Discriminative

Deceptive online job advertisements have emerged as a primary pathway into forced labour, yet systematic detection methods remain underdeveloped due to data scarcity and absence of empirically validated indicators. We formalise this detection challenge as a classification problem under signalling theory, where exploiters transmit costless signals mimicking legitimate communications across textual, visual, and structural dimensions. Using 464 verified cases (164 deceptive, 300 legitimate) collected through anti-slavery charities across nine origin countries and 21 industries, we develop multimodal detection models combining computer vision, natural language processing, and semantic embeddings. Through systematic feature ablation experiments and repeated stratified cross-validation, we demonstrate that individual modalities achieve substantial discriminatory power (ROC-AUC: 0.87--0.97), whilst their integration yields modest further gains. SHAP-based analysis reveals that text quality and domain-specific risk language are the primary discriminators, with readability indices, risk keyword density, and visa sponsorship mentions ranking highest, followed by visual colour and texture features. These production quality gaps reflect resource constraints that prevent exploiters from maintaining professional standards across all communication channels simultaneously. We operationalise findings through a proof-of-concept decision support system providing interpretable risk scores for practitioners. This work demonstrates how rigorous analytical frameworks can address complex humanitarian operations challenges characterised by information asymmetry and limited ground-truth data.

Existing fairness analysis tools predominantly operate as post-training evaluation frameworks, requiring practitioners to complete the full model development lifecycle before assessing bias. We present FairLint-DL, a Visual Studio Code extension that implements a shift-left approach to fairness testing by enabling pre-training, IDE-native bias detection directly on tabular datasets. FairLint-DL trains a configurable deep neural network as a proxy model and applies information-theoretic Quantitative Individual Discrimination (QID) metrics. Grounded in Shannon and min-entropy, QID quantifies the causal influence of protected attributes on predictions. The system implements a two-phase gradient-guided search algorithm for discovering discriminatory instances, a causal debugging pipeline that localizes bias to specific network layers and neurons via sensitivity analysis, and dual explainability engines using SHAP and LIME for feature-level attribution. Evaluation on three tabular benchmarks (Adult Census Income, German Credit, and Bank Marketing) reveals fairness concerns that vary widely across datasets: on Adult, 96.0% of analyzed instances exhibit QID above the 0.1-bit significance threshold, with a mean QID of 0.619 bits and a disparate impact ratio of 0.581, violating the four-fifths legal rule. FairLint-DL produces these results within 12 seconds on cached models, demonstrating the feasibility of integrating fairness analysis into the developer workflow without significant overhead.

Unpaired cross-modal distillation transfers grade structure from histopathology into a micro-ultrasound (micro-US) encoder by aligning a pooled needle-region embedding to a frozen histopathology teacher under grade-group correspondence alone. A single objective is thereby required to serve two distinct functions: rendering patch features discriminative of tissue state, and selecting which patches enter the pooled representation. We decouple them. Weak spatial supervision derived from percentage involvement, recorded routinely at biopsy, constrains the predicted proportion of malignant tissue within each core, acting on the encoder features independently of the alignment objective. The alignment loss then operates on features that differ across a core, and attention concentrates on a subset of patches rather than remaining near-uniform. On 7,166 biopsy cores from 811 patients across seven centers under patient-level 5-fold cross-validation, the method reaches 67.1 macro AUC and 68.5 csPCa AUC, against 61.2 and 52.8 for the existing unpaired alignment method and 63.1 and 62.6 for the strongest unimodal baselines. Ablation against existing attention regularizers designed to prevent attention-uniformity collapse shows that such regularizers do not substitute for label-derived supervision: they constrain the attention distribution, whereas the signal required acts on the features that attention reads.

Statistical data fusion combines two panels that share a block of covariates but observe disjoint outcome blocks, and in its traditional form no row observes both outcomes at once. That rules out the discriminative criterion one would rather train a Deep Boltzmann Machine with, since multi-prediction training needs ground truth for whatever it holds out. We propose observed-block multi-prediction, which restricts the multi-prediction objective to targets drawn from what each row actually observes. It is well defined for any missingness pattern and reduces to the original criterion when rows are complete. Having a discriminative criterion that survives the setting lets us ask whether the joint model is needed at all, by separating what it contributes into a representation part and an inference part. On two datasets of different kinds, a consumer purchase panel and public-domain census microdata, over grids in sample size and covariate width spanning 40 cells and 200 runs per method, almost none of the fine-tuned DBM's advantage comes from generative pre-training, which is confined to the smallest sample size on one dataset and absent on the other. It comes from conditioning on one outcome block when predicting the other. This term amounts to +0.19 and +0.36 percentage points, is positive in all 40 cells, never decays as the panels grow (it is flat on one dataset and grows on the other), and requires neither a second hidden layer nor more inference. Against baselines tuned on validation and given the same conditioning, the fine-tuned DBM is the best method in 37 of the 40 cells. The imputers that can also condition on the other outcome block mostly lose accuracy when they do, whereas the DBM gains in every cell; since fusion data cannot validate that choice, this is the property that matters.

Self-supervised speech foundation models are now used in a wide array of downstream applications, including traditional speech recognition and as the basis for tokens in speech-aware language models. Attempts to understand their usefulness have largely focused on probing their representations' ability to discriminate phonemes and words. However, discriminative ability for words need not imply specialized representation of words per se. Good discrimination of words may be explained by good encoding of word form (phonemes) rather than form-independent word representations encoding identity or syntactic/semantic properties. By partialling out phoneme information using residualization, we show that, in later layers, HuBERT and wav2vec 2.0 do in general learn representations which encode words with reasonable fidelity independently of local phonetic content. We show that this simple approach to disentanglement can enhance higher-order linguistic information in word discovery tasks.

In this paper, we propose a class-wise dimension (channel) selection framework for Multivariate Time Series Classification (MTSC). Rather than applying a single global dimension selection process, the proposed approach independently identifies informative dimensions for each class. A dedicated learning process is subsequently performed for each class, followed by a fusion stage for final prediction. The objective is to improve the generation of discriminative feature representations while reducing the influence of noisy or non-informative dimensions. The proposed framework is evaluated using MiniRocket, a random kernel-based baseline method. Experimental results indicate that class-wise dimension selection improves the quality of extracted representations and can enhance classification performance, particularly in high-dimensional settings. These findings suggest that incorporating class-specific information into the training process represents a promising direction for MTSC, improving robustness through consistent gains across heterogeneous datasets, and interpretability through the explicit identification of class-relevant dimensions.

Large vision-language models used as listwise rerankers must jointly process visual tokens from tens of candidates per query, making token pruning essential for practical deployment. Existing pruning methods retain tokens by attention saliency, yet we show that saliency is systematically misaligned with ranking contribution: visually prominent tokens often capture order-neutral patterns shared across candidates. This mismatch is layer-dependent: saliency becomes informative only where attention is concentrated, and normalized attention entropy diagnoses the reliability shift (Pearson r=0.87). We propose RaDiCal (Rank-Discriminative Calibration), a training-free framework that uses normalized attention entropy to decide when saliency can be trusted, fusing it with an attention-free rank-discriminative prior and selecting pruning layers from the same trust landscape. Across three retrieval benchmarks and multiple VLM architectures, RaDiCal matches Dense MRR@10 on Flickr30K and surpasses it on MSCOCO at a 20% token budget, ranks first among all pruning methods on FashionIQ, and holds within 1.2 pp on Flickr30K and MSCOCO at 10% retention. It cuts FLOPs by 39--45% and delivers 1.28--1.45$\times$ measured speedups across two VLM architectures without dataset-specific retuning.

General-purpose NLP embedding models perform well on linguistic tasks, but their ability to capture symbolic ontological structure remains unclear. We introduce AVA, a systematic framework for evaluating whether embeddings distinguish logic-sensitive relational semantics in ontologies and knowledge graphs. AVA comprises 171,007 contrastive triplets derived from 163 heterogeneous ontologies using hierarchy inversion, relation substitution, and disjointness injection. Each triplet contains an ontology statement, a semantically equivalent paraphrase, and a logic-sensitive hard negative with contradictory relational meaning. We evaluate more than 25 state-of-the-art embedding models and find substantial limitations: the best model achieves only 0.739 triplet accuracy, while hard negative accuracy falls to 0.135. Fine-tuning improves discrimination by a large margin but transfers poorly to downstream Semantic Web tasks, including taxonomy discovery and ontology alignment. Further analysis suggests that improvements stem partly from perturbation-specific pattern recognition rather than robust ontological understanding. These findings reveal a persistent gap between linguistic representation learning and ontology-level discrimination, challenging the assumption that strong NLP benchmark performance translates to Semantic Web competence.

Geospatial foundation models have emerged as state-of-the-art methods for downstream Earth observation tasks. However, existing pretraining methodologies process imagery through a single-concept lens, failing to capture the highly compositional nature of complex satellite scenes. We propose a composition-aware pretraining framework that explicitly encodes fractional land-cover mixtures. Each satellite image cell is mapped to a histogram representing its fractional land-cover distribution, which we term the "composition target". These targets serve as the primary prediction objective and are distilled into the backbone using Earth Mover's Distance. Experimental evaluation shows that composition-aware pretraining yields substantial gains on region-level understanding tasks requiring semantic similarity judgment, including zero-shot image retrieval and scene classification, while remaining competitive on tasks requiring fine-grained spatial precision, such as segmentation and object detection. With a 36.8M-parameter backbone, our framework outperforms SatMAE and Prithvi-EO-2.0, which contain 303M and 600M parameters, respectively, in most retrieval and scene classification settings. On the fine-grained ForestNet-12 dataset, a rigorous testbed for compositional discrimination, our method boosts baseline mAP@10 from 0.279 to 0.434, a 55.6% relative improvement, providing direct evidence for the effectiveness of explicit composition modeling. The code implementation can be found at https://github.com/05kashyap/GFM_Composition_Pretraining

Collecting natural-language referring expressions along with region annotations, such as masks or boxes, is a major bottleneck in visual grounding (VG), as annotators must write descriptions that distinguish target regions from visually similar ones. We tackle this by formulating active learning (AL) for VG under the realistic setting where only raw images are available without accompanying text. Since ground-truth text is unavailable, sample selection must estimate which images contain ambiguous regions that would require discriminative referring expressions. To address this, we generate auxiliary region-text pairs using foundation models, and introduce Referred Region Ambiguity, a new acquisition function that measures whether the model's confidence collapses onto a single region or disperses across multiple candidates. It allows our method to prioritize images with strong cross-region competition, which are more informative due to their visual ambiguity. We also design a referring-expression annotation interface that helps annotators quickly focus on writing discriminative language with a few clicks. Experiments on RIS and REC benchmarks show that our AL framework consistently outperforms several AL baselines, while a user study shows up to 1.6X faster description labeling of ours.

Keystroke dynamics (typing patterns) can be used as a behavioural biometric modality for user authentication, with applications such as fraud prevention. While the modality has been shown to work well for single device authentication, its application to cross-device scenarios is more challenging. Dynamics learned on one device (eg., phone) may not be directly applicable to authentication on a secondary device with a different form factor (eg., tablet) due to changes in typing patterns that can lead to distribution drifts. To address this, we propose a cross-device user authentication system based on inductive transfer learning, where keystroke dynamics learned on one device are adapted to a secondary device. The adapted data is then combined with necessarily limited training data for the secondary device, which is used to robustly train a binary classifier. Furthermore, an extended set of keystroke features is used to better capture discriminative dynamics. Experiments on the BBMAS dataset show that proposed system achieves an equal error rate of 14.2% for the cross-device scenario, surpassing previous methods.

As Large Vision-Language Models increasingly aim to integrate visual generation and understanding within a single parameter space, evaluating such structural unification in a cohesive manner remains a critical challenge. Current evaluation protocols predominantly treat generative and discriminative capabilities as separate tasks, leaving a gap in system-level evaluation for unified multimodal models (UMMs). In this work, we propose Self-Generative-Understanding (SGU), a novel, annotation-free evaluation framework that probes the integrated capabilities of unified models through a semantic closed-loop challenge. Without requiring new annotations, SGU leverages the dual understanding-and-generation abilities of UMMs by asking them to first perceive an image and produce a textual description, subsequently reconstruct a visual context based on that description, and finally perform reasoning over the self-generated output. This pipeline provides a zero-cost testbed that yields an integrated performance score specifically tailored for evaluating UMMs as unified systems. Extensive experiments show that even high-performing UMMs often struggle to reason over their own generated contexts, revealing limitations that are not captured by separate evaluations of understanding or generation alone. Our work provides a complementary holistic evaluation framework and offers a foundation for benchmarking the development of next-generation unified multimodal models.

Generalized Category Discovery aims to recognize known categories while identifying novel ones within unlabeled data. Existing methods, typically based on self-supervision and contrastive learning, often struggle to capture fine-grained distinctions, relying on superficial visual cues rather than the intrinsic attributes humans use for categorization. We introduce Fourier Self-Supervision, that leverages the Fourier transform of images to enhance the discrimination of subtle differences and support the discovery of new categories. Our method employs a dual frequency filtering strategy: a low-pass filter first extracts broad, abstract attributes that capture high-level category information, while a high-pass filter emphasizes fine details such as edges and textures that are essential for fine-grained recognition. Each operates on a dedicated latent space, and their overlapping representations together yield a richer, more complete feature space. This dual-frequency approach not only refines feature extraction to identify novel categories, but also strengthens the model's discriminative power in fine-grained category discovery. Experiments on multiple fine-grained datasets show that incorporating Fourier Self-Supervision outperforms state-of-the-art methods, even when the number of classes is unknown, demonstrating its effectiveness for Generalized Category Discovery. Our code is available at: https://github.com/SarahRastegar/FourEx.

Embeddings have emerged as a standard representational interface linking foundation models with downstream systems. Most embedding benchmarks assess representations through discriminative tasks or geometric criteria centered on separability in embedding space. However, strong performance on such evaluations does not establish whether content compressed into an embedding remains accessible to a downstream generator. To address this gap, we introduce the Generative Embedding Benchmark (GEB), in which a decoder answers questions using only a frozen embedding and question text, without access to the original image or intermediate visual features. Answer quality under this readout measures generative information: the answer-relevant content recoverable from an embedding. GEB includes a curated visual-question-answering dataset with a 1,800-item development split and a held-out 900-item test split covering natural images, scene text, and visual documents. Using a common decoder and training recipe, we evaluate seven public embedding models in visual-only and vision-language joint modes. On the test set, visual-only scores range from 28.25 to 33.21; with image-question joint encoding, all five VLM-based embedding models score higher, and the best reaches 65.56. Matched embeddings also outperform text-only inputs, zero embeddings, and shuffled embeddings. Natural-image information is much easier to recover than scene text or visual-document information, while a Qwen3-VL-2B reference with access to the original image reaches 84.30. Together, these results show that generative readout exposes information bottlenecks that separability-based evaluation does not capture.

Zero-shot 3D visual grounding aims to localize specific objects based on textual descriptions and 3D visual input. However, the effectiveness of existing methods is significantly hindered by the ambiguous query text and deficient viewpoints. To address these issues, we propose TDVR, a training-free reasoning framework that disambiguates the input text and infers accurate viewpoints for zero-shot 3D visual grounding. First, we construct semantic 3D scene graph from the detected instances in the 3D point cloud. Subsequently, we put the original query, appearance and spatial relationship descriptions into the LLM for fusion, thereby disambiguating the initial input. We leverage chain-of-thought reasoning to generate the structured representation of disambiguated query. Then taking the scene graph and structured query as input, we get the optimal view via viewpoint reasoning to solve the problem of missing viewpoints during grounding. Based on the obtained optimal viewpoint, we further discriminate the distracting objects, enabling the model with the ability to distinguish similar instances. After that, we match the category text and appearance images with the query by computing the similarity of feature vectors. Finally, the target object was identified by integrating the viewpoint score, confusion score, category score, and appearance score. Compared with previous methods, our TDVR has stronger capabilities in viewpoint reasoning, similar object discrimination, and ambiguous query understanding. Experimental results on the public ScanRefer dataset show that our method outperforms the existing state-of-the-art methods by 15.25% and 14.46% in Acc@0.25 and Acc@0.5 respectively, demonstrating the effectiveness of our TDVR in addressing ambiguous query text and deficient viewpoints.

Scaling the corpus is the default remedy when a contrastive representation lacks an attribute. We report a case where it does nothing, and identify what does: adding a lexical-speech round to a frozen-base multimodal embedding model raises zero-shot keyword spotting by 76 points while reducing speech-emotion recognition by 14. The loss is not a capacity limit: fine-tuning on 7,442 clips from a prosody-controlled corpus recovers emotion past its pre-speech level at a five-point keyword cost. Nor is it data volume: 29,428 mined clips whose captions explicitly name emotions, at matched exposure, move emotion by -0.0007. The difference is structural: a contrastive objective encodes an attribute only when the in-batch negatives cannot be separated without it; the controlled corpus holds sentence content fixed, so prosody is the only separating signal, whereas mined captions name emotion yet remain separable by scene content. Intervention on the same audio confirms causality: raising caption similarity does not recover emotion, but collapsing caption diversity so that emotion becomes the only separating axis recovers it by 8.9 points across three seeds, with a smaller, same-signed gain on a non-acted corpus, while keyword accuracy trades back. Corpus structure, not size or caption vocabulary, controls what a contrastive audio embedding encodes.

Design and architectural archives encode expert human knowledge in graphical formats, providing a critical testbed for design-inspired Machine Learning (ML) challenges absent with typical computer vision benchmarks. Building on JONES-19, a small-size image dataset based on The Grammar of Ornament (London, 1857), we evaluate the discriminative performance of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in two model training strategies: (a) ImageNet pretraining for domain-general "visual common sense," and (b) learning from scratch on the design data in JONES-19. We find that while domain-general priors improve discriminative performance, learning from scratch augmented with repeated local sampling (multi-crop) effectively recovers these gains. For highly structured design data, local design-driven representations provide sufficient foundation for learning, challenging a reliance on massive general-purpose pretraining. These findings suggest that in specialized design domains, careful curation of smaller high-quality datasets that capture empirical and formal design principles may prove more effective and informative on the nature of a particular design domain than prioritizing large-scale data collection.

High-fidelity 3D generation predominantly relies on scaling model capacity and data, which incurs prohibitive computational costs. This paradigm typically requires learning geometry from scratch and overlooks the rich semantic and structural priors already encapsulated in discriminative 3D foundation models. We contend that leveraging the profound understanding of the 3D world possessed by these discriminative models can significantly reduce generative cost. To this end, we propose ROAD, a framework that reduces the training cost of 3D generation by transferring these rich discriminative priors into diffusion transformers. To address the inherent semantic-structural heterogeneity between generative and discriminative latents, we introduce a reciprocal-objective alignment strategy. This method synergizes Holistic Semantic Condensing to enforce global semantic coherence and Structural Optimal Alignment, which is formulated as a bipartite matching problem to rigorously align microscopic geometric details between disparate latent spaces. The 3D foundation model is only used for training-time supervision of alignment and is not used at inference, incurring no additional inference cost. Compared with the industrial baseline Step1X-3D, the proposed ROAD achieves highly competitive generation performance with only 1.5% of the training data and significantly reduces training costs, effectively reducing the computational overhead of high-fidelity 3D generation. Code is available at https://github.com/H-EmbodVis/ROAD.

This paper studies what discriminatively trained reward models (RMs) memorize by measuring counterfactual memorization on two human preference datasets. We show that RMs 1) misallocate memorization to easy, high margin preference pairs, 2) memorize dataset-specific shortcuts (e.g., model identity, user sampling strategy), and 3) overgeneralize simple heuristic correlates of human preference (e.g., length, compliance) when confronted with unseen preference pairs. Overall, our findings indicate that discriminative training of RMs from human preference data results in biased RMs not yet capable of judging response quality in context-dependent scenarios.

We introduce a novel learning problem: decoding gaze into natural language descriptions of human goals across diverse visual tasks. Unlike prior work, which frames gaze decoding as a discriminative task over predefined categories, we formulate it as a generative learning problem: training a model to produce free-form descriptions that capture the rich nuances and open-ended nature of human intentions beyond fixed labels. To this end, we introduce Gazette, the first gaze-to-text decoding framework. Based on multimodal large language models (MLLMs), Gazette learns to decode gaze scanpaths into natural language for goals that may extend beyond categorical labels and require articulation in natural language. To help Gazette filter out individual differences in gaze behavior and learn the goal-specific spatiotemporal dynamics crucial for generating accurate natural language goal descriptions, we propose a novel strategy that leverages the encyclopedic knowledge and reasoning abilities of a large language model to synthesize natural language explanations of goal-directed attentional behavior called think-aloud transcripts. Instruction tuning on these synthetic narratives allows Gazette to achieve state-of-the-art performance in gaze decoding across multiple tasks, demonstrating its generalizability and versatility, thereby enabling gaze to serve as a powerful, non-intrusive cue for inferring human goals and intentions in diverse scenarios.

Understanding and characterizing human color perception is a longstanding research goal. One of the most traditional approaches is looking for the human color discrimination thresholds, the minimum chromatic differences perceptible to human observers. In recent years, deep neural networks have become the standard networks for computer vision tasks. In particular, deep vision encoders, foundation models trained on large-scale visual data, map images into latent feature representations. Despite the widespread use of deep vision encoders, few studies have investigated whether their internal representations exhibit human-like discrimination thresholds. In this work, we present a large-scale exploratory study probing the chromatic sensitivity of more than 50 pretrained vision encoders, including convolutional networks and vision transformers, against human discrimination thresholds. Using controlled chromatic stimuli at multiple chroma levels, we compare model-derived chromatic discrimination thresholds with human discrimination ellipses through a region-overlap metric (mIoU). Our analysis reveals generally weak alignment between model representations and human perceptual thresholds across all model families, with the best mIoU < 0.25. Moreover, we find that self-supervised encoders consistently outperform supervised ones, while language-supervised models show the most polarized behavior, occupying both the top and bottom of the ranking. These findings suggest that human-like chromatic sensitivity does not emerge naturally from current large-scale visual training objectives for any of the analyzed architectures.

Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) algorithms are powerful tools for learning from and generalizing expert demonstrations, but they often rely on unconstrained exploration, rendering them unsafe for real-world deployment. Meanwhile, Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) can guarantee the safety of control systems, but the analytical design of CBFs can be time-consuming and esoteric. In this work, we address these limitations jointly by constraining reward function candidacy during IRL to the space of CBFs, yielding a formulation that exhibits safe online control with continuous experiential improvement. Crucially, this framework enables the data-driven recovery of barrier functions directly from unlabeled expert observations. We demonstrate that the recovered barrier function is robust to unsafe states entirely absent from the expert data. Furthermore, we benchmark our method against standard IRL baselines in a simulated navigation environment, demonstrating improved safety performance. Finally, we investigate the trade-offs of planning-based versus policy-based IRL methods across both simulation and a real world obstacle avoidance task.

Falling detection is vital for elderly care and intelligent surveillance; however, prevailing vision-based approaches predominantly frame it as static pose classification or discrete temporal pattern matching, fundamentally overlooking the instability dynamics of the human support system. This paper proposes a physics-informed falling detection framework that recasts falling as a stability-loss event in a coupled dynamical system. We introduce a novel dual-LTC architecture comprising a Center-of-Mass (CoM) subsystem and a Base-of-Support (BoS) subsystem, both instantiated as Liquid Time-Constant (LTC) neural networks to continuously model inertial trajectory evolution and ground-contact adjustment through adaptive time constants, Physical interpretability of falling motion. A learnable coupling module emulates physical interaction between the two subsystems, while a Stability Manifold classifier operates in the joint latent space to detect boundary crossing via Lyapunov-inspired stability metrics. Complementary counterfactual trajectory projection and Time-to-Collision (TTC) estimation further enable irreversibility assessment and early warning. The architecture is designed to support a three-state prediction paradigm (Normal, Falling, Fallen); in this preliminary study, we validate the core stability discrimination capability on a two-class dataset (Normal vs. Falling), leaving the full three-state temporal transition to future work. Unlike conventional CNN--RNN pipelines, the proposed formulation encodes continuous-time mechanical inertia, yielding a sub-50K-parameter network capable of real-time inference on resource-constrained edge devices. Extensive experiments demonstrate competitive accuracy with superior physical interpretability, validating its efficacy for low-compute visual fall detection.

First-shot anomalous sound detection in DCASE Challenge Task 2 must flag anomalies of unseen machine types with a single threshold, without knowing whether a test clip comes from the data-rich source domain (990 normal training clips) or the data-scarce target domain (10). Two organizer-reported problems remain open: source- and target-domain AUC are negatively correlated across systems, and development-set performance does not predict evaluation-set performance. We address both with a training-free post-hoc layer over frozen audio embeddings: (i) per-domain quantile calibration shrunk toward a pooled map by a prior strength m, tracing a source/target balance frontier, and (ii) a label-free cross-validated domain-balance criterion that ranks candidate configurations from training normals only, paired with a coarse development-labeled viability veto. On DCASE 2025, the criterion rank-predicts the official evaluation score across a 45-configuration grid (Spearman rho = +0.91; family-block bootstrap 95% CI [+0.83, +0.95]) while development score is uninformative (+0.06). Criterion-based selection raises the evaluation score from 55.83 to 59.34 (jackknife CI [2.2, 4.8]) and, on an extended grid, to 61.05 -- retrospectively fourth of 35 teams. Replicating on DCASE 2023 and 2024 bounds the claim: development score is uninformative in all three years and degenerate configurations recur (vetoed every time), but under family-clustered uncertainty the criterion's predictive evidence survives only in 2025; in both replication years a fixed full-equalization default matches or beats criterion-based selection. A DCASE 2026 forward test is frozen before the 2026 evaluation ground truth is released; all headline numbers are reproduced by the official evaluator.

The deployment of Industrial Anomaly Detection (IAD) in real-world manufacturing frequently encounters a challenging cold-start bottleneck, in which limited normal samples fail to represent the full normal distribution and only a few anomalies are available. Under such a regime, existing methods struggle to form compact normal boundaries and fail to effectively exploit supervised signals from rare defects. To address this challenge, we propose Anomaly-Rectified Cold-start AD (ArcAD), a plug-and-play calibration framework for reconstruction-based IAD baselines. ArcAD follows a push-pull learning paradigm to construct a compact and discriminative normal boundary under data scarcity. On the one hand, ArcAD projects limited normal samples onto a hypersphere and pulls them into multiple compact clusters to maximize coverage of the normal manifold. On the other hand, it synthesizes pseudo-anomalies on the hypersphere and leverages real anomalies to push the boundary inward and sharpen anomaly discrimination. Extensive experiments on MVTec-AD, VisA, Real-IAD, and MANTA demonstrate that ArcAD significantly outperforms state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised methods in both single-class and multi-class settings under cold-start conditions. Code is available at: https://github.com/LGC-AD/ArcAD.

Semi-supervised generative adversarial networks (SSL-GANs) can exploit large unlabeled datasets while retaining a classifier in the discriminator, but their training is often unstable. This paper proposes a population-based evolutionary training strategy in which discriminator learning is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem. Instead of aggregating the supervised and unsupervised components of the SSL objective into a single scalar loss, the method maintains a population of discriminators ranked by Pareto dominance, enabling the exploration of different trade-offs between classification accuracy and real/fake discrimination. This formulation aims to improve both roles of SSL-GANs: learning accurate classifiers and training generators capable of producing realistic samples. We analyze several variants, including an elitist strategy and a mono-objective ablation, to assess the role of multi-objective selection. Experiments on MNIST with limited labels show improved training robustness compared to SSL-GAN and CE-SSL-GAN state-of-the-art baselines, while the elitist variant consistently achieves the highest classification accuracy.

Infrared small target detection (IRSTD) remains challenging due to tiny target size, low signal-to-noise ratio, severe foreground-background imbalance, and blurred boundaries in complex scenes. Existing methods usually rely on post-activation probability-domain supervision for discrimination, where weak targets and strong clutter may produce saturated and close probabilities, limiting weak-target discrimination. Meanwhile, blurred boundaries and halo-like predictions mainly stem from thermal diffusion, tiny target scale, boundary uncertainty, and insufficient explicit contour constraints. To address these issues, we propose Adaptive-Contrastive SLSIoU (AC-SLSIoU), a plug-and-play discriminative and shape-aware loss for IRSTD. Specifically, a Logit-Domain Margin Constraint (LDMC) is introduced to enlarge the response gap between targets and informative hard negatives in the logit space, thereby enhancing weak-target discrimination. Adaptive Boundary Suppression (ABS) applies scale-aware annular penalties to refine target contours and suppress halo-like overflow responses. In addition, False-Alarm Focal Loss assigns larger weights to high-probability negative samples, further penalizing persistent high-confidence false alarms. Without introducing extra inference overhead, the proposed method can be seamlessly integrated into existing detectors and consistently improves both detection accuracy and shape quality. Extensive experiments and cross-backbone evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness, robustness, and generalization ability of the proposed method for infrared small target detection.

In this study, we examine learned preprocessing pipelines in the context of triage-oriented orthopedic abnormality detection task using elbow radiographs from MURA dataset. The evaluation focuses on patient-level detection of musculoskeletal abnormalities under a leakage-aware protocol. We compare multiple preprocessing pipelines, with and without a lightweight DnCNN module as a learned preprocessing component, to assess their impact on discrimination and calibration. Performance is assessed using discrimination metrics (AUROC, PR-AUC), calibration measures (ECE, Brier score), and validation-selected operating point analysis targeting high specificity. Results show that differences across preprocessing strategies are modest and configuration-dependent, with no consistent discrimination advantage over the raw-input DenseNet121 baseline. The raw and diverse inputs combined with the DnCNN front-end showed reduced ECE and Brier score, while CLAHE combined with DnCNN did not improve calibration. Overall, the results suggest that under patient-level evaluation, preprocessing gains are modest and configuration-dependent; the raw-input DenseNet121 baseline remains competitive throughout, and no tested preprocessing strategy produced a consistent discrimination advantage across all metrics.

Recent music audio-language models achieve high accuracy on instrument question-answering benchmarks, but it remains unclear whether this reflects robust audio grounding or benchmark-specific shortcuts. In this paper, we introduce an OpenMIC-derived diagnostic benchmark sequence for instrument grounding in music audio-language models, extending binary instrument-presence QA to genre-prior-reduced examples, confusable instrument discrimination, longer audio context, and temporal localization. Across these settings, high binary QA accuracy often fails to predict model behavior: models can exhibit option-position bias, confusable-instrument errors, and temporal response bias. These results suggest that instrument grounding should be evaluated with multi-axis diagnostic benchmarks rather than a single aggregate accuracy.

Visual classifiers can achieve high matched-distribution accuracy while relying on low-level cues that fail under conflict or suppression. We test whether this failure is shaped by early cue precision: the reliability with which a low-level cue predicts the label during early learning or downstream probe fitting. Across synthetic shape-texture tasks, sequential digit training, a 10-class frozen-representation audit, and a CIFAR-10 natural-image-based texture-overlay benchmark, we manipulate object-texture match probability and evaluate matched-ID accuracy, conflict accuracy, texture-choice rate, and suppression behavior. Degraded-but-predictive input does not substitute for cue decorrelation. In 10-class digit probes, conflict accuracy drops from 0.589 under chance-like cue precision to 0.005 under target-perfect texture. In CIFAR-10 frozen probes, conflict accuracy drops from 0.569 to 0.114, while texture choice rises from 0.049 to 0.855; this ordering persists across texture-overlay strengths alpha in {0.15,0.25,0.35,0.50}. End-to-end CIFAR-10 training shows that low early cue precision improves pre-target conflict behavior, but shortcut-rich fine-tuning can rapidly overwrite this benefit. Cue decorrelation must therefore be maintained during downstream adaptation rather than treated as a one-time inoculation.

Modern deepfake detectors are rarely consumed as bare classifiers. In moderation, provenance, and verification pipelines their output probability is read as a degree of trust, so its calibration matters as much as raw accuracy. We reframe deepfake detection as a calibrated, self-auditing trust instrument, the Calibrated Deepfake Trust Score (CDTS), and identify what governs its trustworthiness. Our central finding is a competence-calibration coupling: the calibration of the trust score degrades as the detector's discriminative competence falls. We establish it across 32 configurations (pooled Pearson r = -0.81), demonstrate it within a single dataset, reinforce it by inducing low competence directly, and replicate it on a fourth held-out dataset the detectors never trained on. It holds across three architecturally distinct detectors, two convolutional networks and a CLIP vision transformer (r = -0.88, -0.83, -0.86). The result is also deployable: a single calibrator frozen on in-domain data fails on exactly the low-competence generators the coupling flags (its error tracks competence at r = -0.98), and competence is estimable without labels, so a label-free monitor flags calibration risk on unseen generators and routing source-batches on a reference-free competence estimate lowers overall AURC and improves the low-to-mid coverage operating region relative to confidence-based routing. The same competence factor also drives calibration inequity across demographic subgroups (distinct from accuracy inequity) and explanation faithfulness. We therefore argue that detector trustworthiness is organized by competence as a shared driver, that competence is the right quantity to estimate and condition on, and that trust scoring must be competence-aware. We offer the CDTS wrapper as the mechanism, and report openly where the unification is tight and where it is architecture-specific.

We study the limits of CTC-internal scoring for N-best hypothesis selection and locate the information bottleneck separating acoustic confidence from linguistic plausibility. Eleven CTC-internal and acoustic-feature scoring strategies produce no statistically significant WER improvement over greedy decoding on LibriSpeech dev-other at G=16 (all p > 0.05). The exhaustion is systematic: CTC's Spearman $ρ$ between hypothesis score and per-utterance WER degrades from -0.574 at G=4 to -0.270 at G=128, a 53% loss driven by blank-path proliferation. This establishes that the discriminative capacity of CTC-internal representations is saturated: no recombination of acoustic signals can close the oracle gap. Confirming that the bottleneck is linguistic, not acoustic, external linguistic information introduced via MBR decoding breaks through it. MBR-CER decoding with a RoBERTa pseudo-log-likelihood (PLL) posterior ($τ$=10, G=128) achieves 5.42% WER on held-out LibriSpeech test-other (greedy 5.96%, $Δ$=-0.535 pp, p<0.0001, 9.0% relative). RoBERTa PLL $ρ$ degrades only 21% over the same range, retaining discriminating power where CTC loses it. Applied without retuning across two Zipformer architectures, three domains (LibriSpeech, TED-LIUM 3, VoxPopuli), and four MUSAN noise levels, the recipe gives significant gains in 11 of 13 conditions. On the training side, standard MWER training via the CTC forward-backward algorithm implements Rao-Blackwellized REINFORCE at the output projection (variance about 3x below Viterbi). Yet sequence-level fine-tuning fails at near-converged checkpoints: all four MWER configurations on CR-CTC collapse (+6.18 to +8.90 pp WER), as a training oracle gap of 0.007 pp provides no usable reward signal.

Machine learning models have been shown to exhibit discriminatory outcomes or degraded performance for individuals at the intersection of multiple sensitive attributes, such as race and gender. This stems in part from two interrelated challenges: the lack of principled measures for quantifying bias (potentially intersectional), and insufficient representation of intersectional subgroups in training data. We extend a recent bias mitigation framework to incorporate coverage constraints that enforce sufficient representation across groups, including intersectional subgroups. Since achieving exactly zero bias for all groups may not be data efficient (meaning it may require large amounts of data), our solution trades small approximation errors in bias for greater data efficiency while satisfying coverage constraints. We also formulate bias mitigation as an integer linear program that optimizes over all mitigation strategies, and characterize the price of fairness, the minimum data modification cost, as a function of fairness tolerance. This is essential both for legal compliance, where regulations may mandate specific fairness thresholds, and for data governance, enabling practitioners to make informed trade-offs between bias reduction and data modification (particularly, data purchasing) costs. We evaluate our techniques on publicly available datasets, demonstrating that bias mitigation via our framework preserves predictive accuracy across multiple classifiers, and that coverage constraints, while motivated by statistical considerations, are essential for preserving downstream ML performance.

LLM-as-a-Judge has become the dominant evaluation paradigm for language models, but judge validation in practice relies on exact-match agreement, a metric that does not correct for chance and systematically overstates discriminative ability. We present the largest systematic evaluation of LLM-as-a-Judge to date: 21 judges from nine providers across MT-Bench, JudgeBench, and RewardBench, evaluated under three protocols (agreement, consistency, bias audit) over 118 runs and approximately 541,000 individual judgments. Four findings emerge, consistent across the full cohort, including the April 2026 frontier: kappa deflation between exact match and Cohen's kappa is universal (33--41 pp on MT-Bench), judge rankings shift by up to 14 positions across benchmarks, high test--retest reliability (>0.95) coexists with severe position bias (>0.10) in two production-deployed judges (instantiating a consistency--bias paradox), and verbosity bias is small (<0.011) across our cohort under a single pairwise rubric. We distill these into a Minimum Viable Validation Protocol.

Automatic metrics are the default for evaluating LLM-generated text, yet a metric is quietly asked to do two jobs: tell genuine content alignment from surface coincidence (validity), and tell a better system from a worse one (discriminative power). On open-ended, opinion-driven question answering, the two are in tension. We introduce RECOM (Reddit Evaluation for Correspondence of Models), a contamination-free evaluation dataset of 15,000 r/AskReddit questions (September 2025), each paired with its authentic community replies, which postdate every evaluated model's training cutoff. Scoring five open-source LLMs (7--10B) against every reply each metric paired with a random-derangement noise floor we find that no metric does both jobs well. Cosine similarity separates real from random answers (Cohen's $d \approx 2$) but cannot rank the five models ($|d| < 0.1$); BERTScore precision appears to rank the models (raw $|d|$ up to 0.63), but once response length is controlled this collapses to $|d| = 0.09$ and its validity is weak ($d \approx 0.8$, versus cosine's $\approx 2$). Because every metric scores the same outputs, this validity--discrimination tradeoff is a property of the metrics, not the models, and we argue it stems from representation design. Three independent LLM judges reproduce the validity gap and likewise separate the five models only weakly. We recommend reporting metrics on both axes, with an explicit random-baseline floor. RECOM is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/recom-D4B0

Item discrimination is a fundamental psychometric property of educational assessment, which measures whether an item meaningfully distinguishes students with higher proficiency from students with lower proficiency. While various existing works have explored whether large language models (LLMs) can estimate item difficulty, it remains unclear whether they can capture item discrimination. In this work, we evaluate 42 proprietary and open-weight LLMs in zero-shot settings using two complementary approaches: direct discrimination prediction, where models explicitly estimate an item's discrimination value from its content, and response-based Classical Test Theory (CTT) calibration, where LLM answers are treated as synthetic student responses to compute discrimination scores. Our results show that direct prediction yields weak alignment with human-calibrated discrimination: the best-performing model reaches only a Spearman correlation of 0.152. Response-based CTT calibration provides a stronger but still limited signal, with the all-persona synthetic respondent pool reaching a Spearman correlation of 0.241. These findings highlight item discrimination as an open challenge for LLM-based psychometric evaluation: current LLMs contain non-random discrimination-relevant signal, but they do not yet reliably capture how assessment items distinguish human students.

We train a two-layer transformer encoder to classify rational elliptic curves $E/\mathbb{Q}$ of conductor $\leq 10000$ as either rank 0 or rank 1 from the first 128 normalized Frobenius traces. We achieve >99% accuracy on both classes, and accuracy is essentially unchanged on test curves with no isogeny or quadratic-twist relative in the training set. We then apply techniques from mechanistic interpretability such as attention analysis, linear probing, activation patching, logit attribution, and neuron-level circuit analysis to reverse-engineer the algorithm the (centroid in function space) model learned. We find that a sparse circuit of 20 out of 512 layer-1 MLP neurons is sufficient for rank prediction under a linear probe with an AUROC of 0.992 at plateau, implementing a push-pull detector architecture of rank-0 and rank-1 detectors with a one-sided readout. However, we notice that the model has sub-optimal readout problems indicating a mismatch in rank-order between the readout pathway and the discriminative circuit. Critically, the learned input weights of the top discriminating neuron match the Mestre-Nagao sum heuristic weights $\log(p)/(p\cdot \log{B})$ with a Spearman coefficient $r = 0.997$ and Pearson coefficient $r = 0.952$: the model has learnt a result from analytic number theory from the Frobenius trace data alone. We additionally find that all 50 independently trained models concentrate CLS attention on prime positions at 2-50$\times$ the rate of composite positions. The CLS embedding encodes $\log{L(E,1)}$ with $R^2 = 0.962\pm 0.011$ across the 50 models (after controlling for the conductor). Activation patching analysis reveals that attention weights are dissociated from causal information flow. Additionally, the 50 solutions from training are near-identical in function space (with pairwise agreement $>$98.8%) despite large weight space barriers.

Learning systems based on IF-THEN rule representations readily offer interpretability, making them a crucial focus in contemporary AI research. A key objective for such rule sets is to achieve both high discriminative power and interpretability. While existing state-of-the-art algorithms implicitly prioritize predictive accuracy, they often fall short on one or more quality metrics that ensure interpretability, such as coverage and parsimony of rule sets. Motivated by this, this paper propose the development of CDPR, which aims to create highly accurate and interpretable rule sets for classification problems. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first attempt to establish such an approach. In this study, we introduce two algorithms rooted in submodular maximization, which not only provide provable guarantees on coverage but also yield rule sets that are both discriminative and parsimonious. We empirically demonstrate that rule sets learned through our approaches achieve higher accuracy and interpretability and has more than a 2.5-fold improvement in average coverage rates when compared to the next best algorithm.

We study training-free fixed-length descriptors for multivariate time series and ask not merely whether such a descriptor performs well, but when it can be expected to work at all. Our object of study is $D(τ)$, built from a time-lagged correlation matrix truncated at the Marchenko-Pastur edge so that only signal-bearing eigenvalues survive and classified by cosine similarity to class centroids with zero learned parameters. The central contribution is not the descriptor but a falsifiable applicability criterion for it. Working from a stationary Gaussian VAR(1) model, we argue that $D(τ)$ separates two classes when the signals are approximately stationary and the class information lives in their cross-channel temporal coupling rather than in marginal per-channel power. We derive, semi-formally, three consequences: a distinguishability condition, why the static ($τ=0$) covariance collapses to chance, and why a stationary but power-discriminated paradigm defeats the descriptor. The criterion is operational: a two-part pre-flight test -- an augmented Dickey-Fuller stationarity check and a power-baseline saturation check -- predicts applicability before any training. We validate both halves on a mixed assortment. On four paradigms that satisfy the criterion (Sleep-EDF, BCI-IV-2a, MIT-BIH, ESC-50) the descriptor is competitive with strong baselines at a fraction of their cost, reaching $88.5\pm4.5\%$ under 20-subject leave-one-subject-out on Sleep-EDF on a single CPU thread. On three that violate it -- non-stationary ERPs, and financial-volatility and wearable-stress regimes that are power-discriminated -- it fails exactly as the pre-flight predicts, and these negatives are the more informative half. We are explicit that $D(τ)$ is not the most accurate representation; its value is a compact, training-free embedding whose domain of validity is known in advance.

Knowledge Distillation (KD) and mixup have proven effective at inducing smoothness in class boundaries; KD captures inherent class relationships in probability distributions, and mixup enforces them through convex combinations of inputs. Their interaction, however, remains poorly understood, particularly when mixup is applied only during student training. In this setting, the teacher is queried on inputs drawn from a vicinal distribution it never saw during training, a controlled mismatch whose effect on knowledge transfer has not been characterised. We show that this mismatch causes the teacher's supervisory signal to be dominated by distributional confusion rather than inter-class structure. Despite it, the student does not merely imitate the teacher: it independently acquires greater linearity in the vicinal region, a structural property that the teacher lacks, and goes beyond dark-knowledge transfer. KD with mixup consistently improves student accuracy and reduces overconfidence by an order of magnitude relative to the baseline, across CIFAR and ImageNet with varying-capacity teachers. Crucially, calibration propagates from teacher to student independently of accuracy transfer, and temperature scaling governs a measurable accuracy-calibration trade-off that becomes more pronounced under vicinal training. These results reframe mixup distillation not as a degraded version of standard KD, but as a richer transfer channel that simultaneously shapes discriminative performance, uncertainty estimation, and representational geometry.

Attributing a synthetic utterance to its originating system remains an open challenge: closed-set models fail to reject unseen synthesizers and produce overconfident predictions. To address this, we propose a dual-branch gated fusion framework that pairs XLSR-53 with CORES, a 66-dimensional descriptor that, unlike prior Linear Filter Bank (LFB)-only work, spans cepstral, oscillatory, rhythmic, energy, and spectral dimensions to capture complementary synthesis artifacts. Our analysis shows XLSR-53 remains discriminative in-domain (ID) while CORES generalizes stably under distribution shift (OOD), yet their naive concatenation fails due to SSL representational imbalance. To resolve this, an input-conditioned gate adaptively weights each branch under joint training with cross-entropy, an energy margin loss for ID/OOD separation, and a gate diversity term. On the MLAAD benchmark, our system achieves 97.6% ID accuracy, 4.9% EERc, and an 83.5% relative FPR95 reduction over the Interspeech 2025 baseline.

The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has raised concerns about misuse such as plagiarism, misinformation, and automated influence operations, motivating the need for robust detectors. Recent work has shown that neural representations of writing style are effective for detection and, crucially, robust to adversarial attacks that defeat most existing detectors. However, current style-based detectors rely on authorship labels for training, and are limited to few-shot inference for detection, requiring in-distribution samples that may not always be available. We learn discriminative style features without authorship labels by training a style encoder to reconstruct human-authored text from its machine-generated paraphrase; freezing a semantic encoder during training biases the style encoder to capture only the non-semantic features needed for reconstruction. We evaluate the learned representations via two detection strategies: a few-shot detector and a zero-shot DeepSVDD-based detector. Across benchmarks, our method matches or outperforms all baselines in the few-shot setting and, in the zero-shot regime, is competitive with fully supervised classifiers on in-distribution test data while generalizing better to unseen LLMs. Beyond detection, the learned representations generalize to unseen tasks, achieving competitive performance on authorship verification and fine-grained style discrimination despite never being trained on either objective.

Diffusion models have demonstrated remarkable generative capabilities and have also emerged as powerful self-supervised representation learners, yet the connection between these two abilities remains less explored. Drawing inspiration from self-supervised learning (SSL), we introduce a framework for jointly evaluating the representation and generation capabilities of diffusion models. Specifically, we decompose features into invariant and residual components and derive the Invariant Contamination Ratio (ICR), a Fisher-based metric that quantifies how residual variation contaminates invariant signal in feature space. We use this framework to analyze both discriminative and generative behavior of diffusion models. On the representation side, we find that invariance peaks at intermediate noise levels, which also yield the best downstream classification performance. On the generative side, we study how training transitions from genuine generalization to memorization in data-limited regimes, and show that ICR serves as a sensitive training-time indicator of early learning: increasing residual energy along Fisher directions marks the onset of memorization, detectable from training features alone without external evaluators or held-out test sets. Overall, our results show that diffusion models can be monitored from a self-supervised perspective through the geometry of their learned representations.

Rubric-based evaluation is a promising paradigm for judging large language model (LLM) outputs, yet self-generated rubrics lag human-annotated criteria on hard instances. We argue this discriminative gap reflects an objective mismatch: self-generated rubrics describe good responses, whereas effective criteria must discriminate between close candidates. To close this gap, we introduce SVR (Support Vector Rubrics), a framework that recasts rubric construction as max-margin boundary learning over preference data. SVR mines contrastive features from preference pairs into a rubric bank, learns a prompt-conditioned selector together with global rubric weights, and iteratively refines the bank through support-pair selection and adversarial probing of hard negatives. At inference, given only the prompt, SVR retrieves the top-rubrics from the bank and scores responses. On RubricBench, SVR narrows the gap to human reference rubrics from 24.1 to 0.3 points and outperforms strong self-rubric and judge baselines, and the learned bank transfers across judges without retraining. On RewardBench 1&2, and RM-Bench, it remains competitive with dedicated reward models, demonstrating broader reward modeling capability. Overall, boundary-defining rubrics offer a principled route to closing the discriminative gap in LLM evaluation.

Data-driven pricing is increasingly prevalent in sectors such as airlines, lending, insurance, and retail. By learning demand models from customer features and setting prices accordingly, these systems may generate discriminatory outcomes that raise fairness concerns. This leads to fundamental questions - how and where should systems incorporate fairness considerations in the pricing pipeline, and how does it ultimately affect societal outcomes? To answer these, we study a stylized model where a seller has a two-stage decision pipeline comprising linear demand model estimation followed by price optimization. The seller considers fairness notions in training loss, price, and demand, under both parity-wise and Rawlsian perspectives. We show that equalizing training loss across consumer groups leads to multiple solutions, which in turn can result in undesirable outcomes despite being a standard approach in fair machine learning. Focusing instead on fairness applied directly to prices or demand, we compare two strategies that enforce fairness in either the demand estimation stage or the price optimization stage. For parity-wise fairness, we characterize when each strategy yields higher social welfare under small fairness levels. We show that when market sizes and prices in the dataset are similar, imposing price fairness in the estimation stage is more beneficial to consumers, whereas imposing demand fairness in the optimization stage yields better consumer outcomes. For Rawlsian fairness, the two strategies coincide exactly. Lastly, we extend our model to alternate demand functions and conduct a case study using real-world vaccine pricing data.

Multimodal sentiment analysis (MSA) infers human affect from language, acoustic, and visual signals. Recent methods increasingly adapt large multimodal models (LMMs) via generative readout: prompting the model to emit a sentiment score as a text string. While convenient, this ties continuous regression to discrete autoregressive decoding, incurring unmeasured costs. We revisit this readout mechanism and propose a discriminative formulation built on the Thinker module of a native omni-modal LLM (Qwen2.5-Omni-7B). Instead of text decoding, we map the final-layer hidden state of the last non-padding token to a continuous score via a lightweight regression head in a single forward pass. Using 4-bit quantization and low-rank adaptation (QLoRA), the entire 7B pipeline -- including video and audio processing -- trains on a single consumer GPU (RTX 5090, 32 GB) with 10-21 GB peak memory and 1.14% trainable parameters. Through a controlled comparison fixing the backbone, data, and LoRA configuration, we isolate the impact of the readout. On CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI, our discriminative readout reaches state-of-the-art accuracy without task-specific feature engineering (MOSI: MAE 0.551, Corr 0.888; MOSEI: MAE 0.506, Corr 0.790) and exhibits strong multi-seed stability. In contrast, the generative readout -- even after equivalent supervised training -- more than doubles the mean absolute error, yields unparsable or out-of-range outputs (2.8% zero-shot), and suffers from higher latency. Modality ablations reveal a text-dominant regime on CMU-MOSI. Our findings indicate that how an LMM is read out is as consequential as how it is trained, demonstrating that a discriminative readout offers a more accurate, efficient, and reliable alternative for continuous MSA.

The Forward-Forward (FF) algorithm offers a computationally efficient and biologically plausible alternative to backpropagation (BP) by training neural networks through purely local, layer-wise optimization. However, FF is inherently designed for classification via contrastive positive-negative sample pairs, and extending it to regression poses fundamental challenges: continuous target space lack natural "opposites" for contrastive learning, and the standard goodness function carries no information about target magnitude or ordering. We propose FFR (Forward-Forward for Regression), to our knowledge, the first framework to extend FF to real-world regression and demonstrate competitive performance across diverse real-world datasets. FFR introduces three key innovations: (1) an ordinal competitive goodness function that replaces contrastive pairs with competitive learning between partitioned neuron groups under distance-aware ordinal supervision; (2) a stratified ladder architecture where shallow layers learn coarse ordinal discrimination and deeper layers refine into fine-grained regression, with multi-scale feature aggregation for inter-layer collaboration; and (3) hierarchical prediction with uncertainty estimation, where multi-scale predictors jointly provide robust predictions and prediction confidence as a free-lunch. Extensive experimental results show FFR recovers on average 98.6% of BP's accuracy across five real-world regression benchmarks while reducing peak training memory to only 27% of BP's at depth 8 and 8% at depth 32, with per-iteration time around 72% of BP's, and substantially outperforms all BP-free competitors.

In this study, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of generative and discriminative deep learning-based speech enhancement methods, specifically in noise reduction tasks. Our investigation focuses on evaluating their effectiveness under high and low signal-to-noise ratio conditions, considering both matched and mismatched training scenarios. We further investigate the impact of training data volume, model convergence speed, and interpret the performance differences in terms of objective results for the considered training paradigms. Additionally, we compare the complexity-performance trade-off and the practical viability of these approaches. To further strengthen the evaluation, we study the hallucination characteristics of generative approaches in terms of word error rate and phoneme similarity. The insights derived from this study provide empirical evidence to assist researchers and practitioners in understanding whether the perceptual gains of different approaches justify their computational cost in practical applications.

Modern neural networks are highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations. In this work, we identify that part of this vulnerability stems from the sensitivity of the widely used fully connected (FC) classifiers to such perturbations. In contrast, simple $\ell_2$ distance-based classifiers exhibit significantly greater robustness. We provide thorough theoretical and empirical analysis showing that while FC classifiers' high sensitivity makes them discriminative, it also makes them vulnerable. Conversely, $\ell_2$-classifiers' insensitivity grants robustness but limits performance. Motivated by this trade-off, we propose a novel $\ell_2$-reclassifier based on a Hybrid Prototype Mixing (HPM) framework. This method retains the discriminative power of FC classifiers while leveraging the robustness of $\ell_2$ distance. It yields $\ell_2$-distance-based predictions by fusing two prototype types: (1) stable, dataset-level prototypes updated via EMA, and (2) dynamic, batch-level prototypes generated from the FC classifier's predictions using a Straight-Through Estimator (STE). However, this dynamic, STE-based architecture introduces significant challenges for evaluation, such as gradient obfuscation and forward discontinuity. To address this, we propose a new, rigorous evaluation protocol, the Mixed Surrogate Attack (MSA), which uses multiple surrogates along with powerful AutoAttack to ensure a fair and robust assessment. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our lightweight, plug-and-play module, with minimal fine-tuning, effectively enhances the adversarial robustness of various existing SOTA adversarially trained models.

We study the problem of assigning a scalar score to a short trajectory window that reflects its position on an ordered continuum of predictability regimes, spanning structured deterministic dynamics to unstructured stochastic noise. Existing methods address deterministic-versus-stochastic discrimination within a single system and do not produce scores with a consistent numerical interpretation across systems. We formalize this as ordinal estimation over a five-level predictability ladder and identify a structural source of cross-system ambiguity: ranking supervision alone leaves the score coordinate unfixed up to a monotone reparameterization, which we term the gauge freedom of ordinal scoring. We propose the Gauge-Fixed Ordinal Network (GON), a temporal convolutional model trained with an anchor-and-variance objective that pins level-wise score means to shared target coordinates. GON operates on 2-jet features that expose local trajectory geometry, preserved by smooth flows and disrupted by stochastic surrogate procedures. On five held-out dynamical systems, initializing from a pretrained GON checkpoint consistently outperforms training from scratch across all window budgets, with adaptation depth reflecting geometric proximity to the training family. Zero-shot scores retain ordinal structure at the stochastic boundary, where surrogate procedures most strongly disrupt nonlinear geometry, and pretrained initialization consistently beats scratch across all window budgets. Pairwise discrimination and globally coherent ordinal scoring are distinct properties requiring a stable score coordinate for cross-system transfer, with direct implications for predictability assessment, model selection, and early-warning diagnostics across natural and engineered dynamical systems.

Discriminative and generative vision models excel in their respective domains but remain semantically misaligned, hindering progress toward unified visual learning. We introduce LEASE (LEArning from SEmantic Dictionaries), a self-supervised framework that bridges this gap using a paired generative-discriminative codebook design. LEASE operates entirely in a discrete token space produced through a one-time precomputation step, enabling efficient training without data augmentations, teacher models, or online tokenizers. LEASE integrates two complementary objectives: a masked token reconstruction loss that captures fine-grained generative detail, and a codebook contrast loss that aligns encoder features with discriminative semantics via adaptive centroid weighting. This dual supervision yields a unified latent space that supports both high-quality generation and strong representation learning. On ImageNet-1K, LEASE achieves state-of-the-art unified performance, outperforming prior VQGAN-based methods such as MAGE and Sorcen across linear probing (up to +1.7%), unconditional generation (-1.26 FID and +10.19 IS w.r.t MAGE), few-shot learning (+0.56% on average against Sorcen), transfer (+0.75% average improvement against MAGE and Sorcen), and robustness benchmarks (+5.86% and +4.25% average improvement against MAGE and Sorcen, respectively). It also competes favorably with domain-specialized contrastive and generative models while surpassing previous MIM methods. The unsupervised LEASE model can also be extended to conditional generation by building upon its learned representations, proving competitive with specialized baselines. Overall, LEASE provides an efficient and effective step toward general-purpose vision models that jointly understand and generate visual content.

A central question in computational vision is whether human-like visual representations are better explained by discriminative or generative learning. Existing comparisons, however, often confound the learning objective with architecture, scale, and training data, leaving open whether the objective itself drives alignment. We address this confound using Joint Energy-Based Models (JEMs), which interpolate continuously between discriminative and generative training within a fixed architecture. By varying a single mixing coefficient, we isolate the effect of the learning objective and evaluate the resulting models across six human-alignment benchmarks spanning perceptual similarity, gloss perception, human response uncertainty, robustness, shape-texture cue conflict, and diagnostic feature attribution. Across this diverse suite, human alignment is consistently maximized at intermediate points of the generative-discriminative continuum, rather than at either endpoint. Hybrid JEMs combine the categorical structure induced by discriminative learning with the sensitivity to input structure induced by generative learning, yielding more human-like behavior across multiple levels of vision. These results suggest that the generative-discriminative dichotomy is the wrong axis for understanding human-aligned vision: alignment emerges not from choosing one objective over the other, but from balancing both.

Generative augmentation is often proposed as a remedy for small medical-image datasets, but synthetic images are only useful when they improve downstream task performance. "Augmentation" here means synthetic supplementation: GAN-generated samples added to the real training pool, not geometric or photometric transforms of existing images. Twelve class-plane StyleGAN2-ADA generators were trained on constrained BRISC 2025 partitions to test whether their output, with or without InceptionV3 feature-space filtering, improves held-out tumour classification across three classifier families: a random forest (RF) on InceptionV3 features, a compact two-headed convolutional neural network (CNN), and MobileViTV2, a mobile hybrid convolutional-transformer. Each was evaluated at 1:1 and 1:2 real-to-synthetic ratios. An independent GPT-5.5 blind test placed gated real-versus-synthetic discrimination at 57.73% (95% CI: 54.48--60.92%) on the model-legible subset -- modestly above chance. The RF classifier did not benefit from the synthetic MRIs. The CNN showed consistent mean gains that did not survive Holm correction. MobileViTV2 showed the clearest benefit: filtered 1:1 augmentation improved tumour classification accuracy by 1.02% absolute (95% CI: 0.54--1.54%; Holm-corrected p = 0.0104). A secondary efficiency analysis found that every augmented CNN condition selected its checkpoint 42--64% earlier than baseline, while compute-matched MobileViTV2 runs reached selection after 50--67% fewer real-data epochs. Overall, augmentation utility was found to be architecture- and ratio-dependent, not guaranteed by visual fidelity alone.

Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a central technique for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models. Despite its effectiveness, how response-level rewards translate into token-level probability changes remains poorly understood. We introduce a discriminator view of RLVR updates, showing that the policy-gradient update direction implicitly acts as a linear discriminator over token-gradient vectors and thereby determines which token probabilities are increased or decreased during learning. Under standard sequence-level RLVR, this discriminator is constructed from positive- and negative-side centroids formed by advantage-weighted averaging of token-gradient vectors. However, such centroid construction can be dominated by shared high-frequency patterns, such as formatting tokens, diluting sparse yet discriminative directions that better distinguish high-reward responses from low-reward ones. To address this limitation, we propose $\textbf{DelTA}$, a discriminative token credit assignment method that estimates token coefficients to amplify side-specific token-gradient directions and downweight shared or weakly discriminative ones. These coefficients reweight a self-normalized RLVR surrogate, making the effective side-wise centroids more contrastive and thereby reshaping the RLVR update direction. On seven mathematical benchmarks, DelTA outperforms the strongest same-scale baselines by 3.26 and 2.62 average points on Qwen3-8B-Base and Qwen3-14B-Base, respectively. Additional results on code generation, a different backbone, and out-of-domain evaluations further demonstrate the generalization ability of DelTA.

Recently, instance discrimination models have emerged as a major solution for self-supervised learning. Having already demonstrated its effectiveness in the image domain, instance discrimination learning is now proving equally convincing in the graph domain, in particular for node classification. However, fewer contributions have tackled the link prediction task. In this contribution, we propose to adapt existing methods to this context. We first provide a rigorous evaluation of existing self-supervised models in the field of link prediction, showing that the main performance depends on the augmentation process (like in computer vision). We then propose a new structural augmentation based on the community structure that is relevant for link prediction. Our main contribution introduces two new models, L-GRACE and L-BGRL, based on link representations instead of node representations, which improve the performance of the existing methods, especially on unattributed graphs, and we show that they perform on par with the state of the art, both in supervised and self-supervised contexts.

Audio super-resolution (SR), also referred to as bandwidth extension (BWE), aims to reconstruct high-fidelity signals from low-resolution (LR) or band-limited (BL) observations, an inherently ill-posed task due to the ambiguity of missing high-frequency (HF) content. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the field, with a particular focus on the paradigm shift from discriminative mapping to modern generative modeling. We first review early discriminative deep neural network (DNN) models, which formulate BWE/SR as a deterministic mapping problem and are prone to regression-to-the-mean effects and spectral over-smoothing. We then systematically review generative approaches, including autoregressive (AR) models, variational autoencoders (VAEs), generative adversarial networks (GANs), diffusion and score-based models, flow-based methods, and Schrödinger bridges. Across these approaches, we examine key design aspects, including representation domain, architecture, conditioning mechanisms, and trade-offs among reconstruction fidelity, perceptual quality, robustness, and computational efficiency. Furthermore, we discuss emerging directions involving large language models (LLMs) and multimodal foundation models, and highlight open challenges in perceptual evaluation, phase modeling, and real-world generalization. By providing a structured taxonomy and unified perspective, this survey establishes a comprehensive foundation and offers a practical roadmap for advancing BWE/SR from deterministic point estimation toward distribution-aware generative modeling.

Referring Multi-Object Tracking (RMOT) faces a fundamental structural contradiction between the high-discriminability demand and the sparse semantic supervision. This mismatch is particularly acute in highly homogeneous scenarios that require fine-grained discrimination over complex compositional semantics. However, under sparse supervision, models overfit to salient yet insufficient cues, thereby encouraging shortcut learning and semantic collapse. To resolve this, we propose COAL (Counterfactual and Observation-enhanced Alignment Learning), a framework that advances RMOT beyond isolated structural optimization through knowledge regularization. First, we introduce Explicit Semantic Injection (ESI) via a VLM to densify the observation space and enhance instance discriminability. Second, leveraging LLM reasoning, we propose Counterfactual Learning (CFL) to augment supervision, enforcing strict attribute verification for robust compositional recognition. These strategies are unified within a Hierarchical Multi-Stream Integration (HMSI) architecture, which distills external knowledge into domain-specific discriminative representations. Experiments on Refer-KITTI and Refer-KITTI-V2 benchmarks validate COAL's efficacy. Notably, it surpasses the state-of-the-art by 7.28% HOTA on the highly challenging Refer-KITTI-V2. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of knowledge regularization for resolving the sparsity-discriminability paradox in RMOT.

Diabetes mellitus affects over 537 million adults worldwide and remains a major challenge in preventive healthcare. Existing machine-learning studies primarily formulate diabetes prediction as a binary classification problem, while subtype-oriented analysis and glycaemic-cognitive associations remain comparatively underexplored. We present a reproducible three-stage machine learning framework for diabetes detection, subtype-oriented clustering, and metabolic-cognitive association analysis. In Stage 1, five supervised classifiers together with a stacking ensemble are benchmarked on the NCSU Diabetes Dataset using stratified five-fold cross-validation and evaluation metrics including ROC-AUC, balanced accuracy, recall, and F1-score. SVM-RBF and Logistic Regression achieve the highest ROC-AUC ($0.825 \pm 0.026$), while Random Forest achieves the highest accuracy ($0.762 \pm 0.030$). SHAP explainability identifies Glucose, BMI, and Age as the dominant predictive biomarkers. In Stage 2, silhouette-validated K-Means clustering ($k=2$, silhouette $\approx 0.116$) is applied to confirmed diabetic cases using Glucose, Insulin, and Age, recovering clinically plausible subtype-oriented partitions without requiring ground-truth subtype labels. In Stage 3, statistical analysis of the Ohio Longitudinal Cognitive Dataset ($n=373$) reveals a significant positive association between glycaemic control and cognitive function ($ρ_s = 0.208$, $p = 5.29 \times 10^{-5}$), which survives Holm correction. The findings support the utility of statistically grounded and interpretable ML pipelines for reproducible diabetes analytics and subtype-aware exploratory analysis.

In many real-world computer vision applications, including medical imaging and industrial inspection, binary classification tasks are characterized by a severe scarcity of positive samples. A widely adopted solution is to generate synthetic positive data using image-to-image transformations applied to negative samples. However, a fundamental challenge remains: how can we reliably assess whether such synthetic data will improve downstream model performance? In this work, we propose a geometry-driven metric that predicts the utility of synthetic data without requiring model training. Our approach operates in the embedding space of a pre-trained foundation model and represents the dataset through difference vectors between samples. We evaluate whether the weight vector of a linear classifier can be expressed within the subspace spanned by these variations by measuring the relative projection error. Intuitively, if the variations induced by synthetic data capture task-relevant directions, their span can approximate the classifier, resulting in low projection error. Conversely, poor synthetic data fails to span these directions, leading to higher error. Across multiple datasets and architectures, we show that this metric exhibits strong correlation with downstream classification performance of CNNs trained on mixtures of real negative and synthetic positive data. These findings suggest that the proposed metric serves as a practical and informative tool for evaluating synthetic data quality in data-scarce settings.

In this paper, we propose the first VL$\underline{\textbf{M}}$ $\underline{\textbf{a}}$gentic $\underline{\textbf{r}}$easoning framework for few-$\underline{\textbf{s}}$hot multimodal $\underline{\textbf{T}}$ime $\underline{\textbf{S}}$eries $\underline{\textbf{C}}$lassification ($\textbf{MarsTSC}$), which introduces a self-evolving knowledge bank as a dynamic context iteratively refined via reflective agentic reasoning. The framework comprises three collaborative roles: i) Generator conducts reliable classification via reasoning; ii) Reflector diagnoses the root causes of reasoning errors to yield discriminative insights targeting the temporal features overlooked by Generator; iii) Modifier applies verified updates to the knowledge bank to prevent context collapse. We further introduce a test-time update strategy to enable cautious, continuous knowledge bank refinement to mitigate few-shot bias and distribution shift. Extensive experiments across 12 mainstream time series benchmarks demonstrate that $\textbf{MarsTSC}$ delivers substantial and consistent performance gains across 6 VLM backbones, outperforming both classical and foundation model-based time series baselines under few-shot conditions, while producing interpretable rationales that ground each classification decision in human-readable feature evidence.