Human-Robot Collaboration

We investigate the challenges of enabling effective collaboration between human operators and heterogeneous autonomous agents in complex, dynamic environments by developing an interaction platform that allows study of operator behavior and supports intent inference and decision-making using state-of-the-art frameworks. We demonstrate the extent to which the operator's perception, decisions, and actions could be supported by autonomous systems during search-and-rescue operations with our platform.

We focus on human-robot collaborative transport, a challenging task of broad relevance spanning logistics, manufacturing, and the home, in which a user and a robot work together to relocate a large or heavy object. To act as an effective partner, the robot should reduce the user's effort by contributing to efficient relocation of the object while remaining physically responsive to them. Prior work often addresses these capabilities separately, producing robots that may move the object efficiently but resist user input, or accommodate the user but depend on continuous guidance. Our key insight is that obstacle-constrained collaborative transport requires integrating predictions of human collaborative behavior with compliant robot control. To this end, we introduce PROACT, a framework for human-robot collaborative transport that incorporates anticipation into compliant whole-body control through a learned model of human collaborative behavior. Trained on a large-scale, real-world dataset of dyadic human transport demonstrations, our transformer architecture distills collaborative behavior into predictions of future object motion. Across 108 real-world trials with a 9-DoF mobile manipulator, PROACT reduces mean interaction work by 59.2% and 20.4%, and mean completion time by 12.9% and 6.9%, relative to compliance-only and MPC baselines, respectively. Footage from our experiments can be found at https://youtu.be/qAGvQfVPjbk.

The introduction of human-robot collaboration (HRC) in industrial assembly operations is revolutionizing the manufacturing landscape. In this evolving environment, operators are required to seamlessly coordinate their manual tasks with real-time task information and robotic behaviors. These demands fluctuate during operation, yet conventional workload assessments depend on body-worn physiological sensors that complicate practical deployment. Here, we present a vision-based attention--action framework for continuous and interpretable workload-related assessment in HRC assembly. The framework combines RGB-D observations with robot states and calibrated task-related areas to construct a temporally confirmed representation of operator behavior. This representation identifies where task demand is concentrated and explains how it develops when attention and action diverge, the task context changes, or the operator hesitates. We evaluated the framework in a three-level collaborative gearbox assembly experiment with ten participants, using subjective ratings and synchronized physiological signals as independent references. Raw NASA-TLX ratings confirmed increasing perceived workload across conditions, with significant effects on overall workload and its mental and temporal dimensions. The vision-derived HRC-CWL output was significantly associated with ECG-derived features in seven of nine participants with complete correlation data. Synchronized interaction episodes further showed temporal correspondence between detected hesitation and physiological activity. Real-time deployment demonstrated that the framework can operate without requiring operators to wear additional sensors. These findings support HRC-CWL as an interpretable behavioral proxy for cognitive ergonomics analysis and adaptive robot assistance, rather than a direct psychophysiological measure of workload.

A confidence-aware multimodal fusion framework (CAMF) is proposed to realize reliable human intention prediction for industrial human-robot collaboration. This framework fuses four heterogeneous modalities including object 6D pose, gaze, skeletal motion and IMU-based hand motion. It embeds a confidence-trend-driven dynamic fusion mechanism into BiLSTM to adaptively balance bidirectional temporal features according to real-time modality reliability. A confidence-guided balanced learning strategy combined with a confidence freezing mechanism is further adopted to adjust network gradients dynamically, suppress noise from low-quality modalities and mitigate cross-modal learning bias. A physical platform based on the UR3 collaborative robot is built for experimental validation. Comparative results show that the proposed method reaches an intention recognition accuracy of 91.86% and outperforms existing multimodal fusion approaches in overall performance and stability. It also maintains satisfactory accuracy under low light and partial occlusion interference. In practical assembly tasks, the framework enables proactive and stable human-robot cooperation with strong environmental adaptability.

Many pedestrian trajectory prediction algorithms have been proposed to improve the safety of navigation for mobile robots working in human-robot coexistence environments. Some pedestrian trajectory prediction algorithms extract information about obstacles near pedestrians from top-down view images to improve the accuracy of trajectory prediction. However, mobile robots typically create local occupancy maps using LiDAR, rather than top-down view images. Meanwhile, the vision sensors on board robots provide egocentric view images, which contain fine-grained behavioral information about the pedestrians near the robot. To better use the information collected by LiDAR and on-board vision sensors, we propose MamMA, a Mamba-based pedestrian trajectory prediction algorithm considering occupancy maps and pedestrian awareness states. MamMA divides the occupancy map by patches and extracts obstacle features from each patch to create map features. Pedestrian awareness states are divided and considered, as some studies show that awareness states affect the perception and speed of pedestrians. Furthermore, a Mamba-based model is proposed to predict the future trajectories of pedestrians based on different types of features. Experiments on the STCrowd, SiT, JRDB, ETH, and UCY datasets show that MamMA achieves better average displacement error and final displacement error than the state-of-the-art algorithms.

Highly varying production sets increasing challenges for robotic manufacturing and indoor logistics. New capabilities for agility, flexibility, and robustness are needed. Robot skills, integrating motions, tool operations, and sensor perceptions consistently provide an execution mechanism for a versatile set of tasks with varying parameters. In this paper, easy-to-use CAD-model based programming and execution system for parametrized skills and skill monitors is showcased. The execution control structure is dynamic and parametrized, based on a modified Behavior Tree, where only event based communication is used. A human-robot-crane collaborative skill is shown as a test example, where a human instructs an overhead crane and a manipulator in inserting a heavy object supported by the crane, and guided by the manipulator, into the goal.

Better probability scores do not establish that evidence has been counted correctly. Repeated inference over one observation can improve predictions without adding an evidential origin. Source-local numerical attributes alone cannot in general distinguish repeated derivations from separately countable acquisitions. PACT (Provenance-Aware evidence Conservation and Typed action admission) separates evidence magnitude from countability through a supplied provenance partition. Under singleton fidelity and insertion non-amplification, the coordinatewise meet is the unique pointwise greatest admissible within-component rule. Component budgets add under stated commensurability and separate-component additivity assumptions. Matched reassignments hold numerical outputs fixed while varying the counting relation. In four of 12 replicated-source tests on HandWritten, false refinement lowers macro-averaged negative log-likelihood and Brier score while increasing normalized common-support area under the risk-coverage curve (ncsAURC). In the controlled handover benchmark, removing the constructed adversarial-consensus condition leaves a 0.056 reduction in ncsAURC for provenance-partition aggregation relative to singleton aggregation under the same score functional. The corroboration contrast disappears, and method ranking remains selection-score dependent. In offline, reference-based human-robot collaboration with four prompts per camera and all other admission inputs fixed, duplicating each prompt output within its camera from multiplicity one to eight leaves all 720 PACT typed responses per checkpoint unchanged. Probability quality and evidence countability require separate evaluation.

Physical human-robot collaboration requires a robot to provide assistance when human intention is clear while remaining compliant when several future motions are plausible. We present an adaptive stiffness framework based on generative action-chunk sampling. Conditioned on an RGB image and external joint-torque estimates, the policy samples multiple latent variables from an observation-conditioned prior and decodes them into future action chunks. Variation among the sampled action chunks is used to continuously adapt joint stiffness and damping. Greater variation makes the robot more compliant to facilitate human guidance, whereas lower variation provides firmer assistance. In a real-world collaborative transport task with four possible directions, the proposed method achieved an average success rate of 0.95, compared with 0.83 for a fixed-stiffness ablation and 0.69 for a deterministic baseline. Near direction determination, variation among the sampled action chunks increased, and the controller reduced stiffness accordingly. These results suggest that variation among actions sampled by a generative policy can serve as an online control signal for balancing assistance and compliance in physical human-robot interaction.

Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) plays a vital role in dynamic, high mix, low volume industrial scenarios such as remanufacturing, which frequently face workcell rearrangements. Traditional setups are constrained by power and data cabling, restricting modularity and reconfigurations, while the selection of commercial wireless devices suitable for real-time perception and safe collaboration are limited in availability. This paper presents a highly flexible, wireless, 5G-based system that serves as a versatile experimental testbed for applications including remanufacturing, operator training, and user studies. To eliminate infrastructure barriers, the workcell integrates a novel battery-powered, multi-sensor platform prototype. Additionally, to support operator safety and system adaptability across environmental shifts, the system integrates a computer vision module for object detection and pose estimation, further augmented for robust hand recognition. Trained on synthetic and real data, the model reliably detects oriented grasping poses and human hands across varying lighting and background conditions (with an mAP@50-95 of 97.74 +- 0.10% and a mean inference time of 12.5 ms). Offloading these computationally intensive tasks to the edge via 5G, the proposed architecture contributes to resolving the bandwidth-latency trade-off. To demonstrate portability, the system was implemented in both Hungary and Norway, and was evaluated across a combination of public and private, Standalone and Non-Standalone 5G infrastructures. The performed network experiments produced results in round-trip response times down to 12 ms in case of compatible network-device pairings, suitable for safe, adaptive HRC. However, these measurements also revealed practical limitations related to interoperability in current 5G deployments that should be addressed in future works.

We present a structured large-language-model (LLM) architecture for zero-shot human--robot coordination in a cooperative construction task with private goal views. Guided by a Dec-POMDP formulation, the architecture decomposes decision-making into (i) action-conditioned Theory-of-Mind (ToM) inference, (ii) hierarchical planning, (iii) conversation interpretation, (iv) action verification, and (v) feedback-based replanning. We compare the proposed method with an ablation without ToM inference and a multi-agent reinforcement-learning policy trained offline over many goal pairs. In human-participant experiments, the proposed method required fewer interaction steps and yielded higher post-interaction trust ratings than both baselines. These results suggest that systematically decomposing the team decision problem, using LLMs as tractable surrogates for otherwise intractable inference and planning computations, and retaining conventional verification for physical feasibility can improve both task coordination and the human experience.

This work presents a human-centered collaborative framework that integrates Preference-Based Optimization (PBO) and Dynamic Movement Primitives (DMPs) to optimize robot-assisted tasks such as painting. The system allows the operator to perform the process while the robot adapts its behavior in real-time, dynamically adjusting the orientation of the piece in order to match the orientation of the operator's hand. The PBO framework leverages the GLISp algorithm to iteratively refine control parameters such as execution time, robot responsiveness, and rotation amplification through human feedback. Moreover, DMPs have been modified to enhance the reactive behavior of the robot and its adaptability to ergonomic requirements. The method was validated with a heterogeneous group of participants executing \rev{painting tasks}. The results show that our strategy effectively reduces operator effort while optimizing process outcomes.

Motion planning in dynamic environments is a fundamental problem in robotics, aiming to generate safe and efficient paths, trajectories, or control actions in the presence of moving obstacles, uncertain predictions, and multi-agent interactions. It has broad applications in autonomous driving, service robotics, warehouse logistics, human-robot collaboration, crowd navigation, and multi-robot systems. This survey reviews representative works published primarily between 2015 and 2025, with a particular focus on how recent learning-based advances extend, complement, or interact with classical planning foundations. We first revisit classical planning methods as algorithmic foundations and reference frameworks for learning-based extensions. We then propose a role-of-learning taxonomy that categorizes existing methods according to how learning participates in the planning pipeline, including direct policy learning, learning-augmented classical planning, hybrid planning, and training enhancement methods. For each category, we summarize the main problem settings, representative algorithms, key ideas, integration mechanisms, strengths, and limitations. We further analyze how observation representations, prediction uncertainty, interaction modeling, planner integration, safety constraints, and training strategies shape learning-based motion planning in dynamic environments. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future directions, including sim-to-real gap, safe and certifiable planning, dense crowd navigation, perception-planning coupling, and embodied AI.

Collaborative robotics is a representative task-oriented 6G use-case, where communication quality should be reflected in mission execution, environment understanding, and closed-loop operation rather than packet delivery alone. This demo paper presents a robot-edge semantic communication (SemCom) testbed integrating robot-side visual compression, edge-side semantic mapping, and dashboard-based mission interaction. A mobile robot equipped with RGB-D sensing and LiDAR runs ROS 2, while a Jetson Orin edge node performs reconstruction, RTAB-Map mapping, semantic object handling, and browserbased visualization. As an initial proof of concept, RGB frames are encoded on the robot into VQ-VAE tokens using an ONNX Runtime encoder and reconstructed on the edge using a PyTorch decoder. A 320 X 240 image is represented by an 80 X 60 token grid with a packed payload of 5400 bytes, corresponding to a 42.67X reduction relative to model-input RGB bytes. The reconstructed visual stream is further associated with depth, pose, and 3D mapping information to generate a semantic map for downstream robotic applications. The demo exposes the full path from semantic visual transport to object-level map interaction, and provides a practical platform for future task-aware 6G networking studies at the intersection of SemCom, embodied AI, and physical AI-enabled robotics. A video of the demo is available at https://tinyurl.com/Tos09

Assistance games formalize human-robot collaboration under asymmetric information: the human knows the goal, while the robot must infer it from observation and interaction in order to assist effectively. In general, computing optimal assistance game strategies online is intractable, since exact solutions require planning in a POMDP. We identify a class of assistance games in which pragmatic-pedagogic reasoning resolves goal uncertainty in a single time step, rendering the full-horizon game exactly solvable by a tractable best-response procedure. Within this class, we show that mainstream inverse optimal control exhibits an inference ceiling that hinders alignment, while pragmatic-pedagogic reasoning overcomes this barrier by immediately disambiguating goals through actions that look equivalent under task execution alone. Finally, we validate our theoretical results and proposed method on a simple collaborative block-building example.

Effective collaboration with novel and diverse partners is a crucial skill for autonomous agents. Most current ad-hoc teamwork (AHT) approaches assume that agents will collaborate on a single, fixed task and that the partner's capabilities, their ability to successfully execute the desired action, are already known. In reality, a partner's true capabilities are often hidden, and human collaborators may act sub-optimally on tasks with multiple valid strategies. To address these limitations, we extend ad-hoc teamwork into a multi-task setting by re-framing it as a problem of joint planning with decentralised execution under hidden partner capabilities. We introduce CE-CM (Capability Estimation via Contextual Models), an approximate Bayesian method that infers task-invariant capability vectors. By using simulation-based sampling, the agent estimates capabilities and induces a contextual Multi-agent Markov Decision Processes for planning. This approach requires no population pre-training and refines its beliefs online from just a few tasks. To account for human unpredictability, we propose CE-CM-Div, an extension that evaluates capability hypotheses against diverse planner rollouts rather than a single optimal trajectory. Simulated experiments demonstrate that CE-CM rapidly recovers hidden capabilities, reduces infeasible action assignments, and adapts to changes over time. Furthermore, in an offline human study of 225 trajectories from 15 participants, CE-CM-Div substantially improved capability estimates over the baseline CE-CM method. Our results suggest capability-based modelling is a promising interpretable, task-agnostic representation in the studied settings, demonstrating that accounting for behavioural diversity is essential for robust human-AI teaming.

Collaborative robots are well-suited to maritime missions that benefit from coordination, such as the exploration of unknown reef structures, inspection of subsea infrastructure, or search-and-rescue operations. These missions typically provide sparse feedback signals for measuring progress and require adherence to safety and regulatory norms, turning a mission into a multi-objective optimization problem. Coevolutionary algorithms can process these sparse feedback signals to generate coordinated behaviors, and in some cases extend behaviors to multiple objectives. However, incorporating high-level team objectives with low-level compliance considerations on the fly to balance norm adherence with team performance remains elusive. This paper introduces a multi-objective framework that blends coevolved behaviors with compliance behaviors to achieve a balance between maximizing team progress and minimizing norm violations. The key insight is to decouple learning from compliance since operational norms are prescribed rather than discovered. We demonstrate that our framework achieves high team performance while avoiding collisions on a collaborative swimmer rescue mission with up to 8 vehicles in a hardware deployment, and 12 vehicles in simulation. The key contribution of this paper is Marine Multi-Objective Compliance-Integrated Coevolution (MMOCIC), a framework that blends team-wide optimization with established norms for real-world deployments of learning-based coordination.

Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) in shared physical spaces using Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces is powered by Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM). Existing multi-agent SLAM systems rely on an edge server to combine visual findings of multiple resource-constrained agents, perform computation, and schedule updates to their local maps. However, the edge treats all agents uniformly and ignores the fundamentally different latency requirements of heterogeneous HRC agents: robots and head-mounted AR users. This uniform resource allocation often results in high lag for user manipulation, as it does not meet the stringent latency requirements of AR. In this work, we design, implement, and evaluate SHARE, a user-centric SLAM system that strategically prioritizes AR user experience while maintaining accurate tracking performance for robots. SHARE builds a first-of-its-kind experience model for HRC agents and adaptively adjusts transmission priorities to match it. To reduce end-to-end latency, SHARE leverages the redundancy of visual features acquired by agents in shared human-robot workspaces to reduce computation time induced by edge-based processing. Real-world deployment with commercial AR headsets and a ground robot achieves 13.22 ms average latency for AR users (43.3% reduction from baseline) while maintaining sub-2-centimeter tracking accuracy. User studies further reveal statistically significant improvements in user perception.

Multi-stream robot manipulation policies achieve unparalleled sample efficiency and generalization by modeling actions relative to environmental reference frames. However, existing approaches typically assume these frames to be strictly exogenous. This causal assumption collapses in dynamic settings, such as when a single robot arm manipulates a moving object or when two arms coordinate, where each arm effectively becomes part of the dynamic environment of the other. We propose DynaMAC, a lightweight, policy-agnostic framework that resolves this causal limitation while preserving the sample efficiency, computational speed, and flexibility of multi-stream policies, DynaMAC treats the opposite arm as a dynamic task parameter, thereby providing a unified formulation for dynamic manipulation and bimanual coordination without requiring an explicit leader-follower relationship. To rigorously evaluate these capabilities, we introduce DynaBench, a novel benchmark for robot manipulation in dynamic environments. Across both dynamic environments and bimanual manipulation tasks, DynaMAC outperforms leading probabilistic and generative baselines by over 35 percentage points while requiring 20 times fewer samples. Crucially, DynaMAC generalizes zero-shot from static demonstrations to dynamic environments, substantially simplifying data collection and establishing an elegant bridge toward human-robot collaboration.

Collaborative robots are increasingly sharing workspaces with human operators, making tool handover a frequent and safety-critical micro-interaction. However, traditional static handovers often lead to awkward grasps when handling asymmetric industrial tools. This paper presents a receiver-centered voice-driven adaptive handover system for mechanical tools, built on a Franka cobot. Using an LLM for intention recognition and MediaPipe for real-time 3D hand tracking, the framework dynamically adjusts the end-effector's orientation to present tools in an ergonomically optimal, handle-first pose. A within-subjects study compared this adaptive approach with an object-agnostic static baseline. The results demonstrate that the adaptive system reduces the grasp delay for asymmetric tools, improving the fluency of the interaction. Furthermore, the adaptive strategy improved specific trust-related perceptions, particularly motion predictability and perceived task simplicity.

Autonomous data collection governs the volume and quality of real-world trajectories for manipulation policy learning. Existing pipelines reduce human effort via self-resetting, VLM verification, or language-guided correction, yet episode-scoped fixes must be reissued whenever the same failure recurs, so oversight cost grows with session length rather than with the number of distinct problems. We present Zero2Skill, a human-robot symbiotic agentic system in which corrections are retained and reused across rounds. The collection loop collects, verifies, and resets autonomously, pausing for a remote operator only when a phase exhausts an explicit retry budget. An LLM parser maps each natural-language utterance to a structured adjustment stored in Corrective Memory, so addressed failure modes typically need not be corrected again under the same conditions. On a real-robot desktop-clearing testbed, Zero2Skill matches teleoperation episode success while reducing human working time to 16%. Language corrections improve verifier-human agreement in all four evaluated settings and raise average single-attempt success from 12.5% to 47.5% (arm-selection: 20.0% to 50.0%). Policies fine-tuned on Zero2Skill data match teleoperation-trained policy success at a fraction of collection human cost.

Robots operating in human-robot collaboration must communicate not only their intended actions but also uncertainty arising from incomplete or ambiguous perception. This work introduces a mathematical framework for expressing perceptual uncertainty through robotic manipulator motion. Drawing on Laban Movement Analysis, robot behavior is organized in a Commitment-Vigilance state space that maps uncertainty-related states - confidence, curiosity, hesitance, fear, and inactivity - to distinct Laban Effort signatures. Five motion primitives - approach, pause, retreat, exploration, and oscillation - are then parameterized using eleven kinematic and geometric descriptors, including acceleration, pause and retreat characteristics, gaze angles, tilt, and shiver amplitude. A video-based human-subject study evaluated recognition of four expressive trajectories and the influence of individual descriptors on perceived intensity. Participants reliably identified the intended behavioral states, while several descriptors significantly modulated expressiveness. The results establish a perceptually grounded basis for encoding robot uncertainty in motion and support future autonomous trajectory generation using parametric movement representations for collaborative tasks in shared environments. Code, videos, questionnaire and appendices are available at "https://bit.ly/github-aou".

Integrating mobile robots into human teams promises significant capability improvements for tasks such as searching hazardous environments. Unlike existing teleoperated robots, future robot systems will increasingly be endowed with some level of artificial intelligence (AI), giving them a degree of autonomy in how they pursue mission goals. This autonomy could make a human-agent (robot) team more effective but also put inter-agent trust under strain if robots make a mistake, or (appear to) pursue task priorities that conflict with the team's best interest. During a mission, agents' trust states are anticipated to vary according to the situation as understood by each teammate (trustor). If component-level (agent) or system-level trust falls below sufficient levels for cooperative tasks to be completed, it could critically affect mission success . We argue that active trust management will be an important precondition for the success of human-robot teams (HRTs, a subcategory of human-agent teams with embodied agents), especially in dynamic, high-risk environments. We present a trust satisficing perspective which acknowledges and attempts to account for the fluctuating, multi-faceted, and context-dependent nature of trust and trust requirements even under normal operating conditions. Our outline of a trust management framework for human-robot teaming includes online measurement of proxy metrics for trust, closed-loop adaptation of robot behavior, and variable autonomy to give space for human responsibility in situations requiring value judgements. We refer to a recent experimental exploration of 'swift trust' and a novel behavioral trust metric for HRT, and we highlight issues for further investigation.

The transition of autonomous mobile robots from controlled industrial settings to dynamic, human-centric environments, such as manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare, has made their safe and autonomous operation a critical area of research. These sophisticated machines must be capable of perceiving, understanding, and interacting with their surroundings to navigate freely and perform complex tasks. A significant obstacle to achieving this is the lack of comprehensive contextual awareness, which requires a robot to recognize its spatial environment and identify the objects and actors within it. Without this perceptual knowledge, robots struggle to plan adaptive behaviors or engage in meaningful interaction with humans. This thesis presents novel solutions to this challenge by exploring two distinct but complementary research directions. The first direction involves human re-identification and tracking to improve Human-Robot Collaboration. Our developed approach enables a mobile robot to recognize a specific person, facilitating targeted collaboration while ignoring other individuals. The second direction focuses on enhancing the robot's overall perceptual capabilities to understand its environment geometrically and semantically. Geometric information is vital for motion planning and collision avoidance, while semantic knowledge provides the robot with a richer understanding for more advanced interaction. Both solutions are driven by the improvement of the semantical understanding of robots that enhance their knowledge of their surroundings, allowing a smoother and more natural interaction between robots, humans, and the environment. The contributions of this work in human re-identification and environmental understanding represent a significant step toward a future where robots are more contextually aware, enabling safer coexistence and more effective collaboration.

Human-human collaboration is a fundamental aspect of everyday life, essential to success in a wide range of goal-directed activities from household tasks to professional teamwork. While much research has focused on modeling coordination and task execution, the cognitive processes that support such collaboration, particularly Theory of Mind (the ability to infer the mental states of others), remain difficult to study in natural settings. To address this gap, we introduce a novel egocentric and exocentric video dataset capturing real-world collaboration in cooking scenarios. The dataset integrates multi-perspective video, high-quality audio, gaze tracking, and 3D scene and object scans, with annotations for shared attention to objects, social cues and interactions between agents, as well as agent-object interactions. We establish benchmarks for Joint Attention Estimation, Socially Conditioned Object Interaction Anticipation, and Collaborative Handover Prediction, enabling research on multimodal perception, proactive assistance, and collaborative planning. By providing temporally aligned, richly annotated multimodal data, CoMind facilitates the development and evaluation of AI systems capable of modeling complex social interactions and reasoning about human behaviors in collaborative environments. Our dataset and benchmarks are made available at https://comind.ethz.ch/.

Current vision-language-action (VLA) benchmarks primarily evaluate isolated manipulation skills while leaving human-robot interaction structure largely unmodeled. However, real-world collaboration fundamentally requires coordination under shared agency, including intent understanding, temporal synchronization, protocol adherence, and safe interaction in dynamic environments. To address this gap, we introduce HRIBench, a diagnostic benchmark for intent-aware human-robot collaboration based on executable interaction scenarios. HRIBench represents collaborative tasks as structured scenario scripts that explicitly model agent roles, temporal dependencies, coordination constraints, and human behavior distributions. Building on this abstraction, HRIBench defines three representative interaction roles: Instructor, Collaborator, and Intruder, covering intent communication, joint coordination, and robustness under human intervention. The benchmark contains 13 role-conditioned tasks with over 650 evaluation episodes generated from diverse interaction trajectories and scene variations. Beyond binary task success, HRIBench introduces interpretable interaction-centric metrics spanning synchronization, responsiveness, protocol compliance, and safety. We evaluate adapted policies based on GR00T, pi0.5, and ACT under a unified protocol. Results show that current foundation robot policies struggle substantially in collaborative settings despite strong manipulation ability, revealing major limitations in temporal coordination and intent-aware behavior. Fine-tuning on HRIBench consistently improves collaborative performance. In a real-world adaptation study, simulation data generated by HRIBench improves GR00T N1.5's physical-task success rate from 0.10 to 0.43, demonstrating the benchmark's value for advancing interaction-centric robot learning.

The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse areas of human activity-ranging from everyday tasks to safety-critical applications-aims to enhance decision-making effectiveness with minimal human feedback. Concurrently, it seeks to align decisions with human expectations, preferences, and needs while mitigating risks associated with AI non-determinism. However, humans frequently over- or under-rely on AI recommendations, and current AI systems remain poorly calibrated to human expectations. To address these challenges, we introduce a human-AI collaborative decision-making framework designed to augment human capabilities and align AI agents with human preferences and expectations. Specifically, this paper (a) formulates the collaborative decision-making task as a stochastic game between an AI agent and a human player, and (b) proposes the Human-Centric Reflective Architecture (HCRA), which integrates human-calibrated models with reinforcement learning agents that leverage linguistic feedback in an iterative, reflective process. Evaluation results demonstrate that HCRA enhances decision-making effectiveness and delivers high-quality recommendations.

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) holds significant potential for crowd robot navigation in human-robot coexistence applications. However, the inherent complexity of pedestrian motion renders the design of effective reward functions for promoting socially compliant robot behaviors a persistent challenge. This paper proposes a Social Preference Learning for Crowd Robot Navigation (SPLC) algorithm to eliminate the need for detailed reward design. Its core innovation lies in the introduction of a social preference feedback mechanism to automatically generate preference data through principled preference evaluation criteria. By explicitly accounting for the intricacies of pedestrian dynamics, the pipeline mitigates the reward bias and facilitates the systematic quantification of broad social norms, thereby fostering socially compliant behaviors. Extensive experiments integrating SPLC with offline RL methods demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art baselines across standard performance metrics. Furthermore, real-world experiments on the TurtleBot4 further validate the effectiveness of SPLC in practical human-robot coexistence settings. Our code and video demos are available at https://github.com/sklus949/SPLC.

We present a conceptual framework for analyzing dialogue in collaborative problem-solving contexts, with an emphasis on the emerging dynamics of human-AI and multi-agent collaboration. As intelligent systems become active agents capable of autonomous reasoning and strategic cooperation, understanding the dialogic interaction during collaborative problem solving is increasingly important for optimizing and evaluating such partnerships. Our framework addresses key limitations in current analytical approaches through a hierarchical two-layer coding scheme that integrates cognitive and non-cognitive problem solving with metacognitive regulatory mechanisms. We demonstrate its effectiveness and generalizability across nine datasets spanning multiple domains, and provide insights into how humans and agents coordinate their knowledge, skills, and efforts to solve complex problems, showing in particular that metacognitive regulation can be an essential discriminator of deeper collaboration.

This chapter describes EMCAR, a novel software tool for programming robot motion that leverages the unique affordances of artistic practices such as puppetry and drawing to conceive, design, and program novel interactions and realize new use cases for HRI. The advantage of this no-code platform is that it expands creative applications for collaborative robots - putting robots directly in the hands of artists - and provides an inclusive environment that enables individuals with little or no technical backgrounds to engage meaningfully in collaborations and robotics research.

Assistive robotic systems face a fundamental trade-off: fully autonomous systems lack user agency, while fully user-controlled systems demand continuous cognitive effort. Existing shared autonomy approaches blend human and robot commands but are mostly deployed in separate physical bodies. We introduce co-embodiment with variable autonomy, where human and robot share a single physical body and operate at different autonomy levels across task phases, from mutual autonomy during object search and grasping to human-dominant control during actuation. We present a co-embodied, wearable robotic hand that has its own mind'' and operates with variable autonomy levels. A learning-from-demonstration visuomotor diffusion policy enables autonomous grasping when the user positions the hand near known objects. Once grasped, the system signals completion and the human can actuate the grasped tool (drill, spray bottle, infrared thermometer, lighter, and ice-cream scoop) via hands-free head gestures. The human retains veto authority at all times through a release gesture that returns the system to the initial phase. Unlike blended autonomy, where control is continuously negotiated, our co-embodied approach consists of variable autonomy from full human control to full independent actions while maintaining physical coupling, realizing a one body, two minds paradigm. In a user study with 44 participants performing five bimanual tasks, users rapidly adapted to this two minds'' paradigm: completion times improved by 23.3% across trials ($p < 0.001$, Cohen's $d = 0.94$), the best-performing policy variant reached a 93.6% task success rate, and acceptance ratings were high (5.70/7 overall impression, 5.52/7 daily use willingness). This work establishes co-embodiment with variable autonomy as a viable approach for assistive robotics, enabling human-robot collaboration through co-embodiment.

Human-robot collaboration (HRC) often requires robot intentions and internal states to be conveyed to users for task efficiency and safety. Recently, augmented reality (AR) situated analytics provide such real-time robot feedback in HRC contexts. However, AR situated analytics can obstruct important real-world elements, posing safety and usability risks, especially when content is dynamically positioned relative to movements of mobile robots in a warehouse HRC scenario. In this paper, we introduce the Augmented Reality Technique Of Obstruction Deterrence while Aiding Robotic Teaming for Users (ARTOO-DARTU), an AR system tailored specifically for warehouse HRC that enables real-time robot situated analytics and control while preserving visibility of the real world through an obstruction detection and mitigation pipeline (ODM) that is uniquely suited for AR-HRC. To evaluate ARTOO-DARTU, we developed Pocket MonstARs, a controlled gamified abstraction of HRC warehouse inventory picking in which virtual monsters serve as proxies for pick targets, while labeled and object-marked boxes preserve the real-world identification demands of the picking task. In a 34-participant user study, we found that our designed AR situated analytics yielded a 46% increase in efficiency on the overall HRC task, but only when the ODM was active. Participants with the ODM active were also 61% faster on subtasks requiring visibility of the real world. Our findings demonstrate that, when paired with our developed ODM to prevent real-world obstructions, the situated analytics in ARTOO-DARTU can significantly enhance efficiency and user experience in AR-HRC warehouse scenarios.

Augmented Reality (AR) can improve collocated human-robot collaboration by making robot state and intent visible and enabling intuitive control, yet large, visually diverse environments like the outdoors challenge both interaction and content legibility, especially at long distances and beyond visual line of sight. We present fARfetch, an AR-HRC system that integrates (i) shared semantic environment mapping across an AR headset and robot that visualizes detected landmarks in AR to support landmark-grounded go-to commands, (ii) a context-aware world-in-miniature representation of the shared environment for fine-grained path authoring, and (iii) vision-language-model driven AR view management that jointly adapts virtual content color, size, and orientation to maintain legibility in large visually diverse environments. We implement fARfetch with a Meta Quest 3 headset and Unitree Go2 quadruped robot, and conduct a within-subjects user study (N=13) on a real-world large-scale (30.5m) outdoor inspection task. fARfetch yielded significantly faster completion times than a non-AR baseline (66%) and significantly lower workload in mental demand (-43%), temporal demand (-34%), and frustration (-66%). A custom legibility survey indicated fARfetch effectively maintained virtual content legibility in the large outdoor environment.

The rapid rise of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in egocentric visual understanding has made low-latency inference in human-robot collaborative (HRC) tasks increasingly critical. Weight pruning techniques developed for VLMs to shrink model size and computation can be readily applied to satisfy the efficiency demands of on-board processing and real-time interactive robotics. Moreover, safe human-robot interaction demands pruning strategies that preserve doubly-correct predictions; outputs must be both accurate and evidentially grounded to mitigate risks and ensure user trust. In this paper, we present a new study of VLM pruning through the lens of doubly-correct prediction. Our experiments surprisingly show that existing pruning methods often preserve the right evidence localization but undermine correct prediction. To address this, we propose a rationale-informed pruning strategy that better aligns evidence with decisions. Benchmark results on egocentric video datasets demonstrate that our method not only achieves the highest prediction accuracy but also outperforms existing approaches in attaining doubly-correct predictions. We aim to stimulate research on efficient and reliable VLMs, ensuring accuracy-driven advances align with the transparency, auditability, and safety required for responsible human-robot interaction and embodied intelligence.

Human-hand demonstrations provide a direct and scalable source of physical interaction data for robot learning. While manual retargeting is indispensable for establishing kinematic action correspondence across different morphologies, robust transfer requires going beyond geometry to address the underlying alignment of physical dynamics between human and robot manipulation. To address this, we introduce LaST-HD, a novel human-to-robot action learning paradigm that extends reasoning-before-acting VLA by aligning human-hand and robot demonstrations in a shared latent reasoning space. Rather than mimicking human kinematics, LaST-HD trains an auxiliary action-conditioned world model on unpaired human-hand and robot trajectories to synthesize unified latent targets. After aligning cross-embodiment representations in this shared forward-dynamics space, these targets supervise LaST-HD's latent reasoning process, enabling it to internalize shared physical dynamics and drive efficient human-hand action learning. Moreover, we develop Out-of-Lab (OOL) Glove, a low-cost motion-capture glove tailored to LaST-HD for human-hand data collection. The captured human data provide precise keypoints and serve as universal action supervision across grippers and dexterous hands. Armed with the aligned latent space and high-fidelity human-hand data, we develop a progressive mixed-to-human training recipe comprising mixed human-robot co-training and human-hand online correction post-training. Through mixed co-training, LaST-HD improves generalization to novel objects, scenes, and positions using only human-hand demonstrations. With online correction, LaST-HD further adapts to novel environments and achieves over 90% accuracy using only 20 minutes of OOL glove data.

The imperative to develop more sustainable agriculture demands a transition from isolated automation toward the deployment of multi-robot systems (MRS) in agrifood environments. However, Mediterranean greenhouse settings-characterized by narrow corridors, dense biomass, and structural metallic interference-pose significant challenges for robust and scalable communication between agents. Traditional robotic frameworks, such as ROS 2, frequently encounter node discovery issues and latency spikes due to dynamic obstacles, dense foliage, and other characteristic greenhouse elements, creating a critical bottleneck for real-time coordination. This paper proposes an innovative cloud-based hybrid architecture that establishes a two-way communication bridge between ROS 2, acting as an edge computing platform, and iVeg as a Decision Support System (DSS), using MQTT and the European FIWARE platform. The proposed framework enables seamless interoperability between fleets of multiple robots in environments with communication constraints, facilitating the synchronised exchange of high-level telemetry, point cloud data and farmer identification for collaboration, amongst other critical data. The architecture was validated in a high-fidelity simulation environment and subsequently tested in a real-world greenhouse scenario, demonstrating its ability to maintain persistent connectivity and data integrity under adverse network conditions. The results indicate that the integration of MQTT effectively eliminates information silos, providing a scalable and decentralised solution for managing complex robotic missions, which are executed locally via Edge Computing. This work sets a new methodological precedent for the concept of Greenhouse Models as a Service (GMaaS), bridging the gap between low-level robotic control and high-level, cloud-based IoT decision-making.

Human Action Recognition (HAR) is frequently investigated in Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) research to understand what actions have been performed and hence the state of a collaborative task. Accurately tracking an assembly state from HAR is however not fully investigated, and in realistic scenarios is not a trivial task. This research systematically investigates and compares methods for tracking assembly state using action recognition inputs. Investigations using two diverse datasets and five state tracking approaches, including logic-based, Hidden Markov Model (HMM), and neural network (NN) methods, show that optimal approaches are not uniform across different tasks and that different methods fail under different circumstances. Testing is performed using both simulated inputs with varying noise levels and realistic inputs from a HAR model. Results show NN and HMM methods can perform well in tasks with limited variability, but for other scenarios logic-based approaches can be more robust. Methods which model expected action duration are also important for tasks with repeated actions where no additional sensing is provided.

Art has long stood as a pivotal expression of human creativity. Embodied artificial intelligence offers a route for generative models to participate in that creativity through physical action rather than disembodied digital content. In robotic music co-creation, it is challenging to connect semantic musical understanding with real-time and physically executable performance. We present Co-policy, a framework for human-robot musical co-creation that separates semantic intent grounding, constrained musical variation, and visuomotor execution. To ground musical semantics, Co-policy uses pre-inference semantic anchors and a fine-tuned Qwen-vl planner (F-Qwen) to transform speech, live musical seeds, and visual observations into structured co-creation plans. To support low-latency execution, Co-policy introduces a Gaussian-Mixture Visuomotor Policy (GMP), implemented as a conditional mixture-density policy that maps target notes and visual context to multimodal robot actions in a single forward pass. Unlike robotic playback systems that merely reproduce user-specified notes, Co-policy generates complementary musical responses under both musical and physical constraints. Real-robot chime experiments, ablations, and expert evaluation show improved intent alignment, execution accuracy, and response frequency over diffusion-policy and ablated baselines, supporting physically grounded action generation as a key requirement for embodied human-AI co-creation.

Humanoid robots are emerging as co-workers in smart manufacturing, yet their dynamic, human-like movements introduce safety risks that differ fundamentally from those of fixed or wheeled robots. Conventional safety paradigms based on reactive force or distance limits fail to capture the sequential, uncertain nature of humanoid failures. This study proposes a precursor-driven, trust-calibrated framework to enable proactive humanoid risk perception. Accident evolution is modeled through sequential precursor cues using a Logistic-Exponential (LE) formulation that couples logistic escalation from diverse precursors with exponential decay for temporal dissipation. Trust is defined as the inverse of the estimated accident probability, allowing humanoids to adapt behavior in real time, reducing aggressiveness when risk intensifies, and restoring confidence as stability returns. A multi-source dataset of 126 documented events and 241 precursors revealed twelve dominant accident modes, most evolving through overlapping cues within one second. A simulated case study ("fall-onto-human") demonstrated how the LE-Trust coupling can trigger early intervention and prevent collapse. The results advance humanoid safety from static thresholds toward dynamic, evidence-based inference, establishing a foundation for risk-aware and trustworthy human-robot collaboration in Industry 5.0 environments.

Effective human-robot teamwork requires robots to adapt to partners, situations, and task dynamics from the start of an interaction. In the MATRX Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) environment, people can externalize collaboration patterns (CPs) they discover during teamwork through a chat and reflection interface. We study whether a robot can use such prior team experience to become a better teammate in future interactions. To this end, we represent historical CPs as knowledge-graph episodic memories and use graph representation learning with a node-classification objective to identify a representative and effective memory for reuse. We then initialize the robot with this memory before a new collaboration episode begins. Across 20 participants and 160 round-level observations, initializing the robot with a single automatically selected prior CP increases rescue success from 25.7% to 41.3% and reduces average task time by 283 seconds. The strongest gains appear at the beginning of interaction, suggesting that reusable episodic memory can help robots enter collaboration with more effective task knowledge and support smoother early teamwork.

Automated AI agents are increasingly capable, yet many scientific and professional tasks require human judgment and contextual expertise. We use simulated shared-workspace human-AI teams as a controlled testbed for studying how collaboration structure shapes team behavior. Using the Collaborative Gym environment with tasks from DiscoveryBench, we vary team compositions and collaboration structures across 1,482 sessions. We find that adding additional collaborators can lower performance when coordination structure is absent. We then evaluate collaboration scaffolding that combines shared group memory with simulated human-in-the-loop (HITL) gates, where selected actions require approval from a designated simulated participant. This scaffolding improves performance, most clearly in three-person teams, with clearer responsibility signals and stronger routing of expertise to team actions. Overall, our results suggest that coordination structure is central to whether available capability improves team outcomes.

Collaborative mobile manipulation requires robots to coordinate with a partially observed partner while physically interacting through shared objects. This is difficult because failures often arise not from poor local skills, but from mistimed waiting, yielding, pulling, releasing, or repositioning. We study this problem with two bimanual mobile manipulators coupled through rigid and deformable objects. We propose Sequential Asymmetric Imitation (SAI), a single-teleoperator curriculum for learning coupled multi-robot behaviors without synchronized dual-operator demonstrations or explicit inter-robot communication. SAI trains Robot A from unilateral demonstrations with a compliant human partner, trains Robot B against the deployed Robot A policy, and then refines Robot A using sparse interventions near coordination failures. This staged process exposes the policies to increasingly realistic partner behaviors, including delay, phase mismatch,insufficient yielding, and interaction conflict. Across real-world dual-robot manipulation tasks, SAI improves task success, phase synchronization, and partner-contingent yielding over independent imitation and curriculum-ablation baselines. These results suggest that physically coupled collaboration can be learned through the structure of the imitation curriculum, rather than through synchronized multi-operator demonstrations or explicit coordination mechanisms. More videos on project page:http://cyc0429.github.io/sai-project-page/

Despite steady advances in flexible automation in sectors such as electronics and automotive manufacturing, apparel automation remains challenging because fabrics are deformable and difficult to manipulate with robots. This paper presents a deployment-oriented case study of a robotic sewing system for denim manufacturing, emphasizing the system-level integration required for practical adoption. At the engineering level, a digital thread module parses DXF production drawings into process parameters and executable robot trajectories, reducing manual programming effort and enabling rapid re-targeting across sewing operations. In parallel, a digital twin of the workcell is used during pre-deployment to validate reach and clearance, refine layout and sequencing, evaluate operator access, and assess cycle-time compatibility with upstream and downstream tasks, thereby reducing commissioning risk. At deployment, the system integrates a collaborative robot with conventional sewing equipment, welding, suction fixtures, and machine-level controllers through an interoperability layer. Runtime monitoring and verification, including seam monitoring, collision checking, and trajectory-level validation, improve robustness under environmental variability, while operator-facing training and guidance tools support setup, troubleshooting, and technology adoption. Two staged factory deployments on denim shorts, covering 2D pocket operations and 3D garment-shaping seams, show that digital-twin-based validation, digital-thread-driven task generation, interoperability, runtime verification, and operator training are important for scaling robotic apparel automation.

Human-robot collaboration (HRC) in prefabricated construction requires planning approaches that consider not only productivity but also time-dependent worker states during repeated work and rest. Existing planning models often rely on simplified assumptions about fatigue, workload, or recovery, with limited domain-specific empirical evidence on how perceived strain evolves. This study develops an empirically grounded, planning-oriented approach to characterize perceived strain accumulation and recovery in prefabricated construction HRC. A controlled repeated work-rest experiment assessed perceived cognitive and physical strain using the Rating Scale for Mental Effort and Borg's Rating of Perceived Exertion. Linear and exponential functional forms were evaluated, followed by mixed-effects modeling to examine collaborative conditions, session effects, and inter-individual variability. Results indicate that cognitive strain accumulation is best represented by a linear mixed-effects model, whereas rest-phase recovery follows nonlinear decay. The resulting planning-oriented models may inform future human-state-aware task allocation and scheduling research.

Open-source social robots offer accessibility, repairability, and student empowerment, yet the build itself often presents a barrier. Existing platforms either ship pre-assembled, foreclosing hands-on learning, or expose students to unfamiliar fasteners, opaque wiring, and inaccessible service points that erode engagement. Whether targeted mechanical redesign can lower this barrier whilst maintaining structural integrity remains untested. Here we show that Design for Assembly (DfA) and Design for Disassembly (DfD) interventions reshape how a build feels before they shorten how long it takes. Working with university students in Guyana and Estonia, we applied the Double Diamond framework to co-create the Robot Study Companion (RSC) v4.1: mapping pain points, then redesigning its chassis around twist-lock fasteners, snap-fit joints, and tool-free service latches. Across two studies with developers and first-time builders, system usability climbed from Poor to Excellent (SUS 59.4 to 89.4), perceived workload trended downward (NASA-TLX 4.29 to 4.00), and mean assembly time trended downward (21.4 to 13.7 minutes, with juniors' learning effect), whilst orientation cues and navigation continuity for first-time builders emerged as the next documentation frontier. Perceived workload, not completion time, appears to govern whether students take up open hardware.

Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) requires strict adherence to safety standards, such as ISO 10218, to prevent harmful interactions. Standard Speed and Separation Monitoring (SSM) filters calculate safe robotic speeds based on conservative assumptions, such as constant human velocity, which prevents accurate predictions of minimum separation distances and causes unnecessary operational halts. This paper proposes a Control Barrier Function (CBF) that explicitly incorporates human acceleration data to analytically forward-predict the minimum human-robot separation distance during a worst-case robotic stopping trajectory. To guarantee safety at the control level, this predictive CBF is integrated as an inequality constraint within a Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) framework. Specifically, two methods are proposed: Method I, a CBF-constrained PD safety filter; and Method II, a task-scaling SQP controller that enforces a spatial tube constraint. Simulated and real-world experiments on a UR10e robot evaluate the two proposed methods against a standard industrial SSM module baseline. Results demonstrate that Method II dynamically modulates execution speed and confines spatial deviations. Compared to Method I, Method II achieves a 63% reduction in mean trajectory error and avoids excessive evasive manoeuvres, ensuring high task throughput while complying with ISO 10218 SSM guidelines.

Quadruped robots are capable of traversing a wide range of complex terrains with high flexibility. As highly mobile ground-based intelligent platforms, they can be equipped with modules for navigation control, environmental perception, and intelligent interaction, thereby serving as real-world mobile deployment platforms for various algorithms. In this paper, we introduce Y-BotFrame, an extensible embodied platform that turns a robot into an intelligent ground assistant. Y-BotFrame integrates multimodal perception capabilities, including speech, vision, and LiDAR, and employs a large language model as the cognitive core for environmental understanding, contextual reasoning, and task planning. The system maps user natural-language instructions into executable embodied task units that can be carried out by the robot. Y-BotFrame supports natural interaction through voice commands and visual feedback, removing the need for a remote controller and enabling efficient human-robot collaboration. With a highly extensible framework, Y-BotFrame supports plug-and-play integration of new functional modules as well as modular upgrades and iterative development, offering a reference implementation for the real-world deployment of general-purpose, instruction-driven embodied agents.The supplementary video is available at https://xdei-group.github.io/Y-BotFrame/.

The handling of flexible materials is a difficult task to fully automate due to the challenges caused by the deformability of these types of objects. Meanwhile, a fully manual process can be ergonomically challenging, tedious and inefficient. Thus, human-robot collaboration (HRC) and cooperative manipulation (co-manipulation) have received increasing interest in this field as they enable human involvement when needed while also improving productivity. To enable efficient co-manipulation and interaction between the human operator and the robot, different modalities and control methods are required. In this paper, we present and examine different control methods for co-manipulation of carbon fiber plies, evaluating the pros and cons of each method in a controlled setting. We propose that a multimodal combination of speech commands, wrist-tracking through vision, and force with compliant control would provide the best solution for complete and intuitive control of the task.

Human-robot collaboration (HRC) combines the complementary strengths of humans and robots to improve task efficiency. However, many existing collaborative systems rely on hand-engineered pipelines, limiting their scalability and flexibility for new tasks. In this work, we show that models trained end-to-end with imitation learning, specifically vision-language-action (VLA) models, can support collaborative manipulation, and characterize the key factors affecting their real-world performance. We evaluate two state-of-the-art models and identify a failure mode of action-chunking policies in implicit HRC, where demonstration action leakage (i.e., action chunks crossing latent task transitions) can cause premature assistive behavior. We find that this issue increases with longer execution horizons and occurs in real-world collaborative VLA systems, such as when a robot attempts to hand over a tool before the person is ready. We propose an inference-time steering method to mitigate these erroneous assistive actions while preserving policy performance. Finally, through a 16-participant user study on a long-horizon collaborative assembly task, we show that steering enables a longer execution horizon while mitigating premature assistance, leading to faster collaboration and fewer failures compared to a shorter-horizon policy.

In assisted teleoperation for human-robot collaboration, accurate intention prediction is critical for enabling timely and reliable robotic assistance during long-horizon manipulation and assembly tasks. These systems require continuous understanding of user behavior to recognize actions, anticipate intentions, and detect mistakes in real time. However, robot teleoperation demonstrations are costly and hardware-limited, whereas human demonstrations are easier to collect and provide rich temporal structure. To address this challenge, we propose an uncertainty-aware human-to-robot intention prediction framework that combines: (1) hierarchical transfer learning, where MS-TCN++ is pretrained on human hand demonstrations and fine-tuned on limited robot teleoperation data to capture low-level actions and high-level task intentions; (2) a conformal prediction module that provides frame-level prediction sets with statistical coverage guarantees for reliable uncertainty quantification and early intention estimation; and (3) VLM-guided segment correction, which selectively reviews low-confidence or temporally uncertain segments using visual and temporal context. The framework supports action recognition, temporal segmentation, intention anticipation, and mistake detection for assisted teleoperation. Experiments on robot assembly demonstrations with 22 action classes show that human-to-robot fine-tuning improves the robot test-set Edit score from 70.50 to 80.70 using only 16 robot demonstrations. Edit-safe VLM correction further improves frame accuracy from 45.21% to 46.42% and increases F1@25 and F1@50 while preserving the Edit score. These results show that human demonstrations provide scalable pretraining data for robust, uncertainty-aware robot action segmentation. Code and data: project website.

Recent advances in LLM agents have enabled complex cognitive capabilities, such as multi-step reasoning, planning, and tool use, that increasingly position these agents as human collaborators. Effective collaboration, however, requires collaborators to continuously maintain and align mental models of their own reasoning,partners' intentions, and shared goals during the collaborative process. Today's agents rarely develop such capabilities since they are primarily optimized for task completion, and the community lacks authentic human collaboration data with action-level mental model annotations that could guide agents toward process-level collaborative competence. To bridge this gap, we present ALMANAC, a dataset of Action-Level Mental model ANnotations for Agent Collaboration built from the Map Task, a classic dyadic routing task from social science. ALMANAC contains 2,987 collaboration actions, each paired with theory-informed mental model annotations that record the participants' self-reasoning, perceived partner intent, and perceived team goal. We benchmark six LLMs on predicting humans' next-turn behavior and mental models. Our results demonstrate ALMANAC's utility in evaluating models' ability to simulate human collaborative behaviors and infer their underlying mental models.

This paper presents a distributed conversational framework for human-robot collaborative manipulation that integrates local language and vision-language models (VLMs) with a Robot Operating System 2 (ROS 2)-based execution stack. Language understanding, visual grounding, orchestration, and motion execution run as separate ROS 2 nodes, enabling flexible deployment across distributed hardware while maintaining a responsive control loop. From free-form user commands, the system generates structured action requests for pick, place, and handover. It uses a VLM to return image-space targets, which are converted into metric robot-frame goals using depth and calibration. A web dashboard exposes intermediate intent and grounding overlays (pixel, depth, and robot-frame) and requires explicit operator confirmation before any motion is executed. Experiments on a Franka FR3 platform evaluate end-to-end task reliability and latency under increasing working table scene ambiguity and compare alternative LLM/VLM configurations in the same pipeline. Code and full documentation are available at github.com/cogrob-tuni/franka-llm.

Safe human--robot collaboration requires more than visual description: a monitor must determine whether the robot body is safely separated, already colliding with the scene or a person, or about to collide. We call this capability collision grounding: binding visual observations to robot body geometry, camera viewpoint, scene layout, human proximity, and temporal motion in order to infer present and imminent contact. We introduce TouchSafeBench, a physics-grounded benchmark for evaluating collision grounding in vision-language models (VLMs). Built in Habitat~3.0, TouchSafeBench contains 2,940 simulated indoor co-presence episodes across social navigation and social rearrangement, with synchronized multi-view RGB-D observations, top-down trajectory maps, calibrated camera metadata, and simulator-derived contact labels. We study two deployment-facing tasks: classifying the current safety state and warning about imminent collision before contact. Across three frontier or robotics-oriented VLMs and nine visual representations, current models remain far from reliable: the best average Macro-F1 stays below 50%, explicit depth is not automatically transformed into robot-body collision evidence, and robot--scene contact is consistently harder than human-contact risk. TouchSafeBench reveals a central limitation of embodied VLMs: visual fluency does not imply physical accountability. Reliable robot safety monitors will need representations that explicitly bind viewpoint, robot morphology, metric geometry, and future collision. We will release the benchmark upon acceptance.

AI systems are fallible, and humans can make mistakes in deciding whether to trust AI over their own judgment. Thus, improving human-AI collaboration requires understanding when, why, and how humans decide to rely on AI. We study two distinct reliance decisions: the delegation choice -- deciding when to let AI act autonomously without knowing its output, and the adoption choice -- evaluating AI suggestions and deciding how to use them. Both of these decoupled reliance patterns shape collaboration, but prior work rarely studies them together in realistic settings with the same users. We address this gap by studying collaborative human--AI teams competing in a question-answering game in which humans can choose when and how to work with AI agents to win. Our 24 matches pair 23 expert humans with 16 AI agents, capturing 387 delegation and 1440 adoption decisions. While human--AI collaboration performs better than either AI or humans alone, humans make suboptimal collaboration decisions, both under-relying on correct AI suggestions (3.9% of opportunities missed) and over-relying when AI misleads them (1.7%). Both parties contribute wrong answers: reported model confidence is near chance when humans and AI disagree, while confirmation bias drives higher under-reliance (64.5%) when an AI suggestion agrees with humans' initial incorrect answer. To close this gap, we recommend calibrated confidence, evidence-grounded explanations, and mechanisms that help users refine trust.

Collaboration is central to human behavior, enabling tasks beyond individual capability. This ability arises from coordinating actions through internal representations of others, a concept known as shared intelligence. Additionally, humans are characterized by physical bodies and cognitive abilities that are optimized in response to their environment, a phenomenon referred to as embodied cognition. Designing humanoid robots that collaborate safely and effectively with people requires unifying these principles. Here we propose an architecture that integrates shared intelligence and embodied cognition to enable robots to physically collaborate with humans, where robot hardware and control are optimized for human metrics, using representations of the human body and motion intelligence. The ultimate goal is to achieve a form of shared embodied intelligence. Specifically, our architecture optimizes robot hardware and physical intelligence parameters with respect to human ergonomic metrics. This is accomplished by modeling human-robot interaction as a function of hardware configurations and embedding human models into the robot's physical intelligence. As a concrete implementation, we present the humanoid robot ergoCub, whose morphology and control have been optimized for collaborative tasks with humans. Our approach provides a framework for designing humanoid robots that prioritize human ergonomics at both the hardware and physical intelligence levels, with applications in industrial and assistive robotics.

Robotic assistants in long-term human-robot collaboration need to assist users under partial observations while leveraging cross-day interaction history. However, human traits and routines are often unknown at the beginning of collaboration, making passive infer-then-act assistance ineffective and inefficient. To address this challenge, we study a cross-day proactive asking setting for continual task assistance and propose PACT (Proactive Asking for Continual Task Assistance), an ask-or-act framework that determines whether clarification should be sought before taking action. PACT leverages current observations together with accumulated interaction history to evaluate contextual sufficiency, enabling the robot to provide more reliable assistance and progressively adapt to the user over time. We implement its primary learned instantiation using reinforcement learning and evaluate alternative instantiations under the same framework. To assess such behavior, we further introduce a clarification utility metric that quantifies the trade-off between assistance accuracy and the frequency of clarification requests. Experiments in multi-day embodied collaboration scenarios demonstrate that, compared with passive inference baselines, PACT consistently improves both assistance accuracy and clarification utility, highlighting the importance of proactive asking in continual human-robot collaboration.

Human-AI collaboration requires agents that can adapt to diverse partner behaviors and skill levels while remaining robust to unseen partners. Existing methods often collapse to a single dominant behavior or learn poorly aligned skills, limiting effective coordination. We propose Intrinsic Action Disentanglement (IAD), a deep hierarchical reinforcement learning (DHRL) framework that learns distinct, partner-aware low-level action sequences conditioned on high-level latent skills. IAD introduces an intrinsic reward that explicitly encourages disentangled action distributions of the agent's low-level policy across skills, yielding an interpretable mapping between high-level decisions and partner-specific behavioral responses. By capturing temporally extended interaction patterns, IAD enables flexible adaptation to heterogeneous partner dynamics under distributional shift. We evaluate IAD in the Overcooked-AI domain across multiple layouts and diverse partner settings, including unseen simulated partners, a human-proxy model trained on human-human gameplay, and real human partners. Results show that IAD consistently outperforms strong baselines and achieves more reliable, adaptive coordination across all settings.

Autonomous systems have achieved superhuman performance in isolation or simulation, yet they remain brittle in shared, dynamic real-world spaces. This failure stems from the dominant single-agent paradigm for physical applications, where other actors are ignored or treated as environmental noise, preventing effective coordination. Here we show that multi-agent reinforcement learning provides the essential safety scaffolding required for real-world interaction. Using high-speed quadrotor racing as a high-stakes testbed, we train agents to navigate complex aerodynamic interactions and strategic maneuvering with a variable number of racers. Through league-based self-play, agents evolve sophisticated anticipatory behaviors, including proactive collision avoidance, overtaking, and handling multi-agent physical interactions, including aerodynamic downwash. Our agents outperform a champion-level human pilot in multi-player races at speeds exceeding 22 m/s, while simultaneously reducing collision rates by 50 % compared to state-of-the-art single-agent baselines. Crucially, training with diverse artificial agents enables zero-shot generalization to safer human interaction. These results suggest that the path to robust robotic co-existence lies not in isolated safety constraints, but in the rigorous demands of multi-agent interaction. Multimedia materials are available at: https://rpg.ifi.uzh.ch/marl

Human-robot collaboration in construction is often challenged by limited robot-to-human communication and the need to adapt to tolerance accumulation arising from material and assembly uncertainties. We present an adaptive human-robot collaborative workflow for masonry construction that addresses communication limitations and tolerance accumulation, demonstrated through a brickwork case study in which a robot places bricks while a human applies adhesive. This workflow is enabled by two complementary mechanisms: 1) an end-effector-mounted projector that provides spatially registered, just-in-time projection guidance for manual adhesive application, and 2) laser scanning for feedback-driven grasping and placement pose correction. Together, these mechanisms enable adjustment of human and robotic actions in response to material variability and accumulated assembly tolerances. Full-scale experiments across conventional running-bond and nonstandard configurations demonstrate that projection guidance improves adhesive application consistency and reduces application time, while laser-based correction maintains level courses and avoids collision-prone failures associated with open-loop execution. These results indicate that integrating spatial projection with feedback-driven adaptation, enabled by material and as-built sensing, can mitigate tolerance accumulation and improve precision and robustness in human-robot collaborative construction.

Human-robot collaboration (HRC) can benefit from robots' abilities to interpret human emotional states. However, current emotion recognition (ER) models in HRC often fall short, particularly due to their reliance on acted datasets and single-modality inputs like facial expressions. We propose a novel vision language model (VLM)-based ER system that leverages contextual understanding to improve emotion interpretation in HRC. We first evaluate the VLM-ER system by assessing its semantic and sentiment similarity with human annotations on an existing HRC dataset. Then, in a user study with a service robot in a collaborative delivery task, we evaluate the effects of modulating the robot's behaviour based on the user's emotional state inferred by the VLM-ER system. The results show that the proposed VLM-ER system achieves higher semantic similarity and positive sentiment alignment with human annotations compared to a baseline convolutional neural network-based system. Further, participants in the user study preferred emotion-adaptive robot behaviour facilitated by the VLM-ER system.

As robots become increasingly integrated into everyday environments, intuitive communication paradigms such as natural language and end-user programming have become indispensable for specifying autonomous robot behavior. However, these mechanisms are ineffective at fully capturing user intent: natural language is imprecise and ambiguous, whereas end-user programming can be overly specific. As a result, understanding what users truly mean when they interact with robots remains a central challenge for human-AI communication systems. To address this issue, we propose the Distill approach for human-robot communication interfaces. Given a task specification provided by the user, Distill (1) removes unnecessary steps; (2) generalizes the meaning behind individual steps; and (3) relaxes ordering constraints between steps. We implemented Distill on a web interface and, through a crowdsourcing study, demonstrated its ability to elicit and refine user intent from initial task specifications.