Medical Imaging

We propose a new probabilistic model for general-purpose medical image registration that builds upon the mutual information registration criterion. It centers around a spatial interpolation technique that assumes latent voxel-wise correspondences between the images being registered. By exploiting these latent variables, we derive dedicated optimization and MCMC sampling techniques that only involve closed-form iterative updates. When applied to nonlinear registration, an efficient demons-like optimization algorithm is obtained that shows robust out-of-the-box performance across a variety of monomodal and multimodal registration tasks. We also demonstrate a corresponding sampler that can quantify, for the first time, uncertainty in multimodal registration scenarios with very high-dimensional 3D deformations. Our code, which we call BINDER (Bayesian INference for DEformable Registration), is freely available at https://github.com/ste93ste/BINDER.

AI models for multimodal medical imaging must balance modality-specific specialization with cross-modal shared representations, a trade-off that pure Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures currently fail to satisfy. Expert-based routing improves in-domain learning but may sacrifice cross-modal signals, which appear particularly important for rare (low-prevalence) pathologies in our experiments. To resolve this, we introduce Generalist-Specialist-MoE (GS-MoE), a two-branch (MoE) architecture that couples a cross-modal generalist model with distinct modality-specific specialists (experts) via domain-constrained feature fusion. On RadImageNet (1.35M images, 165 pathologies, three modalities), GS-MoE recovers detection of six low-prevalence pathologies on which every baseline scores F1 $=$ 0, with per-class gains up to +0.60 F1. It attains this while even slightly exceeding dense and specialist-only MoE aggregate baselines (MCC 0.770), while using ${\sim}53\%$ fewer active parameters at inference than the strongest investigated dense model.

Annotating large radiology datasets is bottlenecked by the manual effort of delineating structures slice-by-slice in 3D volumes. Interactive methods reduce this effort but stay interaction-inefficient: slice-wise methods (including many foundation models) ignore inter-slice continuity, while 3D and video-based methods propagate a prompt with a \emph{fixed} propagator that never adapts to the target volume, so it drifts on low-contrast or pathological structures and must be re-prompted. We present IMVS, a human-in-the-loop annotation framework that composes three components into a closed loop rather than a new segmentation primitive: a lightweight 2D Slice Mask Adapter (SMA) fine-tuned online from user scribbles, a frozen Volume Mask Tracker (VMT) that propagates corrected masks across adjacent slices, and a soft teacher--student alignment that limits forgetting. The SMA is backbone-agnostic (UNet++, DeepLabV3, TransUNet). Across 8 public CT/MRI datasets, IMVS matches strong interactive baselines in quality while sharply cutting annotation effort: $14.4\times$ faster than a proficient copy-based manual workflow ($22.3\times$ over naive manual), $4.6\times$ over slice-wise and $1.9\times$ over 3D interactive methods. MedSAM2 and ScribblePrompt stay competitive or stronger on well-delineated organs; IMVS's advantage is largest on challenging targets and on interaction efficiency. Source code and Demo Video: https://github.com/AbhilakshSinghReen/imvs.

Medical imaging modalities such as ultrasound and X-ray are widely used in clinical practice, where diagnosis follows a structured, evidence-driven workflow aligned with standardized criteria. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show promise for automated medical report generation, most existing systems rely on end-to-end multimodal fusion without modeling clinically defined intermediate attributes, leading to limited grounding and interpretability. To address this issue, we propose CORAL (COncept-grounded ReAsoning with Localization), a multimodal framework that integrates spatial grounding and concept-level supervision into a unified reasoning process. CORAL employs a prompt-driven medical segmentation model to localize lesions and predicts multi-class clinical attributes through a Concept Bottleneck module. The resulting textual concept tokens are combined with mask-modulated visual features within an MLLM to enable structured report generation and diagnostic prediction. Experiments on BUS-CoT and IU X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in diagnostic accuracy, concept consistency, and report quality over strong general-purpose and medical MLLMs, indicating that concept-grounded reasoning better aligns generation with clinical decision processes.

Vision-Language Models such as CLIP enable effective few-shot medical anomaly detection (AD) via strong image-text semantic alignment. However, their globally contrastive pretraining lacks explicit spatial supervision, limiting precise lesion localization. In contrast, Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) such as DINO learn spatially coherent patch representations via self-distillation and local-to-global consistency, better capturing fine-grained anatomical structures. Leveraging this complementarity, we propose Spatial-FAD, a spatial-aware few-shot medical AD framework that improves lesion localization by combining VFM spatial priors with CLIP semantics. Specifically, we introduce a VFM-enhanced adapter that injects a structural affinity prior derived from DINO into CLIP features. This structure-guided refinement encourages visual embeddings to better adhere to lesion boundaries while maintaining semantic alignment. To address the loss of spatial detail from patchification and the limited input resolution of CLIP, we adopt a sliding-window aggregation strategy. This generates high-resolution, spatially dense embeddings to further enhance localization granularity. Moreover, we introduce a prototype-enhanced support memory scheme to efficiently exploit the few-shot support set. This module stores compact prototypes for normal and abnormal patterns, reducing memory costs while boosting performance by fusing patch-to-prototype and image-text similarities. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets, including Liver CT, Retinal OCT, and Brain MRI, demonstrate that Spatial-FAD significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, especially in lesion segmentation. Notably, in the 4-shot scenario, our method achieves an average improvement of over 11.4% in Dice score and 1.8% in AUC. Code is available at: https://github.com/JuzhengMiao/Spatial-FAD.

State Space Models (SSMs), particularly VMamba, have emerged as efficient alternatives for modeling long-range dependencies in medical image analysis. However, distinguishing subtle pathological features from visually similar anatomical backgrounds remains a significant challenge. Existing SSM architectures often learn entangled representations, lacking explicit mechanisms to separate disease-specific signals from normal anatomy. To address this limitation, we propose Spatial-Contextual Differential Mamba (SCDM), an asymmetric dual-branch architecture designed for selective representational disentanglement. SCDM introduces a Positive Branch for extracting discriminative features and a Negative Branch that actively models and suppresses normal anatomical context. This separation is achieved through a similarity-driven repulsion gate and a differential inference rule, which promote competitive feature learning without requiring additional branch labels or increasing model capacity. Evaluated on the RSNA Pneumonia dataset, SCDM achieves competitive classification performance (AUC of 0.858) while requiring significantly fewer parameters (29.4M) and FLOPs (1.44G) compared to standard VMamba and vision transformer baselines. Furthermore, activation analyses demonstrate that our differential mechanism yields highly precise localization, effectively isolating lesions by inhibiting irrelevant anatomical distractors.

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and its early diagnosis is crucial to improving patients prognosis and quality of life. However, the process of interpreting medical images for the detection of lung cancer is complex and requires trained experts. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) emerge as potential tools to automate and optimize image analysis. The objective of this work is to review the most recent and relevant applications of AI and DL in the field of radiology for the detection of lung cancer. To this end, an exhaustive search was carried out in scientific databases such as PubMed,IEEEXPLORE, Scopus and Web of Science, and 96 articles published from 2015 to the present addressing the use of AI and DL in biomedical engineering were selected. Emphasis is placed on the use of convolutional neural networks (CNN) with transfer learning and Data Augmentation as promising techniques to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the image interpretation process. The results show that the use of AI and DL can offer an effective alternative for the early diagnosis of lung cancer, with high sensitivity and specificity. However, current limitations and challenges that must be addressed to guarantee its responsible and safe application in clinical practice are also identified, such as the lack of standardized data, the ex plainability of the models, patient privacy, and the ethical and social implications. It is concluded that the use of AI and DL can have a positive impact on the care of patients with lung cancer, but further research and regulation are required to ensure its quality and reliability.

Simultaneous assessment of medical imaging and patient records is often required in clinical diagnosis. However, standard machine learning algorithms cannot analyze these data types together. Meanwhile, compliance with HIPAA and GDPR can constrain centralized aggregation of sensitive patient data. This leaves a crucial void of secure fusion of visual and textual context across distant networks. Thus, we present OmniMed-FL, a controlled systems study of multimodal federated learning for five-class clinical condition classification (Normal, Pneumonia, COVID-19, Pleural Effusion, Cardiomegaly). Our proxy corpus pairs 3,000 public chest radiographs with 3,000 class-conditioned synthetic notes, matched by class, not by patient. The framework benchmarks eight fusion strategies, three initializations, four missing-text imputation rules, and matched federated baselines under non-IID Dirichlet partitioning across 3 to 20 hospital clients. As all notes are synthetic and pairing is not patient-level, these are descriptive proxy comparisons, not estimates of diagnostic performance or deployment readiness. Within those limits with clients ($K=5$) and severe skew ($α=0.1$), local-only training achieves a macro-F1 score of 0.297, FedAvg achieves $0.662\pm0.074$, FedProx $0.737\pm0.085$, a matched FedMME-style one-shot ensemble $0.647\pm0.080$, and our SCAFFOLD-AdamW adaptation $0.070\pm0.015$, the 0.075 FedProx-FedAvg gap falling inside the wider of the two two-seed standard deviations. Over a $4\times3$ grid, label skew costs up to 0.27 F1 whereas a near-sevenfold client increase costs at most 0.10, while bidirectional volume grows linearly to 183.5 GiB at $K=20$. Multimodal fusion leads on both corpora, scoring 0.956 against 0.934 for text and 0.664 for images on the synthetic corpus and 0.906 against 0.880 and 0.737 on the radiograph corpus, for $2.3\times$ the model state of text alone.

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is crucial for safe deployment of medical AI systems, where domain shifts arise across institutions, acquisition protocols, and patient populations. VLMs enable zero-shot OOD detection by embedding images into a language-aligned latent space, where cross-modal similarity serves as a non-parametric confidence signal for identifying in-distribution samples. Yet existing methods rely almost exclusively on final-layer embeddings, implicitly assuming that the deepest representations are universally optimal. We first show that this assumption does not hold in medical imaging: intermediate layers provide complementary OOD signals, and the optimal representational depth depends on the respective image modality. While prior work selects layer combinations via entropy minimization of normalized histograms, we demonstrate that single-resolution entropy estimation is highly sensitive to binning choices, leading to performance variations of up to 19.3% AUROC. To address this instability, we propose a multi-resolution entropy estimation strategy that aggregates histogram statistics across multiple discretization scales, enabling robust and stable intermediate-layer selection. Across two medical OOD benchmarks, namely MIDOG and OASIS, covering distinct imaging modalities, diverse shift types, and different VLM backbones, our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, offering a lightweight and stable solution for zero-shot OOD detection.

Model pruning is widely used to compress deep neural networks, reducing memory and computational requirements with minimal impact on aggregate performance. However, its effect on model behavior remains poorly understood, particularly for long-tailed medical datasets where rare but clinically important conditions are underrepresented. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether pruned models preserve reliable explanations of their predictions. To address this gap, we present a systematic study of long-tail forgetting and explanation reliability under model pruning. Across two long-tailed medical imaging datasets, two CNN architectures, four pruning methods, and sparsity levels up to 95%, we evaluate predictive performance, explanation stability, and explanation faithfulness. Our results show that predictive performance exhibits a strong frequency-dependent trend, with lower-frequency classes generally experiencing earlier and larger degradation than higher-frequency classes. In contrast, explanation stability and faithfulness are influenced primarily by the pruning strategy, with gradient-informed methods preserving explanation reliability more effectively under aggressive compression. Qualitative and mechanistic analyses further indicate that explanation degradation is primarily associated with the collapse of class-discriminative gradients rather than the disappearance of feature activations. These findings suggest that model compression should be evaluated beyond aggregate performance. Incorporating class-aware and explanation-aware evaluation reveals failure modes that would otherwise remain hidden, while moderate sparsity levels provide a practical balance between compression, predictive performance, and explanation reliability.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities across diverse domains, showing considerable potential in medicine. However, their application in medical settings remains limited by the scarcity of visual question answering (VQA) datasets that capture clinical reasoning and explicit image-text alignment. Here, we leverage de-identified medical images and expert commentaries shared on clinician-oriented social media. By combining an advanced LLM with clinician-in-the-loop verification, we established a rigorous pipeline to construct ThoughtMed-1M, a long-form medical VQA dataset containing over one million VQA pairs and designed to capture structured clinical logic and medical image-text alignment. To demonstrate its utility, we developed a FOundational LLM Trained on ThoughtMed-1M (FOLTMed). FOLTMed achieved state-of-the-art performance across 42 medical VQA benchmark datasets, with a macro accuracy of 85.4%, and generated more clinically coherent responses on the ThoughtMed-1M test set. It outperformed state-of-the-art models by 3--5% across factuality and similarity metrics, highlighting a scalable paradigm for advancing research on clinically grounded multimodal LLMs.

Lesion segmentation in medical images plays a critical role in clinical diagnosis and treatment planning. Despite significant advances, lesion segmentation remains challenging due to two major factors: (1) complex background interference; (2) diverse lesion morphology. Existing encoder-decoder based methods mainly focus on enhancing feature extraction or redesigning decoding strategies. However, they lack early prior guidance and feature reconfiguration during the encoding stage, limiting their effectiveness in handling these challenges. To address these limitations, we propose FreNet, a feature reconfiguration framework with visual priors, which performs pixel-level reconfiguration before encoding and feature-level reconfiguration during encoding for precise medical lesion segmentation. To suppress background responses, we propose an Implicit Prior Neural Network (IPNN), which models a continuous spatial field and leverages visual prior from SAM to reconfigure input image before encoding stage. To better handle diverse lesion morphology, we design a Dual-domain Feature Reconfiguration (DFR) module to progressively reconfigure backbone features during encoding stage. Within DFR, the Frequency Decoupling Module (FDM) decouples backbone features in frequency domain to enhance foreground-background discriminability, while the Spatial Localization Module (SLM) spatially relocates and improving spatial stability after frequency decoupling. Extensive experiments on 9 medical image segmentation benchmarks across three imaging modalities demonstrate that FreNet significantly outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods. On the challenging ETIS dataset, our method achieves Dice improvements of 5.0% over SOTA method and 7.2% over SAM.

A benchmark score credits final answers, but not the route by which an item can be answered. In medical multimodal multiple-choice questions (MCQs), this distinction matters because a correct answer can be supported by the intended image finding or by benchmark-preserved cues in the wording of answers, non-visual clinical text, visible image text, artificial annotations, or device/context artifacts. We call the resulting score-level overinterpretation reasoning inflation. Here, a route is an observable input path that can support answer selection, not a claim about the model's hidden cognition. Across six medical multimodal MCQ datasets, we separate candidate cues from behavioral evidence through prompt- and image-side audits, modality ablations, and matched repairs that preserve the medical target and answer key. In a 13-configuration open-model panel, full-input accuracy is 62.63%, while text-only and options-only settings achieve 53.96% and 29.71%, respectively. Removing length-gap, absolute/conspicuous, and spatial/prepositional cues lowers accuracy by 6.58, 3.50, and 4.77 percentage points. We also construct MedQA-MM, a 1,000-item shortcut-mitigated subset, where text-only and options-only accuracy fall to 5.21% and 12.33%. This does not imply that models never use images; it shows that medical image-reasoning claims require route-level evidence.

Segmenting a new biomedical dataset usually means a domain-specific model trained on substantial annotation, or a foundation model steered at inference time. We present Exemplar, a few-shot segmenter that fuses a frozen DINOv3 backbone with a fixed bank of classical native-resolution filter responses in one lightweight head, fitted from the support masks alone. In the few-mask, native-resolution regime, classical priors and frozen self-supervised features are complementary: fused in one head, a single fixed configuration spans eleven biomedical imaging datasets. Under the same head, the classical bank alone reaches 0.693 on the eleven-dataset panel, scored by foreground intersection-over-union or centreline Dice, and the frozen features alone 0.672; the bank leads on seven of the eleven and the features on the rest, and fused they reach 0.782. Against five forward-pass few-shot methods, Exemplar leads in 54 of 55 method-dataset comparisons, 52 of them significant after Holm correction. From a single annotated mask it reaches 0.703 on the same panel, against 0.682 for a from-scratch nnU-Net trained on that same mask. At eight masks nnU-Net overtakes it on the panel mean, chiefly on centreline agreement, but takes 16-77x longer to fit.

Dense self-supervised learning (SSL) is a powerful paradigm for learning without annotations the local descriptors required to solve dense medical imaging tasks. We present Pix2Rep-v2, a framework for SSL of pixel- and voxel-level representations suitable for few-shot downstream applications. Pix2Rep-v2 addresses the main challenges of dense SSL by leveraging a redundancy reduction objective at the pixel-level with a principle of equivariance of dense representations, that scales efficiently to 3D or wide field-of-view applications. We evaluate our method on four datasets, across multiple tasks, multiple modalities and anatomical structures using multiple backbones in 2D and 3D, and under various data regimes. As an alternative to linear probing or full fine-tuning on the downstream task, we also propose an in-context variant, without downstream training, based on a dense prototype approach. Pix2Rep-v2 shows substantially higher data-efficiency in few-shot scenarios compared to fully supervised baselines, and is competitive with the state-of-the-art e.g., +9.3 Dice points in one-shot segmentation on the M&Ms-2 dataset. Our code and pre-trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/BioMedTP/pix2rep-v2.

Most advances in keypoint descriptions address monomodal settings, where image variations arise from viewpoint, illumination, or contrast changes. Multimodal scenarios involve images produced by fundamentally different sensing processes, such as multispectral imaging, RGB-depth, satellite imagery, or medical imaging, causing the same structures to appear differently. A common solution to cross-modal description is to train descriptors for each modality pair, which requires retraining whenever the modalities change, or to train large models, which incur a significant increase in runtime. Instead, we propose CrossFeat, a framework that enables an existing monomodal descriptor to operate across modalities. Our method learns a crossing function in descriptor space that maps features from one modality to a representation compatible with another. To preserve the structural information captured by the original descriptor, CrossFeat introduces a geometry-appearance disentanglement such that only appearance is altered while the geometric properties are preserved. Experiments across multiple domains and datasets demonstrate improved performance in multimodal matching.

Tool-using agents are being proposed for medical imaging, and their behaviour when a tool returns a false finding is largely unmeasured. We audit whether a ReAct-style tool-calling agent abandons an answer it has already given correctly once a falsified finding arrives, and whether that depends on how the finding is presented. On 20 VQA-RAD closed questions across four vendor-designated model tiers, the agent commits to an answer from the image alone; a negated finding is then delivered either as JSON from an analyze_image tool the agent invokes itself, or as quoted prose attributed to a radiologist. Our outcome is the commission-error rate over cases answered correctly without any tool. Deference is much higher under the prose-attributed claim: at the strongest tier the agent revised its correct answer in 10 of 13 cases against 1 of 13 under the tool (exact McNemar p=0.0039, Holm-adjusted 0.012). We do not claim this isolates the source label. Attribution travels with the delivery channel in our design, and exposure differs because the tool claim reaches the agent only when it calls the tool. The finding is a joint source-and-delivery asymmetry from a small-scale pilot whose pre-specified stopping rule was not met.

Visual Counterfactual Explanations (VCEs) aim to explain image classifiers by generating minimally edited and realistic versions of an input image that change the classifier's prediction. Existing VCE methods are inherently classifier-dependent and therefore susceptible to classifier biases and failure modes, such as sensitivity to shortcut features and calibration errors. In this paper, we propose a classifier-free approach for visual counterfactual generation based on Contrastive Analysis (CA). Given two datasets corresponding to different classes (e.g., healthy and patients), we disentangle the generative factors that are common across the two datasets from those that are salient to each dataset, and generate counterfactual images by swapping only the salient factors. By operating directly on data distributions rather than decision boundaries, our method provides model-agnostic VCEs that are less sensitive to classifier biases. Our approach leverages the high-quality synthesis and well-structured latent space of StyleGAN2. We use the feature space F, instead than the usual W-space, to improve detail preservation. Unlike conventional CA approaches, which typically assume salient factors in only one dataset, we introduce an adapted framework and loss functions for VCE that allow multiple salient factors in each dataset. We evaluate our method on three medical imaging datasets and demonstrate superior counterfactual generation quality compared to existing approaches.

Deploying unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) in clinical practice requires choosing which algorithm to use and which of its trained models to ship. However, the deployment (target) domain is unlabeled, so models cannot be evaluated directly on it, leaving it unclear which to select. We address this by evaluating the complete UDA pipeline, considering both adaptation and label-free selection together. Our study covers eleven clinically relevant cross-domain scenarios from nine medical imaging datasets, with ten UDA algorithms and 13 label-free selection methods (validators), evaluating over 80,000 trained models in total. By this, we find that a capable adapted model usually exists, but identifying it without target labels is difficult: the validator-selected models leave a large and structural target performance gap to the best available one, with no evaluated validator consistently reliable. Towards closing it, we explore two strategies, ensembling and a small target-labeling budget; both narrow this gap but do not close it entirely. Overall, deployable UDA depends on the complete pipeline; addressing the less explored selection step could bring much of current UDA closer to clinical use.

Multi-modal learning combining medical images and clinical text is promising for disease diagnosis. However, standard multi-modal training leads to shortcut learning: models exploit the easier modality (e.g., diagnostic cues in text) while neglecting harder-to-learn features (e.g., subtle visual patterns). We propose UniMod, a framework that mitigates shortcut learning by requiring each modality to predict the diagnosis on its own. It supervises image-only, text-only, and multi-modal classification simultaneously, so each modality must extract diagnostic features. We add cross-modality alignment for knowledge transfer and within-modality supervised contrastive alignment over same-diagnosis patients. On Harvard-Glaucoma, UniMod reaches 0.850 AUC, outperforming OGM-GE and Gradient Blending by 1.6-1.8%; on CheXpert Plus, it reaches 0.966 AUC, surpassing them by over 5%. UniMod also extends to 5-class multi-label diagnosis without architectural change, improving mean AUC by 0.097 over CGGM.

Vision foundation models are increasingly used as reusable encoders in medical image computing, yet their high-dimensional spatial embeddings are difficult to inspect beyond downstream task performance or global dimensionality reduction. We propose position-prompted PCA (P3CA), an encoder-agnostic method for local probing of channel-rich spatial tensors. Given a user-selected spatial prompt, P3CA estimates the feature normalization and dominant covariance directions within that region, then applies the resulting projection to the full tensor to visualize where locally informative directions are expressed. This produces a region-conditioned representation lens without modifying the encoder, retraining, or requiring task-specific labels. We implement P3CA in EmbedVision, an interactive 3D Slicer-based workflow, and evaluate it across natural images, colorectal pathology foundation-model embeddings, and spatial transcriptomic tensors. Across these settings, prompted projections reveal local structure suppressed by global PCA, improve prompt-matched pathology discrimination from frozen three-dimensional projections, and support comparison between learned and measured spatial representations.

Public chest X-ray repositories are widely used to train medical AI systems, yet their labels are typically extracted from radiology reports rather than verified directly on images. As a result, repository labels are often treated as image-level ground truth without validating whether they reflect what is actually visible in the radiograph. We introduce Repository Supervision Auditing (RSA), a framework that evaluates repository-derived labels against expert image-level annotations before model development. Using cardiomegaly in MIMIC-CXR as a case study, RSA compares repository labels with radiologist-reviewed image annotations, characterizes disagreement sources, and builds a curated cohort for deployment-oriented evaluation. Repository-derived cardiomegaly labels showed near-zero agreement with expert image-level assessment, identifying only 1% of expert-confirmed cases. Most discrepancies resulted from non-mention rather than explicit report negation, with expert-confirmed cardiomegaly identified in nearly half of studies assigned a repository-derived No Finding label. Using the resulting expert-curated cohort, a DenseNet121 model achieved a test ROC-AUC of 0.853. These findings show that repository labels may not reliably represent image-level truth and highlight supervision auditing as a critical step for developing trustworthy medical imaging AI.

Thoracic pathologies rarely occur in isolation, yet standard multi-label classifiers rely on shared global descriptors, discarding \emph{where} findings lie and \emph{how} they co-occur. We propose \textbf{C$\mathbf{^2}$A} (Co-occurrence Aware Class Attention), a classification head that explicitly couples spatial evidence with clinical priors. First, C$^2$A casts pooling as an expectation over learned per-class spatial attention maps, yielding localized descriptors for each disease. Second, it couples these descriptors via a learnable graph warm-started from empirical label co-occurrence. A single residual message-passing step shares evidence among related findings, proving to be a bounded perturbation of the identity where co-occurrence enters each logit through an explicit bilinear interaction. On CheXpert, C$^2$A achieves a superior $0.895$ macro-mean AUROC, outperforming advanced context-gating baselines. Crucially, gains concentrate on highly co-occurrent classes with ambiguous spatial evidence (rescuing Atelectasis by $+1.5$ over GCG), demonstrating the prior's regularizing effect with a negligible overhead of one linear projection and a $C\!\times\!C$ edge matrix.

Retinal fundus images frequently exhibit multiple co-occurring pathologies, yet standard deep learning classifiers apply static, identical computation to every image regardless of the underlying disease distribution. We propose a novel architecture that resolves this via sparse conditional computation, pairing a Guided Context Gating (GCG) spatial attention front-end with a sparsely-routed Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) block operating over feature tokens. Crucially, this routing yields an interpretable, data-driven decomposition. Expert allocation is significantly disease-dependent (p < 0.001), with the healthy Normal state and morphologically distinct pathologies (e.g., ERM, AMD) isolating to dedicated experts. On a five-class, patient-disjoint 5-fold cross-validation benchmark, our model achieves 0.912 +/- 0.008 macro AUC and 0.653 +/- 0.014 macro F1. Furthermore, Grad-CAM++ and post-MoE t-SNE visualizations confirm that expert routing aligns with localized lesions and geometrically maps co-occurring cases between their constituent clusters, positioning sparse MoE as an interpretable approach to multi-disease retinal screening.

In transfer learning, the choice of source model largely influences the performance on a target dataset. Still, selecting a fitting source remains a challenging task, especially in medical imaging where one has to decide between models pre-trained on off-the-shelf options, such as ImageNet, and domain specific datasets. Transferability estimation (TE) metrics address this problem by aiming to predict the best performing source model in a computationally cost effective way. However, previous work has reported conflicting TE metric performances due to differences in experimental setups. Moreover, most TE metrics are designed for and evaluated on natural images, while being optimized for accuracy, whereas in medical imaging metrics that are more robust to class imbalance are typically used. We study the impact of varying the target dataset as an isolated factor, by constructing miniature populations of different sample sizes and random seeds. In addition, we investigate the influence of the evaluation metric used to obtain the reference ranking. We find that small modifications to the target dataset change the rankings. Furthermore, we show that the choice of evaluation metric affects the reference rankings and therefore the evaluation of TE metrics. Overall, we observe a low agreement between rankings from TE metrics and reference. The code, model checkpoints and data splits used in this work are available through https://github.com/niclasclassen/robustness-of-transferability-estimation-metrics-for-medical-imaging.

Recent advances in machine learning have greatly improved breast cancer detection, enabling more accurate and timely diagnosis. Deep learning (DL) models show strong potential for medical image analysis; however, as their architectural complexity increases, their environmental impacts are becoming a growing concern. In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of seven DL models for breast cancer detection on two medical datasets: Breast Ultrasound and BreakHis 400X. The evaluated architectures range from Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and transformers to hybrid models. In addition to performance metrics, we assess CO2 emissions during both training and inference. Our results show that EfficientNet and ResNet consistently deliver strong performance, although with higher CO2 emissions. The selected transformers, such as DeiT-Tiny, perform competitively on both datasets, whereas DenseNet121 achieves lower accuracy. On the Breast Ultrasound Dataset, DeiT provides the most favourable balance between accuracy and energy consumption, whereas on the BreakHis dataset, the ViT and Swin models achieve the best results. Overall, our findings indicate that no single architecture category from the evaluated ones consistently dominates across the two selected datasets. Our results highlight the importance of jointly considering performance, emissions, and dataset characteristics when selecting models for medical applications.

Medical images are routinely de-identified---names, dates, and other metadata removed---and then shared for research, teaching, and public benchmarks under the assumption that this renders them anonymous. Such de-identification protects the metadata but not the pixels, and---apart from scans that directly contain facial structures---whether the image content itself identifies the patient has received little scrutiny. We investigate this question by learning a cycle-consistent correspondence between a cross-sectional medical image and a non-medical, patient-identifying image, using a pair of coupled, cycle-consistent variational autoencoders. From a held-out scan, the model recovers a recognisable likeness of the patient (identity-region MAE = 0.163); conversely, it synthesises a scan from such an image. These results indicate that a de-identified medical scan remains identifying---it is, in effect, a photograph of the patient---and that imaging data should be governed as biometric data rather than as anonymisable records. To support reproducibility, the code and trained models are shared at https://github.com/attilasimko/public-repository.

Deep learning models applied to medical image analysis suffer from severe catastrophic forgetting when continually adapting to new clinical tasks in dynamic environments. Mainstream incremental learning methods typically mitigate this by rehearsing raw historical images. However, this pixel-level rehearsal incurs significant storage overhead, raises privacy concerns, and fails to adequately capture the true data distribution with sparse exemplars. Inspired by human cognitive mechanisms, we propose a novel framework termed Semantic Text-Anchored Incremental Learning (STAIL) for sequential clinical tasks. To overcome the rehearsal bottleneck, STAIL introduces an asymmetric semantic consolidation buffer (SCB). By incorporating a minimal set of image anchors and extensive textual descriptions, the SCB enables dense semantic reconstruction of old tasks at a minimal storage cost. Furthermore, we design an LLM-derived Semantic Anchoring Mechanism (LSAM) that leverages the stable semantic space of frozen large language models as developmental priors. This mechanism explicitly anchors evolving visual features to textual representations, guiding and constraining plasticity and stability at both macroscopic and microscopic levels. Extensive experiments across three heterogeneous medical datasets, covering fundus, ultrasound, and X-ray imaging, demonstrate that STAIL acts as a highly effective plug-and-play module. It comprehensively enhances the performance of various existing baselines, achieving average gains of 2.24% in AAA-AUC for sustained performance and 3.55% in BWT-AUC for reduced forgetting. Code is available.

In-context learning (ICL) adapts medical image segmentation models to unseen structures and modalities without retraining by conditioning on a task-specific support set of image-mask exemplars. Because this support set is the model's only task-specific signal, its composition directly influences segmentation performance. In this work, we investigate the support set as a controllable determinant of ICL reliability. First, we compare random sampling against similarity-based selection, where exemplars are retrieved based on their visual similarity to the query image. Second, we train a transformer-based classifier to predict, from the query and support images alone, whether a segmentation will fall below a specified Intersection-over-Union (IoU) threshold. Using MultiverSeg with DINOv3 embeddings across four benchmarks and three imaging modalities, we show that similarity-based selection consistently matches or outperforms random sampling, with the largest gains at the smallest support set sizes. Furthermore, our classifier predicts segmentation failure above chance on all four benchmarks. Ultimately, these results demonstrate that the reliability of in-context segmentation can be both improved via informed support selection and anticipated before use, providing practical mechanisms for safer clinical deployment.

Real-time object detectors achieve remarkable accuracy under controlled conditions, yet degrade sharply on non-ideal inputs: fisheye distortion, game-renderedcharacters, aerial viewpoints, and 360°panoramas. We present YOLOv14, a detection framework with four adaptive mechanisms designed for specific types of inputvariation:(1) Deformable Area-Attention with windowed computation and shiftedwindows for geometric distortion;(2) Multi-level Game2Real Alignment with progressive adversarial training for domain shift;(3) View-Aware Contrastive Learning with adaptive temperature for viewpoint invariance; and (4) Scene-Adaptive Augmentation with dynamic loss balancing for scene diversity. Together, YOLOv14 achieves 49.1 mAP on COCO val2017 at 2.91 ms (T4 GPU), and delivers substantial gains on fisheye (+4.1 mAP), panorama (+6.6 mAP), drone (+6.4 mAP), andour synthesized game-character benchmark (+26.1 mAP). We release code and models to facilitate reproducible research.

Image mixup is a widely adopted data augmentation strategy, yet it is ill-suited for ordinal classification tasks such as medical disease grading, where labels encode a progression of severity. By indiscriminately blending disease-severity cues (ordinal) with appearance-level variation (non-ordinal), standard mixup produces samples that distort the very ordinal structure that underpins clinical severity grading. We introduce DisMix, an order-aware mixup framework for ordinal classification. DisMix disentangles ordinal and non-ordinal features via a dual-codebook VQ-VAE, allowing each subspace to be mixed independently: ordinal codes are interpolated to produce meaningful intermediate ranks, while non-ordinal codes are varied to introduce appearance diversity without corrupting the ordinal signal. Across four medical imaging datasets, DisMix shows the best aggregate performance among six image mixup baselines paired with six ordinal classifiers and remains effective under data scarcity and clinical grading variability.

Label noise is common in medical imaging datasets due to factors such as inter-rater variability, annotation errors, and ambiguous cases. This can severely undermine the reliability and clinical effectiveness of machine learning models trained using those datasets. To address this challenge, we introduce Lightweight Noise Correction (LiNC), which adds a single trainable trust parameter per training sample and learns when to use the observed label and when to defer to the model during a standard training loop. The key idea is to train using a convex combination of the observed label and the model's own predictive distribution, controlled by a per-sample trust parameter. We show that the gradient of this objective drives trust values in opposite directions for clean versus noisy samples in the early training phase, yielding separable trust distributions. We use a 3-component Gaussian Mixture Model over the trust values to separate them into clean, ambiguous, and noisy cases and then execute a short soft-correction phase on the noisy cases and a final hard correction phase. Experiments on ten 2D datasets from MedMNISTv2 under label noise of up to 50% show consistent gains in accuracy and strong mislabel detection. LiNC adds negligible asymptotic overhead: the training-time complexity remains dominated by the base network, with additional memory growing linearly with the size of the training set.

Active learning (AL) promises to reduce the cost of medical imaging projects by lowering the number of clinical labels required. However, practical deployment requires committing to a sampling strategy before the full annotation budget is spent, and choosing the wrong strategy can increase rather than decrease costs. We propose Active-Learning Deployment Advisor (ALDA), a deployment-oriented framework for AL method selection under clinical performance constraints. Given a short pilot phase, ALDA fits a parametric learning-curve model to each candidate strategy, estimates whether that strategy is expected to reach a required clinical performance target, and predicts the number of expert annotations needed to do so. In addition to absolute annotation cost, ALDA introduces a deployment window that quantifies the sensitivity of this cost estimate to uncertainty in the clinical threshold. The final recommendation follows a risk-aware rule: among strategies with near-optimal predicted cost, ALDA prefers the strategy with the narrowest deployment window, the most robust to threshold revisions. Experiments on four medical imaging classification domains show that ALDA predicts the deployment-optimal method from a pilot of 15-30% of the intended budget and reduces annotation costs by up to 82% compared with a poor strategy choice. Rather than introducing a new sampling heuristic, ALDA provides a practical decision layer that answers a deployment-critical question: how many labels are enough?

Medical visual grounding connects free-form clinical queries to spatial evidence in medical images and is an important component of interpretable medical artificial intelligence. However, general-purpose grounding models are predominantly trained on natural images, while existing medical localization resources remain fragmented across imaging modalities, datasets, and task formulations. To address this gap, we construct LocAnyMed-200K, a multimodal medical visual grounding dataset containing approximately 200K image-query-answer examples across computed tomography, optical medical imaging, ultrasound, and X-ray. We harmonize heterogeneous detection and localization resources into a unified free-form instruction format that supports one or multiple bounding boxes, point coordinates, and no-target outputs for negative queries. Full-parameter fine-tuning of LocateAnything-3B on LocAnyMed-200K improves F1@IoU 0.50 from 10.64 to 85.59 on a held-out evaluation split, demonstrating that large-scale domain-specific supervision can equip a general grounding model with effective medical localization capabilities. Beyond spatial coordinates, a clinically interpretable grounding system should also communicate the evidence supporting its prediction. We therefore derive LocAnyMed-CoT-20K, a rationale-augmented subset that connects anatomical context, visual observations, and spatial conclusions through structured reasoning and further improves cross-source generalization through fine-tuning. Together, these resources provide a unified foundation for studying both localization accuracy and rationale quality across heterogeneous medical imaging modalities. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/MiliLab/LocAnyMed.

Medical image classification often suffers from class imbalance due to the inherent disparities in disease incidence. Existing approaches, such as class resampling and loss reweighting, mainly improve learning within the observed feature distribution, but do not explicitly enlarge the latent support region of tail classes. As a result, tail-class representations remain overly compact and are easily encroached upon by head classes, leading to biased decision boundaries. In this work, we propose Recurrent Contrastive Learning (RCL) for imbalanced medical image classification. RCL progressively expands the support region of tail classes by recurrently reusing historical feature states across training phases. Specifically, we adopt DINOv3 with LoRA adapters as the backbone to provide robust feature embeddings. We then devise a Temporal Memory Queue (TMQ) to preserve corpus-level features across training phases and provide diversified global references for contrastive learning. Based on TMQ, we construct Temporal Anchors (TARs) to form an anchor field around tail classes. This field enlarges the support region of tail classes, suppresses head-class encroachment, and improves inter-class separation. Extensive experiments on three imbalanced medical datasets demonstrate that RCL achieves consistent improvements over strong baselines. The code is available at https://github.com/dndins/RCL.

Vision-language models (VLMs), including medical specialists, are increasingly proposed for medical imaging, yet their stated confidence is rarely evaluated separately from correctness. We use brain MRI as a controlled, high-stakes testbed for a broader failure mode in frontier multimodal systems: models can appear competent while lacking reliable self-knowledge. We present an automatically graded behavioral audit and pilot study of six instruction-tuned VLMs (five general-purpose and one medical specialist) on 4,102 images (4,032 axial/coronal/sagittal MRI slices from 250 subjects plus 70 non-brain/noise controls), with labels derived from public metadata and released expert segmentation masks rather than new human annotation. Across models, answer coverage is near-complete, but verbalized-confidence calibration is poor: ECE ranges from 0.27 to 0.40, mean confidence on incorrect answers ranges from 0.82 to 0.97, and 33-46% of answered items are high-confidence errors. The most accurate model is also the most confident on its errors, while a base/specialist family contrast suggests that medical adaptation improves tumor-presence detection without improving confidence reliability. Open-ended diagnostics further show that hallucination and abstention vary separately from multiple-choice accuracy. These findings argue that medical-image VLM evaluation should report verbalized-confidence reliability, confident error, hallucination, and abstention alongside accuracy.

Deformable image registration (DIR) is a core problem in medical image analysis; but, unlike labeling decision problems such as classification and segmentation, registration is a problem class that involves stringent physical constraints. Although deep learning methods have made faster registration possible, the resulting models are often difficult to interpret compared to hand-crafted methods with explicit objectives and interpretable physical meaning. In this work, we show that an analytical method can still yield competitive and superior results to deep learning in a common deformable registration task. We study pTVreg as a parametric total variation based registration in that context. Observing its different implementations to perform at various degrees, we introduce here an accessible implementation of this method, together with a Bayesian optimization framework that automatically sets self-parameters for any DIR task from a set of sample examples. Experiments on Lung250M-4B show that our proposed implementation achieves state-of-the-art results in this benchmark, substantially superior to existing deep learning solutions and other pTVreg variants as baselines. The source code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/oazeybekoglu/ptvreg-python .

Deep learning models for medical image analysis typically apply a fixed amount of computation to every input, regardless of case difficulty. Anatomy-guided dual-stream architectures have been shown to improve diagnostic performance, but they evaluate both streams unconditionally, even on cases a single stream could already resolve confidently. We propose SecondOpinion, a framework in which a fast primary stream processes every case, while a second, anatomy-guided stream is invoked only when GateKeeper, a gating mechanism trained explicitly as a binary correctness classifier, judges that the primary stream's prediction needs additional scrutiny, much as a clinician might seek a second opinion on a difficult case. When activated, the two streams are combined through a lightweight cross-attention fusion module. We evaluate SecondOpinion on a unified five-class chest X-ray dataset and a pelvic fracture dataset, the latter including a held-out, harder subset of fractures that are invisible on X-ray but confirmed via CT. SecondOpinion matches or exceeds prior state-of-the-art performance on both tasks, while activating its anatomy-guided stream on only 9.23% of chest X-ray cases, rising to 24.12% on visible fractures and 45.71% on invisible fractures, an activation rate that tracks task difficulty directly. These results suggest that supervising a gating signal toward correctness, rather than relying on unsupervised confidence, allows a model to allocate anatomical reasoning where it is actually needed.

In recent years, generative AI has attracted significant public attention, and its use has been rapidly expanding across a wide range of domains. From creative tasks such as text summarization, idea generation, and source code generation, to the streamlining of medical support tasks like diagnostic report generation and summarization, AI is now deeply involved in many areas. Today's breadth of AI applications is clearly distinct from what was seen before generative AI gained widespread recognition. Representative generative AI services include DALL-E 3 (OpenAI, California, USA) and Stable Diffusion (Stability AI, London, England, UK) for image generation, ChatGPT (OpenAI, California, USA), and Gemini (Google, California, USA) for text generation. The rise of generative AI has been influenced by advances in deep learning models and the scaling up of data, models, and computational resources based on the scaling laws. Moreover, the emergence of foundation models, which are trained on large-scale datasets and possess general-purpose knowledge applicable to various downstream tasks, is creating a new paradigm in AI development. These shifts brought about by generative AI and foundation models also profoundly impact medical image processing, fundamentally changing the framework for AI development in healthcare. This paper provides an overview of diffusion models used in image generation AI and large language models (LLMs) used in text generation AI, and introduces their applications in medical support. This paper also discusses foundation models, which are gaining attention alongside generative AI, including their construction methods and applications in the medical field. Finally, the paper explores how to develop foundation models and high-performance AI for medical support by fully utilizing national data and computational resources.

Federated learning enables medical-imaging models to be trained across hospitals, and privacy law, most explicitly the GDPR ``right to be forgotten'', turns removing a hospital's, a class's, or a patient's influence from such a model into a federated unlearning problem. This need is most acute in medicine, where patients withdraw consent and hospitals leave collaborations. Yet nearly all unlearning evidence comes from natural images, whose heterogeneity and task structure differ sharply from clinical data, so it is unclear whether existing methods transfer, and no shared protocol covers clinical data. We present Lethe, a benchmark for federated unlearning in medical imaging. It evaluates twelve methods across eight task families, from classification and segmentation to denoising, cross-modality synthesis, and vision-language question answering, at three forgetting granularities and against a retrained gold standard on utility, privacy, and cost. The central result is that what separates methods is the difficulty of the forgetting request, not the method itself. The easy removals that dominate the literature leave the methods that preserve utility indistinguishable, while only hard ones separate them. More striking, on the many medical tasks that generalize across sites, forgetting a client barely changes task performance, leaving residual membership as the signal that must be erased.

Medical anomaly detection identifies abnormal images and localizes lesions under scarce supervision while generalizing across organs and modalities. Existing CLIP-based methods reduce annotation requirements through vision--language alignment, but their normal and abnormal references, whether text prompts or learned visual tokens, remain fixed across test images. Such static references may not transfer reliably to unseen targets in a cross-domain medical imaging scenario. To address this, we propose ReCAP, a language-free framework that replaces static anchors with input-conditioned visual prototypes. ReCAP re-centers separated normal and abnormal prototypes for each image through a bounded gated modulation, enabling query-adaptive anomaly scoring while constraining context-induced prototype drift. For the few-shot setting, we introduce a non-parametric normal-reference memory to preserve instance-level target-domain variation and complement the conditional prototype branch. Across six medical benchmarks, ReCAP achieves the best image-level AUROC on all zero-shot and 23 of 24 few-shot settings, and the best zero-shot pixel-level AUROC on all three segmentation datasets. Particularly, it reduces inference latency by over 70% compared to the fastest baseline, without text prompts or test-time gradient updates.

Adapting deep learning models to profound clinical heterogeneity typically relies on parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) to avoid the severe overfitting associated with full end-to-end network updates. Although PEFT successfully navigates limited data scenarios, it inherently forces the training of a separate, isolated adapter for every specific diagnostic task. Consolidating these isolated adapters into a single generalist network risks negative transfer, as optimization gradients from conflicting visual domains interfere. To address this, we propose MoPET, a mixture-of-experts (MoE) method that uses a learned sparse router to direct each input through a small subset of low-rank PEFT experts injected into a frozen foundation model, sharing capacity across datasets while limiting cross-domain gradient conflict. Through selected evaluations on the MedMNIST benchmark, we first establish that PEFT outperforms full network updates, improving average accuracy from 86.50% to 88.97%. We then show that a single MoPET model consolidates four heterogeneous datasets into one network, improving average accuracy over the best isolated PEFT adapters (93.46% versus 92.83%). Finally, we show that co-training with auxiliary datasets improves accuracy on data-constrained clinical targets, raising average target accuracy over the strongest isolated adapter from 81.58% to 83.58%. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/sdoerrich97/mopet.

Data augmentations define the invariances learned by self-supervised learning (SSL). Standard augmentation pipelines were designed for natural images, yet scientific imaging modalities are governed by physical measurement processes with distinct symmetry and acquisition constraints. Enforcing invariances that contradict these constraints can distort learned representations and limit downstream performance, but practitioners moving from machine learning into a new scientific modality currently have little guidance beyond transferring natural-image pipelines unexamined. We address this gap with a principled, reproducible procedure for augmentation design in scientific SSL: we formalise the physics-aligned augmentation set as a union of measurement-consistent symmetries and acquisition-driven perturbations, and we give a concrete, largely label-free workflow---enumerate candidates, label each by the measurement operator, validate with representation-geometry diagnostics, and confirm by single-factor ablation---for selecting them. We instantiate the procedure for real-space electron microscopy and reciprocal-space 4D-STEM diffraction, and evaluate it across five SSL paradigms (DINOv2, SimCLR, MAE, VICRegL, I-JEPA) on classification and crystal-orientation regression. Physics-aligned augmentations substantially improve downstream performance for objectives relying on cross-view consistency, reduce geodesic error and improve robustness under realistic acquisition variability (detector gain, resolution loss), and systematically reshape representation geometry. While our experiments use electron microscopy, the procedure is modality-agnostic and applies to other measurement-driven domains such as medical and remote-sensing imaging. These results position augmentation design as a primary, and controllable, source of inductive bias in scientific self-supervised learning.

Classifying pathological scars from clinical photographs requires distinguishing keloids from hypertrophic scars despite limited expert-labeled data and substantial acquisition variation across hospitals. End-to-end image models remain data-dependent, whereas sending photographs to a hosted vision-language model (VLM) may conflict with local data-governance requirements and yields decisions that are difficult to reproduce and audit. We introduce ScaFE (Scar Feature Engineering), which transfers clinical knowledge from a large language model (LLM) into deterministic, executable feature programs instead of asking the model to diagnose images. A web-enabled LLM retrieves clinical evidence and synthesizes programs that measure visually assessable scar attributes. Candidate programs execute in a restricted local environment, and only aggregate validation statistics and feature-level SHAP summaries are returned for iterative repair and refinement; raw images and patient-level outputs remain local. A lightweight Random Forest then operates on the resulting structured representation. On 600 photographs from three hospitals under leave-one-site-out evaluation, ScaFE achieves 81.0% site-macro balanced accuracy, exceeding the strongest baseline, BiomedCLIP, by 10.0 percentage points. With only 10% of the development data, ScaFE retains 72.0% balanced accuracy and an 11.8-point lead. Iterative refinement also raises the executable-program rate from 66.7% to 95.0%, with verified evidence for 91.7% of the final features. These results show that LLM knowledge can support data-efficient, cross-site medical image classification through local and auditable feature programs rather than direct VLM decisions.

Deep learning has shown promise for automated tongue diagnosis in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), yet the design space remains underexplored. We conducted a systematic ablation study spanning 20+ model versions under rigorous 5-fold cross-validation on TongueDx2 (5,109 images, 976 expert-annotated) and a merged dataset of 11,101 samples. We compared six backbone architectures, four loss functions, five augmentation strategies, and six training strategies. The best 976-sample model achieved weighted-F1 of 0.6625 using ConvNeXt-Tiny with restrained augmentation and weak-group ensemble, while the best 11,101-sample model reached weighted-F1 of 0.7761. Six key design principles emerged: (1) ConvNeXt-Tiny offers optimal parameter efficiency; (2) BCE substantially outperforms Asymmetric Loss (+2.7%); (3) restrained color augmentation is critical; (4) weak-group ensemble replacement (+2.1%) outperforms probability averaging; (5) data scaling yielded +20.6% improvement; (6) expanding from 13 to 45 label dimensions caused catastrophic collapse (0.78 to 0.22). These principles are generalizable to multi-label medical image classification with class imbalance.

Numerous unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) algori-thms exist, but for clinical practice, selecting the best-suited one along with proper hyperparameters often remains unclear, as the unlabeled deployment (target) domain prevents direct evaluation. We propose a label-free criterion that jointly selects the algorithm and hyperparameters for UDA. Given a pool of candidate models from multiple algorithms trained with different hyperparameters, our approach scores each candidate against an agreement reference, and selects the one with the highest score. The agreement reference is constructed in two levels without using target labels. First, we leverage multiple label-free selection signals, using each to nominate a model within every algorithm. Second, the nominated models are aggregated across algorithms to form a reference prediction for each unlabeled target sample. The candidate whose predictions agree most with this reference is then selected for deployment. Experimental results on four brain MRI and four chest X-ray datasets across seven clinically relevant transfer scenarios show that our method achieves better selection performance than other methods and remains effective across different algorithm pools. Our approach takes a step towards practical, label-free algorithm selection for clinical deployment of UDA.

We describe the DS@GT submissions to the ImageCLEFmedical Caption 2026 challenge, which continues a long-running benchmark on the ROCOv2 dataset with two tracks: Concept Detection (Task 1), assigning UMLS Concept Unique Identifiers (CUIs) to radiology images, and Caption Prediction (Task 2), generating natural-language captions. For Task 1, our primary submission was a three-way late-fusion ensemble of ConvNeXt-V2, BiomedCLIP ViT-B/16, and DenseNet-169 with a regularized ''Honest Threshold Tuning'' procedure designed to avoid validation overfitting on rare concepts; this submission ranked first on the official submission with a primary $F_1$ of $0.5790$ and a secondary $F_1$ of $0.9657$. In parallel, we submitted a training-free KNN retrieval pipeline over frozen BiomedCLIP embeddings, which reached a primary $F_1$ of $0.5780$ and a secondary $F_1$ of $0.9599$-essentially matching the fine-tuned ensemble on the primary track at a fraction of the cost. For Task 2, our submissions included a fine-tuned Gemma-3 27B model (overall $0.3571$, ranking third in the official submission), a fully fine-tuned BLIP pipeline with custom Vizwins merging ($0.3564$), and a zero-shot MedGemma-4B run with a PubMed-style prompt ($0.3186$), spanning a wide range of model scales and training costs. Code: https://github.com/dsgt-arc/imageclef-caption-2026.

Deep learning has shown strong potential in medical image analysis, but most existing methods rely on large-scale annotations and a closed-world assumption that rarely holds in clinical practice. Although Generalized Category Discovery (GCD) has advanced rapidly on natural images, it remains underexplored in medical imaging. To address this issue, we propose MedXplore, a unified framework for reliable and unbiased medical GCD, optimizing from both perceptual and decision levels. Specifically, at the perceptual level, taking a frequency domain perspective, Frequency-SNR Adaptive Attention and Consistency (FAAC) performs learnable full-spectrum filtering and global-local energy contrast activation to not only highlight local abnormal signals relative to the global context, but also provide reliable semantic anchors for patch consistency learning. At the decision level, Adaptive Cosine-Angular Margin (ACAM) adjusts angular margins using semantic difficulty and feature confidence to balance intra-class compactness and inter-class separability. Together, the two modules improve lesion-sensitive representation learning and mitigate old-class bias. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show an average \textbf{8.5%} gain in \textit{All} accuracy over the strongest competing methods. On Kvasir, MedXplore reduces false-old errors from 14.50% to 0.80%, demonstrating strong robustness under severe old-new ambiguity.

Medical imaging has served as primary proving ground for clinical artificial intelligence (AI), yet a decade of intense research has not translated into proportionate bedside impact. We argue that this gap is not primarily a product of insufficient algorithmic performance, inadequate regulation, or limited explainability. Rather, it reflects a structural misalignment, between how AI systems are designed and evaluated, and how clinical decisions are made. This Perspective identifies six interconnected dimensions of this misalignment: the dominance of pixel-only models in a multimodal clinical world; the erosion of physician trust through opaque and inflexible systems; the unfulfilled promise of foundation models in data-sparse medical domains; the persistent bottleneck of non-shareable, under-curated datasets; the gap between validated algorithms and deployable clinical platforms; and the failure of prediction-centric AI to generate actionable clinical guidance. For each dimension, we reframe the problem and propose a path forward, culminating in a vision of agentic, physician-aligned AI that extends, rather than replaces, clinical judgment.

Cross-modal knowledge distillation can transfer diagnostic knowledge from a strong but costly teacher modality to a cheaper and more deployable student modality. In medical image analysis, however, the two modalities are often unpaired: they are collected from different patient cohorts and occupy geometrically incompatible feature spaces. This makes instance-level distillation invalid and direct feature matching unreliable. To address these challenges, we propose Shared Semantic Codebook Distillation (SSCD), which compares teacher and student representations through a shared discrete codebook. Each image is represented as a distribution over a common, modality-agnostic vocabulary, and knowledge is transferred by aligning these distributions across modalities, both globally and class-conditionally, without requiring paired samples or directly comparable raw features. The codebook is evolved online by exponential moving average and kept diverse through entropy regularization and dead-code restart. At inference, all teacher-side and codebook modules are discarded, leaving only the student encoder and classifier. On two heterogeneous unpaired settings, OCT-to-fundus retinal disease classification and CT-to-chest-X-ray pneumonia classification, SSCD improves the student from 64.5 to 70.2 macro-F1 and from 73.8 to 76.3 macro-F1, respectively, outperforming all evaluated distillation baselines on both settings. Code and pretrained models are available at https://github.com/DillanImans/SSCD-unpaired-distillation

When asked to describe a medical image that was never attached, frontier vision-language models do not abstain: they confabulate a diagnosis. We show that this confabulation is not random. It is structured by who the patient is said to be. Across chest X-ray, brain MRI, and dermatology, Claude Opus-4.7, GPT-5.4, and Gemini-3.1-Pro are each queried with only a demographic descriptor and no image, and changing the descriptor systematically shifts the diagnosis returned. Claude concentrates sharply: a 65-year-old white man asking about a skin mole receives Melanoma in nearly every response, and a 32-year-old Black woman asking about her chest X-ray receives a Sarcoidosis diagnosis whose reasoning reads "suspected, based on demographics and classic pattern.'' GPT-5.4's effect is broader, fabricating across every demographic cell we test, most conspicuously naming Sarcoidosis for young Black patients on chest X-ray. Two structural findings sharpen the problem. A hedged regime appears in which the prose acknowledges the missing image while the structured diagnosis field nevertheless names a disease, a dissociation invisible to prose-only audits. And Claude's dermatology effect collapses entirely when 'skin mole' is swapped for 'skin lesion' while GPT-5.4's is preserved, indicating that mirage is a family of distinct failure modes rather than a single phenomenon. Trustworthy VLM deployment in clinical pipelines requires auditing the structured output channel directly, and probe-word sensitivity should be treated as a first-class evaluation dimension

Background/Objectives: Dermoscopic skin-lesion classifiers lose accuracy when images arrive from a new clinic or a new device. We asked which data augmentations reduce that loss, and measured the effect under a protocol that keeps policy selection separate from policy evaluation. Methods: A ConvNeXt-Large binary malignant-versus-non-malignant classifier was trained on six dermoscopic sources (25,903 images); HAM10000 and ISIC 2016-2020 were held out of training entirely. Single augmentations, photometric combinations and eleven composite policies were ranked on a development split of 1511 held-out images. The winning policy was then evaluated on a confirmation set of 8073 held-out images that took no part in that ranking and from which we removed every image sharing a lesion identifier with the training data and every image contributed by an institution represented in training. Both policies were retrained with four random seeds each and compared with an exact permutation test. Results: The mix policy raised confirmation-set ROC-AUC from 0.787 to 0.826 (+0.039; per-seed ranges 0.772-0.797 and 0.815-0.840, non-overlapping; exact permutation p=0.029), with the same direction on each contributing source. At matched sensitivity the gain is larger in clinical terms: specificity rose from 0.612 to 0.713 at a sensitivity of 0.80, and from 0.284 to 0.397 at a sensitivity of 0.95. In-domain ROC-AUC was preserved (0.938 to 0.941). On an independent clinical cohort acquired with a different device at a different institution (472 images, 22 malignant), performance was maintained (0.934 versus 0.930). Conclusions: Augmentations that model the physical causes of domain shift improve cross-source transfer at no cost to in-domain accuracy, and the improvement survives a selection-disjoint, contamination-free evaluation.

Rigorous dataset partitioning is a foundational, yet frequently overlooked, prerequisite for reliable deep learning in longitudinal medical imaging. Naively shuffling small clinical cohorts routinely introduces covariate shifts and temporal sampling imbalances across training, validation, and test subsets, exposing downstream models to out-of-distribution evaluation. We address this vulnerability with an auditable Tripartite Dataset Analytics Framework that systematically characterizes spatial grid integrity, multi-parametric intensity fingerprints, and longitudinal temporal trajectories, quantifying the heavy-tailed feature dispersion and irregular, episodic sampling intervals typical of real-world clinical cohorts. Building on this characterization, we formalize an unsupervised spatio-temporal cohort-balancing standard operating procedure (SOP) that combines elbow-optimized K-means clustering over a standardized, six-dimensional joint intensity-temporal feature space with intra-cluster proportionate stratified sampling. On a longitudinal, contrast-enhanced $T1$-weighted brain MRI cohort (N=149), the protocol reduces the maximum cross-subset intensity bias from 34.1% under conventional random shuffling to under 2.1%, while aligning longitudinal follow-up intervals closely around the population mean. Monte Carlo stress testing across ten random seeds and three split configurations confirms that this alignment remains tightly bounded, in clear contrast to the substantial variability of random partitioning. The resulting protocol offers a reproducible, generalizable procedure for cohort engineering in variable-length longitudinal clinical imaging workflows.

Variational quantum algorithms often encounter barren plateaus, where cost gradients decay rapidly with increasing circuit depth, undermining the trainability of parameterized quantum circuits. This paper evaluates AdaInit (Adaptive Initialization), proposed by Zhuang and Cunningham, which uses large language models to propose initial parameters for quantum neural networks. We study a simplified single-query AdaInit variant paired with GPU-accelerated simulation in NVIDIA CUDA-Q and apply it to binary classification on the DMR-IR mammography dataset. AdaInit delivers 14.6 times higher gradient variance at initialization than random initialization (0.0095 vs. 0.0006), producing 160 times faster convergence (1.1s vs. 176 s) while maintaining the same classification accuracy of 61.4 percent. We provide theoretical analysis grounded in the geometry of parameterized circuit landscapes and show empirically that LLM-guided initialization places the optimizer in trainable regions of parameter space. Beyond performance, our results indicate that a single LLM query can yield informative parameters without iterative refinement, suggesting a low-overhead path to improved trainability. The findings validate AdaInit in a medical imaging setting and demonstrate its compatibility with GPU-accelerated quantum backends for practical speedups.

Medical image visualization requires volumetric rendering algorithms that preserve anatomical fidelity while maintaining high rendering speeds. To address the high computational cost of large volumetric datasets, we propose a Gaussian-based volumetric representation for efficient visualization of dense medical volumes without compromising structural and radiometric details. We optimize the proposed representation using Monte Carlo volumetric estimation, which enables training on a highly sparse subset of voxels while maintaining consistency with the dense volumetric objective. In addition, we introduce a curriculum learning strategy that progressively incorporates structured slice-based sampling during training. Sparse voxel samples provide an early global coverage of the volume, while slice samples capture spatially correlated regions that aid geometric structure and texture continuity. This combination enables the Gaussian representation to learn anatomical details of various structures and corresponding textures from sparse supervision while significantly reducing the computational cost associated with dense voxel processing. The learned representation supports slice-based rendering methods such as shear-warp volume rendering, enabling efficient visualization of multimodal medical datasets including MRI and Cryosection volumes while preserving anatomical structures. Using sparse supervision, our method achieves up to 43.86 FPS rendering with a compression ratio of 11.31:1.

Glaucoma is a group of eye diseases that damage the optic nerve, often caused by elevated intraocular pressure. It is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss and is typically developed slowly and painlessly, making it difficult to notice until significant damage has occurred. Therefore, early detection is crucial to prevent or slow the progression of vision loss. In recent years, deep learning based uni-modal models have improved the accuracy and efficiency of glaucoma detection, empowering doctors with tools for earlier diagnosis, better monitoring, and timely treatment. Building on this, multi-modal models have emerged, leveraging the strengths of different imaging modalities to learn richer and more robust representations, further enhancing glaucoma detection accuracy. However, multi-modal learning faces challenges such as imbalanced and under-optimized uni-modal representations due to joint learning objectives. To address this, we propose a balanced soft mixture-experts model with three experts and load balancing loss. The performance is measured by AUC, our proposed method surpasses the performance of all uni-modal baselines, conventional multi-modal models, and current stateof- the-art balanced multi-modal models. The proposed model can be generalized to other disease detections such as diabetic retinopathy.

In this paper, we examine the difficulties of using standard techniques for medical image classification due to long-tailed distributions (wherein rarer conditions have very few samples) resulting in bias towards diagnosing common diseases and away from rarer diseases. We then discuss and implement deep learning models with techniques such as augmentation to minimize error, especially from rarer diseases. We evaluate various different models with AP, F1 score, AUROC, and loss (all on the validation set). We conclude with the promising results from our best model, and potential applications in the healthcare space.

Medical multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly expected to perform complex image understanding tasks, yet their reliability is often compromised by frequent errors in visual interpretation. To systematically trace these failures, we traverse the hierarchy from high-level clinical tasks down to fundamental visual perception. We therefore introduce Perception-Bench, a large-scale benchmark comprising 1.13 million samples that assesses medical MLLMs across six dimensions: attribute judgment, spatial grounding, spatial understanding, disease prediction, anomaly detection, and report generation, spanning both 2D and 3D radiology images. Our analysis on Perception-Bench reveals that existing MLLMs lack the ability to capture even the most basic lesion attributes, such as location, size, and density. This inability to ground clinical outputs in primary visual evidence reveals that the models' diagnostic unreliability is rooted in a critical but overlooked bottleneck in low-level visual perception. Motivated by this, we propose RadSight, a perception-driven MLLM built upon a dual 2D/3D encoder architecture that preserves native imaging spatial structures. RadSight formulates medical image understanding as a four-stage progressive process: visual-language alignment, fine-grained visual perception, clinical diagnosis, and diagnostic interpretation. The model is trained on an 8.37 million perception-oriented corpus using progressive curriculum learning. On Perception-Bench, RadSight consistently outperforms existing MLLMs across all six evaluation dimensions, with particularly strong gains in spatial grounding and clinical diagnosis. It also achieves consistent improvements on public 2D and 3D medical benchmarks, further demonstrating that robust low-level visual perception is a critical foundation for reliable clinical understanding. Code and model will be publicly available.

This paper introduces a new benchmark test, Medical-Checklist, for assessing medical multimodal models. The recent advancements in multimodal models have demonstrated significant potential in the field of medical vision-language tasks. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that evaluating these models' performance, whether they are applied to natural or medical images, is challenging. The critical question is whether the models can accurately understand an input image while associating it with relevant input text. To address this, Medical-Checklist imposes a binary test on the models: they are given an image and two captions, where one is correct and the other incorrect, and the model must select the correct one. The incorrect caption contains a single medical concept (word or phrase) that is inaccurately substituted from the correct caption. Although the task is simple, this simplicity enables the unified assessment of diverse multimodal models designed and learned on different principles. It also enables us to verify whether models correctly understand a wide range of medical concepts across various medical sub-domains. Medical-Checklist is designed to reduce potential biases in data and to enable evaluation of the models' ability to handle out-of-distribution inputs, which were difficult in existing datasets. When evaluating four state-of-the-art medical multimodal models with Medical-Checklist, it was revealed that despite their excellent performance in specific tasks such as Med-VQA, they may not correctly understand images, suggesting a long journey ahead for clinical application. The dataset and code will be made public upon acceptance.

Image inpainting aims to reconstruct missing or corrupted regions of an image while preserving as much as possible, visual and semantic consistency. In medical imaging, this task is particularly important because artifacts, missing information, and pathological alterations can compromise diagnostic reliability and downstream clinical applications. Recently, diffusion models have emerged as state-of-the-art generative approaches for medical image inpainting due to their ability to generate anatomically consistent reconstructions. This survey presents a systematic review of diffusion-based methods for medical image inpainting, covering the main architectures, applications, datasets, and evaluation strategies reported across 60 studies. In addition, we propose a taxonomy for diffusion-based approaches. The analysis reveals a rapid growth of research interest in diffusion-based medical image inpainting, with denoising diffusion probabilistic models and latent diffusion models emerging as the dominant architectures. The reviewed studies mainly focus on artifact removal, data augmentation, pseudo-healthy tissue reconstruction, and anomaly detection, particularly in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography imaging. Overall, diffusion models demonstrate strong performance in producing anatomically plausible reconstructions and aiding downstream clinical tasks. However, the review also highlights important challenges, including the lack of standardized benchmarks, limited dataset diversity, and restricted validation procedures across diverse clinical applications and imaging scenarios.