Impact Analysis

Unified models are trained for both instruction-based image editing and text-to-image (T2I) generation, but standard editing pipelines keep source-image conditioning throughout denoising. We ask whether editing can benefit from T2I, and study how the effects of conditioning vary across edits and denoising stages. In pure editing, source attention declines for some edits over the sampling trajectory. This observation led us to task switching, which lets the model draw on its T2I capabilities. Across three unified editors and four benchmarks, switching to the T2I task for bounded intervals improves edit quality, while mean perceptual preservation remains close to pure editing across all three models. Unified editors therefore benefit from using both conditioning modes they are trained for, and the timing of the switch sets the balance between quality and preservation.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have achieved high task success rates on robot manipulation task benchmarks. More recently, there has been an emphasis on evaluating the robustness of VLA models to perturbations. However, this robustness is still predominantly measured through Task Success Rate (TSR). In this work, we propose a benchmark-agnostic evaluation framework to measure the behavioural robustness of models by characterising how successful trajectories are executed under perturbation. We implement this methodology by extending the widely-used LIBERO and LIBERO-Plus benchmarks. Across three state-of-the-art VLA models, four LIBERO task suites and seven perturbation conditions, we evaluate changes in both typical successful behaviour and its variability, including metrics of motion smoothness, efficiency and gripper behaviour. We find that perturbations can alter the behaviour of successful trajectories, a phenomenon which cannot necessarily be inferred from TSR alone. Across LIBERO suites, we identify cases where state-of-the-art VLA models achieve comparable TSR under the same perturbation condition, yet behaviour on successful trajectories diverges substantially. Therefore, to have a more robust assessment of task performance, we argue that suitable measures of robustness should capture not only whether a task is completed, but also how the robot behaves while completing it. When evaluating the robustness of VLA models, TSR may be complemented by behavioural evaluation metrics that characterise the nature and variability of successful task execution by robots.

As the capabilities and ubiquity of Large Language Models (LLMs) grow, so does their environmental footprint. Despite calls for responsible AI, the machine learning community lacks standardised practices for carbon accounting. Our automated literature review of the 5,285 papers accepted to NeurIPS 2025 reveals that reporting of environmental impact is nearly non-existent. To catalyse a shift toward sustainable AI, we define standardised sustainability metrics for evaluating model training efficiency, accompanied by simple heuristics to estimate the carbon cost of LLM inference. We implement these metrics in carbonbenchmark, a drop-in software solution for tracking and reporting emissions. Finally, to combat the pursuit of marginal accuracy gains at disproportionate environmental costs, we formalise the Smallest Model that Achieves the Job' (SMAJ), a framework which challenges the field to prioritise computational efficiency and environmental accountability alongside traditional State-of-the-Art' (SotA) accuracy.

In this paper, we explore the impulsive dynamics common to single-joint, two-link models of walking and brachiating gaits with respect to slope and switching time. In particular, we investigate how the stability of a gait and bifurcations encountered within a family of gaits change under time-based and state-based switching of the impulsive dynamics.

Ambulance ramping, the delay between hospital arrival and patient handover, is a critical operational bottleneck in Emergency Medical Services (EMS), yet its systemic magnitude and dynamics remain inadequately characterised at scale. This paper quantifies the scale, trajectory, and operational correlates of ramping across an entire statewide EMS system, analysing 2,850,575 ambulance attendances in Victoria, Australia from January 2020 to March 2024 using an Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA). After systematic preprocessing, an analytical cohort of 2,026,569 Emergency Department (ED) transports across 59 hospitals with ED and 79 Local Government Areas (LGA) was examined through interval decomposition, Pareto concentration, hourly cross-correlation, hospital arrival concurrency and priority-stratified operational comparisons. Cumulative Ambulance Hours Lost (AHL) totalled 1,491,127 hours, equivalent to approximately 96 ten-hour ambulance shift lost every day of the study window. Ten of 59 hospitals account for 57.8% of lost hours from 50.9% of cases. Annual losses rose 57% to a 2022 peak while transported demand fell 3.7%, indicating deterioration in per-case handover rather than growth in demand. Handover duration varies little with patient acuity, but rises monotonically with the number of ambulances arriving at the same hospital in the preceding hour, an effect persisting within every hour of the day. Hourly demand is moderately associated with ramping two to four hours later (r = 0.365). These findings establish the empirical preconditions for hospital-state aware ambulance routing.

Estimating causal effects from observational data is central to science and policy, but the effects are not identified when confounders are unmeasured. Proximal causal inference addresses this problem with proxies of the unmeasured confounders. However, existing proxy-based approaches either designate proxy roles and solve an inverse problem, which is ill-posed and hard to estimate with high-dimensional proxies, or use a latent-variable model, which assumes that the learned latent variable matches the hidden confounder and leaves bias when it does not. To address these challenges, we introduce proximal balancing. It carries the classical idea of covariate balancing to confounders that are observed only through proxies: it learns a low-dimensional summary of the covariates and proxies that makes the treatment groups comparable, and then adjusts for this summary. It needs no designated proxy roles, inverse problem, or latent model. We give identification theory, finite-sample guarantees, and a practical algorithm, PROBE. We demonstrate the method on low-dimensional, high-dimensional, and image proxies and on real-world data.

Attention-head ablation, zeroing a head and measuring the resulting change in task performance, is a common method for inferring which components of a language model are causally responsible for a behavior. We show using GPT-2 small that this inference can be fragile unless the intervention semantics, evaluation metric, and controls are carefully validated. A natural post-projection implementation of "zeroing a head" is nearly uncorrelated with a corrected pre-projection ablation (Pearson r = 0.057) and selects a completely disjoint top-5 set of important heads. We also show that binary accuracy can hide effects at behavioral floors and near ceilings, whereas gold-token log-probability remains graded. Using a discovery/held-out split and 1,000 matched random-head and layer-matched-head control draws, the corrected per-head effect ranking is highly stable across splits (Spearman rho = 0.974), and the top-5 selected heads significantly exceed both control distributions (Monte Carlo p = 0.001). However, evidence for task specificity is not robust on GPT-2. Replication on DistilGPT2 preserves the intervention-semantic and matched-control findings. These results show that single-head ablation does not by itself justify a causal claim; defensible interpretation requires correct intervention placement, a non-saturated continuous metric, and matched held-out controls.

Language models are typically pretrained from random initialization. Recent work challenges this convention, showing that a brief warm-up on abstract, algorithmically generated data can provide a better starting point for subsequent learning of natural language. In this paper, we show that in small language models, such a warm-up improves specific capabilities that are not reflected in language-modeling perplexity. Our warm-up uses an abstract stack-manipulation task that requires compositional and state-tracking capabilities. Allocating as little as 1% of pretraining tokens to this data improves multi-hop question answering by up to 3.9 F1 points on MUSIQUE, with additional gains on HOTPOTQA and 2WIKIMULTIHOPQA despite comparable language-modeling perplexity. Controlled experiments show that the warm-up substantially accelerates the acquisition of deeper reasoning chains. We also explore what drives this transfer. First, the structure of the data matters: replacing the stack task with a queue fails to produce the same gains. Second, the gains are specific: performance improves on sequential reasoning chains, with no consistent benefit on tasks that combine or compare independent facts. Third, timing matters: mixing abstract data with natural language is far less effective than an initial dedicated phase, and exposure after pretraining completely removes the benefits. The early advantage persists through billions of subsequent language tokens. These results show that early abstract training can reliably shape the capabilities language models later acquire.

Cross-linguistic effects are a central topic in bilingual first-language acquisition. Artificial learners can help investigate L1-L2 interactions by enabling controlled comparisons across language combinations and learning conditions. Recent work explores this direction by training bilingual language models under developmentally plausible constraints. However, human and model learners still diverge in fundamental ways, with one major difference being input modality: children learn primarily from spoken input, whereas language models are typically trained on orthographic text. To reduce this gap, researchers have trained models on phonemic representations of speech. In this work, we combine these research directions to train bilingual BabyLMs with phonemic input. We keep English fixed as the L2 and vary the L1 across German, Swedish, Persian, and Basque, selected to represent contrasting combinations of syntactic and phoneme-inventory distance from English. Our results show stronger L1-related variation in grammatical learning trajectories under phonemic than orthographic input, while early lexical differences align with phoneme-inventory similarity.

Omni-modal large language models (LLMs) are expected to answer a question using the modality it explicitly refers to. However, existing training paradigms rarely verify whether models actually follow this modality, because multimodal inputs from the same sample often provide redundant evidence for the same answer. In this work, we uncover a pervasive cross-modal shortcut in omni-modal LLMs: when asked an audio-related question, models rely on the image as much as on the audio, and sometimes even more. To systematically diagnose this behavior, we introduce the Factorized Modality Diagnostic, which independently swaps audio and images between samples to isolate each modality's causal contribution. Across two model families in different settings, we find that this shortcut persists throughout supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning post-training, while judge-based RL may further amplify such reliance on irrelevant visual information. Based on this finding, we propose DMC-Repair, which trains models on the same kind of cross-modal swapped samples while assigning supervision according to the modality specified by the question. This prevents models from exploiting the spurious correspondence between modalities within the same clip. Experiments demonstrate that DMC-Repair reduces the image-induced share of the answer effect by 59.9%, effectively suppressing the cross-modal shortcut without compromising audio-question answering performance. The reduction in shortcut reliance generalizes across two model families and zero-shot to an unseen dataset and an unseen benchmark, and persists through subsequent post-training. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DMC-Repair.

Visual emotion recognition commonly assumes that all evidence required for prediction is contained in the observed image or video. Yet the same visible reaction can convey different emotions depending on events beyond the input: tears, for example, may indicate grief or joy. We formulate Event-Grounded Emotion Recognition (EGER), where emotion recognition requires recovering the affect-determining event. We construct EGER-Bench, comprising 10,052 videos and 10,734 images across 11 emotions, two source domains, and four visual settings. A study with six annotators shows that event context raises human recognition accuracy from 33.96% to 72.08%, confirming that visual evidence alone is often insufficient. Semantic relevance alone does not solve EGER: a plausible event may imply the wrong emotion if its identity, focal-person role, relationship, or outcome is misinterpreted. We therefore propose AffectReveal, a tuning-free framework that first constructs and independently verifies evidence-grounded alternatives over these affect-critical factors. It then cross-checks the recovered event against face-masked in-media facts through bidirectional atomic evidence support, while retaining the original unmasked input for final prediction. Across three downstream models and four input settings, AffectReveal yields average UAR gains of 5.26--10.53 points. For three fine-tunable models, it also enables untuned models to outperform their fine-tuned visual-only counterparts in all 12 accuracy comparisons, without updating downstream parameters.

Relational in-context learning (ICL) conditions predictions on the labeled support examples and their linked tables, creating a failure mode when the support set contains target-derived features that are unavailable for the query. We formulate this problem as support-set target leakage, distinct from leakage during dataset construction, temporal splitting, or representation learning. Here, the target-derived (leaker) columns are present only in the labeled support set during relational in-context inference, while queries remain clean. We construct 14 synthetic leaker types, corresponding to 20 columns, spanning proxies with different noise levels, coverage, modalities, semantic transparency, and relational distances. We evaluate a frozen relational encoder with an ICL head on held-out RelBench databases and use Integrated Gradients (IG) to rank and remove suspicious columns. Our results show that the effect of support-set leakage varies across tasks and relational distances. Target-table leakers cause the clearest degradation, while one- and two-hop leakers are not consistently used by the model. IG ranks target-table leakers highly across datasets and partially recovers performance in settings where leakage has the largest effect.

Generative agent-based models (GABMs) are increasingly used to simulate social media dynamics, including misinformation spread. For such social simulations to be valid proxies of human behavior, LLM agents should replicate established human cognitive biases, among them the Illusory Truth Effect (ITE), where repeated exposure to a claim increases its perceived truth value. We investigate whether and how the ITE manifests across four LLMs (Gemma-3-4b-it, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, and GPT-5-nano) in a social media simulation context. We propose a two-phase within-context experimental design that embeds the repetition manipulation inside a realistic news feed interaction. Using this design, we collect 336,000 truth, importance, sentiment, and interest ratings across 100 statements, 10 feed variants, and 3 replications. The key comparison is between ratings assigned to repeated statements, seen throughout a simulation phase, and completely unseen ones, rated within the same experimental context window. We distinguish genuine ITE (truth-specific repetition boost) from mere exposure effects. We run an OLS regression followed by a Linear Mixed-Effect Model to account for differences across models and ratings. Our results reveal four qualitatively distinct patterns: Gemma-3 exhibits a genuine ITE; Qwen2.5 shows a mere exposure effect; GPT-5-nano displays no repetition effect on truth and mild skepticism toward repeated content; Llama-3.1 shows a small truth boost alongside decreases in evaluative dimensions. Crucially, temperature has no effect on these findings, and a variance decomposition highlights the high context-sensitivity of LLM rating behavior. Our findings caution against assuming uniform ITE replication across LLMs in social simulations, while suggesting that Gemma-3-4b-it may offer the most behaviorally realistic approximation for misinformation-related simulations.

In contrast to even a year ago, AI systems now write most of the code inside the companies that build them. As more of the AI research and development (R&D) pipeline is automated, could AI progress radically accelerate in an "intelligence explosion," where years of advances are compressed into months or less? Preliminary evidence suggests that it could. In this work, we assess this evidence, analyze an intelligence explosion's potential impacts, and propose policy responses. AI systems are on track to automate most AI R&D work within a few years, and possibly all of it. If this triggers an intelligence explosion, it could dramatically bring forward AI's benefits, but also pose extreme risks: capabilities growth could accelerate far beyond what society can keep up with, humanity could lose control over superhuman AI systems, and checks on power within and between states, companies, and branches of government could be severely eroded. Although there remains much uncertainty about these possibilities, the high stakes warrant serious further attention. Policymakers should urgently obtain more visibility into the automation of AI R&D, develop ways to steer and constrain an intelligence explosion, and prepare society to adapt to an intelligence explosion's impacts.

Large language models are increasingly used as interactive writing tools, where users develop stories, revise ideas, and introduce new requirements across multiple turns rather than specifying a complete brief upfront. Yet most evidence on multi-turn instruction degradation comes from tasks with objectively verifiable outcomes, leaving unclear whether incremental interaction harms creative artifacts in ways that explicit requirement checks cannot capture. We study this question using 160 human-authored creative-writing tasks across six genres, presenting each intended specification either upfront or progressively over 5-9 turns to six distinct open-weight model families, yielding 960 matched pairs. Progressive delivery reduces explicit constraint adherence and produces its largest writing-quality degradation in structure/coherence. The structural gap persists among outputs with equal observed adherence, suggesting that measured requirement loss alone does not explain the observed structural difference. We define Creative Integrity as a compact measure of joint adherence and narrative structure; under incremental delivery, models retain 71.2% of FULL Creative Integrity (95% CI [68.2%, 74.3%]). A three-rater human study over 50 matched pairs independently recovers FULL advantages in structure/coherence, craft, and genre effectiveness, while automated scores remain positively associated with aggregated human ratings. These findings show that interactive creative-writing systems should be evaluated not only on whether requirements survive conversation, but also on whether evolving requirements remain coherently integrated into the final artifact. Our dataset, benchmarks, and source code are available at: https://github.com/solusops/SISTER-2026-Team19

In this paper, a methodology to design fair graph convolutional neural networks (GCNs) is developed and tested over several application data sets. The graphs that are used as inputs to the network are constructed by a k-nearest neighbor-based preprocessing procedure, while fairness issues are considered in terms of the equalized odds criterion. To effectively incorporate the above heterogenous information, the equalized odds criterion is directly embedded into the model's optimization objective through an additional fairness-driven loss functional term. The proposed methodology investigates how varying the neighborhood size in the k-NN algorithm during graph construction influences both the classification performance and the fairness of the resulting models. Extensive experimentation is conducted on three real-world tabular datasets with known biases, evaluating the interplay between graph structure and fairness enforcement. The results demonstrate that the choice of the value of the parameter k critically impacts the performance trends, either steadily improving or peaking at intermediate values depending on dataset characteristics, while the application of fairness constraints significantly mitigates disparities in false positive and false negative rates across groups defined by the protected variable at hand, without incurring major sacrifices in overall accuracy. This study highlights the importance of jointly optimizing the graph construction process and fairness objectives in GCN-based learning, providing a systematic approach toward building more equitable and effective graph-based models.

Scientific ideation is increasingly mediated by large language models, but current ideation systems are usually trained and evaluated on immediately judgeable proxies such as novelty, clarity, and feasibility. This leaves open whether delayed signals of scientific uptake can be used as feedback for steering models toward research directions with higher expected \emph{impact}. We study this question using citation-normalized impact as a noisy but scalable proxy for scholarly uptake. We construct a large-scale dataset from over 100K computer science papers by extracting goal-conditioned idea descriptions and assigning each paper an ordinal, year-normalized citation label. We then train a goal-conditioned reward model to predict citation-impact labels from research goal and idea pairs, and use this reward to align an idea generator through supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning. To reduce circularity, we evaluate generated ideas with a held-out, reference-grounded protocol that compares model outputs against historical ideas under the same research goal and weights judgments by the reference idea's citation-impact label. Experiments show that our RL-tuned model consistently produces ideas with higher estimated impact than both the base model and supervised fine-tuning baselines. Our findings position scientific impact as a practical, outcome-grounded feedback signal for aligning LLMs in open-ended scientific discovery.

Accurate digital maps are essential for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) or Autonomous Driving (AD), providing critical information such as road geometry, traffic signs and speed limits required by safety functions including Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA). Maintaining these map layers using traditional surveying methods is costly and difficult to scale. Crowdsourced approaches based on fleets provide a promising alternative for continuously validating and updating map information. However, the relationship between the number of contributing vehicles and the quality of the resulting map remains poorly understood. To address this gap, this paper presents a simulation-based framework for evaluating crowdsourced traffic sign maintenance using a dissimilarity measure called GOSPAM (Generalized Optimal SubPattern Assignment for Maps), which combines localization errors with detection performance by accounting for False Positives (FP) and False Negatives (FN). The proposed system models multivehicle observations with representative sensor noise, detection errors, and semantic recognition uncertainties. Observations from multiple vehicles are aggregated using spatial clustering and semantic filtering to estimate traffic sign locations. Using simulated trajectories generated from data carried out by an experimental vehicle in an area containing ground-truth traffic signs, we assess the influence of fleet size on the performance of crowdsourced mapping. The number of vehicles ranges from 5 to 50, and performance is analyzed using standard evaluation metrics which are compared to the GOSPAM . The results show that GOSPAM can be used to effectively assess the quality of crowdsourced mapping, such as the contributions made by the first vehicles or the improvements made by numerous vehicles.

Neural Processes (NPs) are model-based meta-learners that implicitly learn a stochastic process and adapt to a new task from a small context set. Most extensions of NPs focus on improving the neural network architecture. We instead develop an extension motivated by the shared hierarchical interpretation of meta-learning and mixed-effects models. Specifically, we introduce Neural Process Boosting (NPBoost), which decomposes structured response variability into tree-boosted fixed effects shared across tasks and NP random effects that capture stochastic task-to-task variation. We propose to train the two components jointly using a boosting algorithm in which an NP learns residual task-specific structure and a tree ensemble estimates common patterns across tasks. Across synthetic and real-world tabular meta-learning problems, this decomposition improves over a standard NP when the shared structure contains discontinuities or other irregular patterns that boosted trees can represent effectively.

Biological torque control directly maps an estimated human joint moment to exoskeleton assistance, providing a task-agnostic strategy for supporting diverse locomotor activities. However, it remains unclear whether a fixed state-to-torque mapping provides effective assistance across biomechanically distinct tasks. We examined how assistance delay affected hip exoskeleton performance during level-ground (LG), ramp-ascent (RA), and ramp-descent (RD) walking. Eight participants completed a zero-torque baseline condition and five active assistance conditions with delays ranging from 40 to 320 ms. Across tasks and active delays, assistance reduced net metabolic rate by 5.24%, positive biological hip joint work by 5.86%, and total lower-limb positive joint work by 1.68% (all p < 0.05). Assistance delay affected both joint-work outcomes (both p < 0.001) but not net metabolic rate. Mechanical unloading generally decreased with increasing delay, whereas metabolic benefits remained comparatively stable. Relative to the zero-torque condition, net metabolic rate decreased by 9.75% during LG and 7.20% during RA but increased by 1.23% during RD. We did not detect task-dependent differences in the delay response. Our findings indicate that biological torque mappings should be evaluated based on the target outcome and mechanical role of the assisted joint, and that predominantly positive-power assistance may not generalize to negative-work-dominant locomotion without modification.

Angular-margin speaker encoders are widely used in voice conversion, yet the geometry of their classifier prototypes remains poorly understood. We analyze ECAPA-TDNN classifier prototypes as points on the unit hypersphere and characterize their organization using rotation-invariant angular statistics together with global and local effective dimensionality measures. Our analysis shows that standard training can induce angular concentration and a substantial reduction in effective dimensionality. To address this, we investigate two geometric regularization strategies (hinged Riesz log-energy and effective-dimension maximization) applied to classifier prototypes to encourage more uniform hyperspherical coverage. The resulting prototype sets exhibit higher effective dimensionality and improved isotropy, with configuration-dependent effects on speaker-recognition performance. When the corresponding ECAPA-TDNN models are used as speaker encoders for Fast-VGAN, the regularized systems also exhibit improved robustness in zero-shot voice conversion, particularly for previously unseen speakers.

Climate variability influences whether a market disruption escalates into a food crisis, yet broad climate patterns like El Niño, tracked months before they alter hydro-climatic conditions, are still not incorporated as an early-warning component in food-security responses. We address this gap by introducing sensitivity regimes, a stratification of regions by the direction and strength of their vegetation response to the El Niño Southern Oscillation, and using them to estimate how food price spikes affect acute food insecurity across sub-Saharan Africa. Integrating remote sensing, socioeconomic data, and causal machine learning, we find that in regions where ENSO systematically suppresses vegetation, a price spike raises the share of the population at acute risk by 5.4 percentage points in the following month. In regions where vegetation is unaffected by or positively linked to ENSO, the estimated effect is smaller (around 2 percentage points) and statistically insignificant. These results demonstrate that climate context is critical for understanding food security vulnerabilities. Sensitivity regimes can be combined with operational price-spike triggers to stage anticipatory action: the ENSO state flags vulnerable regions months ahead, and a pre-positioned response in those regions to a price spike would avert the largest jump in acute food insecurity.

Interest in developing personalised language models is rapidly growing. While personalisation is often viewed as a mechanism to better serve diverse user needs, the effects of sustained interactions with personalised models on people's perception of and behaviour toward AI remain poorly understood. Most critically, downstream consequences outside the immediate human--AI interaction loop, such as effects on users' self-perceptions and interpersonal relationships, remain largely unexamined. In this study, we recruited 992 participants to complete daily advice-seeking interactions with language models over the course of five days, comparing outcomes from a non-personalised baseline against two personalisation approaches: memory-based (conditioned on prior conversational history) and survey-based (conditioned on information collected through a pre-study intake survey). We find that several changes in human-AI interaction over time are driven primarily by repeated exposure rather than personalisation itself. However, participants interacting with personalised models experienced differences in advice-seeking and information-sharing attitudes and behaviours: participants in the memory-based condition engaged in greater self-disclosure and rated the model as less creepy, while participants in the survey-based condition reported higher regret about having shared personal information with the AI. We conclude by highlighting the nuanced effects of different personalisation approaches on interaction outcomes, and discussing the implications of these findings for the responsible design and deployment of personalised AI systems.

Radiologists follow heterogeneous reporting practices. Two radiologists examining the same image and identifying the same clinical findings might nevertheless compose superficially distinct reports, varying in terminology, shorthand, formatting, and level of detail. These variations in reporting norms represent an under-appreciated obstacle in efforts to evaluate AI-based radiology report generation (RRG) models, where machine-generated reports are typically assessed based on their concordance with human-generated references. In this paper, we quantify the sensitivity of established evaluation metrics to variations in reporting practices, revealing impacts large enough to alter the rankings of models. We introduce a radiologist-informed taxonomy of variations in radiology reporting practice and a method (ReRef) that rewrites reference reports along the axes of our taxonomy while preserving clinical interpretation. For instance, when comparing the performance of nine RRG models on MIMIC-CXR using RadCliQ-v1, condensing the discussion of normal findings in the reference reports causes Libra to drop from first to second place while CheXOne rises from third to first. Our results suggest that many current metrics fail to decouple clinical interpretation from conformity to reporting practices and that choosing the ``right'' references that accurately reflect the desired reporting practices can be important in practice. To support future research, we release MIMIC-CXR-Ext-ReRef, a radiologist-validated dataset of 120 (original, alternative) reference report pairs derived from MIMIC-CXR.

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is changing how students learn, yet the roles of course context, cognitive reliance, evaluation literacy, and early reliance remain underexplored. Using survey responses from 118 students across 12 AI-related courses at our institution, we examined differences in GenAI use and perceived learning experiences. We identified four user clusters: high-use students reporting many benefits, light users reporting less reliance and fewer benefits, and two moderate-use groups reporting different levels of benefit. We also found significant differences between free- and premium-version users, single- and multiple-tool users, and students experiencing different instructor policies. In multivariable regression models, academic benefit was associated with early reliance and academic task support; positive impact was associated with cognitive reliance, academic task support, confidence in GenAI reliability, and instructor policy; and negative impact was associated with early reliance and attitudinal change. The association between early reliance and negative impact became stronger as evaluation literacy increased. Finally, perceptions of GenAI-enhanced learning appear to reflect cognitive, performance, and self-efficacy benefits, while concerns about stress and diminished critical thinking are associated with lower perceived learning benefits. These findings suggest that institutions need better policies to address such inequities so that institutions can enable students to benefit from increasingly capable AI systems.

Cultural upheavals impact many aspects of social life, and many studies have investigated their impact on language patterns. However, few investigations have isolated the impact of upheavals on individuals at scale in popular media. The current work evaluated millions of song lyrics spanning more than a century in search of within-artist and between-artist signals of distress from the Vietnam War, the terrorist attacks of 9/11, and COVID-19. Compared to a five-year baseline, rates of self-references - a marker of psychological distancing - were significantly reduced after the Vietnam War and September 11th. Cognitive processing terms were elevated post-upheaval vs. pre-upheaval, which indicated artists' increased attempts to make meaning from such massive disruptions. Content patterns corroborated these findings as artists wrote more about "life and freedom" (societal conditions) and less about "courtship and nightlife" (interpersonal connection) following the upheavals. Cultural upheavals modify individual and collective verbal behavior, demonstrating their far-reaching impact on society.

Large Language Models are now common in student assessment, but we know little about how student demographics affect their use. Sometimes, considering student demographics may be necessary -- for example, to improve readability for users with lower educational levels. However, it also risks being a cause of discrimination, e.g., when assigning lower scores to students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. We set up controlled prompts to test 1) explicit demographic effects, where we mention demographic details directly, and 2) implicit effects, where we use conversation history as a demographic signal. We test these settings in three tasks: Automated Essay Scoring, Formative Feedback, and Metalinguistic Question Answering. We test six state-of-the-art LLMs on these tasks. In both explicit and implicit cases, the models pick up on demographic cues and can change their scoring, feedback, and answers accordingly. We find that LLMs frequently adjust the readability of feedback to education levels when these are explicitly mentioned. On the other hand, implicit conditions produce unpredictable biases, such as in question answering, where responses from lower-education levels receive lower sentiment scores. Our results provide clear evidence of demographic sensitivity in LLMs for educational assessment tasks.

In various fields, such as medicine and marketing, accurately predicting individual treatment effects holds significant promise. However, achieving reliable predictions alone is often insufficient for making informed decisions; it is equally important to understand why the treatment effect is higher for some individuals than for others. To address this two-fold challenge of prediction and interpretation, we introduce an algorithm based on decision trees and random forests for estimating individual treatment effects. Our algorithm is simple: it operates exactly like a standard random forest, but with a different splitting criterion, and requires no additional workarounds such as double machine learning or orthogonalization as used in Generalized random forests. It handles observational studies with varying treatment propensities without requiring separate estimation of the full propensity function. This is achieved by combining two splitting criteria---one targeting heterogeneity in the treatment effect, the other targeting bias correction for the average treatment effect---which together improve split point selection and automatically distinguish confounders from features responsible for heterogeneity. As a result, interpretation follows directly from the fitted tree structure itself, that is, from which features the trees split on and with which split statistics, without requiring separate post-hoc analysis. For the theoretical analysis of this algorithm, we consider a change point model with step functions for potential outcomes and treatment propensity and provide insights into the theoretical underpinnings of our approach. Simulation studies show that our simple algorithm achieves comparable, and often better, prediction accuracy than existing methods, while substantially improving interpretability.

As the population ages, the number of patients with cardiovascular diseases continues to increase, highlighting the need for early detection before progression to severe and irreversible functional decline. Consequently, estimating cardiovascular biomarkers from non-invasive biosignals, such as photoplethysmography (PPG) and arterial pressure wave (APW) signals, has attracted increasing attention. These signals can be measured using wearable and cuff-type devices. Previous studies have used PPG and APW signals to estimate cardiovascular biomarkers. However, these signals exhibit strong similarities in both the temporal and frequency domains and primarily reflect peripheral and arterial pulse waveforms. Therefore, they may provide limited information about cardiac mechanical function. In contrast, the quantitative impact of additional biosignals, such as ballistocardiography (BCG), which reflect the body's minute mechanical responses to cardiac ejection, remains unclear. In this study, we generated synthetic PPG, APW, and BCG signals from a unified whole-body cardiovascular circulation model and evaluated the complementary contribution of BCG to probabilistic cardiovascular biomarker estimation. We estimated posterior distributions of cardiovascular biomarkers using neural posterior estimation and simulation-based inference. The results showed that adding BCG signals significantly improved estimation performance. Furthermore, even in ill-posed cases where PPG and APW alone produced multimodal posterior distributions, adding BCG yielded unimodal posterior distributions. These findings provide fundamental insights into signal selection for estimating cardiovascular dynamics.

An OpenReview bug in November 2025 broke anonymity at several conferences and prompted calls for open review, which motivate us to ask what shifting from blind to open would mean for authors. Analyzing over 18,000 reviewed submissions to ICLR 2026, split into de facto open and blind groups by arXiv preprint timing, we find that ratings rise with author reputation under both mechanisms, with a steeper slope under open review that is statistically significant, and that the open-blind difference is concentrated at the borderline ratings. The pattern holds across five reputation proxies (including institution, h-index, and citation count), three author-aggregation rules, and five definitions of the open window. A controlled simulation with five AI models as reviewers, holding the manuscript fixed and varying the author reputation, reproduces the effect. With claude-opus-5 as the reviewer, for example, rating rises by 0.5 points as the author moves from low to high reputation.

As large language models are increasingly deployed in sensitive domains, anonymizing input data to protect personally identifiable information has become a critical practice. However, the impact of this anonymization on model utility is not well understood. This paper presents a systematic empirical study of the trade-off between privacy and performance. We evaluate five prominent language models across eleven diverse benchmarks, comparing their performance on original versus pseudonymized inputs. Our results reveal that while anonymization generally degrades performance, the effect is highly nuanced. We find that more capable models, such as Qwen2.5-72B and GPT-4o mini, suffer the largest performance drops, suggesting a stronger reliance on specific entity information. The impact is also task-dependent: performance on TruthfulQA improves with anonymization, while retrieval-focused tasks like RGB experience a catastrophic decline. Further experiments show that reversible anonymization techniques that preserve entity uniqueness significantly outperform irreversible ones like redaction, and that explicitly prompting models about anonymization offers no discernible benefit. We conclude that anonymization is not a one-size-fits-all solution and must be co-designed with the model and task in mind to balance privacy and utility effectively. Our findings provide a crucial baseline for developing more robust, privacy-aware AI systems.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress across natural language processing (NLP) tasks, yet their capabilities degrade sharply for low-resource languages and dialectally diverse settings. Bangla, the world's sixth most spoken language, exemplifies this gap: existing resources overwhelmingly target Standard Bangla, leaving its regional dialects without the benchmarks needed to develop or evaluate dialect-aware systems. We address this gap with 5-Dialects-BN, the first multi-annotation Bangla dialect benchmark to align Romanized transliteration with dialectal text, Standard Bangla, English, and subjectivity labels across five regional varieties. The dataset comprises 6,000 manually annotated entries spanning five major dialects: Chittagong, Barisal, Noakhali, Sylhet, and Rangpur (Chittagong 1,900; Noakhali 1,500; Sylhet 1,200; Barisal 700; Rangpur 700), reflecting natural online availability. Each entry is enriched with five aligned annotations: the original dialectal text, a Romanized transliteration, an English translation, a Standard Bangla translation, and a subjectivity label (subjective vs. objective). Annotations were produced and cross-validated by native speakers and undergraduate linguistics students to ensure dialectal authenticity and semantic fidelity. The resulting resource supports a diverse suite of tasks, including dialect identification, dialect-to-standard normalization, machine translation, subjectivity classification, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (e.g., LoRA) of multilingual LLMs. By providing a standardized, multi-annotation benchmark, 5-Dialects-BN enables principled evaluation of LLMs on dialectally diverse Bangla and lays a foundation for further research in low-resource, dialect-aware NLP.

Sign Language Translation has advanced with deep learning, yet evaluations remain largely signer-dependent, with overlapping signers across train/dev/test. This raises concerns about whether models truly generalise or instead rely on signer-specific regularities. We conduct signer-fold cross-validation on GFSLT-VLP, GASLT, and SignCL, three leading, publicly available, gloss-free SLT models, on CSL-Daily and PHOENIX14T. Under signer-independent evaluation, performance drops sharply: on PHOENIX14T, GFSLT-VLP falls from BLEU-4 21.44 to 3.59 and ROUGE-L 42.49 to 11.89; GASLT from 15.74 to 8.26; and SignCL from 22.74 to 3.66. We also observe that in CSL-Daily many target sentences are performed by multiple signers, so common splits can place identical sentences in both training and test, inflating absolute scores by rewarding recall of recurring sentences rather than genuine generalisation. These findings indicate that signer-dependent evaluation can substantially overestimate SLT capability. We recommend: (1) adopting signer-independent protocols to ensure generalisation to unseen signers; (2) restructuring datasets to include explicit signer-independent, sentence-disjoint splits for consistent benchmarking; and (3) reporting both signer-dependent and signer-independent results together with train-test sentence overlap to improve transparency and comparability.

Trust-Hub reuses host circuits: several files differ mainly in the inserted Trojan. When gates from sibling variants enter both training and test folds, a detector can benefit from host logic it has already seen. We measure that effect instead of proposing another classifier. The corpus contains 49,124 gates from 16 netlists grouped into five host families. We left the parser, 36 gate features, class weighting, model settings, threshold, and family-level aggregation unchanged and altered one choice: the test boundary. The three settings draw test gates from the pooled corpus, withhold a complete netlist, or withhold every variant of one host. The choice matters. Random forest records F1/AP of 0.914/0.978 with pooled gates, 0.636/0.851 with one netlist held out, and 0.460/0.577 with a host family held out. XGBoost falls from 0.946/0.976 to 0.464/0.544 across the same comparison. Logistic regression loses AP, although its fixed-threshold F1 is not monotonic. Each family shows the same pooled-to-family direction. Feature removal, repeated model and simulator seeds, score normalization, parser-related exclusions, and a smaller sample change the size of the gap without reversing it. Aggregation also matters: a gate-weighted average is dominated by the larger ISCAS files, so the headline values give each host family one vote. Bootstrap and jackknife summaries keep the gap positive, but their folds reuse training families. We treat the five family rows as descriptive evidence rather than independent trials. Five host families are too few for a population claim, and the experiment says nothing about transfer to a new cell library or an industrial design. It supports a narrower conclusion: sibling benchmark variants can inflate apparent transfer. Benchmarks with several variants of one host circuit should report family-aware holdouts and all five family results beside pooled scores.

We investigate how vision-language models (VLMs) handle context-memory conflicts; that is, situations in which the model is given information in context that differs from what was stored parametrically during training. We document asymmetric biases: models tend to prefer in-context information about entities which appear in text, but prefer parametric information about entities which appear in images. We relate this asymmetry to the late representational alignment across modalities, showing that the longer processing time associated with resolving visual entities prevents the suppression of the model's usual factual recall mechanism, thus resulting in more parametric answers. Chain-of-thought reasoning does not appear to resolve the gap, but increasing the amount of visual information in the context does show an effect. These results illustrate the complexity of ensuring consistent behavior as models become increasingly multimodal and retrieval-augmented.

Instruction-tuned language models achieve strong performance across a range of generation tasks, but have also recently been shown to exhibit verbalized overconfidence. In question answering, verbalized model overconfidence may be associated with the consistency of the generated supporting rationales. In this paper, we study whether corresponding changes in the lexical diversity of generated answer rationales accompany changes in model confidence induced by instruction tuning. We evaluate three matched base and instruction-tuned models across question-answering benchmarks and find that instruction tuning consistently alters answer confidence, despite limited changes in predictive accuracy and decreases in likelihood-based calibration. Secondly, we observe a non-uniform effect of instruction tuning on rationale diversity: cross-rationale diversity consistently decreases, whereas surface-level lexical diversity varies in both direction and magnitude across models and benchmarks. Finally, we find that these differences persist after controlling for answer selection and rationale length, confirming that confidence and rationale diversity capture distinct effects of instruction tuning.

Audio effects (Fx) representation learning plays a key role in intelligent music production, including automatic mixing and Fx style transfer. Existing methods typically rely on dry or nearly dry references for effect modeling, yet truly unprocessed audio is rarely available in practice, as real recordings inevitably reflect the microphone, room acoustics, and preceding signal processing. Instead of pursuing absolute effect encodings, we argue that the relative effect distance between audio signals is more meaningful for real-world music production. Motivated by this, we propose RelFx, a contrastive learning framework that learns relative effect transformations from general audio collections without requiring dry references during representation training. Our approach uses a dual-branch Siamese encoder equipped with cross-attention and differential gating fusion to infer the shared effect transformation from a reference clip and an effect-processed, content-related clip. We further propose an antisymmetric fusion variant for bidirectional effect encoding, such that swapping the input order directly produces a nearly sign-reversed embedding, a property not explored in earlier work. Moreover, our dry-reference-free formulation eliminates the reliance on dry multitrack datasets and enables training on effect-bearing audio. Experiments on Fx style transfer demonstrate state-of-the-art performance under the standard Fx-Encoder++ MUSDB18 evaluation protocol, consistently outperforming existing approaches across all four instrument categories.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as costly, on-demand components in real systems, but calling them indiscriminately can waste substantial compute, latency, and serving budget. The key deployment question is therefore not only whether an LLM helps on average, but when it is worth calling. We identify a common failure mode, which we call acquisition collapse: an LLM signal can appear useful in aggregate or post hoc, yet still provide too little before-call information to support reliable selective use. We introduce RAISE (Reward-SNR Actionability in Signal Evaluation), a pre-routing diagnostic framework for testing whether available evidence supports selective use before committing to a routing strategy. We instantiate RAISE with Structured Hypothesis Embeddings (SHE), a frozen-LLM intent signal for recommendation using one LLM call per user, and evaluate it through controlled, retrospective, and fresh-cohort studies and a prospective offline pilot whose audit decisions are frozen before independent outcomes are revealed. Across these settings, predictable incremental benefit, not average lift alone, distinguishes settings with recoverable selective value; deployment additionally depends on cost and operational constraints. Seemingly strong oracle or subgroup gains can disappear under independent evaluation. More broadly, RAISE reframes costly inference as an information-acquisition problem: before paying for an expensive model, tool, sensor, or measurement, first test whether its value is predictable at decision time. This principle motivates cost-aware acquisition in settings ranging from agent tool use and stronger-model consultation to robotic sensing and clinical decision pipelines.

As large language models increasingly participate in scientific evaluation, we investigate a potential form of reward hacking: how rhetorical choices shape AI-review judgments when reported scientific content is preserved and how these effects vary across evaluation conditions. We construct a controlled corpus of 4,200 full-paper manuscripts derived from 120 anonymized ICLR 2026 submissions. Two LLM rewriters transform six rhetorical dimensions in opposing directions, and five LLM reviewers evaluate the resulting manuscripts under standard and strict protocols. We also test joint, recursive, and reviewer-guided rewriting. Our results show that rhetorical sensitivity is structured rather than uniform. Evidence framing and novelty stance produce the largest positive-negative contrasts in overall assessment, with scope framing forming a weaker second tier; the remaining dimensions have smaller or less stable effects. This hierarchy persists across human-assessed quality levels, but score movement depends strongly on the AI reviewer's original score: lower scores tend to rise, higher scores tend to fall, and directional contrasts are clearest in the middle ranges. More elaborate workflows do not reliably yield larger gains. Joint rewriting is strongly rewriter-dependent, reviewer guidance does not consistently outperform an unguided second pass, and repeated rewriting yields diminishing, configuration-dependent returns. Across conditions, the rewriter primarily determines the separation between opposing variants, whereas the reviewer determines the magnitude and sign of their score effects. Strict review lowers mean OA by 1.36 points without consistently changing rhetorical sensitivity. These findings identify when rhetorical presentation influences AI scientific review and motivate evaluation systems robust to content-preserving variation in scientific writing.

For safety-critical software, data from the software's operational past (e.g. a sequence of success and failure events experienced by the software) can provide strong statistical support for reliability claims about the software. However, such data might not describe past software failure events in sufficient detail, and this might leave a reliability assessment (based on this data) unable to account for important features of past software failures. In this paper, by extending conservative Bayesian inference (CBI) techniques used in reliability assessment, we illustrate a principled statistical approach for checking the robustness of reliability claims derived from insufficiently detailed operational data. We demonstrate the extent to which insufficient detail in operational data can undermine software reliability claims in autonomous vehicle (AV) safety assessment scenarios. Reliability claims derived from insufficiently fine-grained data might be dangerously optimistic, despite a concerted effort by an assessor to use such data conservatively during the assessment. While these findings are consistent with previous work on the impact of statistical model fidelity in Bayesian software reliability assessments, our work clarifies why attempts to use low-fidelity data conservatively can be naive, and we give the first conservative estimates of the impact of data fidelity on assessments.

Estimating counterfactual outcomes over time from longitudinal observational data is central to clinical decision support. Existing methods rely on domain confusion -- adversarial training that renders representations invariant to treatment assignment -- yet this invariance creates a mutual information conflict: it suppresses treatment-correlated covariate signals necessary for accurate outcome prediction. We formalise this tension via a Jensen-Shannon divergence bound on counterfactual prediction error and develop two complementary models. CSSD (Causal State-Space model with Direct decoder) adapts selective State Space Models with a parallel multi-step decoder that eliminates accumulated rollout error by producing all prediction horizons simultaneously in a single forward pass. CSSPD (Causal State-Space model with Predictive regularisation and Direct decoder) augments CSSD with Contrastive Predictive Coding and Local Information Maximisation to reinforce temporal predictability in the balancing representation and recover local covariate information destroyed by domain confusion. On MIMIC-III, CSSPD achieves lower counterfactual RMSE than the Causal Transformer at every horizon tau >= 2 at O(T) encoder cost, with gains from 0.02 (2-step) to 0.07 (6-step). On Cancer Simulation across confounding strengths gamma in {0,1,2,3,4}, CSSPD outperforms CT at gamma <= 3 (margins 25.9%--37.0%), and CSSD achieves the lowest overall average RMSE (12.7% reduction over CT), confirming the MI conflict analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first work to formalise the balancing-prediction MI conflict and propose a structured resolution through complementary predictive and information-theoretic training objectives.

Recent data protection laws have accelerated the adoption of Federated Learning (FL) for privacy-preserving decentralized training. Nevertheless, increasing model sizes impose substantial computational demands on client devices, limiting FL applicability in resource-constrained settings. We introduce a novel multi-domain federated learning framework in which lightweight client-side proxy models collaborate with a server-side Foundation Model (FM) to learn new concepts without sharing private data. Our approach, EFFEKT, enables efficient server-side training of domain-specific LoRA adapters while preserving feature-space alignment between the FM and proxy extractors via novel bi-directional cross-distillation strategies. Experiments on multiple real-world datasets and deployments on low-power edge devices demonstrate improvements over state-of-the-art baselines in most considered domains while maintaining lightweight computation at the client side.

Randomized experiments are often run in one population to guide decisions in another. Allocating by experimental proportions wastes budget on groups that rarely appear in deployment, whereas allocating by deployment proportions under-samples groups that are hard to measure precisely. We propose \textbf{TWNA} (Target-Weighted Neyman Allocation), a two-stage stratified design that uses pilot estimates of group--arm outcome variances to allocate final-stage sample sizes and treatment probabilities for target-weighted group average treatment effect (GATE) precision. The oracle rule has a closed form and balances deployment importance with statistical difficulty; the plug-in rule recovers it as pilot variance estimates stabilize. We also extend TWNA to handle uncertainty about deployment composition, remaining robust whether the target mix is roughly known or entirely unknown. Finally, we distinguish this weight robustness from a pilot-robust variant for skewed, rare-event, or contaminated outcomes. Simulations and real-covariate benchmarks show the largest gains when groups are both deployment-important and difficult to measure.

Service robots operate in household environments shared with humans, pets, and everyday objects, where they are highly susceptible to failures such as software crashes, hardware degradation, or unpredictable interactions. While roboticists strive to minimize failures, some remain inevitable, making it critical to mitigate their potential consequences for safe and reliable deployment. This paper introduces a novel safety formulation that evaluates both the probability of impactful interactions between robots and surrounding entities during failures, and the severity of their outcomes. By quantifying the impact of failures on different entities, our approach enables robots to make informed planning decisions that balance safety with task efficiency. To support systematic evaluation, we also present FailBench, a MuJoCo-based simulation framework for studying robot-environment interactions under diverse failure modes, including sensing issues and actuator malfunctions. Together, our safety formulation and FailBench provide a foundation for developing safer and more robust motion plans and learned policies in real-world household environments.

Electroaerodynamic propulsion is compelling for use in micro air vehicles due to its silent and solid-state nature, but its limited efficiency has thus far precluded a path towards power-autonomous flight. Recent work has shown that thrust density and efficiency for small-scale atmospheric ion thrusters can be vastly increased when operating close to a ground plane. Here, we explore the design space of centimeter-scale hovercraft, which can leverage this ground effect for low-altitude flight. We first perform an empirical investigation, characterizing the performance benefits and trade-offs for different geometries and configurations of passive hovercraft skirts, then use the results to fabricate a viable point design. We demonstrate a palm-sized hovercraft that, while tethered to an external power source, can fly for extended periods, withstand dozens of takeoff and landing cycles, passively stabilize to reject significant mechanical disturbances, and generate practically zero audible noise signature. The measured thrust efficiency of 16 mN/W and additional payload capacity of almost 1.5 grams above the vehicle's self mass of about 1.6 grams exceeds any similarly sized electroaerodynamically propelled robot by an order of magnitude. This is the first time an ion-propelled micro hovercraft has been shown in the open literature, and our work points the way towards an entirely new class of robot.

Ubiquitous companion robots offer a promising avenue for immediate anxiety relief in children, yet their effectiveness relies on the ability to monitor physiological states continuously and unobtrusively. Current solutions often depend on external wearables, which impose usability barriers and limit the robot's autonomy. This paper investigates the integration of an embedded photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor directly into a pocket-sized companion robot, AffectaPocket, to enable self-contained heart rate monitoring during tactile interaction. We address the significant challenge of motion artifacts inherent in handheld usage by implementing a two-stage filtering pipeline that utilizes an onboard Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) to reject high-variance segments and a confidence-based smoothing algorithm for recovery periods. We evaluated the system against a commonly used wrist worn sensor in a Within-Subjects Study with 26 participants. Our results demonstrate that the filtering strategy significantly reduced the Mean Absolute Percentage Error and achieved statistical equivalence to the ground truth measurements (p<0.05). Analysis of short-duration interactions shows that the sensor requires stability over longer periods to converge.

Sound effects play a crucial role in conveying actions, events, and environmental cues across digital applications, often requiring a high degree of variation and contextual adaptability. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven audio generative models are rapidly growing in popularity and have the potential to transform the way sound is synthesized and used across various applications. In response to this growing momentum, this chapter reviews and analyzes recent AI-based generative models for sound effect synthesis, with a focus on how different input modalities (text, visual, audio, and multimodal) affect the quality, controllability, and contextual relevance of the generated audio. It examines 30 peer-reviewed articles sourced from Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and the ACM Digital Library, exploring the evolution of AI generative models over the past five years. The results show that multiple models achieved state-of-the-art performance, producing high-fidelity, semantically aligned, and increasingly temporally coherent sound effects across tasks. However, despite these advances, the review identifies persistent challenges, including limitations in temporal synchronization for complex multi-event scenarios, gaps between objective metrics and human perception, and trade-offs between controllability and generative diversity. Overall, the chapter highlights that AI-driven sound effect generation is progressing toward more adaptive, scalable, and context-aware systems, offering significant implications for future sound design workflows and interactive media applications.

This work revealed a relationship between a multi-objective optimization problem and single-objective optimization problems that exist in the multi-objective problem. This work focused on combinatorial problems and investigated the relations between the local optima networks of the single-objective problems and the Pareto optima network of the multi-objective problem. Each of their networks has a graph structure. We divided the entire network into subgraphs. Each subgraph was called a component and characterized by overlapping relations between the single-objective local optima networks and the multi-objective Pareto optima network. Results on multi-objective landscape problems showed that most Pareto optimal solutions were reachable from the single-objective local optimal solutions. This tendency was emphasized by increasing the number of objectives and the objective correlation. The number of co-variables impacted the number of cross-link relations between the single-objective local optima networks and the multi-objective Pareto optima network. The results suggested that searching for single-objective problems is a clue to multi-objective optimization.

Federated learning (FL) is a popular distributed learning framework where multiple clients perform local training and a server aggregates the locally updated models. FL enables decentralized training while preserving the privacy of clients' datasets. However, non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) or noisy datasets can lead to low model accuracy or high convergence latency. Precluding these clients through client selection may mitigate the problem, but heavily biased client selections may also degrade the learning performance. In this study, we first experimentally measure the impact of non-IID data (including skews in data quantity and label distribution), noisy data, and fairness in client selection on model accuracy and convergence. We then propose a privacy-preserving scoring method to assess each client's contribution in FL, with experiments conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed assessment.

Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects is central to targeted interventions, such as personalized promotions and precision medicine. We focus on the conditional average treatment effect (CATE), a standard estimand for characterizing such heterogeneity. Even under standard identification conditions, finite-sample CATE estimation requires learning the nuisance structure for covariate adjustment and treatment-effect heterogeneity, often together with an effective representation of X. Raw numerical and categorical encodings can leave semantic relations and higher-order interactions implicit, making this joint task locally unstable. A motivating study further shows that this instability appears through partially separable assignment- and heterogeneity-side channels. Building on this observation, we propose CURL (Causal Uncertainty-guided Representation Learning), a plug-in adapter that uses estimator uncertainty to allocate pretrained semantic capacity to locally unstable units. CURL queries a frozen LLM through two role-conditioned prompts, constructs assignment- and heterogeneity-oriented representations from the observed covariates, and routes them through separated pathways. On four benchmarks, CURL improves ten host learners in most settings, while ablation, refinement-dynamics, route-reassignment, and probe analyses support the intended design and roles of the two channels.

Falls represent a critical public health challenge, and accurate detection of the impact moment when an individual hits the ground is crucial for timely intervention. Existing skeleton-based methods rely on graph neural networks modeling only pairwise joint connections, failing to capture multi-joint coordination characteristic of fall impacts, while transformer-based temporal models suffer from quadratic complexity limiting real-time deployment. We propose FLASH, a novel framework integrating single-matrix hypergraph representations with Mamba's selective state-space models through adaptive feedback mechanisms for efficient impact detection. Our approach constructs biomechanically-grounded hyperedges to model functional joint coordination while leveraging Mamba's linear-time complexity to capture temporal dynamics. Experiments on UP-Fall and UMAFall datasets demonstrate that FLASH achieves state-of-the-art accuracy with real-time inference capability and strong zero-shot cross-dataset generalization, while significantly reducing computational cost compared to dual-representation and transformer-based methods. The model provides interpretable feedback through learned attention patterns aligned with biomechanical principles. Code is available at https://github.com/Tresor-Koffi/FLASH-Impact-Fall-Detection.

Fall represents a significant risk of accidental death among individuals aged over 65, presenting a global health concern. A fall is defined as any event where a person loses balance and moves to an off-position, which may or may not result in an impact where the person hits the ground. While fall detection systems have achieved good results in general, impact detection within falls remains challenging. This study proposes an efficient methodology for accurately detecting impacts within fall events by incorporating 3D joints skeleton data treated as a graph using Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks (STGCN), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) layers. By pinpointing impact moments, our approach enhances precision by distinguishing between false falls and actual impacts, contributing to better healthcare resource allocation. Our methodology, evaluated using the improved 3D skeletons UP-Fall dataset, achieves accuracy exceeding 90% across various fall scenarios. We have made this improved dataset publicly available at https://zenodo.org/records/12773013 to facilitate further research.

Activation steering modifies a language model by adding a learned direction to its hidden activations, enabling targeted behavioral changes without retraining. While effective, steering often produces unintended side effects on other behaviors, making it difficult to deploy safely. We therefore ask: can these side effects be forecasted before steering is applied? We answer this question by constructing a cross-effect matrix over a taxonomy of 67 behaviors across three open-weight language models. We find that side effects are common, structured, and often asymmetric, revealing interactions that cannot be explained by existing similarity-based heuristics. Despite this complexity, we show that side effects are largely predictable before steering is performed. Their magnitude depends primarily on the target behavior, while their direction can be forecasted from the model's unsteered representations with substantially higher accuracy than simple baselines. Our results demonstrate that activation steering has systematic and forecastable side effects, enabling proactive safety auditing and more informed deployment of steering interventions.

This paper studies the behavior of language models in a multi-agent crowd simulation, focusing on how affect propagates among agents that perceive and appraise one another. Each agent perceives its neighbors through visual, auditory, and tactile channels, then appraises these perceptions in light of its prompted personality profile, memory, current affective state, and situational context. Appraisal is carried out by an LLM, which updates the agent's internal affective state and selects its outward expression. The architecture contains no hand-authored mechanism for directly transferring affective state between agents; instead, inter-agent influence arises through the perception-appraisal-expression loop. The agent representation draws on the Big Five personality model and Russell's circumplex model of affect. To limit latency, low-level steering and navigation are handled by a conventional crowd simulator operating independently of the LLM-based cognitive layer. We evaluate the architecture across five scenario environments spanning alarming, joyful, and neutral situations in different spatial layouts. The results show that the system produces emotional contagion dynamics with spatial, temporal, and personality-dependent structure in sparse, small crowds. Alarm spreads from seeded agents as a traveling front, the mean alarmed fraction settles at a nonzero plateau, and the distribution of prompted personality profiles determines whether an ambiguous alarm ignites panic and whether a provocation is interpreted as anger or fear. We further evaluate the appraisal step through controlled experiments across prompt variants, sampling temperatures, and four model backends, showing that the dynamics are backend-dependent.

Radio Frequency Fingerprinting (RFFP) has emerged as a promising approach for device authentication by exploiting hardware-specific impairments embedded in transmitted signals. Yet existing methods largely overlook a major drawback: RFFP sensitivity to temperature--a critical factor influenced by both internal and environmental conditions--which can significantly alter device signatures and degrade classification performance. In this paper, we propose a novel temperature-aware RFFP framework that explicitly incorporates device temperature information into the learning process to improve robustness and generalization. We evaluate the proposed method on a real-world Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) dataset collected across multiple devices and environmental conditions. Experimental results demonstrate that temperature-aware modeling consistently outperforms other temperature mitigation baselines, achieving significant improvements in classification accuracy, particularly under unseen temperature and environmental conditions.

Background: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate code review, but the reasoning behind their decisions remains hard to understand. Developers struggle to assess the validity of LLM-generated reviews, making it difficult to gauge how much trust to place in them. The role of Explainable AI (XAI) in code review and its impact on trust remain underexplored. Objective: We study the influence of XAI on developer trust in AI-assisted code reviews. Method: We conducted a within-subjects user study with 34 participants, comparing three LLM-based code review systems with varying levels of XAI support: Condition A (detailed explanation and review feedback), Condition B (review feedback only), and Condition C (no explanations). Participants reviewed real-world code change requests alongside the AI-generated reviews. We measured trust perceptions, agreement with the AI recommendation, the reasoning given for each decision, and the time taken. Results: The level of explanation significantly influences both trust and agreement with AI recommendations, but in different ways. Full explanations (A) yield the highest perceived trust (M = 3.99/5) but not the highest agreement, whereas moderate explanations (B) achieve the highest agreement (89.22%). This could suggest that more explanation prompts developers to question AI recommendations more frequently. No explanations (C) results in the lowest trust and agreement. Explanation level did not significantly affect review time. The most commonly cited reasons for decisions were code readability and correctness. Conclusion: Incorporating XAI into code review significantly changes trust perceptions and agreement with AI recommendations. These results inform the design and evaluation of trustworthy AI-based code review systems, as well as studies on the human factors of AI-assisted software development.

In clinical oncology studies, metastatic cancer is commonly evaluated using "Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors" (RECIST), in which the diameter of up to five lesions is measured and followed over the course of treatment. However, RECIST shows limited correlation with overall survival. Total tumour volume (TTV) is a stronger predictor but typically relies on manual ground-truth segmentation of all lesions, which is time-consuming and requires expert domain knowledge. Semi-automated approaches leveraging user-prompted priors, such as bounding boxes and single-slice contours, as inputs to automated segmentation methods can facilitate the generation of ground-truth segmentations. This work investigates the impact of different user-prompted priors on semi-automated cancer lesion segmentation performance in whole-body computed tomography. Across 3-fold cross-validation and external testing, more complex spatial priors consistently improved performance, with contour priors from three orthogonal planes (axial, coronal and sagittal) achieving the best results. On the external test (n=3865 lesions), this approach achieved a mean Dice score of 0.882, compared to a mean Dice score of 0.671 for the baseline model with no spatial prior. These findings suggest that the use of multi-plane orthogonal user-prompted priors can improve semi-automated tumour lesion segmentation and support efficient generation of high-quality volumetric ground-truth data.

Existing research on affect in speech has shown how acoustic surface characteristics and content-related linguistic aspects of speech both relate to perceived emotional arousal and valence. However, it is not clear what the relative contributions of these two factors are in the perceptual process. This is especially true for Finnish, for which most existing studies focus on either acoustic-phonetic or text analysis. This paper presents a study where we systematically explore the combinatory role of text- and audio-based features in modeling the human perception of valence and arousal using a newly released affective speech corpus for spontaneous Finnish. We show that the combination of text- and audio-based features improves valence regression results over the individual modalities, whereas for arousal regression the complementary effect is not substantial. The results support prior findings from other languages, providing new data and knowledge on spontaneous Finnish speech.

Post-training quantization (PTQ) has become a practical solution for deploying deep learning models on resource-constrained edge devices by compressing high-precision floating-point weights into low-precision representations without requiring retraining. Past research has demonstrated that quantization largely preserves classification accuracy; however, whether it also preserves the model's internal reasoning remains an open question. This study presents a systematic evaluation on how static PTQ affects the interpretability / explainability of five widely used CNN architectures: VGG19, ResNet18, EfficientNet-B0, DenseNet161, and MobileNetV2 at INT8 and INT4 precision. We employ a dual interpretability framework that combines Grad-CAM for spatial attention analysis with LIME for input-level feature attribution, and systematically compare full-precision and quantized models on two binary classification datasets. Interpretability is evaluated using three complementary metrics: the Pearson correlation coefficient, structural similarity index, and top-20% IoU to capture distributional and structural variations in model explanations, supplemented by deletion/insertion faithfulness analysis. The results show that classification accuracy is not a reliable indicator of interpretability stability under reduced precision. DenseNet161 maintains strong feature consistency across both precision levels, whereas EfficientNet-B0, despite achieving competitive spatial attention and classification accuracy at INT8 precision, exhibits a substantial degradation in input-level feature attribution. These findings have direct implications for the trustworthy deployment of quantized models in applications with high interpretability requirements, demonstrating that architecture selection is as important as the quantization strategy.

Mastodon as a decentralized federation of independently moderated social servers poses unique challenges for the detection and mitigation of toxic content. There are no unified moderation standards. The ecosystem is very diverse and uneven. This paper explores the development and spread of toxicity in Mastodon, utilizing machine learning methods to examine user posts. The results offer clarity on toxicity trends and its implications for community health and decentralized governance.