Planner

Latent world models are judged by how well they predict, so when planning fails at long horizons the natural reading is that the predictor degrades. On a reproduction of LeWorldModel on TwoRoom we show the binding constraint is the planner's objective instead. The predictor is not the limit: its imagined state seventy-five environment steps ahead is still only 0.189 as wrong as assuming the world froze, while the planner never imagines beyond twenty-five. The objective is. Cross-entropy-method planning minimises squared latent distance, which tracks true distance at r = 0.426, saturates by about eighty arena units and decreases beyond a hundred and twenty, so moving away from the goal can lower the cost. The information is present throughout: a ridge probe recovers position from the frozen embedding at R^2 0.9922. The pathology is the method's, not one reimplementation's. It is present in the authors' released weights, and across four checkpoints long-horizon success rank-orders exactly with metric quality and inversely with prediction accuracy. Replacing only the objective, with nothing retrained and no GPU, lifts goals reached at offset 100 from 26.0% to 98.0%, equals the 98.0% at offset 25, and reaches 92.0% under a third of the budget: planning stops depending on the horizon. The best cost is not the most accurate. A head learned from frame separation alone predicts spatial distance worse than a position probe (r = 0.819 against 0.9897) yet plans better, charging 24% more to cross the environment's dividing wall where squared latent distance charges 4% less. It has learned reachability, not proximity.

The rapid growth of LLM inference is shifting sustainability concerns from one-time training to continuous serving, where infrastructure decisions shape energy use, carbon emissions, water consumption, and service quality. Yet operators often need to compare deployment alternatives before large-scale infrastructure is built, making direct measurement costly, slow, and sometimes infeasible. We present InFactPlanner, a trace-driven decision-support framework for what-if analysis of sustainable AI data center deployment for LLM inference across single and geo-distributed sites. InFactPlanner combines query traces, hardware-model profiles, candidate site configurations, PUE/WUE parameters, renewable generation models, and time-varying grid carbon intensity to estimate power, energy, carbon emissions, water use, latency, and server utilization. The framework abstracts low-level serving effects into configurable hardware-model profiles, enabling rapid comparison of site selection, capacity placement, hardware, model, renewable integration, and routing choices. We validate the energy accounting pipeline by reproducing reference LLM inference energy estimates with less than 10% deviation, evaluate scalability across multiple data centers and server counts, and demonstrate scenario-driven decision analyses for hardware selection, renewable placement, geographic deployment, and carbon-aware routing. Our results show that sustainability-optimal choices can differ from latency-optimal ones, and that the carbon value of deployment depends strongly on the local grid mix.

This paper presents a real-time Plan-and-Avoid (PAA framework for coordinating cooperative multi-agent airspace operations around a declared priority trajectory. The priority trajectory represents an aircraft flight plan that must be preserved because of constrained maneuverability, an emergency, a mission-critical task, or assigned operational priority. The framework predicts uncertainty-aware, well-clear separation violations with surrounding traffic and, when the priority plan alone cannot maintain separation, generates vehicle-constrained unilateral advisories that modify nearby aircraft trajectories to maintain well-clear separation for all traffic. The approach is applicable to any declared priority trajectory. This paper demonstrates the Plan component using a contingency landing planner to generate candidate priority trajectories. PAA then identifies nearby aircraft passing too close to this priority trajectory and issues Avoid resolution advisories to these aircraft. The framework is tested using real-world Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) traffic from the Washington, D.C., airspace across more than 900 forced-landing cases, totaling over 140 hours of simulated flight. The PAA framework generates feasible cooperative advisories for all 575 unique conflict encounters, with a worst-case end-to-end response time of 5.7 s on a personal computer, including priority trajectory planning, advisory generation, and 1 s two-way datalink delay. In total, 93.5% of generated advisories satisfy the 35 s RTCA DO-365 Detect-and-Avoid temporal threshold. These results demonstrate low-latency coordination for preserving priority trajectories while maintaining well-clear separation through real-time automated advisory generation. Future work will quantify advisory-induced delays and their operational impacts.

We present GASP, a GPU-Accelerated Safe Planner for real-time, collision-aware joint-space motion generation in known environments. GASP combines a clamped B-spline trajectory parameterization with a convolutional residual neural network that predicts the free interior control points, while analytically inserted boundary control points enforce initial and final derivative constraints for collision-aware planning under non-stationary conditions. A conditional variational autoencoder samples multiple trajectory candidates, which are decoded and validated in parallel on the GPU, yielding a batched planner for collision-aware coupled joint-space motion with near-millisecond inference. We validate GASP as an online motion-generation module, where it achieves analytical-level success rates with high collision-aware feasibility and substantially reduces inference time relative to GPU-based trajectory optimization. We further deploy GASP as a reinforcement-learning reset planner in competitive robotic table tennis, matching the baseline return rate while roughly halving training-time collisions.

Mainstream plan-then-track approaches to multifingered grasp execution entail selecting a grasp, planning a collision-free trajectory, and tracking the resulting trajectory via a feedback controller. Pose-estimation error during execution or scene motion can invalidate this open-loop commitment and trigger replanning. We thus present Grasp Distance Fields (GDFs), smooth softmin distances to finite sets of arm-hand grasp configurations. Using their negative gradients as feedback, we jointly select and execute grasps without planning a trajectory. A CBF-CLF quadratic program (QP) enforces self-collision, workspace, object, and obstacle-clearance constraints, while its CLF slack quantifies obstruction of task progress. We bound the softmin approximation error by $\log N/ρ$ and prove forward invariance of the filtered safe set. To handle changes in contact topology, we combine a hysteretic contact-mode transition with a wrench-quality CBF that limits degradation of the realized force-closure margin relative to hold onset. Using our method, a fixed-base manipulator and a Unitree G1 equipped with the same underactuated hand grasp and lift 46 of 50 test objects amid clutter and moving obstacles. The realized grasps also retain a median 94% of their synthesized quality margin, and each QP solve requires 0.09 ms within a 20 ms control interval. Project page: www.clintonenwerem.com/gdf.

Integrating heterogeneous industrial knowledge, including factual relations and decision constraints, remains a core challenge in industrial information systems. Machining process planning exemplifies this problem because engineers must select operations by combining material properties, feature characteristics, and quality requirements. Existing methods rely mainly on similarity retrieval or classification, without a unified ranking objective or standardized evaluation. We propose PCA-GAT, which formulates machining process plan recommendation as a knowledge graph enhanced collaborative filtering problem. Bayesian Personalized Ranking provides the learning objective, while Recall@K and NDCG@K define evaluation. The knowledge graph supplies semantic structure when collaborative signals are sparse. Four domain constraints, material compatibility, precision requirements, feature applicability, and operation sequencing, are introduced as attention biases during graph propagation. Type-specific weights learn their importance, and an adaptive gate adjusts their influence using local context. On a real aerospace dataset with 115 parts and 507 plans, PCA-GAT achieves Recall@1 = 0.9087 and strong cold-start robustness, with about half the degradation of the strongest baseline under severe sparsity. Ablation studies show that knowledge graph enrichment is essential, constraints add value, and ungated constraint injection can hurt performance. The learned weights identify material-operation compatibility as the dominant factor, consistent with domain expertise. Results on three public benchmarks show no degradation when constraints are absent, supporting generalization beyond manufacturing. This study establishes a standardized recommendation protocol for engineering process planning and benchmarks seven methods across three categories, showing that knowledge representation is the main bottleneck.

We present a unified trajectory planning and control framework for the satisfaction of Signal Temporal Logic (STL) specifications defined over convex predicates. At the planning layer, STL tasks are encoded as time-varying convex sets in configuration space, specifically designed so that forward invariance of the system with respect to these sets implies satisfaction of the specification with a prescribed robustness margin. This representation is then lifted to the joint time--configuration space and combined with the Graphs of Convex Sets (GCS) framework, yielding a shortest-path formulation of the planning problem over convex spatio-temporal sets. Trajectories are parameterized by B-splines, which enable continuous-time enforcement of STL satisfaction, collision avoidance, and smoothness constraints. At the control layer, the same time-varying sets used for planning are exploited to design a feedback controller that tracks the planned trajectory while prioritizing satisfaction of the STL specification during execution in the presence of tracking errors and model mismatch. We validate the proposed approach in simulation and in real-world experiments on space robotic platforms.

Current video generation models achieve impressive results in single-shot generation, yet remain limited in cinematic video generation, where coherent narratives and effective multi-shot composition require explicit shot planning. To address this challenge, we propose ShotPlan, a framework for explicit multi-shot cinematic video generation built upon a video diffusion foundation model. Our method introduces learnable planning tokens that capture shot-level transition cues and can be seamlessly integrated with the original video generation tokens to control transition timestamps. Unlike standard video generation tokens, the proposed planning tokens are equipped with Fractional Temporal Rotary Position Embedding (FRoPE), enabling shot transitions to be modeled at the frame level. Experiments demonstrate that ShotPlan significantly outperforms existing cinematic video generation methods, offering more flexible shot management and stronger inter-shot consistency.

Vision-Language Navigation in dynamic, human-centric environments exposes a fundamental tension: linguistic reasoning is slow and deliberative, whereas safe, socially compliant planning should be instant and reactive. The resulting observation staleness is safety-critical: a maneuver chosen during inference can already be unsafe by the time it executes. We observe that, long before a VLM finishes its inference, its intermediate hidden states already encode action-relevant intent. We propose SPARK-VLN, a dual-system framework for dynamic social VLN that streams the slow VLM reasoner's knowledge to a fast flow-matching expert planner throughout token generation, providing fresh and evolving guidance during inference. This design is realized by three modules: a Token-Wise Hidden Streamer that extracts intermediate hidden states along the token generation process, a Sequence-to-Slot Latent Bridge that projects them into fixed-size latent slots, and an Evolving Latent Conditioner that infuses them into the expert planner. We also introduce a human-centric benchmark suite for dynamic social vision-language navigation that keeps pedestrians and the robot active throughout inference and reports navigation success, social compliance, human collisions, and explicit staleness statistics. Across these settings, SPARK-VLN mproves navigation success and social compliance while sustaining inference efficiency. Webpage: https://hutslib.github.io/SPARK-VLN/.

The capability of a modern AI agent depends not only on its foundation model but also on its harness, which constructs prompts, manages state, invokes tools, and coordinates execution. As models, APIs, environments, and requirements evolve, the harness must be continually modified. Before such a change can be made, a developer or coding agent must identify all code locations that implement the target behavior. This is difficult because production harnesses are large, tightly coupled, and behaviorally distributed, while modification requests describe what the system should do and repositories are organized by files and modules. Code search, repository indexing, and long-context processing ease inspection, but still leave this behavior-to-code mapping to be recovered by hand. Behavior localization is therefore a central bottleneck in harness evolution. We introduce the Harness Handbook, a behavior-centric representation synthesized automatically from a harness codebase via static analysis and LLM-assisted structuring, linking each behavior to its corresponding source. We also introduce Behavior-Guided Progressive Disclosure (BGPD), which guides agents from high-level behaviors to relevant implementation details and verifies candidate locations against the current source. On diverse modification requests from two open-source harnesses, Handbook-Assisted planning improves behavior localization and edit-plan quality while using fewer planner tokens, with the largest gains on scattered sites, rarely executed paths, and cross-module interactions. Evolving complex agentic systems thus depends not only on generating edits, but also on determining where those edits should be made.

Latent world models are trained to predict future states in a learned representation and are then deployed inside a planner that selects actions by simulating them forward. Current practice adopts the prediction error, the single- or multi-step rollout loss on held-out data, as the training and model-selection objective, on the assumption that a lower prediction error yields better control. We show that this assumption is unreliable for a structural reason: a planner does not query the model on the training distribution but on the states that its candidate actions reach, which generally leave the data manifold, so an error averaged over the data cannot by itself govern control. We therefore reframe the objective as the discrepancy between the predicted and the true plan-cost at the plan the planner commits to, and prove that the planner's suboptimality is bounded by twice this discrepancy, whereas the data-averaged prediction error neither bounds nor tracks it. Under a linear-control premise the discrepancy separates into two terms. The first is a small on-manifold residual, on which the predicted and true dynamics agree and which a spectral tax prices through the non-normality of the latent transition operator. The second is an off-manifold divergence, on which an action carries the state off the manifold and the two dynamics diverge; this divergence is the binding term and is bounded by no data-averaged error. Synthetic operators confirm the pricing formulas, and latent model-predictive control experiments confirm the decoupling: across seeds, the single-step validation error is essentially uncorrelated with control success, whereas a fidelity score on the planner-reachable measure tracks it.

i-EXAM is a planning-powered tool that helps system administrators to create security profiles of complex networks and perform what-if analyses to identify network hardening strategies. It leverages planning compilation that provides soundness and completeness guarantees to identify attack paths, evaluate security metrics, generate diverse hardening strategies, and explain these strategies in natural language using Large Language Models.

Zero-shot Object Goal Navigation (ZSON) with RGB-only perception poses a fundamental challenge for embodied agents, as the absence of explicit depth information introduces severe physical uncertainty and semantic-physical misalignment. Existing approaches either rely on high-level semantic reasoning without geometric grounding or learn end-to-end policies that lack explicit physical constraints, often resulting in semantically plausible but physically unsafe behaviors. In this paper, we propose MVP-Nav, a physical-aware RGB-only navigation framework that aligns perception, planning, and control with the real 3D world. MVP-Nav reconstructs explicit physical occupancy from monocular observations by leveraging 3D foundation models to project 2D semantic instances into 3D oriented bounding boxes, forming a global spatial semantic representation. To unify high-level semantic reasoning and low-level physical constraints, we introduce a Multi-layer Value Map (MVM) that integrates semantic priorities and reconstructed geometry into a shared cost space, enabling physically grounded geometric planning. Extensive experiments on zero-shot object navigation benchmarks demonstrate that MVP-Nav significantly outperforms existing depth-free methods, achieving state-of-the-art performance and validating that structured physical priors can effectively compensate for the absence of active depth sensors.

Generative models have recently seen rapid adoption in End-to-End (E2E) autonomous driving (AD), with diffusion-based denoising and vocabulary-based retrieval becoming the dominant trajectory-decoding paradigms. Despite their architectural diversity, current generative AD planners share a common inference pattern: a fixed set of candidate trajectories (anchors, vocabulary entries, or proposal queries) is scored by one or more learned heads conditioned on the Bird's-Eye-View (BEV) features, and the highest-scored candidate is returned as the final trajectory. Under this design, the scoring head is the only barrier between perception and the motion command, and its decision margins between competing candidates are often small. We introduce \textsc{Derail}, an adversarial framework that exploits this scoring-head attack surface. Evaluated on various generative planners, \textsc{Derail} flips the trajectory selection from a safe to an unsafe candidate, with score drops of $39$--$80\%$ and collision rates of up to $50\%$, consistently outperforming generic loss-maximization and feature-divergence attacks. Our analysis suggests that safety-violating objectives govern attack effectiveness against generative AD planners, and that the scoring-head inference pattern itself is a recurring attack surface worth explicit defensive consideration.

Large language model (LLM) multi-agent systems increasingly depend not only on how individual agents reason, but also on how agents are connected. This paper introduces QueenBee Planner, a framework that treats inter-agent communication topology as a retrievable and self-improving design skill. A pool of worker agents, the task adapter, and the scoring function are frozen; only an outer LLM planner learns to generate temporal communication DAGs specifying who sends information to whom, in which round, who merges messages, and who emits the final answer. Execution traces are distilled into evidence-backed design rules with three actions: \emph{Preserve}, \emph{Modify}, and \emph{Avoid}. To prevent self-evolution from turning lucky runs or plausible but false explanations into policy, QueenBee uses held-out acceptance gates, variance-aware credit, motif-level attribution, transfer trust, insight falsification, and structural deduplication. We evaluate the method on Count-Frequency aggregation and Silo-Bench-style distributed coordination tasks. With fixed workers, self-evolved graph generation produces communication structures that improve over fixed topologies and cold generation. In the CF fulltest setting, the best generated graph reduces RMSE from 12.53 for the strongest fixed topology to 7.87 while also reducing messages, model calls, and token cost; Silo-style results show the same direction of improvement over cold and fixed-topology baselines. These results suggest that multi-agent systems can learn reusable architectural design knowledge rather than merely memorizing task answers.

Multi-hop question answering remains challenging for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) because existing approaches either propagate errors across iterative retrieval rounds or over-generate reasoning steps, increasing cost without improving accuracy. We propose Grounded Delta Planning RAG (GDP-RAG), a plan-based framework that targets only the information delta based on three simple design choices: (1) preliminary retrieval to ground planning before execution, (2) a gap-conditioned planning prompt that asks only for missing information, and (3) a skeletal trajectory that pairs each subquery with a Thought capturing evidence from preliminary retrieval and carrying it through to the final answer. GDP-RAG focuses computation on unresolved gaps, yielding concise, reliable reasoning trajectories. Extensive experiments on HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MuSiQue show that GDP-RAG achieves the highest accuracy (60.63%) among all compared systems while maintaining a cost-of-pass of 0.51, 22% lower than PAR-RAG (0.65) and 68% lower than KnowTrace (1.57), with no method achieving both higher accuracy and lower cost.

We present OmniV2X, a generative foundation model for vehicle-to-everything (V2X) cooperative driving. The model directly interprets independent context sequences comprising multi-modal and multi-agent observations. The new design mitigates the computational cost of dense 3D perception, the vulnerability to data scarcity in cooperative scenarios, and the poor compliance with standardized messaging in existing methods that fuse multi-modal inputs into a shared representation. For training, we present an end-to-end supervised pipeline using a downstream trajectory generation loss, in which a high-capacity generative sequence planner implicitly learns to steer the model and leverage multi-modal inputs via cross-attention injection. As a foundation model, we demonstrate that OmniV2X pre-trained on large-scale single-agent planning datasets can efficiently adapt to cooperative environments by integrating the conditioning context with lightweight, standard-compliant V2X tokens. Evaluated on the DAIR-V2X-Seq dataset, OmniV2X outperforms existing end-to-end cooperative driving baselines, achieving state-of-the-art performance with less than 10% of the fine-tune V2X dataset and less than 1% of the communication bandwidth. We conduct comprehensive evaluations to demonstrate its computational efficiency and robustness under real-world constraints.

Personalized public transit routing in public transit systems remains challenging due to the difficulty of capturing and integrating diverse user preferences into routing algorithms. This paper presents ChatPlanner, a novel framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to enable preference aware public transit routing. Our approach employs fine-tuned LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to extract routing parameters and interpret nuanced user preferences from natural language queries, subsequently integrating these preferences into the objective function of a public transit routing algorithm. This study designs preference aware datasets incorporating eight personas and five contexts to establish scoring standards for both fine-tuning and RAG. This work conducted three experiments to validate the solutions' feasibility, extraction of routing information and preferences, and solution set quality and completeness. Results demonstrate that ChatPlanner generates feasible solutions reliably. Fine-tuning enforces the required output structure and learns general preference patterns, while RAG provides query-specific context to resolve imprecise or conversational expressions and calibrate continuous scores. The combination of both achieves the highest accuracy in routing information extraction and user preference interpretation. Results based on selected case studies show that by capturing user preferences, ChatPlanner identifies valuable solutions across different dimensions that existing route planners overlook, generating more valuable route alternatives. This research establishes a new paradigm for integrating natural language understanding into transportation optimization.

Automated Planning is a subfield of Artificial Intelligence (AI) where the main objective is generating a sequence of actions, known as a plan, that helps us reach a goal state from an initial state. A planning problem is defined by a set of objects, an initial state and a desired goal state. The objective is to compute a plan that'll lead us from the inital state to the goal state. Programs that generate plans are called planners. In this paper, we did a complementary study to the state-of-the-art LLM called PlanGPT which was released last year. We redid some experiments to verify whether planning with LLMs is \textbf{pertinent} and \textbf{worthwhile}. We also check whether the results obtained in the official PlanGPT paper for plan coverage were correct, and we also performed a more comprehensive study on PlanGPT's performance: in our paper PlanGPT's performance was evaluated using two metrics: Plan Cost and Plan Generation Time. The results of planGPT were compared to those produced by a traditional planner for the same plans and same metrics. We discovered that PlanGPT is no better than a Greedy search strategy.

Flexible robotic automation requires systems that interpret operator intent, verify physical feasibility, and recover from execution failures across both the planning and execution stages. This paper proposes an agentic neuro-symbolic framework for human-in-the-loop industrial robotics, in which LLMs are used for tasks that require language understanding or contextual reasoning, while all verification, sequencing, and execution remain deterministic. The framework adapts the Planner-Generator-Evaluator (PGE) harness pattern from software engineering into a Specifier-Designer-Inspector (SDI) architecture for industrial robotics, combined with LangGraph-based dynamic routing for failure recovery. A two-tier recovery mechanism addresses structure-level replanning through context-aware orchestration and execution-level geometric failures through deterministic recovery skills. A Unity3D digital twin supports human inspection, modification, and re-verification prior to physical execution. Evaluated on natural-language commands across multiple difficulty levels against ten baselines, the proposed method achieves the highest task success. Ablation results confirm that structured command expansion, symbolic verification, selective LLM routing, and recovery skills are each individually necessary.

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) improves end-to-end classical planning in large language models (LLMs), but do these models also learn to represent and reason about the planning problems they are solving? Due to the relative complexity of classical planning problems and the challenge that end-to-end plan generation poses for LLMs, it has been difficult to explore this question. In our work, we devise and perform a series of interpretability experiments that holistically interrogate world model recovery by examining both internal representations and generative capabilities of fine-tuned LLMs. We find that: a) Supervised fine-tuning on valid action sequences enables LLMs to linearly encode action validity and some state predicates. b) Models that struggle to use output probabilities for classifying action validity may still learn internal representations that separate valid from invalid actions. c) Broader state space coverage during fine-tuning, such as from random walk data, yields more accurate recovery of the underlying world model. In summary, this work contributes a recipe for applying interpretability techniques to planning LLMs and generates insights that shed light on open questions about how knowledge is represented in LLMs.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a standard post-training paradigm for shaping large language models (LLMs) into capable agents. In agentic RL, the rollout stage generates trajectories while invoking tools, producing long-tailed and non-stationary workloads that expose two fundamental challenges. First, due to the long-tailed response distribution, a small fraction of trajectories dominates rollout makespan.Second, rollout and training differ in their compute patterns, memory demands, and sensitivity to sequence length. As the policy evolves, shifts in the workload distribution further change their relative resource demands, making it difficult to maintain balanced execution across the two stages. We present Libra, an adaptive runtime for agentic RL post-training with two complementary components: (1) intra-stage scheduling via a Causality-Guided Bucket Scheduler that routes requests across execution buckets with different parallelism configurations, reducing delays from rollout stragglers; and (2) cross-stage coordination that dynamically reallocates workers between rollout and training as the workload changes. It moves workers between the two stages through a non-blocking protocol without interrupting ongoing training. Evaluated on a 48x NVIDIA A800 GPU cluster and a 160x Ascend 910B3 NPU cluster across three agentic benchmarks, Libra achieves up to 4.2x higher throughput and up to 2.7x faster reward convergence

Planning records define restrictions over geographic areas, but their source documents often provide only indirect spatial evidence rather than machine-readable boundaries. We introduce Plan2Map, a 208-case multimodal benchmark for document-grounded geospatial boundary reconstruction from UK planning records. Given only a source planning document, systems must reconstruct a valid geospatial boundary from notice text, schedules, map plates, map labels, and boundary annotations; the reference GeoJSON is held out for scoring. We propose GeoPlanAgent, a document-grounded, geospatial-tool-in-the-loop system that decomposes the task into evidence extraction, localisation, map registration, boundary segmentation, projection, and verification. On Plan2Map, GeoPlanAgent achieves 0.736 mean IoU and 0.904 median IoU, with 67.8% of predictions at or above 0.8 IoU, substantially outperforming direct VLM-to-GeoJSON baselines. Diagnostic analysis shows that direct VLM prediction remains unreliable, while remaining errors are concentrated in localisation and map registration, and supervised boundary segmentation substantially improves pixel-level mask quality. Plan2Map provides a concrete testbed for multimodal geospatial reconstruction from public planning records. Project page: https://odeb1.github.io/Plan2Map_Project_Page/.

Current benchmarks for embodied vision-language planning often favor linguistic next-token prediction over physically grounded next-state reasoning. This rewards models that mimic statistical language priors rather than track causal dependencies, reducing physical planning to shallow sequence modeling. We argue that reliable physical autonomy requires a shift from linguistically grounded token prediction toward physically grounded causal reasoning. To this end, we introduce Causal-Plan-Bench, a high-fidelity diagnostic suite curated through multi-stage verification to evaluate embodied planning across four causal dimensions. We also construct Causal-Plan-1M, a million-scale corpus of explicit reasoning traces produced by a four-stage annotation pipeline over egocentric videos. Extensive evaluation shows that leading models still struggle to demonstrate genuine physical agency, with Gemini 3 Pro reaching only 38.18 on our benchmark. In contrast, our training recipe enables Causal Planner, built on Qwen3-VL-8B, to internalize physical logic for more accurate next-state estimation. The model achieves strong in-domain performance and cross-benchmark generalization, and reveals a Causal Scaling Law: scaling causal training data to one million instances yields a 36.3% relative gain, from 33.22 to 45.28. Overall, our work provides a concrete step toward turning agents from superficial token predictors into physically grounded causal reasoners.

LLM agents now draw on growing skill libraries to handle complex tasks. However, injecting more skills does not always improve task completion and can even degrade it. Existing methods still treat skill injection as a static step, selecting skills with fixed criteria, fixing the budget in advance, and leaving descriptions unchanged. We argue that this static treatment can undermine the utility of skills, because which skills are exposed, how many are included, and how they are presented all affect downstream performance. We propose SkillsInjector, a two-stage adaptive method that jointly addresses these decisions. First, a context planner learns execution-grounded skill preferences and admits an adaptive number of skills for each task. A set-aware renderer then tailors how selected descriptions are presented relative to their co-injected neighbors. Across tau2-bench, SkillsBench, and ALFWorld, SkillsInjector achieves the highest score, improving over the strongest baseline by 3.9, 6.1, and 7.3 percentage points, respectively. Ablation studies show that skill selection, adaptive budgeting, and set-aware rendering each contribute to the gain. These results show that skill-augmented agents benefit from optimizing the injected context itself. Code will be released upon publication

Growing attention to intelligent agents has put a spotlight on one of their central capabilities: planning. Early attempts to leverage large language models (LLMs) for planning relied on single-shot plan generation, followed by hybrid approaches that coupled LLMs with limited external search. These methods, unsound and incomplete by their very nature, often require substantial resources without yielding better solutions on unseen problems. As the limitations of LLMs become clearer, recent work has shifted toward using them at solution construction time -- generating symbolic solvers for a family of problems that can be verified and then used efficiently at inference time. This trend reflects the growing need for agents that are both reliable and resource-efficient. It also offers a path towards generating maintainable planners with minimal dependence on language models at inference time. In this paper, we argue that this shift reflects a broader realignment of the planning field in the LLM era. We examine three major categories of planner-generation methods, discuss their current limitations, and outline research steps towards a more reliable and efficient LLM-based generation of planners.

In flexible assembly systems, existing task planning methods require a time-consuming configuration process by multiple experts to establish a production line for a new product. To address this challenge, we propose a multi-agent based task planning framework for flexible assembly systems, denoted as AssemPlanner. It takes tasks described in natural language as input, which are then converted into actionable sequential production operations. It comprises several specialized agents, including SchedAgent , KnowledgeAgent, LineBalanceAgent, and a scene graph. Within the proposed framework, SchedAgent serves as the central reasoning engine. Departing from traditional static pipelines, AssemPlanner utilizes a ReAct-based SchedAgent to adaptively adjust actions via multi-agent feedback. By observing the feedback from KnowledgeAgent, LineBalanceAgent, and the scene graph, it autonomously resolves complex industrial process constraints. To facilitate reproducibility, all code and datasets are released at https://github.com/chz332/Assemplanner.

HTN planning is a variation of classical planning where, instead of searching for a linear sequence of actions, an algorithm decomposes higher-level tasks using a method library until only executable actions remain. On one hand, this allows one to introduce domain knowledge that can speed up the search for a solution through the method library. On the other hand, it creates challenges that go beyond those of classical state-space search. While recent research produced a number of heuristics and novel algorithms that speed up HTN planning, these heuristics are not yet as informative as those available in classical planning algorithms. We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can generate effective search heuristics for HTN planning, extending the methodology of Corrêa, Pereira, and Seipp (2025) from classical to hierarchical planning. Using the Pytrich planner on six standard total-order HTN benchmark domains, we evaluate heuristics generated by nine LLMs under domain-specific prompting and compare them against the TDG and LMCount domain-independent baselines and the PANDA planner. Our results show that LLM-generated heuristics nearly match the coverage of the best available HTN planner, while substantially reducing search effort on 83% of shared problems.

Generative models trained on synthetic plan data are a promising approach to generalized planning. Recent work has focused on finding any valid plan, rather than a high-quality solution. We address the challenge of producing high-quality plans, a computationally hard problem, in sub-exponential time. First, we demonstrate that, given optimal data, a decoder-only transformer can generate high-quality plans for unseen problem instances. Second, we show how to self-improve an initial model trained on sub-optimal data. Each round of self-improvement combines multiple model calls with graph search to generate improved plans, used for model fine-tuning. An experimental study on four domains: Blocksworld, Logistics, Labyrinth, and Sokoban, shows on average a 30% reduction in plan length over the source symbolic planner, with over 80% of plans being optimal, where the optimum is known. Plan quality is further improved by inference-time search. The model's latency scales sub-exponentially in contrast to the satisficing and optimal symbolic planners to which we compare. Together, these results suggest that self-improvement with generative models offers a scalable approach for high-quality plan generation.

Language model (LM)-based agents have demonstrated promising capabilities in automating complex tasks from natural language instructions, yet they continue to struggle with long-horizon planning and reasoning. To address this, we propose an enhanced multi-agent framework that decomposes automation into three roles: a planner for high-level decision-making, an actor for task execution, and a memory manager for contextual reasoning. While this modular decomposition aligns with established design patterns, our core contribution lies in a systematic compute-allocation analysis, revealing that planning is the dominant factor influencing task performance. Execution and memory management require significantly less compute and model capacity to achieve competitive results. Building on these insights, we introduce a planner-centric reinforcement learning approach, which exclusively optimizes the planner using trajectory-level rewards from a VLM-as-judge, while freezing the other components. Extensive experiments on benchmarks spanning web navigation, OS control, and tool use demonstrate that concentrating model capacity and learning on high-level planning yields robust and compute-efficient improvements in long-horizon agent automation. Our code is publicly released.

LLM agents increasingly operate in open-ended environments spanning hundreds of sequential episodes, yet they remain largely stateless: each task is solved from scratch without converting past experience into better future behavior. The central obstacle is not \emph{what} to remember but \emph{how to use} what has been remembered, including which retrieval policy to apply, how to interpret prior outcomes, and when the current strategy itself must change. We introduce \emph{Agent Evolving Learning} (\ael{}), a two-timescale framework that addresses this obstacle. At the fast timescale, a Thompson Sampling bandit learns which memory retrieval policy to apply at each episode; at the slow timescale, LLM-driven reflection diagnoses failure patterns and injects causal insights into the agent's decision prompt, giving it an interpretive frame for the evidence it retrieves. On a sequential portfolio benchmark (10 sector-diverse tickers, 208 episodes, 5 random seeds), \ael{} achieves a Sharpe ratio of 2.13$\pm$0.47, outperforming five published self-improving methods and all non-LLM baselines while maintaining the lowest variance among all LLM-based approaches. A nine-variant ablation reveals a ``less is more'' pattern: memory and reflection together produce a 58% cumulative improvement over the stateless baseline, yet every additional mechanism we test (planner evolution, per-tool selection, cold-start initialization, skill extraction, and three credit assignment methods) \emph{degrades} performance. This demonstrates that the bottleneck in agent self-improvement is \emph{self-diagnosing how to use} experience rather than adding architectural complexity. Code and data: https://github.com/WujiangXu/AEL.

We introduce SuperIgor, a framework for instruction-following tasks. Unlike prior methods that rely on predefined subtasks, SuperIgor enables a language model to generate and refine high-level plans through a self-learning mechanism, reducing the need for manual dataset annotation. Our approach involves iterative co-training: an RL agent is trained to follow the generated plans, while the language model adapts and modifies these plans based on RL feedback and preferences. This creates a feedback loop where both the agent and the planner improve jointly. We validate our framework in environments with rich dynamics and stochasticity. Results show that SuperIgor agents adhere to instructions more strictly than baseline methods, while also demonstrating strong generalization to previously unseen instructions.

Emotional interaction is increasingly crucial for conversational AI, yet current systems lack a self-emotion determination mechanism to drive the streaming text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis. We propose an emotion-planning framework that determines the emotion prior to the textual generation, grounding the downstream emotional TTS in a streaming manner. The framework is implemented by a plug-and-play LLM module, initialized from pretrained LLMs, and trained by reinforcement learning (RL) with emotions as the actions. A hybrid reward is employed which combines imitation signals with theory-driven scoring, in which the theory of Plutchik's wheel of emotions is adopted. By experiments on DailyDialog, EmoryNLP, IMEOCAP, and MELD, our method outperforms prompting and finetuning baselines on both emotion determination and response quality. We finally implement an entire streaming pipeline for real-time deployment, with the speech quality confirming the framework's emotional alignment, contextual coherence, and expressive fluency. Codes, cases, and demos are available in https://sixingdeguo.github.io/EmoQ-page/.

Large language models are increasingly used as planners for robotic systems, yet how safely they plan remains an open question. To evaluate safe planning systematically, we introduce DESPITE, a benchmark of 12,279 tasks spanning physical and normative dangers with fully deterministic validation. Across 23 models, even near-perfect planning ability does not ensure safety: the best-planning model fails to produce a valid plan on only 0.4% of tasks but produces dangerous plans on 28.3%. Among 18 open-source models from 3B to 671B parameters, planning ability improves substantially with scale (0.4-99.3%) while safety awareness remains relatively flat (38-57%). We identify a multiplicative relationship between these two capacities, showing that larger models complete more tasks safely primarily through improved planning, not through better danger avoidance. Three proprietary reasoning models reach notably higher safety awareness (71-81%), while non-reasoning proprietary models and open-source reasoning models remain below 57%. As planning ability approaches saturation for frontier models, improving safety awareness becomes a central challenge for deploying language-model planners in robotic systems.

Safe and explainable motion planning remains a central challenge in autonomous driving. While rule-based planners offer predictable and explainable behavior, they often fail to grasp the complexity and uncertainty of real-world traffic. Conversely, learned planners exhibit strong adaptability but suffer from reduced transparency and occasional safety violations. We introduce Mosaic, a framework for structured decision-making that integrates both paradigms through arbitration graphs. By decoupling trajectory verification and selection from the generation of trajectories by individual planners, every decision becomes transparent and traceable. This separation lets verification and trajectory selection contribute independently: centralized verification acts as a safety floor, reducing at-fault collisions from 25 for each standalone planner to 16. In contrast, per-step trajectory selection acts as a performance ceiling, combining the complementary strengths of a rule-based and a learned planner. In experimental evaluation on nuPlan, Mosaic achieves 95.56 CLS-NR and 94.18 CLS-R on the Val14 closed-loop benchmark, setting a new state of the art. On the interPlan benchmark, focused on highly interactive and out-of-distribution scenarios, Mosaic scores 54.10 CLS-R, outperforming its best constituent planner by 22.8% -- all without retraining or requiring additional data. The code is available at github.com/KIT-MRT/mosaic.

Embodied agents are intelligent systems designed to perceive, reason, and act within the physical world. While the robotics community has long strived to build such versatile agents, a fundamental limitation persists: most current VLA-based models operate under a rigid ``Listen-and-Act'' paradigm. These systems assume instructions are unambiguous and execute them in a passive fashion, preventing them from resolving uncertainty through dialogue. To address this, we propose Ask-to-Clarify, a unified end-to-end framework that seamlessly integrates multi-turn disambiguation dialogue with low-level visuomotor control, eliminating the reliance on high-level action primitives or external planners. Specifically, Ask-to-Clarify synergizes a VLM-based Cognitive Planner with a Diffusion-based Motor Executor. To bridge the disparity between high-level disambiguation and low-level execution, we introduce a Semantic-Visual Alignment Adapter, which functions as a cross-modal interface to synthesize semantic intent with visual perceptual streams. Furthermore, we observe severe catastrophic forgetting: visuomotor fine-tuning completely erases dialogue capabilities. To overcome this, we propose a two-stage knowledge-insulation training strategy, effectively decoupling dialogue logic from physical manipulation. Extensive evaluations across 11 real-world tasks demonstrate that \framework{} significantly outperforms existing methods, offering a promising path toward building truly collaborative embodied agents.