Autonomous Driving

World models, which simulate environmental dynamics and generate sensor observations, are gaining increasing attention in autonomous driving. However, progress in LiDAR-based world models has lagged behind those built on camera videos or occupancy data, primarily due to two core challenges: the inherent disorder of LiDAR point clouds and the difficulty of distinguishing dynamic objects from static structures. To address these issues, we propose GEM: a Generative LiDAR world model that leverages deformable mamba architecture, significantly improving fidelity and imaginative capability. Specifically, leveraging the structural similarity between sequential laser scanning and Mamba's processing mechanism, we first tokenize LiDAR sweeps into compact representations via a custom LiDAR scene tokenizer. After unsupervised disentanglement of tokenized features via a dynamic-static separator, a tri-path deformable Mamba is introduced to perform selective scanning and adaptive gating fusion over the disentangled features, leading to enhanced spatial-temporal understanding of the world evolution. Optionally, a planner and a BEV layout controller can be integrated to explore the model's capability for autonomous rollout and its potential to generate ``what-if" scenarios. Extensive experiments show that GEM achieves state-of-the-art performances across diverse benchmarks and evaluation settings, demonstrating its superiority and effectiveness. Project page: https://github.com/wuyang98/GEM.

Risk-aware navigation should be selective: a policy should expose evasive degrees of freedom only when the local scene admits a lower-risk feasible maneuver, and suppress them when no safer alternative exists. We show that adding one context-energy term to a port-Hamiltonian navigation policy produces a learned force channel with exactly this falsifiable signature. When the local risk field contains a feasible lower-risk direction, the induced context force activates toward it; when the apparent escape is blocked or not yet available, a route-aware gate suppresses lateral force rather than hallucinating an unsafe maneuver. A CVaR tail-risk objective focuses gradient updates on rare but consequential risk transitions. We validate the selectivity signature across four settings. In the primary delayed-required-escape benchmark, route-aware CVaR reduces premature force activation from 0.950 to 0.180 versus DWA while raising success from 0.480 to 0.810 with zero replans. On real off-road terrain (RELLIS-3D), route-aware enrichment achieves correct activation rate 0.837 and false activation rate 0.114, compared to 0.378/0.752 for scalar risk gradients. On static semantic maps (DFC2018), enrichment reduces catastrophic failure from 0.60 to 0.10 and oscillation by 90.7% while preserving path efficiency. In highway traffic, collisions drop from 100% to 0% when a lane escape is feasible; when no escape exists, the policy suppresses the lateral maneuver. The selectivity property follows from the gradient structure of the context energy rather than from training-time tuning.

As vehicles transition toward higher levels of automation, Driver Monitoring Systems (DMS) have become essential for ensuring human oversight, safety, and regulatory compliance in a vehicle. These systems rely on multimodal sensing and AI-driven inference to assess driver attention, cognitive state, and readiness to take control. While technologically promising, their deployment introduces a complex set of ethical and legal challenges - ranging from privacy and consent to data ownership and algorithmic fairness. While overarching frameworks such as the GDPR, EU AI Act, and IEEE standards offer important guidance, they lack the specificity required for addressing the unique risks posed by in-cabin sensing technologies. This paper adopts a review-to-design perspective, critically examining existing regulatory instruments and ethical frameworks -- such as the GDPR, the EU AI Act, and IEEE guidelines -- and identifying gaps in their applicability to the distinctive risks posed by multimodal, AI-enabled in-cabin monitoring. Building on this review, we propose a modular ethical design framework tailored specifically to Driver Monitoring Systems. The framework translates high-level principles into actionable design and deployment guidance, including user-configurable consent mechanisms, fairness-aware model development, transparency and explainability tools, and safeguards for driver emotional well-being. Finally, the paper outlines a risk analysis and failure mitigation strategy, emphasizing proactive incident response and accountability mechanisms tailored to the DMS context. Together, these contributions aim to inform the development of transparent, trustworthy, and human-centered driver monitoring systems for next-generation autonomous vehicles.

Safe L2/L3 driving automation requires anticipating human-in-the-loop reactions during shared-control transitions. While most driving world models forecast the external environment, in-cabin intelligence remains strictly recognition-oriented and lacks multi-step rollout capabilities for driver dynamics. We introduce Driver-WM, a driver-centric latent world model that rolls out in-cabin dynamics causally conditioned on out-cabin traffic context. This formulation unifies physical kinematics forecasting with auxiliary behavioral and emotional semantic recognition. Operating in a compact latent space constructed from frozen vision-language features, Driver-WM adopts a dual-stream architecture to separately encode external traffic and internal driver states. These streams are directionally coupled via a gated causal injection mechanism, which uses a learned vector gate to modulate external contextual perturbations while strictly enforcing temporal causality. Experiments on AIDE show robust long-horizon forecasting on reactive high-motion clips, improved driver/traffic semantic alignment, and controlled interventions that expose the external-to-internal mechanism.

Autonomous driving must operate across diverse surfaces to enable safe mobility. However, most driving datasets are captured on well-paved flat roads. Moreover, recent driving datasets primarily provide sparse LiDAR ground truth for images, which is insufficient for assessing fine-grained geometry in depth estimation and completion. To address these gaps, we introduce CARD, a multi-modal driving dataset that delivers quasi-dense 3D ground truth across continuous sequences rich in speed bumps, potholes, irregular surfaces and off-road segments. Our sensor suite includes synchronized global-shutter stereo cameras, front and rear LiDARs, 6-DoF poses from LiDAR-inertial odometry, per-wheel motion traces, and full calibration. Notably, our multi-LiDAR fusion yields ~500K valid depth pixels per frame, about 6.5x more than KITTI Depth Completion and 10x more on average than other public driving datasets. The dataset spans ~110 km and 4.7 hours across Germany and Italy. In addition, CARD provides 2D bounding boxes targeting road-topography irregularities, enabling accurate benchmarking for both geometry and perception tasks. Furthermore, we establish a standardized evaluation protocol for road surface irregularities on CARD and benchmark state-of-the-art depth estimation models to provide strong baselines. The CARD dataset is hosted on https://huggingface.co/CARD-Data.

Feedforward Gaussian Splatting has recently emerged as an efficient paradigm for 4D reconstruction in autonomous driving. However, in unstructured off-road scenes, its performance degrades due to high-frequency geometry, ego-motion jitter, and increased non-rigid dynamics. These factors introduce conflicting Gaussian observations across timestamps, leading to either over-smoothed renderings or structural artifacts. To address this issue, we propose Ground4D, a spatially-grounded 4D feedforward framework for pose-free off-road reconstruction. The key idea is to resolve temporal conflicts through spatially localized conditioning. Specifically, we introduce voxel-grounded temporal Gaussian aggregation, which partitions the canonical Gaussian space into spatial voxels and performs query-conditioned temporal attention within each voxel. Intra-voxel softmax normalization ensures that temporal selectivity and spatial occupancy become mutually reinforcing rather than conflicting. We furthermore introduce surface normal cues as auxiliary geometric guidance to regularize the geometry of Gaussian primitives. Extensive experiments on ORAD-3D and RELLIS-3D demonstrate that Ground4D consistently outperforms existing feedforward methods in reconstruction quality and generalizes zero-shot to unseen off-road domains. Project page and code:https://github.com/wsnbws/Ground4D.

Scene understanding is a vital part of autonomous driving systems, which requires the use of deep learning models. Deep learning methods are intrinsically black box models, which lack transparency and safety in autonomous driving. To make these systems transparent, multi-task visual understanding has become crucial for explainable autonomous driving perception systems, where simultaneous prediction of multiple driving behaviors and their underlying explanations is essential for safe navigation and human trust in autonomous vehicles. In order to design an accurate and cross-cultural explainable autonomous driving system, we introduce a comprehensive confidence threshold sensitivity analysis that evaluates various threshold values to identify optimal decision boundaries for different tasks. Our analysis demonstrates that traditional fixed threshold approaches are suboptimal for multi-task scenarios. Through extensive evaluation, we demonstrate that our adaptive threshold selection methodology improves F1-scores across different tasks. In addition, we introduce IUST-XAI-AD, a novel dataset consisting of 958 images with human annotations for driving decisions and corresponding reasoning. This dataset addresses the critical gap in domain-specific evaluation benchmarks for distinct driving contexts and provides a more challenging test environment compared to existing datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that confidence threshold sensitivity analysis can significantly improve model performance, while the introduction of the IUST-XAI-AD dataset reveals important insights about cross-cultural driving behavior patterns. The combined contributions of this work provide both methodological advances and practical evaluation tools that can accelerate the development of more reliable, explainable, and culturally-adaptive autonomous driving systems for global deployment.

Autonomous systems increasingly rely on machine-learning (ML) components for safety-critical tasks such as perception and control in autonomous vehicles (AVs). While ML enables essential capabilities, it inevitably exhibits long-tail faults that make it unsuitable for safety-critical tasks. Runtime assurance (RTA) mitigates this issue by pairing ML components with verifiable safety monitors, e.g., Control Simplex and Perception Simplex architectures. However, the limited performance of safety monitors remains a major bottleneck. The Synergistic Simplex (SS) architecture improves system performance by enabling bidirectional integration between ML components and safety monitors while preserving formal safety guarantees. The key innovation here is allowing safety monitors to use ML outputs, which is typically prohibited in RTA systems. We formally derive conditions under which this integration preserves safety and demonstrate the performance benefits. We present the design, analysis, and evaluation of SS for AV obstacle detection.

Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) control is a powerful sampling-based strategy for nonlinear autonomous systems. However, its performance is often bottlenecked by the fidelity of nominal dynamics. We propose ICODE-MPPI, a robust framework that leverages Input Concomitant Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (ICODEs) to learn and compensate for unmodeled residual dynamics. Unlike discrete-time learners, ICODEs maintain physical consistency and temporal continuity during the MPPI prediction horizon. High-fidelity simulations on complex trajectories demonstrate that ICODE-MPPI achieves up to a 69% reduction in cross-tracking error under persistent disturbances compared to standard MPPI control. Furthermore, our analysis confirms that ICODE-MPPI significantly suppresses control chattering, yielding smoother steering commands and superior robust performance.

Online mapping and end-to-end (E2E) planning in autonomous driving remain largely sensor-centric, leaving rich map priors, including HD/SD vector maps, rasterized SD maps, and satellite imagery, underused because of heterogeneity, pose drift, and inconsistent availability at test time. We present UMPE, a Unified Map Prior Encoder that can ingest any subset of four priors and fuse them with BEV features for both mapping and planning. UMPE has two branches. The vector encoder pre-aligns HD/SD polylines with a frame-wise SE(2) correction, encodes points via multi-frequency sinusoidal features, and produces polyline tokens with confidence scores. BEV queries then apply cross-attention with confidence bias, followed by normalized channel-wise gating to avoid length imbalance and softly down-weight uncertain sources. The raster encoder shares a ResNet-18 backbone conditioned by FiLM with scaling and shift at every stage, performs SE(2) micro-alignment, and injects priors through zero-initialized residual fusion, so the network starts from a do-no-harm baseline and learns to add only useful prior evidence. A vector-then-raster fusion order reflects the inductive bias of geometry first, appearance second. On nuScenes mapping, UMPE lifts MapTRv2 from 61.5 to 67.4 mAP (+5.9) and MapQR from 66.4 to 71.7 mAP (+5.3). On Argoverse2, UMPE adds +4.1 mAP over strong baselines. UMPE is compositional: when trained with all priors, it outperforms single-prior models even when only one prior is available at test time, demonstrating powerset robustness. For E2E planning with the VAD backbone on nuScenes, UMPE reduces trajectory error from 0.72 to 0.42 m L2 on average (-0.30 m) and collision rate from 0.22% to 0.12% (-0.10%), surpassing recent prior-injection methods. These results show that a unified, alignment-aware treatment of heterogeneous map priors yields better mapping and better planning.

Autonomous driving technology has rapidly evolved over the past decade, offering significant improvements in transportation efficiency, safety, and cost reduction. While much of the progress has focused on highway driving and obstacle avoidance, low-speed maneuvers such as parking remain among the most difficult challenges for autonomous systems. This challenge is especially pronounced in trailer-truck transport vehicles due to their articulated motion and environmental constraints. This paper presents a proposed framework for autonomous truck parking that integrates perception, motion planning, control systems, and infrastructure awareness. By combining sensor fusion, Hybrid A* path planning, nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC), and data-driven parking systems, this work highlights the importance of system-level coordination for reliable and scalable autonomous parking solutions. As a proof-of-concept implementation, we adapted an open-source A* path planning simulation to incorporate a tractor-trailer kinematic model, demonstrating articulated vehicle path planning within a command-line simulation environment, with jackknife prevention identified as an area requiring further development.

Platooning of connected and automated vehicles provides significant benefits in terms of energy efficiency, traffic throughput, and, most critically, safety. These safety benefits depend on string stability, which dictates how disturbances propagate along a vehicle string. Although longitudinal string stability has been extensively examined, lateral string stability, which governs the propagation of path-tracking errors that can lead to unsafe deviations from the desired path, remains underexplored. Its importance is growing as autonomous vehicles increasingly depend on onboard sensing and map-free navigation, where sensor occlusions and tight formations amplify safety risks. This paper presents a framework for lateral string stability that focuses directly on safety-critical, path-relative tracking errors and enables consistent comparison across vehicles that follow the same planned path. The key element of the framework is an arc-length (Eulerian) viewpoint, a departure from traditional analyses, that clarifies how tracking errors at a given point on the path propagate from one vehicle to the next. Building on this foundation, we propose the definition of L2 lateral string stability along with two control strategies: a feedback-feedforward strategy that relies solely on onboard sensing, and a novel learn-from-predecessor strategy that makes use of vehicle-to-vehicle communication. Both strategies are analyzed for lateral string stability with respect to two error measures: tracking error vector and lateral (cross-track) error. Our results show that onboard sensing alone cannot guarantee attenuation of path-tracking errors, imposing a fundamental safety limitation, while V2V communication enables true error attenuation. The analysis further identifies structural controller requirements, showing that nonzero feedback on specific measurements is essential for guaranteeing stability.

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are widely known to follow conservative, rule-based motion policies that surrounding drivers can learn to anticipate. A direct consequence is that human drivers may accept shorter longitudinal gaps when cutting in front of an AV than when targeting another human-driven vehicle (HDV). We test this hypothesis using the Waymo Open Motion Dataset (WOMD), which provides 25,906 real-world highway scenarios at 10 hertz. An eight-criterion lane-change detector extracts 706 HDV-to-AV and 3,172 HDV-to-HDV cut-in events from the same traffic environment. The median accepted gap in front of the Waymo AV is 7.58 meters versus 9.57 meters for HDV targets, a 1.99 meter reduction that is statistically significant (p equals 5.76 times 10 to the negative eighth power, d equals negative 0.224) and persists under speed-matched resampling. Cut-in speeds toward the AV are 37 percent higher (51.7 versus 37.7 kilometers per hour, d equals 0.502), and 68.0 percent of AV-targeted cut-ins occur below the 10 meter gap boundary versus 51.8 percent of HDV-targeted events (chi-squared equals 60.5, p is less than 10 to the negative thirteenth power). These results reveal a systematic and safety-relevant asymmetry in human gap-acceptance behavior that warrants AV-specific calibration of both motion-planning safety envelopes and traffic simulation models.

Online High-Definition (HD) map construction is a key component of autonomous driving. Recent methods rely on multi-view camera images for cost-effective HD map segmentation, but cameras lack depth information for accurate scene geometry. In contrast, LiDAR provides precise 3D measurements but lacks dense semantic cues. In this work, we propose LIE, LiDAR-only semantic map construction method that employ Knowledge Distillation (KD) to handle the lack of dense semantic and texture cues. Specifically, the teacher branch fuses student LiDAR features and the corresponding 2D intensity map tile to provide dense supervision for segmenting map elements using online distillation scheme. Experimental results show that our method outperforms all single-modality approaches, achieving 8.2% higher mIoU than the state-of-the-art camera-based model on nuScenes. LIE is robust over long ranges and under challenging weather and lighting, and efficiently adapts to Argoverse2 with only 10% fine-tuning, surpassing camera-based models trained on the full dataset. Source code will be available here.

Partial driving automation creates a tension: drivers remain legally responsible while being less active in control. Meaningful human control (MHC), a normative framework that can potentially address this tension, proposes that automated systems are designed to track relevant human reasons and that humans should at all times remain in control and be responsible. However, empirical methods for evaluating whether systems are under MHC remain underdeveloped. In this driving simulator study, we investigated the extent to which 24 drivers experienced MHC when interacting with partially automated driving systems under two modes - haptic shared control and traded control. During overtaking manoeuvres on a two-lane, two-way road with fully automated longitudinal control and partially automated lateral control, drivers' actions were necessary to prevent crashes due to silent automation failures. Starting from hypotheses derived from the properties of systems under MHC, we used a mixed-methods approach that links behavioural metrics, subjective post-trial ratings, and qualitative feedback to assess drivers' perception of responsibility and control. A confirmatory analysis indicated a negative correlation between the perception of the automated vehicle understanding the driver and conflict in steering torques. Qualitative feedback revealed that mismatches in intentions between the driver and automation, lack of safety, and resistance to driver inputs reduced perceived MHC, while subtle haptic guidance aligned with driver intent had a positive effect. Thus, future designs should prioritise effortless driver interventions, transparent communication of automation intent through haptic, visual or auditory cues, and clear authority allocation to strengthen meaningful human control in partially automated driving.

The application of computer vision is gradually increasing across various domains. They employ deep learning models with a black-box nature. Without the ability to explain the behavior of neural networks, especially their decision-making processes, it is not possible to recognize their efficiency, predict system failures, or effectively implement them in real-world applications. Due to the inevitable use of deep learning in fully automated driving systems, many methods have been proposed to explain their behavior; however, they suffer from flawed reasoning and unreliable metrics, which have prevented a comprehensive understanding of complex models in autonomous vehicles and hindered the development of truly reliable systems. In this study, we propose a multi-scale attention-based model in which driving decisions are fed into the reasoning component to provide case-specific explanations for each decision simultaneously. For quantitative evaluation of our model's performance, we employ the F1-score metric, and also proposed a new metric called the Joint F1 score to demonstrate the accurate and reliable performance of the model in terms of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). In addition to the BDD-OIA dataset, the nu-AR dataset is utilized to further validate the generalization capability and robustness of the proposed network. The results demonstrate the superiority of our reasoning network over the classic and state-of-the-art models.

As autonomous vehicles slowly deploy into urban roads for limited use cases with significant edge case issues, closed facilities like marshaling yards provide a ripe case for combining lower-level vehicle autonomy with fixed infrastructure to create full autonomy without similar edge case concerns. Within a delivery marshaling yard, electric fleet vehicles complete a set of sequential tasks (charging, inspection, cleaning, and loading) before exiting the yard with their new load of deliveries. Hybrid automation of the vehicles and infrastructure can allow these vehicles to reach full autonomy and navigate the facility without the need of a driver, allowing for quicker movement between tasks increasing vehicle throughput. However, isolated autonomous operations based on static rules are prone to gridlock causing facility failures that temporarily shut down operations. Our orchestrated autonomy solution uses decentralized, dynamic priority scoring of vehicles based on the current status of the marshaling yard to optimally assign vehicles to tasks to increase vehicle throughput. Using a simulated facility with three marshaling yard sizes (small, medium, and large) and three demand levels (low, medium, high), we demonstrated that our orchestration solution increases vehicle throughput above static, isolated autonomy for all combinations of yard size and demand, while reducing facility failures at high demand levels.

Open-loop evaluation offers fast, reproducible assessment of autonomous driving planners, but its ability to predict real closed-loop driving performance remains questionable. Prior work has shown that traditional open-loop metrics such as Average Displacement Error (ADE) and Final Displacement Error (FDE) exhibit no reliable correlation with closed-loop Driving Score. In this paper, we ask whether the more recent, safety-aware open-loop metrics introduced by NAVSIM~v2 can bridge this gap. By systematically cross-referencing published results from 15 state-of-the-art methods across NAVSIM (open-loop) and Bench2Drive (closed-loop), we compile a paired dataset of open-loop sub-metrics and closed-loop performance, yielding 8 methods with complete paired data. Our analysis reveals three key findings: (1) the aggregate NAVSIM PDM Score shows a strong positive but non-monotonic correlation with Bench2Drive Driving Score, with clear ranking inversions; (2) among individual NAVSIM sub-metrics, Ego Progress (EP) is the strongest single predictor of closed-loop success, substantially exceeding the safety-critical collision metric NC; (3) the safety-progress trade-off manifests differently in open-loop and closed-loop: methods that maximize safety at the expense of progress rank highly in NAVSIM but underperform in closed-loop due to timeout and slow-driving penalties. We further demonstrate that a much simpler 3-metric formula matches the predictive power of the full 5-metric PDMS at the same Spearman $ρ{=}0.90$ on our paired sample of $n{=}8$ methods, suggesting that within current state-of-the-art methods -- where TTC and Comfort approach saturation -- these two sub-metrics add little marginal information for closed-loop ranking. Additionally, we identify the snowball effect -- where small open-loop deviations compound into closed-loop failures -- as a candidate mechanism for the residual gap.

Off-road nighttime autonomous driving suffers from unreliable visible-light perception, making infrared modality crucial for accurate freespace detection. However, progress remains limited due to the scarcity of annotated infrared off-road datasets and the inter-frame inconsistencies inherent to current single-frame methods. To address these gaps, we present the IRON dataset, which, to our knowledge, is the first large-scale infrared dataset for off-road temporal freespace detection under all-day conditions, with strong support for nighttime perception. The dataset comprises 24,314 densely annotated infrared images with synchronized RGB images in diverse scenes and different light conditions. Building upon this dataset, we propose IRONet, a novel flow-free framework for temporal freespace detection that addresses inter-frame inconsistencies by aggregating historical context via a memory-attention mechanism and a carefully designed mask decoder. On our IRON dataset, IRONet achieves state-of-the-art performance, reaching 82.93%(+1.19%) IoU and 90.66%(+0.71%) F1 score at real-time inference. Remarkably, IRONet also exhibits robust generalization to RGB modalities on ORFD and Rellis datasets. Overall, our work establishes a foundation for reliable all-day off-road autonomous driving and future research in infrared temporal perception. The code and IRON dataset are available at https://github.com/wsnbws/IRON.

This paper revisits camera pose estimation through the lens of self-supervised pretraining, focusing on inverse-dynamics pretraining as a scalable alternative to the current trend of fully supervised training with 3D annotations. Concretely, we employ inverse- and forward-dynamics models to learn latent action representations, similar to Genie from large-scale driving videos. Our idea is simple yet effective. Existing methods use latent actions in their original capacity, that is, as action conditioning of world-models or as proxies of robot action parameters in policy networks. Our method, dubbed LA-Pose, repurposes the latent action features as inputs to a camera pose estimator, finetuned on a limited set of high-quality 3D annotations. This formulation enables accurate and generalizable pose prediction while maintaining feed-forward efficiency. Extensive experiments on driving benchmarks show that LA-Pose achieves competitive and even superior performance to state-of-the-art methods while using orders of magnitude less labeled data. Concretely, on the Waymo and PandaSet benchmarks, LA-Pose achieves over 10% higher pose accuracy than recent feed-forward methods. To our knowledge, this work is the first to demonstrate the power of inverse-dynamics self-supervised learning for pose estimation.

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in autonomous driving because they combine visual perception with language-based reasoning, supporting more interpretable decision-making, yet their robustness to physical adversarial attacks, especially whether such attacks transfer across different VLM architectures, is not well understood and poses a practical risk when attackers do not know which model a vehicle uses. We address this gap with a systematic cross-architecture study of adversarial transferability in VLM-based driving, evaluating three representative architectures (Dolphins, OmniDrive, and LeapVAD) using physically realizable patches placed on roadside infrastructure in both crosswalk and highway scenarios. Our transfer-matrix evaluation shows high cross-architecture effectiveness, with transfer rates of 73-91% (mean TR = 0.815 for crosswalk and 0.833 for highway) and sustained frame-level manipulation over 64.7-79.4% of the critical decision window even when patches are not optimized for the target model.

We present a priority-aware intelligent lane change advisory system based on multi-agent federated reinforcement learning, namely PALCAS, for autonomous vehicles (AVs). While existing lane-change approaches typically focus on single-agent systems or centralized multi-agent systems, we introduce a federated reinforcement learning-based multi-agent lane change system prioritizing lane changing based on vehicle destination urgency. PALCAS incorporates a novel priority-aware safe lane-change reward function to enable judicious lane-change decisions in both mandatory and discretionary scenarios. PALCAS leverages the parameterized deep Q-network (PDQN) algorithm to facilitate effective cooperation among agents, enabling both lateral and longitudinal motion controls of AVs. Extensive simulations conducted using the SUMO traffic simulator and Mosaic V2X communication framework demonstrate that PALCAS significantly improves traffic efficiency, driving safety, comfort, destination arrival rates, and merging success rates compared to baseline methods.

Anticipating traffic accidents is a critical yet unresolved problem for autonomous driving, hindered by the inherent complexity of modeling interactions between road users and the limited availability of diverse, large-scale datasets. To address these issues, we propose a dual-path framework. On the one hand, we employ a video synthesis pipeline that, guided by structured prompts, derives feature distributions from existing corpora and produces high-fidelity synthetic driving scenes consistent with the statistical patterns of real data. On the other hand, we design a graph neural network enriched with semantic cues, enabling dynamic reasoning over both spatial and semantic relations among participants. To validate the effectiveness of our approach, we release a new benchmark dataset containing standardized, finely annotated video sequences that cover a broad spectrum of regions, weather, and traffic conditions. Evaluations across existing datasets and our new benchmark confirm notable gains in both accuracy and anticipation lead time, highlighting the capacity of the proposed framework to mitigate current data bottlenecks and enhance the reliability of autonomous driving systems.

Vehicle platooning has attracted increasing attention as a promising approach to improve traffic efficiency, energy consumption, and roadway safety through coordinated multi-vehicle operation. A key challenge in platooning lies in maintaining stable and accurate path tracking during dynamic maneuvers such as lane changes, where lateral deviations and heading disturbances generated by the lead vehicle may propagate downstream to following vehicles. Robust longitudinal and lateral control systems are therefore essential not only for individual vehicle tracking performance, but also for overall platoon stability. For experimental studies, the Intelligent Mobility and Robotics Lab (IMRL) develops a scaled multi-vehicle platform for autonomous platooning research, with a particular emphasis on cooperative control and human-in-the-loop autonomy. This platform consists of one human-operable lead vehicle and two autonomous followers, enabling controlled and repeatable experiments on leader-follower coordination. Compared with full-scale field testing, this scaled platform offers a safer, lower-cost, and more flexible environment for rapid prototyping, controller validation, and multi-agent autonomy studies, while providing stronger physical realism than purely simulation-based evaluations.

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) increasingly rely on vision-based perception and learning-based control, necessitating experimental platforms that support realistic hardware-in-the-loop validation. Small-scale platforms for autonomous racing offer a practical path to hardware validation, but often suffer from limited modularity, high integration complexity, or restricted extensibility. This paper presents TEACAR, a 1/14- to 1/16-scale autonomous driving platform designed with modular mechanical architecture, hardware abstraction, and ROS 2-based software. The system adopts a four-layer deck structure that physically decouples sensing, computation, actuation, and power subsystems, improving structural rigidity while simplifying reconfiguration. We constructed and comprehensively evaluated the prototype of TEACAR. Its mechanical stability, structural characteristics, and software performance were quantified based on three CNN-based steering controllers. Inference latency, power consumption, and system operating time were measured to evaluate computational capability and robustness. Our experiments demonstrated that TEACAR offers a scalable, modular, and cost-effective testbed for ITS research, education, and development. Our project repository is available on GitHub.

Driving in compliance with traffic laws and regulations is a basic requirement for human drivers, yet autonomous vehicles (AVs) can violate these requirements in diverse real-world scenarios. To encode law compliance into AV systems, conventional approaches use formal logic languages to explicitly specify behavioral constraints, but this process is labor-intensive, hard to scale, and costly to maintain. With recent advances in artificial intelligence, it is promising to leverage large language models (LLMs) to derive legal requirements from traffic laws and regulations. However, without explicitly grounding and reasoning in structured traffic scenarios, LLMs often retrieve irrelevant provisions or miss applicable ones, yielding imprecise requirements. To address this, we propose a novel pipeline that grounds LLM reasoning in a traffic scenario taxonomy through node-wise anchors that encode hierarchical semantics. On Chinese traffic laws and OnSite dataset (5,897 scenarios), our method improves law-scenario matching by 29.1% and increases the accuracy of derived mandatory and prohibitive requirements by 36.9% and 38.2%, respectively. We further demonstrate real-world applicability by constructing a law-compliance layer for AV navigation and developing an onboard, real-time compliance monitor for in-field testing, providing a solid foundation for future AV development, deployment, and regulatory oversight.

Automated vehicles (AVs) are commonly programmed to yield unconditionally to pedestrians in the interest of safety. However, this design choice can give rise to the Freezing Robot Problem in which pedestrians learn to assert priority at every interaction, causing vehicles to stall and make no progress. The game theoretic Sequential Chicken model has shown that, like human drivers, AVs can resolve this problem by trading credible threats of very small risks of collision or larger risks of less severe invasion of personal space against the value of time due to yielding delays. This paper presents the first demonstration and evaluation of this approach using a real AV with human subjects and shows that pedestrian behavior under experimentally constrained safety conditions can be well fitted by Sequential Chicken, with a low time value of collision, suggestive of their planning to avoid proxemic personal space penalties as well as actual collisions.

Inefficient driving behaviors, such as overly conservative yielding, remain a key obstacle to deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs). Instantaneous driving efficiency metrics are crucial for self-driving decision-making because they affect real-time performance evaluation and control optimization. However, commonly used indicators, including speed, relative speed, and inter-vehicle distance, are limited in capturing traffic context and in ensuring consistency between instantaneous outputs and travel-level outcomes. This study proposes the Projected Attainable Speed Space (PASS) model, a unified framework for driving efficiency assessment across instantaneous and travel-level analyses by integrating kinematic and spatial traffic information. PASS characterizes instantaneous driving efficiency with two coupled elements: potential for speed improvement (available acceleration space) and response to that potential (utilization of available acceleration space). Available acceleration space is referenced to projected attainable speed, derived from an idealized catch-up maneuver using relative speed and spacing to the leading vehicle; utilization is represented by the temporal change in available acceleration space. To ensure cross-scale consistency, time-aggregated PASS is defined as a travel-level efficiency metric. Trajectory data from a driving simulation experiment are used for parameter calibration to maximize agreement between time-aggregated PASS and observed travel times. Across 10 lane-change events, results show strong consistency, with an average coefficient of determination of 0.913, validating PASS for consistent efficiency evaluation across instantaneous and travel-level temporal scales. This study provides a unified, physically grounded framework that supports real-time decision-making and long-term performance analysis in autonomous driving.

OpenPodcar2 is a robust, ROS2-interfaced, low-cost, open source hardware and software, autonomous vehicle platform based on an off-the-shelf, hard-canopy, mobility scooter donor vehicle. It is a modification of the previous OpenPodcar design, which extends it with robust electronics and ROS2 interfacing, to enable both research and also potential deployment use cases. The platform consists of (a) hardware components: documented as a bill of materials and build instructions; (b) integration to the general purpose OSH R4 mechatronics board and a Gazebo simulation of the vehicle, both presenting a common ROS2 interface (c) higher-level ROS2 software implementations and configurations of standard robot autonomous planning and control, including the nav2 stack which performs SLAM and enacts commands to drive the vehicle from a current to a desired pose around obstacles. OpenPodcar2 can transport a human passenger or similar load at speeds up to 15km/h, for example for use as a last-mile autonomous taxi service or to transport delivery containers similarly around a city center. It is small and safe enough to be parked in a standard research lab robust enough for some deployment cases. Total build cost was around 7,000USD from new components, or 2,000USD with a used Donor Vehicle. OpenPodcar2 thus provides a research balance between real world utility, safety, cost and robustness.

This paper presents a trajectory planning method for articulated commercial vehicles, specifically tractor-semitrailers, based on Model Predictive Contouring Control (MPCC). Although MPCC has proven effective for passenger cars, it is generally ill-suited for tractor-semitrailers. These vehicles are significantly larger, the semitrailer follows a different path than the tractor, and reversing maneuvers are unstable and prone to jackknifing. Furthermore, practical driving scenarios often require scenario-dependent prioritization of different vehicle `anchor points', e.g., prioritizing the semitrailer position during docking or the tractor position when parking to charge. Therefore, we extend MPCC to enable scenario-dependent weighting of these anchor points and incorporate explicit road-boundary constraints for the front and rear tractor axles and the semitrailer axle, thereby ensuring that all considered wheels remain within the drivable area. The simulation results demonstrate the successful navigation of a representative logistic scenario in both forward and reverse direction. Furthermore, the influence of the optimization parameters on the trajectories is analyzed, providing insights into controlling the vehicle behavior. Finally, first tests using a full-scale prototype vehicle show the practical applicability of the approach.