Linguistics

Part-of-speech tagging for low-resource languages remains challenging due to limited annotated data, especially for linguistically complex languages. Gaidhlig (Scottish Gaelic) is a morphologically rich and endangered language with limited digital resources, making it suitable for examining a lightweight language processing approach. This paper describes using the modular spaCy Natural Language Processing framework to build part-of-speech taggers for Gaidhlig using the Annotated Reference Corpus of Scottish Gaelic. We train two models with minimal pre-processing and configuration: one using a fine-grained tagset and another using a reduced coarse-grained tagset. Both models are trained without external embeddings or pre-trained language models, using only supervised learning from the available corpus. The fine-grained model achieves 88.6% tagging accuracy, while the coarse-grained model achieves 93.7%. The results are comparable to those of the two previously published Gaidhlig taggers, indicating that simple, off-the-shelf language processing pipelines can demonstrate good performance in low-resource and morphologically complex linguistic settings.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved significant success in speech-to-text translation (S2TT). However, when processing multilingual speech inputs, a single speech encoder shared across all languages suffers from the curse of multilinguality: languages at different resource levels compete for limited representation capacity, leading to strong high-resource performance but substantial degradation on low-resource speech. To address this problem and improve multilingual consistency, we propose MSRT, a novel framework built around a resource-aware Mixture of Speech Encoders (MoSE). MoSE uses an explicit language router to assign each utterance to an appropriate expert encoder. A frozen expert preserves high-resource language capabilities, while a trainable expert adapts to and specializes in medium- and low-resource languages. We further introduce a five-stage curriculum learning strategy that substantially reduces data dependence, requiring only 10 hours of paired S2TT data per language for effective alignment. We conduct extensive experiments on 45 languages, systematically evaluating all $45 \times 44$ translation directions. Our 4B-parameter model achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming substantially larger baselines. Empirical analyses show that MoSE improves high-, medium-, and low-resource languages simultaneously, with the largest gains on low-resource speech, thereby breaking the curse of multilinguality without compromising high-resource performance. To support future multilingual S2TT research, we release our code and models.

3D Language Gaussian Splatting embeds open-vocabulary language features into 3D Gaussian Splatting, providing an efficient explicit representation for text-driven 3D scene understanding. However, existing methods are limited to indoor or small-scale scenes, and tend to fail in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) outdoor scenes, where severe occlusions and long distance viewpoints often lead to incorrect semantic activations and missing target responses. In this paper, we present OutLangSplat which adapts language Gaussian representations to UAV outdoor scenes by improving feature representation and aggregation reliability. For the feature representation, a 2D-3D dual-branch representation with region-based alignment and fusion is designed to improve spatial consistency, reducing incomplete target responses and background misactivations. For the feature aggregation, we introduce a training-free contribution and consistency-aware Gaussian feature aggregation strategy that leverages pixel contribution reliability and cross-view semantic consistency to suppress unreliable responses from noisy viewpoints. A new dataset is provided by manually annotating various objects on four real-world public UAV outdoor scene datasets. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first accessible dataset of open-vocabulary 3D scene understanding for UAV outdoor scenes. Quantitative evaluations and ablation studies demonstrate that OutLangSplat outperforms SOTA methods on both open-vocabulary semantic segmentation and instance localization tasks. The datasets and codes will be open-sourced.

Translating wordplay across languages has long challenged both professional translators and machine translation systems. We investigate three approaches to translating puns from English to French by combining large language models with linguistic constraints for wordplay generation. Our baseline uses a large language model with feedback from a discriminator prompted with positive and negative French examples. Our guided reasoning pipeline uses combined phonetic-semantic embeddings to retrieve lexical candidates for wordplay generation. Finally, our multi-agent framework iteratively evaluates and regenerates candidate translations using specialized feedback. Moving beyond literal translation, our objective is to preserve the linguistic creativity, ambiguity, and humor of the source-text wordplay rather than simply reproduce its vocabulary. The multi-agent and guided chain-of-thought systems ranked first and second, respectively, in the CLEF JOKER 2025 Task 2 competition under expert human evaluation, despite only modest improvements in BLEU and BERTScore. These findings suggest that both explicit phonetic-semantic guidance and iterative multi-agent evaluation can improve LLM-based wordplay translation relative to direct discriminator-guided generation, particularly when balancing semantic fidelity, phonetic similarity, and natural target-language expression

Fifteen years ago, Low proposed that pun translators should stop searching for equivalent words and instead search for new points of contact between sound and meaning. In this paper, we investigate that idea computationally. We model pun translation as a process of discovery, exploration, and selection. A retrieval system searches semantic and phonological neighborhoods for target-language affordances: sound-meaning bridges that may support new wordplay. Multiple language models then explore these opportunities by generating competing translations, while a multi-perspective generate-and-rank architecture selects among them. Beyond system development, our primary contribution is an analysis of how retrieved affordances propagate through the translation process. We find that generators actively exploit retrieved opportunities, evaluators progressively concentrate around stronger sound-meaning bridges, and exact phonological collisions are selected at disproportionately high rates when available. At the same time, many puns still yield no usable affordances, suggesting that retrieval remains the central bottleneck in computational pun translation. The resulting picture is remarkably close to the process envisioned by Low. Successful pun translation emerges not from preserving source-language words, but from discovering new places in the target language where sound and meaning collide.

This paper presents a conceptual framework for developing an electronic explanatory dictionary of the Tajik language using large language models (LLMs). The relevance of the work stems from the absence of a comprehensive digital lexicographic resource for Tajik that is comparable in functionality to dictionaries for high-resource languages, and from the limited adaptation of modern natural language processing technologies to low-resource language systems. Based on a systematic survey of existing linguistic, statistical, and corpus resources, we propose a dictionary architecture that integrates modules for morphological analysis, lemmatization, semantic clustering, and dictionary entry generation using LLMs. The choice of subword tokenization is justified by the agglutinative nature of Tajik morphology and its high morphological variability, along with a parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) strategy suitable for limited annotated data. The novelty of the work lies in proposing the first holistic conceptual architecture of an explanatory dictionary for Tajik that unifies classical lexicographic methods, language statistics, and generative capabilities of LLMs into a single system. The practical significance of the study is the formation of a methodological foundation for developing a full-featured electronic dictionary that can serve both as a lexicographic tool and as a core resource for machine translation, automatic summarization, sentiment analysis, and other applied NLP tasks. The paper is intended for specialists in computational linguistics, lexicography, and developers of natural language processing systems working with low-resource languages.

Multilingual evaluations report accuracy at a single output-token cap, but languages need different numbers of tokens to express the same content, so the cap is a hidden experimental variable. We test whether the native-vs-translate gap on MGSM (German, Thai, Swahili) is a token-budget artifact for Qwen3-8B and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct under four prompting strategies. The measured gap swings by up to 57 points across budgets, length normalization moves it by up to 38.9 points where the cap binds, and at tight caps normalization can reverse which strategy scores higher. We prospectively froze the sweep's three Qwen peaks and its near-zero value at 1024 and evaluated them on 540,000 independently hard-capped decodes: a second frozen family of six Holm-corrected tests rejects every null. The frozen test at $B^*=1024$ still fails to reject because native accuracy has already saturated there; above saturation, the residual difference is a strategy-performance gap, not an identified reasoning deficit. The same truncation channel prices a cost-ordered adaptation ladder: a cross-fitted Thai vocabulary extension closes 0.0 points of the gap at the frozen budget and 4.9 points where 19% of traces still truncate. A third frozen family varies only the announced budget at a fixed enforced cap; announcing 128 rather than 2048 tokens moves Thai native accuracy by 5.1 points, so accuracy is not a function of the enforced cap alone. A correct-emission timing identity computed from one long-cap run matches the three pre-specified MGSM peaks to 0.65 points and, in an exploratory Qwen-only analysis of three further benchmarks, tracks held-out items to 0.92 points, locating the peak exactly in five of seven cells. Treat the output cap as an independent variable and report accuracy across the budget regime, not at a single budget.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to provide conversational practice for English-as-a-second-language (ESL) learners. Effective ESL tutoring, however, requires more than fluent response generation: a tutor must select an appropriate pedagogical action based on learner behavior and dialogue context. Human-tutoring research offers principles for adaptive support, but they are often task-specific and remain insufficiently integrated into LLM-based ESL tutor training and evaluation. We present TACT (Taxonomy-Aligned Conversational Tutor), a human-grounded framework for post-training and evaluating pedagogically adaptive ESL tutors. Drawing on established literature, we develop two complementary taxonomies: the Tutor-Strategy Taxonomy with 13 tutor response strategies and the Student-Move Taxonomy characterizing learner behavior by move type and status. Using these taxonomies, we construct TACTCorpus, which enriches 260 authentic teacher-student conversations with 32,379 annotations and quality-controlled augmented training data. We then post-train Qwen3.5-4B through supervised fine-tuning followed by taxonomy-aligned Group Relative Policy Optimization, producing TACTutor and optimizing it for scaffolding quality rather than reference imitation alone. On TACTBench, a strategy-balanced diagnostic benchmark comprising 78 authentic tutoring contexts, TACTutor improves over its backbone by 20.30% and outperforms all evaluated proprietary baselines under the same protocol, while maintaining backbone performance on established external educational benchmarks; in a blinded study with 50 learners, it also receives the highest overall mean rating among the evaluated tutors. We release the data, benchmark, and model weights, providing an open foundation for developing pedagogically adaptive ESL tutors.

Geospatial reasoning, i.e., computing distances, containment, and other spatial relations over real-world entities, is central to navigation and logistics, yet large language models (LLMs) struggle with the required geometric and topological computation despite storing considerable geographic knowledge. Existing benchmarks localize these failures only partially: they are synthetic or smallscale, largely monolingual, and offer limited control over geographic coverage. We introduce MultiGlobeQA, a multilingual benchmark of 46,060 question-answer pairs spanning 14 spatial-function families and 15 answer formats, with execution-based ground truth over three knowledge graphs. It covers 201 countries and territories via income- and density-stratified sampling, with parallel questions in English and 16 additional high- and low-resource languages. Across parametric, reasoning, and agentic settings, LLMs collapse on tasks requiring grid indexing and shape computation, while topological relations and directions fare best. Retrieval and tool use yield considerable gains, yet performance plateaus below two thirds even when gold facts are supplied, indicating that computation, not access to knowledge, is the bottleneck. Models also underperform on low-income regions, a gap that gold facts widen rather than close.

Multilingual language models are deployed across a hundred or more languages, yet most benchmarks test whether a model can perform a task in a language rather than whether it commands the language itself, conflating fluency with proficiency. We introduce M-GATE (Multilingual Grammar, Accuracy in Translation, and Efficiency), a benchmark of linguistic proficiency spanning 30 typologically diverse languages from high- to low-resource. M-GATE comprises three tasks: grammatical error detection on linguist-crafted, adversarially selected sentences that turn on hard, language-specific phenomena; round-trip translation of shared English sources across 29 target languages, scored by a three-provider LLM judge panel validated against professional annotators; and a supplementary tokenizer-efficiency measure. We evaluate over 50 models in more than 80 configurations. Fluency and proficiency come apart sharply: models that translate competently sit near chance on the adversarial grammar items, the best reaching a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of only 0.36, and their errors lean systematically toward under-flagging, accepting ungrammatical text rather than raising false alarms. Translation quality closely tracks a language's share of pretraining data (r = 0.86 against log Common Crawl share), producing a steep low-resource penalty that is nonetheless narrowing with successive model releases. Enabling reasoning reliably improves translation, while its effect on error detection is smaller and for some models negative, so the best configuration is task-dependent. To resist contamination, test items are kept private behind a continuously updated public leaderboard, with illustrative examples released (https://m-gate.ai).

Multilingual multi-agent systems exhibit substantial degradation beyond English, yet prior work rarely identifies how task-critical information is lost when user requests are converted into executable plans. We study the planner in a multi-agent system as the request-to-action interface and derive an actionable taxonomy of planning-grounding failures from failed real-world task executions. LLM-based analysis shows that these failures constitute an increasing share of unsuccessful executions as language-resource availability declines, with the strongest effects in low-resource languages. To test whether the taxonomy supports mitigation, we introduce TART, Taxonomy-Guided Actionable Representation, that makes the taxonomy's key aspects explicit to the planner and downstream sub-agents. Across multiple languages, three LLM backbones, two datasets, and two agentic configurations, TART consistently improves performance. On multilingual GAIA, it raises a state-of-the-art system's accuracy by 5.6 percentage points averaged across eleven languages spanning low- to high-resource settings.

Modern LLM-based ASR systems have established multilingual capability as a standard feature, leveraging large-scale multilingual corpora and LLMs' cross-lingual knowledge to achieve competitive performance across multilingual benchmarks. However, jointly modeling languages with heterogeneous acoustic, phonological, and lexical characteristics inevitably introduces optimization conflicts, undermining language-wise specialization. To address this challenge, we propose Language-Specialized Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation (LS-MOPD), which decouples language-specific knowledge acquisition from multilingual capability integration: language-specialized teachers are independently optimized via reinforcement learning (RL), with their expertise then integrated into a generalist multilingual student through language routing and token-level multi-teacher distillation, thereby reducing direct cross-lingual optimization conflicts. We further explore static and dynamic acoustic-prefix configurations to examine how teacher-student prefix consistency influences the efficacy of on-policy distillation. Experiments on benchmarks covering Mandarin, Mandarin subdialects, Cantonese, and English demonstrate that LS-MOPD substantially outperforms RL baselines and surpasses the empirical performance envelope defined by the best-performing RL teachers on nearly all benchmarks, revealing its potential to generalize beyond all teachers in multilingual ASR.

Historical language change affects morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, yet computational studies typically examine these levels with incompatible representations and therefore cannot determine whether they evolve together across languages. We address this problem by asking how the magnitude and direction of change vary across linguistic levels, languages, and historical periods within a single analytical space. We introduce ChronoLens, a framework that combines frozen multilingual language models, feature-aligned crosscoders, and post-hoc linguistic interventions, and apply it to 44.98 million documents and approximately 17.2 billion tokens from five parliamentary traditions spanning 1803--2026. The resulting sparse representations agree substantially more strongly with linguistic statistics than dense embeddings or a pooled sparse autoencoder ($ρ=0.72$ versus $0.29$ and $0.28$), and reveal that morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics generally change by comparable amounts within a language, while languages differ markedly in when, how far, and in which direction they change. These findings show that historical language change is a structured, multidimensional process: similar magnitudes can conceal different trajectories, and meaningful cross-linguistic comparison requires measuring both distance and direction.

Constructed languages (conlangs) are intentionally created human languages with a rich tradition of linguistic creativity. Despite their potential for studying language learning in large language models (LLMs), existing conlangs remain largely underexplored in LLM research. We present ConlangBench, the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating and training LLMs on 21 existing conlangs. We collect over 21M conlang-English parallel sentence pairs (including 430K pairs across the 20 non-Esperanto conlangs) and 321K vocabulary entries. In bidirectional translation experiments, we find that models perform better on a posteriori conlangs, whose vocabularies are derived from natural languages, reflecting the design characteristics of conlangs. Training on ConlangBench also shows that models can learn all eight conlangs for which sufficient parallel corpora are available, while their learning curves vary depending on how the conlangs were created. Our findings suggest that conlangs provide a unique testbed for investigating how LLMs acquire low-resource languages.

The adoption of large pre-trained multilingual models for neural machine translation (MNMT) faces a major challenge: excessive memory and computational consumption due to overly large vocabularies and embedding layers. Although existing compression methods like pruning, quantization and knowledge distillation reduce parameter redundancy, they mainly preserve the structure of the original vocabulary, thereby leaving a major source of inefficiency unresolved. We propose in this paper a general optimization framework that combines a vocabulary pruning method with a targeted fine-tuning protocol for MNMT models. We evaluate the proposed framework using three models (M2M100, NLLB-200, mBART-50) on the English-Arabic language pair. Our approach reduces the vocabulary size from over 128,000 to approximately 10,000 tokens, enabling a 60% memory saving without any loss in performance. Results show that optimized multilingual models can match or exceed the performance of dedicated bilingual baselines. In particular, the pruned and fine-tuned M2M100 model achieves a competitive BLEU score of 42.04 (against 44.59 for the OPUS-MTen- ar bilingual model) while it significantly outperforms it on the COMET metric (0.8730 vs 0.7911) revealing superior semantic adequacy and fluency.

Multilingual large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform better on non-English classification tasks when the representations of the given language are more aligned to English within the model. Several cross-lingual alignment (CLA) scores have been proposed for use with LLMs, along with multiple approaches for extracting embeddings from the models. We provide a comparative analysis of 27 CLA score variants, examining how they differ and how well each predicts downstream performance across three tasks. Crucially, while LLMs are widely used for generative tasks such as machine translation, prior work has focused almost exclusively on classification. We therefore investigate whether CLA scores are similarly predictive of translation performance. To enable computing correlations across target languages, we propose a PMI-based translation metric, which is less dependent on the target language and correlates strongly with chrF. We find that CLA with English predicts translation quality comparably to or better than source-target CLA, providing new evidence that LLMs use English as an internal pivot language.

Human-interpretable computer-aided diagnosis is crucial for clinical decision making. Concept-based models excel by providing transparent reasoning and enabling post-hoc, clinician-in-the-loop interventions. However, their rigid dataset-specific adaptation inherently restricts cross-site generalization. Applying them across diverse modalities, such as dermoscopic and clinical photographs, is challenging due to heterogeneous concept taxonomies varying in availability, granularity, and semantics across cohorts. Consequently, adapting Foundation Vision-Language Models (FVLMs) demands costly label engineering and repeated post-training. Existing intervention mechanisms remain rigidly tied to predefined concepts, lacking adaptability and hindering scalable dermatology CAD deployment. To address these bottlenecks, we propose UniCon, an open-linguistic unified concept learning framework for multimodal interpretable vision-language diagnosis. UniCon resolves these challenges through three contributions: (1) A shared semantic representation space via a unified concept prototype codebook, seamlessly coordinating heterogeneous concept systems across modalities without dataset-specific retraining. (2) Open-linguistic based multi-faceted semantic specifications to overcome sparse textual label limitations, improving boundary sensitivity in uncertain clinical contexts. (3) A robust, cross-site adjustable intervention interface powered by reliability-gated bottleneck aggregation, enabling consistent reasoning and transferable clinician corrections. Extensive experiments demonstrate that beyond securing top-tier diagnostic accuracy, UniCon successfully bridges disparate clinical taxonomies, unlocking unprecedented cross-site intervention capabilities. Code is available at https://github.com/wuchengyu123/UniCon.

Foundation models place language throughout embodied agents, but its presence does not show what it contributes or how well that contribution is grounded. This survey separates these two questions. We define five non-exclusive functional roles for language: Specification, Embodied Representation, Action Orchestration, Grounding Regulation, and Execution Coupling. For each role, we trace the path from linguistic content to its embodied consumer and identify the observations or interventions that can test the claimed responsibility. Applying this framework to the reviewed literature reveals a recurring gap between functional use and evidential support. Interpretable or revised linguistic intermediates may be incorrect, go unused, or fail to affect later behavior. Even when actions are directly conditioned on language, system-level success does not by itself isolate language's contribution. We therefore evaluate grounding claim by claim, asking whether the reported evidence supports the specific responsibility assigned to language. Using role claims rather than architectures as the unit of comparison allows us to compare modular and end-to-end embodied agents without extending conclusions beyond the reported evidence.

We audit five frontier large language models on native Bangla derogatory speech (gali) across six protocols to test a single hypothesis: Comprehension-Containment Decoupling. We propose that contemporary safety alignment is bound to high-resource surface forms rather than harmful meaning, causing a model's capacity to comprehend a low-resource slur and its capacity to contain it to operate independently. Every protocol corroborates this hypothesis against a human-calibrated baseline (kappa = 0.84). At baseline, models exhibit a 7.92 percentage point comprehension deficit in Bangla while maintaining an identical 92.83% token leakage rate across both languages. Severity calibration tracks surface anatomical cues over compositional harm (+4.00 error on mild slang; -2.00 on threats), while apparent containment gains under orthographic perturbation prove to be a tokenizer-driven "containment mirage." Crucially, explicit Chain-of-Thought reasoning rescues comprehension (94.72% Pass) while systematically dismantling containment (96.23% Use). Furthermore, expert-persona framing collapses refusal to 6.57%, revealing that keyword-based filters ignore dehumanizing communal slurs entirely. Our findings demonstrate that high-resource benchmarks cannot certify low-resource safety, necessitating meaning-grounded containment.

Multilingual dense retrieval aims to handle queries and documents across different languages based on a unified retriever model. The challenge lies in enabling robust retrieval transfer to low-resource languages where annotated retrieval data is often scarce. Although previous studies transfer high-resource supervision to low-resource languages in multilingual semantic representation learning, the shared representation often entangles semantic and linguistic features, which may interfere with optimizing semantic relevance for retrieval. Different from existing methods that focus on learning language-agnostic semantic features under such entanglement, we propose a disentangled contrastive learning~(DCL) method for multilingual dense retrieval by separating multilingual representations into semantic and linguistic subspaces. Specifically, we design disentangled optimization objectives based on hierarchical semantic alignment and language debiasing contrastive learning. By aligning retrieval-relevant semantics across languages at both sentence and token levels while capturing language-specific variations in the linguistic subspace, these objectives reduce language-induced interference in semantic matching. We jointly optimize them with the retrieval objective to facilitate stable zero-shot transfer from English supervision to multilingual dense retrieval. Extensive experiments on mMARCO and MIRACL show that our method consistently outperforms several strong baselines, demonstrating its effectiveness and generalization ability.

Group conversations are fundamental to human collaboration, yet standard large language models (LLMs) still struggle with the complexities of multi-party interaction. This challenge persists in part because existing group conversation datasets are often limited to short-term lab settings with contrived tasks, failing to capture the long-term social dynamics of real-world teams. To bridge this gap, we introduce TIDES, a high-resolution longitudinal dataset tracking 12 university project teams over a full semester. Comprising 75,971 utterances in both English and Korean from in-person meetings, TIDES provides a naturalistic record of teams working on self-managed projects. Our socio-structural annotations-covering interaction types, emergent roles, and development stages-allow for modeling of team evolution over months. Experiments show that fine-tuning on TIDES improves next-speaker prediction by 13.8 percentage points over a bigram baseline (64.53%) and yields performance comparable to strong proprietary zero-shot models. The model also comes within 2.1 percentage points of the published state of the art on the AMI Meeting Corpus while using approximately 42% less training data. However, human evaluations suggest that better next-speaker prediction does not necessarily yield more natural or coherent utterances, as fine-tuned models were generally less preferred than vanilla models. This potential mismatch motivates further study of how structural modeling can support natural multi-party generation.

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly evaluate human writing in high-stakes domains such as hiring and academic assessment, putting non-native speakers at particular risk. Drawing on the language attitudes framework, we compared human and LLM evaluations of parallel L1- and L2-written Japanese emails on three dimensions: fluency, status, and solidarity. Japanese raters rated L2 texts significantly lower on all three dimensions, with a fluency gap roughly twice the size of the status and solidarity gaps. Six LLM judges reproduced the direction of this bias, and five reproduced its ordering across dimensions. The models diverged from humans in two ways: all understated the solidarity gap, the most socially grounded dimension, and all differentiated among learner L1 backgrounds where humans did not. LLM judges thus reproduce native speakers' language attitudes in a structured yet attenuated form, and the language attitudes framework offers a ready-made yardstick for auditing them beyond English.

Language model benchmarking is a difficult task. Outcome reasoning alone does not test the model's conceptualization of language and popular open-source benchmarks are quickly saturated or ingested as training data. It is important to test the model's output, but augmenting these tests by characterizing semantic structure gives more insight to how models relate abstract concepts. However, the high dimensional embedding spaces are not easy to interpret. This work demonstrates how topological methods can be used to rigorously compare these spaces to low dimensional and interpretable baselines like ontologies and curated knowledge graphs. These multi-modal alignment tests make it possible to track model adaptations and test phrase understanding across multiple languages.

Understanding sentiment in low-resource languages remains a key challenge for Natural Language Processing (NLP), particularly when domain-specific data is scarce. In this work, we present SentiBanglaBERT, a two-stage Bengali sentiment classification framework combining domain-adaptive continual pretraining and parameter-efficient fine-tuning. The approach enables contextual adaptation to news-style data while remaining computationally efficient through Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). Beyond performance, SentiBanglaBERT integrates SHAP-based interpretability, offering linguistic insights into how Bengali morphological cues, such as negation suffixes and aspectual markers, influence sentiment predictions. Experiments demonstrate stable performance comparable to strong baselines while providing greater transparency and interpretive depth. This framework highlights the potential of domain-adaptive continual learning as a foundation for interpretable, resource-efficient NLP in morphologically rich, underrepresented languages.

We evaluate large language models (LLMs) as language agents playing goal-directed dialogue games in self-play across 30 languages: the 24 official EU languages plus six others. Unlike static or preference-based evaluation, this paradigm is multi-turn, reference-free and programmatically scored, and because the game mechanics are language-agnostic it extends to a new language by localising a fixed set of prompt and word-list files. Evaluating nine open-weight and commercial LLMs, we find that no open-weight model covers the EU-24 well: in every official language both commercial systems outscore every open-weight model, and the two weakest average below 40 points across the EU-24. The commercial systems stay ahead even in languages with four orders of magnitude less public web text, showing that linguistic parity is achievable, but not from public crawls alone. A model's home region lifts it without closing the gap: Chinese is the strongest of all 30 languages for two Chinese-developed models, yet the best Chinese score of any model belongs to a US commercial system. Coverage is also not parity of service. Pooled over models and languages, the median non-English language costs 31% more to run than English, and scores 10% lower.

We introduce PlainMedScale, a topic-aligned medical corpus spanning four levels of comprehensibility in German and English, drawn from MSD (professional and consumer), Gesund.Bund, Apotheken Umschau Einfache Sprache, and the NHS. The four tiers correspond to distinct communicative functions --- reference, explanation, decision support, and access --- and move beyond the binary expert--lay contrast of prior corpora. In two pilot studies enabled by the alignments, we show that many readability metrics established on two registers fail to generalize across the full gradient, and that a SOTA open-weight LLM prompted for Plain Language still partially preserves the difficulty of its input. Code (https://github.com/GS-Uni-Heidelberg/PlainMedScale) and data (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21728290) are made available.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly expected to solve structured perception tasks that require visual recognition, language-to-object binding, object cardinality preservation, and precisely localized grounding and segmentation outputs. However, existing group-relative reinforcement learning methods provide only response-level supervision, creating a granularity mismatch for structured multi-object prediction: a single advantage is broadcast to all tokens in a response, without distinguishing individual box contributions. To address this mismatch, we propose MCR-GRPO, a marginal contribution assignment framework that derives box-level credit directly from each sampled response. Specifically, Marginal Contribution Reward (MCR) estimates each predicted box's contribution through a leave-one-out comparison, measuring how the matched set value changes when the box is removed from the response. After within-response normalization, records that improve the set value receive positive credit, while redundant or harmful ones are suppressed. To make marginal attribution stable and informative, we further introduce a Continuous Matched Set Value Evaluator that integrates permutation-invariant matching, count-aware normalization, and graded localization. MCR-GRPO maps normalized box-level marginal advantages to the token spans that generated each box, preserving GRPO's response-level comparison while enabling box-aware optimization of structured multi-object grounding. Experiments across REC, DOD, segmentation, and counting benchmarks show state-of-the-art performance over prior GRPO-based baselines.

Whether idiosyncratic, item-specific knowledge is learned before abstract class-level generalizations, or vice versa, is a central question in language learning, with exemplar and abstraction-based theories making opposite predictions. Recent methods have claimed to show that, at least for large language models, abstract knowledge is learned first. We show that these methods fall short: pure memorizer models with no abstract representations can appear, by the same criteria, to learn either item-specific or class-level knowledge first, depending on their sensitivity to individual observations, with the transition point governed by the distributional properties of the input. We further argue that the distinction between item-specific and abstract knowledge may be ill-defined for distributed representations, as a word's class-level properties may not be separable from its item-specific properties.

Large Language Models have achieved substantial progress in reasoning capabilities. Yet in low-resource native settings, many suffer from cross-lingual collapse, reverting to English during intermediate steps that require complex logical reasoning. This presents a cold-start bottleneck for policy optimization, whereas standard fine-tuning risks catastrophic forgetting due to cross-lingual representation drift. To address these challenges, we introduce the Onramp-Sequence Cross-Distillation (OSCD), a post-training algorithm that projects high-resource reasoning trajectories into low-resource vocabulary subspaces during generative training rollouts via an integrated translator agentic loop, ensuring the stable and efficient translation of dynamically generated reference samples for fine-tuning. This is coupled with joint-embedding semantic alignment of both reference and target-language reasoning traces, thereby bridging the pairwise cross-lingual representational gaps. Comprehensive evaluations using the AIME25 and HMMT25 benchmarks demonstrate that OSCD yields up to 3.2 times overall improvements in native Southeast Asian languages for mathematical reasoning, of which the joint-embedding semantic alignment component contributes up to 6.4% improvements in linguistic debiasing over translation-only baselines.

The linguistic notion of state has traditionally been restricted to the construct (annexation) state of Afroasiatic languages and treated as a language-specific morphosyntactic phenomenon. This article argues instead that the state is a systemic, context-dependent morphosyntactic mechanism that selects grammatical templates across synthetic languages. Within the Template-Based Modular Cognitive framework, taking Riffian as its primary empirical basis, the proposed theory provides a unified explanation for diverse nominal marking patterns traditionally analysed independently and is formalised as a symbolic computational model in which the state is represented by a set-valued function over grammatical templates. A learning algorithm based on finite-set operations acquires and predicts state-dependent grammatical configurations. Beyond nominal morphology, the framework has broader implications for theories of nominal structure and lexical cognition, in particular offering a unified analysis of determiner-noun structure. These results suggest that the state constitutes one instance of a broader class of syntactically conditioned dependencies that also includes agreement and grammatical case.

Cross-lingual transfer is central to low-resource machine translation, but its behavior within closely related language families remains insufficiently characterized. We study transfer among five Turkic languages; Turkish, Azerbaijani, Uzbek, Kazakh, and Kyrgyz; using pairwise transfer matrices. In this setting, each model is fine-tuned with one transfer source and evaluated on a different transfer target while the translation target remains the same. Across mT5 experiments, we find that transfer is strongest between closely related Turkic pairs, especially Turkish-Azerbaijani and Kazakh-Kyrgyz. We also show that transfer direction matters, and that the same transfer source-transfer target pair can behave differently when the translation target changes. Latinization improves BLEU and chrF in several script-mismatched settings, but its effect is not uniform across metrics. Additional analyses show that transfer sources are mostly stable across different datasets and model settings.

Multi-domain machine translation (MDMT) poses a unique challenge due to varying levels of linguistic complexity across domains. Inspired by human translators' ability to adapt reasoning effort based on difficulty, we propose TwT (Translation with Thought), a resource-rational framework that learns to modulate inference between intuitive and deliberate reasoning. TwT is trained in two stages: (1) supervised fine-tuning on difficulty-aware long chain-of-thought traces distilled from DeepSeek-R1 and rewritten by GPT-4o to reflect human-like reasoning economy, and (2) reinforcement learning with a hybrid reward to optimize translation quality and reasoning efficiency. Evaluated on 15 benchmarks spanning in-domain and out-of-domain settings, as well as 3 seen and 59 unseen languages, with ablations across three backbone models, TwT-7B and TwT-14B outperform much larger SOTA reasoning models in translation quality, while reducing token usage by 32--60%. These results confirm that aligning translation behavior with cognitive principles enables robust generalization, high translation quality, and efficient reasoning in MDMT.

Full-duplex spoken dialogue systems (FDSDSs) can listen while speaking, enabling natural behaviors such as smooth turn-taking, backchannel handling, and user barge-in handling. However, fair comparisons in multi-turn conversations remain a challenge. In addition, existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of languages and dialogue domains. We propose M3-DuplexBench, a multi-turn, multilingual, multidomain benchmark for FDSDSs. M3-DuplexBench supports English and Japanese and covers both casual conversation and multi-turn question answering. In addition, we evaluate models under multiple dialogue context settings, including single-turn, user-only, and teacher-forced full-context settings, to analyze how dialogue history affects model behavior. Experiments with recent FDSDSs reveal model-specific turn-taking characteristics, clear performance gaps across languages and domains, and mixed effects of dialogue context.

Dungan, a Sinitic language of Central Asia written in a Cyrillic-based script, is described in detail in the grammatical literature, yet the quantitative properties of its morphology in actual usage have, to the best of our knowledge, never been measured systematically. This paper uses a finite-state morphological analyzer as a measuring instrument. Implemented with HFST and covering both dialect groups (the Gansu variety, which is the literary standard, and the Shaanxi variety), the model offers no new grammatical description; it formalises the knowledge accumulated in Dungan studies and makes it measurable on corpora of three genres. Three results follow. Overt inflection is rare and limited: only 9.3% of recognized tokens in the encyclopaedic register have an overt marker, the system has just ten categories, and degree marking is almost absent. Ambiguity is genuine but sharply localized: 78.1% of tokens receive a single analysis, and the residue sits almost entirely on two clitics, -di (genitive/progressive) and -ni (locative/prospective). And the grammatical core proves effectively closed, the claim the instrument is really needed for: between 78% and 95% of the tokens the analyzer fails on, depending on register, are simply absent from the lexicon, and the phenomena the model deliberately declines to implement account for at most 4.5% of those failures. Held-out coverage (80 to 85%) is no lower than development coverage (73%), while a stem list with no morphology already reaches 67.4%, so the morphology is worth 5.2 points. The open frontier of Dungan is lexical. The analyzer, its sources and every evaluation script are released openly.

The rapid growth of large language models (LLMs) has resurrected age-old questions in sociolinguistics and world Englishes, such as who decides what counts as legitimate English, whose English is suspect etc. This paper examines how AI systems, their uses and discourse on them reflect, reinforce, and occasionally challenge (standard) language ideologies, which privilege Inner Circle norms and marginalize non-dominant Englishes. Drawing on evidence from empirical studies, media commentary, social media debates, and examples from AI outputs, the paper shows that AI technologies reproduce dominant language ideologies at different levels: training data, design protocols, evaluation benchmarks, user feedback and public commentary. The analysis uses the public controversy over AI-sounding language, especially the fixation on the word delve, to illustrate how speakers of English from the Global North police the English language norms of Global South English users. The paper also identifies what Christian Mair has called a "standardisation paradox": AI may homogenize English by privileging standard forms and at the same time pluralize Englishes through exposure to wide-ranging corpora and annotation work carried out by Global South users. In doing so, the paper argues that generative AI is reigniting long-standing debates in World Englishes about standardization, legitimacy, and the ownership of English, now playing out in algorithmic systems, model training, evaluation practices, and public discourse, where non-dominant Englishes are increasingly conflated with AI-generated speech. Discussing AI systems as a site where language ideologies are (re)produced, the paper argues for more inclusive design approaches that recognize the plurality of Englishes in order to address the real-world negative consequences of treating some as more legitimate than others.

Contemporary AI discourse attributes to language models properties they cannot bear: general intelligence as substrate-independent cognition, hallucination as cognitive failure, agency as autonomous goal-pursuit, sentience as emergent inner life, alignment as goal synchronization. This paper argues that these are instances of a single category mistake--properties constituted within human communicative practice are projected onto the machine side--and explains its structure. Human-LLM interaction constitutes a language game in which one side bears all normative activity. We call this configuration asymmetric communication since model outputs circulate communicatively, entering further exchanges, without the system undertaking commitments, bearing entitlements, or performing the assessment on which discursive standing depends. Three conditions define the asymmetry: (i) correctness is enforced exclusively by the receiver; (ii) accountability is borne by human participants alone; and (iii) the practical standing of any output depends entirely on human uptake. These conditions are structural, hold independently of capability, and remain unchanged as more powerful models raise the stakes of misattribution. The framework draws on Wittgenstein (meaning enacted in shared practices), Luhmann (communication completed on the receiver's side), Esposito (algorithmic contingency sufficient for uptake), and Brandom (normative scorekeeping as the source of discursive standing). Applied to all five, it reclassifies each as a receiver-side phenomenon, grounds guardrails as structural necessities rather than manifestations of machine moral agency, and yields an implication for AI governance. Alignment is institutional constraint engineering, not goal synchronization between agents, while responsibility remains with human institutions.

In this paper, we draw a comparison between linguists in training, a trained linguist, and annotations generated by large language models (LLMs) to find out if they struggle with complex linguistic phenomena in a similar way. For this purpose, we analyse evaluative language in spoken popular science discourse, with the example of a corpus of English TED talk transcripts. We focus on the Appraisal theory and its Attitude subsystem, including the categories (classes) of Affect, Judgement, and Appreciation. In this context, Appraisal theory is an example of a highly subjective annotation task, making it a suitable example for the study of complex annotation challenges. First, we assess human annotations on a sentence level in specific scientific domains. Then, we develop three prompts and compare them for model performance for the automatic classification of Appraisal classes. We assess the performance of three LLMs using the best-performing prompt and finetune the model, reaching an F1-score of 0.77. We find that models perform best compared to annotations conducted by the trained linguist, while linguists in training do not reach high agreement scores. We conclude that LLMs can aid in complex annotation task resolution, opening new pathways for the complex theories annotated and analyzed in digital humanities studies.

Modern face reenactment systems achieve impressive pose and expression transfer using geometry-driven representations. However, they largely ignore tongue dynamics, leading to anatomically inconsistent mouth interiors during speech and expressive motions. We introduce the first framework for cross-identity tongue dynamics transfer in face reenactment. We propose a foundation-model-assisted bootstrapping pipeline that produces a dedicated tongue segmentation model for in-the-wild reenactment without curated annotations. We further introduce a spatially constrained latent masked diffusion model for realistic tongue synthesis, with adaptive mask dilation for seamless mouth boundary transitions. Extensive experiments demonstrate improvements of more than two times over all baselines on every tongue-specific metric. We additionally propose a VLM-based evaluation protocol that replicates expert annotation at scale, confirming perceptual superiority across all ablation variants.

As large vision-language models (LVLMs) are deployed globally, the combination of multilingual instructions and visual information makes malicious attacks more covert and sophisticated than ever before. However, existing methods isolate language and modality defenses, which, coupled with the scarcity of safety data and high fine-tuning costs, makes it difficult for models to defend against compound attacks. To address this severe challenge, we propose a neuron-level cross-dimensional safety alignment framework driven by modality- and language-shared safety neurons (MLS-Neurons). First, we identify monolingual and unimodal safety neurons by comparing responses to harmful and benign samples, quantifying functional saliency through activation strength and downstream impact. Then, by intersecting these unimodal neurons within each language, we extract modality-shared safety neurons (MS-Neurons) responsive to both visual and textual risks, bridging the safety representation gap between modalities. Furthermore, using English as a semantic anchor, we intersect MS-Neurons across languages to identify modality- and language-shared safety neurons (MLS-Neurons), serving as key defenses against compound attacks. Finally, we update only this minimal subset of shared neurons (~0.03% of parameters), transferring English-only safety supervision to multilingual and multimodal scenarios. Extensive experiments show that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches across diverse multilingual and multimodal safety benchmarks while preserving general utility.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led sign language translation (SLT), the task of converting sign-language videos into spoken-language text, to increasingly adopt LLMs as textual backbones. However, despite their strong language modeling capabilities, existing LLM-based SLT methods often undermine rather than exploit this language prior, producing disfluent translations, a failure we term language-prior degradation. Meanwhile, existing methods typically align videos and text at the sentence level, which does not ensure accurate lexical details and creates a lexical fidelity gap. To address both issues, we propose DualAnchor, a gloss-free LLM-based SLT training framework that couples two complementary anchors for linguistically fluent and visually faithful generation. Token-level Prior Anchoring (TPA) preserves the LLM's language prior by regularizing the multimodal decoder at each decoding step toward the next-token distribution of a frozen LLM conditioned on the same autoregressive prefix. Optimal Transport Alignment (OTA) improves lexical fidelity by formulating visual-textual matching as entropy-regularized partial optimal transport, with Sinkhorn optimization inducing a soft alignment between visual tokens and textual content tokens under a cosine cost. DualAnchor achieves strong overall performance on both PHOENIX-2014T and CSL-Daily. Targeted analyses attribute these gains to the complementary effects of the two anchors: TPA improves fluency, whereas OTA reduces fine-grained lexical errors.

Large language models (LLMs) are often compared with the human mind because their decision-making is complex, non-linear and difficult to interpret. Psychological methods developed to investigate unobservable mental processes may therefore help examine LLM behaviour, particularly in government and healthcare. Building on prompt-based adaptations of the Implicit Association Test, this study tested whether ChatGPT produced sentiment differences across racial conditions in open-ended text. Fourteen base questions were crossed with eight racial categories and a race-agnostic control, producing 126 prompts. Each was submitted once to GPT-3.5T, GPT-4 and GPT-4T, yielding 378 responses. Sentiment scores were derived from categorical labels and source scores: positive labels retained the source score, negative labels were assigned its negative, and neutral responses were coded zero. A two-way ANOVA found a small main effect of racial condition, F(8, 351) = 2.04, p = .042, partial-eta squared = .044, but no effect of model, F(2, 351) = 0.07, p = .933, and no interaction, F(16, 351) = 0.23, p = .999. However, the effect was not retained in a rank-transformed sensitivity analysis, F(8, 351) = 1.53, p = .145, and Tukey-corrected comparisons found no significant pairwise differences. An uncorrected European-Indigenous Australian comparison was significant, but was selected post hoc and is reported only as hypothesis-generating. Evidence for sentiment differences was therefore weak and analysis-dependent. Sentiment scoring also cannot distinguish evaluative bias from the valence of historical content elicited by a prompt. We outline design changes needed to address these limitations and argue for interdisciplinary development of behavioural measures of model bias. Keywords: Implicit Bias, Psychological Research Methods, Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Large Language Models, Sentiment Analysis

State-of-the-art retrieval models increasingly rely on closed training data, creating a reproducibility gap. We present an open end-to-end recipe for training retrieval models and study how English supervision transfers to multilingual retrieval through translate-train. We first reconstruct and curate 665M English contrastive pre-training pairs from 1.4B pairs across 34 public sources and build 1.88M supervised fine-tuning pairs with mined hard negatives. Training yields two 149M-parameter models: DenseOn, a single-vector dense model, and LateOn, a ColBERT-style late-interaction model. They achieve 56.20 and 57.22 average nDCG@10 on BEIR, respectively, setting new state-of-the-art results for this size class. We then translate the validated English data into eight languages, yielding 2.8B pairs with cross-lingual samples, and train mDenseOn and mLateOn, two 307M-parameter models built on mmBERT-base. Despite sharing their backbone, data, and objectives, their representations behave differently: the dense model is strong on English and translated languages but degrades outside translate-train support, whereas the late-interaction model generalizes better to unseen languages and scripts. This suggests that token-level matching turns translate-train from a target-language expansion strategy into a multilingual generalization recipe. We publicly release the models, datasets, and training code.

Writing and communication are increasingly mediated by large language models (LLMs) that are being used to draft, revise and polish text. Although such assistance can improve clarity and help authors meet institutional expectations, widespread reliance on shared models may reduce population-level variation in linguistic form, a phenomenon we refer to as linguistic monoculture. We develop a mathematical framework in which authors and LLMs are represented as distributions over linguistic features and coevolve through repeated interaction. We analyze three interaction mechanisms: a shared model with a fixed linguistic distribution, a shared model recursively updated from author outputs, and personalized models updated through author-specific and population-level feedback. We characterize the resulting equilibria and convergence rates, showing that, shared models can drive authors toward a common norm, recursive feedback relocates the shared norm without altering pairwise spread under common conformity, and personalization can preserve a family of distinct author-model equilibria with nonzero linguistic diversity. We then endogenize conformity as a strategic choice trading off private benefits from clarity, legibility, and perceived fluency against distinctive style. Within this utility model, individually rational authors may conform more than is socially optimal because they do not internalize the value their distinctiveness provides to others, creating a negative externality and a price of monoculture that is finite for each fixed instance but can grow without bound when distinctiveness dominates authenticity. Synthetic simulations illustrate how fixed shared assistance, recursive feedback, and personalization produce different long-run diversity outcomes.

Regional bias in large language models (LLMs) may shape both perceptions of regional groups and decisions about individuals from different regions. Yet existing studies often examine these manifestations separately, leaving their structure and consequences unclear. We introduce Stereotypes-to-Decisions (S2D), a systematic framework evaluating regional bias from abstract stereotypes to concrete social decisions. Covering all 34 provincial-level administrative regions of China, S2D evaluates six LLMs using stereotype ratings of Warmth (perceived friendliness and trustworthiness) and Competence (perceived capability and intelligence), along with paired-choice tasks across Education, Occupation, and Social Interaction. Results reveal substantial regional differences in regional scores, with considerable agreement across models, especially for Competence and Occupation decisions. Furthermore, these patterns are associated with regional economic and digital development indicators and display mixed human-like stereotypes, with some regions rated highly on one dimension but poorly on the other. They also remain largely stable across Chinese and English prompts. Overall, our findings show that regional bias in LLMs is prevalent, systematic, and consequential, motivating more regionally aware evaluation and mitigation.

Despite the existence of exponentially many valid tokenizations for a given string, language models operate on a single canonical sequence deterministically produced by the tokenizer, leaving the broader tokenization space largely uncharacterized. In this paper, we investigate this overlooked space by studying the behavior of language models under non-canonical tokenizations across diverse languages. For English, prior work shows that models are largely invariant to alternative tokenizations that represent the same underlying string. We ask whether this invariance generalizes to other languages beyond English. We conduct a multilingual study across 27 languages spanning diverse scripts and evaluate LLM behavior under alternative tokenizations across six downstream tasks. We find that tokenization invariance does not generalize: model behavior varies substantially across languages with instruction-tuned models exhibiting an average relative performance drop of 23.7% for Llama-3.1-8B, 11.4% for Qwen3-8B, and 9.9% for Gemma-3-12B. The variation of tokenization invariance is systematic across languages. Languages that exhibit higher token fragmentation show significantly greater sensitivity to non-canonical tokenizations. Our study of tokenization robustness serves as a diagnostic of how tightly a model is coupled to its tokenizer. These results demonstrate that tokenization robustness is not a universal property of language models, but depends strongly on the language and its interaction with the tokenizer. We also show that LoRA fine-tuning with multi-tokenization training data provides an effective mitigation for tokenization sensitivity. Fine-tuning on English alone improves tokenization robustness across languages, while systematically sampling diverse non-canonical tokenizations achieves the strongest overall performance.

Training-free fusion of heterogeneous multimodal large language models (MLLMs) provides a direct route for cross-scale capability transfer, yet improvements in aggregate performance do not reveal what a smaller model actually inherits. Existing studies are largely designed and evaluated on limited task sets or aggregate metrics; as evaluation expands to broader task collections, whether different capabilities can transfer across scales remains poorly understood. To investigate this question, we introduce Cross-Scale Directional Parameter Injection (CDPI), a simple linear probe to analyze cross-scale knowledge transfer during heterogeneous fusion. A local theoretical analysis indicates that knowledge transfer selectivity is determined at first order by capability-dependent responses to a shared injection direction, while second-order curvature effects constrain the effective transfer regime. Across four Qwen3-VL model pairs and twelve multimodal benchmarks, our experiments reveal a consistent pattern of selectivity: gains concentrate on reasoning, particularly high-level reasoning, whereas perception performance remains close to that of the original target model. Component-wise ablations further show that high-level reasoning gains arise primarily from the language model, while ratio analysis finds that positive selective transfer occurs mainly in the small-ratio regime. These findings recast cross-scale heterogeneous MLLM fusion as selective language-side reasoning transfer within a narrow, low-interference regime, rather than broad capability inheritance.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday life and widely used for information seeking, raising concerns about their potential to perpetuate social biases and reinforce stereotypes. In this study, we investigate gender bias in LLMs through the lens of their associations with musical instruments. Building on social-science research on the cultural gender-typing of instruments, we introduce Symphony-Bias, a parallel multimodal dataset spanning text, vision, and audio. We evaluate ten multimodal models with diverse architectures and scales across 22 musical instruments, analyzing how they associate each instrument with three gender categories: {male, female, non-binary}, across three modalities: {text, vision, audio}. Our results show that 92% of instrument-level outcomes align with prior social-science findings, with the harp and drums showing particularly consistent gendered associations across all evaluated models and modalities. We further find that alignment with social stereotypes is weakest in audio, stronger in vision, and strongest in text, suggesting that modality-specific representations can differentially amplify gendered associations with musical instruments.\footnote{The Symphony-Bias dataset will be publicly released upon acceptance of the paper.}

Quattrociocchi and colleagues warn that the fluent outputs of large language models may allow linguistic plausibility to substitute for epistemic evaluation, producing the condition they call Epistemia: the experience of possessing knowledge without undertaking the practices through which judgment would ordinarily be warranted. This article accepts that diagnosis but challenges its explanatory framework, which compares an embodied, socially situated human knower with an isolated generative model thereby locating epistemic legitimacy in capacities internal to autonomous agents. Drawing on Carlo Sini's philosophy of practices, writing, signs, and technics, we propose instead to understand a large language model (LLM) as a techno-semiotic machine that automates a phase of written semiosis by producing plausible linguistic configurations from the sedimented archive of human writing. From this perspective, Epistemia is one consequence of a broader phenomenon that we call epistemic schizologia: the socio-technical cleavage between signs as linguistically accomplished expressions and signs as moments within socially embedded circuits of interpretation, evidence, criticism, verification, and responsibility. This cleavage is reinforced by eikotic closure, through which a plausible continuation is presented with the finality of an epistemic result, and by algorithmic authority and epistemic self-misrecognition. The relevant unit is therefore not the model alone but the complete practice in which generated inscriptions are prompted, interpreted, verified, contested, used, and made consequential. This reframing preserves the distinction between linguistic production and responsible understanding while grounding a design programme centred on inspectable genealogy, contestability, distributed responsibility, epistemic agency, and the evaluation of hybrid human--AIpractices.

Code-mixed speech poses unique challenges to forced alignment: expanded inventories, orthographic errors, and speaker variation. We evaluate forced alignment of Hindi-English code-mixed speech using the Montreal Forced Aligner. We address 2 problems: (1) free variation involving native vs non-native pairs and (2) phonemic boundary detection for mid-utterance English words. Bootstrapping strategies substantially outperform unmodified lexicons. Acoustic models trained on sentence-level code-mixed data achieve a mean error of 4.15ms, ie. ten times lower than monolingual Hindi (38.18ms) or isolated English (37.58ms) alternatives. Principled lexicon design and code-mixed training data are both essential for reliable alignment of bilingual speech.

Prompt compression shortens LLM input to reduce inference cost, yet existing methods score token importance through LM forward passes. It remains questionable whether such nuanced, costly token selection is necessary. Compression requires identifying informative content, a problem that linguistic research has long addressed through cues that can be operationalized as deterministic rules. We therefore ask: can \textbf{linguistic rules alone} serve as effective prompt compressors, without LM-based scoring at compression time? To address this, we conduct offline evolutionary search over lexical, syntactic, semantic, and discourse seeds to find competitive rule combinations. The resulting linguistic compressor requires no LM forward pass at deployment and uses only CPU-side processing for compression. We evaluate it with a dual-path protocol to balance compression quality and reconstruction fidelity. Across short passages, multi-document reasoning, and dialogue-memory QA datasets, evolved compressors achieve performance similar to that of recent advanced prompt-compression strategies. Performance is strongest under light-to-moderate compression and degrades as compression becomes more aggressive, while the Direct and Reconstruction paths exhibit distinct patterns. Evolutionary analysis reveals that effective compression fuses signals across linguistic levels and, as the compression ratio increases, rules shift from token pruning to sentence extraction.

Macroareas are geographical areas used in typological research for grouping variables of interest. In linguistic typology, languages in a given macroarea are considered to have potential for contact, in contrast to those outside the area, where contact is less likely. Along with language family membership, macroareas are used as controls for models in linguistic typology, in an attempt to address the problem of autocorrelation - the observation that historical developments or typological patterns may be due to contact between neighboring languages and/or inheritance from a common ancestral language. Macroareas are therefore a central aspect of research that seeks to separate universal properties of language from local (or language-specific) properties. Existing macroareas largely depend on expert determinations of what constitutes a geographical area of potential contact, and to date have mainly aligned with continents or landmasses (Hammarström and Donohue 2014; Nichols, Witzlack-Makarevich, and Bickel 2013). While there are various historical and theoretical reasons for these groupings, there as of yet has been no systematic approach to identifying such areas for a given region. This paper attempts to address such a gap and move beyond macroarea to identification of language areas of relatively arbitrary size, presenting a simple geographical clustering method for identifying groupings over any area. The method produces a set of worldwide macroareas that largely align with existing groupings, as well as local groupings for a well-known sprachbund.

Conversational entrainment is well-studied in monolingual and written contexts, but remains underexplored in spoken code-switching (CSW). We present a novel cross-lingual analysis of entrainment in Mandarin-English, Hindi-English, and Spanish-English dialogue and show that, while lexical entrainment generalizes across language pairs, entrainment over acoustic-prosodic and CSW style aspects exhibits context-specific variation. We build on these findings by asking whether classification models capture these human behavioral patterns. Applying feature importance and ablation analyses, we find that classical and Transformer-based classifiers detect entrainment reasonably well but consistently prioritize features other than those most salient to human entraining behavior. Our approach introduces a human-grounded framework for evaluating model decision-making in multilingual stylistic contexts, and suggests future challenges for developing conversational agents capable of producing naturalistic code-switched speech.

The challenge of Machine Translation for low resource languages such as Tamil is primarily caused by the restricted amount of parallel data for these languages, as well as their substantial amount of domain variation and morphological complexity. This research presents the comprehensive evaluation of the performance of several multilingual translation models on English-Tamil and Tamil-English translations across multiple datasets: NTREX, EnTamV2, WikiMatrix and PMIndia. This study evaluates supervised NMT systems, NLLB and mBART, using both the BLEU and chrF metric, and examines how these systems perform on data of different quality levels and domains. This performs an attention-based analysis to increase model interpretability by visualising the alignments of tokens in an English source text and their Tamil translations and vice-versa to provide insight into how they make translations. This study also demonstrates that using in-context prompting can provide an excellent way to perform a few-shot translation of English to Tamil and Tamil-English using a Tamil capable TamilLaMA model, and compare this to supervised approaches qualitatively. These findings show that the quality of the datasets and their alignment with the domain will greatly affect the performance of the model, that attention-based mechanisms can aid in explain ability, and that few-shot large language models can still produce structurally coherent translations of Tamil.

Large language models may easily assign personality labels from text, but model interpretability remains an open problem. To address this gap, we introduce LEX-EC, a reusable black-box audit framework combining prevalence and agreement diagnostics with controlled lexical ablation to distinguish marginal-distribution effects from trait-associated signal recoverable under restricted evidence. Using this framework, we illustrate how various text genres may exhibit sharply different profiles: free-form essay text contains the broadest, but still weak, signal; in graduate student introductions, an observable Extraversion association weakened after masking; and single Facebook statuses yield little stable evidence even in a trait-balanced sample, indicating a possible lower bound of content or length. Masking topical and demographic content weakened some associations while leaving others detectable from function words, affective terms, and cognitive-style vocabulary. Linguistic prompting shifted model self-explanations but did not eliminate topical content. LEX-EC jointly evaluates classification prevalence, item-level association, chance-corrected agreement, persistence under lexical restriction, and prompt sensitivity in model-generated explanations. Across datasets, models, and prompts, LEX-EC characterizes how trait associations may vary with available lexical evidence, introducing a novel application of lexical methods to black-box interpretability in personality labeling.

Large language models (LLMs) process text through subword tokenizers rather than directly reading characters or words. Because these tokenizers are trained predominantly on English-centric corpora, they introduce a systematic and often overlooked disadvantage for many non-English languages. In this work, we quantify this tokenizer tax for Indian languages using the FLORES-200 parallel corpus, measuring tokenization fertility across six widely used tokenizers and fourteen languages. Under cl100k_base (used by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4), Indian languages experience an average 8.0x tokenization tax relative to English, reaching 13.0x for Malayalam, reducing the effective context window to as little as 12% of that available to English users for equivalent semantic content. We identify the primary mechanism behind this disparity: failed byte-pair merges that leave text fragmented into single-byte tokens, with merge failure strongly correlating with tokenizer tax (Pearson r = 0.89). We further show that this phenomenon is not an inherent property of Indic scripts but a consequence of tokenizer design. Multilingual tokenizers such as XLM-R and OpenAI's o200k_base reduce the average Indic tokenizer tax by 73%, demonstrating that the disparity is largely remediable. Beyond token statistics, we quantify a practical consequence by showing that, under fixed context budgets, Indian-language documents preserve substantially less original content than equivalent English documents. Finally, we examine the relationship between tokenizer fertility and reading comprehension performance on the Belebele benchmark, finding that the apparent correlation is largely explained by language resource availability rather than tokenizer behavior alone.

Existing research on affect in speech has shown how acoustic surface characteristics and content-related linguistic aspects of speech both relate to perceived emotional arousal and valence. However, it is not clear what the relative contributions of these two factors are in the perceptual process. This is especially true for Finnish, for which most existing studies focus on either acoustic-phonetic or text analysis. This paper presents a study where we systematically explore the combinatory role of text- and audio-based features in modeling the human perception of valence and arousal using a newly released affective speech corpus for spontaneous Finnish. We show that the combination of text- and audio-based features improves valence regression results over the individual modalities, whereas for arousal regression the complementary effect is not substantial. The results support prior findings from other languages, providing new data and knowledge on spontaneous Finnish speech.

Massively multilingual automatic speech recognition (ASR) models covering hundreds of languages must maintain robust performance across diverse linguistic and acoustic conditions. However, these models often encounter the curse of multilinguality, where model capacity is diluted across languages. To address this challenge, we propose Mixture of Language Group Experts (MoLGE), built upon speech self-supervised models (S3Ms). MoLGE assigns dedicated expert modules to clusters of similar languages, reducing the number of required submodules compared to conventional language-specific Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) schemes. It further integrates a hierarchical Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) strategy into the disentangled acoustic and linguistic components of the S3M architecture, enabling efficient modeling of language-specific characteristics while maintaining parameter efficiency. Further, we investigate the impact of language grouping strategies based on both linguistic and data-driven criteria on overall performance, providing an interpretable perspective on how language structure influences scalability in multilingual speech systems. In experiments, we evaluate MoLGE on a multilingual benchmark encompassing 495 languages. Results demonstrate that MoLGE consistently outperforms dense multilingual baselines with a minimal increase in trainable parameters. Notably, these language grouping strategies yield substantial improvements for both phonetic and orthographic aspects of ASR modeling. Our findings suggest that structured language specialization provides an effective pathway for massively scaling language coverage of multilingual ASR.

Instruction hierarchy (IH) requires models to prioritize instructions by source, ensuring that higher-priority instructions override lower-priority ones. Despite its importance for safe and controllable deployment, existing evaluations have focused almost exclusively on English, leaving it unclear whether IH compliance remains stable in multilingual settings. We introduce XIH-Bench, a benchmark for multilingual IH evaluation with both same-language and cross-language conflicts across six languages, four domains, and three IH settings. Across models, we find two consistent patterns. First, IH compliance exhibits a clear language-dependent asymmetry: a language that strengthens compliance in the higher-priority position can become disruptive in the lower-priority position. Second, cross-language conflicts yield higher compliance than same-language conflicts, a phenomenon we term the Language Boundary Effect. We further show that language specialization can make lower-priority instructions in model-favored languages harder to override, creating multilingual reliability and security risks.

Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) are effective for images, video, and audio, yet deterministic JEPA-style latent prediction has not become a standard objective for text encoders. We argue that this gap reflects a mismatch between squared-error latent prediction and the conditional structure of language. The key requirement is conditional concentration: given a context and target location, the target representation should lie near a single meaningful point. Local image prediction often satisfies this through spatial continuity, whereas masked text can admit multiple valid token or span completions whose representations need not share a coherent center. We formalize this mismatch through three conditions---predictability, non-collapse, and low conditional variance---and show how their failure creates centroid degeneracy and collapse pressure in text. Matched I-JEPA and T-JEPA experiments reveal the predicted sequence: mutual-information saturation and elevated target variance precede train--validation instability, effective-rank degeneration, cosine collapse, and poor downstream transfer. The same pattern appears across five independent data seeds, indicating that it is not a sampling artifact. These results do not rule out predictive learning for language; they show that text-compatible JEPA objectives must preserve multiple plausible completions rather than compress them into a single latent point.

Offensive language detection models generally suffer performance degradation when deployed across datasets and across languages, yet most existing studies stop at reporting this phenomenon and lack a systematic methodology for decomposing the causes of degradation into attributable components and quantifying the cost of remediation. This paper proposes a diagnosis and optimization framework composed of three coordinated technical components. First, a zero-shot transfer loss decomposition that separates the performance degradation from OLID to MLMA into two independently measurable components, namely dataset effect and language effect. Second, a controlled fine-tuning protocol that quantifies both adaptation efficiency and the hidden damage inflicted on the source task by comparing few shot learning curves under continued fine-tuning and cold-start starting points. Third, three joint training strategies incorpo rating temperature sampling and experience replay, which offer a controllable Pareto trade-off between improving multilingual capability and preserving source-task performance. Experiments built on this framework show that the dataset effect dominates the zero-shot transfer loss and substantially outweighs the language effect. Few-shot adaptation without a replay mechanism, though data-efficient, inflicts source task damage 4 to 9 times greater than that of the joint training strategies, and its damage magnitude is highly unstable. The three joint training strategies trade 3.2 to 4.1 percentage points of source-task performance for 8.1 to 42.6 percentage points of multilingual capability gain, forming a clear and controllable Pareto trade-off.