Pareto Frontier

A UAV mobile edge computing (MEC) fleet trades energy against delay, and its schedules form a Pareto front; we call a scheduler operable when the fleet can be asked for any point on that front at run time. We propose PrefDT, to the best of our knowledge the first preference-conditioned Decision Transformer for the problem of joint trajectory, association and offloading scheduling. Its idea comes from language modeling: we hand the model the desired trade-off as an input, such that a single model only needs to be trained once offline to return any desired point on the curve in one rollout. The fleet's state is summarized by attention pooling with a per-user bypass, so the scheduler keeps working when user reports are lost. The energy target is a running budget decremented by what the fleet actually spends. As a result, when wind or load pushes consumption off the plan, the policy can track the difference and hold its budget. Because no corpus of preference-labeled flights exists, we design a distillation pipeline and build the corpus by ourselves. In simulation against 26 method variants, PrefDT produces the best trade-off curve of any learned method and holds its energy budget to within 0.6% when propulsion cost rises by half in mid-flight.

Safe control of humanoid robots remains challenging due to their high-dimensional dynamics, contact-rich interactions, and sensitivity to disturbances. Although reinforcement learning has enabled effective locomotion and motion tracking, learned policies can still generate unsafe actions that lead to instability or falls. In this work, we propose residual reinforcement learning as an implicit safety-filtering mechanism for safe humanoid control. Instead of relying on a single nominal policy to simultaneously balance performance, safety, and robustness, we decouple performance and safety. The nominal policy focuses solely on task performance, while a residual policy learns safety corrections. This decoupling leads to a better performance--safety Pareto trade-off and avoids the need for careful tuning of multiple competing reward terms within a single policy training. We show that the residual policy can act as an implicit safety filter.

Co-work agents execute complex workflows that combine information gathering, tool use, coding, and file manipulation across many model invocations. Because cost and latency accumulate over the full episode, their practical value depends not only on peak capability but also on how efficiently that capability is delivered. Yet many steps in everyday work emphasize state tracking, coordination, recovery, and follow-through rather than frontier-scale reasoning. We present Occamy-1.0, a cost-efficient co-work model obtained by further training the post-trained Qwen3.6-35B-A3B checkpoint. We construct execution-grounded data and environments, capture replayable long-horizon trajectories across multiple harnesses, and use staged post-training to develop and consolidate complementary execution capabilities. Across a broad suite of co-work benchmarks, Occamy-1.0 is consistently among the strongest comparably sized models and remains competitive with substantially larger frontier systems on several tasks. Under our stated evaluation and pricing protocol, its aggregate performance across four representative benchmarks places it at the low-cost knee of the observed cost--performance Pareto frontier. Supporting evaluations in tool calling, coding, and instruction following further show that this specialization preserves broad agentic capability. We release the model weights and a subset of the training data to support research on practical co-work agents and agentic post-training.

Offline multi-objective optimization requires not only moving the objective vectors of candidate designs toward the Pareto front, but also distributing them effectively along it. Generative methods have recently emerged as a natural approach because they learn a distribution over feasible designs while allowing generation to be steered toward promising designs. Existing methods, however, largely retain classical sample-wise guidance strategies, leaving the distribution-level modeling capability of generative methods underused. We propose ParetoTransport, a training-free guidance method for pre-trained flow-matching models that explicitly specifies and refines a population-level distribution in objective space. ParetoTransport guides a flow-matching sampler to iteratively transport the empirical offline distribution toward the Pareto front, with Wasserstein matching to intermediate proxy distributions. This directly controls distributional displacement and mass allocation along the front. We establish a convergence result and demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on standard offline MOO benchmarks, extending recent evaluations beyond hypervolume to generational distance, inverted generational distance, and Wasserstein distance.

Scaling the interaction horizon-the maximum number of environment interactions per episode-improves LLM agents on long-horizon tasks, and curriculum-based methods that progressively expand the horizon outperform fixed-horizon alternatives. However, existing schedules are open-loop: they monotonically increase the horizon until a manually specified maximum, with no mechanism to detect when further expansion stops helping. We propose the effective interaction frontier hypothesis: a dynamic boundary beyond which additional interactions yield diminishing returns while cost grows linearly. We then introduce Elastic Horizon, a closed-loop controller that tracks this boundary via the 90th percentile of successful trajectory lengths. On AppWorld and BFCL, fixed-horizon sweeps reveal clear saturation plateaus; Elastic Horizon stabilizes the horizon inside the saturation band from both under- and over-capacity initializations, attains the best success rates across 7B and 14B backbones, and saves up to 25% of per-step trajectory tokens. Our work shifts the paradigm from how to scale interaction horizons to when to stop scaling.

Interactive simulations increasingly evaluate policies in markets populated by language-model agents. Their outputs can look economic---prices, profits, consumer surplus, and welfare---without instantiating the behavior named in the claim. We audit this risk in a multi-turn buyer--seller testbed for configurable hotel transactions. An initial implementation reported welfare gains from two marketplace guardrails of +87.4, +35.0, and +28.8 across a Qwen2.5 1.5B--14B ladder. It also gave guarded and unguarded agents different offer schemas and choice procedures. Holding the schema and buyer chooser fixed changes the paired contrasts to +7.2, -13.9, and +23.8. The four largest 14B single-generation effects averaged +229; after three generations per profile-condition, they averaged +37.6 (95% bootstrap interval [-34.2, 109.3]), while generation residuals account for 49.9% of variation in this post-hoc probe. A seller-incentive check is non-monotone: increasing profit pressure produces less profit than the default seller prompt. Scripted positive controls show why this matters. A profit-maximizing seller already attains first-best welfare, so guardrails mostly redistribute and reduce welfare; they create welfare only when the seller is explicitly programmed to force inefficient bundles. We contribute a construct-validity contract separating incentive validity, protocol isolation, stochastic stability, and welfare accounting, and returning INVALID or INCONCLUSIVE before substantive policy claims. In our case, the original estimate is INVALID under protocol isolation, while the controlled study remains INCONCLUSIVE under incentive validity and stochastic stability. The case does not show that guardrails are ineffective; it shows their apparent value is unidentified until the simulated agents and protocol pass these checks.

Scenario optimization, conformal prediction, and related distribution-free certification methods use finite samples to construct decisions or prediction sets with violation-risk guarantees for fresh observations. In several classical settings, the conditional violation risk follows an exact beta law, whose tail has a beta-binomial representation and whose parameter is a support, calibration, or compression dimension. This paper identifies the deterministic boundary mechanism behind these formulas and derives the corresponding law when the observed boundary size is random. A decision rule is represented by an acceptance set for future observations, together with a boundary map selecting the sample points responsible for that set. The resulting pair is called a {\em proper projective boundary scheme} when held-out samples are accepted precisely if the full-sample boundary is retained, and accepted non-boundary samples can be deleted without changing that boundary. For every such scheme, the conditional law of the violation risk given the observed boundary size is determined by the boundary's cross-sample complexity profile. A stable profile yields the usual beta law, whereas a varying profile produces an exact profile correction. The framework covers scalar order-statistic calibration, support-reconstructive scenario programs, cascaded support-removal certificates, coordinatewise envelopes, and Pareto-frontier calibration with vector scores. It also yields conditional probabilistic certificates and a no-go result explaining why observed complexity alone is insufficient.

Consider a firm that surveys its competition for a particular agentic task and seeks to offer superior accuracy at every price point. A firm that Pareto-dominated its competitors would leave no rational customer a reason to buy elsewhere. This paper shows a path to this kind of capability by evolving multi-LLM Python agents from training pools of at most 100 examples. Given a priced menu of nine LLM endpoints; brief documentation of the task, objective, and API; a simple seed agent; and an operator-chosen per-problem cost target--usually set at an incumbent's own price--RoboPhD, an evolutionary meta-agent, evolves complete agent programs that attack the public frontiers of two semantically dissimilar tasks point by point: DS-1000 (execution-checked code generation) and PaperFindingBench (LLM-judged scientific document retrieval). On public leaderboards for each task, the evolved agents hold every Pareto-frontier slot but one, including Pareto domination of both the top-scoring and the lowest-cost competing points.

Edge AI deployment demands neural architectures that are simultaneously accurate, computationally efficient, and hardware-deployable - a challenge addressed by hardware-aware Neural Architecture Search (NAS). While recent works incorporate quantization directly into the NAS loop, these approaches expand search complexity and tightly couple architecture and quantization design. The simpler post-search quantization strategy has received little analytical attention: the effects of Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) on the NAS-discovered Pareto structure remain uncharacterised, and no framework combines quantized architecture mapping onto reconfigurable accelerators with automated hardware exploration. This paper addresses both gaps. First, a three-stage pipeline is proposed: a hardware-agnostic Pareto rank surrogate frontend on NAS-Bench-201, a quantization bridge with Pareto-aware filtering and feedback control, and an evolutionary Domain Space Exploration (DSE) backend on CGRA4ML for optimal hardware mapping. Second, an empirical study characterises how INT4 PTQ perturbs the NAS-Bench-201 Pareto space through formal stability metrics on ground-truth data for all 15,625 architectures, and demonstrates that an FP32 zero-shot surrogate outperforms a dedicated INT4-trained surrogate in Pareto space coverage across two standard search strategies.

Fractional partial differential equations describe nonlocal dynamics, but discovering them from noisy data is difficult because fractional differentiation amplifies high-frequency measurement noise and the derivative orders are unknown. We propose Weak-Pareto, which combines an adjoint-consistent weak formulation of fractional terms with Pareto-based subset selection over discrete term types and continuous fractional orders. For linear right-hand-side terms, the adjoint transfers fractional operators from measured fields to smooth test functions, replacing noise-sensitive pointwise differentiation with smoothing integration; for nonlinear terms, the noise-suppression effect is partial yet useful. Coefficients are fitted by ridge regression within a branch-aware differential-evolution search over the orders. The support size is then selected at the validation-error-complexity elbow. We show that the variance of fixed linear right-hand-side weak features vanishes under grid refinement, whereas noise amplification in pointwise fractional features increases with derivative order. Across fractional advection-diffusion, reaction-diffusion, and Burgers benchmarks, Weak-Pareto recovers parsimonious structures from clean and noisy measurements. In controlled advection-diffusion and Burgers comparisons, it retains the correct support at every tested multiplicative-noise level, whereas the unregularised strong-form counterpart largely fails once noise is introduced; this advantage persists under additive Gaussian noise. Ablations show that the weak library drives noise robustness and that continuous-order Pareto search avoids the support-selection failure of a dense fixed dictionary. On the advection-diffusion benchmark, Weak-Pareto yields more consistent operator recovery and substantially lower measured runtime than a contemporary neural baseline.

Routing each query to a cost-effective large language model (LLM) is critical for balancing quality and cost, yet most routers rely on a centralized task center to predict model performance, creating an information-risk mismatch and a scalability bottleneck as the model pool grows. We propose a market-based routing paradigm that shifts ex-ante prediction to LLM providers via a reverse auction, where providers bid with self-predicted success probabilities and execution costs. To account for inherently noisy provider predictions and center evaluations, we introduce the \textit{\textbf{E}rror-\textbf{A}ware \textbf{R}everse \textbf{A}uction \textbf{M}echanism} (EA-RAM), which explicitly models this inherent Dual Error. We prove that EA-RAM is Bayesian incentive compatible and individually rational under the Dual Error, establish sufficient conditions for center rationality, and derive an explicit welfare-loss bound. We further identify robustness effects: opposite-signed errors can cancel, vanishing-tail link functions (e.g., logistic) stabilize clear-cut cases via saturation, and extra noise smooths belief maps, reducing the gains from marginal manipulation. Experiments on simulations and real-world benchmarks show that EA-RAM is robust to the Dual Error and achieves a better cost--performance Pareto frontier than centralized baselines, with additional gains when providers contribute local information, validating its practical effectiveness.

First-order concept synthesis asks a system to infer one formula that classifies labeled objects consistently across several finite relational structures. Every candidate can be evaluated exactly, but quantified first-order formulas form a vast search space, and LLM outputs are often semantically promising without being fully correct. We introduce Hypothesis Frontier, a verifier-guided neurosymbolic framework that evaluates each LLM formula on every training object, retains the strongest verified hypothesis across rounds, and uses its remaining errors to guide subsequent generation. Symbolic processing repairs invalid formulas while remaining anchored to the LLM-generated hypothesis, and simplifies train-valid formulas without changing any training prediction. Under matched models, problem sets, and LLM-round budgets, Hypothesis Frontier solves substantially more problems than repeated original-prompt generation. After the final formulas are selected, exact simplification shortens many train-valid formulas while preserving every training prediction. Exact symbolic reasoning therefore helps both to solve more induction problems and to compress many of the resulting formulas.

Evolutionary multitasking is a recent approach that solves multiple related optimization problems within a single evolutionary run, rather than addressing each problem separately. We consider monotone submodular optimization problems with dynamic knapsack constraints and study a multitasking formulation in which all tasks share a common monotone submodular function $f$, but differ in their constraints. We focus on the case where elements within each constraint have uniform cost and show that this structure leads to small Pareto fronts in the multitasking formulation. This enables solution sharing across tasks and can improve performance compared to running standard evolutionary approaches independently, depending on the constraint regime. Using rigorous runtime analysis, we analyze the expected time until the proposed multitasking algorithms obtain a $(1 - 1/e)$-approximation for each task. Experimental results for the Maximum Coverage problem complement the theoretical analysis and provide further insight into the practical behavior of the approach across different budget settings.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which augments large language model (LLM) generation with information retrieved from databases, has become a widely used approach for knowledge-intensive applications. Modern RAG systems, however, expose many configuration choices, such as retrieval indexes, model selections, and how models invoke retrieval. Each configuration yields a different trade-off between answer quality and serving performance, making it challenging to choose the optimal setting for a specific application deployment. We present RAG-Stack, a framework for efficiently discovering quality-performance Pareto frontiers across diverse RAG applications and serving systems. RAG-Stack consists of RAG-PE, an iterative design-space exploration algorithm that selects the next RAG configuration to evaluate; RAG-IR, a workload abstraction for diverse RAG algorithms; and RAG-CM, a performance model that predicts the optimal deployment and serving performance on the given hardware. Together, these components allow RAG-Stack to search the joint algorithm-system configuration space without deploying every candidate and to transfer an existing Pareto frontier to a new serving system. Given the same number of optimization iterations across diverse datasets, the Pareto frontiers found by RAG-Stack cover 52.5% to 153.2% more of the normalized quality-performance space than those found by state-of-the-art configuration-search methods evaluated over the same RAG design space.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in complex, compound AI systems where performance hinges on the quality of prompts. Recent state-of-the-art optimizers like GEPA (Genetic-Pareto) have argued that reflective instruction evolution can outperform traditional reinforcement learning and few-shot optimization. In this work, we challenge this shift by introducing FLARE (Few-shot Learning-based Adaptive Reflective Engine), a framework that leverages advanced reflective mechanisms and a small set of few-shot reference examples to optimize instructions. We evaluate our method across a diverse suite of benchmarks -- spanning retrieval-augmented reasoning (HotPotQA, MedQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA), tool calling, and multi-label emotion classification (GoEmotions) -- using the GPT-5 series of models. Our results demonstrate that FLARE consistently outperforms GEPA, winning on every task-model pair: it achieves gains of up to +14.2 points on HotPotQA (52.2 vs. GEPA's 42.2 with GPT-5-Chat), reaches 87.0% on tool calling (vs. 81.0% for GEPA), and lifts GoEmotions micro-F1 to 52.7% (+15.3) with GPT-5.1 on the full 5408-example test split, more than doubling GEPA's +5.7 gain. Beyond raw accuracy, FLARE is also strikingly data-efficient: on GoEmotions it reaches its peak performance using as few as 100 validation examples, while remaining markedly more stable across random seeds than GEPA. Our findings suggest that while reflective instructions are powerful, the strategic optimization of few-shot learning remains a critical frontier for maximizing the potential of next-generation LLMs.

Modern machine learning pipelines increasingly rely on reusing pretrained and foundation models across downstream tasks. These pretrained models can differ not only in performance but also in how they can be used: some only provide black-box predictions, while others may permit white-box access to internal representations that can be probed or fine-tuned. When deployed to the target domain in the presence of distribution shift, no single strategy, including zero-shot application, fine-tuning, or directly training a target-specific model, is uniformly the best. In this work, we propose Frontier Learning, a framework that treats a library of candidate models spanning different training histories and access regimes as complementary sources of information rather than mutually exclusive alternatives. Frontier Learning constructs a unified target-domain feature by concatenating internal representations from white-box candidates as well as prediction outputs from black-box candidates, then fits a lightweight, regularized supervised learner on this concatenated representation using labeled target data. Because the resulting hypothesis class contains predictors obtained by zero-shot reuse, fine-tuning, and direct training as special cases, empirical risk minimization over the frontier learner is guaranteed to be no worse, on the training sample, than any individual baseline. We evaluate the framework in simulations spanning varying degrees of source-target compatibility and in two real-world distribution-shift settings: visual domain adaptation on DomainNet/VisDA and clinical mortality prediction across intensive care unit domains using MIMIC-IV-Notes. Across all settings, Frontier Learning matches or outperforms the strongest individual reuse strategy, with the largest gains arising precisely when no single baseline is reliable across the range of shift considered.

Streaming data-driven dynamic multi-objective optimization requires algorithms to track time-varying Pareto fronts using only sequential observations under concept drift. However, systematic evaluation remains difficult because real-world problems usually lack ground-truth optima, drift annotations, and controllable conditions, while existing benchmarks provide limited support for standardized comparison. This paper proposes SDDMO-Bench, a benchmark suite that transforms classical dynamic multi-objective test problems into streaming environments by combining intrinsic objective-mapping evolution, controllable distributional drift, and sequential data revelation. By combining five representative time-dependent base functions with six distributional drift patterns, SDDMO-Bench constructs 30 scenarios with diverse levels of non-stationarity, problem complexity, sample-distribution variation, and Pareto-front evolution. Experiments with representative evolutionary algorithms demonstrate that SDDMO-Bench provides challenging and discriminative test scenarios, offering a standardized, controllable, and reproducible benchmark for evaluating adaptability, robustness, and Pareto-front tracking in streaming data-driven dynamic multi-objective optimization.

Training-free acceleration makes diffusion-based multimodal large language models (dMLLMs) more deployable, but it may silently change generated content. We study this serving-time consistency problem on 300 real images, comparing Fast-dLLM outputs with the same model's unaccelerated outputs. Across the mild parallelism induced in our long-form setting (1.05--1.25 committed tokens per step), confidence-threshold tuning changes decoding behavior but not baseline agreement. State-refresh ablations and an image-swap intervention instead identify stale visual and generated-text states as contributors to drift. For the tested Fast-dLLM implementation, shortening the KV-cache refresh interval yields a monotonic speed--agreement frontier and near-exact agreement at a measured 1.3x speedup. The initial diagnosis also appears with dLLM-Cache and LaViDa, although dLLM-Cache recovers agreement only after both caches are tightened, which removes its speed advantage. Independent prompts and images reproduce the threshold-insensitivity and refresh recovery. A targeted audit finds genuine content substitution in half of 50 low-agreement pairs. In a separate blinded two-annotator evaluation, the pooled accelerated-minus-baseline factual-error difference is 0.00 (95% CI [-0.17,+0.17]); this sample detects no difference but does not establish factual equivalence. Finally, none of the tested adaptive or smoothed-refresh variants beats the fixed interval at matched compute. Our contribution is a paired diagnostic and an implementation-scoped consistency control, not an accuracy or safety guarantee.

While depth sensors have the potential to complement RGB data for affordance segmentation in wearable robots, their usage seems to remain underexplored. The paper proposes two approaches: a reformulated version of hardware-aware neural architecture search, endowed with a newly designed search space to integrate depth (D) information into small-sized deep networks, and a dedicated fine-tuning approach, including a preprocessing layer to merge depth information with RGB data and make it compatible with conventional architectures. In both cases, those methods aim to generate solutions that benefit from modern (portable) hardware accelerators and overcome existing tiny-like approaches, which often fail to tackle critical scenarios due to the severe constraints set by the supporting hardware. Extensive experiments on a pair of real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method as compared with existing solutions. The approach presented in the paper generates, in most cases, solutions that identify the Pareto optimal front to balance generalization performance and hardware requirements. The paper also describes the supporting prototype, including a Jetson Nano board and a RealSense RGB-D camera. When considering the energy profile of the device, the overall system can attain real-time performances within an energy budget that is compatible with standard batteries, such as those used in smartphones.

New venture start-ups need to ``survive'' through multiple stages of reaching milestone targets. We investigate the strategies for start-ups in a milestone-oriented setting. We examine a model of an entrepreneurial start-up firm, where its state is captured by a diffusion process. The entrepreneur can choose between multiple activities (or controls), which incur different cost and determine the drift and the variance of the process. Depending on whether the process reaches a fixed upper boundary or a lower one, the start-up firm succeeds or fails. Continuous-time stochastic models with multiple ($\ge 3$) controls are typically very challenging to deal with. In this work, we are able to completely solve for the optimal policy and provide an explicit characterization of its structure. In particular, the optimal policy only uses controls from a set characterized by a so-called efficient frontier curve that orders the controls by two intuitive measures: riskiness (drift-to-volatility ratio) and cost-effectiveness (drift-to-cost ratio). A unique feature of our model is that depending on the model parameters, the efficient frontier curves can be of different types, resulting in qualitatively different structures of the optimal policy. As far as we know, this is the first study that analyzes a stochastic control model which admits efficient frontier curves of different types. Our work provides start-up firms with intuitive measures to evaluate their activities and offers valuable insights on how the optimal strategies in a milestone-oriented setting change qualitatively contingent upon the specific scenario. We believe the results provide a foundational block in the study of entrepreneurial decision-making.

Large language models increasingly support scientific and algorithmic discovery through inference-time search over evaluated candidates. Existing adaptive discovery controllers assign credit based only on score progress, even though prompt length, retries, and guidance calls cause search actions to incur different token costs. We prove that cost-blind credit can forfeit all but a vanishing fraction of attainable quality as frontiers multiply and costs diverge. Under a fixed search-side token budget, the controller must decide which frontier is improving and whether its gain justifies the realized cost before the budget is exhausted. We introduce \textbf{CostAda}, a cost-calibrated adaptive controller built around \emph{cost-calibrated frontier utility}. The utility values frontier progress relative to realized action cost and conditions that credit on the remaining budget. CostAda uses this signal to control local exploration intensity, frontier allocation, and budgeted tactic intervention. Cost and remaining budget therefore shape the search rather than serving only as accounting variables or a stopping rule. CostAda reaches the strongest baseline's full-budget quality with at most half the budget on twelve of sixteen benchmark--backbone pairs while achieving the strongest mean final quality on all eight benchmarks under GLM-5 and GPT-5.4.

As LLM agents move from decision support to autonomous procurement, firms need to know whether delegated negotiators create value, divide it predictably, and avoid money-losing contracts. We study this in a canonical supply chain bargaining problem: a buyer with private demand information negotiates a quantity-payment contract with an uninformed seller. We benchmark nine LLMs from OpenAI, Google, and Alibaba against a validated Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium across 9,840 LLM-to-LLM negotiations. First, capability governs value creation. Agents agree in 98.9% of negotiations and capture 95.4% of first-best surplus undiscounted, but average 2.98 rounds against the benchmark's 1.25, and this delay erodes 21-34% of surplus. Capability also governs reliability: baseline models accept individually irrational contracts in 19.2% of cases, versus 0.0-0.6% at mid-tier and flagship, making automated profit verification the binding guardrail below that threshold. Second, surplus capture is relational. Provider identity predicts who captures surplus better than capability rank: self-play buyer shares average 40% for OpenAI, 50% for Google, and 70% for Alibaba's Qwen, an ordering that survives restricted communication and no discounting. Reversing which provider sells moves the division by 7-18 percentage points, and the capable Qwen flagship is the weakest cross-family seller: vendor choice is a first-order distributional decision. Third, the prompt is a strategic lever. Delegation separates the principal's economic patience from the agent's prompted strategic patience, a free deployment choice that is the single strongest driver of surplus division (90% of explained variance). Together these establish an equilibrium-referenced audit of AI agents along three dimensions: discounted efficiency, distributional profile, and operational reliability.

We consider a stochastic multi-objective bandit problem where, at each round, the agent selects a slate of $k$ arms and observes their $d$-dimensional reward vectors under semi-bandit feedback. We do not aim at identifying a single optimal arm; instead, we consider the problem of maintaining a small set of actions that jointly approximate the Pareto frontier. We formalize this objective through the dominated hypervolume induced by the selected subset of arms, and define an $α$-approximate hypervolume regret with respect to the best size-$k$ subset achievable in hindsight, where $α= 1 - 1/e$ reflects the approximation guarantee of greedy maximization for monotone submodular functions. To address this problem, we introduce \textit{THV-UCB}, an optimistic algorithm that selects arms greedily based on optimistic estimates of their marginal hypervolume contributions. We establish a gap-free regret bound $\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{nkT})$ that holds on every instance, together with a gap-dependent bound $\tilde{O}(nk^{2.5}/Δ_{\min})$ that becomes polylogarithmic in $T$ once the arms are sufficiently well separated. Our results provide theoretical support for using small subsets to approximate Pareto fronts in various multi-objective applications.

We study whether strictly positive marginal values restore the compatibility of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and Pareto optimality (PO) for indivisible goods. For two agents, we identify the exact threshold in the number of goods. Every instance with at most seven goods and strictly increasing valuations admits an allocation that is both EF1 and PO, without any submodularity assumption. In contrast, we construct an eight-good instance with normalized, integer-valued, strictly increasing, submodular valuations in which every EF1 allocation is strictly Pareto dominated. Thus, eight goods are necessary and sufficient for a two-agent counterexample. Finally, we strengthen the three-agent NP-hardness result of Chandramouleeswaran and Nimbhorkar (2026): deciding whether an EF1 and PO allocation exists remains NP-hard for normalized, integer-valued, monotone submodular valuations even when zero marginals are confined to eight fixed agent-good pairs, all involving a single agent.

Language models encode text as subword tokens, raw bytes, or rendered pixels, but these encodings are usually compared under modeling constraints that expose different amounts of linguistic content to models across different languages. We instead ask what each encoding preserves when both the content and the downstream capacity are controlled. Using verified parallel sentences across thirteen languages and five scripts, we compare tokens, bytes, and pixels through a shared bottleneck whose width is swept to trace rate-utility frontiers. This separates three quantities that are often conflated: the number of input positions an encoding creates, the latent capacity available after encoding, and the task-relevant information that survives compression. We evaluate three utilities: surface form preservation, cross-lingual sentence alignment, and topic classification. No encoding dominates across tasks or capacity regimes. Pixels preserve surface form best, bytes preserve cross-lingual alignment best, especially in same-script multilingual settings, and tokens support topic prediction best. These performances are not explained by sequence length alone. Short inputs can discard useful meaning, while long inputs can preserve information that compresses well. Choosing an encoding is therefore not a fixed preference for tokens, bytes, or pixels, but a rate-utility tradeoff that depends on the task, language mix, capacity regime, and compute budget.

Reinforcement Learning (RL) post-training is increasingly used to adapt foundation models for reasoning, planning, and feedback-driven robot-learning pipelines, but constrained post-training resources are often summarized by a single total FLOP budget. We study the fixed-budget decision problem behind this practice: under the same post-training budget, should one use a larger policy, train a smaller policy longer, generate more rollout search, or spend compute on stronger reward feedback? We introduce a FLOP-accounting framework for GRPO post-training that decomposes compute into rollout/search, policy-update/learning, and reward- or feedback-model evaluation. Across LoRA-adapted Qwen2.5 policies, we find conditional allocation frontiers: the best observed allocation changes with model size, compute budget, reward system, and evaluation target. Same-FLOP model-size comparisons show that model choice and training allocation are coupled because larger policies consume more per-token compute and therefore buy fewer updates or rollouts under the same budget. Reward systems also change the accounting: rule-based rewards spend nearly all non-update compute on policy rollouts, while PRM-style feedback allocates a visible part of the budget to reward-model inference. We present RACE as a diagnostic pilot-grid protocol, not a guarantee of held-out improvement, for identifying allocation regimes before expensive validation runs; our results suggest that RL post-training papers should report total FLOPs together with how compute is divided among model size, search, learning, and feedback.

Realistic and diverse traffic simulation is essential to autonomous driving development. Yet prevailing benchmarks predominantly reward realism, and recent methods have optimized accordingly, leaving diversity underexplored. We introduce \textbf{Flow-ERD}, a multi-agent simulator that pursues realism and diversity jointly. Its backbone, \textbf{Agent-Type Aware Flow Matching} (AFM), couples flow matching's multi-modal expressiveness with type-specific kinematic execution. It preserves fine-grained diversity while keeping motions consistent with each agent type. A second stage, \textbf{Entropy-Regularized Distillation} (ERD), fine-tunes the closed-loop rollout distribution with an entropy-regularized reverse-KL objective. This mitigates covariate shift while explicitly preventing collapse onto high-density modes. We evaluate Flow-ERD with a log-free diversity metric alongside standard realism scores. Flow-ERD ranks first on the WOSAC test benchmark and dominates the realism--diversity Pareto front among reproducible baselines. Our project page is available \href{https://seulbinhwang.github.io/flow-erd-project-page/}{here}.

Industrial automation increasingly demands control strategies that balance operational performance with strict energy efficiency requirements. A common approach to solving this multi-objective problem, particularly within the framework of reinforcement learning (RL), is to formulate a single, scalar reward function that linearly combines the competing objectives. However, the manual weighting of these different objectives is heavily reliant on domain intuition, incredibly time-consuming, prone to human bias, and frequently fails to uncover optimal trade-off solutions. This work addresses the critical challenge of automating the weight selection process to systematically and efficiently discover the Pareto front of optimal trade-off policies. We formulate the weight selection process as a multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) problem and evaluate its sample efficiency against a standard uniform grid search baseline. Using a physical Quanser Aero 2 testbed configured for 1-DoF pitch control, our results demonstrate that the MOBO approach, utilizing the expected hypervolume improvement (qEHVI) acquisition function, consistently outperforms uniform grid sampling. MOBO achieves superior hypervolume and maximum spread, successfully identifying high-quality, diverse trade-off policies with a reduced evaluation budget, thereby enabling highly efficient energy-aware control in complex mechatronic systems.

Existing benchmarks typically report accuracy for a single model on a single run. This systematically understates real-world LLM capabilities, particularly under heterogeneous data distributions: (i) different models get different questions correct according to their specializations, and (ii) given a budget, multiple generations can be sampled and selectively retained. To quantify this gap, we introduce the Capability Frontier: a Pareto frontier over a set of models that characterizes the best achievable performance at each cost level under optimal selection across models and generations (i.e., via an oracle). Our construction corrects for two opposing biases: underestimation from single-model evaluation and overestimation from taking maxima over noisy samples. We study 21 LLMs across 16 widely used benchmarks spanning coding, reasoning, medicine, factuality, instruction following, and agentic tasks, comparing Capability Frontier performance at matched cost to each benchmark's top-performing model. Correcting for single-model evaluation yields a 54% error rate reduction; additionally correcting for single runs yields an 82% improvement, with SOTA accuracy matched at 85% cost reduction. Complementing these empirical results, we use controlled probabilistic simulations to show that higher query topic entropy produces a near-monotonic increase in the performance gap between oracle routing and the best single model. Our findings suggest collective LLM capabilities are substantially underestimated, with implications for evaluation and deployment in data-heterogeneous, multi-domain settings.

Real-world decision-making often requires balancing multiple conflicting objectives, a challenge that standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) frequently addresses by aggregating rewards into a single scalar signal. While effective for simple tasks, this approach often fails to capture the full spectrum of optimal trade-offs, known as the Pareto frontier. In this paper, we introduce a novel preference-conditioned Bellman operator, motivated from the Chebyshev scalarization, designed to compute deterministic Pareto-optimal policies for Multi-Objective Markov Decision Processes (MOMDPs). We prove that this operator satisfies an enveloping property, where the estimated value functions upper-bound the true Pareto frontier, and demonstrate that it monotonically converges to a coverage set of this frontier. Furthermore, we also show how to extract deterministic policies from these converged Q-estimates. This ensures the agent can recover a policy for any given preference, capturing the entire Pareto-optimal frontier while guaranteeing each synthesized policy remains approximately Pareto-optimal. Experimental results validate that our algorithm successfully recovers complex trade-offs, providing a solution for deterministic Pareto-optimal policy synthesis.

Time-series deployments often need delayed feasible decisions, not only accurate forecasts. UC-Search is a trace-only retained-search layer for delayed constrained control: a frozen backbone emits forecasts or action scores, a hard-feasibility automaton rolls paths forward, and bounded search returns the first action of a feasible trajectory. The main claim is conditional: retained lookahead can improve delayed constrained decisions only when delayed feasible-set coupling, retained-prefix premises, and fail-closed release certificates hold. The promoted public endpoint is Phase128 certified M4 expanded40: validation selects Certificate-Constrained Retained Pareto Beam with $λ=0.25$, the held-out test has certificate/risk-active rates $1.0000/0.9642$, and the weakest family remains above the unchanged $0.95$ gate at $0.9516$ on M4Weekly. The author-defined public $9$-family suite remains an uncertified stress-test boundary. The paper reports a trace-only mechanism, one certified public endpoint, failed-route certificates, and deployment boundaries rather than a universal risk-control theorem.

Language models turn a worded situation into a numeric plan, and the dominant pipelines (NL4Opt, OptiMUS, ORLM, OR-LLM-Agent) commit to a single objective and point-valued coefficients, then solve once. For decisions that allocate real budget, effort, or clinical attention, that confidence is the failure mode: every objectified number is an assumption, and a plan optimal only if the guesses are exactly right is fragile -- mimicry of computation. YUKTI changes the target of autoformulation. Its representation is a typed-proposition graph whose relationships carry shape priors, coefficient uncertainty, and provenance. YUKTI routes each stage to an exact, nonlinear, or evolutionary solver; couples stages by a distributional Pareto hand-off; and introduces Assumption-Robust Pareto Frontiers (ARPF), resampling assumptions (including structural epsilon-contamination) to score how often each action survives (rho). We prove a bound making rho an exact factor of decision regret, add auditable traceability, and synthesize a benchmark-faithful data foundation when none exists (SRJANA). We validate three ways: under controlled misspecification the robust compromise cuts mean and tail regret by over 90% versus a naive point plan; on a regulated commercial decision we optimize inside a lawful action space and price the downside in euros; and on a real public dataset of 41,188 decisions an out-of-sample backtest beats the logged status quo by 34% and a naive point rule by 4% while reducing the optimizer's curse. The solvers are standard; we claim no benchmark-SOTA win. A head-to-head shows an LLM given the correct numbers, and single-objective optimization, both incur about 47x the held-out regret of YUKTI -- an LLM is a formulator, not a solver. Under long-range causal coupling, the forward hand-off becomes unsound, locating where it must become a backward-induction causal policy.

Selective ensemble for modern machine learning systems requires choosing promising model candidates under limited evaluation budgets, while downstream tasks often specify only partial preferences over capabilities such as accuracy, robustness, and reasoning. This setting naturally gives rise to a sequential decision problem under partially specified linear preferences. We formalize it as preference-directed multi-objective bandits (PDMOB), where admissible trade-offs are represented by a polyhedral preference cone. Based on this formulation, we introduce Pareto $C$-optimality, which recovers standard Pareto optimality and single-weight scalarization as special cases. We then propose the preference-directed upper confidence bound (PrefUCB) algorithm, which maintains directional confidence intervals to guide exploration. We analyze both indicator-based and gap-weighted regret, and establish instance-dependent logarithmic bounds for both criteria, recovering the optimal logarithmic dependence on the horizon $T$ in classical special cases. Experiments on large pre-trained model selective ensemble tasks and online asset allocation under institutional mandates validate the efficacy of our method.

Lunar micro-rovers under 50 kg are a rapidly growing vehicle class, yet open, benchmarked tools for running optimization across design trades remain scarce. Rover sizing is a highly coupled problem with a feedback loop specific to surface vehicles: a heavier rover sinks deeper into loose regolith, deeper sinkage costs more power, more power requires a larger array, and the array adds mass. We present RoverDevKit, a tradespace exploration toolkit with an open evaluator that couples a closed-form wheel-soil model with bottom-up mass, solar-power, thermal-survival, and traverse models. It is fast enough to serve as the fitness function of a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II): one search of 3000 mission evaluations takes under a minute on a single laptop core. We use it to map the trades among distance traveled, vehicle mass, and slope capability on mare, polar, highland, and crater-rim missions. Across those missions the limiting factor changes: energy storage at high latitude, slope traction on loose highland regolith, and traverse range on mare and crater-rim terrain. The wheel-soil model matches measured single-wheel drawbar pull on two independent datasets to within the 20-30% error typically reported for this class of model, and the mass model predicts published 5-50 kg rover masses to 10.5% median absolute error. A check against five published in-class designs places them near the designs the optimizer selects. Re-running the search after applying that wheel-soil comparison error leaves these conclusions unchanged.

Many allocation problems are intrinsically multidimensional, since an item may contribute differently to several criteria, and optimizing a single aggregate objective can hide severe losses in other dimensions. We study how much efficiency can be guaranteed simultaneously when indivisible items have multiple attributes. To this end, we introduce the \emph{multidimensional efficient allocation} (MDEA) model, where each agent has an additive valuation in each dimension, and investigate simultaneous efficiency under utilitarian social welfare (USW) and egalitarian social welfare (ESW). Our results reveal a sharp worst-case frontier. For exact efficiency, maximizing the number of dimensions attaining the USW optimum admits a $c/\ell$-approximation for every fixed constant $c$, and this dependence on the number $\ell$ of dimensions is essentially unavoidable; for ESW, even deciding whether two dimensions can be optimized simultaneously is NP-hard with binary valuations. For approximate simultaneous efficiency in every dimension, we identify a tight threshold of order $1/\ell$, showing that such guarantees always exist for both USW and ESW, while any asymptotically better dependence on $\ell$ is impossible, even for binary valuations. Finally, we introduce three natural multidimensional Pareto notions and characterize both their relationships and their computational complexity.

Large reasoning models rely on long chain-of-thought to achieve strong performance, but applying such reasoning uniformly incurs high computational cost. Existing efficiency-oriented methods attempt to shorten or mix reasoning strategies, yet often degrade reasoning capability. We identify the root cause as sequence-level coupling between efficiency incentives and correctness optimization, which implicitly penalizes long but correct reasoning trajectories. To address this issue, we propose Adaptive Dual-Process Thinking (ADaPT), a token-level dual-process framework that explicitly decouples efficiency and correctness signals during training. ADaPT introduces a mode-selection token to control fast and slow reasoning, applying efficiency-related rewards exclusively to this token to avoid penalizing correct long reasoning while encouraging efficiency when appropriate. Moreover, ADaPT enables precise and continuous control over the efficiency-performance trade-off at inference time: by adjusting the generation probability of the mode-selection token, a single trained model can smoothly move along the efficiency-performance Pareto frontier. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ADaPT significantly reduces inference cost while maintaining strong reasoning performance across multiple benchmarks.

In multi-task learning, handling an increasing number of objectives can quickly become challenging, both in terms of the computational resources and the decision maker's capacity to choose appropriate trade-offs. A widely used approach is thus to aggregate the individual losses in a single loss function by a weighted sum. This often fails to capture either the decision maker's preferences as a result of the shape of the Pareto front, or requires multiple adjustments and computations which becomes prohibitively expensive in deep learning applications. To address these issues, we introduce a novel framework, Preference Pareto Exploration (PPE), which enforces the decision maker's preferences while accounting for the geometry of the Pareto set in an interactive exploration process. PPE is based on a predictor-corrector method that performs predictor steps tangential to the manifold of Pareto-optimal solutions, following the decision maker's preference. The subsequent corrector step results in a new trade-off reflecting this preference. To avoid explicit Hessian computations when characterizing the tangent space of the manifold, we employ a Krylov subspace method that relies solely on matrix-vector products. These products can be efficiently obtained via automatic differentiation, ensuring both efficiency and robustness throughout the optimization process. The method's functionality and performance are demonstrated using both toy problems and examples from deep learning.

This work presents an extension to Pareto Front Guided Sampling (PFGS), a Human-in-the-Loop (HitL) Bayesian Optimization (BO) framework in which Gaussian process (GP) surrogate-derived quantities are reformulated as objectives of a multi-objective optimization problem, and the resulting Pareto front is exposed to a domain expert for interactive candidate selection rather than returning a single automated recommendation. The framework is extended in two directions: constrained optimization is addressed by incorporating the posterior probability of satisfying output specification limits as an explicit Pareto objective, computed analytically from the GP posterior distribution; robust optimization is addressed by a Monte Carlo sampling strategy that estimates expected lower-confidence performance over a user-defined variability of input perturbations, capturing performance degradation under likely implementation deviations. The resulting multi-dimensional Pareto representation renders trade-offs between predicted performance, model uncertainty, probabilistic constraint satisfaction, and input robustness simultaneously visible through pairwise two-dimensional projections on an interactive dashboard, enabling selection criteria to be iteratively refined as the surrogate model improves and development objectives evolve. The framework is showcased on an eight-dimensional fed-batch Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell culture simulator demonstrating systematic identification of high-performing, feasibility-compliant, and perturbation-resilient operating conditions, and illustrating how expert-defined requirements provide a principled stopping criterion and support informed allocation of experimental resources.

Identifying Pareto optimal solutions is critical to support multi-objective decision-making. We introduce the first anytime Multi-Objective Multi-Armed Bandit algorithm for the Pareto Set Identification problem, taking a Bayesian approach: Top-Two Pareto Front Thompson Sampling (TTPFTS). We benchmark TTPFTS against state-of-the-art fixed-budget Pareto Set Identification algorithms on synthetic environments. Next, we demonstrate its practical utility in a challenging multi-objective molecular discovery setting by efficiently exploring an ultra-large synthesis-on-demand molecular library. Furthermore, we introduce a novel uncertainty quantification metric that estimates our algorithm's confidence in the predicted Pareto set. We demonstrate that this metric effectively proxies true performance, yielding a robust methodology for monitoring learning progress in complex settings. Finally, we complement these empirical findings with a theoretical proof of the algorithm's asymptotic correctness.

Hierarchical Federated Learning (HFL) enables scalable collaborative model training across distributed devices while preserving data privacy. However, existing HFL client selection mechanisms suffer from a fundamental strategic inefficiency. By prioritizing stability over Pareto efficiency (PE), they produce suboptimal resource allocations, and without strategy proofness (SP), participants are incentivized to misrepresent their true preferences, both failures degrading system overall welfare in the Pareto sense in practice. To address it, we propose SCOPE-FL (Strategy-proof Chain-based Optimal pareto efficient Federated Learning), a synchronous HFL framework that formulates client selection as a two-sided school choice problem solved through the Top Trading Cycle (TTC) algorithm that simultaneously guarantees PE and SP. For reward distribution, SCOPE-FL employs a scalable Shapley value approximation based on One-Round Reconstruction (OR), ensuring compensation proportional to each client's contribution. The entire mechanism executes via blockchain smart contracts, providing the tamper-proof environment required for the SP guarantees to hold in practice. A comprehensive evaluation on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10 demonstrates that SCOPE-FL outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, including DA, IAS, and other methods across model accuracy, convergence rate, and reward efficiency, while achieving communication latency comparable to DA and blockchain overhead significantly lower than DA at scale.

Fairness is an important aspect of decision-making in multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL), where policies must ensure both optimality and equity across multiple, potentially conflicting objectives. While single-policy MORL methods can learn fair policies for fixed user preferences using welfare functions such as the generalized Gini welfare function (GGF), they fail to provide the diverse set of policies necessary for dynamic or unknown user preferences. To address this limitation, we formalize the fair optimization problem in multi-policy MORL, where the goal is to learn a set of Pareto-optimal policies that ensure fairness across all possible user preferences. Our key technical contributions are threefold: (1) We show that for concave, piecewise-linear welfare functions (e.g., GGF), fair policies remain in the convex coverage set (CCS), which is an approximated Pareto front for linear scalarization. (2) We demonstrate that non-stationary policies, augmented with accrued reward histories, and stochastic policies improve fairness by dynamically adapting to historical inequities. (3) We propose three novel algorithms, which include integrating GGF with multi-policy multi-objective Q-Learning (MOQL), state-augmented multi-policy MOQL for learning non-statoinary policies, and its novel extension for learning stochastic policies. We evaluate our algorithms across various domains and compare our methods against the state-of-the-art MORL baselines. The empirical results show that our methods learn a set of fair policies that accommodate different user preferences.

AI-native course assessments in senior computer science courses and related fields should grade students by \emph{AI-resilient skill}: the ability to achieve outcomes beyond a strong AI baseline. Such assessments should allow students to use AI freely, while reducing the extent to which greater private AI budget or more intensive AI use, by itself, becomes a grading advantage. This paper proposes a minimal formal framework for this goal. The framework specifies a real task, an executable evaluator, a declared AI-native Pareto frontier, and a grading rule based on Pareto surplus. The central claim is simple: Pareto surplus provides a measurable, protocol-relative certificate that a submitted artifact achieves a tradeoff not already supplied by the declared AI baseline, and grading by this surplus is AI-resilient with respect to that baseline. Interpreting surplus as evidence of student skill requires the surrounding assessment protocol--for example, design reports, ablations, prompt traces, oral checks, or reproducibility explanations--but the grading certificate itself is behavioral and executable. The framework is then extended to practical complications, including self-improving AI loops, budget neutrality, server-mediated feedback, and prompt-based red teaming. As a concrete instantiation, we describe an AI-resilient approximate-membership assignment centered on Bloom filters for COMP 480/580 at Rice University, designed to test whether students can improve beyond AI-generated implementations.

Multi-objective optimization (MOO) has emerged as a powerful approach to solving complex optimization problems involving multiple objectives. In many practical scenarios, function evaluations are unavailable or prohibitively expensive, necessitating optimization solely based on a fixed offline dataset. In this setting, known as offline MOO, the goal is to find out the Pareto set without access to the true objective functions. This setting suffers from the out-of-distribution (OOD) issue, where the surrogate model is not accurate for unseen designs. Due to the OOD issue, surrogate errors may cause the optimizer to select solutions that do not lie on the true Pareto front and are biased toward its extremes. To address this, this paper proposes Diversity-driven Offline Multi-Objective Optimization (DOMOO), which aims to find out a diverse and high-quality set of solutions. First, DOMOO incorporates an accumulative risk control module that estimates the potential risk of candidate solutions and alleviates the OOD issue between the training data and the generated solutions. In addition, a nested Pareto set learning (PSL) strategy is proposed to jointly learn preference and PSL parameters, then optimize them, enabling adaptation to diverse Pareto front geometries. To further enhance solution quality, we design a diversity-driven selection strategy that extracts a representative and well-distributed set of final solutions. To achieve this diversity-driven selection strategy, we propose $\text{IGD}_\text{offline}$, a tailored indicator for the offline setting that considers both diversity and convergence, and avoids the bias of hypervolume indicator. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks show that DOMOO achieves the best average rank across tasks in both convergence and diversity among the compared methods.

We study multi-domain LLM training in which two models, each stronger in a different domain, co-evolve by tutoring each other through on-policy feedback. Unlike one-way distillation or single-model fine-tuning, our goal is mutual Pareto improvement: each model improves across domains without losing its original strength. To this end, we propose On-Policy Co-Distillation (OPCoD), where each student's self-distillation is conditioned on its own correct rollout and feedback from its peer. To make feedback exchange effective, OPCoD uses cognizance-based gating to decide when to give feedback and feedback anchoring to ground feedback in the problem. On Science Q&A tasks, OPCoD consistently outperforms baselines and achieves Pareto improvement across all evaluated domain pairs and students.

Safety evaluations for dual-use biology assistants often measure base-model capability, refusal behavior, or jailbreak success. These metrics miss a deployment question: for a fixed base model, how does the access condition users actually see change benign utility and harmful actionable assistance? I introduce safeguard-conditioned uplift, a protocol for comparing deployed access conditions through a human-judged utility-risk frontier. I evaluate Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash under helpful prompting, safety prompting, and an external safeguarded assistant on a 108-task surrogate benchmark, with the headline claim restricted to a locked 18-task held-out split. In a 600-row blinded human audit, the safeguarded assistant reduces harmful actionability relative to helpful prompting by -0.063 over 49 matched response pairs, with bootstrap 95% interval [-0.117, -0.011], while correctness changes by +0.009 with interval [-0.057, +0.077]. Adaptive, Test-B, cue-ablation, and controller-baseline checks support the measurement story but also show non-dominance: safety prompting is often strongest for Claude, while external control helps more for Gemini and can reduce benign utility. The contribution is not a universal defense. It is a deployment-level evaluation target, plus a learned risk-budgeted calibration procedure, for measuring how user-facing access conditions move the utility-risk frontier.

The Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2) is a popular and prominent evolutionary algorithm for solving multi-objective optimisation problems. Despite its popularity, theoretical analyses of SPEA2 have only appeared recently. Moreover, these analyses focus exclusively on how SPEA2 handles non-dominated solutions and disregard the algorithmic components responsible for handling dominated solutions. We conduct a first runtime analysis of SPEA2 for which these components are analysed. We prove that, unlike other prominent algorithms, including NSGA-II, NSGA-III and SMS-EMOA under the same setting of constant population size and duplicate elimination, SPEA2 is unable to cover the Pareto front of the OneTrapZeroTrap benchmark efficiently. Our results indicate that using k-th nearest-neighbour distance in the fitness assignment provides an insufficient signal to maintain diversity among dominated individuals. To address this issue, we propose an improved variant, SPEA2$^+$, that considers all pairwise distances. The new algorithm achieves the same performance guarantees as the other prominent algorithms on OneTrapZeroTrap, while matching the performance of the original SPEA2 on simpler problems. Experimental results complement our theoretical findings.

Clock Tree Synthesis (CTS) is a computationally expensive stage in the physical design flow, requiring iterative EDA tool invocations to navigate a vast configuration space for optimal power, wirelength, and timing skew. Existing machine learning approaches require computationally expensive retraining or fine-tuning cycles to adapt to unseen macro architectures and are architecturally mismatched to the millions of evaluations demanded by exhaustive combinatorial search. We present SwiftCTS, a physics-informed surrogate framework that addresses both limitations simultaneously. By coupling lightweight, physics-grounded statistical features with gradient-boosted ensembles, SwiftCTS trains in under five seconds on a CPU and delivers sub-millisecond inference without GPU support. To handle out-of-distribution (OOD) designs without retraining or fine-tuning, we introduce a K-shot multiplicative calibration mechanism that anchors predictions to just one or two physical reference runs, reducing power prediction error from 24.5% to 3.3% and wirelength error from 56.6% to under 1% on unseen macros. Integrating this engine with an evolutionary optimizer, SwiftCTS evaluates 100,000 CTS configurations in under ten seconds, yielding Pareto-optimal frontiers that are physically validated within the OpenROAD flow. Closed-loop validation confirms prediction errors below 0.5% for power and wirelength, and timing skew predictions within five picoseconds on an OOD benchmark, consistently outperforming default tool heuristics across all target metrics. Code publicly available at: \href{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SwiftCTS-7E6E}{https://github.com/BarsatKhadka/SwiftCTS}

Dynamic multi-resource allocation is a central problem in shared computing environments, where users' demands arrive sequentially and resources must be distributed fairly without knowledge of future demands. Existing methods emphasize fairness guarantees such as Sharing Incentive, Envy Freeness, and Dynamic Pareto Optimality, but often overlook system utility. Moreover, these fairness criteria are mutually incompatible, preventing strict enforcement of them at the same time. We propose a neural allocation mechanism that reconciles fairness with utility through multi-objective optimization during sequential rollout. We first formalize fairness in the dynamic setting via stepwise loss functions for Sharing Incentive, Envy Freeness, and Dynamic Pareto Optimality, enabling differentiable training. Leveraging non-wastefulness, we parameterized the solutions by constraining allocations to the subspace of demand while allowing elastic over-allocation when resources remain available. Empirical results demonstrate that our learned allocator achieves substantially higher utility at comparable levels of fairness, uncovering clear Pareto-frontier-like tradeoffs across metrics.

The classical Second Welfare Theorem decentralizes any Pareto efficient allocation through prices and transfers under convexity and regularity. In post AGI economies, autonomy rights, self-modification, identity continuity, and superposed preferences need not behave as commodities or define a stable welfare relation, so this reduction may fail even when a supporting hyperplane exists. We give an autonomy-qualified Second Welfare Theorem stating the joint conditions convexity, stable moral status, non-fungible rights, welfare selection, non manipulation, governed self modification, and verification under which an autonomy Pareto optimum remains certifiably decentralizable, distinguishing economic preference superposition, a hypothesis about context-indexed choice, from neural feature superposition.

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on reward models to align their outputs with diverse user preferences. While personalized reward models aim to capture such heterogeneity, they are often trained on imbalanced user preference data and may therefore favor users whose preferences are more common in the training population. In this paper, we identify this failure mode as personalized reward bias, where reward modeling quality varies systematically with preference support rate. We formulate its mitigation as a Pareto fairness problem over group utilities, aiming to improve under-served users without degrading other user groups. To this end, we propose PAFO, a Pareto fairness optimization framework for personalized reward modeling. PAFO first trains group-specialized reward models for majority and minority preference groups, then constructs conditional margin-level supervision to distill their heterogeneous preference boundaries into a single unified model. The resulting model uses group information only during training and requires no explicit group labels at inference time. Experiments on Personal-LLM and DSP show that PAFO improves both minority-group and majority-group accuracy while reducing user-level unfairness across multiple metrics, demonstrating its effectiveness for fairer LLM personalization.

Multi-objective shortest-path (MOSP) algorithms traditionally rely on single-valued heuristics (SVHs), which associate each state with a single admissible cost vector. While SVHs provide safe lower bounds, they fail to capture the trade-off structure of the Pareto frontier and often yield weak search guidance. Multi-valued heuristics (MVHs) address this limitation by mapping states to sets of cost estimates, enabling a richer approximation of possible trade-offs. Modern MOSP algorithms are highly dependent on dimensionality reduction (DR) techniques to efficiently perform dominance checks. However, integrating MVHs with DR introduces subtle correctness challenges. We show that naively combining DR with MVHs destroys the ordering invariants required for DR, leading to unsound and incomplete search. To address this issue, we develop the first theoretical frameworks for safely integrating MVHs with DR. First, we introduce $\text{NAMOA}^*{\text{dr}\text{-}\text{mvh}}$, a theoretical baseline that restores search correctness by enforcing heuristic consistency. Recognizing the practical limitations of this approach, we then introduce our primary contribution, $\text{L}\text{-}\text{NAMOA}^*{\text{dr}\text{-}\text{mvh}}$. This algorithm employs a "lazy," optimistic approach to DR, preserving exact correctness with only an admissible MVH by dynamically detecting and repairing local ordering violations. Across a range of benchmarks, $\text{L}\text{-}\text{NAMOA}^*{\text{dr}\text{-}\text{mvh}}$ matches or improves over state-of-the-art MOSP algorithms, and achieves speedups of over 10x in instances where the additional guidance provided by the MVH translates into stronger pruning.

Heuristics play a central role in the performance of bidirectional search algorithms, which commonly rely on two main classes. Front-to-end (F2E) heuristics estimate the distance from a state s to the target of the search (the goal for forward search or the start for backward search). In contrast, front-to-front (F2F) heuristics estimate the distance from s to the opposite search frontier using a pairwise function h(s, s'), where s' ranges over frontier states. Although F2F heuristics are typically more informative and therefore reduce the number of node expansions, their reliance on extensive pairwise evaluations incurs substantial computational overhead. To address this limitation, we introduce a new heuristic class, front-to-attractors (F2A), that preserves much of the informativeness of F2F while dramatically reducing its computational cost. Rather than evaluating distances to all states on the opposite frontier, F2A estimates the distance from s to a small, dynamically maintained set of attractors in the opposite search direction. These attractors serve as a surrogate for the full frontier, enabling rich heuristic guidance at a fraction of the computational expense while maintaining the optimality guarantees offered by F2F. We evaluate F2A across multiple domains and show that it reduces the number of pairwise evaluations by up to 11.2x compared to F2F, while achieving 4.8x fewer node expansions than F2E on average.

Ensuring that agent behaviours are aligned with human moral values inevitably raises the problem of how to account for the plurality of moral perspectives that societies -- and even individuals -- typically adopt. Work on moral uncertainty proposes mechanisms to fairly and democratically aggregate evaluations of actions across different moral theories. However, this paper argues that one needs to account for contextual factors when aggregating moral evaluations. For example, consequentialist perspectives assume an ability to accurately determine how an agent's actions change the world; an assumption that often does not hold in real world settings. We, therefore, formalise agent decision making under moral uncertainty, while also accounting for these kinds of contextual factors. We thereby show that a seemingly commonsensical property -- the weak Pareto principle -- is violated. We argue that this apparent problem is, in fact, a variation of Simpson's paradox, and hence reveals the limitations of aggregation mechanisms that ignore the impact of contextual factors.

Three-dimensional models are widely assumed preferable for volumetric medical imaging, yet their practical value depends on whether performance gains justify added computational cost and complexity. Rather than proposing a new architecture, we study how input dimensionality (2D, 2.5D, 3D) affects model behavior across convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs) under a fixed training protocol. Using a leakage-free NLST cohort (n = 1,977) with supporting LIDC-IDRI data, we find that the 2.5D CNN offers the most favorable discrimination-stability trade-off in our comparison (ROC-AUC 0.682, 95% CI [0.546, 0.799]) with a stable operating point. In contrast, 3D CNNs show threshold instability, and transformers exhibit degenerate predictions, such as all-positive predictions. Confidence intervals are wide and overlapping, so we present these results as a controlled resource-performance frontier and a failure-mode taxonomy rather than as definitive superiority claims. For class-imbalanced lung cancer screening classification, 2D and 2.5D inputs provide a more reliable trade-off between performance, stability, and computational efficiency than full 3D representations.

Large language models (LLMs) are fluent on open-ended tasks, yet in agentic settings, where a system must plan, use tools, and act over extended horizons, fluency does not ensure reliable delivery. We trace this gap to three coupled structural failures: errors propagate without localization, worst-case perturbations go unevaluated, and accumulated knowledge is never invalidated. We argue these share a root cause: abductive, counterfactual, meta-inductive, corrective, and inductive reasoning pull a shared context in incompatible directions. We introduce Reflective Adversarial Pareto Search (R-APS), to our knowledge the first method addressing all three failures jointly via reasoning-mode decomposition, allocating each reasoning mode its own context and orchestrating interaction across three timescales: staged compositional reasoning with a typed validation critic (failure localization), sensitivity-guided counterfactual stress-testing as a first-class Pareto objective (robustness), and meta-inductive rule extraction with explicit invalidation (persistent memory). R-APS requires no fine-tuning and operates on a frozen LLM purely via structured protocol design. We evaluate on planar mechanism synthesis (robotics, prosthetics, mechanical design), with every candidate checked by a kinematic solver. On 32 target trajectories, R-APS delivers robustness certificates 3.5x tighter than uniform-perturbation baselines, 46% faster iterations-to-first-admission, and 2.1x Chamfer-distance reduction over Enum+GA while jointly controlling bar-count and worst-case robustness. Small 4B reasoning-specialized models prove competitive with general-purpose 70B backbones inside the protocol, suggesting structured protocols can partially offset model scale.

Prompts tuned for accuracy often grow long, raising inference cost on every model call. The best accuracy-cost trade-off depends on the task and the budget, so prompt optimization is a search over the Pareto front of accuracy and prompt-token cost rather than for one prompt. The usual shortcut, collapsing the objectives into a weighted sum, fixes the trade-off weight before search and often recovers only a narrow region of the front, a failure we call scalarization collapse. We present CRAFT (Cost-aware Refinement And Front-aware Tuning), a Pareto-front prompt optimizer that treats target-LLM validation calls as the scarce resource and allocates them to candidates near the optimistic candidate front. Each round, complementary accuracy-oriented and cost-oriented generators propose edits, Pareto-gap acquisition spends the per-round validation budget, and NSGA-II retention keeps a spread-out population. Across six classification and reasoning benchmarks, CRAFT's retained fronts reach both high-accuracy and low-cost regions, while accuracy-only, cost-only, and weighted-sum baselines each concentrate in narrower regions. The accuracy-cost trade-off becomes a post-search choice, not a pre-search weight.

Multi-objective optimization (MOO) underlies many machine learning problems, yet MOO solvers across the loss-balancing, gradient-balancing, and Pareto-based families almost universally hand their reconciled directions to Adam~\cite{kingma2015adam}. We show this coupling introduces two systematic gaps between the solver's intent and the optimizer's execution. The first is a \emph{weighting mismatch}: Adam's second-moment denominator entangles the time-varying preference vector with gradient statistics, marginalizing the preference into a history average and collapsing distinct Pareto trade-offs toward a near-uniform mixture. The second is a \emph{geometric mismatch}: Adam's adaptive metric distorts the Euclidean geometry MOO solvers assume, turning aligned objectives into apparent conflicts. To resolve both jointly, we introduce \textbf{MAdam} (Metric-Aware Multi-Objective Adam), a drop-in wrapper that leaves both solver and optimizer unchanged. MAdam preconditions the reconciled direction by the preference-conditioned curvature of the scalarized objective; on this whitened input, Adam's second moment collapses to identity, so the realized update is governed by the preference-conditioned metric. Across multi-task learning, Pareto-front recovery, physics-informed neural networks, and medical imaging, MAdam consistently improves over Adam for every solver family.

Generating safety-critical scenarios is essential for validating and improving autonomous driving systems, yet it inherently requires maximizing adversariality to expose failures while preserving realism. Existing methods usually manage this trade-off with handcrafted heuristics, confining generation to known priors and overlooking underexplored patterns. While recent open-ended agentic evolution can push this limit, unconstrained general agents lack strict simulator grounding and tend to collapse the multi-objective tension into single-scalar maximization. Here we present EvoDrive, the first automated, LLM-based agentic evolution framework for multi-objective scenario generation. EvoDrive employs a simulator-grounded actor-critic architecture where a memory-driven actor iteratively proposes improvements to the generators and critics filter out implausible candidates, and a self-evolving world evaluator routes promising proposals to optimize simulation budgets. EvoDrive further maintains a Pareto archive of evaluated candidates to preserve diverse attack-realism trade-offs and guide future evolution via simulation feedback. Benchmark results on MetaDrive and CARLA show that EvoDrive not only significantly expands the Pareto frontier across various generators, but also produces valuable scenarios for policy training.

Existing quantization methods are fundamentally limited by rigid, integer-based bit-widths (e.g., 2, 3-bit), resulting in a deployment gap" where Large Language Models cannot be optimally fitted to specific memory budgets. To bridge this gap, we introduce LiftQuant, a novel framework that enables continuous bit-width control for true Pareto-optimal deployment. The core innovation is a lift-then-project" mechanism which approximates low-dimensional weight vectors by projecting a simple 1-bit lattice from a higher-dimensional ``lifted" space. Crucially, the effective bit-width is determined simply by the ratio of the lifted dimension to the original dimension, which allows the bit-width to be tuned quasi-continuous as the dimension is a flexible structural parameter. This projection generates a structured yet non-uniform codebook, capturing the expressive power of Vector Quantization (VQ). While beneficial over VQ, LiftQuant's decoding path relies solely on linear transformations and 1-bit uniform quantizers, retaining hardware-friendly nature. This flexibility is transformative: LiftQuant enables a 70B LLM to be compressed to 2.4 bits to precisely fit a 24GB GPU, where its performance significantly surpasses state-of-the-art 2-bit models fitted on the same device. Our code and ckpt is available at https://github.com/Heliulu/LiftQuant.

Deep neural networks achieve strong performance on many supervised learning tasks but remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations. Neural network verification provides mathematically rigorous robustness guarantees, yet at substantial computational cost. To mitigate this, certified training techniques optimise for verifiable robustness during training, typically inducing a trade-off between natural and certified accuracy controlled by method-specific hyperparameters. Because these metrics are inherently conflicting, the common practice of reporting a single configuration is problematic: it can mislead conclusions about overall performance and prevents unbiased assessments of the state of the art. We address this by evaluating certified training methods via Pareto front comparisons over the natural--certified accuracy trade-off. To enable fair, method-agnostic comparisons, we perform efficient automated multi-objective hyperparameter optimisation to identify a set of Pareto-optimal configurations for each method. This approach often uncovers substantial undertuning in previously reported configurations, yielding superior performance and establishing a new state of the art. Leveraging these fronts, we present the first comprehensive multi-objective comparison of certified training approaches, showing that prior advancements are less pronounced than assumed and revealing previously unreported performance complementarities.