Fault Diagnosis

Learned dynamics models often answer global physical questions, such as fault severity or impact stiffness, by pooling a per-step feature sequence into one readout vector. This sequence-to-global interface creates an under-studied temporal credit problem: with only trajectory-level supervision, a model can predict accurately in training conditions while reading from abundant smooth correlates rather than the brief physical events that determine the target. We call this failure temporal credit dilution. It is not exposed by the training loss and is not removed by standard physics-informed residuals, because the error lies in where the global readout assigns functional credit. We introduce Credit-in-Event, an interface-level probe for measuring how much pooled credit lands on event steps, and prove in closed form that a pooled linear reader routes credit to a spurious background channel as the event fraction shrinks. We then propose CREST, a training-free and label-free readout that estimates a transient event core from learned features and re-anchors the pooled representation through event-versus-rest contrast. Across simulated gear and impact systems, recurrent and attention encoders, and public bearing vibration data, CREST reduces out-of-distribution error while restoring event credit. Ablations show that stable-step selection and receptive-field shrinking fail, confirming that the gain comes from event-core credit re-anchoring rather than a generic locality or stability prior.

The transition toward software-defined vehicles concentrates an increasing share of vehicle functionality into distributed software services, where failures propagate through service dependencies and the surface symptom is often several causal hops away from the underlying defect. Existing approaches to causal root-cause analysis in such systems address this only partially: they typically reason over a single observability modality and operate in an offline, operator-driven mode that does not match the demands of continuous vehicle operation. This paper presents SDVDiag, a multimodal causal-discovery pipeline that fuses log-based and metric-based service representations into a shared embedding space before graph construction, coupled with an anomaly-driven trigger that converts the diagnostic platform from a manually operated batch tool into a continuously running online system. Evaluation on an Autonomous Valet Parking testbed shows that the multimodal pipeline produces sparser causal graphs than a metrics-only baseline (134 vs. 182 edges on average) and consistently outperforms it in edge-weighted reward against an expert knowledge graph at every stage of human-feedback refinement, showing a 2.4-fold improvement over the baseline after 60 feedback queries. An end-to-end fault-injection scenario further demonstrates that the integrated trigger correctly recovers a true root cause located two causal hops upstream of the observable symptom.

Time series prototype learning is fundamentally challenged by observational ambiguity. Discrete architectures fail to resolve this, as they lack the capacity to decouple stochastic noise from continuous dynamics. Furthermore, rigid closed-set assumptions fail to capture unseen diversity. To address these limitations, we propose a hierarchical ordinary differential equation clustering network, which utilizes neural ordinary differential equation to model latent state evolution as a continuous integral curve. This formulation enforces temporal continuity to effectively disentangle smooth feature trends from stochastic noise, while our adaptive hierarchical mechanism autonomously determines the appropriate number of prototypes without rigid prior constraints. Validated on the early link failure detection task with irregularly sampled time series, the proposed method effectively extracts underlying physical prototypes, thereby enabling robust failure detection. Our code is available at https://github.com/NJ-LNN/Hierarchical-ODE.

Can a learned model capture how faults propagate through a large-scale network and use this knowledge to causally attribute customer impact to its underlying root cause? Existing root cause analysis techniques often rely on static rules, correlation heuristics, or topology-local reasoning, which struggle to generalize in dynamic environments where faults propagate across complex physical and logical dependencies. We present NetCause, a self-supervised learning-based framework that models network incidents as graph-temporal processes and uses counterfactual simulation to rank candidate root causes. This approach produces an interpretable ranking of root cause hypotheses and integrates naturally with operator-defined mitigation and remediation actions. We train the model on over 1,500 incidents collected over six months from a leading cloud provider's production network and evaluate it on 31 expert-labeled incidents. NetCause consistently improves root cause ranking quality in the regime most relevant to operational decision-making, achieving a 16.1% accuracy improvement over a rule-based heuristic baseline. While training is computationally intensive, inference is lightweight, requiring only seconds of GPU runtime per incident (well below typical telemetry collection latencies).

In equipment operation, the implementation of fault diagnosis is essential to ensure the continuity and safety of production equipment, improve operational efficiency and reduce maintenance costs. Since sensor readings are widely used for fault diagnosis, their reliability directly affects the results of fault diagnosis. A new fault diagnosis method is proposed to address the two problems of robustness assessment and robustness optimization of fault diagnosis models. For this purpose, a reliable fault diagnosis method based on a belief rule base (BRB) considering robustness analysis is proposed. Firstly, the robustness analysis of the BRB model is carried out systematically. Secondly, three robustness constraint strategies are proposed to optimize the robustness of the BRB fault diagnosis model. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed model is verified by taking the fault diagnosis of WD615 diesel engine and Case Western Reserve University bearings as an example, and the experiments show that the proposed model improves both accuracy and robustness.

Data-driven Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) uses time-varying condition-monitoring data to diagnose system states and estimate remaining useful life in engineered assets. These tasks are central to maintenance planning, but industrial PHM data are often fragmented, partially observed, and poorly labeled, which hinders supervised learning. Foundation models offer a route toward reusable predictive systems, yet most time-series foundation models are designed for forecasting and assume long, coherent, regularly sampled sequences. To address this gap, we propose a framework for applying Tabular Foundation Models to industrial time series using in-context learning, and we evaluate them on a variety of PHM tasks. By converting raw unit-level signals into tabular rows, we show that these models perform well across multiple tasks - including prognostics, and diagnostics - and are highly data efficient. We compare them directly with sequence models, transformer baselines, and gradient-boosted trees under a common evaluation protocol. The results indicate that tabular foundation models achieve the best average ranks across prognostic and diagnostic tasks. Our findings further show that PFN-based models are competitive in low-data regimes, that temporal context can be preserved in the tabular representation, and that performance depends on representative context construction under subsampling. These results demonstrate that tabular foundation models provide a practical and general interface for heterogeneous PHM problems.

LLM serving frameworks are quickly evolving with a complex software stack and a vast number of optimizations. The rapid development process can introduce silent errors where output quality silently degrades without any explicit error signals. Diagnosing silent errors is notoriously difficult due to the substantial semantic gap between the high-level symptoms and the low-level root causes. We observe that diagnosis of silent errors can be effectively framed as a differential debugging problem by leveraging the existence of semantically correct reference implementations. We propose Ekka, an automated diagnosis system that identifies root causes by systematically aligning and comparing intermediate execution states between a target and a reference framework. We constructed a benchmark of real-world silent errors from popular serving frameworks, where Ekka shows 80% pass@1 diagnosis accuracy and 88% pass@5 diagnosis accuracy, outperforming state-of-the-art systems. Ekka also diagnoses 4 new silent errors from serving frameworks, all of which have been confirmed by the developers.

Large language models often generate code with bugs. Existing methods rely on feedback signals such as test failures and self-critiques to iteratively refine the generated code. Such signals are either too coarse-grained or too high-level, which is not sufficient to inform the model where to fix the bug. In this work, we present Flare, an iterative framework with a lightweight diagnostic model that predicts line-level suspiciousness signals for bug localization and code refinement. Given the inherent uncertainty of diagnostic predictions, Flare searches over the top-k suspicious regions and selects the best candidate according to execution outcomes. Experiments on LiveCodeBench and BigCodeBench with five base LLMs show that, even without candidate search (k=1), Flare outperforms the strongest baseline with an absolute improvement from 1.72% to 7.42%. Furthermore, searching over 10 candidates yields an average improvement of 8.50% compared with no candidate search. When evaluated in isolation, our lightweight diagnostic model achieves the best performance compared with recent fault localization methods, demonstrating that it can provide reliable fine-grained guidance for code refinement.

Orchestrating Large Language Models into Multi-Agent Systems (LLM-MAS) has unlocked remarkable reasoning capabilities, yet emergent failures and hallucinations that resist characterisation block their deployment in safety-critical domains -- a gap made legally untenable by emerging AI regulation. Existing evaluation paradigms share a common flaw: centralised judgment creates single points of failure and demands domain-specific expertise. Here we present POIROT, a protocol that repurposes a system's own agents as its diagnostic layer, leveraging the epistemic diversity already present in the architecture. Across evaluated settings, POIROT outperforms single-LLM evaluator baselines, with gains that scale with problem complexity (OR = 1.60, $p = 0.008$), agent count, and fault dimensionality, persisting under compound fault conditions. These results demonstrate that safety oversight need not be externalised: the agents executing a role carry sufficient collective intelligence to audit it. We release POIROT as an open-source library alongside BLAME, a benchmark for fault attribution in safety-critical multi-agent systems.

Training Variational Quantum Circuits (VQCs) under Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) constraints introduces severe computational limitations: classical statevector simulation memory scales exponentially ($\mathcal{O}(2^n)$), and global cost functions suffer from barren plateaus where gradient variance decays exponentially ($\mathcal{O}(1/2^n)$). This paper introduces and evaluates the Quantum Algorithm for Distributed Reduction of Entanglements (QADR), a hybrid quantum-classical machine learning framework that decomposes a global $n$-qubit VQC into localized sub-circuits operating approximately within the causal light cones of individual target qubits. QADR reduces classical simulation memory scaling from $\mathcal{O}(2^n)$ to $\mathcal{O}(n \cdot 2^{2d+1})$ for a light cone radius $d$, while naturally mitigating global barren plateaus. We benchmark QADR against standard global VQCs, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and two customized classical parameter-matched neural networks (CANN and PMNN) on the MNIST dataset and the high-dimensional NASA IMS wind turbine drivetrain diagnostic task. QADR demonstrates excellent scalability, operating successfully at $n_{\text{features}}=2000$ where standard global VQCs crash due to memory exhaustion, while matching or exceeding the performance of optimized classical architectures.

Network faults propagate layer by layer along topology and protocol dependencies, yet operations systems typically observe only symptomatic alerts at the tail end of propagation chains, where distinct root-cause faults may produce highly similar end-point symptoms. Existing approaches, whether rule-based, machine learning (ML)-based, or large language model (LLM)-based, fundamentally map the alert set to a diagnosis in a single pass and are structurally incapable of resolving this end-point ambiguity. This paper proposes PropLLM, which is the first to integrate the hop-by-hop scene reconstruction paradigm with the generative reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Starting from end-point alerts, PropLLM traces back hop-by-hop along the propagation path, retrieving verifiable factual evidence from a dual-layer knowledge graph (KG) at each hop, while the proposed Temporal Causal Propagation Attention (TCPA) mechanism encodes known topological causal priors directly into the attention computation to guide the model along the correct causal direction, ultimately localizing the root cause and determining the fault type through a fully evidenced causal chain. On a real-world Wi-Fi multimodal fault dataset, PropLLM improves fault type diagnosis accuracy by 3.9% and root cause localization accuracy by 4.7% over the strongest baseline, while reducing the hallucination rate by 50.8%. Supplementary experiments on the TeleLogs 5G dataset further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method across different network scenarios.

Progress in Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) is hindered by the lack of standardized and reusable evaluation practices across tasks, datasets, and application domains. Reported results are often difficult to reproduce and compare, as key protocol choices, such as data splits, preprocessing, label alignment, temporal windowing, and metrics, are often implicit or implemented ad hoc. We introduce \picid, a modular evaluation infrastructure that formalizes the PHM evaluation pipeline as an explicit, executable, and reproducible protocol. Through well-defined abstractions, \picid enforces deterministic, leakage-safe dataset construction while remaining flexible across diverse PHM settings. The framework supports fault detection, diagnostics, and prognostics through a unified interface and can be extended to new datasets and model classes without violating protocol invariants. By standardizing data contracts and evaluation boundaries, \picid also enables fair cross-task comparisons across diagnostics (classification) and prognostics (regression), allowing identical model families to be evaluated consistently across heterogeneous settings. We demonstrate \picid through an empirical evaluation of thirteen models on twelve datasets spanning batteries, bearings, turbofan engines, hydraulics, filtration systems, and buildings. This work establishes a reusable foundation for standardized, fair and reproducible evaluation in PHM.

CI failure logs are large (median 5k lines, max 200k in this corpus) and noisy. Coding agents that try to debug them depend on an upstream tool to reduce the log to a manageable context, but the field has had no public empirical comparison of which reductions preserve enough evidence for downstream LLM diagnosis. We introduce LogDx-CI, a benchmark that compares 11 context-reduction tools (raw, tail, grep, three RTK modes, two real LLM map-reduce summarizers, three hybrid routers) on 35 real GitHub Actions failure cases, scored by 3 LLM debugger families (Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, OpenAI gpt-5-mini) plus a Sonnet 4.6 tool-using agent. We report three load-bearing findings. (1)~Hybrid grep+tail routers dominate the cost-quality Pareto frontier; the top two methods score 0.670 / 0.666 at $\sim$ $0.03 per case, same-ballpark quality as standalone grep at $4.5\times$ fewer tokens. (2)~In the agent-loop regime, the quality range across reduction tools collapses $7\times$ (single-shot spread 0.42 $\to$ agent-loop spread 0.059); the agent rescues weak contexts via follow-up tool calls. However, cost differences persist: weak contexts force the agent to issue 2--4$\times$ more tool calls to recover. (3)~A cross-family LLM-summary pair (gpt-5-mini summarizer feeding a Claude Haiku debugger) beats the same-family pair by $+0.071$ averaged across four diagnoser variants, falsifying the self-call-bias hypothesis on this task. The gpt-5-mini summarizer is also the agent-loop #1 method (score 0.749) at $0.37$ tool-calls per case and $10\times$ lower reducer cost than the Haiku summarizer ($0.18 vs $1.75 per case). All data, code, per-case bundles, and reproducibility infrastructure are public.

Data streams in real-world industrial scenarios often contain transitional operating conditions that are uncovered during offline training, leading to significant distribution shifts. To bridge the gap between static offline models and dynamic online data, a novel asymmetric adaptation-based fault diagnosis method is proposed in this paper. Specifically, in the offline stage, we employ domain generalization techniques to extract domain-invariant features from multiple stable conditions and construct robust normalized fault prototypes as reference anchors. Subsequently, during online inference, we design an online test-time adaptation method based on a periodic prototype re-projection mechanism to dynamically update prototype positions. Furthermore, we utilize the geometric distribution derived from anchors to guide the updates of classifiers and adopt an asymmetric learning rate strategy for the feature extractor and classifier. The proposed approach ensures rapid adaptation to new transitional conditions while preserving the discriminative power inherited from the offline domain generalization initialization. Experimental results demonstrate that this mechanism effectively leverages offline generalized knowledge to guide online inference, significantly improving robustness in non-stationary environments.

AI agents deployed into SRE workflows currently derive their understanding of environment state from raw observability telemetry at query time, paying a semantic-interpretation tax in tokens, latency, and inferential reliability. We propose Causely, a causal intelligence layer that maintains a structured representation of environment topology, attribute dependencies, and causal relationships that are anchroed to a ontological representation of the managed environment. Causely transforms raw telemetry into a live, queryable model providing the semantic and causal foundation AI agents require to diagnose, evaluate impact, and act safely in production. We evaluate this value proposition through a benchmark study conducted in a controlled setting with injected faults in a 24-microservice OpenTelemetry demo application. Our experiments compare four agent configurations (Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, HolmesGPT with Sonnet and Gemini backends). Experiments are run with and without access to Causely under two scenarios: an active incident and a healthy baseline. On the active-fault scenario, causal grounding reduces mean time-to-diagnosis by 63%, mean token consumption by 60%, and mean tool-call count by 78%, compressing the investigation footprint by 4.8$\times$ and lowering direct API cost per run by 57%; root-cause-diagnosis accuracy rises from 75% to 100%.

LLM-based root cause analysis (RCA) agents have recently emerged as a promising paradigm for incident diagnosis in microservice AIOps. However, their reliability remains fragile: an error in early evidence collection, hypothesis formulation, or causal analysis can propagate through the reasoning trace and eventually corrupt the final diagnosis. In this paper, we present STAR, a Stage-attributed Triage and Repair framework for repairing erroneous RCA traces. STAR explicitly decomposes an RCA workflow into four structured stages, namely Evidence Package (EP), Hypothesis Set (HS), Analysis Structure (AS), and Decision Report (DR), and treats agent failure as a stage-localizable reasoning bug rather than a monolithic end-to-end error. Built on top of LangGraph, STAR performs stage-wise auditing, budget-aware Fast/Slow Routing, decisive stage localization via counterfactual candidate evaluation, and stage-specific patch-and-replay repair. We evaluate STAR on a public large-scale benchmark and a real-world production dataset, using two RCA agent workflows and three foundation models. Experimental results show that STAR consistently improves both root cause localization and fault type classification over strong baselines. Moreover, STAR identifies the decisive faulty stage with high accuracy, repairs most initially incorrect traces within one or two replay rounds, and benefits substantially from both Fast/Slow Routing and counterfactual stage evaluation. These results suggest that explicitly modeling where an RCA agent fails is an effective path toward reliable, debuggable, and self-repairing agentic RCA systems.

Grey failures in the computing continuum produce ambiguous overlapping symptoms that existing approaches fail to diagnose reliably, either due to a lack of causal awareness or acting under high epistemic uncertainty, risking destructive interventions. This paper presents an uncertainty-aware resilience micro-agent for causal observability (AURORA), a lightweight framework for diagnosing and mitigating grey failures in edge-tier environments. The framework employs parallel micro-agents that integrate the free-energy principle, causal do-calculus, and localized causal state-graphs to support counterfactual root-cause analysis within each fault's Markov blanket. Restricting inference to causally relevant variables reduces computational overhead while preserving diagnostic fidelity. AURORA further introduces a dual-gated execution mechanism that authorizes remediation only when causal confidence is high and predicted epistemic uncertainty is bounded; otherwise, it abstains from local intervention and escalates the diagnostic payload to the fog tier. Our experiments demonstrate that AURORA outperforms baselines, achieving a 0% destructive action rate, while maintaining 62.0% repair accuracy and a 3ms mean time to repair.

Software engineering agents are increasingly deployed in evaluable engineering environments, yet post-failure recovery remains costly, manual, and ad hoc. Existing systems expose traces or generate follow-up feedback, but they do not convert heterogeneous runtime evidence into grounded, bounded recovery guidance for a subsequent attempt. We present PROBE, a failure-anchored framework for structured recovery in software engineering agents. PROBE organizes failed-run telemetry into structured evidence, structured diagnosis, and bounded recovery guidance through a Telemetry Layer, a Diagnosis Layer, and a Guidance Gate. The Telemetry Layer preserves fine-grained runtime signals, the Diagnosis Layer fuses cross-signal evidence into grounded diagnoses, and the Guidance Gate produces diagnosis-derived guidance only when it is evidence-grounded, actionable, and within the scope of agent-side behavior. We evaluate PROBE across three settings: repository-level software repair, enterprise workflow recovery, and AIOps service mitigation. On 257 initially unresolved cases, PROBE achieves 65.37% Top-1 diagnosis accuracy and a 21.79% recovery rate, outperforming the strongest non-PROBE baseline by 43.58 and 12.45 percentage points. The results reveal a diagnosis-recovery gap: accurate diagnosis is necessary but insufficient unless translated into bounded guidance that a subsequent attempt can execute and verify. Beyond controlled evaluation, a Microsoft IcM prototype shows that PROBE can attach as a non-intrusive side channel to existing service-diagnosis workflows without changing the agent policy, toolset, or execution budget. These results suggest that telemetry-grounded, failure-anchored recovery can improve post-failure recoverability under realistic engineering constraints.

Systolic arrays are the dominant compute fabric for neural network inference. Prior work has addressed column-level fault detection efficiently with uniform test patterns, but row-level (PE-level) fault localization within a faulty column remains open without resorting to hardware redundancy. The fundamental obstacle is that uniform test inputs destroy per-row signatures: any test that activates every row equally cannot distinguish which row is the source of an observed deviation. In this paper, we propose a lightweight, purely algorithmic remedy based on coprime test vectors. By assigning pairwise coprime integers as test-input entries, a permanent weight-register fault produces a deviation whose divisibility signature uniquely identifies the faulty row. Under a general bounded error model, a single test pass localizes the faulty row with high probability. This error model covers a broader class of faults than what prior dataflow-aware testing work has primarily emphasized. When one round is insufficient, a second pass using a ratio computation achieves exact localization; for the special case of single-bit errors, odd coprime entries guarantee exact localization in one round. For INT16 arithmetic, a single test pass covers array sizes up to $256{\times}256$ with localization probability above $0.98$, at a test cost under $1\%$ of one inference GEMM tile.

Large language model (LLM) agents execute multi-step tasks, but terminal verdicts arrive too late for intervention. Agent traces mix messages, tool calls, and feedback, making it difficult to learn failure signals from terminal outcomes. Even if a model learns to predict failure from execution prefixes, its predictions alone cannot show which actions, feedback, or unmet conditions need inspection. Existing work studies online failure prediction and diagnosis from completed trajectories, yet few methods connect timely warning to a compact symbolic model of execution behavior. We introduce PrefixGuard, a neuro-symbolic method that uses learned events to connect online failure warning with finite-state execution diagnosis. A gated recurrent unit (GRU) predicts horizon-specific failure risk from these events. A deterministic finite automaton (DFA) organizes their histories into compact risk-labeled paths for replay and rule-monitor composition. Across all 24 benchmark--horizon settings, PrefixGuard exceeds the strongest evaluated baseline in mean test area under the precision--recall curve (AUPRC). Average gains range from 12.0 to 21.9 percentage points. At a nominal 10% FAR budget, averaged test recall spans 56.1%--93.0% across benchmarks. On one frozen $τ^2$-Bench DFA, model checking five specifications identifies violations in 21 of 265 benchmark-successful runs.

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly applied to network troubleshooting, but root-cause localization on public benchmarks remains well below practical deployment thresholds. We argue this is because existing agents do not encode the disciplined, layer-by-layer methodology that human network engineers use, and instead rely on free-form deliberation that conflates evidence acquisition with hypothesis commitment. We present SADE (Symptom-Aware Diagnostic Escalation), an agent that encodes the classical Cisco troubleshooting methodology as an explicit policy. SADE pairs a phase-gated diagnostic workflow, which separates evidence acquisition from hypothesis commitment, with a routed library of fault-family skills and high-yield diagnostic helpers. On a held-out 523 incident set of the public NIKA benchmark covering eleven unseen scenarios, SADE improves root-cause F1 by 37 percentage points over a ReAct + GPT-5 baseline; a model-controlled comparison against the same Claude Sonnet backend without the SADE policy attributes 22 of those points to the diagnostic policy alone, showing that the gain is not a side-effect of the model upgrade.

Mechanical equipment forms the critical backbone of modern industrial production, yet domain shift severely limits the generalization of deep learning based fault diagnosis models across different equipment and operating conditions.Inspired by the success of foundation models in achieving zero-shotgeneralization, we propose YOTOnet (You Only Train Once), a novel architecture specifically designed for cross-domain fault diagnosis in mechanical equipment.YOTOnet comprises three core components: (1) a physics-aware Invariant Feature Distiller that extracts domain-agnostic representations using multi-scale dilated convolutions and FFT-based time-frequency fusion,(2) Domain-Conditioned Sparse Experts (DC-MoE) that adaptively route inputs to specialized processors via learned gating without external meta-data, and (3) a dual-head classification system with auxiliary supervision.Extensive validation on five public bearing datasets (CWRU, MFPT, XJTU,OTTAWA, HUST) through 30 cross-dataset protocols demonstrates the superiority of YOTOnet compared with other state-of-the-art methods. Critically, we observe a clear scaling effect-average test F1 improves from 0.5339(1 training dataset) to 0.705 (4 datasets), with a clear gain when moving from 3 to 4 datasets. These findings provide empirical evidence that foundation model principles can enable robust, train-once deployment for industrial fault diagnosis.

Transformers now underpin critical AI systems across industry and research. Yet their faults can silently alter model behavior without runtime errors, and existing techniques offer little support for tracing these failures to their component and root cause. Such faults evade detection because loss and numerical values stay normal, and the visible symptom rarely identifies the component responsible. We present DEFault++, a hierarchical learning-based technique that first detects a fault, then identifies the affected component, and finally the cause within it, helping developers effectively debug transformer models. DEFault++ organizes component-level runtime measurements with a Fault Propagation Graph (FPG), a structural prior over the architecture's dependency paths, and reports the evidence behind each diagnosis. To train and evaluate it, we construct DEFault-bench, a benchmark of 5,556 labeled runs from mutation testing across seven models, nine tasks, and both encoder and decoder architectures. DEFault++ improves fault detection over four prior techniques, reaching an F1 of 0.826--0.909, and in a developer study with 21 participants, it raises repair accuracy from 57.1% to 83.3%. These results show that transformer fault diagnosis benefits from component-level measurements and architecture-aware reasoning rather than model-level behavior alone, and DEFault-bench provides a foundation for further research on transformer fault diagnosis.

In many cyber-physical systems, especially in critical applications such as aeroplanes, data to train anomaly detection and diagnosis algorithms is lacking due to data protection issues and partial observability. To combat this inherent lack of data, we introduce a high-fidelity, physics-informed co-simulation of a common aircraft main-fuel-pump system modelled in MATLAB/Simulink Simscape Fluids. We also describe its generated time-series data with health and fault mode annotations. To show feasibility of our benchmark, we apply an unsupervised Recurrent Variational Autoencoder (RNN-VAE) for anomaly detection and a SOM-VAE for operating mode discretization, trained to separate healthy and faulty conditions.

Fault diagnosis under unseen operating conditions remains highly challenging when labeled data are scarce. Semi-supervised domain generalization fault diagnosis (SSDGFD) provides a practical solution by jointly exploiting labeled and unlabeled source domains. However, existing methods still suffer from two coupled limitations. First, pseudo-labels for unlabeled domains are typically generated primarily from knowledge learned on the labeled source domain, which neglects domain-specific geometric discrepancies and thus induces systematic cross-domain pseudo-label bias. Second, unlabeled samples are commonly handled with a hard accept-or-discard strategy, where rigid thresholding causes imbalanced sample utilization across domains, while hard-label assignment for uncertain samples can easily introduce additional noise. To address these issues, we propose a unified framework termed domain-aware hierarchical contrastive learning (DAHCL) for SSDGFD. Specifically, DAHCL introduces a domain-aware learning (DAL) module to explicitly capture source-domain geometric characteristics and calibrate pseudo-label predictions across heterogeneous source domains, thereby mitigating cross-domain bias in pseudo-label generation. In addition, DAHCL develops a hierarchical contrastive learning (HCL) module that combines dynamic confidence stratification with fuzzy contrastive supervision, enabling uncertain samples to contribute to representation learning without relying on unreliable hard labels. In this way, DAHCL jointly improves the quality of supervision and the utilization of unlabeled samples. Furthermore, to better reflect practical industrial scenarios, we incorporate engineering noise into the SSDGFD evaluation protocol. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that...

Semiconductor failure analysis (FA) requires engineers to examine inspection images, correlate equipment telemetry, consult historical defect records, and write structured reports, a process that can consume several hours of expert time per case. We present SemiFA, an agentic multi-modal framework that autonomously generates structured FA reports from semiconductor inspection images in under one minute. SemiFA decomposes FA into a four-agent LangGraph pipeline: a DefectDescriber that classifies and narrates defect morphology using DINOv2 and LLaVA-1.6, a RootCauseAnalyzer that fuses SECS/GEM equipment telemetry with historically similar defects retrieved from a Qdrant vector database, a SeverityClassifier that assigns severity and estimates yield impact, and a RecipeAdvisor that proposes corrective process adjustments. A fifth node assembles a PDF report. We introduce SemiFA-930, a dataset of 930 annotated semiconductor defect images paired with structured FA narratives across nine defect classes, drawn from procedural synthesis, WM-811K, and MixedWM38. Our DINOv2-based classifier achieves 92.1% accuracy on 140 validation images (macro F1 = 0.917), and the full pipeline produces complete FA reports in 48 seconds on an NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40 GB GPU. A GPT-4o judge ablation across four modality conditions demonstrates that multi-modal fusion improves root cause reasoning by +0.86 composite points (1-5 scale) over an image-only baseline, with equipment telemetry as the more load-bearing modality. To our knowledge, SemiFA is the first system to integrate SECS/GEM equipment telemetry into a vision-language model pipeline for autonomous FA report generation.

Integration testing is critical for the quality and reliability of complex software systems. However, diagnosing their failures presents significant challenges due to the massive volume, unstructured nature, and heterogeneity of logs they generate. These result in a high cognitive load, low signal-to-noise ratio, and make diagnosis difficult and time-consuming. Developers complain about these difficulties consistently and report spending substantially more time diagnosing integration test failures compared to unit test failures. To address these shortcomings, we introduce Auto-Diagnose, a novel diagnosis tool that leverages LLMs to help developers efficiently determine the root cause of integration test failures. Auto-Diagnose analyzes failure logs, produces concise summaries with the most relevant log lines, and is integrated into Critique, Google's internal code review system, providing contextual and in-time assistance. Based on our case studies, Auto-Diagnose is highly effective. A manual evaluation conducted on 71 real-world failures demonstrated 90.14% accuracy in diagnosing the root cause. Following its Google-wide deployment, Auto-Diagnose was used across 52, 635 distinct failing tests. User feedback indicated that the tool was deemed "Not helpful" in only 5.8% of cases, and it was ranked #14 in helpfulness among 370 tools that post findings in Critique. Finally, user interviews confirmed the perceived usefulness of Auto-Diagnose and positive reception of integrating automatic diagnostic assistance into existing workflows. We conclude that LLMs are highly successful in diagnosing integration test failures due to their capacity to process and summarize complex textual data. Integrating such AI-powered tooling automatically into developers' daily workflows is perceived positively, with the tool's accuracy remaining a critical factor in shaping developer perception and adoption.

Hybrid approaches that combine data-driven learning with physics-based insight have shown promise for improving the reliability of industrial condition monitoring. This work develops a hybrid condition monitoring framework that integrates primary sensor measurements, lagged temporal features, and physics-informed residuals derived from nominal surrogate models. Two hybrid integration strategies are examined. The first is a feature-level fusion approach that augments the input space with residual and temporal information. The second is a model-level ensemble approach in which machine learning classifiers trained on different feature types are combined at the decision level. Both hybrid approaches of the condition monitoring framework are evaluated on a continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) benchmark using several machine learning models and ensemble configurations. Both feature-level and model-level hybridization improve diagnostic accuracy relative to single-source baselines, with the best model-level ensemble achieving a 2.9% improvement over the best baseline ensemble. To assess predictive reliability, conformal prediction is applied to quantify coverage, prediction-set size, and abstention behavior. The results show that hybrid integration enhances uncertainty management, producing smaller and well-calibrated prediction sets at matched coverage levels. These findings demonstrate that lightweight physics-informed residuals, temporal augmentation, and ensemble learning can be combined effectively to improve both accuracy and decision reliability in nonlinear industrial systems.

Fault intensity diagnosis (FID) plays a pivotal role in intelligent manufacturing while neglecting dependencies among target classes hinders its practical deployment. This paper introduces a novel and general framework with deep hierarchical knowledge loss (DHK) to achieve hierarchical consistent representation and prediction. We develop a novel hierarchical tree loss to enable a holistic mapping of same-attribute classes, leveraging tree-based positive and negative hierarchical knowledge constraints. We further design a focal hierarchical tree loss to enhance its extensibility and devise two adaptive weighting schemes based on tree height. In addition, we propose a group tree triplet loss with hierarchical dynamic margin by incorporating hierarchical group concepts and tree distance to model boundary structural knowledge across classes. The joint two losses significantly improve the recognition of subtle faults. Extensive experiments are performed on four real-world datasets from various industrial domains (three cavitation datasets from SAMSON AG and one publicly available dataset) for FID, all showing superior results and outperforming recent state-of-the-art FID methods.

Enterprise IT support interactions are fundamentally diagnostic: effective resolution requires iterative evidence gathering from ambiguous user reports to identify an underlying root cause. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) provides grounding through historical cases, standard multi-turn RAG systems lack explicit diagnostic state and therefore struggle to accumulate evidence and resolve competing hypotheses across turns. We introduce DQA, a diagnostic question-answering framework that maintains persistent diagnostic state and aggregates retrieved cases at the level of root causes rather than individual documents. DQA combines conversational query rewriting, retrieval aggregation, and state-conditioned response generation to support systematic troubleshooting under enterprise latency and context constraints. We evaluate DQA on 150 anonymized enterprise IT support scenarios using a replay-based protocol. Averaged over three independent runs, DQA achieves a 78.7% success rate under a trajectory-level success criterion, compared to 41.3% for a multi-turn RAG baseline, while reducing average turns from 8.4 to 3.9.