Class Imbalance

Deep Imbalanced Regression (DIR) addresses a common failure mode of regression models: target distributions are highly non-uniform, causing models to perform best in densely populated target regions even when reliable performance is required across the full target range. Despite rapid methodological progress, DIR evaluation remains constrained by three blind spots: it is dominated by image-based benchmarks, its standard many-/medium-/few-shot protocol is diagnostic but not decision-complete, and tail-region stability across random seeds has not been systematically evaluated. We revisit DIR evaluation along these three axes. First, we broaden the data domain by evaluating DIR on a multimodal virtual sensing benchmark (\textsc{MuViS}) with nine time-series extrinsic regression tasks across six physical domains, where rare target values often correspond to operationally meaningful regimes. Second, we adopt balanced MAE (\emph{bMAE}) and introduce balanced Mean Absolute Scaled Error (\emph{bMASE}), a scale-normalized metric for decision-complete comparison across methods and datasets. Third, through a repeated reevaluation of six representative DIR methods across multiple random seeds, we show that the tail regions targeted by DIR exhibit particularly high sensitivity to seed-level variability. Our results show that standard virtual-sensing models exhibit substantial tail degradation hidden by global MAE, that existing DIR methods can improve balanced performance but transfer unevenly to multimodal time-series data, and that tail-region instability remains a largely hidden failure mode under current DIR evaluation practice. Together, these findings and our publicly available code provide a reproducible basis for future DIR research toward regression systems that capture rare target regimes as reliably as common ones.

Density-Ratio Rescoring (DRR) augments a classifier trained at the original class prior with a survey-raking dual score. Raking reweights the majority sample to match minority feature moments within a tolerance. DRR marginally standardizes the dual and base scores and combines them with a fixed weight of one half, using the fitted dual directly for prediction without resampling or refitting the base classifier. Under exact population matching and a correctly specified log-linear tilt model, the dual equals the log density ratio up to an additive constant. A class-separation analysis characterizes the signal strength and correlation conditions under which fusion improves separation under common within-class covariance. On 24 tabular benchmarks, evaluated over 30 trials and five base learners, DRR at the D=128 random-feature setting improves average precision over the standardized base on every dataset, with a mean gain of 0.034. It exceeds the shared-dual raking-and-relabeling resampler on 22 of 24 datasets, with a mean gain of $0.092$, and on all eight one-versus-rest tasks of a shared gene-expression cohort. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of using raking duals as reusable scores for improving rare-class ranking while retaining classifiers trained at the original prior.

Class-balanced learning and label noise create a coupled failure mode: frequency correction prevents majority classes from dominating the decision rule, but can amplify incorrectly labeled minority examples. We introduce BARGE (Bounded Adjustment with Reliability-Guided Embeddings), a single-stage objective combining a bounded, prior-adjusted density-power score with reliability-guided angular geometry. Its classification score is strictly proper in the adjusted probability space and recovers balanced Bayes ordering under clean supervision and the true class prior. Under label contamination, its finite range bounds classification-risk perturbation at a fixed predictor, while its logit gradient redescends when the model confidently contradicts the supplied label. The adjusted target probability also weights class-equal feature compactness, and a one-sided separation term discourages aligned class directions. BARGE requires neither a noise rate nor a transition matrix, uses one network, and leaves inference unchanged. We evaluate it on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet under long-tail and step imbalance, clean labels, and 20% and 40% random incorrect-label replacement. Across 12 clean settings, BARGE ranks second overall and attains the lowest error in four. Under corruption, it achieves the lowest mean balanced error in all six dataset-corruption settings, reducing the six-setting average from 72.32% for the strongest competitor to 70.00%. It also obtains the highest macro-F1 and macro-AUPRC in every corrupted-label setting. Ablations show that class-equal angular compactness improves on the bounded score alone. These results support bounded predictive influence and reliability-guided geometry as complementary mechanisms for imbalanced learning with uncertain labels.

Real-world datasets often exhibit long-tailed class distributions, where a few head classes contain a large number of training samples while a large number of tail classes have only a few. The composition of each mini-batch, determined by the sampling strategy, governs which classes contribute to the stochastic gradient estimate, and therefore affects convergence behaviour and generalisation across the whole class spectrum. We provide a systematic theoretical and empirical comparison of four mini-batch sampling strategies for long-tailed image classification: uniform instance sampling, class-balanced sampling, square-root sampling, and progressively balanced sampling. We place all four in a unified bias-variance framework describing their effect on gradient estimation, which exposes the tension between unbiased optimisation of the empirical loss and fair representation of rare classes. We then evaluate them under controlled conditions using ResNet-32 on CIFAR-100-LT at three imbalance ratios (rho = 10, 50, 100), with every strategy sharing the same long-tailed subsets and initialisation within a seed. Progressive sampling improves tail-class accuracy by 25% relative to the uniform baseline at rho = 100 (13.5% versus 10.8%), consistently across all three seeds, while its overall accuracy is not distinguishable from that of uniform sampling given the seed-to-seed variation (40.0% versus 39.7%); the tail-class gain, not the overall gain, is the robust effect. At rho = 100, class-balanced sampling degrades accuracy on every class group, including the tail classes it is designed to help, which we attribute to overfitting caused by extreme oversampling of scarce data; at rho = 50 this failure is confined to head and medium classes. These results indicate that when rebalancing is applied during training matters as much as how much rebalancing is applied.

As deep learning models become fundamental to modern healthcare, the "Right to be Forgotten" mandated by privacy regulations like GDPR and HIPAA necessitates effective machine unlearning (MU) to remove sensitive patient data from trained models. However, existing MU techniques often struggle with a fundamental "privacy-efficiency-utility" (PEU) trilemma, particularly in medical scenarios where data is frequently characterized by severe class imbalance and long-tailed distributions. In such cases, standard unlearning methods can fail to protect key clinical knowledge or mistakenly delete features essential for diagnosing rare conditions due to the gradient dominance of majority classes. To address these challenges, we propose GRIN+, a novel machine unlearning framework designed for fast and precise data erasure in imbalanced medical scenarios. GRIN+ decouples unlearning-specific knowledge from generalized representations at the parameter level by analyzing the gradient contributions of both "forget" and "retain" sets. It introduces a class-adaptive influence scoring mechanism to rectify gradient dominance and employs a direction-constrained update strategy to prevent the unintended erosion of vital clinical knowledge. Comprehensive benchmarking across multiple medical datasets, including skin cancer (ISIC), brain tumor (MRI), and breast ultrasound (BUSI), demonstrates that GRIN+ achieves an optimal balance of the PEU trilemma. Experimental results show that GRIN+ maintains high diagnostic accuracy and robust privacy while significantly enhancing runtime efficiency compared to existing baselines. We open-source the GRIN+ code and benchmarks to support further research.

Efficient microservice scheduling is crucial for maintaining load balance across nodes in data centers and ensuring high quality of service. However, achieving this in practice remains challenging due to dynamic resource imbalance under fluctuating workloads, nonlinear coupling across multiple resource dimensions, and the heterogeneity of microservice resource demands. While reinforcement learning-based approaches have shown promise, they struggle to capture the complex interdependencies among heterogeneous resources and neglect the importance of learning informative system representations. To address these limitations, we propose MCRL2, a novel reinforcement learning approach augmented with multi-resource cross-attention-based representation learning for microservice scheduling. Specifically, we first propose MCRL, a novel representation learning approach that captures structured and informative interactions among nodes, resources, and microservices via a multi-resource cross-attention mechanism. Then, MCRL2 augments reinforcement learning through MCRL-enhanced actor-critic architecture combined with a maximum entropy objective, improving system state expressiveness and leading to more stable and effective scheduling decisions. Extensive experiments on real production cluster traces demonstrate that MCRL2 significantly outperforms existing baselines in load balancing, scheduling success rate and average completion time across diverse workload patterns.

Shortcut learning denotes the widespread situation in which a classifier exploits spurious correlations rather than diagnostic features. Existing mitigation strategies mostly aim to learn shortcut-invariant representations; their empirical success is limited and they cannot be applied to classifiers using frozen foundation model encoders. We propose to reframe shortcut learning as fundamentally a calibration problem: unconstrained learning implicitly calibrates each shortcut group to its training set disease prevalence, rendering the resulting classifier necessarily over-confident in one group and under-confident in the other. Building on this insight, we prevalence-equalize calibration between shortcut groups through two encoder-agnostic methods, an in-processing regularizer and a post-hoc prevalence-equalized recalibration step. Across chest-drain-pneumothorax benchmarks on CheXpert and SIIM-ACR, spanning fine-tuned CNNs and frozen foundation-model backbones, both methods substantially outperform all baselines. Post-hoc recalibration of a standard ERM-trained DenseNet raises misaligned-group AUROC from 0.23 to 0.73, indicating that shortcut reliance degrades the classification head rather than the underlying representation. Besides two new state-of-the-art shortcut mitigation approaches, our findings more fundamentally connect shortcut learning to calibration theory and algorithmic fairness.

Ensuring the security of the power system is essential for stability and reliability, especially in the event of disruption. Effective classification of contingency in power systems enables proactive decision-making and mitigates large-scale breakdowns and failures. This study explores the use of machine learning algorithms to classify security levels of contingencies in power systems into safe, moderate or severe classes. For this approach, Newton-Raphson load flow method extracts system data from contingency scenarios, using Overall Performance Index (OPI) as safety measure. For data pre-processing, Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used to address class imbalance and reduce dimensionality, respectively. K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) is trained and evaluated on datasets generated through N-k contingency scenarios for k equal 1, 2, and 3 on IEEE-14 and IEEE-30 bus systems using four hybrid pre-processing configurations: normalized, SMOTE-balanced, PCA-transformed, and a combined SMOTE PCA-transformed. Performance is assessed by precision, recall and F1 score, with priority given to the severe contingency classes. The RF achieved the highest F1 scores of 0.97 in IEEE-30 and 0.86 in IEEE-14, SVM benefits significantly from PCA and improves the accuracy of the classification, while KNN is best suited for SMOTE and PCA conversion. The findings show that PCA contributes more than SMOTE to the overall performance of the model. However, SMOTE improves recall but can introduce false positives and is therefore a compromise of accuracy. This study highlights machine learning as a scalable and powerful alternative to traditional contingency analysis, which improves the assessment of security in real time.

Prompt tuning provides a parameter-efficient way to adapt foundation models (FMs) by freezing the pretrained backbone and updating only a small set of learnable prompts. This property makes prompt tuning especially suitable for decentralized federated learning (DFL), where exchanging full-model updates can be prohibitively expensive. However, prompt tuning in DFL introduces new challenges. Prompt sets learned from heterogeneous local data may not be index-wise aligned, making standard decentralized averaging unsuitable. In addition, the algorithm should be theoretically guaranteed to achieve consensus and make progress toward the shared objective. In this work, we provide the first study of prompt tuning in DFL. We formulate decentralized prompt tuning as a Wasserstein-based optimization problem over prompt measures, which captures the set-valued structure of prompts. We then propose D-FROST, an optimal-transport-based (OT-based) decentralized prompt-tuning algorithm that merges neighborhood prompts into compact representative prompt sets through transportation-based matching. We further analyze D-FROST by bounding the Wasserstein consensus error across clients, and establishing convergence of the network-level prompt barycenter to a neighborhood of stationarity. Experiments under heterogeneous client data demonstrate the effectiveness of D-FROST for decentralized prompt tuning.

Generative data augmentation is widely used to mitigate class imbalance, yet its theoretical effect on downstream generalization remains poorly understood. In this work, we develop a statistical framework for conditional generative augmentation and analyze its impact on classification risk. We formalize augmentation as a distribution-mixing process and show that the resulting risk distortion is controlled by both the augmentation strength and the class-conditional Wasserstein discrepancy between real and generated distributions. We further derive a capacity-dependent generalization bound based on Rademacher complexity, revealing an explicit trade-off between hypothesis complexity, augmentation intensity, and generative fidelity. Empirically, we evaluate the framework on binary and multiclass imbalanced classification tasks using Conditional GAN and Conditional WGAN-GP augmentation. Across datasets, CWGAN-GP consistently achieves lower Wasserstein discrepancies than CGAN, indicating improved distributional fidelity. However, improved fidelity does not necessarily translate into superior classification performance, with classical oversampling methods often remaining competitive. These findings support the central theoretical prediction that augmentation reliability is governed by distributional approximation error rather than predictive performance alone. Overall, this work establishes generative augmentation as a distributional perturbation process whose reliability can be quantified through Wasserstein-based measures and supported by finite-sample generalization guarantees. The proposed framework provides a principled foundation for evaluating synthetic data quality beyond classification accuracy alone.

Spurious correlations pose a significant challenge to the robustness of modern machine learning. The inherent imbalance in dataset distributions often leads traditional Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) models to rely on majority spurious attributes for classification, resulting in poor performance on minority groups. This problem becomes particularly challenging when the spurious attributes are unavailable. Existing group-label-free methods often upsample minority groups or misclassified real training examples; repeating the same instances can reduce effective diversity and encourage overfitting. To mitigate these spurious correlations from a data-centric perspective in the absence of prior knowledge, we introduce Subpopulation-Aware Generative Enhancement (SAGE), a two-stage generative augmentation framework. Using cluster-derived sub-labels and class labels, we fine-tune a conditional generative model and text encoder, generating targeted synthetic data to fill underrepresented regions in the training set and construct a balanced validation set for last-layer reweighting. We experimentally show that SAGE achieves 89.5%, 85.7%, and 79.1% worst-group accuracy on Waterbirds, CelebA, and MetaShift, respectively, outperforming the best group-label-free baselines by up to 7.7 percentage points.

Post-hoc out-of-distribution detectors are fitted on a finite reference set, so every score they produce is an estimate. If we had chosen a different set, some verdicts would have moved. We measure that movement by resampling the reference set and recording the bootstrap standard deviation of the score, which we call verdict instability. It admits a closed form with no fitted parameters. The instability of a verdict is the within-class dispersion of the assigned class along the query's direction, divided by the square root of that class's reference count. That count is what separates verdict instability from the geometry of the score distribution, and it is identifiable only under class imbalance. Instability grows with the local dispersion. Far-OOD queries lie along the low-variance directions of an anisotropic embedding, so every distance-based score we test assigns its highest values to the verdicts that are most reproducible. Only estimators of local dispersion carry the sign a practitioner expects. We give a rule that predicts this sign for any score from a single label-free correlation, and abstention driven by a wrong-signed score turns out worse than abstention at random on every dataset we test.

Attributes describing data content and context can induce diverse imbalance patterns that go beyond label imbalance alone. However, existing studies primarily address label imbalance while overlooking data attributes, such as topics and demographics, which can induce meaningful subgroup structure while causing model degradation on underrepresented subgroups. We propose Attribute-Agnostic Imbalance Augmentation (AIA$^{2}$), a framework for improving model robustness under varying subgroup imbalances without explicit subgroup annotations. AIA$^{2}$ automatically discovers varying imbalances via latent semantic distributions, obtains slices with both learning difficulty and subgroup imbalance deficits, and deploys a large language model (LLM) for subgroup-aware imbalance augmentation. We have evaluated AIA$^{2}$ on 5 popular corpora with rich domains and their attribute values, covering social issues and diverse topics. Results show improved performance on the lowest-performing subgroups and consistent gains over competitive baselines. Ablation studies confirm complementary contributions from each component, and additional analyses show that AIA$^{2}$ provides a practical and consistent way to improve worst-group robustness under data subgroup imbalance. Code is available at https://github.com/trust-nlp/AIA2-Subgroup-Robustness.

University students experience disproportionately high rates of common mental health conditions, such as depression, which can impair learning, social functioning, and overall well-being. Although lifestyle interventions such as mindfulness and physical activity can reduce the symptoms, many do not achieve symptomatic remission. Developing new approaches to identify students with poor outcomes could enable earlier and more targeted intervention. Machine learning (ML) methods have increasingly been used to predict remission in depressive patients. However, these ML models often suffer from class imbalance, where there may be an unequal proportion of people in the remitted group relative to the non-remitted group. This imbalance can reduce model accuracy and bias predictions. To address this, studies commonly employ the popular oversampling strategy SMOTE. However, SMOTE has a notable limitation: it may generate invalid synthetic minority samples. In a clinical context, these false positives can lead to incorrect risk stratification, potentially delaying necessary escalated care for patients unlikely to remit. In this paper, we introduce a novel and effective oversampling method that addresses this shortcoming. Our approach leverages the variance function of a Gaussian process to estimate the uncertainty of generated minority samples to reduce false positives. We validate our method on a depression dataset collected from university students and demonstrate that it is better than existing oversampling approaches in predicting remission (i.e., treatment outcome). By improving the reliable identification of non-responders, our method provides a robust computational tool to help clinicians rapidly pivot to adjunctive therapies, thereby personalizing and optimizing mental health care pathways.

Multiple-choice benchmarks are widely used to evaluate large language models, but MCQ scores conflate knowledge with sensitivity to option order, which makes them unreliable measures of model knowledge. In this paper, we test whether preventing a model from seeing option labels while committing to an answer removes positional influence and, in turn, improves performance. We evaluate two different strategies for mitigating bias. The first uses a generation-then-matching approach, and the second scores options in isolation, which is positionally unbiased by construction. Neither reliably improves accuracy. A complete decomposition shows that the bottleneck is withholding options, not the matching step. The only configuration that consistently matches the baseline is the one that shows the model all options paired with an LLM matcher. However, eliminating positional influence entirely still does not reliably yield accuracy gains, while cyclic permutation often improves them. For two-stage prompting, an aggregate measure of recall imbalance and a direct per-question measure of order sensitivity both fail to show reliable debiasing.

Long-tailed classification poses a reliability challenge because models trained on imbalanced data are unevenly reliable across frequent and underrepresented classes. While existing methods address imbalance through re-balancing, adjustment, representation learning, or multi-expert modeling, they rarely estimate which expert should be trusted for each class. This paper proposes CLEAR (Class-wise reLiability-aware Expert Aggregation for long-tailed Recognition), a modular ensemble framework for long-tailed classification. CLEAR generates diverse experts through threshold-based structured sampling while preserving the full label space, then estimates a class-wise trust score for each expert using a smoothed class-wise precision formulation. During inference, expert predictions are combined through class-wise generalized product-of-experts aggregation, allowing different experts to be emphasized for different classes. Experiments on CIFAR-100-LT, ImageNet-LT, and Places-LT across multiple backbones show that CLEAR achieves competitive overall accuracy and particularly strong few-shot performance. These results support class-wise expert reliability as a useful design principle for long-tailed ensemble learning.

Hierarchical Text Classification (HTC), as a critical text mining task, faces challenges such as complex label hierarchies and class imbalance. Existing methods based on large language models (LLMs) struggle to be efficiently applied to this task due to issues like lengthy prompts and loss of label structural information. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a weakly supervised HTC framework enhanced by LLM-based data augmentation. The framework first enriches the label hierarchy semantically through keyword generation and corpus mining, thereby enhancing the model's understanding of labels. Subsequently, it guides the LLM to generate pseudo-samples to mitigate the long-tail problem, and employs a Gaussian mixture model for confidence-based resampling to optimize the quality of generated data. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method effectively improves the reliability of LLM-generated pseudo-labels and significantly enhances classification performance on fine-grained and imbalanced datasets.

Adversarial training under long tailed distributions suffers from a dual imbalance: the class imbalance skews the training objective toward head classes, and the adversarial inner maximization may further amplify this bias. Existing methods mitigate this issue by correcting class priors or adapting class wise robust supervision, yet they treat each class in isolation and fail to identify which boundaries drive long tailed collapse. We propose a Confusion Geometry Rebalancing method (CGRm) for long tail adversarial training, a plug in framework that leverages directed robust errors as training signals. CGRm leverages periodic robust evaluations to derive source class loss weights, class wise robust coefficients, and a directed confusion geometry graph. The method then couples feedback weighted robust optimization with graph guided margin correction, thereby boosting the robustness of vulnerable classes and sharpening the critical boundaries that drive long tailed performance degradation. Experiments on long tailed benchmarks show that CGRm achieves consistent robust performance gains over existing methods, with ablations validating the contribution of each component. We provide the code in the supplement.

Unsupervised domain adaptation is a widespread set of methods that leverages the knowledge of a labeled source domain to train a model to perform well on a related unlabeled target domain. They generally introduce an auxiliary adaptation-related task that can be integrated into the multitask paradigm, which aims to merge multiple single-task models into a unified architecture. In this paper, we propose to associate domain adaptation and multitask balancing in the realistic context of an extreme class imbalance. Therefore, we propose a combined framework to cover and validate these approaches, and evaluate its performance in the physics-based context of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO). Along with a comparative study of some relevant adaptation techniques, we highlight the impact of extreme label shift and extend the investigations on importance weighting to rectify it. The complete code and results are published and available as open-source resources on Zenodo.

In a federated learning setup for GANs, several adversarial attacks are possible. One such attack is label flipping, in which malicious clients deliberately alter label information during local training in order to manipulate the global generator. The objective of this attack is to skew the learned generation distribution so that samples conditioned on a target label are instead mapped to a source class. In this work, we investigate the effectiveness of label flipping attacks in federated GANs through both theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation. We further consider an oversampling based variant, in which malicious clients upweight poisoned samples during local training to amplify their influence on the aggregated global model. We quantify the resulting distributional shift by computing the Kullback Leibler divergence between the clean and poisoned class conditional distributions, and show both analytically and on FEMNIST, MNIST, and CIFAR10 that the semantic damage of the attack grows linearly in the effective poisoning strength while deviation from the true target distribution grows only quadratically, making the attack effective yet difficult to detect from label agnostic metrics.

Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed client devices while preserving data privacy. However, FL faces significant challenges due to data heterogeneity, particularly in terms of label distribution skewness and variations in dataset sizes, which can lead to biased model updates and hinder convergence. To address this, we propose FedTVD, a novel FL algorithm that weights client contributions during aggregation by considering both data quality and quantity. Unlike traditional FL approaches such as FedAvg, which rely solely on dataset size for client weighting, FedTVD integrates Total Variation Distance (TVD) to measure the divergence between each client's local label distribution and a uniform global distribution. Clients with highly skewed distributions receive lower weights, preventing unbalanced datasets with imbalances from disproportionately influencing the global model. At the same time, dataset size is incorporated to ensure scalability and fairness. This dual-weighting mechanism effectively mitigates the impact of data imbalance, leading to more stable and generalized global models. Experimental results show that FedTVD consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across all datasets (FMNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100) and all levels of data heterogeneity. Notably, it achieves up to 10.6% improvement over FedAvg on CIFAR-10 under highly skewed data, while maintaining top performance even under moderate and IID settings.

Medical image classification often suffers from class imbalance due to the inherent disparities in disease incidence. Existing approaches, such as class resampling and loss reweighting, mainly improve learning within the observed feature distribution, but do not explicitly enlarge the latent support region of tail classes. As a result, tail-class representations remain overly compact and are easily encroached upon by head classes, leading to biased decision boundaries. In this work, we propose Recurrent Contrastive Learning (RCL) for imbalanced medical image classification. RCL progressively expands the support region of tail classes by recurrently reusing historical feature states across training phases. Specifically, we adopt DINOv3 with LoRA adapters as the backbone to provide robust feature embeddings. We then devise a Temporal Memory Queue (TMQ) to preserve corpus-level features across training phases and provide diversified global references for contrastive learning. Based on TMQ, we construct Temporal Anchors (TARs) to form an anchor field around tail classes. This field enlarges the support region of tail classes, suppresses head-class encroachment, and improves inter-class separation. Extensive experiments on three imbalanced medical datasets demonstrate that RCL achieves consistent improvements over strong baselines. The code is available at https://github.com/dndins/RCL.

Data imbalance poses a major challenge in supervised classification, where the majority-class bias contributes to false negatives and overestimates classification accuracy. Unsupervised deep clustering can be immune to class imbalance because representation learning for clustering is performed without class labels. Deep clustering has been proposed for images, languages, and graphs, while its application to tabular data has only emerged recently. This paper is among the first to examine the performance of state-of-the-art deep clustering methods under varying levels of data imbalance. We introduce two novel cluster ensemble approaches: one aggregates deep clustering assignments across different embedding dimensions, and the other applies majority voting to the best-performing clustering algorithms. Experiments on 16 binary tabular datasets with varying and artificially induced levels of imbalance reveal distinct strengths of different deep clustering methods. On average, our ensemble methods outperform individual clustering methods in ACC, NMI, and ARI scores, offering greater resilience to data imbalance when identifying ground-truth classes without supervision. Therefore, in an imbalanced data scenario, deep clustering can serve as a strong alternative to supervised classification.

Airborne surveillance from low Earth orbit is hindered by two interconnected bottlenecks: nanosatellites have a limited downlink budget, yet the conventional approach still transmits terabytes of raw imagery to the ground for processing, and open satellite datasets for aircraft are scarce and severely class-imbalanced. These limitations either delay timely decision-making or prevent standard detectors from learning robust representations of rare aircraft classes. In this paper, a workflow that combines on-board inference with generative data augmentation is proposed to address both limitations jointly. Inference is executed on a 6U CubeSat equipped with a low-power edge tensor accelerator, while a diffusion model fine-tuned through low-rank adaptation generates synthetic minority-class imagery. This synthetic output is automatically annotated, pseudo-labelled, by an intermediate detector and merged with classically augmented samples. The results show that the balanced dataset increases global mean average precision from 77.9% to 82.2%, with the minority class rising from F1=0.683 to F1=0.811, and that the quantised detector fits the on-chip memory and projects 25-30 frames per second on orbit. This approach contrasts with the conventional bent-pipe architecture, in which the satellite acts as a passive data collector. Therefore, the computational tests support the proposed workflow as a decision-support tool for real-time, autonomous airborne surveillance from nanosatellites.

Deep learning models in computer vision face significant challenges when trained on long-tailed datasets, where a few majority classes dominate while many minority classes are severely underrepresented. Such imbalances frequently arise in real-world scenarios such as rare species recognition, manufacturing fault detection, and medical image understanding, leading to biased models that underperform on tail classes. Existing reweighting methods typically rely on static class frequencies to penalize the model, ignoring the dynamic nature of how effectively a network actually learns a class over time. We address this by introducing a novel Learning-Dynamics Aware Loss (LDAL) function that shifts the focus from static sample counts to dynamic learning progress. LDAL framework adjusts class weights continuously by leveraging: (i) the strength of learned feature representations (semantic scale), (ii) the intrinsic learning difficulty of each class, measured via the Shannon entropy of its predictions, and (iii) an inter-epoch regularizer term that tracks prediction shifts between consecutive epochs to stabilize training and avoid local minima. LDAL is purely a objective function which incurs negligible computational overhead while adapting to the feature learning of the model. Experimental results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly surpasses state-of-the-art reweighting loss functions, providing an optimal trade-off between accuracy and generalizability. The source code is available at https://github.com/sdm2026/ldal

Transaction propensity prediction in B2B e commerce presents unique challenges distinct from B2C contexts, primarily due to the heterogeneous procurement behaviors of organizational entities, which violate SMOTE's implicit assumption of within class feature homogeneity. Specifically, B2B buyers exhibit multi modal procurement cycles that render linear interpolation between minority class samples structurally invalid, producing synthetic data that does not represent real purchasing behavior. This paper introduces a production deployed propensity modeling framework designed to address these complexities through two primary contributions. First, we replace conventional SMOTE based augmentation with a synthetic data generation approach leveraging Diverse Counterfactual Explanations (DiCE). This method produces minority class samples with superior distributional fidelity compared to SMOTE, as validated through quantitative proximity analysis and UMAP cluster visualization. Second, we adapt the PyPARC piecewise affine classification framework to generate calibrated propensity probabilities, facilitating the interpretable segmentation of customers into actionable risk tiers. Evaluated on two years of longitudinal data from a large scale B2B e commerce platform with a 1 to 9 class imbalance ratio, the proposed architecture achieves 93.1% precision at a decision threshold of 0.8, a 9.2 percentage point improvement over SMOTE based baselines at the same threshold (83.9%), and a 26.1 point improvement over SMOTE at threshold 0.7 (66.04%), demonstrating consistent superiority across operating points. These results demonstrate the framework's efficacy in enabling high precision marketing campaigns with significant improvements in customer activation and return on investment.

We study imbalanced crowdsourcing with a focus on class-dependent annotator accuracy, a setting that, to the best of our knowledge, remains relatively underexplored despite its importance in real-world inspection systems where the labels of greatest operational importance are also the rarest ones. In this setting, annotators may be reliable on both classes, unreliable on both classes, majority-class specialists, or minority-class specialists. Existing models only partially address this problem: they either capture class-dependent errors but ignore item difficulty, or they model item difficulty without capturing class-dependent errors. To fill this gap for imbalanced datasets in crowdsourcing, we introduce a generative aggregation model combining item difficulty with class-dependent annotator competence. The model allows both annotator abilities and item difficulties to vary across classes. We then revisit Condorcet's Jury Theorem in the class-imbalanced setting. We also show that majority voting asymptotically preserves the underlying class proportion. We evaluate our model on $33$ real-world crowdsourcing datasets, covering multiclass tasks such as images and text, as well as two large-scale regimes: large-scale annotation datasets, with many annotations per item, and large-scale item datasets, with a large number of annotated instances. Across these diverse settings, our model consistently achieves the highest minority recall while remaining competitive in balanced accuracy, making it particularly relevant when rare-label recovery is the primary objective.

In this paper, we examine the difficulties of using standard techniques for medical image classification due to long-tailed distributions (wherein rarer conditions have very few samples) resulting in bias towards diagnosing common diseases and away from rarer diseases. We then discuss and implement deep learning models with techniques such as augmentation to minimize error, especially from rarer diseases. We evaluate various different models with AP, F1 score, AUROC, and loss (all on the validation set). We conclude with the promising results from our best model, and potential applications in the healthcare space.

Anomaly detection is inherently characterised by severe class imbalance, making the interpretation of evaluation metrics challenging. Although metrics such as AUROC, AUPR, F1-score, and MCC are widely used, their values convey different meanings depending on the anomaly ratio. In this work, we analyse the behaviour of those four common anomaly detection metrics under varying levels of imbalance. We focus on the study of metric landscapes, visualisations that relate metric values to true positive and true negative rates, providing an intuitive view of metric preferences and stability. Our analysis offers practical guidance for interpreting and comparing anomaly detection results across datasets with different imbalance ratios.

Models trained on long-tailed data using standard softmax tend to exhibit higher training error and a larger generalisation gap for classes with fewer training samples. We characterise this class-wise disparity as the preference issue and quantify it using a new metric, the model imbalance level $I$. To understand this issue, we analyse how imbalanced training data adversely affects class-wise gradients under standard softmax training. This paper then develops a finite-data Generalised Balanced Softmax (GBS) framework for analysing and mitigating the preference issue. The framework uses the training-time logit adjustment $z_{nc}+β\log|N_c|$, which is algebraically identical to the training-time logit-adjusted loss of Menon et al. (2021) when $τ=β$. The case $β=1$ also coincides with Balanced Softmax and with the unit adjustment supported by the Fisher-consistency argument under the true data distribution, corresponding to an idealised infinite-data setting. Building on this existing loss family, this paper uses a heuristic power-law assumption to motivate the adjustable coefficient and studies how $β$ affects trained models. Across the evaluated long-tailed benchmarks, $β=1$ does not attain the highest average testing recall on most datasets, showing that a different coefficient can be preferable when training on finite data. The selected values of $β$ reduce $I$ and improve average testing recall relative to the $β=1$ reference, while retaining negligible computational overhead and compatibility with existing representation-learning frameworks.

Semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds faces severe class imbalance, yet the effectiveness of specialized imbalance-aware methods from 2D computer vision remains unclear in 3D contexts. We systematically evaluate 11 imbalance mitigation approaches across datasets with extreme (641:1) and moderate (56:1) imbalance ratios, revealing a surprising finding: standard cross-entropy with uniform weighting achieves competitive performance, typically within 0.8-3.3% mIoU of specialized methods across architectures and datasets. Through multifaceted mechanistic analysis of error patterns, decision boundaries, and the geometry of the optimization landscape, our analyses suggest that imbalance severity shapes the topology, creating narrow solution basins under extreme imbalance and flat plateaus under moderate imbalance. This appears to constrain the effectiveness of loss-level modifications, as all methods must navigate these geometric constraints. Our findings offer practical guidance; standard cross-entropy provides a robust baseline, with specialized methods offering modest improvements (0.8-3.3% mIoU) that vary by architecture and dataset but risk substantial degradation if poorly tuned. This work provides the first mechanistic explanation for why techniques proven effective in 2D do not readily transfer to point-based 3D point cloud segmentation, validated across two representative architectures.

For two decades, the standard remedy for class-imbalanced learning has been to fabricate synthetic minority examples, and the standard evidence of their validity has been a check that cannot fail: synthetic points are scored against the very data that generated them. We de-bias the check. Validity becomes a population quantity -- the probability that a synthetic point truly belongs to the minority class -- with a consistent estimator that scores synthetic points against withheld real data. Where held-out ground truth is available, the classical test underestimates true invalidity in 96-99% of method-by-imbalance-ratio cells, while the de-biased estimator tracks it closely. We prove validity is a property of the data, not the method: class overlap sets an invalidity floor no faithful generator escapes, making oversampling redundant where classes separate and invalid where they overlap. Across 91 methods, three classifiers, and datasets spanning medicine and finance -- including a generator engineered to pass the classical check -- none clears both bars: gains over the best trivial baseline are noise-thin (median below 0.01 F1, a decision threshold's reach), and most damage calibration. We release the audit as a pip-installable test and flip the burden of proof: synthetic minority data must now demonstrate, on the data at hand, both validity and information gain.

Imbalanced regression problems arise when the target variable has an asymmetric distribution, resulting in underrepresented value ranges in the dataset. Traditional approaches for identifying rare instances rely on a relevance function that assigns higher importance to specific regions of the target distribution. However, the effectiveness of imbalance-aware learning methods depends strongly on how relevance is defined. In more complex scenarios, such as bimodal distributions, traditional relevance functions struggle to capture rarity, as they assign fixed relevance values based solely on target values, thereby compromising the distinction between truly rare and normal instances. To address these limitations, this study proposes an Instance Hardness-based relevance function (InHaR) for identifying rare instances in regression problems. Unlike traditional relevance functions, the proposed approach incorporates learning difficulty, allowing rarity to be inferred not only from the target distribution but also from the difficulty of instances for the learning algorithm. This property is particularly important in bimodal scenarios, where rarity cannot be accurately inferred from target values alone. Experimental results demonstrate that the InHaR correctly identifies rare regions under bimodal distributions and, when used to guide resampling strategies such as Random Oversampling (RO) and Gaussian Noise (GN), leads to significant improvements in predictive performance compared to traditional relevance-based approaches. The code, dataset, and further details about the proposed method are publicly available at https://github.com/VitorLeitao/instance-hardness-Imbalanced-regression.

Supervised learning models in the predictive maintenance field are regularly trained on highly imbalanced industrial datasets: machine failures occur rarely but have a disproportionate effect on operations. In addition to the clear class disparity, failure data are typically non-homogeneous, with different failure modes arising from distinct physical processes and exhibiting a multimodal distribution across minorities and classes. Traditional imbalance-management methods, e.g., undersampling, SMOTE-based interpolation, or cost-sensitive learning, typically assume that the minority population is homogeneous. This means their effectiveness is severely limited in the multifaceted conditions encountered in industrial practice. This paper determines the possibility of a failure-type-conscious generative augmentation program to improve the identification of infrequent failures in predictive maintenance systems. An experimental design that is leakage-safe is used to compare five imbalance-handling methods: cost-sensitive learning, random undersampling, SMOTE oversampling, single-generator GAN augmentation, and a specialized multi-generator GAN architecture that has independent generators that are asked to learn individual failure subtypes. Precision/Recall-oriented measures are used to quantify model performance; the main evaluation measure is the PR-AUC. Experiments conducted on the AI4I 2020 predictive maintenance dataset indicate that the proposed multi-generator GAN framework produces more realistic minority samples, yielding higher PR-AUC and recall scores compared to traditional resampling methods and individual-generator GAN augmentation.

Breast MRI is highly sensitive for detecting breast tumors, but exams contain many slices and require substantial reading time. Deep learning models often perform well on internal splits but can fail across institutions because of domain shift and dataset-origin bias. We study this failure mode for binary breast MRI tumor classification. EfficientNet-B3 and WaveViT-Small are trained using Duke Breast Cancer MRI and fastMRI, and evaluated only on the independent multi-center MAMA-MIA cohort. In a deliberately confounded setup, where label is perfectly correlated with dataset origin, external accuracy is near chance (0.5048--0.5265), despite very high recall. We then construct a mixed training set in which each class contains samples from both Duke and fastMRI, while preserving patient-level splitting, augmentation, and leakage controls. On MAMA-MIA, dataset mixing improves accuracy/F1 to 0.8463/0.8625 for WaveViT-Small and 0.8884/0.8994 for EfficientNet-B3. These results show that controlling dataset-origin bias is important for reliable breast MRI classification.

Bit-serial accelerators exploit bit-level sparsity to reduce DNN inference cost, but existing designs exploit sparsity on only one operand, bounding the speedup. Extending sparsity exploitation to both operands simultaneously yields compounding reductions in partial products but introduces a critical new bottleneck: workload imbalance. Because each concurrent weight - activation pair's execution cost depends on the product of two independently varying operand non-zero bit counts, pairs that must complete together finish at vastly different times, leaving faster computations idle. We show this limits PE utilization to 56 - 64% in existing dual-sided designs. We present BRIM, a hardware - software co-designed dual-sided bit-serial sparse accelerator that directly targets this bottleneck. BRIM combines two integrated mechanisms: 1) Cyclic-Balanced Pruning (CBP), a post-training weight optimization that reshapes weight representations based on profiled activation statistics to equalize expected workloads across concurrently processed pairs offline; and 2) Pairwise Slot Donation, a lightweight hardware mechanism that absorbs residual runtime imbalance with negligible area overhead. Evaluated across CNNs, ViTs, and LLMs under iso-area constraints, BRIM achieves over 90% PE utilization, up to 2.37x speedup, and up to 1.63x energy efficiency improvement over prior dual-sided designs.

As with most ``in the wild'' collections of the natural world, the North America Camera Trap Images (NACTI) dataset exhibits long-tailed class imbalance, with the largest class covering over 50% of its 3.7M images. Building on the PyTorch Wildlife model, we systematically evaluate Long-Tail Recognition (LTR) methodologies to benchmark species recognition performance, including specialised loss functions and LTR-sensitive regularisation. Our optimised configuration achieves state-of-the-art 99.40% Top-1 accuracy on the NACTI test split, significantly outperforming standard baselines and previously reported top performances. To assess robustness under domain shifts (e.g., night-time captures, occlusion, motion-blur), we extend our evaluation across three independent reduced-bias test sets (including ENA-Detection, Caltech Camera Traps and Missouri Camera Traps). Across these out-of-distribution (OOD) evaluations, our LTR-enhanced model consistently demonstrates substantially stronger generalisation capabilities compared to standard cross-entropy approaches. However, qualitative and quantitative analyses underline that current LTR optimisations cannot fully overcome representational bottlenecks, resulting in catastrophic predictive breakdown for rare `Tail' classes under severe domain shift. For maximum reproducibility, all dataset splits, key code, and network weights are published with this paper at https://github.com/ZehuaLiuY/Species-Classification.

Imbalanced learning addresses predictive modeling problems with underrepresented regions of the data distribution. Although widely studied in classification, imbalanced regression remains challenging because of continuous target variables and heterogeneous density distributions. Existing data-level methods often rely on fixed target partitioning or synthetic sample generation without jointly considering density variations and local feature-space structure. We propose DADIR, a Density-Aware Data-level Imbalanced Regression framework that exploits density information throughout the balancing process. DADIR comprises three components: (1) Density-Aware Adaptive Partitioning (DAAP), which recursively partitions the target space according to density variations; (2) a Density-Regularized Conditional Variational Autoencoder (DR-CVAE), which preserves sparse-region representations while learning latent features; and (3) latent-space data balancing, which combines feature-level clustering with oversampling to generate structurally consistent synthetic samples. Together, these components identify minority regions more effectively, preserve sparse-region information, and generate realistic synthetic data. The resulting balanced dataset can be used directly with existing regression models without modifying their architecture or learning objective. Experiments on diverse imbalanced regression datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in predictive performance, particularly in underrepresented regions, while also improving overall accuracy.

Fine-grained offensive language detection organizes labels into a hierarchical structure, for which two modeling paradigms exist: cascaded decomposition and joint multi-task modeling. Prior work rarely provides a direct, controlled comparison of the two paradigms in terms of accuracy, parameter count, and inference latency, and rarely verifies whether a chosen class-imbalance handling strategy is actually optimal. This paper proposes a three-level cascaded detection system whose training strategy is customized per subtask, together with two verification mechanisms. First, a controlled ablation study determines the best class-imbalance handling strategy for each subtask. Second, a joint multi-task model with a shared encoder is trained as an architectural control, yielding real measurements along the dimensions of accuracy, parameter count, and inference latency. Experiments show that the cascaded system attains macro-F1 scores of 0.795, 0.716, and 0.557 on the three subtasks of the official test set. The ablation study reveals that configuring the loss function purely by imbalance-severity intuition is suboptimal; reconfiguring based on the ablation results improves both performance and stability. End-to-end cascade evaluation shows that roughly one-fifth of the errors in the cascade pipeline originate from the first-stage filter and cannot be corrected by subsequent stages. Relative to the joint multi-task model, the cascaded architecture achieves higher accuracy on all three subtasks, with a 7.1-point macro-F1 gain on the most severely imbalanced subtask, at the cost of three times the parameters and 1.67 times the inference latency. Together, these results establish an explicit, quantifiable trade-off between the accuracy advantage of cascaded architectures and their deployment cost.

Oversampling is widely used to address class imbalance in tabular classification, but existing methods can distort the feature importance ranking underlying model explanations. Although recent studies have quantified this distortion by comparing real and synthetic data, none have actively sought to prevent it. In this paper, we introduce Kendall-constrained Importance-Preserving Oversampling (K-IPO), a generator-agnostic, "generate-then-select" framework that preserves the original data's feature importance ranking during augmentation. K-IPO iteratively generates minority-class candidates and accepts them only if their inclusion maintains a user-defined minimum Kendall's tau (τ) correlation with the reference ranking. Optionally, stricter constraints can be applied to the highest-ranked features. We evaluated K-IPO on 20 imbalanced binary classification datasets using three classifiers and multiple explanation methods. In most cases, K-IPO achieved the best or tied-best results in feature importance preservation, explanation consistency, and class separability. It also generally improved predictive performance while maintaining competitive computational overhead.

In real-world applications, node classification on graphs often faces the challenge of class imbalance, where majority classes dominate training, resulting in biased model performance. Traditional GNNs often struggle in such scenarios, as they tend to overfit to majority classes while underrepresenting minority classes. Existing solutions, which either prioritize nodes based on class size or synthesize new nodes for minority classes, often fall short of effectively addressing this imbalance issue. This paper introduces an approach to class-imbalanced node classification by utilizing a balanced meta-set for importance measurement, where a training node is considered significant if it enhances model performance under an unbiased setting. Our method identifies important nodes that can counteract class imbalance and utilizes them for model training, allowing for fine-grained and dynamic node selection throughout the training process. We theoretically derive a formula to directly assess node importance, reducing computational overhead and providing an intuitive threshold for node selection. Guided by this metric, we develop a novel framework that filters valuable labeled, unlabeled, and synthetic nodes that enhance model performance in an unbiased context. A key advantage of this framework is its separation of the synthetic node generation process from the filtering process, ensuring compatibility with various node generation methods. Furthermore, we introduce a strategy to construct a high-quality meta-set that closely approximates the overall feature distribution, ensuring robust representation of each class. We evaluate our framework, NodeImport, across multiple datasets using popular GNN architectures, demonstrating its superiority over existing baselines. Our results highlight the flexibility and effectiveness of the framework in mitigating class imbalance, leading to improved outcomes.

Classifying cybersecurity vulnerabilities using the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) taxonomy is challenging due to extreme class imbalance and strong hierarchical dependencies among weakness categories. Although oversampling techniques such as Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN) are widely adopted to mitigate class imbalance, their effectiveness for hierarchical CWE text classification remains largely unexplored. This paper proposes a Hierarchy-Aware RoBERTa framework that explicitly incorporates CWE structural information through learnable parent-class embeddings, preserving taxonomic consistency. Our experiments demonstrate that synthetic interpolation in high-dimensional embedding spaces violates the inherent parent-child constraints of the CWE hierarchy, offering only marginal benefits for classical ML models while consistently degrading deep learning architectures. Evaluated on a CWE Research Concept dataset, the proposed model achieves a weighted F1-score of 0.76 without data augmentation, outperforming all baselines with notable gains on minority classes, including the Class category whose F1-score improved from 0.40 to 0.60 over the BERT baseline. Our results suggest that hierarchy-aware representation learning is a more principled alternative to oversampling for structured vulnerability classification.

We study robust generalization under spurious correlations: tasks where a shortcut feature is correlated with the true label in training but anti-correlated in an adversarial held-out split. Varying the spurious ratio $r$ (the fraction of training examples where shortcut = true label) and model capacity, we find a counterintuitive result: data imbalance promotes generalization in sufficiently capable models. On a synthetic task where the true label is sum parity of an integer sequence and the shortcut is the parity of the maximum-valued element, a 2-layer, 2-head transformer generalized (reached $100\%$ adversarial accuracy) in 0% of seeds at $r{=}0.50$ but 77% of seeds at $r{=}0.90$. The effect is absent in 1-layer models, where imbalance instead traps the model on the shortcut. Through mechanistic analysis -- gradient conflict dynamics, circuit evolution, and QK/OV circuit ablations -- we characterize a mechanistic pathway consistent with imbalance promoting generalization.

Financial anomaly detection suffers from extreme class imbalance, causing traditional single-objective algorithms to exhibit ``fraud collapse'', defaulting to the majority class and failing to balance anomaly interdiction with customer friction. To overcome this without distortive data resampling, we propose the Semantic Pareto-DQN, a multi-objective reinforcement learning framework. Our approach synthesizes heterogeneous transaction features into cohesive natural-language narratives, encoded by large language models, thereby producing a robust, scale-invariant state representation. The agent optimizes a vectorial reward that explicitly decouples financial efficacy, operational friction, and semantic discovery. By mapping the continuous Pareto frontier, the system dynamically navigates the asymmetric costs of missed anomalies versus false positives. Empirical evaluations across E-Commerce fraud and UCI Credit datasets show that semantic Pareto-DQN successfully shatters the zero-recall trap. It achieves superior minority-class recall compared to scalarized baselines, providing an alternative to trade bounded operational friction for financial anomaly discovery.

Cervical cytology classification models are typically evaluated on curated, class-balanced benchmarks, but real-world liquid-based cytology (LBC) collections are often small and class-imbalanced. This paper presents a class-imbalance-aware and calibration-aware ensemble classification study on the Mendeley LBC dataset, using its native four-class Bethesda taxonomy (NILM, LSIL, HSIL, SCC) rather than a collapsed binary formulation. Three lightweight architectures (Swin-Tiny, TinyViT-5M, DenseNet121) are trained directly on Mendeley LBC using weighted random sampling to counteract class imbalance, and compared against two soft-voting ensembles (Hybrid-2, Hybrid-3). Post-hoc temperature scaling is fit on a held-out calibration subset carved out of the training portion of each cross-validation fold, distinct from both the training data used to fit model weights and the evaluation fold used for final metrics, avoiding the optimistic calibration estimates that result when the same data is used for both purposes. Calibration substantially reduces expected calibration error, Brier score, and negative log-likelihood for every model and ensemble configuration tested, while discrimination metrics (accuracy, macro-F1, macro-AUROC) remain essentially unchanged. Ensemble size shows no consistent additional reliability benefit over the best individual model once all configurations are properly calibrated. Confusion matrices show that all classification errors, across every configuration, are confined to the boundary between high-grade lesions (HSIL) and carcinoma (SCC); no errors involve the negative (NILM) or low-grade (LSIL) categories. These results suggest that, for this dataset, calibration is the dominant lever for reliability, not ensemble size, though this conclusion should be read in light of the dataset's modest size.

Long-tailed recognition methods often modify losses, margins, or representations to reduce the dominance of frequent classes. We ask whether, after Balanced Softmax training, the remaining tail error can be reduced by retraining only the classifier. We evaluate BS-cRT, a two-stage procedure that trains a backbone and cosine classifier with Balanced Softmax, freezes the backbone, and updates only the classifier on balanced episodic batches. The second stage keeps the empirical-prior Balanced Softmax objective and uses raw cosine logits at inference. Across CIFAR-100-LT, CIFAR-10-LT, ImageNet-LT, and Places-LT, this classifier-only step consistently improves Few-shot accuracy over the matched Balanced Softmax checkpoint. At imbalance factor 100, Few-shot gains are +5.15 points on CIFAR-100-LT and +5.83 on CIFAR-10-LT; on ImageNet-LT and Places-LT, gains are +6.92 and +9.78 points, respectively, with a Top-1/Few-shot trade-off on ImageNet-LT. We also analyze Counterfactual Boundary Risk Minimization (CBRM), a boundary-probe extension using prototype-based features near decision boundaries. CBRM identifies two failure modes: scaled-logit cosine margins destabilize training, and corrected hardest-negative probes remain head-class anchored. The results support BS-cRT as a practical classifier-side baseline and indicate that boundary supervision must account for class frequency.

Class imbalance poses a fundamental challenge in risk-sensitive applications such as fraud detection and medical diagnosis, where minority-class samples are scarce yet critical for accurate classification. Existing oversampling methods generate synthetic samples to rebalance class distributions; however, they often produce large numbers of low-quality candidates that distort decision boundaries or introduce artifacts, leading to overfitting and degraded generalization. In this work, we introduce RUBRIC, a generator-agnostic filtering framework that formulates synthetic sample selection as a quality-over-quantity optimization problem. RUBRIC ranks candidates using a realism-utility trade-off: realism is quantified by a learned discriminator that distinguishes real samples from synthetic samples, while utility captures proximity to the decision boundary through a concave margin-based scoring function. We show that, under mild regularity conditions, the proposed filtering strategy monotonically tightens the generalization bound for margin-based classifiers by jointly reducing distribution shift and suppressing near-negative tail contributions. Through extensive experiments on credit-card fraud detection and other imbalanced benchmarks, we demonstrate that RUBRIC improves F1-macro and recall while maintaining comparable ROC-AUC across several generators. We also provide explicit lambda-sensitivity analysis to show how users can recover AUPRC when ranking quality is prioritized.

Data scarcity and class imbalance are persistent challenges in machine learning that degrade model generalization and introduce predictive bias. We present a hybrid quantum-classical framework for synthetic data generation using a Quantum Circuit Born Machine (QCBM) to address these limitations. The proposed approach exploits quantum mechanical properties -- superposition and entanglement -- within a parameterized variational quantum circuit to model complex probability distributions that are difficult for classical generative methods to capture. Experiments are conducted on two tabular benchmark datasets: the Iris dataset and the Telco Customer Churn dataset. Preprocessing includes normalization and PCA-based dimensionality reduction to enable efficient basis encoding for quantum circuits. The QCBM is trained by minimizing Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between real and generated data distributions using a gradient-based parameter-shift optimization rule. Augmenting training data with QCBM-generated synthetic samples at 40-50% of the minority class improves F1-score by approximately 5-15% and minority-class recall by 10-25%. Cross-domain evaluations (Train on Synthetic, Test on Real; and Train on Real, Test on Synthetic) reveal a performance gap of only 3-10%, indicating strong distributional fidelity. Comparative analysis against classical oversampling methods -- SMOTE, Borderline-SMOTE, KMeansSMOTE, and SVM-SMOTE -- shows that QCBM achieves competitive classification performance and produces lower Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) on the Telco dataset, suggesting superior structural similarity in certain imbalanced settings. These findings establish QCBM as a viable complementary tool for data augmentation, particularly for low-dimensional structured tabular data with class imbalance.

Safety-critical perception systems must reliably detect rare object classes within small label spaces, a setting that long-tailed detection methods, designed for hundreds of classes with dense annotation, fundamentally do not address. Open-vocabulary detectors offer a promising alternative, as they use natural language queries at inference time, making prompt quality a first-class lever for detection performance. We exploit this property to address class imbalance: rather than retraining models or collecting additional annotations, we ask whether iteratively refining the language prompts, fed to frozen detectors, can improve minority class detection. We introduce C-GAP Caption-Guided Augmentation and Prompting), a detector-agnostic, annotation-free framework that operates in two phases. First, we establish a composite caption baseline combining per-image scene descriptions with class-quantity context, which we show outperforms scene-description only or class-quantity-only prompts across multiple open-vocabulary architectures and benchmarks. Second, an LLM iteratively refines each image's caption individually, with trials triaged into accept, tentative, or regenerate buckets based on minority-class AP@0.5 against a dynamic threshold derived from the composite baseline. Refinement terminates early once sufficient AP@0.5 gain is achieved. No detector weights are updated at any stage. Our experiments shows that C-GAP improves minority-class average precision up to 53% over the baselines. On COCO, C-GAP improves minority-class AP@0.5 by ~81% relative over the composite baseline (17.69 -> 32.09). Experiments confirm that composite captions provide the critical foundation for effective refinement: using scene-description-only or class-quantity-only prompts as the refinement starting point yields diminishing returns, supporting both stages of C-GAP as necessary contributions.

Agentic language models must learn when to call tools, when to consume tool responses, and when to answer directly. This makes multi-teacher on-policy distillation a natural training strategy: one teacher can specialize in tool calls, another in direct responses, and the student can learn from both on its own generated distribution. We show that this strategy can induce a behavior shift that is invisible from aggregate losses alone. In a two-teacher tool-use setting, vanilla generalized knowledge distillation improves tool-call recall but also moves the model toward over-calling, where it calls tools on examples that should be answered directly. Aggregate explanations are insufficient: tool-call samples do not receive more token exposure, and full-sequence per-token divergence is not larger for the tool-call teacher. We instead analyze behavior leverage imbalance: local token-level signals at mode- entry and structural positions, such as <tool_call> and function names, can have disproportionate control over the global generation mode. We propose Soft Clamp, a per-token divergence calibration method that dynamically compresses extreme token-level Jensen-Shannon divergence while preserving nonzero gradients. On APIGen-MT, Soft Clamp reduces over-calling from 13.7% to 9.0% relative to vanilla GKD while matching its decision accuracy. In a BFCL multi-turn diagnostic, it also lowers tool-call loops and repeated calls among GKD variants. These results suggest that multi-teacher OPD should monitor where teacher signals act, not only how large they are in aggregate.

Conformal prediction is being adopted in drug discovery to put an honest number on model reliability: pick an error rate alpha, and the method returns prediction sets containing the true label with probability at least 1 - alpha. We show this guarantee can be dangerous on imbalanced datasets. Across four datasets, standard (marginal) conformal prediction hits its global 90% coverage target while leaving the minority class badly exposed: realized minority coverage falls to 64.8% on blood-brain-barrier penetration and to 4.2% on clinical-trial toxicity, where the rare class is nearly abandoned. The failure is not tied to one model: a random forest, a graph network, and a frozen chemical language model all reproduce it (p < 0.001 in every case), with severity tracking baseline calibration on rare labels rather than architecture. A conservation identity explains the effect: the minority's shortfall equals the majority's surplus amplified by the imbalance ratio, predicting the measured gap to within one point and ordering severity across datasets. The failure survives realistic scaffold splits and a second conformal score, while aggregate accuracy and overall coverage stay reassuringly high, which is exactly why it is easy to miss. Class-conditional (Mondrian) conformal prediction closes the gap on every dataset, restoring minority coverage to target for a modest increase in prediction-set size. We localize the failures to generic molecular scaffolds - plain benzene and pyridine cores occurring in both classes - propose a one-number diagnostic, and show with a cost model that abstaining on affected compounds flips a screening campaign from net-negative to net-positive utility. Our contribution is demonstrating on real chemistry how severe and invisible this known conformal-theory gap becomes under imbalance, and laying out a practical protocol restoring per-class reliability.

In chest X-ray (CXR) classification, acceptable ranking performance can still leave rare-positive patients below threshold, especially within subgroups. We study this pre-deployment fairness problem as an audit question: after a long-tailed multi-label CXR model is converted from scores into decisions, who is missed? Across VinDr-CXR and MIMIC-CXR/CXR-LT, we use a diagnostic ladder to separate class-level long-tail losses, subgroup-aware weighting, group robustness, and threshold selection. On VinDr-CXR, group-tail weighting followed by tail-aware thresholding reduces tail FNR from 0.665 to 0.269, sex worst-group FNR from 0.705 to 0.157, and age worst-group FNR from 0.822 to 0.133, while macro-mAP increases from 0.611 to 0.635. On MIMIC-CXR/CXR-LT, the same score-to-threshold comparison reduces tail FNR from 0.866 to 0.741 and lowers worst-group FNR across sex, age, race, and insurance; residual missed-positive rates nevertheless remain high. Paired bootstrap contrasts on VinDr support the thresholded FNR reductions, and GroupDRO reference runs indicate that aggregate group robustness alone does not remove rare subgroup misses in this setting. The study supports a narrow audit claim: rare-label fairness in CXR depends jointly on the finding, subgroup, and operating threshold, not on label frequency or ranking metrics alone.

For clinical deployment, it is essential that automated diagnostic systems remain reliable when confronted with previously unseen cases, yet deep models routinely misclassify out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs with high confidence, underscoring the need for more robust OOD detection methods. Although substantial effort has been devoted to improving model robustness, most of the existing literature assumes balanced datasets, evaluates OOD detection on coarse or non-clinical OOD sources, or lacks comprehensive assessment across diverse OOD scenarios. To address the gaps, we propose a novel methodology trained on diverse and imbalanced medical datasets and evaluated across a clinically reflective OOD spectrum. Our framework comprises three key components: (1) a Nonlinear von Mises-Fisher (NvMF) classifier capable of learning non-linear decision boundaries, with theoretical proof of its asymptotic connection to cosine classifiers; (2) a multi-expert framework in which margin-aware NvMF classifiers specialise in different regions of label distribution to better handle imbalance; and (3) an outlier expert trained explicitly to distinguish inlier from outlier data, thereby strengthening OOD detection. Evaluation on RFMiD, ISIC2019, and NCTCRC datasets demonstrates consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods, achieving mean FPR95 reductions of 8.45%, 13.02%, and 36.90% respectively. These gains are further supported by comprehensive ablations that validated the contributions of each component. This enables reliable identification of unfamiliar cases for deferral to clinicians, supporting safer AI-assisted diagnosis in real-world workflows. Our code is available at https://github.com/redboxup/MARVEL.

Classifying heterogeneous omics data remains a fundamental challenge in computational biology, particularly in high-dimensional, small-sample settings where nonlinear interactions dominate and class imbalance further complicates reliable prediction of minority phenotypes. While traditional kernel methods rely on feature abundance, they fail to leverage the known interaction landscapes of biological systems. In this work, we propose a structured Gaussian process classification framework that integrates graph-encoded biological pathways directly into the kernel construction. By propagating information along known interaction networks and combining this with abundance-derived features, the resulting classifier captures both quantitative measurements and topological context. We benchmark our proposed methodology on three publicly available gut and fecal microbiome datasets. To address severe class imbalance, we evaluate complementary strategies, including data-level resampling, threshold calibration, and confusion-matrix-based adjustments, and report minority-class performance alongside accuracy. The hybrid approach yields a performance gain over unstructured baselines and matches the performance of established benchmarks for similar datasets. Furthermore, the probabilistic nature of the framework naturally provides calibrated predictive uncertainty, enabling robust differentiation between confident predictions and ambiguous samples.

Anomaly detection is a critical and evolving field in Machine Learning, with applications targeting different domains such as cybersecurity, finance, healthcare, manufacturing and IoT (Internet of Things) systems. Traditionally, anomaly detection algorithms have been designed using both supervised and unsupervised learning paradigms. The fundamental challenge in real-world anomaly detection scenarios is related to the inherent class imbalance (anomalies are typically rare) and, for supervised methods, to the scarcity of labelled anomalous data. Indeed, labelling is both expensive and time-consuming. Conversely unsupervised methods do not require labelling, but may suffer from high false positive rates when deployed in safety-critical applications. In this work we introduce a novel unsupervised algorithm for anomaly detection in time series based on the Haar discrete wavelet and a suitably designed $t$-test. We establish the theoretical foundation of the proposed $t$-test and, through extensive experimentation across 343 datasets, demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art unsupervised and self-supervised benchmarks.

Class imbalance poses a critical challenge in federated learning (FL), where underrepresented classes suffer from poor predictive performance yet cannot be addressed by standard centralized techniques due to privacy and heterogeneity constraints. We propose FedCGNM (Federated Class-Grouped Normalized Momentum), a client-side optimizer in FL that partitions classes into a small number of groups based on minimum within-group variance, maintains a momentum per group, normalizes each group momentum to unit length, and uses the summation of the normalized group momentums as an update direction. This design both equalizes gradient magnitude across majority and minority groups and mitigates the noise inherent in rare-class gradients. We further provide a theoretical convergence analysis explicitly accounting for time-varying resampling-rates. Additionally, to efficiently optimize these rates in small-client regimes, we introduce FedHOO, an X-armed-bandit (XAB) based algorithm that exploits federated parallelism that evaluates many combinations of two candidate rates per client at linear cost. Empirical evaluation on four public long-tailed benchmarks and a proprietary chip-defect dataset demonstrates that FedCGNM consistently outperforms baselines, with FedHOO yielding further gains in small-scale federations.

Chest X-ray multi-label classification is a core task in intelligent medical imaging diagnosis. However, real clinical data often exhibit extreme long-tailed distributions, leading to degraded performance on rare diseases in tail classes. This issue is not only driven by data scarcity but also by two intrinsic factors:1) attenuation of tail-class lesion representations under complex anatomical backgrounds, and 2) dominance of head classes in modeling label co-occurrence relationships. To address these challenges, we propose TRCGL-Net. First, a learnable text-guided conditional diffusion model is employed to generate high-quality tail-class chest X-ray image samples under disease semantic constraints, improving data diversity and realism of rare disease patterns while alleviating class imbalance and preserving pathology-consistent semantics.Second, a channel reweighting mechanism is introduced to perform feature recalibration by emphasizing disease-relevant feature channels, thereby improving feature discriminability under long-tailed distributions.A class-aware attention mechanism is further applied to generate class-specific attention maps, enabling the model to localize disease-relevant regions and focus on fine-grained lesion areas.Finally, a graph convolution network based on label co occurrence is introduced to establish an information propagation mechanism among categories. Experiments on the PadChest dataset show that the proposed method achieves a tail-class mAP of 0.4904, an overall mAP of 0.4408, and an mAUC of 0.8989, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. TRCGL-Net effectively improves recognition performance for rare diseases under long-tailed distributions and mitigates the impact of extreme class imbalance in chest X-ray multi-label classification.

For predictive models, the often-reported performance metrics are the loss and accuracy. In synchronous Brain- Computer Interface (BCI) systems, these metrics are informative for most BCI paradigms; however, for Event-Related Potential (ERP) applications the spelling rate, which measures the number of characters correctly selected is more important as it influences the estimation of information transfer rate (ITR) and any related metric measuring spelling performance. Moreover, ERP-based BCIs hold imbalanced data class distributions, which require reporting metrics that can handle the imbalance, such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC). In this work, we study the correlation of the spelling rate with 13 metrics to identify which among them best reflect user spelling performance and how they are affected by trial repetition. The Results of two datasets (a private LARESI ERP dataset and the public OpenBMI ERP dataset) favor the Brier score, Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and the metrics that account for class imbalance in binary classification: ROC AUC, area under the Precision-Recall curve (PR AUC), Average Precision (AP), and partial AUC (pAUC). These findings encourage researchers and practitioners to report those metrics in ERP-based BCI experiments.

Recursive Feature Machines (RFMs) are a class of kernel machines that utilize the Average Gradient Outer Product (AGOP) as a mechanism for feature learning. They have been shown to effectively replicate the learning dynamics and feature representations of Feedforward Neural Networks (FNNs) across various settings. However, despite comparable capacity for feature learning and the similarities in the features they acquire, RFMs exhibit significantly lower performance than neural networks in certain data-corrupted scenarios. In this work, we investigate these limitations in mathematical problems. As a solution, we introduce a remarkably effective transformation applied to the training labels which promotes learning in noisy, complexly represented, and class-imbalanced data. This simple yet powerful adjustment enables RFMs to close the performance gap with FNNs and, in some cases, even surpass them.

Staff absenteeism imposes substantial operational costs in high-demand work environments such as healthcare, emergency services, meat processing, construction, and courier and delivery services, where proactive workforce planning depends on reliable individual-level absence prediction. Existing regression and classification approaches share a structural limitation; they map features observed at time t to labels at the same time t, reproducing already-realised outcomes rather than predicting future events, and discard the sequential behavioural structure inherent in individual attendance histories. We propose a Time Series Classification (TSC) framework that separates historical attendance sequences from future absence labels, enabling genuinely proactive prediction. Due to the lack of public longitudinal attendance data, we construct a reproducible simulated dataset calibrated to the UCI dataset. We analyse Binary Focal Loss (BFL) and Geometric Mean (G-Mean) loss under severe class imbalance using only the imbalance ratio $ρ$. For BFL, the initial gradient ratio is $ρα/(1-α)$, implying the balanced weight $α= 1/(1+ρ) \approx 0.023$. Experiments show that performance is governed mainly by $α$, with BFL achieving specificity 0.813 and balanced accuracy 0.888, comparable to G-Mean. Unlike BFL, G-Mean adapts automatically without parameter calibration. Among three deep learning architectures evaluated, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and the hybrid LSTM-Fully Convolutional Network (LSTM-FCN), the LSTM-FCN delivers strong precision and specificity. Stable performance is obtained with batch sizes >= 64 and window sizes between 40-80 days, yielding balanced accuracy of approximately 80% on held-out test data.