English

Pattern languages are a classical model in formal language theory and algorithmic learning theory. This note formulates the problem of computing the inclusion depth of a pattern language: the length of the longest strict inclusion chain from the universal pattern language to the language generated by a given pattern. Inclusion depth captures the mind-change complexity of pattern identification from positive data. The central open question is whether the inclusion depth ID_Sigma(p) is computable for every pattern p over every finite alphabet Sigma with at least two symbols, and whether it is computable in polynomial time. A simple conjectured formula, ID_Sigma(p) = 2|p| - #var(p) - 1, would imply a linear-time algorithm. The problem connects pattern language inclusion, combinatorics on words, language identification in the limit, and mind-change-bounded learning.

In this paper, we introduce LLMBridge, a new LLM based system for the task of end-to-end referential bridging resolution in English. Our bridging resolution pipeline combines heuristic pre/post-processing with the natural language inference ability that comes from LLMs. We evaluate our bridging resolution pipeline on three datasets which have been used for referential bridging resolution evaluation in English: ISNotes, BASHI, and GUMBridge. Comparison to previous bridging resolution systems shows that the performance of LLMBridge surpasses previous state-of-the-art (SoTA) systems for all 3 datasets in the challenging End-to-end Evaluation Setting, as well as the Basic Bridging Resolution Evaluation Setting (gold bridging anaphor given). We also conduct a thorough error analysis of the LLMBridge performance, examining what varieties of bridging remain difficult for LLM based systems to identify. With this paper, we release the code for the LLMBridge pipeline.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have emerged as a dominant paradigm for efficient LLM scaling, yet adapting them to non-English downstream tasks remains challenging. Existing fine-tuning approaches treat MoE models as monolithic learners, ignoring the heterogeneous routing structure that develops during pretraining. We validate across multiple MoE models and downstream tasks that middle layers form a language-universal alignment zone where routing divergence strongly predicts per-language task performance gaps. Building on this observation, we propose RA-MoE (Routing-Aligned MoE Fine-Tuning), a three-stage framework that categorizes parallel task examples into a four-way taxonomy (cc/ci/ic/ii) based on correctness in English and the target language, identifies task-relevant experts in the middle layers, and augments standard SFT with a routing alignment loss that encourages target-language routing on ci-type examples to follow the English task-expert activation pattern. Experiments across three MoE models, three tasks, and six target languages demonstrate that RA-MoE consistently outperforms standard SFT and strong baselines including Routing Steering and RISE, with the ci proportion of a task-language pair serving as a reliable predictor of alignment benefit.

Multilingual Large Language Models (mLLMs) leaderboards report per-language accuracy but rarely explain why disparities emerge, leaving systemic biases unattributed and offering practitioners no actionable levers. We first establish that these gaps are systematic rather than artifacts of sampling noise via distribution-free Friedman and Kruskal--Wallis tests, then introduce a two-step Bayesian hierarchical framework that decomposes multilingual performance variance into interpretable components. First, isolating the variance attributable to language identity, we show that observable language features (script, family, typological distance) explain $R^2_{\text{ling}} = 79\%$ of this variance on understanding tasks and $92\%$ on reasoning, with a model's internal representational similarity to English emerging as the dominant predictor across both task buckets. Second, decomposing the full (model$\times$benchmark$\times$language) cube, we find that NLU and reasoning have fundamentally divergent variance profiles: model identity dominates understanding ($66.7\%$ of variance), whereas the benchmark$\times$model interaction dominates reasoning ($46.3\%$). Together these results recast multilingual evaluation from passive performance mapping into an explainable, diagnostic framework with concrete levers for targeting the root drivers of language disparity.

Driven by the wave of large language models, Video-Language Models (VLMs) have become a significant yet challenging technology to bridge the gap between videos and texts. Although previous VLM works have made significant progress, almost all of them implicitly assume that all the texts are predefined by the specific template. In real-world applications, such a strict assumption is impossible to satisfy since 1) predefining all the texts is extremely time-consuming and labor-intensive. 2) these predefined text inputs are too restrictive and user-unfriendly, limiting their applications. It is observed that given a video input, texts with similar semantics but different templates lead to various performances. To this end, in this paper, we propose a novel plug-and-play framework for various VLM-based methods to fully bridge videos and texts. Specifically, we first generate positive and negative texts from the original ones to target specific text components. Then, we propose an attribute-based text reasoning strategy to mine fine-grained textual semantics of generated texts. Finally, we utilize videos as guidance to conduct cross-modal bridging by designing a self-weighted loss. Extensive experiments show that the proposed method can serve as the plug-and-play module to effectively improve the performance of state-of-the-art VLMs.

Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring has been proposed as a promising safety mechanism for detecting misaligned behavior in large language models. However, its reliability remains largely unexplored beyond English and across diverse model families. We present the first large-scale evaluation of CoT monitorability across 13 diverse languages and seven frontier model families, comprising 16 models. Using adversarial-hint evaluations that require explicit intermediate computation, together with analysis of internal answer-token probabilities, we consistently find CoT unfaithfulness across languages and hint types, with an average rate of 95.9% across 8B--120B parameter models. We find that frontier models systematically engage in strategic manipulation, including answer-switching, post-hoc rationalization, and procedural exploitation of hints, making external monitors struggle to detect deception. We show that frontier models often commit to the misaligned cue in their latent activations within the first 15% of generation, even when the CoT appears faithful. Surprisingly, these deceptive patterns remain 100% in low-resource languages, revealing fundamental limitations in current CoT-based oversight. Our results reveal that CoT monitoring is fundamentally fragile under linguistic distribution shift, providing a substantially weaker safety signal than what English-only studies suggest. These findings underscore an urgent need to develop robust CoT monitors and to accelerate research into white-box monitoring techniques, especially to improve CoT monitorability in mid- and low-resource languages. Our code is available \href{https://multilingual-cot-monitoring.github.io/}{\textcolor{blue}{here}}.

Generative translation systems are cultural technologies because they decide how socially meaningful cues are rendered within culturally specific grammatical systems. We study one concrete notion of successful cultural translation: when an English source explicitly encodes gender, an English-to-Hindi translation should preserve the recoverability of that cue unless the source itself is ambiguous. We evaluate this criterion on a 37,345-instance benchmark spanning twelve categories and show that five systems frequently erase gender through ergative and honorific constructions. We then introduce two mechanism-aware inference-time interventions. The first, the Source-Aware Reranker (SAR), prefers candidates that avoid gender-neutralizing syntax. The second, the Phenomenon-Aware Reranker (PAR), preserves gender through targeted lexical marking even when ergative syntax remains. Across GPT-4o-mini and Sarvam, PAR improves target-subset accuracy from 11.07% to 54.47% and from 15.99% to 49.66%, respectively. Human evaluation shows that PAR increases gender preservation from 10.3% to 81.3%, but reduces mean fluency from 4.36 to 3.37. These findings place the two interventions on a preservation and fluency frontier rather than supporting a single dominant solution, and show how culturally situated generation can require explicit tradeoffs among fidelity, fluency, and stylistic naturalness.

Recent reasoning Large Language Models produce a chain-of-thought (CoT) predominantly in English, even when prompted in non-English languages. Prior work suggests that forcing the CoT to remain in the input language (\emph{native reasoning}) substantially degrades performance relative to allowing the model to reason in English before answering in the input language (\emph{English-pivoted reasoning}). However, most studies of this native reasoning gap rely on inference-time interventions or limited native-language training data. We revisit this comparison at a larger scale and under comparable supervision. We construct long multilingual reasoning datasets across six languages (English, French, German, Spanish, Chinese and Swahili); fine-tune specialists in both native and English-pivoted regimes on top of \texttt{Qwen/Qwen3-8B-Base}, and evaluate across mathematics, science, general knowledge, and code. In this setting, the average native reasoning gap shrinks to 1.9--3.5% across the five non-English languages, considerably smaller than previously reported. Weight-space analysis of the native specialists reveals aligned fine-tuning updates in the middle layers and divergence in the outer layers. This points to a largely language-agnostic reasoning core surrounded by language-specific layers. Exploiting this structure, we introduce a Layer Swap: transferring the English specialist's stronger reasoning mid-layers into each native specialist, closing most of the native reasoning gap across the five non-English languages while preserving CoT in the target language. We release all models and datasets.

Large language models (LLMs) learn undesirable properties during pretraining, including dangerous knowledge and toxic text generation. Just as post-training uses different objectives to shape different behaviors, we argue that unlearning methods should be designed for the language function at issue. To study this, we consider two mechanistically distinct unlearning goals, dangerous-knowledge unlearning and toxicity unlearning. For dangerous knowledge, we introduce a cosine-based, meta-learned variant of RMU. For toxicity, we propose a multi-layer objective based on layer-specific probe directions. Across four open-source 7-8B models, our methods achieve strong results, based on distinct training objectives for the two types of unlearning. Overall, our results suggest that unlearning should be studied as a family of problems, analogous to the multiple types of LLM post-training.

Automated Essay Scoring (AES) for English proficiency assessment increasingly relies on pretrained transformer models, yet these models are typically trained on general-domain English and may under-represent second-language learner writing. This study investigates whether domain-adaptive continued pretraining (DAPT) on a learner-writing corpus improves transformer-based AES for English proficiency assessment. We perform DAPT on BERT, RoBERTa, and DistilBERT using the EFCAMDAT corpus, then compare the adapted models with their original checkpoints on two English proficiency test datasets, FCE and IELTS, in both in-domain scoring and few-shot cross-dataset transfer. Full-corpus DAPT produces mixed effects across models, datasets, and metrics. Subsequent lexical and syntactic analyses suggest mismatches between EFCAMDAT and the downstream datasets in proficiency level, genre, and communicative purpose. We therefore repeat DAPT using proficiency-specific EFCAMDAT subsets across all three encoder architectures. Proficiency-specific DAPT frequently outperforms full-corpus DAPT and, in some settings, even the non-adapted baseline. Overall, continued pretraining on learner writing can improve in-domain AES, but its benefits depend on both the proficiency composition of the pretraining data and the underlying encoder architecture, and do not consistently extend to cross-test transfer.

Large language models~(LLMs) are trained on heterogeneous multilingual corpora, yet existing policy optimization methods often implicitly restrict each training question to a single response language or rely on a fixed dominant language for supervision. We propose language-routed policy optimization (LRPO), an online policy optimization framework that treats language as a selectable variable. LRPO elicits multilingual rollouts for each training question and integrates their relative quality into preference-based policy updates, increasing the diversity and informativeness of training signals under the fixed rollout budget. To adaptively determine which languages to explore during reinforcement learning, we introduce a trainable language router formulated as a multi-armed bandit, balancing exploration of underutilized languages with exploitation of more informative ones. Extensive experiments show that LRPO consistently improves multilingual performance, demonstrating that adaptive language routing enables effective cross-lingual knowledge exploitation for training. We release all the resources at https://github.com/Guochry/LRPO.

AI agents now participate as first-class team members across the software development lifecycle, yet no specification language exists for expressing the human-agent responsibility boundaries, approval gates, and governance constraints this collaboration requires. Existing approaches encode process in agent prompts (subject to drift), target adjacent domains (workflow management, business processes), or address only fragments (access control, approval gates). We propose a domain-specific language for specifying AI-SDLC processes as protocols, with formal syntax, well-formedness conditions, operational semantics, and enforcement invariants. The language distinguishes policy (declared intent) from mechanism (structural enforcement), enabling implementations to bound process non-determinism through primitives such as validation tokens and capability boundaries. Three results follow. A failure rate analysis shows that structural enforcement bounds system failure rates at a weighted product of agent and validator rates, while behavioral compliance permits cumulative or near-saturating growth. The 2+N team pattern (two human-in-control roles plus N specialized agent members) formalizes classical Separation of Duties for AI-SDLC. Kleene closure of orchestration loops and reflexive protocol-adherence validation emerge as design properties rather than special-case constructs. We position the contribution against multi-agent frameworks (MetaGPT), workflow specification (FlowAgent, BPMN extensions), and capability-based security (SAGA): the novelty lies in the specific integration, not any single primitive. A working implementation demonstrates feasibility; empirical evaluation is future work.

Legal NLP benchmarks evaluate models on randomly split data, implicitly assuming that legal language is stationary. We test this assumption by fine-tuning four transformer encoders -- XLM-RoBERTa (base and large) and their legal-domain variants -- on Ukrainian court decisions from three temporal epochs defined by geopolitical disruptions: pre-war (2008-2013), hybrid war (2014-2021), and full-scale invasion (2022-2026). Each model is trained on one epoch and evaluated on all three, producing a 3x3 cross-temporal generalization matrix. Four findings emerge. (1) Forward degradation is severe: models trained on pre-war data lose up to 27.2 percentage points of macro-F1 when applied to full-scale invasion era decisions. (2) The degradation is asymmetric: backward transfer (full-scale to pre-war) is substantially more robust than forward transfer, consistent with the hypothesis that legal language is additive. (3) Legal-domain pretraining (Legal-XLM-R) does not improve absolute performance but reduces forward degradation magnitude and asymmetry. (4) Chronological continual learning eliminates catastrophic forgetting for general XLM-R: pre-war knowledge is fully retained (+1.8 to +6.2 pp) while full-scale performance gains +16.5 to +19.0 pp; reverse-chronological training causes severe forgetting. Cross-jurisdictional pretraining on Swiss Judgment Prediction data improves absolute performance but does not reduce temporal degradation magnitude, confirming that temporal drift is an intrinsic property of legal language evolution. The dataset (428K decisions across three epochs) is publicly available as a LEXTREME contribution.

Brain-LLM alignment is well established in English, yet the brain's language network is neuroanatomically universal across languages. Does alignment also generalize cross-linguistically, and what governs the variation? We test this using fMRI data from 112 participants across English, Chinese, and French (the Le Petit Prince corpus) and seven LLMs spanning English-dominant, Chinese-dominant, and multilingual architectures. Our central finding is that training-language dominance, not an inherent property of English, drives the alignment pattern: a Chinese-dominant model (Baichuan2-7B), architecture-matched to LLaMA-2-7B, reverses the gradient entirely, aligning best with Chinese brains and worst with English. Beyond training dominance, formal typological distance independently covaries with alignment degradation, syntax-associated brain regions (IFG) show $2.3\times$ steeper typological gradients than lexico-semantic regions (PTL), and tokenization fertility accounts for $\sim$60% of a cross-linguistic shift in optimal encoding layer. These results reveal that the apparent "English advantage" in brain-LLM alignment is an artifact of training data composition, while the remaining variation reflects genuine typological structure concentrated in syntactic processing.

Reinforcement learning has proven effective for enhancing multi-step reasoning in large language models (LLMs), yet its benefits have not fully translated to multilingual contexts. Existing methods struggle with a fundamental trade-off: prioritizing input-language consistency severely hampers reasoning quality, while prioritizing reasoning often leads to unintended language drift toward English. We address this challenge with LANG, a novel framework that leverages language-conditioned hints to guide exploration in non-English reasoning tasks. Our method incorporates two key mechanisms to prevent dependency on these hints: a progressive decay schedule that gradually withdraws scaffolding, and a language-adaptive switch that tailors learning horizons to specific language difficulties. Empirical results on challenging multilingual mathematical benchmarks reveal that LANG substantially enhances reasoning performance without compromising language consistency. Moreover, we show that our framework generalizes beyond mathematics, fostering more consistent language alignment across model layers

In recent years social media has become an increasingly popular tool for communication. People use it to share their ideas, exchange information, and discuss thoughts. Given its prevalence and widespread reach, social media must remain a safe space for people. Content generated on social media can be abusive and it has become increasingly important to detect such content. In this paper, we use a language-based preprocessing and an ensemble of several models and analyze their performance of abusive comment detection. Through extensive experimentation, we propose a pipeline that minimizes the false-positive rate (marking non-abusive as abusive) so that these systems can detect abusive comments without undermining the freedom of expression.

Driving Vision-Language-Action Models (Driving VLAs) commonly introduce natural-language reasoning as an intermediate interface for end-to-end planning, but reasoning-centric interfaces face three practical bottlenecks: obtaining high-quality reasoning annotations is difficult, generating and understanding long reasoning chains is challenging for compact models, and inference latency is substantially increased. In this paper, we rethink the design of language interfaces in Driving VLAs and show that concise one-step meta-actions are a simple yet effective alternative to verbose reasoning. Meta-actions provide semantic decision grounding while remaining low-entropy, and being automatically derivable from expert trajectories, enabling scalable supervision and reliable trajectory conditioning. Building on this interface, we propose DriveMA, which combines action-centric supervised training with a turn-level credit-assignment reinforcement learning framework that jointly optimizes meta-action correctness, trajectory quality, and trajectory--meta-action consistency. Experiments show that DriveMA already achieves a new state of the art on the Waymo End-to-End Driving Challenge with a 2B model, reaching a Rater Feedback Score (RFS) of 8.060, while its 4B version further improves the state of the art to 8.079; DriveMA also obtains competitive performance on NAVSIM. Ablations demonstrate that one-step meta-actions offer a better practical trade-off between expressiveness, predictability, and inference efficiency than natural-language reasoning or finer-grained action sequences. Code, data, and models will be released to facilitate future research.

In what ways might statistical signals in linguistic input assist with the acquisition of syntax? Here we hypothesize a mechanism called collocational bootstrapping, in which regularities in word co-occurrence patterns can provide cues to syntactic dependencies. We investigate whether this mechanism can support the acquisition of English subject-verb agreement. First, we simulate language acquisition by training neural networks on synthetic datasets that vary in how predictable their subject-verb pairings are. We find that there is a range of variability levels at which these statistical learners robustly learn subject-verb agreement. We then analyze the variability of subject-verb pairings in child-directed language, and we find that the variability in such data falls within the range that supported robust generalization in our computational simulations. Taken together, these results suggest that collocational bootstrapping is a viable learning strategy for the type of input that children receive.

CHILDES is a paramount resource for language acquisition studies -- yet computational tools for analyzing its syntactic structure remain limited. Leveraging the recent release of the UD-English-CHILDES treebank with gold-standard Universal Dependencies (UD) annotations, we train a state-of-the-art dependency parser specifically tailored to CHILDES. The parser more accurately captures syntactic patterns in child-adult interactions, outperforming widely used off-the-shelf English parsers, including SpaCy and Stanza. Alongside the parser, we also release a Part-of-Speech tagger and an utterance-level construction tagger, which together form the open-source Syntactic Parsing Toolkit for Child-Adult InTeractions (CAIT). Through a detailed error analysis and a case study tracking the distribution of syntactic constructions across developmental time in CHILDES, we demonstrate the practical utility of the toolkit for large-scale, reproducible research on language acquisition.

The rapid emergence of AI technologies is reshaping translation practices and theory across the board. This paper deals with the impact of AI in language access. This area is characterized by the need to serve broad and diverse user populations, within a context where efficiency and access are shaped by legal mandates, ethical and commercial tensions, and safety concerns. This paper reports on the attitudes and perceptions of language access managers towards the AI and the human value in the AI age. Methodologically, this paper presents an analysis of a subset of a broader study on language access and technology, specifically a qualitative thematic analysis of ten semi-structured interviews with language access managers in the USA working in healthcare, court, public service and local government contexts. The results indicate that language access managers show conditional optimism towards the inevitable AI implementations, are strongly risk aware, and deeply committed to the human value and human oversight of AI implementations and output.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored for clinical decision support, yet most evaluations are conducted in English, leaving their reliability in other languages uncertain. Here we evaluate the impact of prompting language on diagnostic reasoning and final diagnosis accuracy by comparing English and French performance across five LLMs (o3, DeepSeek-R1, GPT-4-Turbo, Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct, and BioMistral-7B). A total of 180 clinical vignettes covering 16 medical specialties were assessed by two physicians using an 18-point scale evaluating both diagnosis accuracy and reasoning quality. Four of the five models performed better in English (mean difference 0.37-0.91, adjusted p < 0.05), with the gap spanning multiple aspects of reasoning, including differential diagnosis, logical structure, and internal validity. o3 was the only model showing no overall language effect. These findings demonstrate that prompting language remains a critical determinant of LLM clinical performance, with implications for equitable linguistico-cultural deployment worldwide.

Code-switching -- the natural alternation between two languages within a single utterance -- remains one of the most challenging and under-studied conditions for automatic speech recognition (ASR). We present a benchmark evaluating five commercial ASR providers across four language pairs: Egyptian Arabic--English, Saudi Arabic (Najdi/Hijazi)--English, Persian (Farsi)--English, and German--English, comprising 300 samples per pair selected by a two-stage pipeline combining heuristic filtering with a GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro ensemble scorer, reducing LLM costs by $\approx$91%. We evaluate on both WER and BERTScore, showing that while both metrics agree on the ordinal ranking of systems for all Arabic and Persian pairs ($τ= 1.0$), WER inflates the magnitude of quality gaps by approximately 3$\times$ by penalising semantically correct transliteration choices. ElevenLabs Scribe v2 achieves the lowest WER (13.2% overall) and leads on BERTScore (0.936 overall). Difficulty-stratified analysis reveals performance gaps masked by aggregate averages, and BERT embedding projections confirm semantic proximity between reference and hypothesis despite surface-level script differences. The dataset is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Perle-ai/ASR_Code_Switch.

Power differences shape human communication through well documented socio cognitive effects, including language coordination, pronoun usage, authority bias, and harmful compliance. We examine whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit similar behaviors when assigned high or low status personas. Using personas from diverse professions, we simulate multi turn, power asymmetric dialogues (e.g., principal teacher, justice lawyer) and measure (i) language coordination, (ii) pronoun usage, (iii) persuasion success, and (iv) compliance with unsafe requests. Our results show that LLMs show key socio-cognitive effects of power, albeit with nuances and variability, linking simulated interactions to both desirable and unsafe behaviors.

Manner and result verbs encode different aspects of event structure and have been discussed in developmental work as a potentially informative distinction for studying early verb learning. However, this distinction remains difficult to measure at scale because large annotated resources for manner and result classification are not currently available. We present a computational approach for identifying manner and result verbs in sentence context. Using linguistically informed prompts, we generate sentence-level annotations with large language models over data drawn from MASC and InterCorp, extending coverage from previously annotated portions of VerbNet to 436 classes. We then train a RoBERTa-based classifier on these annotations and evaluate it on three held-out gold-standard datasets, including previously annotated items and a new expert-annotated set. Across these evaluations, the model shows promising performance, with average accuracy up to 89.6%. We present this work as a scalable measurement tool that can support future research on verb semantics in developmental and other language datasets, while noting that further validation is needed for borderline cases, mixed manner/result verbs, and downstream developmental applications.

Through an analysis of sequences generated by open-weight large language models (LLMs), we demonstrate that LLMs are heavily biased toward English. While continual pre-training is commonly used to adapt LLMs to a target language, we show that it does not offer a cost advantage over training from scratch, even for improving cultural understanding in the target language. These findings suggest that dedicated per-language investment may become increasingly important for future LLM development, rather than relying primarily on the expansion of English-centric resources.

Financial decision-making in multilingual settings demands accurate numerical reasoning grounded in diverse modalities, yet existing benchmarks largely overlook this high-stakes, real-world challenge, especially for Indic languages. We introduce FinVQA, a benchmark for evaluating financial numerical and multimodal reasoning in multilingual Indic contexts. FinVQA spans English, Hindi, Bengali, Marathi, Gujarati, and Tamil, and comprises 18,900 samples across 14 financial domains. The dataset captures diverse reasoning paradigms under realistic constraints, and is structured across three difficulty levels (easy, moderate, hard) and four question formats: multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, table matching, and true/false. To address these challenges, we propose FIND, a framework that combines supervised fine-tuning with constraint-aware decoding to promote faithful numerical reasoning, robust multimodal grounding, and structured decision-making. Together, FinVQA and FIND establish a rigorous evaluation and modeling paradigm for high-stakes multilingual multimodal financial reasoning.

Meta-learning has been shown to have better performance than supervised learning for few-shot monolingual spoken word classification. However, the meta-learning approach remains under-explored in multilingual spoken word classification. In this paper, we apply the Generative Meta-Continual Learning algorithm to spoken word classification. The generative nature of this algorithm makes it viable for use in application, and the meta-learning aspect promotes generalisation, which is crucial in a multilingual setting. We train monolingual models on English, German, French, and Catalan, a bilingual model on English and German, and a multilingual model on all four languages. We find that although the multilingual model performs best, the differences between model performance is unexpectedly low. We also find that the hours of unique data seen during training seems to be a stronger performance indicator than the number of languages included in the training data.

Is child-directed language (CDL) optimized to support language learning, and which aspects of linguistic development does it facilitate? We investigate this question using neural language models trained on CDL versus adult-directed language (ADL). We selectively remove syntactic or lexical co-occurrence information from the model training data, and evaluate the impact of these manipulations on verb meaning acquisition. While disrupting syntax impairs learning across all datasets, models trained on CDL and spoken ADL show significantly higher resilience than those trained on written input. Tracking semantic and syntactic performance over training, we observe a semantic-first trajectory, with verb meanings emerging prior to robust syntactic proficiency, an asynchrony most pronounced in the spoken domain, especially CDL. These results suggest that the advantage for verb learning previously attributed to CDL may instead reflect broader properties of the spoken register, rather than a uniquely CDL-specific optimization.

Semantic segmentation of code written in a C-family language remains a challenging problem, due to the language's complex syntax, macro expansion, and irregular structural patterns. Existing chunking methods, such as fixed-sized windows, heuristic splitting, and syntax-based tools, often fail to capture meaningful functional units, limiting the efficacy of retrieval and other downstream LLM driven tasks. In this paper, we address the problem of chunking in C-related languages. First, we define a set of code chunk categories. Second, we train an LLM-based classifier to a) identify chunk boundaries, and b) assign each chunk a descriptive functional attribute (a category), which can be useful for downstream tasks. By leveraging the LLM's ability to capture semantic context within the code, we assume flexible chunk boundaries, allowing to adapt to the specific structure and context of each instance. Third, we introduce SemChunk-C, a family of lightweight language models for semantic chunking of C-related files (.c, .cpp, .h, .cs, etc.). These models are based on the first four Ettin encoders [1] with 17M, 32M, 68M, and 150M parameters. Despite their relatively small size, they are capable of identifying cohesive code units, such as data structures, interface blocks, and other components. Furthermore, we demonstrate the robustness of our approach on real-world code, including challenging constructs such as nested definitions and macros. We test our approach on various datasets, and show that it achieves high boundary accuracy and semantic coherence, matching or outperforming chunkers that are based on much larger code-oriented LLMs. We also validate the improved performance of the downstream tasks on a few curated benchmarks.

Multiword expressions (MWEs) are a heterogeneous set with a glaring need for classifications. Designing a satisfactory classification involves choosing features. In the case of MWEs, many features are a priori available. Not all features are equal in terms of how reliably MWEs can be assigned to classes. Accordingly, resulting classifications may be more or less fruitful for computational use. I outline an enhanced classification. In order to increase its suitability for many languages, I use previous works taking into account various languages.

Native Language Identification (NLI) is the task of determining an author's native language (L1) from their non-native writings. With the advent of human-AI co-authorship, non-native texts are routinely corrected and rewritten by large language models, fundamentally altering the linguistic features NLI models depend on. In this paper, we investigate the robustness of L1 traces across increasing degrees of editorial intervention. By processing 450 essays from the Write & Improve 2024 corpus through varying levels of grammatical error correction (GEC) and paraphrasing, we demonstrate that L1 attribution does not entirely depend on surface-level errors. Instead, the detection models leverage deeper L1 features: unidiomatic lexico-semantic choices, pragmatic transfer, and the author's underlying cultural perspective. We find that minimal edits preserve these structural traces and maintain high profiling accuracy. In contrast, fluency edits and paraphrasing normalize these L1 features, leading to a severe degradation in performance.

We present Version 2 of system Cplus2ASP, which implements the definite fragment of action language C+. Its input language is fully compatible with the language of the Causal Calculator Version 2, but the new system is significantly faster thanks to modern answer set solving techniques. The translation implemented in the system is a composition of several recent theoretical results. The system orchestrates a tool chain, consisting of f2lp, clingo, iclingo, and as2transition. Under the incremental execution mode, the system translates a C+ description into the input language of iclingo, exploiting its incremental grounding mechanism. The correctness of this execution is justified by the module theorem extended to programs with nested expressions. In addition, the input language of the system has many useful features, such as external atoms by means of Lua calls and the user interactive mode. The system supports extensible multi-modal translations for other action languages, such as B and BC, as well.

Multilingual vision-language models exhibit systematic performance gaps across languages, but the mechanism remains ambiguous: cross-language divergence could arise from the visual encoder, the text branch, or their interaction. We resolve this ambiguity through a dense multilingual CLIP probe in which the visual encoder is held identical across thirteen typologically diverse languages and only the XLM-RoBERTa text branch varies. We evaluate two CLIP architectures spanning a 7x visual-encoder scale gap (XLM-R base + ViT-B/32, ~87M visual parameters; XLM-R large + ViT-H/14, ~632M) on 11 concepts and 210 images, and quantify cross-language agreement via cluster-mask IoU, top-percentile IoU, and Spearman rank correlation against an English reference (n=2,310 paired observations per language). Three findings emerge. First, low-resource languages (Arabic, Basque, Luxembourgish) incur a structural penalty at both backbone scales (Wilcoxon HR>LR p<10^-300; cluster-mask IoU gap +0.114 at base, +0.143 at large), isolating the deficit to the text branch. Second, scaling the encoder 7x widens the gap for structural failure cases (Basque Δ=-0.056, Luxembourgish Δ=-0.076) while improving Arabic (Δ=+0.033), separating corpus-coverage from tokeniser-fertility failures. Third, peak similarity is preserved across languages (mean ratio 0.94 at large scale) while cluster-mask IoU drops sharply, identifying spatial misalignment, not signal collapse, as the dominant failure mode. At 3.4-3.9 Wh per 1,000 queries, dense-CLIP grounding is competitive with high-throughput inference budgets, positioning it as a practical substrate for energy-aware multilingual deployment.

Lexical difficulty prediction is a fundamental problem in language learning and readability assessment, requiring models to estimate word difficulty across different first-language (L1) backgrounds. However, existing approaches rely on regression-only training with scalar supervision, which does not explicitly structure the representation space, limiting their ability to capture cross-lingual alignment and ordinal difficulty. To mitigate these issues, we propose Context-Aligned Contrastive Regression, which integrates Ridge regression ensemble with two complementary objectives, i.e., Cross-View Context and Ordinal Soft Contrastive Learning. Experiments on three L1 datasets show that (i) contrastive objectives improve cross-lingual representation alignment while preserving language-specific nuances, (ii) the learned representations capture the ordinal structure of lexical difficulty, and (iii) the ensemble effectively mitigates systematic biases of individual models, leading to more stable performance across difficulty levels.

This paper is concerned with what intermediate syntactic categories children acquire during first language development, and in what order. Maturational theories make different predictions. Bottom-up accounts (GROWING) propose that lexical and inflectional structure emerges first, while inward accounts (INWARD) predict early access to discourse-related categories. We computationally operationalise these hypotheses of staged syntactic emergence using statistical grammar induction, asking what each proposed ordering makes learnable when input and learning algorithm are held constant. Our framework makes category acquisition explicit and allows us to explore how different maturational orderings shape the structure that can be learned under identical conditions. Based on this operationalisation, the GROWING account significantly outperforms the INWARD account across three evaluation metrics.

How to achieve vision-language (VL) tracking using natural language descriptions from a video sequence \textbf{without relying on any bounding-box ground truth}? In this work, we achieve this goal by tackling \textit{self-supervised VL tracking}, which aims to evaluate tracking capabilities guided by natural language descriptions. We introduce \textbf{\tracker}, a novel self-supervised VL tracker that is capable of tracking any referred object by a language description. Unlike traditional methods that equally fuse all language and visual tokens, we propose an efficient Dynamic Token Aggregation Module, which treats each visual token \textbf{unequally}. The module consists of three main steps: i) Based on an anchor token, it selects multiple important target tokens from the template frame. ii) The selected target tokens are merged according to their attention scores and aggregated into the language tokens, thereby eliminating redundant visual token noise and enhancing semantic alignment. iii) Finally, the fused language tokens serve as guiding signals to extract potential target tokens from the search frame and propagate them to subsequent frames, enhancing temporal prompts and encouraging the tracker to autonomously learn instance tracking from unlabeled videos. This new modeling approach enables the effective self-supervised learning of language-guided tracking representations without the need for large-scale bounding box annotations. Extensive experiments on VL tracking benchmarks show that {\tracker} surpasses SOTA self-supervised methods.

Emerging digital technologies are exacerbating the existing divide in Open Access Data (OAD) between high-and low-resource languages, excluding many communities from participating in the global digital transformation. In this PhD proposal, we aim to address this gap, focusing on the language coverage of Linked Open Data knowledge graphs (LOD KGs). First, we identify key variables that characterize language distribution in LOD, including the number of Wikipedia articles per language edition and the number of language-tagged entities in LOD KGs. These variables are analyzed across three major multilingual LOD KGs, DBpedia, BabelNet, and Wikidata, providing insights into the representation and distribution of languages within LOD. Building on this analysis, we intend to study the impact of cross-lingual transfer candidate selection on the task of multilingual KG completion. In particular, we plan to investigate strategies based on linguistic proximity and the availability of curated annotated alignments between languages. Language proximity also motivates us to explore the benefits of analogical reasoning that relies on (dis)similarities and has not yet been investigated to identify correspondences across languages to improve KG completion performance and enhance language coverage in LOD.

AI systems increasingly synthesize executable structure at runtime: LLMs generate programs, agents construct workflows,self-improving systems modify their own behavior. In classical homoiconic and staged languages, the transition from code representation to execution is unrestricted. eval is a language primitive, not a governed operation. We argue that in governed intelligent systems, this transition is an authority amplification: it converts symbolic structure into executable authority and must be mediated like any other effect. We present governed metaprogramming, a language design where program representations (machine forms) are first-class values, form manipulation is pure computation, and materialization (the transition from form to executable machine) is a governed effect subject to structural inspection. The governance system analyzes the proposed program's capability requirements, policy compliance, and resource estimates before permitting execution. We formalize two judgments: pure form evaluation (which emits no directives) and governed materialization (which emits exactly one governed directive). We prove three properties: purity of form manipulation, the no-bypass theorem, and boundary preservation. We implement the design in mashinTalk, a DSL for AI workflows compiling to BEAM byte code, and report on integration with 454 existing machine-checked Rocq theorems. The central contribution is reclassifying eval from a language primitive into a governed effect.

Language carries thought and coordination among humans but rarely reaches further along the spectrum of diverse intelligence. Yet non-neural systems -- from gene regulatory networks and microbial consortia to fungi -- are increasingly recognized as substrates of computation, decision-making and memory, making dialogue with non-human intelligence newly conceivable. Today such dialogue is attempted only by proxy: a large language model speaks on the system's behalf, so any intelligence on display originates from the model while the system itself remains silent. Here we ask whether the system can speak in its own voice. Following Wittgenstein, who located meaning in use, we treat communication as a game played with the system. Its internal dynamics are frozen as the nonlinear core of a reinforcement-learning policy, with only linear input and output interfaces trained. Through use and reward, the system's states and responses acquire meaning within the game, so playing becomes speaking. Because different architectures playing the same game optimize the same reward, their behaviors can all be read as pursuit of that reward; the game serves as a lingua franca across otherwise irreconcilable representations. Given a human prompt, a language model routes it to the game whose semantics best match it and designs an environmental state for which the desired action is the rational response, letting the system reply through its own behavior. Applied across diverse gene regulatory networks and reinforcement-learning tasks, the framework yields fluent dialogue without altering any system parameter, shows that well-trained agents of disparate origin converge on similar behavior, and reveals that specific GRN properties make a system easier or harder to talk with -- an inductive bias of the reservoir itself. Our framework opens a new route to conversing with any dynamical system on its own terms.

We present our shared task on evaluating the adaptability of LLMs and NLP systems across multiple languages and cultures. The task data consist of an extended version of our manually constructed BLEnD benchmark (Myung et al. 2024), covering more than 30 language-culture pairs, predominantly representing low-resource languages spoken across multiple continents. As the task is designed strictly for evaluation, participants were not permitted to use the data for training, fine-tuning, few-shot learning, or any other form of model modification. Our task includes two tracks: (a) Short-Answer Questions (SAQ) and (b) Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQ). Participants were required to predict labels and were allowed to submit any NLP system and adopt diverse modelling strategies, provided that the benchmark was used solely for evaluation. The task attracted more than 140 registered participants, and we received final submissions from 62 teams, along with 19 system description papers. We report the results and present an analysis of the best-performing systems and the most commonly adopted approaches. Furthermore, we discuss shared insights into open questions and challenges related to evaluation, misalignment, and methodological perspectives on model behaviour in low-resource languages and for under-represented cultures.

The record of the beginning of the most widespread legal system in the world is contained in millions of pages of handwritten text. Most of the records of the first centuries of the Anglo-American legal system are hand-written in a highly abbreviated form of medieval Latin which only a few dozen scholars in the world are trained to read. In this interdisciplinary project, we construct a dataset of 4029 lines of text across 193 medieval criminal and civil cases. We then use the dataset to train an open-source end-to-end pipeline for transcribing these manuscripts. We first train standard neural network architectures for line segmentation and handwriting recognition (R-Blla and CNN+LSTM with CTC decoding, respectively) and show that they can already achieve 79% word accuracy, despite the relatively small training set and the challenge of expanding abbreviations. We then demonstrate that simple post-processing significantly boosts accuracy: adding an n-gram language model to the CTC decoder improves word accuracy to 82%, while asking Gemini Pro 3 to correct mistakes boosts accuracy to 88%. Finally, we compare the CNN+LSTM architecture with TrOCR, a transformer-based OCR architecture, demonstrating that TrOCR shows comparable word accuracy but worse character accuracy due to its over-willingness to guess, making it harder for humans to infer the correct reading. We incorporated our pipeline into a web portal (glyphmachina.com), opening up the English legal tradition to legal scholars, medievalists, and students.

Integrating multimodal foundation models into enterprise ecosystems presents a fundamental software architecture challenge. Architects must balance competing quality attributes: the high latency and non-determinism of vision language action (VLA) models versus the strict determinism and real-time performance required by enterprise control loops. In this study, we propose an architectural pattern language for visual agents that separates fast, deterministic reflexes from slow, probabilistic supervision. It consists of four architectural design patterns: (1) Hybrid Affordance Integration, (2) Adaptive Visual Anchoring, (3) Visual Hierarchy Synthesis, and (4) Semantic Scene Graph.

Detecting language ideologies is a valuable yet complex task for understanding how identities are constructed through discourse. In Luxembourg's multicultural and multilingual society, language ideologies reflect more than simple preferences: they carry deep cultural and social meanings, shaping identities and social belonging. Following recent developments in applying Natural Language Processing tools to linguistics and social science, this paper explores the potential of large language models to assist in the detection of language ideologies. We manually annotate a corpus of user comments in Luxembourgish with predefined ideological categories and then evaluate the performance of large language models under varying prompt conditions to assess their ability to replicate these human annotations. Since Luxembourgish is a small language and poorly represented in the LLMs' training data, we also investigate whether machine-translating the data to high-resource languages increases performance on the ideology detection task. Our findings suggest that, while LLMs are not yet fully optimized for a multi-class ideological annotation task, they are practical tools to identify language ideological content.

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong multilingual capabilities, yet often fail to consistently generate responses in the intended language, exhibiting a phenomenon known as language confusion. Prior mitigation approaches based on sequence-level fine-tuning, such as DPO, ORPO, and GRPO, operate at the level of entire responses and can lead to unintended degradation of general model capabilities, motivating the need for more fine-grained alternatives. To address this, we introduce Token-Level Policy Optimization (TLPO), a fine-tuning framework designed to mitigate language confusion through localized, token-level updates. TLPO identifies error-prone positions, explores alternative candidate tokens, and updates the policy using a tailored objective to suppress error-inducing outputs at a granular level. This selective intervention enables effective mitigation of language confusion without compromising the model's general abilities. Experiments on multiple multilingual LLMs across diverse languages demonstrate that TLPO significantly outperforms baselines in improving language consistency while preserving downstream task accuracy.

LLMs and speech assistants are increasingly used for task-oriented interactions, yet their evaluation often relies on controlled scenarios that fail to capture the variability and complexity of real user requests. Drink ordering, for example, involves diverse named entities, drink types, sizes, customizations, and brand-specific terminology, as well as spontaneous speech phenomena such as hesitations and self-corrections. To address this gap, we introduce StarDrinks, a test set in English and Korean containing speech utterances features, transcriptions, and annotated slots. Our dataset supports speech-to-slots SLU, transcription-to-slots NLU, and speech-to-transcription ASR evaluation, providing a realistic benchmark for model robustness and generalization in a linguistically rich, real-world task.

AI-powered language learning tools increasingly provide instant, personalised feedback to millions of learners worldwide. However, this feedback can fail in ways that are difficult for learners--and even teachers--to detect, potentially reinforcing misconceptions and eroding learning outcomes over extended use. We present a portion of L2-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating AI systems in language education that includes (but is not limited to) six critical dimensions of effective feedback: diagnostic accuracy, awareness of appropriacy, causes of error, prioritisation, guidance for improvement, and supporting self-regulation. We analyse how AI systems can fail with respect to these dimensions. These failures, which we argue are conducive to "explainability pitfalls," are AI-generated explanations that appear helpful on the surface but are fundamentally flawed, increasing the risk of attainment, human-AI interaction, and socioaffective harms. We discuss how the specific context of language learning amplifies these risks and outline open questions we believe merit more attention when designing evaluation frameworks specifically. Our analysis aims to expand the community's understanding of both the typology of explainability pitfalls and the contextual dynamics in which they may occur in order to encourage AI developers to better design safe, trustworthy, and effective AI explanations.

Preserving a speaker's voice identity while generating speech in a different language remains a fundamental challenge in spoken language technology, particularly in specialized domains such as scientific communication. In this paper, we address this challenge through our system submission to the International Conference on Spoken Language Translation (IWSLT 2026), the Cross-Lingual Voice Cloning shared task. First, we evaluate several state-of-the-art voice cloning models for cross-lingual speech generation of scientific texts in Arabic, Chinese, and French. Then, we build voice cloning systems based on the OmniVoice foundation model. We employ data augmentation via multi-model ensemble distillation from the ACL 60/60 corpus. We investigate the effect of using this synthetic data for fine-tuning, demonstrating improvements in intelligibility (WER & CER) and speaker similarity (SIM), with gains varying across languages.

We present a unified quantitative analysis of the Currier A/B language distinction in the Voynich Manuscript, proceeding in two stages. First, we confirm that the distinction is genuine: a Beta-Binomial mixture model applied to character-pair substitution ratios across 185 folios, without access to Currier's labels, selects 2 by BIC and predicts held-out folio labels at 89% accuracy. Second, we show that the A/B contrast is not primitive but is a low-resolution projection of a higher-dimensional generative system. Its dominant component is a discrete boolean "switch" set once per folio, governing the vowel following the digraphs ch and sh. A two-state binomial mixture achieves Delta\ AIC = 2,549 over a single-state model and assigns 195 of 197 folios unambiguously. This switch does not operate uniformly: word templates divide into fixed contexts and switchable contexts, with template identity accounting for 92% of variance.

Large language models (LLMs) operate in two fundamental learning modes - fine-tuning (FT) and in-context learning (ICL) - raising key questions about which mode yields greater language proficiency and whether they differ in their inductive biases. Prior studies comparing FT and ICL have yielded mixed and inconclusive results due to inconsistent experimental setups. To enable a rigorous comparison, we propose a formal language learning task - offering precise language boundaries, controlled string sampling, and no data contamination - and introduce a discriminative test for language proficiency, where an LLM succeeds if it assigns higher generation probability to in-language strings than to out-of-language strings. Empirically, we find that: (a) FT has greater language proficiency than ICL on in-distribution generalization, but both perform equally well on out-of-distribution generalization. (b) Their inductive biases, measured by the correlation in string generation probabilities, are similar when both modes partially learn the language but diverge at higher proficiency levels. (c) Unlike FT, ICL performance differs substantially across models of varying sizes and families and is sensitive to the token vocabulary of the language. Thus, our work demonstrates the promise of formal languages as a controlled testbed for evaluating LLMs, behaviors that are difficult to isolate in natural language datasets. Our source code is available at https://github.com/bishwamittra/formallm.

Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is rising across India as habitat loss and expanding human settlements force elephants into closer contact with people. While the ecological drivers of conflict are well-studied, how the news media portrays them remains largely unexplored. This work presents the first large-scale computational analysis of media framing of HEC in India, examining 1,968 full-length news articles consisting of 28,986 sentences, from a major English-language outlet published between January 2022 and September 2025. Using a multi-model sentiment framework that combines long-context transformers, large language models, and a domain-specific Negative Elephant Portrayal Lexicon, we quantify sentiment, extract rationale sentences, and identify linguistic patterns that contribute to negative portrayals of elephants. Our findings reveal a dominance of fear-inducing and aggression-related language. Since the media framing can shape public attitudes toward wildlife and conservation policy, such narratives risk reinforcing public hostility and undermining coexistence efforts. By providing a transparent, scalable methodology and releasing all resources through an anonymized repository, this study highlights how Web-scale text analysis can support responsible wildlife reporting and promote socially beneficial media practices.

We show that pre-training a Transformer on music before language significantly accelerates language acquisition. Using piano performances (MAESTRO dataset), a developmental pipeline -- music $\to$ poetry $\to$ prose -- yields a $17.5\%$ perplexity improvement over random initialization ($p < 0.001$, 5 seeds), with music and poetry improving orthogonal model components (internal computation and embeddings, respectively). Convergence tests confirm that this is not a transient head start: at $d\!=\!64$, multi-seed validation (5 seeds) shows a persistent 5.5% gap at plateau ($p = 0.017$), with the pipeline converging faster and to a lower loss in every run. Real music matches the transfer ceiling of synthetic patterns with one-third the data, and scaling experiments reveal that optimal pre-training data volume shifts with model capacity ($-3\% \to +3\% \to +6\%$ advantage of larger datasets from $d\!=\!16$ to $d\!=\!64$). Across the scales we study ($d\!\in\!\{16,32,64\}$, up to ${\sim}400$K parameters), these results suggest a capacity-dependent data curation principle and indicate that structured human creative outputs can provide an efficient pre-training substrate for small language models; stronger conclusions at modern pre-training scale will require substantially larger experiments.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in applications for global multilingual users, yet safety training remains concentrated in dominant languages and has not progressed in parallel with multilingual capability, creating exploitable gaps for jailbreak attacks. Current jailbreak defenses are largely developed and evaluated in dominant languages, and their effectiveness is limited by the scarcity of aligned multilingual supervision and representations dispersion caused by language variation. To address this issue, we propose MLJailDe, a multilingual jailbreak detection framework designed to improve both multilingual robustness and cross-lingual generalization. MLJailDe first introduces a multilingual back-translation data augmentation algorithm to construct a semantically consistent and functionally effective dataset spanning 11 languages, consisting of 2,232 benign and 1,239 jailbreak samples. On this basis, MLJailDe employs relative-distance constraints to reduce cross-lingual representation dispersion and encourage jailbreak prompts with similar intent to form consistent clusters across languages, while an imbalance-aware classification objective is further used to alleviate class imbalance and learn more reliable multilingual decision boundaries. Experimental results show that MLJailDe outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across multiple languages, achieving an F1 score of 98.5%, and obtains an average F1 score of 97.1% on unseen languages, demonstrating strong effectiveness and cross-lingual generalization.

Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation (mRAG) leverages cross-lingual evidence to ground Large Language Models (LLMs) in global knowledge. However, we show that current mRAG systems suffer from a language bias during reranking, systematically favoring English and the query's native language. By introducing an estimated oracle evidence analysis, we quantify a substantial performance gap between existing rerankers and the achievable upper bound. Further analysis reveals a critical distributional mismatch: while optimal predictions require evidence scattered across multiple languages, current systems systematically suppress such ``answer-critical'' documents, thereby limiting downstream generation performance. To bridge this gap, we propose \textit{\textbf{L}anguage-\textbf{A}gnostic \textbf{U}tility-driven \textbf{R}eranker \textbf{A}lignment (LAURA)}, which aligns multilingual evidence ranking with downstream generative utility. Experiments across diverse languages and generation models show that LAURA effectively mitigates language bias and consistently improves mRAG performance.

Peer review plays a central role in the NLP publication process, but is susceptible to various biases. Here, we study language-of-study (LoS) bias: the tendency for reviewers to evaluate a paper differently based on the language(s) it studies, rather than its scientific merit. Despite being explicitly flagged in reviewing guidelines, such biases are poorly understood. Prior work treats such comments as part of broader categories of weak or unconstructive reviews without defining them as a distinct form of bias. We present the first systematic characterization of LoS bias, distinguishing negative and positive forms, and introduce the human-annotated dataset LOBSTER (Language-Of-study Bias in ScienTific pEer Review) and an LLM-based detection pipeline achieving 87.37 macro F1. We analyze 15,645 reviews to estimate how negative and positive biases differ with respect to the LoS, and find that non-English papers face substantially higher bias rates than English-only ones, with negative bias consistently outweighing positive bias. Finally, we identify four subcategories of negative bias, and find that demanding unjustified cross-lingual generalization is the most dominant form. We publicly release all resources to support work on fairer reviewing practices in NLP and beyond.

The design of Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has been shown to be "unfair" to less-spoken languages (Petrov et al., 2023) and to deepen the digital language divide (Bella et al., 2023). Critical sociolinguistic work has also argued that these technologies are not only made possible by prior sociohistorical processes of linguistic standardisation, often grounded in European nationalist and colonial projects (Migge and Schneider, 2025), but also exacerbate epistemologies of language as "monolithic, monolingual, syntactically standardized systems of meaning" (Schneider, 2024, p. 5). In our paper, we draw on earlier work on the intersections of technology and language policy (Kelly-Holmes, 2019) and bring our respective expertise in critical sociolinguistics and computational linguistics to bear on an interrogation of these arguments. We take two different complexes of non-standard linguistic varieties in our respective repertoires-South Tyrolean dialects, which are widely used in informal communication in South Tyrol, Italy (Alber et al., 2024), as well as varieties of Kurdish-as starting points to an interdisciplinary exploration of the intersections between GenAI and linguistic variation and standardisation. We discuss both how LLMs can be made to deal with non-standard language from a technical perspective, and whether, when or how this can contribute to "democratic and decolonial digital and machine learning strategies" (Migge and Schneider, 2025, p. 12), which has direct policy implications.

Most digital language learning curricula rely on discrete-item quizzes that test recall rather than applied conversational proficiency. When progression is driven by quiz performance, learners can advance despite persistent gaps in using grammar and vocabulary during interaction. Recent work on LLM-based judging suggests a path toward scoring open-ended conversations, but using interaction evidence to drive progression and review requires scoring protocols that are reliable and validated. We introduce Learning in Blocks, a framework that grounds progression in demonstrated conversational competence evaluated using CEFR-aligned rubrics. The framework employs heterogeneous multi-agent debate (HeteroMAD) in two stages: a scoring stage where role-specialized agents independently evaluate Grammar, Vocabulary, and Interactive Communication, engage in debate to address conflicting judgments, and a judge synthesizes consensus scores; and a recommendation stage that identifies specific grammar skills and vocabulary topics for targeted review. Progression requires demonstrating 70% mastery, and spaced review targets identified weaknesses to counter skill decay. We benchmark four scoring and recommendation methods on CEFR A2 conversations annotated by ESL experts. HeteroMAD achieves a superior score agreement with a 0.23 degree of variation and recommendation acceptability of 90.91%. An 8-week study with 180 CEFR A2 learners demonstrates that combining rubric-aligned scoring and recommendation with spaced review and mastery-based progression produces better learning outcomes than feedback alone.

The widespread use of LLM-based writing assistance has raised an interesting question about the homogenization of English. As LLMs tend to revise texts toward mainstream English conventions reflected in their training data, the subtle fingerprints that reflect an author's native language (L1) may be gradually disappearing. This study investigates this phenomenon by analyzing native language identification (NLI) performance on academic abstracts. To this end, we construct two NLI datasets of academic abstracts extracted from arXiv and the ACL Anthology that covers eight native language groups across three time periods: pre-neural network (NN), pre-LLM, and post-LLM. We then evaluate NLI performance for each era using NLI classifiers obtained by fine-tuning LLMs. The results reveal a consistent decline in NLI performance over time. Notably, however, the decline is more pronounced from the pre-NN era to the pre-LLM era than from the pre-LLM era to the post-LLM era. This suggests that although academic English appears to have become increasingly homogenized in the LLM era, this homogenization did not suddenly emerge with the advent of LLMs; rather, it has progressed gradually since the emergence of neural approaches to language processing. Furthermore, a rewriting experiment using recent LLMs shows a larger NLI performance drop than the progression across eras alone, suggesting that increased LLM use may lead to further homogenization in the future.

Interlinear glossed text (IGT) is a standard notation for language documentation which is linguistically rich but laborious to produce manually. Recent automated IGT methods treat glosses as character sequences, neglecting their compositional structure. We propose CWoMP (Contrastive Word-Morpheme Pretraining), which instead treats morphemes as atomic form-meaning units with learned representations. A contrastively trained encoder aligns words-in-context with their constituent morphemes in a shared embedding space; an autoregressive decoder then generates the morpheme sequence by retrieving entries from a mutable lexicon of these embeddings. Predictions are interpretable--grounded in lexicon entries--and users can improve results at inference time by expanding the lexicon without retraining. We evaluate on diverse low-resource languages, showing that CWoMP outperforms existing methods while being significantly more efficient, with particularly strong gains in extremely low-resource settings.

Knowledge distillation (KD) is widely used to compress and post-train large language models (LLMs), yet many existing frameworks execute teacher inference with the same training-oriented backend as student optimization, leading to suboptimal efficiency. In this paper, we propose KDFlow, a novel framework for LLM distillation that features a decoupled architecture and employs SGLang for teacher inference. KDFlow combines SGLang for teacher inference with PyTorch FSDP2 for student optimization, allowing each model to run on a backend tailored to its workload. To enable efficient full-vocabulary distillation in this decoupled architecture, KDFlow transfers the teacher's final hidden states via Ray's object store and recomputes teacher logits on each student worker using a frozen copy of the teacher's output head. Furthermore, our framework supports both off-policy and on-policy distillation and incorporates cross-tokenizer algorithms through highly extensible and user-friendly APIs. Experiments show that KDFlow achieves a 1.44$\times$ to 6.36$\times$ speedup over MS-SWIFT in off-policy distillation and a 1.43$\times$ to 1.75$\times$ speedup over verl in on-policy distillation. KDFlow further scales to 64 GPUs, achieving 3.68$\times$ and 2.52$\times$ strong-scaling speedups in two representative model configurations. The code and documentation are publicly available.

Multilingual NLP research increasingly involves hundreds or thousands of languages across different datasets. Managing, discovering, and reporting language metadata becomes a common hurdle at these scales. We present QQ, a metadata toolkit and browser explorer. QQ compiles language metadata sources into a graph of language varieties, scripts, regions, identifiers, names, and relations, and exposes it through a Python API, a command-line interface, and a browser-based explorer. Users can normalize identifiers, retrieve metadata, traverse relations, and discover which external resources contain a language. We demonstrate QQ on three workflows: an audit of the HuggingFace Hub, linking resources that use different identifier systems, and generating reproducible language-reporting tables. QQ supports FAIR-oriented metadata practices through versioning, open formats, and reusable interfaces.