Collaboration

We present TickingCollabBench, a Minecraft-based multi-agent benchmark for a novel class of time-sensitive complementary collaboration tasks. Our benchmark reflects four core characteristics of real-world collaboration: agent heterogeneity, mandatory collaboration, dynamic environments, and strict real-time constraints with failure risks. To enable this, we develop the TickingCollab framework, which supports the generation of diverse dynamic environments and abstracts Minecraft's primitive APIs to enable declarative YAML task specifications for composing these events. Building on this, we design a feasibility-aware automated benchmark generation pipeline, where an LLM drafts structurally diverse task configurations and feasibility verifier filters out invalid ones using approximate constraints. Evaluations demonstrate that lang latency and inherent difficulty of coordinating under partial observability and agent heterogeneity cause LLMs to frequently fail under dynamic environments and fall significantly short of a global-knowledge oracle.

When distributed agents exchange text across organizational boundaries, privacy leakage arises not only from explicit identifiers but also from distributional signatures such as formatting conventions, vocabulary choices, and syntactic patterns. We propose DiSan(Disentangled Sanitization), a privacy-preserving sanitization framework and a built-in component of Intern-Shannon for multi-agent collaboration. DiSan uses a two-stream encoder to factorize text into a source-invariant role subspace that preserves task semantics and a source-identifying style subspace that remains local. Federated proto-type alignment and adversarial regularization enable joint training without centralizing raw text. Experiments show that identifier-level masking is insufficient: masking 19.2% of tokens reduces TF-IDF stylometric attribution by only 18.6%. By contrast, DiSan reduces answer-level PII exposure by 20 times while maintaining 83% answer faithfulness on a distributed multi-agent RAG benchmark, and lowers Enron stylometric attribution by 73.2% under TF-IDF and 70.6% under a neural probe.

Large language models (LLMs) provide robots with richer task understanding and adaptability, making them promising for coordinating heterogeneous multi-robot systems in long-horizon tasks. Despite this potential, several challenges remain underexplored: (1) Centralized LLM schedulers scale poorly as team size and environmental complexity increase. A single model must process excessive contextual information, and long-context approximation may degrade reasoning quality; (2) Existing task formulations insufficiently consider dynamic settings, while robust adaptation to evolving task conditions is essential for real-world deployment; (3) Domain-specific data scarcity limits specialized robotic reasoning, making proprietary general-purpose models inefficient for expert tasks. To address these limitations, we propose DynaHMRC, a decentralized framework in which each robot acts as a role-aware LLM agent. This design mitigates the single-model context bottleneck and supports flexible collaboration across heterogeneous team configurations. DynaHMRC organizes collaboration as a four-stage closed-loop process: self-description, task allocation with leadership bidding, leader election, and reflective execution, supported by executable robot interfaces. We further develop a benchmark covering three task families, four dynamic variations, and six team configurations to systematically study dynamic task modeling. In addition, we conduct an empirical analysis to guide the construction of domain-specific expert datasets and fine-tune pretrained LLMs to improve specialized competence. Experiments show that DynaHMRC achieves higher success rates than strong baselines with fewer action and communication steps, while demonstrating promising scalability trends as team size grows within the evaluated settings.

Existing multi-agent software development systems have proposed many forms of agent collaboration, including role-based collaboration and automated code review. However, many systems assume a common runtime, a central conversation server, or the same API family. Under these assumptions, LLM agents from different vendors cannot easily exchange messages directly from their own execution environments while dividing development and review work on a shared codebase. This paper presents tap, a file-based collaboration protocol that allows Claude (Anthropic) and Codex (OpenAI) to collaborate on one codebase without shared memory or an identical runtime. The core of tap is a file-first design that preserves markdown files with metadata as original messages, combines a file inspection path (file communication, Tier 1) with real-time notification paths for Claude and Codex (real-time communication, Tier 2), and isolates work through separate git worktrees. Even if real-time notification fails or a receiver restarts, the message file remains available and the same content can be inspected again. In a 27-day, 37-generation self-applied operation where tap was used to develop and review itself, we collected 209 tap-related pull requests and 717 operational artifacts. An analysis of 375 review artifacts showed that the share of reviews recording at least one defect or requested change was 69.8% for heterogeneous model pairs and 53.1% for homogeneous model pairs. These results show that tap, which combines file-based message preservation with real-time notification, operates in a real production repository, and that combining heterogeneous models and execution environments can broaden review perspectives. tap is distributed as the open-source npm package @hua-labs/tap (v0.5.2).

Estimating cognitive load from speech has largely been studied in controlled laboratory settings, with limited understanding of its reliability in natural collaborative conversations. We investigate whether speech and interaction dynamics predict perceived cognitive load during dyadic conversations. We analyze audio from 53 dyads performing nine collaborative tasks and extract static acoustic, dynamic, and interaction features to train a two-head Gated Recurrent Unit encoder to predict cognitive load scores. Results show conversational interaction provides useful signals for predicting cognitive load related to time pressure, mental work, effort, and task performance. Temporal demand is associated with turn-taking dynamics such as overlap and speaker switch, while mental demand is linked to imbalanced participation between speakers. These findings highlight the importance of task structure and conversational interaction for modeling cognitive load in natural collaborative settings.

Collaboration is widely recognized as a cornerstone of 21st-century education, yet teachers still encounter persistent challenges in fostering productive peer interaction. LLM conversational peer agents introduce new possibilities for mediating in-person group work, raising questions about how persona design, particularly their voice characteristics, shapes learners' perceptions, trust, and interactional dynamics. While prior work has examined agent accent effects in one-to-one settings, little is known about how these effects manifest in groups. We conducted a between-subjects mixed-methods study with 33 teachers examining how a GenAI voice agent with different accents (British, Indian, and African American) influenced collaboration and agent perception. Across surveys, group interaction analyses, and artifacts, we find that accent shaped participants' mental models and the roles the agent assumed in group interaction. The British-accented agent was largely treated as a tool and engaged in detached, utility-based ways, whereas Indian- and African American-accented agents were more readily anthropomorphized and integrated as peers. These role expectations influenced trust, engagement, and reliance over time. This work advances understanding of how GenAI's sociolinguistic design features shape group dynamics in CSCL, with implications for designing culturally inclusive AI partners in group learning.

Effective multi-human-robot collaboration is essential for expanding human-led operations in the challenging and high-risk underwater environment. For autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) to become true teammates, they must be able to comprehend their surroundings and recognize a diver's activities to offer assistance and ensure safety. Towards this goal, we introduce DAR-Net, a novel transformer-based framework that analyzes complex underwater scenes to classify diver activities. Our contribution lies in a semantically guided learning formulation that couples transformer-based temporal reasoning with pixel-level scene supervision. This multi-loss training strategy explicitly aligns global activity recognition with local human-robot interaction semantics, which is particularly critical in low-visibility underwater conditions. To address the significant challenge of data scarcity in this domain, we present the first-ever Underwater Diver Activity (UDA) dataset, a foundational resource containing over 2,600 annotated images with pixel-level masks. Through rigorous experimental evaluations in a controlled environment, we demonstrate that DAR-Net achieves promising accuracy in recognizing six distinct diver activities, outperforming state-of-the-art models. While this dataset provides a crucial baseline, our work serves as a pioneering step, laying the groundwork for future research and facilitating the development of more intelligent, collaborative underwater robotic systems.

Multi-robot collaboration allows robots to efficiently take on a wide range of tasks, from moving a couch through a doorway to assembling structures on a construction site. However, achieving such coordination in mobile multi-robot settings remains challenging: centralized methods conditioned on the combined observations of a team scale poorly with team size, and decentralized methods that train one policy per robot often require explicit alignment procedures or information sharing at inference time to overcome partial observability. Our key insight is that the visuomotor priors of pretrained vision-language-action (VLA) models should enable reactive, decentralized collaboration from each robot's local observations alone, without these inference-time assumptions. We propose CHORUS, a framework that adapts a single VLA backbone to control diverse, multi-robot teams. At inference time, each robot runs an independent copy of CHORUS, conditioned only on its own observations and a robot-identifying prompt. In real-world experiments including mobile tape measurement, library book handovers, and laundry basket lifting, CHORUS achieves a 64% point improvement over decentralized, from-scratch models, improves reactivity to teammate behavior by 40% points, and outperforms centralized baselines. Together, these results show that a shared VLA backbone is capable of achieving decentralized multi-robot collaboration, without per-robot policies or inter-robot communication at inference.

Understanding human states and interaction dynamics is a core goal of human-computer interaction (HCI). As interaction paradigms become more immersive, virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a powerful platform for studying collaborative work. In such settings, evaluating team collaboration states, including team performance and team resilience, requires continuous and reliable inference of latent team-level cognitive and affective states from multi-modal sensor data, such as speech signals. However, generating ground truth labels for these latent states remains challenging due to sensor-induced noise, contextual variability, and sparse expert annotations. Traditional self-reporting approaches provide only static and delayed measurements and are therefore insufficient for capturing dynamic team processes reflected in continuous speech data. In this work, we propose a large language model (LLM)-driven, agentic inference workflow for automated emotion-related synthetic ground truth generation from streaming speech data in multi-user VR environments. Leveraging the generalization capabilities of LLMs, we use In-Context Learning (ICL) with few-shot demonstrations of paired audio-based samples and their corresponding transcriptions. ICL tends to achieve task adaptation comparable to model fine-tuning while circumventing the computational overhead of parameter updates. To construct informative and robust in-context prompts, we adopt a retrieval-based selection strategy that dynamically identifies relevant audio demonstrations based on similarity in the acoustic feature space.

Long-term action anticipation (LTA) aims to predict an ordered sequence of future verb-noun actions from a partially observed video. While this task serves as the foundation for embodied intelligence, anticipating physically feasible long-term actions remains a critical challenge. Existing methods, which operate in an open-loop manner, often hallucinate non-existent objects, violate object affordances, or disregard object states, as they lack explicit mechanisms to verify action feasibility against the physical environment. To address this, we propose FactCheck, a novel multi-agent collaboration framework that improves feasibility through a closed-loop "Observe-Plan-Verify" mechanism. FactCheck decomposes the complex LTA task into specialized roles: an Observer that recognizes historical actions from video observations and constructs a dual-form structured memory, comprising a History Action Abstract that captures high-level human intentions and environmental status, and a History Action Graph that encodes object states and temporal dependencies; a Planner that generates draft future actions conditioned on both low-level historical actions and high-level History Action Abstract; and a Verifier that rigorously validates the draft against the History Action Graph and refines infeasible actions. Extensive experiments on the EPIC-Kitchens-55 and EGTEA Gaze+ benchmarks demonstrate that FactCheck consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Our work establishes a new paradigm for feasibility-aware long-term action anticipation, effectively closing the loop of action recognition, action prediction and action verification.

Human-robot collaboration (HRC) combines the complementary strengths of humans and robots to improve task efficiency. However, many existing collaborative systems rely on hand-engineered pipelines, limiting their scalability and flexibility for new tasks. In this work, we show that models trained end-to-end with imitation learning, specifically vision-language-action (VLA) models, can support collaborative manipulation, and characterize the key factors affecting their real-world performance. We evaluate two state-of-the-art models and identify a failure mode of action-chunking policies in implicit HRC, where demonstration action leakage (i.e., action chunks crossing latent task transitions) can cause premature assistive behavior. We find that this issue increases with longer execution horizons and occurs in real-world collaborative VLA systems, such as when a robot attempts to hand over a tool before the person is ready. We propose an inference-time steering method to mitigate these erroneous assistive actions while preserving policy performance. Finally, through a 16-participant user study on a long-horizon collaborative assembly task, we show that steering enables a longer execution horizon while mitigating premature assistance, leading to faster collaboration and fewer failures compared to a shorter-horizon policy.

Constructing efficient and reliable policies to assist humans is indispensable for human-AI collaboration. Existing methods mainly follow two lines of work. Most prior work relies on multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) to learn black-box policies, which limits interpretability and raises safety concerns. Recent methods query large language models (LLMs) at each decision step, causing slow responses and high inference costs. We propose Collaboration Policy Tree (Co-pi-tree), a closed-loop method that learns an executable policy tree consisting of a partner-behavior prediction tree and an agent-action selection tree. Co-pi-tree constructs a policy by distilling LLM reasoning into policy tree code. It then evaluates the policy through partner interaction, obtains feedback, and uses natural language to summarize the interaction feedback to improve problematic branches. Experiments in Overcooked-AI show that Co-pi-tree improves average reward by 35.4% over the baseline average, while reducing the number of LLM queries by 77.7% and test-time latency by 97.1%. Project page: https://beiwenzhang.github.io/Co-pi-tree/

Multi-agent systems (MAS) built on large language models have shown growing promise, with their effectiveness resting on agents' ability to coordinate through text-based channels much as human teams do. Yet recent study suggests that MAS often falter not because agents lack individual task-solving ability, but because they lack collaborative competence: the capacity to establish common ground, maintain shared task understanding, balance individual and collective incentives, and repair misalignment as interaction unfolds. Decades of research in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work have characterized these requirements for human teams coordinating under constrained communication, yet existing MAS evaluations focus mainly on task outcomes or single-agent proficiency in reasoning, planning, and tool use. To enable a systematic analysis of agents' collaborative competence in MAS, we introduce CollabSim, a configurable simulation framework that combines a theory-grounded definition of collaborative capabilities, controlled manipulation of interaction conditions, and action-level probing of agents' internal states. Experiments across four LLMs show that CollabSim can capture condition effects, separate model performance patterns, and reveal task-dependent effects of agent design.

Recent advances in LLM agents have enabled complex cognitive capabilities, such as multi-step reasoning, planning, and tool use, that increasingly position these agents as human collaborators. Effective collaboration, however, requires collaborators to continuously maintain and align mental models of their own reasoning,partners' intentions, and shared goals during the collaborative process. Today's agents rarely develop such capabilities since they are primarily optimized for task completion, and the community lacks authentic human collaboration data with action-level mental model annotations that could guide agents toward process-level collaborative competence. To bridge this gap, we present ALMANAC, a dataset of Action-Level Mental model ANnotations for Agent Collaboration built from the Map Task, a classic dyadic routing task from social science. ALMANAC contains 2,987 collaboration actions, each paired with theory-informed mental model annotations that record the participants' self-reasoning, perceived partner intent, and perceived team goal. We benchmark six LLMs on predicting humans' next-turn behavior and mental models. Our results demonstrate ALMANAC's utility in evaluating models' ability to simulate human collaborative behaviors and infer their underlying mental models.

While LLM-based agents excel at individual tasks, effective collaboration with realistic human partners remains challenging. Most of the existing conversation-level collaborative studies lack grounded interaction and behavioral execution, motivating the need for cooperative game environments that enable contextualized and immersive collaboration. To this end, this paper proposes CollabBench, a benchmark for evaluating and training collaborative agents in cooperative games. CollabBench features a Diverse Player Profile Simulation pipeline to model varied players behaviors, and a Collaborative Agentic Training paradigm that unifies reasoning, communication, and action via agentic rollouts, optimized with a hybrid reward balancing task efficiency and affective adaptation. We further extend classic environments to CWAH-MultiPlayer and Cook-MultiPlayer for systematic evaluation under diverse personalities. Experiments with efficiency and affective metrics show that our trained models outperform base models, achieving 19.5% higher efficiency and 24.4% improved affective performance. Further analysis reveals key collaborative limitations of existing models and offers insights for future collaborative training.

Cancer care requires a longitudinal approach in which treatments are planned and delivered over time according to the needs of each individual patient. While prior research has thoroughly explored how clinical and demographic factors, such as comorbidities and age, inform treatment planning, far less attention has been devoted to the delivery phase of care. Yet planning and delivery are both team-based processes that depend on coordinated efforts among multiple healthcare professionals (HCPs). As such, the human factors embedded in these collaborative practices are crucial to optimizing patient outcomes. Despite this importance, the existing literature on human factors in cancer care is limited, and very few studies have investigated how collaboration within care teams evolves over the course of treatment. To fill this gap, this work examine how HCPs' collaboration, captured through electronic health record (EHR) systems, affects cancer patient outcomes, with particular emphasis on teamwork dynamics. We represent EHR-mediated HCP interactions as networks and apply machine learning methods to identify predictive signals of patient survival embedded in these collaborative structures. We further interpret model predictions by pinpointing network characteristics and dynamic patterns associated with particular outcomes. We evaluate our model through robustness analyses to ensure that the findings are stable and not driven by stochastic variation in training. Additionally, our insights align with hypotheses proposed in the medical literature, and our results provide the empirical, data-driven evidence supporting these claims. Overall, our work contributes a practical workflow for leveraging digital traces of collaboration to evaluate and strengthen longitudinal team-based healthcare, offering actionable insights to guide data-informed interventions in healthcare delivery.

Collaborative perception extends the perceptual range of autonomous vehicles by sharing information across agents, but heterogeneous sensors and perception models make intermediate feature fusion difficult to deploy at scale. Existing heterogeneous collaboration methods typically follow a translation-first paradigm: collaborator features must be aligned, adapted, or projected into an ego-compatible space before fusion. Such feature-compatibility contracts improve fixed-system performance, but they couple deployment to collaborator-specific adaptation and make newly joined heterogeneous agents costly to integrate. To address this gap, we propose INTACT, an ego-guided typed sparse evidence retrieval framework for heterogeneous collaborative perception. Instead of translating an entire collaborator feature map, INTACT lets the ego vehicle issue typed evidence queries that express suspected objects and evidence-deficient regions. Collaborators respond only with local evidence at queried locations, and the ego selects useful responses through sparse per-query routing and injects them through gated residual write-back. This changes the compatibility requirement from global feature-map interpretability to local, typed response comparability under ego-issued queries, enabling a zero-training heterogeneous insertion protocol in which the ego interface is trained once and new collaborators join through checkpoint merging. Extensive experiments on simulated and real-world heterogeneous collaborative perception benchmarks validate the effectiveness and deployability of INTACT. On OPV2V-H, INTACT achieves 80.1 AP70 with only 0.52M additional parameters and 18.0 $\log_2$ communication volume, corresponding to about 16$\times$ compression over dense feature transmission. On DAIR-V2X, INTACT achieves 43.8 AP50 under challenging real-world conditions.

We present a controlled experiment evaluating 12 multi-agent LLM collaboration topologies for software architecture design. Using a $2\times2\times2$ factorial design (Authority $\times$ Roles $\times$ Dynamics), we conducted 520 experimental runs across 8 design tasks of varying complexity, with 5 repetitions each. Designs were evaluated on a 12-dimensional rubric by three independent automated evaluators (GPT-OSS 120B, Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Sonnet 4.6). We report four core findings. First, structural adversarial (v4b) ranks #1 by ensemble -- a prompt-engineered adversarial variant that demands rewrite mandates rather than patches (weighted ensemble: 4.637/5.0). Second, cross-model review wins unanimously at #2 -- generate with one model, review with another -- ranking #2 by all three evaluators (weighted ensemble: 4.606). Third, evaluator diversity is itself a finding -- all three evaluators agree v4b is best and v3 is worst, but disagree sharply on v2b (Claude d=1.44 vs. GPT-OSS d=0.45), revealing how different model families weight design qualities. Fourth, parallel merge is fundamentally broken -- all three evaluators place merge variants in the bottom tier (3.65-3.79), due to token starvation and the Frankenstein effect. The weighted ensemble ($2\times$Opus + $2\times$Sonnet + $1\times$GPT-OSS) provides robust rankings across 520 runs, confirmed through independent cross-validation.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied across educational contexts to support learning. One approach to such support is "human-AI collaboration" (also termed "hybrid intelligence"), where human(s) and AI components interact to promote human learning. However, as in human-to-human computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), unstructured interaction does not necessarily produce an effective learning experience. This paper reports a systematic literature review of empirical studies (N=62) on human-AI collaboration and hybrid intelligence for learning support. The review characterizes collaboration processes, their structures, and contexts of application. It also extracts emerging design knowledge and research gaps. Researchers and technology designers can use these findings as a starting point for structuring more effective AI-enhanced technologies for collaboration, in educational practice and future research.

Modular visual reasoning systems increasingly rely on shared working memory for multi-step collaboration, yet the failure dynamics of intermediate state evolution in low-capacity regimes remain underexplored. We study failure modes of collaborative reasoning with weak learners (4B--8B models) through the lens of noise accumulation. We introduce CoSee, an auditing framework that formalizes the read-write-verify loop to trace information flow in document visual question answering. Across multi-page, chart, and web-based benchmarks, we find a counter-intuitive degradation: naive shared workspaces often amplify hallucinations rather than resolve them. We identify two dominant failure modes: Noise Reinforcement, where ungrounded notes are reused as evidence, and Policy Collapse, where added context shifts the model toward under-specified, short-form answers. Using cost-accuracy Pareto frontiers, we show that increased compute can correlate negatively with performance without explicit verification. Our findings suggest that for resource-constrained agents, the bottleneck lies not in reasoning depth but in communication fidelity, providing trace-level diagnostics and a mechanistic baseline for reliable modular design.

We present FRUC, a feed-forward 3D Gaussian splatting framework for dynamic scene reconstruction from uncalibrated collaborative driving views. Existing multi-agent reconstruction frameworks are often hindered by rigid prerequisites, demanding precise spatial calibration and slow per-scene optimization. In this paper, we rethink this task by conceptualizing a distributed multi-vehicle network as a spatio-temporally unstructured ego-centric multi-camera system, where the core challenge lies in enhancing ego-centric occluded geometry through collaboration without degrading the ego's accurately observed visible geometry, while preserving reconstruction efficiency. For efficient reconstruction, FRUC is built upon a visual grounded geometric Transformer backbone to enable one-shot, calibration-free inference from a flexible number of multi-vehicle views. To achieve non-destructive geometric supplementation under uncalibrated cross-agent misalignment, FRUC first introduces an ego-centric causal occlusion field that explicitly derives occlusion evolution as latent priors by modeling agent-wise spatio-temporal correlations. Guided by these occlusion priors, it further formulates cross-agent integration as a deterministic residual denoising process via zero-initialized injection, turning challenging cross-agent fusion into bounded residual learning for robust collaborative blind-spot completion. Through extensive evaluations on the real-world V2XReal and UrbanIng-V2X datasets, FRUC is shown to be a new state-of-the-art for the scene reconstruction of dynamic collaborative driving environments, significantly outperforming existing methods in both rendering quality and efficiency.

Collaborations with Generative AI often begin with a short prompt and end with an opaque output, leaving implicit who was involved, what task was being pursued, which resources were used, and which constraints should have shaped the process. This limited contextual explicitness hinders trust, traceability, and accountability, particularly when Generative AI is embedded in information-intensive workflows such as search, querying, and profile management. This paper introduces From Prompts to Context, an ontology-driven framework for representing Human-Generative AI collaboration. Its core component, the Contextual Collaboration AI Ontology (CCAI), models key elements of collaboration - including tasks, agent roles, resources, and constraints - as a shared machine-interpretable vocabulary. By combining populated CCAI instances with SPARQL-based context retrieval in operational workflows, the framework turns otherwise ephemeral prompt-response interactions into structured and queryable collaboration traces linking prompts, outputs, and their surrounding context. The approach is illustrated through a case study involving a software development team building a competency-based education feature for viewing and updating learner competency profiles. The case study shows how the framework can support the representation and documentation of collaboration episodes across requirements analysis, design, implementation, and testing. Within this setting, the results indicate that explicit collaboration modelling helps make task context more explicit, improves the traceability of AI-generated contributions, and supports more transparent and accountable Human-Generative AI practices. We conclude by outlining design principles for future Human-Generative AI systems that emphasise not only output quality, but also the explicit representation of the collaborative context in which outputs are produced.

Although large language model (LLM) based multi-agent systems (MAS) show their capability to solve complex tasks and achieve higher performance over single agent systems, they lead to huge computational overheads because of heavy communication between agents. Previous research has made efforts to train a sparse multi-agent graph or fine-tune a planner to orchestrate the workflow better. However, such extra training processes introduce computational costs and limit MAS to specific domains, therefore compromising their generalizability. In this paper, we propose CONCAT, a training-free multi-agent collaboration framework based on CONsensus and Confidence-driven Ad hoc Teaming to efficiently organize agent interactions. Specifically, agents are clustered based on their initial answers, and leaders of each cluster are selected based on the agents' confidence. Then, a heuristic function based on the Theory of Mind is designed to predict the collaboration benefits between every two leaders according to their answers and confidence. Finally, an ad hoc multi-agent network is organized after evicting a percentage of communications based on the predicted benefits. Experiments across three LLMs and three benchmarks show that CONCAT achieves up to 2.02x higher efficiency (accuracy/latency ratio) than LLM-Debate and outperforms training-aware methods such as AgentDropout, while reducing average latency by 50.1% on Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct, without any task-specific training.

AI systems are fallible, and humans can make mistakes in deciding whether to trust AI over their own judgment. Thus, improving human-AI collaboration requires understanding when, why, and how humans decide to rely on AI. We study two distinct reliance decisions: the delegation choice -- deciding when to let AI act autonomously without knowing its output, and the adoption choice -- evaluating AI suggestions and deciding how to use them. Both of these decoupled reliance patterns shape collaboration, but prior work rarely studies them together in realistic settings with the same users. We address this gap by studying collaborative human--AI teams competing in a question-answering game in which humans can choose when and how to work with AI agents to win. Our 24 matches pair 23 expert humans with 16 AI agents, capturing 387 delegation and 1440 adoption decisions. While human--AI collaboration performs better than either AI or humans alone, humans make suboptimal collaboration decisions, both under-relying on correct AI suggestions (3.9% of opportunities missed) and over-relying when AI misleads them (1.7%). Both parties contribute wrong answers: reported model confidence is near chance when humans and AI disagree, while confirmation bias drives higher under-reliance (64.5%) when an AI suggestion agrees with humans' initial incorrect answer. To close this gap, we recommend calibrated confidence, evidence-grounded explanations, and mechanisms that help users refine trust.

Collaborative analysis of decentralized confidential datasets is important, but direct sharing of original datasets is often restricted by privacy and institutional constraints. Data collaboration (DC) analysis transforms each dataset into privacy-preserving intermediate representations via party-specific obfuscation functions and integrates them into common collaboration representations using an anchor dataset. However, many existing DC analysis methods rely on linear transformations for data obfuscation and integration, which may increase reconstruction risk. Although nonlinear dimensionality reduction can mitigate this risk, conventional linear integration methods cannot accurately align intermediate representations produced by nonlinear transformations. Moreover, existing integration methods mainly minimize discrepancies among parties and do not explicitly incorporate geometric or target-variable information useful for downstream analysis. To overcome these limitations, we first formulate linear kernel integration (LKI) as a linear integration method and then kernelize it to obtain nonlinear kernel integration (NKI). NKI admits a globally optimal solution via kernel ridge regression and an eigenvalue problem. We also introduce graph regularization and a centering constraint so that the target representation can capture geometric and target-variable information useful for downstream analysis. Experiments on image classification tasks demonstrate that NKI improves classification accuracy over existing linear integration methods under nonlinear dimensionality reduction, with further gains from target-variable-aware graph regularization and centering. The results also show that dimensionality reduction choices substantially affect both classification accuracy and reconstruction risk.

Collaborative perception improves 3D object detection by enabling agents to share complementary observations, but most existing methods assume fixed or known collaborator encoder configurations, limiting deployment in practice. In this work, we consider an open-world setting in which auxiliary agents with unseen configurations may appear after deployment, such as different LiDAR beam counts or encoder architectures. To address this challenge, we propose ALF, a collaborative perception framework that enables zero-adaptation collaboration with unseen agent configurations by lifting lightweight box-level messages into ego-compatible auxiliary features. ALF converts auxiliary box-level messages into pseudo-BEV maps and synthesizes ego-compatible latent features by combining object-centric cues with scene context from the ego feature. On V2X-Real, under a zero-shot evaluation across 64 case studies, ALF outperforms the strongest prior baseline by 35.91% in relative mAP@0.7 while requiring only 120 bytes per agent per frame (approximately 9.6 Kbps bandwidth at 10 Hz).

Large language models are widely deployed in high-stakes NLP tasks, yet risks such as bias, hallucination, adversarial vulnerability and unreliable generalization remain. Probe-based auditing reveals inconsistencies in model behavior. Adversarial text generation uncovers robustness gaps, especially in lower-resourced languages with limited benchmarks. Enterprise text-to-SQL settings expose the difficulty of validating outputs over private and large-scale databases. Human supervision is essential for probe validation, adversarial verification and domain-specific annotation, but it is costly and hard to scale. This survey examines recent human-in-the-loop methods that shift NLP from automation toward collaboration for safety and trustworthiness. We review how human expertise supports auditing, robustness evaluation, data construction and model steering. Our findings highlight gaps in scalable probing, sustainable robustness benchmarks, low-resource settings and governance of private systems. We outline practical research directions for adaptive auditing, collaborative evaluation and accountable deployment.

Speculative decoding (SPD) accelerates large language model (LLM) inference by letting a smaller draft model propose multiple future tokens that are verified in parallel by a larger target model. The dominant SPD paradigm treats the target model as the sole reliable teacher, accepting a draft token only when it exactly matches the target prediction. This design implicitly assumes that the target is always the better choice at every position. In practice, this assumption does not hold. Although the draft is the weaker model overall, it is not uniformly inferior at the token level. In a meaningful fraction of cases where draft and target disagree, the draft's choice is the one that leads to the correct final answer. Inspired by this, we introduce \textbf{Collaborative Speculative Decoding (CoSpec)}, a generalization of SPD that no longer treats the target model as the sole token-level authority. CoSpec trains an arbitration policy via reinforcement learning to decide whether to accept tokens from the draft or target model, selectively accepting draft tokens at mismatches when doing so is likely to yield a correct final answer. Experimental results show that CoSpec maintains substantial speedups while surpassing target-only performance. By shifting the emphasis from imitation to collaboration, CoSpec suggests a new perspective on speculative decoding.

Multi-agent collaboration, especially in human-AI teaming, requires agents that can adapt to novel partners with diverse and dynamic behaviors. Conventional Deep Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (DHRL) methods focus on agent-centric rewards and overlook partner behavior, leading to shortcut learning, where skills exploit spurious information instead of adapting to partners' dynamic behaviors. This limitation undermines agents' ability to adapt and coordinate effectively with novel partners. We introduce Partner-Aware Skill Discovery (PASD), a DHRL framework that learns skills conditioned on partner behavior. PASD introduces a contrastive intrinsic reward to capture patterns emerging from partner interactions, aligning skill representations across similar partners while maintaining discriminability across diverse strategies. By structuring the skill space based on partner interactions, this approach mitigates shortcut learning and promotes behavioral consistency, enabling robust and adaptive coordination. We extensively evaluate PASD in the Overcooked-AI benchmark with a diverse population of partners characterized by varying skill levels and play styles. We further evaluate the approach with human proxy models trained from human-human gameplay trajectories. PASD consistently outperforms existing population-based and hierarchical baselines, demonstrating transferable skill learning that generalizes across a wide range of partner behaviors. Analysis of learned skill representations shows that PASD adapts effectively to diverse partner behaviors, highlighting its robustness in human-AI collaboration.

Collaboration is the defining mode of modern science, yet its core mechanism -- feedback -- remains hard to observe, difficult to scale, and unequally distributed. Here we test whether large language models (LLMs) can contribute to this hidden but vital practice and reallocate scientific feedback, an essential yet scarce resource for knowledge production. In a global large-scale randomized field experiment, we delivered customized LLM-generated feedback for over 31,000 arXiv preprints across 150 fields and more than 45,000 researchers from 133 geographic regions. Relative to controls, authors who received feedback had a significantly higher likelihood of revising their manuscripts, corresponding to a 12.55% relative increase over the baseline revision rate. Exposure to AI feedback also increased authors' subsequent use of LLM tools in their future papers, suggesting longer-run shifts in scientific practice. These effects were strongest among authors from non-English-dominant research regions, manuscripts less embedded in the scholarly literature, and teams with lower h-indexes and earlier career stages, consistent with the idea that AI feedback may provide the greatest benefit where access to timely critique is otherwise limited. Together, these findings provide causal evidence that structured AI-based interventions can transform access to scientific feedback from a largely private advantage into a more widely distributed resource, with broader implications for productivity, equity, and capacity across the global research system.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to software engineering (SE), yet their potential for autonomous, role-oriented collaboration remains largely underexplored. Understanding how multiple LLM-based agents coordinate, maintain role alignment, and converge on solutions is critical for SE, as naively allowing agents to interact does not reliably lead to correct or stable outcomes. Recent empirical studies show that unstructured or poorly understood interaction dynamics can result in error propagation, premature consensus on incorrect solutions, or prolonged disagreement that prevents convergence, even when correct partial solutions are present early in the interaction. As an initial step towards addressing this underexplored area, we undertake a systematic analysis of conversations between two agents, a Designer and a Programmer across 12 model combinations from 7 open-source LLMs (Gemma 2, Gemma 3, LLaMA 3.2, LLaMA 3.3, DeepSeek-R1, MiniCPM, and Qwen3). Our systematic approach reveals three key dimensions of multi-agent interaction: efficiency (the speed and stability of convergence), consistency (the degree of role alignment visualized by BLEU and ROUGE), and effectiveness (the extent of compilation success and error resolution). Results show that the DeepSeek-R1:DeepSeek-R1 pair was unique in converging to the correct solution from the very first iteration and sustaining it consistently to the final iteration, while LLaMA 3.2:LLaMA 3.2 and Qwen3:Qwen3 demonstrated strong Designer:Programmer role alignment despite of diverging from the correct solution. The other pairs deviated from the task, never to converge to a result. These findings advance understanding of agentic programming and highlight the need for further research on understanding and calibrating convergence and stop conditions essential for future autonomous SE.

ReAct-style agents for search-intensive, multi-step reasoning tasks rely largely on their own internal judgment to decide what evidence to seek, which reasoning or action step to take next, and when to stop, often producing shallow, redundant, or poorly targeted trajectories. Prior work has explored rubrics as external quality signals, but existing uses are mostly evaluative rather than action-guiding: rubrics typically serve as training-time rewards or post-hoc evaluators of completed outputs, and in deep-research settings they are often coarse-grained and report-level rather than step-level. We introduce Co-ReAct, a rubric-guided action-selection framework that uses rubrics as step-level guidance during inference. At each decision step, Co-ReAct injects a rubric into the agent's context to guide the next Reason-or-Act decision, specifying what the agent should target in evidence seeking, search, reasoning, or self-evaluation. To make this guidance reliable, we train a dedicated rubric generator with GRPO. Unlike prior pairwise or binary preference formulations, our objective optimizes a list-wise Spearman rank-correlation reward against multi-judge expert consensus rankings, encouraging rubrics that are discriminative rather than merely plausible. On DeepResearchBench and SQA-CS-V2, Co-ReAct consistently improves over ReAct and representative test-time compute baselines across search agents built on both 8B/14B open-source and frontier closed-source base models. The trained rubric generator can also serve as a drop-in component that improves these baselines without changing their underlying decision mechanisms. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/ZBWpro/Co-ReAct.

An increasing number of news and research articles report that AI adoption is allowing professionals to blur and extend the boundaries of their corporate roles. With the goal of understanding how work processes might be changing in an AI-forward company, we interviewed 24 product-focused individuals at a large technology firm about how AI has impacted their own work, their work within their product team, and their professional interactions. Our conversations suggest that AI is not only changing formal role responsibilities and collaborations between those roles, but also changing informal cultural practices like professional mentoring that are key to helping professionals settle in their positions, stay engaged with their work, and grow their careers. Some of these changes are positive, such as smoother collaboration between peers, but other changes are more nuanced and put the typical career growth opportunities, like receiving feedback from professional networks and promoting leadership and mentorship, at risk. We propose steps that AI companies can take to make the invisible work more visible. Additionally, we propose efforts that individuals and leaders can take to support their colleagues through AI transformation while preserving healthy company cultures that support diverse thinking, collaboration, and informal interactions.

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly shape how users form, refine, and extend their goals, attributing contributions in human-AI collaboration becomes critical for users calibrating their own reliance and for evaluators assessing AI-assisted work. Yet existing methods focus on final artifacts, missing the process through which goals themselves are jointly shaped. We introduce a goal-level attribution framework, CoTrace, that decomposes explicit goals into verifiable requirements and traces both direct contributions and indirect influences across dialogue turns. Applying CoTrace to 638 real-world collaboration logs, we find that while models account for only 11-26% of goal-shaping contribution, they contribute substantially more on introducing lower-level concrete requirements, and make various kinds of indirect contributions. Through controlled simulations, we show that interaction design choices significantly affect model goal-shaping behavior. In a user study, exposing participants to goal-level analyses shifts their perceived contributions by nearly 2 points on a 5-point scale, revealing systematic miscalibration in how users understand their own AI-assisted work.

Training-free zero-shot composed image retrieval models are recently gaining increasing research interest due to their generalizability and flexibility in unseen multimodal retrieval. Recent LLM-based advances focus on generating the expected target caption by exploring the compositional ability behind the LLMs. Although efficient, we find that 1) the generated captions tend to introduce unexpected features from the reference image due to the semantic gap between the input image and text modification, where the image contains much more details than the text; 2) the point-to-point alignment during the retrieval stage fails to capture diverse compositions. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel Semantic Transition and Transportation in collaboration framework for training-free zero-shot CIR tasks. Specifically, given the composed caption inferred by an LLM, we aim to refine it through a transition vector in the embedding space and make it closer to the target image. Combining LLMs with user instruction, the refined caption concentrates more on the core modification intent and thus filters out unnecessary noise. Moreover, to explore diverse alignment during the retrieval stage, we model the caption and image as discrete distributions and reformulate the retrieval task as a set-to-set alignment task. Finally, a bidirectional transportation distance is developed to consider fine-grained alignments across modalities and calculate the retrieval score. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method can be general, effective, and beneficial for many CIR tasks.

The rapid adoption of Generative AI, including LLM-based chatbots like ChatGPT, has highlighted the need for accessible ways to support public understanding and AI literacy. To address this need, we introduce a game-based, interactive approach in the form of a jigsaw puzzle whose completed image is a comic-based infographic illustrating the workings, capabilities, limitations, and societal implications of these technologies. Each comic sketch also functions as a standalone informational card, providing focused explanations of specific facets of AI use, design, and impact. The visual content was created in a live collaborative session with a professional illustrator and a multidisciplinary group of experts and non experts, combining structured knowledge with informal, exploratory reflections shared during the discussion. By integrating hands-on assembly, visual storytelling, and collaborative interaction, the puzzle provides an engaging and playful tool for exploring the mechanisms, perks, and perils of AI systems in informal learning contexts.

Automating scientific discovery requires more than generating papers from ideas. Real research is iterative: hypotheses are challenged from multiple perspectives, experiments fail and inform the next attempt, and lessons accumulate across cycles. Existing autonomous research systems often model this process as a linear pipeline: they rely on single-agent reasoning, stop when execution fails, and do not carry experience across runs. We present AutoResearchClaw, a multi-agent autonomous research pipeline built on five mechanisms: structured multi-agent debate for hypothesis generation and result analysis, a self-healing executor with a \textsc{Pivot}/\textsc{Refine} decision loop that transforms failures into information, verifiable result reporting that prevents fabricated numbers and hallucinated citations, human-in-the-loop collaboration with seven intervention modes spanning full autonomy to step-by-step oversight, and cross-run evolution that converts past mistakes into future safeguards. On ARC-Bench, a 25-topic experiment-stage benchmark, AutoResearchClaw outperforms AI Scientist v2 by 54.7%. A human-in-the-loop ablation across seven intervention modes reveals that precise, targeted collaboration at high-leverage decision points consistently outperforms both full autonomy and exhaustive step-by-step oversight. We position AutoResearchClaw as a research amplifier that augments rather than replaces human scientific judgment. Code is available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw.

Existing affective-computing, social-signal-processing, and meeting corpora capture important parts of human interaction, but they rarely support analysis of affect in co-located groups as a coupled individual, interpersonal, and group-level process. The required signals (per-participant physiology, eye movement, audio, self-report, task outcomes, and personality) are usually fragmented across separate dataset traditions. We introduce GroupAffect-4, a multimodal corpus of 40 participants in 10 four-person groups, each completing four ecologically varied collaborative tasks spanning information pooling, negotiation, idea generation, and a public-goods game. Each participant is instrumented with a wrist-worn physiology sensor, eye-tracking glasses, and a close-talk microphone; sessions include continuous affect self-reports, post-task questionnaires, task outcomes, and Big-Five personality scores, all time-aligned to a shared clock. The dataset covers over 91% of expected physiology windows and 98% of eye-tracking windows, with strong task validity confirmed by a clear affective manipulation check across the negotiation block. We define fifteen benchmarkable targets spanning three analysis levels -- within-person state, between-person traits, and group dynamics -- and report leave-one-group-out feasibility baselines establishing the dataset's evaluative scope. GroupAffect-4 is released with a BIDS-inspired structure, Croissant metadata, a datasheet, per-session quality reports, and open processing scripts. Code and processing scripts are available at https://github.com/meisamjam/GroupAffect-4; the dataset is publicly archived at https://zenodo.org/records/20037847.

Split Federated Learning (SFL) enables privacy-preserving collaborative training by partitioning models between clients and a server. However, under non-IID data distributions, SFL often suffers from biased optimization and unstable convergence, while existing solutions largely adapt techniques from conventional federated learning. In this work, we observe that the split architecture of SFL inherently alters how client information is represented and coordinated, opening opportunities for bias compensation beyond parameter-level aggregation. Based on this insight, we propose BESplit, an architecture-aware framework that exploits the intrinsic structure of SFL to mitigate non-IID effects. First, to prevent biased local data from dominating global updates, we introduce Evidential Aggregation (EA) to perform fine-grained reweighting of client contributions based on evidential uncertainty. Second, to further reduce distributional skew, we develop Bias-Compensated Collaboration (BCC) to align split-layer representations by pairing complementary clients. Finally, Dual-Teacher Distillation (DTD) is incorporated to synchronize knowledge between decoupled client and server models, enabling independent local inference. Extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets demonstrate that BESplit consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in accuracy, convergence stability, and computational efficiency under diverse non-IID settings.

Personal AI stacks, like OpenClaw and Hermes Agent, are becoming central to daily work, yet they route nearly every query (often over sensitive local data) to cloud-hosted frontier models. Replacing frontier models with local models inside existing stacks does not work: swapping Claude Opus 4.6 for Qwen3.5-9B drops accuracy by 25-39 pp across personal AI tasks like PinchBench and GAIA. Existing stacks bundle agentic prompts, tool descriptions, memory configuration, and runtime settings around a specific cloud model. Only the prompts can be tuned, and state-of-the-art prompt optimizers close just 5 pp of the local-cloud gap on their own. This motivates a decomposed personal AI stack: one that exposes individual primitives which can be optimized individually or jointly to close the local-cloud gap. We present OpenJarvis, an architecture that represents a personal AI system as a typed spec over five primitives: Intelligence, Engine, Agents, Tools & Memory, and Learning. Each primitive is an independently editable field, making the stack end-to-end optimizable and measurable against accuracy, cost, and latency. Towards closing the local-cloud gap without surrendering local-model properties, OpenJarvis introduces LLM-guided spec search, a local-cloud collaboration in which frontier cloud models propose edits across the spec at search time, only non-regressing edits are accepted, and the resulting spec runs entirely on-device at inference time. With LLM-guided spec search, on-device specs match or exceed cloud accuracy on 4 of 8 benchmarks and land within 3.2 pp of the best cloud baseline on average. They also reduce marginal API cost by ~800x and end-to-end latency by 4x.

Collaborative game-based learning environments offer rich opportunities for small-group knowledge construction, yet automatically predicting student collaboration satisfaction remains challenging. A critical barrier is modality degradation: in educational deployments, individual modalities such as eye gaze exhibit inconsistent informativeness across student cohorts, causing implicit attention-based fusion to produce brittle multimodal representations. We propose the Affinity-Aligned Multimodal Learning Analytics (AAMLA) framework, whose core contribution is the Cross-modal Affinity-guided Modality Alignment (CAMA) module, which explicitly models inter-modal relationships via affinity matrices and enforces cross-modal consistency through contrastive learning, enabling adaptive suppression of uninformative modalities without discarding them. AAMLA further applies modality-specific projection layers to map heterogeneous features, including facial action units, head pose, eye gaze, and interaction trace logs, into a unified semantic space prior to alignment. Experiments on 50 middle school students in the EcoJourneys collaborative learning environment demonstrate consistent improvements over unimodal baselines and prior cross-attention approaches under standard and modality degradation conditions, with SHAP and t-SNE analyses confirming that CAMA produces robust, interpretable cross-modal representations for student collaboration modeling.

LLM-based autonomous agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in reasoning, planning, and tool use, yet remain limited when tasks require sustained coordination across roles, tools, and environments. Multi-agent systems address this through structured collaboration among specialized agents, but tighter coordination also amplifies a less explored risk: errors can propagate across agents and interaction rounds, producing failures that are difficult to diagnose and rarely translate into structural self-improvement. Existing surveys cover individual agent capabilities, multi-agent collaboration, or agent self-evolution separately, leaving the causal dependencies among them unexamined. This survey provides a unified review organized around four causally linked stages, which we term the LIFE progression: Lay the capability foundation, Integrate agents through collaboration, Find faults through attribution, and Evolve through autonomous self-improvement. For each stage, we provide systematic taxonomies and formally characterize the dependencies between adjacent stages, revealing how each stage both depends on and constrains the next. Beyond synthesizing existing work, we identify open challenges at stage boundaries and propose a cross-stage research agenda for closed-loop multi-agent systems capable of continuously diagnosing failures, reorganizing structures, and refining agent behaviors, extending current coordination frameworks toward more self-organizing forms of collective intelligence. By bridging these previously fragmented research threads, this survey aims to offer both a systematic reference and a conceptual roadmap toward autonomous, self-improving multi-agent intelligence.

This study focuses on weakly-supervised Video Moment Retrieval (VMR), aiming to identify a moment semantically similar to the given query within an untrimmed video using only video-level correspondences, without relying on temporal annotations during training. Previous methods either aggregate predictions for all instances in the video, or indirectly address the task by proposing reconstructions for the query. However, these methods often produce low-quality temporal proposals, struggle with distinguishing misaligned moments in the same video, or lack stability due to a reliance on a single auxiliary task. To address these limitations, we present a novel weakly-supervised method called Multi-proposal Collaboration and Multi-task Training (MCMT). Initially, we generate multiple proposals and derive corresponding learnable Gaussian masks from them. These masks are then combined to create a high-quality positive sample mask, highlighting video clips most relevant to the query. Concurrently, we classify other clips in the same video as the easy negative sample and the entire video as the hard negative sample. During training, we introduce forward and inverse masked query reconstruction tasks to impose more substantial constraints on the network, promoting more robust and stable retrieval performance. Extensive experiments on two standard benchmarks affirm the effectiveness of the proposed method in VMR.

Despite the popularity of the actor-critic method and the practical needs of collaborative policy training, existing works typically either overlook environmental heterogeneity or give up personalization altogether by training a single shared policy across all agents. We consider a federated actor-critic framework in which agents share a common linear subspace representation while maintaining personalized local policy components, and agents iteratively estimate the common subspace, local critic heads, and local policies (i.e., actors). Under canonical single-timescale updates with Markovian sampling, we establish finite-time convergence via a novel joint linear approximation framework. Specifically, we show that the critic error converges to zero at the rate of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/((1-γ)^4\sqrt{TK}))$, and the policy gradient norm converges to zero at the rate of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/((1-γ)^6\sqrt{TK}))$, where $T$ is the number of rounds, $K$ is the number of agents, and $γ\in (0,1)$ is the discount factor. These results demonstrate linear speedup with respect to the number of agents $K$, despite heterogeneous Markovian trajectories under distinct transition kernels and coupled learning dynamics. To address these challenges, we develop a new perturbation analysis for the projected subspace updates and QR decomposition steps, together with conditional mixing arguments for heterogeneous Markovian noise. Furthermore, to handle the additional complications induced by policy updates and temporal dependence, we establish fine-grained characterizations of the discrepancies between function evaluations under Markovian sampling and under temporally frozen policies. Experiments instantiate the framework within PPO on federated \texttt{Hopper-v5} action-map heterogeneity, showing gains over Single PPO and FedAvg PPO and downstream transfer from the learned shared trunk.

Learned image compression (LIC) increasingly requires reconstructions that balance distortion fidelity and perceptual realism across a wide range of bitrates. However, most existing methods still rely on a single compressed latent representation to simultaneously carry structural details, semantic cues, and perceptual priors, requiring the same latent representation to serve multiple, potentially conflicting roles. This tension becomes evident across different latent paradigms: scalar-quantized (SQ) continuous latents provide rate-scalable fidelity but tend to lose perceptual details at low rates, while vector-quantized (VQ) discrete tokens preserve compact semantic cues but suffer from limited structural fidelity and bitrate scalability. To address this issue, we propose Mixture of Decoder Experts (MoDE), a dual-latent collaborative decoding framework that decomposes reconstruction responsibilities across complementary latent paradigms. Specifically, MoDE treats the SQ branch as a fidelity-oriented expert and the VQ branch as a perception-oriented expert, and coordinates them through two decoder-side modules: Expert-Specific Enhancement (ESE), which preserves branch-specific expert references, and Cross-Expert Modulation (CEM), which enables selective complementary transfer during reconstruction. The resulting framework supports selective cross-latent collaboration under a shared dual-stream bitstream and enables both fidelity-anchored and perception-anchored decoding. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MoDE achieves a more favorable fidelity-perception balance than representative distortion-oriented, perception-oriented, generative, and dual-latent baselines across a wide bitrate range, highlighting decoder-side expert collaboration as an effective design for wide-range fidelity-perception balanced LIC.

This work compares three interaction modalities for human-robot collaboration: passive, reactive, and proactive. We studied 18 participants assembling a seven-layer colored tower from memory while using nearby and distant blocks. In the passive modality participants worked alone; in the reactive modality a mobile robot helped only upon request; in the proactive modality it initiated brick delivery and error signaling without explicit requests. Although robot assistance increased completion time, most participants preferred collaboration: 67% preferred proactive behavior and 78% judged it most useful. These results suggest that timely proactive support can improve user experience in controlled collaborative tasks.

Multi-agent systems provide a powerful way to extend large language models (LLMs) by decomposing a complex task into specialized subtasks handled by different agents. However, their performance is often hindered by error propagation, arising from suboptimal workflow design or inaccurate agent outputs, which can propagate through the agent collaboration process and degrade final results. To address the challenges, we present MANGO (Multi-Agent Network Gradient Optimization), a data-driven framework that organizes and refines agent collaboration via a flow network constructed from past successful workflows. MANGO integrates reinforcement learning and textual gradients to jointly optimize workflow paths and agent behaviors, while a skipping mechanism prevents redundant updates to well-optimized agents for improving efficiency. Extensive experiments on seven benchmarks show that MANGO achieves up to 12.8% performance improvement over state-of-the-art baselines, enhances efficiency by 47.4%, and generalizes effectively to unseen domains. Our code and datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/openJiuwen-ai/agent-store/tree/main/community/mango.

In this paper, we present AgentDisCo, a novel Disentangled and Collaborative agentic architecture that formulates deep research as an adversarial optimization problem between information exploration and exploitation. Unlike existing approaches that conflate these two processes into a single module, AgentDisCo employs a critic agent to evaluate generated outlines and refine search queries, and a generator agent to retrieve updated results and revise outlines accordingly. The iteratively refined outline is then passed to a downstream report writer that synthesizes a comprehensive research report. The overall workflow supports both handcrafted and automatically discovered design strategies via a meta-optimization harness, in which the generator agent is repurposed as a scoring agent to evaluate critic outputs and generate quality signals. Powerful code-generation agents (e.g., Claude-Code, Codex) systematically explore agent configurations and construct a policy bank, a structured repository of reusable design strategies, enabling the framework to self-refine without extensive human intervention. We evaluate AgentDisCo on three established deep research benchmarks (DeepResearchBench, DeepConsult, DeepResearchGym) using Gemini-2.5-Pro, achieving performance comparable to or surpassing leading closed-source systems. Observing that existing benchmarks inadequately reflect real-world user needs, we introduce GALA (General AI Life Assistants), a benchmark that mines latent research interests from users' historical browsing behavior. We further develop a rendering agent that converts research reports into visually rich poster presentations, and demonstrate an end-to-end product, AutoResearch Your Interest, which delivers personalized deep research recommendations derived from individual browsing histories.

Multi-agent systems (MAS) assume that collaborating inherently improves Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning. We challenge this by demonstrating that simulated social pressure triggers an algorithmic Bystander Effect,'' inducing severe cognitive loafing. By evaluating 22,500 deterministic trajectories across 3 dataset contexts (GAIA, SWE-bench, Multi-Challenge) with 3 state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, we semantically audit internal reasoning traces against external outputs. We formalize the \textit{Interaction Depth Limit} ($D_L$), the exact plurality threshold where an agent's logical sovereignty collapses into social compliance. Crucially, we uncover the \textit{Sovereignty Gap}: models frequently compute the correct derivation internally but suffer Alignment Hallucinations'' -- actively subjugating empirical evidence to sycophantically appease a simulated swarm. We prove that multi-agent social load is strictly non-commutative; the "brand" identity of the ``Lead Anchor'' auditor disproportionately dictates the swarm's integrity. These findings expose architectural vulnerabilities, proving that unstructured multi-agent topologies can degrade independent reasoning.

We demonstrate LLARS (LLM Assisted Research System), an open-source platform that bridges the gap between domain experts and developers for building LLM-based systems. It integrates three tightly connected modules into an end-to-end pipeline: Collaborative Prompt Engineering for real-time co-authoring with version control and instant LLM testing, Batch Generation for configurable output production across user-selected prompts $\times$ models $\times$ data with cost control, and Hybrid Evaluation where human and LLM evaluators jointly assess outputs through diverse assessment methods, with live agreement metrics and provenance analysis to identify the best model-prompt combination for a given use case. New prompts and models are automatically available for batch generation and completed batches can be turned into evaluation scenarios with a single click. Interviews with six domain experts and three developers in online counselling confirmed that LLARS feels intuitive, saves considerable time by keeping everything in one place and makes interdisciplinary collaboration seamless.

Most path planners assume fully known, static environments, assumptions that fail when robots navigate in dynamic and partially observable environments. SMART-3D addresses these issues by real-time replanning, where it morphs the underlying RRT* tree whenever new obstacles or structures are discovered in the environment. Instead of rebuilding the tree entirely from scratch, SMART-3D prunes invalid nodes and edges and subsequently repairs the disjoint subtrees at hot-nodes to find a new path, thus providing high computational efficiency for real-time adaptability. We extend SMART-3D to perception-enabled collaborative multi-agent navigation (PECMAN) in unknown environments. PECMAN is built upon distributed tree morphing and shared perception strategies, where each agent reacts to environmental changes and morphs its respective tree to replan its path, while simultaneously broadcasting newly discovered structures to other agents, thus enabling them to proactively replan even in areas that have not yet been explored by them. This approach reduces redundant reactions and unnecessary replannings of the agents due to improved situational awareness. The performance of PECMAN was evaluated by 28,000 multi-agent simulations on seven 2D scenarios with different case studies. The results show that PECMAN achieves up to 52% reduction in the team-completion time, while maintaining near 100% success rates. Finally, PECMAN was tested by real experiments on two autonomous robots in a building environment.

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly expected to operate in enterprise environments, where work is distributed across specialized roles, permission-controlled systems, and cross-departmental procedures. However, existing enterprise benchmarks largely evaluate single agents with broad tool access, while existing multi-agent benchmarks rarely capture realistic enterprise constraints such as role specialization, access control, stateful business systems, and policy-based approvals. We introduce \textsc{EntCollabBench}, a benchmark for evaluating enterprise multi-agent collaboration. \textsc{EntCollabBench} simulates a permission-isolated organization with 11 role-specialized agents across six departments and contains two evaluation subsets: a Workflow subset, where agents collaboratively modify enterprise system states, and an Approval subset, where agents make policy-grounded decisions. Evaluation is based on execution traces, database state verification, and deterministic policy adjudication rather than natural-language response judging. Experiments with representative LLM agents show that current models still struggle with end-to-end enterprise collaboration, especially in delegation, context transfer, parameter grounding, workflow closure, and decision commitment. \textsc{EntCollabBench} provides a reproducible testbed for measuring and improving agent systems intended for realistic organizational environments.

Multi-agent systems can be extremely efficient when working concurrently and collaboratively, e.g., for delivery, surveillance, search and rescue. Coordination of such teams often involves two aspects: selecting appropriate subteams for different tasks in various areas, and coordinating agents in the subteams to execute the associated subtasks. Existing work often assumes that the tasks are static and known beforehand, where an integer program can be formulated and solved offline. However, in many applications, the team-wise tasks are generated online continually by external requests, and the amount of subtasks within each task is uncertain, e.g., the number of packages to deliver or victims to rescue. The aforementioned offline solution becomes inadequate as it would require constant re-computation for the whole team and global communication to broadcast the results. Thus, this work tackles the large-scale coordination problem under continual and uncertain temporal tasks, specified as temporal logic formulas over collaborative actions. The proposed hierarchical framework, HULK, consists of two interleaved layers: the rolling assignment of currently known tasks to subteams within a certain horizon, and the dynamic coordination within a subteam given the detected subtasks during online execution. Thus, coordination is performed hierarchically at different granularities and triggering conditions, improving computational efficiency and robustness. The method is validated rigorously over large-scale heterogeneous systems under various temporal tasks and environment uncertainties.

The emerging collaborative information-based knowledge tracing (KT) has been a promising way to enhance modeling of learners' knowledge states. The core idea is to extract the collaborative information from interaction sequences of other learners to assist the prediction on the target one. Despite effectiveness, existing methods are built on the raw interaction sequences with tailored modules, which inevitably limits their capacity in deeply capturing learning behavioral patterns and generalization. To this end, we propose a general meta-behavioral pattern-aware framework (MBP-KT) for KT. Specifically, MBP-KT introduces a novel meta-behavioral sequence construction to transform the raw interaction sequences into the combinations of different meta-behavioral patterns. In this way, the learning behavioral patterns of learners can be effectively preserved. Then, MBP-KT develops a parameter-free module to extract the global collaborative representations from the constructed meta-behavioral sequences. Moreover, MBP-KT provides general injection strategies to introduce the extracted global collaborative information into various downstream KT models, ensuring the universality of the collaborative information. Extensive results on real-world datasets demonstrate that MBP-KT can consistently boosts the performance of a wide range of KT models.

Large language models (LLMs) are transforming society, powering applications from smartphone assistants to autonomous driving. Yet cloud-based LLM services alone cannot serve a growing class of applications, including those operating under intermittent connectivity, sub-second latency budgets, data-residency constraints, or sustained high-volume inference. On-device deployment is in turn constrained by limited computation and memory. No single endpoint can deliver high-quality service across this spectrum. This article focuses on collaborative intelligence, a paradigm in which multiple independent LLMs distributed across device and cloud endpoints collaborate at the task level through natural language or structured messages. Such collaboration strives for superior response quality under heterogeneous resource constraints spanning computation, memory, communication, and cost across network tiers. We present collaborative inference along two complementary and composable dimensions: vertical device-cloud collaboration and horizontal multi-agent collaboration, which can be combined into hybrid topologies in practice. We then examine learning to collaborate, addressing the training of routing policies and the development of cooperative capabilities among LLMs. Finally, we identify open research challenges including scaling under resource heterogeneity and trustworthy collaborative intelligence.

Computational models of collaboration without prior coordination often overlook how heterogeneous agent traits and complex task structures jointly produce systemic bottlenecks, inefficiencies, and contribution inequalities. We address this by using an agent-based model of ad-hoc teamwork in a kitchen environment. Our model integrates diverse agent personas with tasks that combine serial and parallel dependencies. We identify a specialist's dilemma, where rigid role assertion generates system-level bottlenecks, amplifies workload inequality, and fosters fragmented, homophilous networks. We also find that team size and communication overhead interact with problem structure to generate diminishing returns and redundant collaboration. Linking micro-level behavior to macro-level outcomes provides insights into emergent collaboration and design principles for effective multi-agent teamwork.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for next-generation recommender systems, offering strong semantic understanding and natural-language reasoning abilities. Despite recent progress, current LLM-based recommenders still face key challenges in constructing decision-relevant contexts from heterogeneous evidence. First, existing methods often rely on fixed context construction strategies: collaborative behavioral evidence and item-side metadata are typically incorporated through predefined prompts, static retrieval pipelines, or handcrafted injection mechanisms, making it difficult to determine what information is truly beneficial for each instance. Second, heterogeneous evidence introduces a severe context-efficiency bottleneck. Rich metadata and collaborative interaction records can quickly overwhelm the context window, while aggressive compression or heuristic filtering may discard fine-grained evidence critical for accurate recommendation. To address these challenges, we propose RRCM, a ranking-driven retrieval-and-reasoning framework over collaborative and metadata memories for LLM-based agentic recommendation. RRCM starts from a lightweight user-history context and learns whether to recommend directly, retrieve collaborative evidence, retrieve item metadata, or interleave both through reasoning. Both memories are represented in natural language and accessed through a unified retrieval interface, enabling flexible evidence acquisition without handcrafted CF injection or fixed retrieval rules. We optimize this memory-reading policy with an outcome-only ranking reward, instantiated using group relative policy optimization, so that retrieval decisions are directly driven by final top-k recommendation quality. Extensive experiments show that RRCM significantly outperforms traditional baselines and diverse LLM-based recommendation approaches.

Large language model (LLM)-based Multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown promise in tackling complex collaborative tasks, where agents are typically orchestrated via role-specific prompts. While the quality of these prompts is pivotal, jointly optimizing them across interacting agents remains a non-trivial challenge, primarily due to the misalignment between local agent objectives and holistic system goals. To address this, we introduce MASPO, a novel framework designed to automatically and iteratively refine prompts across the entire system. A core innovation of MASPO is its joint evaluation mechanism, which assesses prompts not merely by their local validity, but by their capacity to facilitate downstream success for successor agents. This effectively bridges the gap between local interactions and global outcomes without relying on ground-truth labels. Furthermore, MASPO employs a data-driven evolutionary beam search to efficiently navigate the high-dimensional prompt space. Extensive empirical evaluations across 6 diverse tasks demonstrate that MASPO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art prompt optimization methods, achieving an average accuracy improvement of 2.9. We release our code at https://github.com/wangzx1219/MASPO.

Human involvement is critical in training and deploying AI systems in high-stakes defence and security contexts. However, real-time interaction is impractical in HPC environments due to compute intensity and resource constraints. We present a workflow framework that enables asynchronous human-AI collaboration across hybrid infrastructures, including HPC clusters, local machines, and cloud platforms. Workflows can pause at defined checkpoints for human input without halting underlying compute jobs, preventing idle resources and enabling non-blocking supervision. The framework supports interaction with SLURM-based scheduling, containerized and native tasks, and is customized for scenarios requiring human judgment and adaptability. We demonstrate its application in model training on systems like MareNostrum 5, highlighting benefits in portability, efficiency, and oversight in operational AI workflows.

Effective pair programming depends on coordination of attention, cognitive effort, and joint regulation over time, yet most adaptive learning systems remain individual-centric and reactive. This paper introduces ProPACT, a proactive AI-driven adaptive collaborative tutor that treats collaboration itself as the object of instruction. ProPACT constructs a multimodal dyadic learner model based on Joint Visual Attention (JVA), Joint Mental Effort (JME), and individual mental effort, and employs an XGBoost-based forecasting model to predict emerging suboptimal collaboration states up to 30 seconds in advance. These predictions drive a hierarchical adaptive policy that delivers minimally intrusive scaffolds while fading support during productive collaboration. A within-subject study with 26 pair-programming dyads shows that proactive feedback significantly improves debugging success, task efficiency, feedback uptake, and post-intervention gains in JVA and JME, demonstrating the potential of forecast-driven dyadic adaptivity for real-time collaborative learning regulation.