Human-in-the-Loop AI

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

16 papers in the last four weeks, up 33% on the four weeks before. 0.2% of all new papers.

Jul 13Week of Sep 28

Latest papers 173

May 19, 2026cs.RO

RoHIL: Robust Human-in-the-Loop Robotic Reinforcement Learning Against Illumination Variations

Human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning systems achieve near-perfect success on the workstation where they are trained, but collapse when the same robot is moved to a workstation a few meters away due to shifts in the visual input distribution caused by new lamp positions and window light. Re-collecting demonstrations and re-running HIL on every workstation is incompatible with deployment, and naively fine-tuning on shifted-light data triggers catastrophic forgetting of the source workstation. To close this cross-domain gap, we present RoHIL, an offline fine-tuning framework that uses no extra real-robot interaction. RoHIL combines (i) a world-model-based image relighter that re-synthesises the visual stream of source-workstation trajectories under multiple virtual HDRI environments, leaving actions and rewards real; (ii) Illumination-Retention Replay (IRR), a data-level anti-forgetting mechanism that interleaves relit adaptation transitions with original-light retention transitions to preserve source-workstation Bellman coverage; and (iii) an anchored Bellman-actor regulariser that constrains representation and policy drift from the original source-workstation policy. Across four real-robot manipulation tasks under significant cross-workstation illumination variations, RoHIL substantially improves shifted-light performance where standard HIL-RL collapses, while preserving source-workstation performance, eliminating the need to re-collect data and retrain for every new workstation and environment. Project page: https://anonymous4365.github.io/RoHIL/

Shuoqin Zhang, Yixin Xiong, Xiru Gao +4

Chongqing University · Chengdu Anu Intelligence

Distribution Shift Robustness Robot Skill Learning Robotic RL Human-in-the-Loop AI Image Relighting Robust RL

May 16, 2026cs.AI

MADP: A Multi-Agent Pipeline for Sustainable Document Processing with Human-in-the-Loop

Document processing automation remains a critical challenge in enterprise environments, where traditional manual approaches are labor-intensive and error-prone. We present MADP, a multi-agent architecture that addresses the challenge of automating document processing in enterprise settings by combining deep learning-based classification and parsing with large language model extraction, while maintaining accuracy through selective human validation. Our system integrates five specialized agents--Classificator, Splitter, Parser, Extraction, and Validator--with a Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) mechanism and a novel Prompt Fine Tuning with Feedback Inheritance (PFTFI) approach. The operational analysis on a production use-case scenario of 100,000 invoices per year indicates a potential reduction of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) requirements by approximately 70%. Production deployment on 955 real-world documents processed through January 2026 achieves a 97.0% full-pipeline automation rate, with only 3% requiring non-AI fallback. Ablation evaluation on a stratified 100-document subset (5 documents per each of 20 supplier/document-type categories) demonstrates that the full MADP configuration with Human-in-the-Loop supervision attains 98.5% document-level accuracy. Additionally, we present a comprehensive sustainability analysis showing that our hybrid AI+HITL approach reduces CO2 emissions by 69%, energy consumption by 69%, and water usage by 63% compared to traditional manual processing. Benchmark comparisons of multiple LLM backends (Granite-Docling, Mistral-Small, DeepSeek-OCR) provide practical insights for deployment in production environments.

Diego Gosmar, Giovanni Zenezini

Tesisquare Head of AI, Turin, Italy · Polytechnic University of Turin, Department of Management and Production Engineering, Torino, Italy

Multi-Agent LLM Systems Document Information Extraction Human-in-the-Loop AI Workflow Automation

May 16, 2026cs.HC

ATRACT: A Trustworthy Robotic Autonomous system to support Casualty Triage

At a time when drones are increasingly associated with hostile operations, we re-purpose them for humanitarian and life-saving applications. However, adapting search and rescue drones for battlefield triage remains extremely challenging; the technology must perform reliably to support frontline medics who are forced to operate under extreme uncertainty, restricted access, and significant personal risk. Due to growing vulnerabilities of casualty evacuation in conflicting zones, this paper presents ATRACT (A Trustworthy Robotic Autonomous system to support Casualty Triage), a novel human-in-the-loop decision support system to enable early battlefield triage during the critical post-trauma period. ATRACT integrates drone-captured video with wearable sensor input for multi-modal learning to support casualty-state assessment, thereby addressing the limitations of existing systems. Drone video captures fine-grained behavioural cues, such as pose, posture, while body-worn sensors provide complementary physiological signals, including heart rate, breathing rate, and movement. By combining two modalities, ATRACT provides evidence to support the early judgement of medics when direct access to the casualty is delayed, risky, or restricted. To mitigate the data realism gap pertaining to injured actions, a conditional variational autoencoder is devised for data augmentation. Experimental results on our drone captured dataset show that proposed pipeline achieves 85.7% accuracy for action classification; while our lightweight CNN visual encoder remains competitive with stronger pre-trained video backbones. Overall, the results support ATRACT as a practically meaningful step towards remote triage in contested environments, where multi-modal sensing, human oversight and trustworthy decision support can improve casualty prioritisation, and lessen the exposure of frontline medics.

Tasweer Ahmad, Rafael Pina, Sandip Pradhan +6

Department of Computer Science, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, U.K. · Institute for Digital Technologies, Loughborough University London, 3 Lesney Avenue, London E20 3BS, U.K. · School of Architecture, Technology and Engineering, University of Brighton, U.K. +1

Human-in-the-Loop AI Video Action Recognition

May 15, 2026cs.SI

CitePrism: Human-in-the-Loop AI for Citation Auditing and Editorial Integrity

Editors and reviewers are expected to ensure that manuscripts cite relevant, accurate, current, and ethically appropriate literature, yet manuscript-level citation auditing remains largely manual, fragmented, and difficult to scale. Citation context, metadata quality, self-citation patterns, and bibliographic integrity all affect whether a reference appropriately supports a local claim. We present CitePrism, a transparent hybrid decision-support framework for editorial citation auditing that combines LLM-assisted contextual reasoning, embedding-based semantic similarity, metadata verification, integrity-oriented flags, and human-in-the-loop analyst review. CitePrism extracts citation neighborhoods, enriches reference metadata, computes fused relevance scores, surfaces metadata and self-citation review prompts, and supports configurable threshold-based triage. In a preliminary validation on a single case-study manuscript with 104 references from pavement engineering, agreement with human binary relevance labels reached Cohen's kappa = 0.429. At operating threshold tau = 17, CitePrism flagged all human-labeled irrelevant citations, while also producing false positives requiring analyst review. These results suggest that CitePrism may support conservative editorial screening and citation-quality triage, but they do not establish general editorial performance. CitePrism is intended as pilot-stage decision support, not as an autonomous misconduct detector or automated editorial decision system. Broader validation across manuscripts, domains, annotators, baselines, and deployment settings is required before operational use.

Gowrika Mahesh, Budanur Madappa Darshan Gowda, Kavana Gopladevarahalli Papegowda +4

Applied Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics, Department of Information, SRH University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Citation Verification Scholarly Peer Review Human-in-the-Loop AI

May 15, 2026cs.RO

OHP-RL: Online Human Preference as Guidance in Reinforcement Learning for Robot Manipulation

While reinforcement learning (RL) enables robots to acquire skills autonomously, its real-world deployment is severely limited by inefficient and unsafe exploration. Human-in-the-loop interventions offer a practical solution, yet existing methods typically exploit these interventions as auxiliary training signals, without fully capturing the richer information they provide about when and how autonomy should be guided. Human interventions often encode relative preferences over behavior under safety and task constraints, rather than prescribing exact actions to imitate. Motivated by this perspective, we propose Online Human Preference as Guidance in Reinforcement Learning (OHP-RL), a framework that leverages human interventions as preference information to guide policy learning. OHP-RL introduces a state-dependent preference gate that adaptively regulates when and to what extent human interventions should shape policy learning. This design enables the agent to benefit from intermittent and imperfect human feedback while preserving autonomous exploration and stable policy optimization. We evaluate OHP-RL on three challenging real-world contact-rich manipulation tasks on a Franka robot. Across all tasks, OHP-RL consistently achieves strong success rates, faster convergence, and substantially lower human intervention effort than prior approaches. Moreover, the learned policies exhibit more stable and human-aligned behavior throughout training.

Yunyang Mo, Jian Li, Qiwei Wu +2

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)

Robotic RL Human-in-the-Loop AI Robotic Manipulation Preference-Based RL

May 14, 2026cs.RO

Hand-in-the-Loop: Improving VLA Policies for Dexterous Manipulation via Seamless Hand-Arm Intervention

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are prone to compounding errors in dexterous manipulation, where high-dimensional action spaces and contact-rich dynamics amplify small policy deviations over long horizons. While Interactive Imitation Learning (IIL) can refine policies through human correction data, applying it to high-degree-of-freedom (DoF) robotic hands remains challenging due to a command mismatch between human teleoperation and policy execution at the intervention moment, which causes abrupt robot-hand configuration changes, or "gesture jumps". We present Hand-in-the-Loop (HandITL), a seamless human-in-the-loop intervention method that blends human corrective intent with autonomous policy execution to avoid gesture jumps during bimanual dexterous manipulation. Compared with taking over control using direct teleoperation, HandITL reduces intervention jitter by 99.8% and preserves robust post-intervention manipulation, reducing grasp failures by 87.5% and mean completion time by 19.1%. We validate HandITL on tasks requiring bimanual coordination, tool use, and fine-grained long-horizon manipulation. When used to collect correction data for policy refinement, HandITL yields policies that outperform those trained with standard teleoperation data by 19% on average across three long-horizon dexterous tasks.

Zhuohang Li, Liqun Huang, Wei Xu +5

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Shanghai Key Laboratory of Intelligent Robotics, Meta Robotics Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China · ByteDance Seed +1

Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation Bimanual Robotic Manipulation Human-in-the-Loop AI Imitation Learning Robotic Manipulation Interactive Imitation Learning+1

May 14, 2026cs.AI

TeachAnything: A Multimodal Crowdsourcing Platform for Training Embodied AI Agents in Symmetrical Reality

Symmetrical Reality (SR) is emerging as a future trend for human-agent coexistence, placing higher demands on agents to acquire human-like intelligence. It calls for richer and more diverse human guidance. We introduce a three-stage demonstration paradigm integrating multimodal demonstration signals. Building on this paradigm, we developed TeachAnything, a cloud-based, crowdsourcing-oriented demonstration platform with physics simulation capable of collecting diverse demonstration data across varied scenes, tasks, and embodiments. By unifying virtual and physical interactions through both methodological design and physics simulation, the system serves as a practical foundation for developing embodied agents aligned with Symmetrical Reality.

Zidong Liu, Rongkai Liu, Yue Li +1

State Key Laboratory of General Artificial Intelligence, BIGAI

Human-in-the-Loop AI Embodied AI Robot Learning

May 13, 2026cs.HC

Humanwashing -- It Should Leave You Feeling Dirty

The phrase 'human in the loop' is increasingly used to imply a sense of safety in relation to AI decision systems. It shouldn't. There are contexts where it can be applied appropriately, but these are not in the deployed decision systems we see dominating today. Human oversight of AI decision processes is one of the most popular proposals for addressing concerns, especially about bias, discrimination, misinformation, manipulation, accountability, and transparency. But there is insufficient examination of what human oversight actually means. The question raised in this paper is whether using the metaphor of a loop does anything to assist understanding of what is required and what is achieved in a particular decision context. Indiscriminate use of the loop metaphor obscures both processes and outcomes. It enables 'humanwashing', an activity analogous to 'greenwashing', where writers and commentators use language primarily aimed at putting systems in the best possible light.

Ben Wilson, Matimba Swana, Peter Winter +1

Computational Foundry, Swansea University, UK · University of Bristol, UK

AI Accountability Human-in-the-Loop AI Human Oversight of AI

May 13, 2026cs.AI

NIMO Controller: a self-driving laboratory orchestrator based on the Model Context Protocol

Self-driving laboratories (SDLs) are attracting increasing attention as a means of accelerating scientific discovery; however, developing SDL software remains technically demanding. To improve accessibility, orchestration software frameworks have been proposed to coordinate SDL components, but many existing frameworks are primarily designed for human interaction and lack standardized interfaces for direct integration with AI agents. In this work, we propose an SDL software architecture based on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), in which all SDL functionalities are exposed through MCP servers. Following this design principle, we introduce NIMO Controller, an MCP-based SDL orchestrator that integrates the experimental planning software NIMO. It provides a visual programming interface automatically generated through MCP-based tool discovery, allowing human users to design experimental workflows without writing code. The same MCP backend is also accessible to AI agents, providing a unified interface through which both human users and AI agents can interact with SDL components. AI agents can invoke MCP tools directly or generate NIMO workflows from natural language instructions. We evaluated the agentic workflow generation performance of various LLMs and conducted a user study using a color-matching SDL.

Naruki Yoshikawa, Ryo Tamura

National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan · Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan

LLM Agent Orchestration Human-in-the-Loop AI Laboratory Automation Autonomous Experimentation

May 12, 2026cs.SD

AuDirector: A Self-Reflective Closed-Loop Framework for Immersive Audio Storytelling

Despite advances in text and visual generation, creating coherent long-form audio narratives remains challenging. Existing frameworks often exhibit limitations such as mismatched character settings with voice performance, insufficient self-correction mechanisms, and limited human interactivity. To address these challenges, we propose AuDirector, a self-reflective closed-loop multi-agent framework. Specifically, it involves an Identity-Aware Pre-production mechanism that transforms narrative texts into character profiles and utterance-level emotional instructions to retrieve suitable voice candidates and guide expressive speech synthesis, thereby promoting context-aligned voice adaptation. To enhance quality, a Collaborative Synthesis and Correction module introduces a closed-loop self-correction mechanism to systematically audit and regenerate defective audio components. Furthermore, a Human-Guided Interactive Refinement module facilitates user control by interpreting natural language feedback to interactively refine the underlying scripts. Experiments demonstrate that AuDirector achieves superior performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines in structural coherence, emotional expressiveness, and acoustic fidelity. Audio samples can be found at https://anonymous-itsh.github.io/.

Yiming Ren, Xuenan Xu, Ziyang Zhang +3

Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory · Tsinghua University

TTS Synthesis Human-in-the-Loop AI Audio Generation

May 12, 2026cs.CY

An Explainable AI Assistant for Introductory Programming Education: Improving Feedback Reliability with Instructor-AI Collaboration

Active learning is widely recognized as an effective approach for improving learning outcomes in introductory programming courses. However, insufficient instructional support often limits students' access to timely, personalized feedback, which is crucial for mastering foundational programming concepts. Although recent advances in AI, particularly large language models, offer scalable opportunities for feedback, concerns about explainability and reliability remain. In this paper, we present an AI-driven classroom assistant that leverages an explainable AI model to analyze student code, map logical errors to instructor-identified misconceptions, and deliver instructor-authored feedback, thereby grounding reliability in instructor-defined pedagogical knowledge. To evaluate the effectiveness of our framework, we conducted an expert evaluation to examine its alignment with instructor-verified feedback and deployed the system in a classroom setting to assess students' perceptions of its usability. Results indicate that the assistant can provide accurate, instructor-verified feedback to students while fostering a positive experience.

Muntasir Hoq, Griffin Pitts, Bradford Mott +6

North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA · University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

Explainable Artificial Intelligence Programming Education Human-in-the-Loop AI

May 11, 2026cs.RO

UniSteer: Unified Noise Steering for Efficient Human-Guided VLA Adaptation

Diffusion-based vision-language-action (VLA) models have emerged as strong priors for robotic manipulation, yet adapting them to real-world distributions remains challenging. In particular, on-robot reinforcement learning (RL) is expensive and time-consuming, so effective adaptation depends on efficient policy improvement within a limited budget of real-world interactions. Noise-space RL lowers the cost by keeping the pretrained VLA fixed as a denoising generator while updating only a lightweight actor that predicts the noise. However, its performance is still limited due to inefficient autonomous exploration. Human corrective interventions can reduce this exploration burden, but they are naturally provided in action space, whereas noise-space finetuning requires supervision over noise variables. To address these challenges, we propose UniSteer, a Unified Noise Steering framework that combines human corrective guidance with noise-space RL through approximate action-to-noise inversion. Given a human corrective action, UniSteer inverts the frozen flow-matching decoder to recover a noise target, which provides supervised guidance for the same noise actor that is simultaneously optimized via reinforcement learning. Real-world experiments on diverse manipulation tasks show that UniSteer adapts more efficiently than strong noise-space RL and action-space human-in-the-loop baselines, improving the success rate from 20% to 90% in 66 minutes on average across four real-world adaptation tasks.

Junjie Lu, Xinyao Qin, Yuhua Jiang +6

University of Technology Sydney · Work conducted at Microsoft Research. · Tsinghua University +1

RL for Robotics Robot Policy Adaptation Reinforcement Learning VLM Adaptation Human-in-the-Loop AI Robotic Manipulation+1

May 7, 2026cs.HC

From Surface Learning to Deep Understanding: A Grounded AI Tutoring System for Moodle

This demo paper describes the development of the AI Teaching & Learning Assistant, a modular Moodle plugin that leverages Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to deliver high-quality, hallucination-free education. The system employs a dual-centric design, providing students with interactive, Socratic-based tutoring and educators with a "human-in-the-loop" workspace for supervised content generation. By grounding Large Language Model (LLM) responses in teacher-provided materials, the assistant addresses the risks of misinformation while encouraging deep conceptual mastery. Evaluation via the Ragas (LLM-as-a-Judge) framework and a preliminary user study confirms its effectiveness, achieving faithfulness scores up to 0.97 and a 4.00/5.00 recommendation rate.

Anna Ostrowska, Michał Kukla, Gabriela Majstrak +4

Faculty of Mathematics and Information Sciences, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

Intelligent Tutoring Systems AI in Education Generative AI in Education Human-in-the-Loop AI

May 7, 2026cs.HC

PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AI

Recent developments in AI safety research have called for red-teaming methods that effectively surface potential risks posed by generative AI models, with growing emphasis on how red-teamers' backgrounds and perspectives shape their strategies and the risks they uncover. While automated red-teaming approaches promise to complement human red-teaming through larger-scale exploration, existing automated approaches do not account for human identities and rarely incorporate human inputs. In this work, we explore persona-driven red-teaming to advance both automated red-teaming and human-AI collaboration. We first develop PersonaTeaming Workflow, which incorporates personas into the adversarial prompt generation process to explore a wider spectrum of adversarial strategies. Compared to RainbowPlus, a state-of-the-art automated red-teaming method, PersonaTeaming Workflow achieves higher attack success rates while maintaining prompt diversity. However, since automated personas only approximate real human perspectives, we further instantiate PersonaTeaming Workflow as PersonaTeaming Playground, a user-facing interface that enables red-teamers to author their own personas and collaborate with AI to mutate and refine prompts. In a user study with 11 industry practitioners, we found that PersonaTeaming Playground enabled diverse red-teaming strategies and outputs that practitioners perceived as useful, and that AI-generated suggestions in the PersonaTeaming Playground encouraged out-of-the-box thinking even when practitioners did not follow them strictly. Together, our work advances both automated and human-in-the-loop approaches to red-teaming, while shedding light on interaction patterns and design insights for supporting human-AI collaboration in generative AI red-teaming.

Wesley Hanwen Deng, Mingxi Yan, Sunnie S. Y. Kim +5

Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA · Apple Seattle, Washington, USA · Apple Cupertino, California, USA +1

Adversarial Prompt Generation LLM Red Teaming Human-in-the-Loop AI Automated Red Teaming Human-AI Collaboration

May 6, 2026cs.HC

AICoFe: Implementation and Deployment of an AI-Based Collaborative Feedback System for Higher Education

Effective peer feedback is essential for developing critical reflection in higher education, yet its impact is often limited by the inconsistent quality of student-generated comments. This paper presents the implementation and deployment of AICoFe (AI-based Collaborative Feedback), a system designed to bridge this gap through a human-centered AI approach. We describe a modular architecture that orchestrates a multi-LLM pipeline, utilizing GPT-4.1-mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and Llama 3.1, to synthesize quantitative rubric data and qualitative observations into coherent, actionable feedback. Key to the system is a "teacher-in-the-loop" mediation workflow, where educators use specialized Learning Analytics dashboards to curate and refine AI-generated drafts before delivery. Furthermore, we detail the underlying data infrastructure, which employs a hybrid SQL and MongoDB strategy to ensure traceability and manage semi-structured feedback versions.

Alvaro Becerra, Alejandra Palma, Ruth Cobos

GHIA Group, School of Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain

Generative AI in Education Human-in-the-Loop AI

May 5, 2026cs.DC

A Workflow-Oriented Framework for Asynchronous Human-AI Collaboration in Hybrid and Compute-Intensive HPC Environments

Human involvement is critical in training and deploying AI systems in high-stakes defence and security contexts. However, real-time interaction is impractical in HPC environments due to compute intensity and resource constraints. We present a workflow framework that enables asynchronous human-AI collaboration across hybrid infrastructures, including HPC clusters, local machines, and cloud platforms. Workflows can pause at defined checkpoints for human input without halting underlying compute jobs, preventing idle resources and enabling non-blocking supervision. The framework supports interaction with SLURM-based scheduling, containerized and native tasks, and is customized for scenarios requiring human judgment and adaptability. We demonstrate its application in model training on systems like MareNostrum 5, highlighting benefits in portability, efficiency, and oversight in operational AI workflows.

Sergio Mendoza, Cedric Bhihe, Natalia Zamora +5

1Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Spain · 2NTT DATA, Spain

High-Performance Computing Human-in-the-Loop AI Human Oversight of AI Human-AI Collaboration

May 4, 2026cs.AI

AIs and Humans with Agency

This paper compares agency in humans with potential agency in AI programs. Human agency takes many years to develop, as the frontal lobe is activated. Early attempts to endow LLMs agency have met serious obstacles. Progress requires a new architecture where actions and plans are formulated jointly with the human actors in each real world setting.

David Mumford

Human-in-the-Loop AI LLM Agents Human-AI Collaboration Agentic AI

May 4, 2026cs.AI

U-Define: Designing User Workflows for Hard and Soft Constraints in LLM-Based Planning

LLMs are increasingly used for end-user task planning, yet their black-box nature limits users' ability to ensure reliability and control. While recent systems incorporate verification techniques, it remains unclear how users can effectively apply such rigid constraints to represent intent or adapt to real-world variability. For example, prior work finds that hard-only constraints are too rigid, and numeric flexibility weights confuse users. We investigate how interaction workflows can better support users in applying constraints to guide LLM-generated plans, examining whether abstracting strictness into high-level types (i.e., hard and soft) paired with distinct verification mechanisms helps users more reliably express and align intent. We present U-Define, a system that lets users define constraints in natural language and categorize them as either hard rules that must not be violated or soft preferences that allow flexibility. U-Define verifies these types through complementary methods: formal model checking for hard constraints and LLM-as-judge evaluation for soft ones. Through a technical evaluation and user studies with general and expert participants, we find that user-defined constraint types improve perceived usefulness, performance, and satisfaction while maintaining usability. These findings provide insights for designing flexible yet reliable constraint-based workflows.

Christine P Lee, Xinyu Jessica Wang, Aws Albarghouthi +2

University of Wisconsin–Madison, USA · George Mason University, USA

LLM Planning Human-in-the-Loop AI

May 3, 2026cs.AI

Reliable AI Needs to Externalize Implicit Knowledge: A Human-AI Collaboration Perspective

This position paper argues that reliable AI requires infrastructure for human validation of implicit knowledge. AI learns from both explicit knowledge (papers, documentation, structured databases) and implicit knowledge (reasoning patterns, debugging processes, intermediate steps). Implicit knowledge remains unexternalized because documentation cost exceeds perceived value -- yet AI learns from it indiscriminately, acquiring both beneficial patterns and harmful biases. Current reliability methods can only verify explicit knowledge against sources, creating a fundamental gap: the most valuable AI capabilities (reasoning, judgment, intuition) are precisely those we cannot verify. We propose Knowledge Objects (KOs) -- structured artifacts that externalize implicit knowledge into forms humans can inspect, verify, and endorse. KOs transform verification economics: what was previously too costly to verify becomes feasible, enabling accumulated human validation to improve reliability over time.

Hengyu Liu, Tianyi Li, Zhihong Cui +5

Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark · Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway · School of Computing, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

AI Agent Reliability Human-in-the-Loop AI Human-AI Collaboration

May 2, 2026cs.AI

MILD: Mediator Agent System with Bidirectional Perception and Multi-Layered Alignment for Human-Vehicle Collaboration

Prior studies report that partial driving automation can increase the cognitive demands on human drivers. This effect largely arises from human drivers' lack of transparent insight into the vehicle's intentions and decision logic, as well as from automated systems' limited awareness of the driver's dynamic state and preferences. This bidirectional misalignment undermines shared situational awareness and exacerbates coordination failures in human-vehicle interaction. To address these limitations, we argue for a paradigm shift that elevates the human role from passive supervisor to active manager. We introduce the Mediator-in-the-Loop-Driving (MILD) system, based on an agentic system architecture to facilitate synergistic human-vehicle collaboration. MILD integrates a perception agent for joint in-cabin and out-of-cabin understanding with a lightweight strategy agent that generates compliant and explainable action suggestions. To ensure these strategies are strictly aligned with safety regulations and human values, we develop Evidence- and Constraint-weighted Policy Optimization (ECPO). ECPO leverages automatic validators to steer the agent toward behaviors that are not only accurate but also structurally complete, substantiated by evidence, and free from constraint violations. Furthermore, a retrieval-augmented generation module dynamically incorporates constraints from traffic regulations, speed recommendations, and driver preferences into the decision loop. Field experiments across three open datasets demonstrate that MILD consistently outperforms baselines in both perception accuracy and strategy quality under auditable offline metrics, and yields higher human-rated policy adequacy, comfort, and explanation than baselines. This work offers a practical pathway for building auditable and aligned agents for human-vehicle collaborative driving.

Jiyao Wang, Yunbiao Wang, Yubo Jiao +6

Department of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal H3A 0G4, Quebec, Canada · Systems Hub, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511453, Guangdong, China · Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, University of Luxembourg L-4365, Luxembourg

AI Alignment AI Agent Safety Human-in-the-Loop AI Autonomous Driving Planning

May 1, 2026cs.AI

Virtual Speech Therapist: A Clinician-in-the-Loop AI Speech Therapy Agent for Personalized and Supervised Therapy

This paper develops Virtual Speech Therapist (VST), an intelligent agent-based platform that streamlines stuttering assessment and delivers customized therapy planning through automated and adaptive AI-driven workflows. VST integrates state-of-the-art deep learning-based stuttering classification, and multi-agent large language model (LLM) reasoning to support evidence-based clinical decision-making. The VST begins with the acquisition and feature extraction of patient speech samples, followed by robust classification of stuttering types. Building on these outputs, VST initiates an agentic reasoning process in which specialized LLM agents autonomously generate, critique, and iteratively refine individualized therapy plans. A dedicated critic agent evaluates all generated therapy plans to ensure clinical safety, methodological soundness, and alignment with peer-reviewed evidence and established professional guidelines. The resulting output is a comprehensive, patient-specific therapy draft intended for clinician review. Incorporating clinician feedback, the system then produces a finalized therapy plan suitable for patient delivery, thereby maintaining a clinician-in-the-loop paradigm. Experimental evaluation by expert speech therapists confirms that VST consistently generates high-quality, evidence-based therapy recommendations. These findings demonstrate the system's potential to augment clinical workflows, reduce clinician burden, and improve therapeutic outcomes for individuals with speech impairments. An interactive user interface for the proposed system is available online at: https://vocametrix.com/ai/stuttering-therapy-planning-agent , facilitating real-time stuttering assessment and personalized therapy planning.

Shakeel Sheikh, Patrick Marmaroli, MD Sahidullah +4

1*The Kashmir Hub for Artficial Intelligence, The KHAIR, Basel, 4056, Switzerland. · 2Microsoft / Vocametrix, Tallinn, Estonia. · 3IAI, TCG CREST, West Bengal, India. +5

Speech Processing Human-in-the-Loop AI

May 1, 2026cs.HC

Sketch-to-Layout: A Human-Centric Computational Agent for Constraint-Aware Synthesis of Modular Photobioreactors

Building-integrated photobioreactors (PBRs) offer a pathway for carbon-neutral architecture, yet deployment is hindered by configuration complexity and biological maintenance. This paper presents a modular PBR facade system powered by a computational framework reconciling design intent with physical validity. We introduce 'carbon-neutralization bricks' featuring integrated vessel-and-conduit geometry; monolithic fluid channels enable 'plug-and-play' assembly. To navigate the combinatorial complexity of 14 modular geometries, we develop a Computational Sketch-to-Layout Agent that formulates layout synthesis as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). Using the CP-SAT engine, the agent treats sparse user sketches as soft priors while enforcing hard constraints like port alignment and global connectivity. This allows non-experts to synthesize fabrication-ready configurations in near real-time. Furthermore, to facilitate autonomous maintenance, we propose a weakly supervised algae health monitoring pipeline. By employing a hybrid CNN-attention backbone and a temporal ranking loss, the system quantifies biological vitality from photographs without absolute ground-truth labels. Experiments demonstrate the CSP solver achieves a 95.5% success rate on grid scales up to 15 x 15. Qualitative evaluations confirm the framework preserves design semantics while ensuring operational integrity. Long-term tests show the vision module produces health trajectories aligned with 14-day biological cycles, suggesting that integrating interactive synthesis with low-cost computer vision can democratize scalable carbon capture systems.

Xiujin Liu, Shuqi Li, Yuxin Lin

1Qrafty Technology Inc. · University of Michigan

Human-in-the-Loop AI

May 1, 2026cs.CR

Skills as Verifiable Artifacts: A Trust Schema and a Biconditional Correctness Criterion for Human-in-the-Loop Agent Runtimes

Agent skills - structured packages of instructions, scripts, and references that augment a large language model (LLM) without modifying the model itself - have moved from convenience to first-class deployment artifact. The runtime that loads them inherits the same problem package managers and operating systems have always faced: a piece of content claims a behavior; the runtime must decide whether to believe it. We argue this paper's central thesis up front: a skill is untrusted code until it is verified, and the runtime that loads it must enforce that default rather than infer trust from a signature, a clearance, or a registry of origin. Without skill verification, a human-in-the-loop (HITL) gate must fire on every irreversible call - which is operationally untenable and degrades into rubber-stamping at any non-trivial scale. With skill verification treated as a separate, gated process, HITL fires only for what is unverified, and the system becomes sustainable. We give a trust schema that includes an explicit verification level on every skill manifest; a capability gate whose HITL policy is a function of that verification level; a biconditional correctness criterion that any candidate verification procedure must satisfy on an adversarial-ensemble exercise; and a portable runtime profile with ten normative guidelines abstracted from a working open-source reference implementation. The contribution is harness- and model-agnostic; nothing here requires retraining, fine-tuning, or proprietary infrastructure.

Alfredo Metere

Enclawed, LLC, California, USA

AI Agent Security LLM Agent Verification Human-in-the-Loop AI Capability-Based Security

May 1, 2026cs.HC

Human-AI Coordination Zones: A Framework for Designing Human-in-the-Loop Experiences with Agentic AI

As generative and agentic AI becomes embedded in everyday products, practitioners face a persistent challenge: how to design human-AI coordination -- the ongoing mutual adjustment between users and AI systems as mediate through interfaces-that supports usability, trust, and safety. Existing resources offer high-level principles ("be transparent," "maintain user control") or low-level UI patterns, but there is a lack of mid-level design knowledge bridging the two. Through landscape and artifact analysis of 60 commercial AI applications, we introduce a framework defining human-AI coordination as the interplay of three dimensions: salience (how prominently AI is presented), involvement (what users can do to engage AI), and activity (what AI actually does). We contribute mid-level tools including coordination zones (done-for-me, done-under-me, done-with-me, done-without-me), an input taxonomy (prompted, sparked, inferred, layered), coordination curves for mapping user journeys, and design patterns demonstrating the generative capacity of the framework. The framework can be applied generatively to design experiences, analytically to evaluate existing ones, and communicatively to articulate ideas across stakeholders.

James Pierce, Vaiva Kalnikaitė, Siddharth Gupta +1

Amazon Web Services

Human-in-the-Loop AI Human-AI Interaction Human-AI Collaboration Agentic AI

Apr 30, 2026cs.LG

Human-in-the-Loop Meta Bayesian Optimization for Fusion Energy and Scientific Applications

Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) holds transformative promise for sustainable, near-limitless clean energy, yet remains constrained by prohibitively high costs and limited experimental opportunities. This paper presents Human-in-the-Loop Meta Bayesian Optimization (HL-MBO), a framework that integrates expert knowledge with few-shot, uncertainty-aware machine learning to accelerate discovery in data-scarce, high-stakes scientific domains. HL-MBO introduces a meta-learned surrogate model with an expert-informed acquisition function to recommend candidate experiments. To foster trust and enable informed decisions, HL-MBO also provides interpretable explanations of its suggestions. We show HL-MBO outperforms current BO methods on ICF energy yield optimization, as well as benchmarks in molecular optimization and critical temperature maximization for superconducting materials.

Ricardo Luna Gutierrez, Sahand Ghorbanpour, Ejaz Rahman +5

1Hewlett Packard Enterprise · University of Rochester

Meta-Learning Bayesian Optimization Human-in-the-Loop AI

Apr 27, 2026cs.CL

TSAssistant: A Human-in-the-Loop Agentic Framework for Automated Target Safety Assessment

Target Safety Assessment (TSA) requires systematic integration of genetic, transcriptomic, target homology, pharmacological, and clinical data to evaluate potential safety liabilities of therapeutic targets. This process is labor-intensive and expert-dependent, posing challenges in scalability and reproducibility. We present TSAssistant, a human-in-the-loop multi-agent framework that decomposes TSA report generation into a workflow of specialized subagents: Research Subagents that each ground and cite a single TSA domain, and Synthesis Subagents that integrate findings across domains. Subagents retrieve and synthesize evidence from curated biomedical sources through standardized tool interfaces and produce individually citable, evidence-grounded sections, with behavior shaped by a hierarchical instruction architecture that separates coordination logic from domain expertise and user intent. To complement these soft constraints, programmatic execution hooks and persistent memory stores enforce hard constraints across the workflow, while an interactive refinement loop allows experts to review and revise individual sections with full conversational context preserved across iterations. Rather than a single holistic comparison, we decompose report quality into reproducibility, evidential grounding, task-level accuracy, and controllability under expert oversight, finding high reproducibility and grounding, substantial agreement with the human reference, and net-positive expert-driven refinement.

Xiaochen Zheng, Zhiwen Jiang, David Tokar +5

Predictive Modelling, Roche, Basel, Switzerland · Computational Sciences Center of Excellence, Roche, Basel, Switzerland · Translational Safety, Roche, Basel, Switzerland

LLM Agent Orchestration Human-in-the-Loop AI Scientific Workflow Automation

Apr 26, 2026cs.CL

Learning Selective LLM Autonomy from Copilot Feedback in Enterprise Customer Support Workflows

We present a deployed system that automates end-to-end customer support workflows inside an enterprise Business Process Management (BPM) platform. The approach is scalable in production and reaches selective automation within two weeks for a new process, leveraging supervision already generated at scale: structured per-case UI interaction traces and low-overhead copilot feedback, where operators either accept a suggestion or provide a correction. A staged deployment pipeline trains a next UI action policy, learns a critic from copilot feedback to calibrate abstention, and executes only high-confidence steps in the background while deferring uncertain decisions to operators and resuming from the updated UI state. This setup lets one operator supervise multiple concurrent sessions and be interrupted only when the system is uncertain. The system operates on a schema-driven view of the BPM interface and includes monitoring and safe fallbacks for production. In production, it automated 45% of sessions and reduced average handling time by 39% without degrading support quality level.

Nikita Borovkov, Elisei Rykov, Olga Tsymboi +4

T-Tech

Selective Prediction Customer Support Automation Business Process Automation Human-in-the-Loop AI GUI Automation

Apr 25, 2026cs.LG

Revisable by Design: A Theory of Streaming LLM Agent Execution

Current LLM agents operate under an implicit but universal assumption: execution is a transaction -- the user submits a request, the agent works in isolation, and only upon completion does the dialogue resume. This forces users into a binary choice: wait for a potentially incorrect output, or interrupt and lose all progress. We reject this assumption and propose the stream paradigm, in which agent execution and user intervention are concurrent, interleaved processes sharing a bidirectional channel. We formalize this paradigm through a reversibility taxonomy that classifies every agent action as Idempotent, Reversible, Compensable, or Irreversible, and arrive at a core conclusion: an agent's flexibility is bounded by its reversibility. We prove that conflicting compensable actions impose unavoidable adaptation costs and that conflicting irreversible actions make full specification satisfaction impossible -- these costs are properties of the action space, not of the algorithm. Guided by this insight, we present the Revision Absorber, a reactive algorithm based on the Earliest-Conflict Rollback rule that is structurally optimal under mild assumptions. Experiments on StreamBench with real LLM agents validate all predictions: the Absorber matches the quality of a brute-force full-restart baseline while wasting an order of magnitude fewer steps of already-completed work, turning mid-execution revisions from a dead-end into a first-class interaction.

Zhiyuan Zhai, Ming Li, Xin Wang

Fudan University · Guangming Lab

Human-in-the-Loop AI LLM Agents

Apr 25, 2026cs.SE

AI-Assisted Code Review as a Scaffold for Code Quality and Self-Regulated Learning: An Experience Report

Code review is central to software engineering education but hard to scale in capstone projects due to tight deadlines, uneven peer feedback, and limited prior experience. We investigate an LLM-as-reviewer integrated directly into GitHub pull requests (human-in-the-loop) across two cohorts (more than 100 students, 2023--2024). Using a mixed-methods design -- GitHub data, reflective reports, and a targeted survey -- we examine engagement and responsiveness as behavioral indicators of self-regulated learning processes. Quantitatively, the 2024 cohort produced more iterative activity (1176 vs. 581 PRs), while technical issues observed in 2023 (227 failed AI attempts) dropped to zero after tool and instructional refinements. Despite different adoption levels (93% vs. 50% of teams using the tool), responsiveness was stable: 32% (2023) and 33% (2024) of successfully AI-reviewed PRs were followed by subsequent commits on the same PR. Qualitatively, students used the LLM's structured comments to focus reviews and discuss code quality, while guidance reduced over-reliance. We contribute: (i) an in-workflow design for an AI reviewer that scaffolds learning while mitigating cognitive offloading; (ii) a repeated cross sectional comparison across two cohorts in authentic settings; (iii) a mixed-methods analysis combining objective GitHub metrics with student self-reports; and (iv) evidence-based pedagogical recommendations for responsible, student-led AI-assisted review.

Eduardo Oliveira, Michael Fu, Patanamon Thongtanunam +2

The University of Melbourne Melbourne, Australia · University of Eastern Finland Joensuu, Finland

Generative AI in Education Human-in-the-Loop AI Automated Code Review AI-Assisted Software Development

Apr 24, 2026cs.AI

A Decoupled Human-in-the-Loop System for Controlled Autonomy in Agentic Workflows

AI agents are increasingly deployed to execute tasks and make decisions within agentic workflows, introducing new requirements for safe and controlled autonomy. Prior work has established the importance of human oversight for ensuring transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness in such systems. However, existing implementations of Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) mechanisms are typically embedded within application logic, limiting reuse, consistency, and scalability across multi-agent environments. This paper presents a decoupled HITL system architecture that treats human oversight as an independent system component within the agent operating environment. The proposed design separates human interaction management from application workflows through explicit interfaces and a structured execution model. In addition, a design framework is introduced to formalize HITL integration along four dimensions: intervention conditions, role resolution, interaction semantics, and communication channel. This framework enables selective and context-aware human involvement while maintaining system-level consistency. The approach supports alignment with emerging agent communication protocols, allowing HITL to be implemented as a protocol-level concern. By externalizing HITL and structuring its integration, the system provides a foundation for scalable governance and progressive autonomy in agentic workflows.

Edward Cheng, Jeshua Cheng

Agentic Workflows Human-in-the-Loop AI AI Agent Governance Human Oversight of AI