Language Model-Based Control
Overview
The field studies both how language models can control external systems and how controllers can regulate a model’s own behavior and outputs. Common designs use an LLM for high-level planning, intent interpretation, or code generation, paired with faster controllers such as MPC, reinforcement learning, PID, and deterministic tools; retrieval, world models, and formal safety shields help ground or check proposed actions. Researchers evaluate these systems in settings such as robot manipulation, autonomous driving, traffic signals, networks, HVAC, and software agents, using benchmarks including CARLA, SUMO, LIBERO, nuPlan, and OSWorld as well as some hardware tests. Results show useful planning and adaptation, but reliable deployment remains limited by latency, unsafe or incorrect actions, and gaps between simulation performance and robust real-world control.
Latest papers
180 papers29 papers in the last four weeks, up 71% on the four weeks before. 0.2% of all new papers.
Toward Full Autonomous Laboratory Instrumentation Control with Large Language Models
AI-driven Intent-Based Networking Approach for Self-configuration of Next Generation Networks
Describe-Then-Act: Proactive Agent Steering via Distilled Language-Action World Models
PowerLens: Taming LLM Agents for Safe and Personalized Mobile Power Management
Robotic Agentic Platform for Intelligent Electric Vehicle Disassembly
WASD: Locating Critical Neurons as Sufficient Conditions for Explaining and Controlling LLM Behavior
Proactive Rejection and Grounded Execution: A Dual-Stage Intent Analysis Paradigm for Safe and Efficient AIoT Smart Homes
Reflection-Driven Self-Improving Language Model Agents for Adaptive RAN Slicing
LLMs for Text-Based Exploration and Navigation Under Partial Observability
UP/RIGHT/DOWN/LEFT. Nine contemporary LLMs ranging from open/proprietary, dense / Mixture of Experts and instruction- vs. reasoning-tuned are evaluated on two tasks across three layouts of increasing difficulty: Exploration (maximising revealed cells) and Navigation (reach the goal on the shortest path). The experimental results are evaluated on quantitative metrics including success rate, efficiency such as normalised coverage and path length vs. oracle as well as qualitative analysis. Reasoning-tuned models reliably complete navigation across all layouts, yet remain less efficient than oracle paths. Few-shot demonstrations in the prompt chiefly help these Reasoning-tuned models by reducing invalid moves and shortening paths, while classic dense instruction models remain inconsistent. We observe characteristic action priors (UP/RIGHT) that can induce looping under partial observability. Overall, training regimen and test-time deliberation predict control ability better than raw parameter count. These findings suggest lightweight hybridisation with classical online planners as a practical route to deployable partial map systems.