities in unscripted interaction.

Evaluating first-stage retrievers in large-scale production RAG requires a benchmark that pairs a large-scale corpus with a large set of agent-reformulated search queries based on real user queries and their conversation threads, and that labels many relevant documents per query. No existing public benchmark evaluates this setting: large-scale collections typically provide only a small number of evaluation queries, whereas benchmarks with many queries generally contain only millions of documents. Moreover, most benchmarks assess human-written queries, while the first-stage retrievers in agentic RAG pipelines serve machine-written reformulations whose distribution differs from human search behavior. To overcome these evaluation gaps, we introduce Q2D-Web (Query2Doc-Web), a large-scale agentic retrieval benchmark consisting of a 190M-document web corpus and 70k agentic search queries in ten languages, reformulated from real-world user queries in production systems. Q2D-Web provides three sets of fixed relevance judgments: agent citations, production rankings, and a combined set that unions both signals and adds LLM-based judgments of unlabeled pooled documents to reduce false negatives. We benchmark 13 retrievers including lexical, dense, and late-interaction models and find that their relative ordering is largely insensitive to the choice of judgment set, while diverging substantially across topical domains, query languages, and query types. To enable fast evaluation, we also study subcorpus sampling as an approximation to full-corpus evaluations. Retaining a third of the corpus, selected by reciprocal rank fusion over pooled retriever runs, preserves the full-corpus model ranking under the combined judgments while raising absolute Recall@1000 only by 3 to 7 points. The public leaderboard is accessible under: https://huggingface.co/spaces/perplexity-ai/q2d-web-leaderboard

Key-value (KV) cache eviction is essential for scaling long-context inference in Large Language Models. However, existing policies predominantly rely on empirical heuristics, lacking a rigorous characterization of token utility under the inherently nonlinear softmax attention mechanism. In this work, we rethink KV cache eviction through the lens of local information geometry, modeling the attention process as a nonlinear Gaussian communication channel. By performing a first-order Taylor expansion of the attention mapping, we derive the Jacobian Information Capacity, a novel objective that explicitly captures query relevance, softmax sensitivity, and structural diversity. Guided by this theory, we introduce Jacap, a capacity-aware eviction method that utilizes softmax-aware importance weighting and statistical leverage scores for subset selection. Extensive experiments across diverse architectures and benchmarks demonstrate that \textsc{Jacap} delivers superior performance in most scenarios, particularly in high-compression regimes.

Incomplete multi-view multi-label learning requires not only robust semantic aggregation from partially observed views, but also label-aware exploitation of view-specific evidence. Existing approaches usually emphasize either shared representation learning or decision-level fusion. The former improves robustness against missing views, yet tends to compress label-discriminative view-specific cues into a single latent representation. The latter preserves individual view predictions, but often relies on fixed or globally learned fusion weights, ignoring that different labels of different instances may require different views. To address these limitations, this paper presents V2L, a unified representation-decision framework for incomplete multi-view multi-label classification. On the representation side, V2L constructs semantically consistent variational posteriors from incomplete views through a perturbation-aware encoding mechanism, which provides a stable shared semantic basis. On the decision side, V2L introduces an active view-label relevance modeling strategy that estimates instance-wise and label-wise view contributions, allowing each label prediction to adaptively select useful view-specific evidence. From the perspective of model architecture, these two important strategies are integrated into a unified framework through a hybrid fusion architecture, simultaneously meeting the requirements of cross-view semantic consistency and representational complementarity. Extensive experiments under both incomplete and complete settings show that V2L achieves leading performance on five benchmarks. Code is available at: https://github.com/justsmart/V2L.

Recent generative music models offer increasingly fine-grained control through text and audio conditioning, yet how faithfully they follow intended emotional cues remains an open question. We address this gap with a unified evaluation pipeline for emotion-following in generated music. Using all 1000 tracks in GTZAN, we extract semantic audio descriptions with DashengLM, an audio captioning model, and estimate source-track valence and arousal with Music2Emotion, a music emotion recognition model. We construct affect-aware text prompts by combining descriptions with top-ranked emotion tags and generate 30-second outputs with three systems, Stable Audio Open, MusicGen, and InspireMusic, evaluating both text- and audio-conditioned generation. To measure emotion-following, we compute valence and arousal on generated audio and compare them with the source tracks using absolute error and Euclidean distance in valence-arousal space. Text-conditioned generation consistently outperforms audio conditioning, with MusicGen (text) and InspireMusic (text) achieving the best performance, while audio-conditioned variants prove less stable. We further find that valence is preserved more reliably than arousal and that emotion-following varies substantially across genres. These findings underscore the importance of evaluating affective controllability directly rather than relying solely on general quality or prompt-relevance metrics.

Long videos contain far more visual content than Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) can process under a fixed visual-token budget, making frame selection essential. Existing query-aware selectors usually estimate frame-query relevance and build a compact subset from high-scoring frames. Although their mechanisms differ, the similarity sequence is still often treated primarily as values to rank or sample from, rather than as an ordered signal whose shape reflects how query-relevant evidence emerges, peaks, and fades over time. This can obscure frames that explain, contextualize, or follow an event, because such evidence may lie on the rising or falling sides of a nearby relevance peak and receive lower absolute scores. We propose RIDGE, a frame selection framework that reads the frame-query similarity curve as a temporal signal. By using local changes and curvature, RIDGE partitions the timeline into structural regions and applies region-specific selection to preserve event cores, transitions, buildup, aftermath, and contextual frames under a fixed budget. It is a lightweight post-processing step on precomputed frame-query scores and requires neither training nor iterative LVLM calls. Across four long-video benchmarks and three backbones, RIDGE achieves the best performance in most settings and remains competitive in the others.

Historical retrieval for time-series prediction commonly treats past similarity as a proxy for usefulness. We ask a different question: which historical examples should be expected to matter for a query? We define predictive relevance as expected future utility conditioned on inference-time information, using realized futures only during training as privileged supervision. A normalized-pattern retriever first forms a coarse candidate set, and a lightweight residual multilayer perceptron (MLP) learns a listwise future-compatibility target while keeping inference-time scoring strictly past-only. Our method retains similarity-based candidate generation but reranks its candidates by a more predictive relevance criterion. Optimal relevance decomposes into candidate-level utility and query-specific compatibility, motivating Candidate-Prior and Shuffled-Future controls. Across six benchmarks, the reranker improves Pattern retrieval while revealing candidate-global, query-specific, and mixed relevance regimes. On all 12 confirmatory tasks, it improves Pattern and outperforms a matched-protocol Stationarity-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Time Series Forecasting (SARAF) retrieval rule. Architecture-matched ablations show that correct future supervision, rather than the MLP or added context alone, drives gains in query-specific regimes. Alternative-similarity experiments show that a strong last-value-anchored L2 rule remains superior in some domains, whereas future-supervised relevance is particularly strong where our diagnostics indicate query-specific relevance, especially on Solar. Candidate-pool diagnostics show that this contrast is not explained solely by coarse Pattern retrieval. Overall, historical relevance is structured and domain dependent rather than governed by a universally superior retrieval rule.

On-policy distillation (OPD) supervises a student language model on trajectories sampled from its current policy, but assigns equal credit to response tokens with unequal supervision value. Selective OPD addresses this limitation by allocating supervision non-uniformly across response tokens according to their estimated training value. Most existing criteria, however, focus primarily on optimization need, such as uncertainty or teacher-student disagreement, while task relevance, namely whether the supervision is tied to the semantic content of the current input, remains less directly characterized as a complementary dimension. To address this gap, we introduce Counterfactual Relevance for On-Policy Distillation (CROP), which operationalizes task relevance through a paraphrase-calibrated counterfactual sensitivity margin. For each source prompt, CROP constructs a validated original-paraphrase-counterfactual triplet, holds the student rollout fixed, and measures each response position by its sensitivity to a task-relevant condition change calibrated by its sensitivity to a meaning-preserving rewrite. Matched selection controls show that CROP identifies more useful supervision positions than random or lowest-relevance selection, while component comparisons confirm the value of both counterfactual sensitivity and paraphrase calibration. Across two teacher-student settings, CROP improves aggregate performance by 1.92 and 2.96 points over the strongest non-CROP selector. These results support task relevance as a complementary criterion for selective OPD and establish CROP as a model-internal, contrast-specific method for allocating token-level supervision.

Generative information retrieval (GIR) has emerged as a compelling alternative to the conventional index-retrieve-then-rank retrieval pipeline by training a generator to produce the identifiers of relevant items directly. Despite its promise, a number of open challenges still remain. First, constrained left-to-right decoding is vulnerable to prefix-level errors and local optima. Second, most prior GIR research remains largely unimodal, leaving instruction-aware retrieval across text, image, and mixed image-text items underexplored. Third, although discrete identifier-based GIR offers higher efficiency, its retrieval accuracy still lags behind that of the cutting-edge dense-vector-based retrieval methods. Motivated by these challenges, we propose DrIG, a novel Generative framework for universal multimodal retrieval featuring Dual-role Identifiers, which supports diverse retrieval tasks across multiple modalities and domains. Each candidate is assigned a single residual-quantized identifier that serves two complementary roles. In its sequential role, the identifier is decoded autoregressively, where the first token explicitly models modality and the remaining tokens capture progressively finer semantics. In its set-based role, the same tokens are reinterpreted as an unordered set to provide a prefix-independent relevance prior, which guides constrained beam search and alleviates local-optimum errors. Extensive experiments on the M-BEIR benchmark and the text-to-image evaluation datasets show that:(1)DrIG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art generative multimodal baselines across diverse tasks, while hybrid reranking achieves a favorable efficiency-effectiveness trade-off against strong dense retrievers. (2)Ablation and scaling analyses reveal how the base LMM, beam size, reranking depth, and fusion strategy affect retrieval performance, providing practical guidance for system design.

Few-shot in-context learning (ICL) with multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) enables task adaptation without parameter updates, but its performance is highly sensitive to the quality and coverage of the selected demonstrations. While unlabeled multi-modal data is abundant, it remains elusive how to exploit them for ICL. We propose MAG (MAnifold-Guided semi-supervised in-context demonstra- tion selection), an efficient framework that leverages unlabeled data to improve multi-modal ICL. MAG formulates demonstration selection as a semi-supervised propagation problem on a multi-modal graph and adopts a two-stage strategy: (i) relevance score propagation identifies a compact set of high-impact unlabeled samples for pseudo-labeling, reducing MLLM inference cost; (ii) multi-modal relevance is used to select the final demonstrations. We show that textual represen- tations are more effective for relevance propagation, while both visual and textual modalities are crucial for high-quality demonstration selection. Experiments on eight multi-modal benchmarks demonstrate that MAG consistently outperforms strong baselines in label-scarce regimes, achieving significant gains with a limited pseudo-labeling budget.

Long-horizon egocentric memory transforms continuous first-person video and audio into a searchable record of past experiences. We demonstrate two bottlenecks in existing systems: indices built from context-poor captions are unreliable for agentic search, while retrieval ignores a question's temporal intent. To address both bottlenecks, we introduce EgoCITE (Egocentric Context-augmented Indexing and Time-aware Evidence retrieval), a long-horizon agentic memory framework for egocentric QA. EgoCITE comprises three components. EgoScheme uses local multimodal context to turn fragmentary video captions and speech transcripts into self-contained atomic memory indices. EgoIndex organizes complementary action, activity, utterance, and conversation representations into searchable multi-view memory indices at multiple granularities. EgoRetrv combines semantic search with question-conditioned temporal relevance scoring and curation of retrieved evidence. We evaluate EgoCITE on EgoLifeQA, EgoMem, and EgoR1-Bench in terms of answer accuracy and target-event retrieval alignment. EgoCITE improves accuracy over agentic memory baselines by at least 4.4--14.2% while achieving 36$\times$ lower cost than long-context LLM agents.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based prospective anomaly detection methods are increasingly deployed in high-dimensional and nonlinear settings. Among these approaches, AI-based statistical process monitoring (SPM) is widely used, providing a structured framework for prospective monitoring. Once an anomaly is detected, a diagnosis method is needed to identify the features driving the flagged observation away from normal behaviour. Traditional SPM diagnosis methods are typically designed for specific detection models and cannot be directly applied to AI-based methods. Model-agnostic explainable AI (XAI) offers a general framework for feature relevance explanation. However, existing methods suffer from scalability limitations or assign relevance to noise features, reducing diagnosis accuracy. We propose a scalable, baseline-referenced diagnosis method that uses both the anomalous observation and normal baseline information. We provide mathematical guarantees that under a mean-shift anomaly setting, the proposed method achieves higher faithfulness in detecting the features causing the anomaly compared to LIME. Simulation studies and a real-world case study validate the effectiveness of the proposed method and show that it generates more faithful and accurate diagnosis results for AI-based prospective anomaly detection methods.

Web search, product search, and question-answering retrieval systems often assign a relevance label and confidence score to each query-candidate pair. The relevance label describes how well a page, product, or passage matches the query, while the confidence often guides downstream use or fallback decisions. Post-hoc calibration is therefore needed because misaligned confidence can make systems over-trust wrong predictions or unnecessarily defer correct ones. However, calibration mainly aligns confidence with average correctness, and does not remove predicted-label-dependent reliability differences that remain within the same calibrated confidence level. We address this gap with Label-wise Monotone Reliability Projection (MRP), which learns label-wise monotone functions that map calibrated confidence to correctness reliability while preserving the original predicted labels and class probabilities. The resulting reliability score reranks fixed predictions according to residual risk. Across six information access relevance datasets and multiple post-hoc calibrators, MRP improves reliability reranking and average fallback utility while preserving full-coverage accuracy and ECE. Structural ablations show that the main gains come from label-wise residual reliability rather than from global confidence remapping. We further analyze when MRP reliability scores can be embedded back into top-label probability geometry, showing that this projection is useful as a compatibility analysis but is distinct from the main reliability-reranking objective. The implementation will be made publicly available.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as relevance assessors in information retrieval (IR) evaluation, raising questions about how assessor framing affects judgment reliability and downstream system comparison. We study persona conditioning as a diagnostic mechanism for exposing LLM assessor sensitivity. Using task-oriented personas drawn from two complementary sources (PersonaHub and NVIDIA Nemotron-Personas-USA), we instantiate five assessor roles emphasizing intent interpretation, domain expertise, contrastive judgment, evidence verification, and global search-quality assessment, compared with a standard UMBRELA baseline. Across six LLM backbones on TREC DL20 and RAG24, our analyses reveal structured rather than uniform assessor sensitivity. Judgments usually remain close to the baseline while shifting assessment strictness, evidential threshold, or interpretation emphasis rather than producing widespread relevance reversals. At the system level, high-capacity models preserve system-ranking agreement, while smaller models amplify persona-induced instability. Local rank-displacement analysis shows sensitivity concentrates on particular retrieval systems and system types, especially neural ranking/reranking systems on DL20 and RAG-oriented pipelines on RAG24. Persona source matters less than assessor role and model capacity. These findings position persona-conditioned judging as a controlled sensitivity probe for stress-testing LLM-based IR evaluation pipelines and identifying systems whose evaluation outcomes are sensitive to assessor framing.

Agent skills are increasingly used to equip large language model (LLM) agents with reusable procedural knowledge. Although recent work has substantially improved skill retrieval due to the increasing skill libraries, retrieving a plausible skill bundle does not guarantee that executing it is worthwhile. Since every skill-conditioned rollout is computationally expensive, deciding whether a retrieved bundle should be executed has become an increasingly important challenge. To this end, we introduce the Reward-Aware Dynamic Execution Gate (RADEG), a lightweight, retriever-agnostic decision layer between skill retrieval and agent execution. RADEG learns a low-cost surrogate model that predicts the execution utility of a query--bundle pair before the expensive rollout is launched. To obtain informative supervision while controlling for task difficulty, we locally perturb each retrieved bundle by deleting, adding, or replacing one skill, producing matched same-query rollouts that isolate the effect of bundle composition on verifier reward. During deployment, RADEG updates only a warm-started logistic head as new verifier feedback becomes available, enabling inexpensive adaptation of the execute/skip boundary without retraining either the retriever or the agent. Under a query-level held-out evaluation on 288 collected rollouts, RADEG substantially reduces unnecessary agent executions while preserving a large fraction of the downstream verifier reward. It consistently outperforms relevance-based and random gating across different execution budgets, demonstrating that execution-aware surrogate modeling provides a practical and cost-effective complement to skill retrieval.

Recently, retrieval-augmented and memory-augmented methods have emerged as two promising paradigms for long-video question answering. However, existing methods typically rely on rigid, fixed-length temporal chunking (e.g., 10s) and static offline memory banks, which not only fragment coherent continuous events but also fail to adapt during real-time reasoning. Moreover, whether using multi-scale summaries or multimodal knowledge graphs, current approaches prioritize retrieval relevance while overlooking evidence sufficiency, often stopping to answer once only semantically relevant clues are retrieved, even when key temporal, causal, or fine-grained action evidence is still missing. To tackle these challenges, we propose REVEAL, a rubric-guided agent framework. As a foundation, we introduce an adaptive visual-similarity-based preprocessing pipeline that groups visually coherent adjacent frames into natural event units to construct an offline-online video memory---capturing global video context offline while dynamically maintaining question-conditioned memory online. Built upon this structured memory, REVEAL uses an automatically constructed rubric library to explicitly verify whether retrieved evidence satisfies sufficiency criteria, pinpoints missing clues upon verification failure, and directs targeted re-retrieval for complementary information. Without any extra training, REVEAL consistently outperforms both closed-source and open-source state-of-the-art methods across extensive experiments. These results show that explicitly verifying evidence sufficiency, rather than stopping at semantic relevance, retrieves the decisive clues that prior methods miss and yields more reliable long-video reasoning.

Industrial recommendation systems predominantly adopt a passive ranking paradigm that infers user preferences from implicit behavioral signals (e.g., clicks, dwell time) rather than explicit, natural language inputs. As a result, users experience a persistent discrepancy between their explicit interests and what passive behavioral algorithms deliver, limiting their ability to express nuanced preferences or steer their feed in real time. To address this growing gap between how recommendations are optimized and how users wish to articulate their interests, we present Shape Your Feed (SYF), an LLM-based agentic recommendation framework that enables real-time, multimodal co-curation of content. SYF employs a three-tier architecture: (i) a Perception Flow that captures fine-grained user intent from text prompts, voice commands, and UI interactions; (ii) a Serving Flow that performs real-time agentic re-ranking and pruning of candidate items, grounded in a persistent Semantic Profile encoding evolving user preferences; and (iii) a Self-Evolution Flow that aligns system behavior with human judgments via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and an LLM-as-a-Judge ensemble. Offline evaluations show that SYF's alignment scoring module achieves 98.85% accuracy, substantially improving over strong few-shot baselines. Large-scale online A/B experiments on production traffic further demonstrate that SYF improves feed relevance and user sentiment, indicating a practical and scalable path toward interactive, user-steerable recommendation in industrial settings.

Whole-slide image (WSI) reasoning requires an agent to sequentially acquire visual evidence before answering a diagnostic question. Existing training-free agentic frameworks formulate this process as iterative patch retrieval based on semantic relevance to the question. However, semantic relevance does not necessarily imply diagnostic informativeness in computational pathology, where competing diagnoses often exhibit similar and overlapping morphological patterns, making many patches semantically relevant yet diagnostically non-discriminative. Consequently, relevance-based retrieval may acquire redundant observations and leave diagnostic uncertainty unresolved. We propose BEACON, a plug-and-play agentic framework that reformulates WSI reasoning as a Bayesian evidence acquisition problem. BEACON maintains a probabilistic belief over competing diagnostic hypotheses and sequentially acquires patches by maximizing expected information gain (EIG) to reduce diagnostic uncertainty. An evidence controller then determines whether to answer, acquire additional evidence, or perform higher-resolution inspection. Built entirely from off-the-shelf foundation models, BEACON requires no additional training or fine-tuning. Extensive zero-shot experiments across five WSI-VQA benchmarks demonstrate that BEACON achieves the strongest overall performance among training-free agentic frameworks while substantially improving evidence acquisition efficiency, establishing Bayesian evidence acquisition as a principled paradigm for uncertainty-aware agentic WSI reasoning. The code is available at https://github.com/bryanwong17/BEACON

Frame selection is essential for applying Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) to long videos due to severe frame redundancy and limited context windows. Since the appropriate frame budget varies with the downstream LMM, reasoning demands, and latency constraints, a practical selector should serve multiple budgets. However, existing methods typically optimize an isolated frame subset for each predefined budget: when the budget changes, previously selected evidence may be replaced rather than progressively augmented. Ranking frames by a fixed score would allow prefix reuse across budgets, but it ignores the distinct roles of different ranking positions. In this paper, we formulate long-video frame selection as a Matryoshka ranking problem: constructing a single priority sequence whose small prefixes concentrate query-conditioned evidence, while progressively larger prefixes preserve this evidence and add broader temporal context. Efficiently constructing such a ranking is itself challenging, as densely sampling long videos and evaluating frame-query relevance incurs substantial overhead. We therefore introduce Matryoshka Evidence-to-Context (MEC) Frame Selection, a training-free framework that builds a reusable sparse video index, discovers candidates through sparse probing and local zooming, and greedily constructs a position-adaptive ranking: early positions emphasize evidence; later positions progressively favor temporal coverage while preserving visual diversity. A single ranking can thus be truncated to any target budget without rerunning the selector. Across four benchmarks and six frame budgets, MEC improves average accuracy over uniform sampling by 3.77 percentage points, matches strong state-of-the-art selectors, and reduces end-to-end selection latency by 47.37-51.19%.

Scientific images are essential for communicating experimental observations, quantitative evidence and conceptual knowledge. Unlike natural images, their quality depends on both visual clarity and scientific informativeness, making assessment challenging. In this work, we present SciQNet, a two-stage multimodal adaptation framework for scientific image quality assessment. The first stage performs domain-adaptive pretraining on scientific document images and the second stage conducts task-specific fine-tuning with joint scoring and understanding supervision. For scoring-oriented supervision, we combine instruction tuning with a Huber loss derived from rating-word logits, while understanding-oriented supervision is formulated as multiple-choice visual question answering. Experiments show that using a 40% stratified subset of the domain-adaptive data gives the best performance among the evaluated pretraining fractions, suggesting that pretraining-data relevance may be as important as pretraining-data scale. The final model achieves an SIQA-S score of 92.21, an SIQA-U score of 47.38 and a combined score of 69.80. This work presents our solution to the ICME 2026 Scientific Image Quality Assessment Challenge, which ranked 2nd in the scoring track.

Retrieval systems help deep research agents generate high-quality answers by providing relevant documents. However, existing retrievers typically select documents through relevance matching, while individually well-matched top-$k$ documents may not form a \textit{set} that satisfies the complex information needs of an agent query (\eg, diverse, concise and authoritative documents). In this paper, we propose search-oriented rubrics that \textit{explicitly} define the requirements that high-quality document sets should satisfy for each agent query. Our search rubrics are organized into a hierarchical structure and synthesized using a powerful LLM. Based on these search rubrics, we further train a document reranker \textbf{RubricRanker} to select a high-quality subset from retrieved documents. We design a two-stage training framework that consists of rubrics-guided supervised fine-tuning and rubric-based reinforcement learning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RubricRanker outperforms the strongest baseline by 2.6 points on four deep research benchmarks and generalizes well to five RAG benchmarks.

Generative retrieval (GR) is a promising paradigm for industrial search advertising, yet its deployment is constrained by strict relevance and latency requirements. Existing systems cascade GR with an independent relevance model, decoupling the generative likelihood objective from query-ad relevance discrimination, which compromises effectiveness and increases serving costs. We propose a Unified Generative-Discriminative framework (UniGD) that integrates retrieval and relevance scoring within a single model. To mitigate gradient interference in joint optimization, UniGD introduces Conflict-Aware Gradient Enhancement (CAGE) to adaptively coordinate the two objectives. UniGD further designs a Codebook-Anchored Representation Module (CAM) that anchors item representations to frozen hierarchical codebooks distilled from a multimodal pretrained model, thereby endowing them with rich and generalizable semantic priors. For heterogeneous short-video, product, and live-stream ads, UniGD proposes Heterogeneous Ad-material Modeling (HAM), which captures cross-type semantic commonality over a shared backbone while preserving type-specific modeling capacity. Online AB tests on Kuaishou search advertising platform show that UniGD raises ad revenue by 5.78%, reduces inference latency by 33%, and improves discriminative relevance estimation. On NQ320K and MS300K, UniGD improves Recall@10 over the strongest reproduced GR baseline by 8.44% and 3.19%, respectively.

Quadruped robots are a promising platform for search and rescue missions because they can navigate cluttered indoor environments that may be restrictive for wheeled systems. However, in unknown rescue scenarios, autonomous exploration must balance map expansion with the likelihood of finding victims, which is not explicitly addressed by clas- sical frontier selection strategies. This paper presents a situation aware frontier prioritization method for single robot quadruped search and rescue. The proposed approach preserves the frontier exploration framework, but extends frontier ranking with information gain, observation deficit, rescue relevance, terrain penalty, and travel cost. The method is eval- uated in Gazebo simulation with a quadruped robot in two indoor rescue scenarios with different levels of difficulty. The first scenario is used as a sanity check, while the second introduces stronger clutter and frontier ambiguity. Experimental results show that all methods perform reliably in a simple scenario, whereas in a complex scenario is different. In that setting, the proposed method achieves the highest completion rate and the highest victim recovery among the evaluated approaches. These results indicate that situation aware frontier prioritization is beneficial when frontier choice becomes nontrivial and rescue utility must be balanced against generic exploration objectives.

Relevance evaluation plays a crucial role in personalized search systems, serving as a guardrail alongside user engagement metrics to ensure that search results align with user queries and intent. While human annotation is the traditional method for relevance evaluation, its high cost and long turnaround time limit its scalability. In this work, we present a VLM-based automated relevance evaluation pipeline deployed within Pinterest Search for online A/B experiments. We rigorously validate the alignment between VLM-generated judgments and human annotations, demonstrating that VLMs can provide reliable relevance measurement for experiments while greatly improving the evaluation efficiency. Leveraging VLM-based labeling further unlocks opportunities to expand the query set, optimize sampling design, and efficiently assess a wider range of search experiences at scale. This approach leads to higher-quality relevance metrics and significantly reduces the Minimum Detectable Effects (MDEs) in online experiment measurements.

Deep search agents answer difficult information-seeking questions by iteratively issuing search queries to gather supporting evidence, but it remains unclear whether and how greater search effort leads to better answers. We study these questions through a trajectory-level diagnosis of long-horizon search agents. Using human-annotated document-level relevance judgments, we evaluate the evidence retrieved at each search step and separate two stages of agent behavior: what evidence an agent retrieves and how effectively it uses that evidence. This distinction further allows us to decompose failures into retrieval gaps, where the necessary evidence is never found, and utilization gaps, where relevant evidence is retrieved but not used correctly. With the retrieval model and evaluation harness held fixed, we compare six agents on BrowseComp-Plus and further validate our findings on BrowseComp with an open-web search API. Across settings, we find that search effort and answer quality are only weakly aligned. Answer accuracy is better correlated with the quality of retrieved evidence, especially cumulative retrieval recall, than with the number of searches or the amount of context consumed. Useful evidence often appears early in the trajectory, yet agents tend to continue searching, producing a long tail of low-yield retrieval steps. At the query level, exploratory reformulations remain useful, but the best-performing agents issue far fewer redundant queries. Overall, by systematically characterizing the search behavior and failure modes of long-horizon search agents, this work points to practical directions for building better deep research systems, including stronger query formulation, more effective evidence selection and context management, and stopping criteria based on whether sufficient supporting evidence has been retrieved.

Long-video question answering requires identifying sparse yet critical evidence from videos containing thousands of frames under a constrained visual-token budget. Existing methods either select query-aware frames in a single pass or rely on timestamped text solely as retrieval guidance, leading to two key limitations. First, selected frames tend to cluster around local relevance peaks, and once the budget is exhausted, omitted evidence cannot be recovered. Second, textual and visual evidence remain weakly aligned. We propose GCR, a training-free framework that casts fixed-budget frame selection as a joint evidence curation problem. Ground converts timestamped text into temporal events, selects query-relevant real frame anchors, and renders each event text onto its temporally aligned frame. Cover supplements grounded events with direct visual anchors for complementary visual evidence and applies global maximal marginal relevance to preserve diverse context. Refine revisits omitted temporal regions and replaces the weakest revisable context frame with a real-frame medoid---but only when the medoid offers greater evidence value. GCR maintains a fixed number of chronologically ordered frames and requires no VLM training or architectural modification. Experiments on LongVideoBench and Video-MME, across three 7B backbones and frame budgets of 8, 32, and 64, demonstrate consistent improvements in long-video QA. With the 7B LLaVA-OV backbone and 32 frames, GCR achieves 64.25% and 62.15% on the two benchmarks, outperforming the strongest reproduced baselines by 2.54 and 1.93 percentage points, respectively.

Content discovery systems depend on relevance judgment for search quality evaluation, but human annotation faces inter-annotator disagreement and scaling costs. While Large Language Models show promise as automated assessors, current approaches rely on flat aggregation strategies: single-step prompting, voting ensembles, or uncoordinated multi-agent pipelines that aggregate independent outputs without integration. We propose HIERA, a hierarchical multi-agent relevance assessment framework with four specialized agents: a Relevance Judge, Query Analyzer, Item Analyzer, and Relation Analyzer. The Judge determines when specialist analysis is needed; the Relation Analyzer then coordinates query and item analyses with external knowledge to establish relevance relationships for final judgment. Ablation studies show that the same agents and external knowledge without hierarchical coordination degrade performance, confirming that the coordination structure itself accounts for the improvement. Evaluation across five datasets (EVS, MSRD, ESCI, WANDS, Home Depot) shows improvements over 11 baselines: 10.2% on Home Depot, 4.8% on ESCI, and up to 38% on EVS ($p < 0.05$). Hierarchical coordination yields 12.7% improvement over uncoordinated collaboration using identical agents.

Recent advances in large vision-language models (LVLMs) have enabled long-video understanding and analysis. However, processing the large number of frames in a video incurs substantial computational overhead. Existing methods reduce LVLM inference costs by scoring frame-query relevance before inference and selecting keyframes accordingly. Nevertheless, the distribution of relevant frames varies across queries, and these methods often need to score hundreds or thousands of frames. To address this limitation, we propose CSES, a training-free semantic keyframe selector that adaptively determines the numbers of frames to score and keyframes to select. CSES estimates the prominence of the frame-query relevance profile to guide active acquisition and adapt the temporal coverage of each input. It then formulates keyframe selection as a coverage problem that jointly accounts for semantic relevance, temporal redundancy, and visual redundancy. Active acquisition and keyframe selection terminate based on coverage saturation. The selection objective is monotone and submodular, enabling greedy optimization with a standard approximation guarantee. Experiments with four LVLMs on two benchmarks show that our method preserves accuracy while scoring $4$-$13\times$ fewer frames and selecting $18.4\%$-$20.5\%$ fewer input keyframes than existing baselines. CSES further achieves a $3.1$-$5.4\times$ speedup in frame selection over baselines.

Schema linking is a critical component of Text-to-SQL systems, but existing approaches often trade off contextual modeling capacity, score-based controllability, and inference efficiency. We introduce AttnLink, an attention-based framework that converts LLMs' internal attention into continuous relevance scores for schema items. AttnLink extracts the attention from the generation-start position to candidate schema spans, enabling all candidates to be ranked in a single prefill pass without autoregressive decoding. We develop two variants: AttnLink-U, which directly probes pretrained attention without parameter updates, and AttnLink-S, which aligns the attention distribution with gold schema items through direct supervision. To improve coverage of multiple relevant schema items, AttnLink-S combines a set-mass objective with an adaptive probability-floor regularizer. The resulting scores support post-hoc precision-recall control through temperature scaling and cumulative-mass selection. Experiments on Spider, BIRD, and Spider2-SQLite show that AttnLink-S achieves mAP scores of 99.22%, 95.95%, and 83.29%, respectively, with millisecond-scale schema-linking latency. It also yields the best or tied-best execution accuracy for downstream SQL generation in seven of nine generator-dataset settings.

As search increasingly shifts toward LLM-driven answer engines, advertising is becoming embedded within the generated response itself and should therefore be evaluated for both user utility and commercial value. The key challenge is click-through intent: behavioural logs are unavailable, human annotation resists calibration, and frontier LLM judges conflate intent with linguistic fluency. These gaps compound, as principled pricing presupposes a continuous intent signal, while generating such a signal presupposes supervision that is currently unavailable. We construct the missing supervision through a psychologically grounded agent simulation framework, and distil it into a parameter-efficient evaluator that predicts click-through intent, together with the three companion dimensions of ad quality, as smooth, differentiable estimates. Validated through sign-certain behavioural perturbations, the evaluator surpasses frontier zero-shot judges on relevance sensitivity (79% versus 60-67%), tracks graded content degradation, generalises without error to 103 fictional products, and agrees with human preference in 86% of pairwise judgements across five annotators, with agreement rising in the evaluator's confidence. Upon its estimates we build the pricing layer directly, deriving the unique payment rule under which truthful bidding is optimal, demonstrating it on a best-of-k allocation, and extending the mechanism to non-monotone allocations. The same differentiable signal stands ready as a training objective for ad generation.

Relevance is a query-dependent estimate of whether a document or excerpt contains useful evidence. Existing retrieval agents use relevance to select top-$k$ content, but document relevance alone cannot localize, compose, or verify the evidence required by complex questions. Direct Corpus Interaction (DCI) enables such fine-grained operations through grep-style exploration, but its relevance-agnostic search can expose useful clues late and delay convergence. Recent advances use relevance to narrow the corpus into a working space for interaction. Once interaction begins, however, relevance still does not directly guide which documents grep searches first or distinguish informative excerpts from a broad set of matches to let LLMs see them first. We introduce the Relevance-Aware RipGrep Search Agent (RARG), which turns relevance into an execution prior for corpus interaction. RARG provides coarse-to-fine relevance guidance: it orders documents for sequential 'ripgrep' traversal to expose globally relevant clues earlier, initializes promising entry points with query-relevant paragraphs, and reranks grep matches to surface informative excerpts that document-level ranking may otherwise obscure. Across challenging browse question answering and reasoning-intensive retrieval, RARG improves the accuracy--efficiency frontier over retrieval-based and direct-interaction agents. These results demonstrate that relevance-aware interaction enables faster and more reliable search convergence.

Existing token compression methods for omnimodal large language models typically rely on one modality to determine what to retain in the other. We show that this assumption often breaks down: for the same query, audio and video relevance often peaks at different moments. This cross-modal salience mismatch makes unidirectional guidance prone to discarding answer-critical cues under aggressive compression. We propose OmniScope, a training-free token compression framework that uses the query as a shared semantic anchor while estimating relevance separately for audio and video. OmniScope allocates modality-specific token budgets, prunes visual tokens with an anchor-delta strategy that preserves both global context and temporal changes, and merges audio tokens within each second to reduce redundancy while maintaining temporal continuity. Across four audio-video benchmarks and two Qwen2.5-Omni model scales, OmniScope achieves the best average accuracy across all compression settings. At 25% overall token retention, it delivers up to 3.53x prefill speedup and more than 15% GPU memory reduction, with only a 0.35-point drop in average accuracy. These results suggest a simple design principle for OmniLLM inference: share the query across modalities, but not the salience estimates. The code is available at https://github.com/MAC-AutoML/OmniScope.

Semantic-ID-based generative recommendation represents items as sequences of shared semantic tokens, enabling token recombination beyond isolated item IDs. However, closed-world recombination does not necessarily imply temporal open-token cold-start induction, where new items enter the item catalog with unseen atomic tokens or weakly supported SID paths. In this work, we revisit SID-based generative recommendation under an absolute-time temporal protocol that separates seen and unseen targets and diagnoses the cold item reachability at the token level. Through seen/unseen-hit analysis, coldness taxonomy, and oracle-prefix probing, we show that current SID-based models can occasionally reach future items supported by observed tokens and prefixes, but struggle with unseen atomic tokens and unsupported SID paths. We further explain this boundary by interpreting SID generation as hierarchical semantic bucketing: early tokens select coarse semantic regions, while later tokens refine item-specific paths. These findings show that SID generation is compositional but not fully open-ended, and suggest future directions in more independent SID spaces, scoring-based interfaces, and dynamic textual context.

Imbalanced regression problems arise when the target variable has an asymmetric distribution, resulting in underrepresented value ranges in the dataset. Traditional approaches for identifying rare instances rely on a relevance function that assigns higher importance to specific regions of the target distribution. However, the effectiveness of imbalance-aware learning methods depends strongly on how relevance is defined. In more complex scenarios, such as bimodal distributions, traditional relevance functions struggle to capture rarity, as they assign fixed relevance values based solely on target values, thereby compromising the distinction between truly rare and normal instances. To address these limitations, this study proposes an Instance Hardness-based relevance function (InHaR) for identifying rare instances in regression problems. Unlike traditional relevance functions, the proposed approach incorporates learning difficulty, allowing rarity to be inferred not only from the target distribution but also from the difficulty of instances for the learning algorithm. This property is particularly important in bimodal scenarios, where rarity cannot be accurately inferred from target values alone. Experimental results demonstrate that the InHaR correctly identifies rare regions under bimodal distributions and, when used to guide resampling strategies such as Random Oversampling (RO) and Gaussian Noise (GN), leads to significant improvements in predictive performance compared to traditional relevance-based approaches. The code, dataset, and further details about the proposed method are publicly available at https://github.com/VitorLeitao/instance-hardness-Imbalanced-regression.

As large language models and AI agents become the primary consumers of search results, document set quality determines the upper bound of downstream generation. Yet existing evaluation systems remain confined to scoring documents independently and aggregating via nDCG, ignoring inter-document interactions (redundancy, conflict, complementarity) and unable to answer what makes one document set better than another. To address these issues, we propose a complete evaluate-diagnose-optimize framework. We design SetwiseEvalKit, a three-level, nine-dimension document set evaluation benchmark covering both short-form and long-form scenarios, comprising approximately 28K high-quality evaluation rubrics. We systematically evaluate 12 rerankers: even the best method achieves no more than 45% coverage, cross-document coordination dimensions are universally weak, and no single method maintains top performance across both settings. Building on this, we propose Rubric4Setwise, a training-free method that converts rubric-based evaluation criteria into document set selection signals, achieving the best downstream generation performance with fewer documents and search rounds. It is the only method that maintains state-of-the-art results across both scenarios, validating the effectiveness of closing the loop from evaluation to optimization.

As large language model agents gain access to increasingly large skill libraries, retrieving the right skill becomes critical to reliable capability selection and execution. Existing retrievers often treat skill contents as ordinary documents, overlooking their highly regular structure: shared descriptive patterns recur across many skills while providing little evidence for distinguishing the required capability. We show that this shared descriptive background is reflected in dense relevance scores, induces a pronounced energy gap between queries and skill documents, and obscures discriminative signals, especially for structurally similar hard negatives. Based on this observation, we propose SkillSight, a training-free retrieval framework that calibrates shared background in both semantic and lexical spaces. Semantic Background Calibration estimates a background subspace from generic tokens identified by IDF, reducing similarity induced by shared descriptive patterns, while Lexical Evidence Calibration downweights shared background tokens to recover discriminative token-level evidence. Experiments on SRA-Bench and SkillBench-Supp demonstrate consistent improvements across retrieval metrics, with SkillSight improving Recall@10 by up to 20.21 percentage points over the original dense retriever. It is up to 1,248 times faster than the Dense + Reranker baseline. In end-to-end evaluation, SkillSight achieves the best overall performance across three agent models and outperforms LLM Selection by up to 4.97 percentage points. These results identify shared descriptive background as a source of ranking interference in skill retrieval and demonstrate that calibrating it enables accurate and efficient skill selection without additional training. Our code can be found at https://github.com/xiaojinying/SkillSight

Multi-vector dense retrieval models, such as ColBERT, achieve strong retrieval effectiveness by modelling fine-grained token-level interactions between queries and documents. Methods such as PLAID use centroid-based quantisation of each token's vector to reduce the index size and speed up retrieval while maintaining strong effectiveness. In this work, we introduce PLAID-PRF, a method that performs Pseudo-Relevance Feedback (PRF) over PLAID to reformulate ColBERT's query vectors based on the top-retrieved results. In contrast with prior methods that perform PRF on multi-vector retrieval models, PLAID-PRF keeps computational costs low by leveraging the internal PLAID centroid vectors, treating them similarly to tokens in traditional PRF methods. The method selects a small and diverse set of high-utility expansion vectors and appends them to the original query, rerunning PLAID to refine both candidate generation and final scoring. Extensive experiments on the standard in-domain MSMARCO and four out-of-domain BEIR benchmarks show that PLAID-PRF consistently improves retrieval effectiveness over various baselines. In particular, PLAID-PRF improves over PLAID by up to 4.3% nDCG@10 and 7.3% MRR@10, while introducing substantially less computation overhead than prior PRF methods. The results demonstrate that our proposed centroid-aware PRF method offers an effective and lightweight mechanism to improve the quality of top-ranked retrieved results. Overall, this work enables effective and efficient feedback-aware late-interaction retrieval without expensive query-time document-token clustering.

Prior case retrieval (PCR) aims to identify the precedent cases relevant to the facts of a query case. Incoming citation context, the text with which later cases characterize a case when citing it, is a powerful relevance signal, yet it is typically evaluated without a temporal constraint, so the retriever is credited with citations made after the query. We introduce a temporally fenced retriever with no learned parameters that augments BM25 with incoming citation context restricted to citations predating the query, together with a temporal-admission decomposition that quantifies the phantom fraction: the share of a citation-context gain attributable to citations not known to predate the query. Experiments span two jurisdictions, U.S. federal (CLERC) and European (ECtHR-PCR) case law. On ECtHR-PCR, without any training, the fenced retriever outperforms a strong degree-controlled baseline across the full recall ladder, and a temporal-admission decomposition attributes 14.9% (validation) of an unfenced citation-context gain over BM25 to citations not known to predate the query. Citation-context retrieval must therefore be temporally fenced and degree-controlled before its reported gains can be interpreted.

With a large controlled vocabulary as the label set, the task of automated subject indexing in a library can be understood as a multi-label classification task. If the set of subject terms is large, the problem fits the Extreme Multi-Label Classification (XMLC) objective. In this study, we apply a selection of specialised supervised XMLC methods to the test case of subject indexing contemporary German scientific literature, collected at the German National Library (DNB). We contrast these results by including a classical lexical matching baseline and three of our own recently developed LLM-based methods into the benchmark. Algorithms are evaluated and compared in several metrics. This includes binary relevance comparisons with previously indexed material, as well as graded relevance ratings by professional subject librarians. A challenge for all methods is to reliably make suggestions from the long tail of the subject vocabulary. We find that supervised XMLC algorithms relying on transformer-based dense features give best results in terms of overall binary relevance metrics. However, focusing on graded relevance and performance in the long tail of our subject vocabulary, the LLM-based generative methods give better results, making them a promising alternative for future productive use.

Perturbation-based xAI methods are widely used to analyze the behavior and predictions of deep learning models. By altering input regions and measuring the resulting changes in class probabilities with respect to the original image, they assign relevance scores and generate heatmaps that reflect each region's contribution to the prediction. Despite their apparent simplicity, however, perturbation-based methods are sensitive to parameter choices. In this work, we focus on two key parameters of the perturbation pipeline, namely the patch geometry, including the size and shape of the perturbed regions, and the perturbation type, defined by the replacement scheme. Grounded in the use case of flood detection from Synthetic Aperture Radar imagery, we conduct a comprehensive investigation of how relevance estimation changes under different perturbation settings. Beyond visual inspection of the resulting relevance maps, we evaluate their consistency across perturbation strategies and their faithfulness to the model's reasoning. We demonstrate how different perturbation choices can steer the resulting relevance maps, yielding ambiguous and even contradictory explanations. Our findings emphasize the importance of methodological settings in perturbation-based xAI. They underscore the need to carefully inspect and evaluate perturbation choices and to treat them as an integral part when interpreting explanations, ensuring a robust understanding of both the explanations and model predictions.

Vision Transformer (ViT) has been widely used as a powerful framework for modeling global dependencies among image patches. However, its core component, self-attention assigns softmax-normalized relative weights to all patches, making it difficult to evaluate the relevance between patches independently. In visual recognition, images often contain many background or redundant patches, yet self-attention cannot explicitly reject such irrelevant patches, which may introduce unnecessary information into feature aggregation. To address this limitation, Screening has been proposed in the field of language modeling, where the relevance of each token is independently evaluated based on query-key similarity and low-relevance tokens are explicitly excluded through thresholding. In this work, we propose VisionScreen, a new vision model that extends Screening mechanism to visual recognition. VisionScreen treats image patches as tokens arranged on a two-dimensional grid and extends absolute relevance estimation based on query-key similarity to the two-dimensional spatial domain. This allows each patch to selectively aggregate only content-wise and spatially relevant patches without relying on competition among patches. Experiments on image classification benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms conventional ViT. These results suggest that Screening can be effective for visual recognition, offering an alternative to relative feature aggregation based on softmax attention.

Decision trees generate interpretable if--then rules, yet they contain irrelevant conditions (IRCs). These IRCs arise from the structural mechanism of tree splitting and persist even in modern optimal sparse tree induction algorithms. Existing IRC deletion methods overlook this structural mechanism; therefore, they either preserve the original tree too loosely to remain reliable, or too strictly to achieve meaningful simplification. This study provides theoretical foundations for reliable IRC deletion by establishing theorems and propositions related to the underlying IRC mechanism. The key finding is that a binary split shifts class proportions in opposite directions relative to the parent. Specifically, an increase in the class-1 proportion along one branch necessitates an increase in the class-0 proportion along its sibling, thereby generating a C1-link and a C0-link. Based on this structural fact, we propose a structural IRC deletion framework. Relative to each leaf, links that increase the leaf-class proportion are matched, whereas links that increase the proportion of the opposite leaf-class are mismatched. These mismatched links are flagged as structurally suspicious IRC candidates. Rather than deleting them outright, the framework rigorously diagnoses their relevance by assessing prediction reliability. It selectively deletes conditions that are structurally and empirically irrelevant, while strictly protecting those whose deletion would reduce the rule's reliability. Experimental results confirm that the proposed framework achieves substantial rule simplification without sacrificing the reliability of the original tree.

Vision Transformers (ViTs) are difficult to interpret because current methods of relevance propagation and attention flow do not fully consider some key architectural features, such as the uneven importance of attention heads and residual connections. Prior approaches typically assume uniform importance across attention heads; furthermore, they model skip connections as identity paths, leading to inaccurate relevance attribution. To address these issues, we introduce GradSkip, a novel relevance propagation method for ViTs based on adaptive head weighting and skip-aware propagation. GradSkip models the different importance of the attention heads and dynamically distributes relevance between the attention and residual paths. Experiments on ImageNet1K and BloodMNIST demonstrate a state-of-the-art faithfulness of GradSkip while requiring over 14 times fewer GFLOPs than the best-performing existing approaches. Additional evaluations using transformer-based segmentation confirm improved localization and alignment with ground-truth regions.

This paper reports an empirical study evaluating the relevance of several RAG metrics. The experiment is based on a question-answering dataset created by human annotators from business data. The generated responses and retrieved spans of a RAG system are scored using evaluation metrics from four libraries (Ragas, DeepEval, RAGChecker, Opik). These metrics are compared to scores given by two evaluators, as well as to standard metrics such as recall. An analysis of correlations is conducted. Finally, we highlight certain limitations of our methodology, compare it to those used in the literature, and suggest some avenues for future research. This paper is an English translation of a paper originally published in the French-speaking workshop EvalLLM (Brabant, 2026).

Evaluating uncertainty in AI-generated SQL queries requires estimating whether a query is correct, where correct means it executes to the same result as a human-written reference. We study which signals predict correctness on hard multi-table text-to-SQL, using AUROC to measure how well each ranks correct queries above incorrect ones. On BIRD and Spider, black-box signals such as string, structural, and execution self-consistency, a schema-relevance score, and query executability all fall between about 0.61 and 0.68 AUROC, with string self-consistency strongest at 0.675; white-box log-probability is similar (0.67). The signals that move past this ceiling are verification-based: an LLM judge scores from 0.72 (GPT-4o-mini) to 0.78 (Claude). Judges from different providers make different errors, so a two-provider ensemble reaches 0.82 AUROC with a well-calibrated probability (expected calibration error 0.03) and supports useful abstention frontiers (for example, answering 27% of questions at 24% selective risk) where self-consistency offers no valid low-risk subset. The pattern holds across two benchmarks, two generators, and two judge providers. We also ask whether a verifier can be trained. Fine-tuned verifiers, both encoder and generative, reach about 0.77 to 0.79 AUROC in-distribution but fall to about 0.66 on unseen schemas; scaling to 7B, adding schema diversity, distilling a strong judge's rationales, and cross-benchmark training all fail to close that gap. Cross-schema transfer appears to track model scale and reasoning rather than fine-tuning. In practice, correctness uncertainty for text-to-SQL lives in reasoning-based signals: a fine-tuned verifier is a good in-domain tool, but a verifier that generalizes across schemas currently means a large frozen reasoning model.

Multi-hop Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs faces a critical challenge: traditional retrieve-then-read pipelines break differentiability, preventing the retriever from learning to bridge the semantic gap where intermediate nodes lack lexical overlap with the query. To address this, we propose RSF-GLLM, a framework decoupling differentiable graph reasoning from answer generation. Our Recurrent Soft-Flow (RSF) module employs a GRU-guided query updater to propagate continuous relevance scores, utilizing a dynamic gating mechanism to traverse semantically dissimilar bridge nodes via structural cues. We introduce flow sparsity regularization to theoretically guarantee convergence from soft probabilities to discrete reasoning paths. These paths are extracted and textualized to fine-tune a Large Language Model (LLM), ensuring generation is grounded in factual topology. Experiments on WebQSP and CWQ demonstrate that RSF-GLLM achieves competitive performance with superior inference efficiency compared to LLM based computationally expensive approaches.

Sponsored search plays a crucial role as a revenue stream for search engines, wherein advertisers competitively bid on keywords that align with the users' search queries. The task of matching relevant keywords to these queries is complicated by the vast and ever-evolving space of keywords, the ambiguity of user and advertiser intentions, and the wide range of topics and languages involved. Consequently, ensuring that ads are pertinent to user queries presents significant challenges. In the fast-paced world of e-commerce, the accuracy of sponsored search results is vital for boosting user satisfaction and optimizing business operations. This paper presents the development of an advanced Ad Relevance Model within a sponsored search framework, utilizing the power of a pretrained large language model. We detail a pioneering adaptation of the LLAMA2 7B model through Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), which markedly enhances search precision and operational efficiency, thus opening new avenues for improving user interactions in extensive online marketplaces such as Walmart.com. We introduce a novel query and ad title classifier, which discerns the relevance of search interactions across three categories: Relevant, Partially Relevant, and Irrelevant. Our approach involved adapting the pretrained model specifically for the e-commerce sponsored search context, training it on a large dataset. The fine-tuned model demonstrated a marked improvement in ad relevance accuracy, achieving 89.43% accuracy on a comprehensive test dataset -- outperforming both the baseline model and other advanced language models like GPT-4. The integration of LoRA with the based model represents a significant stride in customizing language models for e-commerce applications, resulting in enhanced search accuracy, cost efficiency, and operational privacy -- a triad essential for the modern digital marketplace.

In many machine learning applications, the most relevant items for a query should be efficiently retrieved. The relevance function is usually an expensive similarity model, making the exhaustive search infeasible. A typical solution is to train another model that separately embeds queries and items to a vector space, where similarity is defined via the dot product or cosine similarity. This allows one to search the relevant items through fast approximate nearest neighbor search at the cost of some reduction in quality. To compensate for this reduction, the found items (candidates) are re-ranked by the expensive ranking model. In this paper, we investigate an alternative approach to candidate selection that utilizes the scores of the expensive model to improve the representations of queries and items. The idea is to describe each query (item) by its relevance to a set of support items (queries) and use these new representations to obtain query (item) embeddings. We theoretically prove that such embeddings are powerful enough to approximate any complex similarity model (under mild conditions). We also investigate the choice of support items, which is a crucial ingredient of the proposed approach. The experiments on diverse academic and production datasets illustrate the power of our method.

Visual token pruning is a crucial strategy for accelerating VLMs by compressing redundant image patches, yet existing methods often fail to preserve critical cues under dense instructions and fine-grained queries. In this paper, we investigate this failure and identify two underlying bottlenecks: the widespread dispersion of textual noise that corrupts dense cross-modal scoring, and the feature fragmentation inherent to standard token selection. To address these issues, we propose Entropy-Aware Dense Pruning (EADP), a framework that reformulates pruning as a structured compression problem. EADP first leverages statistical entropy to quantify and filter out textual noise, yielding a robust, fine-grained instruction relevance score. Subsequently, instead of naive Top-K selection, EADP casts token selection as a submodular maximization problem with a spatial prior, explicitly ensuring a holistic and non-redundant visual representation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EADP improves the accuracy-efficiency trade-off of VLMs, robustly preserving fine-grained visual cues under strict token budgets while achieving SoTA performance on challenging multimodal benchmarks.

We propose a model agnostic methodology to measure lag relevance in machine learning forecasting models applied to univariate time series. Particularly, we are working in the context of time series using the frameworks of Ghost variables and Shapley values, together with additive importance measures, to introduce the auto-relevance and partial auto-relevance functions as the lag importance values. Additionally, we propose a novel method to replace absent features in coalition based methods with a one step forecast from the same model. We evaluate these proposals under different simulations and real data cases. This combined framework perspective is particularly suitable for time series. In addition, to show our discoveries we use a pull of models from the seasonal ARMA family and recurrent neural networks. We found that the calculated relevance measures successfully demonstrate the expected lag structure in almost all cases.

Trial-to-trial variability limits how reliably neural population geometry can be estimated, while comparisons across populations depend on neuron and trial counts, response quality, and clustered sampling. We quantified within-session geometric reliability using Shesha, the Spearman correlation between representational dissimilarity matrices estimated from independent trial subsets, in all 39 Steinmetz Neuropixels sessions and in olfactory bulb and piriform cortex recordings from Bolding and Franks. Steinmetz analyses matched neurons and repetitions, compared observed reliability with a stationary residual-bootstrap expectation, and used mouse-level or mouse-clustered inference. Mean matched reliability was 0.0402 across 312 area-by-session recordings. Regional differences and reliability above the stationary benchmark did not survive correction. Temporal effects received the strongest support: interleaving early and late trials increased reliability relative to blocked allocation ($Δ=0.02666$, $q=0.001953$), and RDM similarity declined with within-session lag (mean mouse-level slope $=-0.01912$, $q=0.001953$; $n=10$ mice). Outer-cross-fitted reliability was not associated with choice-direction coupling or stimulus or response-direction decoding after correction. Olfactory comparisons remained descriptive because few paired sessions and no animal identities were available. In held-out simulations, associative recurrence outperformed feedforward subspace denoising but not divisive normalization. Representational geometry became less reproducible with temporal separation within a session, and comparisons across neural populations require sampling calibration and independent inference.

A central challenge in statistical modeling is identifying the subset of features that belong in the true regression model. The classical best subset selection problem, recently made tractable via mixed-integer optimization (MIO), finds the globally optimal sparse solution. It does not, however, make use of any information beyond the observed data. In many applied settings, domain experts can meaningfully rank or score the relevance of candidate predictors, yet no existing framework integrates such probabilistic expert assessments directly into the best-subsets objective. This paper presents Expert-Implied Bayesian Best Subsets (EBBS), a method that incorporates domain-expert probability estimates of feature relevance into the MIO best-subsets problem through a maximum a posteriori (MAP) framework. Expert views from multiple respondents are aggregated into a single prior probability per feature using the Poisson binomial distribution for marginal probability estimates, the pairwise win rate for pairwise comparisons, or the normalized mean rank for ordinal rankings. This probability enters the objective function as a log-odds penalty term that smoothly encourages or discourages the selection of each feature consistent with the expert consensus. This paper provides analytic derivations of the MAP formulation and characterizes its theoretical properties. The proposed model reduces to Best Subsets when experts all have no views. Empirical results on synthetic and real datasets are forthcoming.

Medical question-answering benchmarks rarely cover the maternal, neonatal, child, and reproductive-health questions a nurse-midwife asks, and, to our knowledge, no public chunk-level relevance benchmark exists for maternal-health guideline retrieval. We release two benchmarks that fill these gaps. mamabench is a scope-filtered QA set of 25,949 items assembled from seven existing expert-authored sources across multiple-choice, short-answer, and rubric-graded tracks; to help users calibrate the LLM judge that scores the rubric track, we re-scope HealthBench's physician-labelled meta-evaluation to the domain. mamaretrieval pairs 3,185 clinical queries with graded (0-6) relevance labels over a 63,650-chunk maternal-health guideline corpus, using a decomposed rubric that distinguishes a chunk that answers a query from one merely on its topic. Three decisions shape both: assemble and filter expert sources rather than author questions, grade relevance rather than binarise it, and measure and disclose the limits of the labels -- scope-classifier agreement, a frontier-judge check, and a pooling-completeness audit -- rather than treat them as an oracle. A companion paper uses the benchmarks to evaluate a deployed on-device assistant; both are released openly for research.