Collaboration

Joint learning across heterogeneous tasks is often treated as task coupling through feature sharing, distillation, or auxiliary supervision. However, in cross-task learning, mismatched representational and supervisory granularities make such coupling prone to interference, teacher bias, or unidirectional collapse. We argue that cross-granularity learning is fundamentally a problem of hierarchical interaction regulation rather than simple task coupling. This issue is particularly evident in UAV perception, where visual shifts and detection--segmentation objectives naturally form coarse- and fine-grained knowledge sources. To systematically study this problem, we introduce CrossUAV, a UAV benchmark for joint object detection and instance segmentation that provides a unified evaluation platform for cross-granularity task collaboration. To address these challenges, we propose Cross-Granularity Socialized Collaboration (CGSC), a progressive and adaptive framework that regulates when, where, and how tasks exchange information across network hierarchies. CGSC progressively activates cross-task interactions and adaptively adjusts the strength according to task contribution, suppressing harmful interference while exploiting complementary coarse- and fine-grained structures. Extensive experiments demonstrate consistent improvements on both tasks, validating hierarchical dynamic interaction as an effective mechanism for cross-granularity collaboration.

Music and dance are social practices of expression and connection, yet most HCI work in human-AI co-creation centers the solo performer. As generative music matures, we ask not only what AI can compose but what social encounters it can organize around sound. We present Encypher, a collaborative generative music system that translates collective movement qualities into text prompts conditioning real-time music generation for dance cyphers. Through five weeks of co-design with local dancers, a user study with unacquainted participants, a public museum event, and a live performance, we found that users developed shared agency, perceiving the music as a response to the room's energy. While newcomers felt uncertain, the system fostered social presence by prompting them to look to each other for cues. By treating sociality as a design concern rather than a downstream effect, we offer a framework and design implications for AI systems for collaborative, embodied expression.

Scientific agents contribute to hypothesis discovery by synthesizing evidence, assessing proposals, and developing new explanations. Recent systems combine scientific agents with evolutionary search through critique, comparison, and revision. However, how different forms of agent collaboration affect hypothesis quality remains an open question. Answering this question requires separating the effects of agents' scientific capabilities from those of their collaboration. A framework must therefore preserve agents' scientific roles and support rules for combining, revising, and retaining hypotheses. Building on this view, we introduce HypoEvolve, which makes collaboration explicit through successive updates to a hypothesis population. Specifically, we propose a generational genetic algorithm to coordinate specialized large language model (LLM) agents that integrate mechanistic arguments, reconsider assumptions, and assess evidence and testability. Each generation specifies how scientific judgments and new proposals reshape the population, making collaboration effects on hypothesis quality directly testable. Moreover, we design our evaluation around scientifically meaningful hypotheses that explain how a proposed intervention could work. Drug repurposing links these explanations to target-level biological claims assessed against external evidence. Specifically, we adapt DepMap and Open Targets into complementary external measures grounded in experimental, genetic, and clinical evidence. Across 34 cancer types, HypoEvolve achieves the highest scores against six baselines on both measures. DepMap selectivity reaches 0.171, versus 0.115 for the strongest baseline. Gains over single-pass generation also generalize to held-out cancer types. HypoEvolve advances a vision of autonomous science in which AI research teams achieve a capacity for discovery beyond that of individual models.

Automatic Related Work Generation (RWG) significantly reduces the human time and effort required to author the Related Work Section (RWS) of a research paper. However, prior methods leveraging multi-agent Large Language Models (LLMs) typically rely on a predefined workflow, where each agent is responsible for a specific step in the entire process. This rigid, static inter-agent coordination limits the adaptive collaboration required to synthesize complex scientific literature. To address this limitation, we propose CREW (Collaborative Reinforcement Learning for Related Work Generation), a novel framework where LLM agents bypass heuristic pipelines to dynamically coordinate by autonomously selecting actions, such as Retrieve, Disseminate, Compose, and Critique, driven by a policy optimized via Independent Proximal Policy Optimization (IPPO). Extensive experiments on a standard RWG benchmark demonstrate that our approach yields substantial quality improvements over strong existing baselines, while significantly reducing token costs. Code is available at https://github.com/YenPBao/CREW-Collaborative-MARL.git

A compact controller can coordinate stronger experts by selecting whom to consult, formulating requests, and integrating their responses. We study whether learning from both the controller's decisions and the experts' reasoning and code improves its generation after expert removal. We introduce \textsc{Rivet} for \emph{collaboration internalization}: expert-augmented reinforcement learning applies a shared outcome signal to controller decisions and returned expert spans, and verified trajectory internalization consolidates complete successful interactions through format-aware supervised training. The deployed controller generates reasoning, code, and interaction structure with local Python execution and no external LLM. Across seven competition-mathematics benchmarks, RIVET-1.7B and RIVET-4B achieve average accuracies of $28.25\%$ and $44.16\%$; Stage~II improves RIVET-4B's accuracy after expert removal by $6.49$ points, and GPQA-Diamond results provide evidence of generalization to scientific reasoning. Ablations show gains from ordinary trajectory supervision and additional format weighting, supporting the effectiveness of training on the content and structure of verified collaborations.

We aim to characterise the value of artificial intelligence in the workplace. Current studies largely measure this value in terms of the current automation capabilities and public adoption of AI. However, such metrics ignore the greater impacts of human--agent collaboration in transforming the nature of work. To account for this, we must expand the scope of our analysis beyond atomised tasks of today, and instead focus on how AI can augment entire workflows of the future. To ground this analysis, we establish a precise definition of AI augmentation comprising six conditions, spanning durable net value, meaningful human control, accountability and recovery, and long-term human development through learning, career pathways, and job purpose. We elaborate on these conditions and apply the framework in a case study of AI-mediated social surveys. We conclude by outlining how organisations, researchers, and government leaders can use this framework to make sense of the future of work.

Autonomous tugboating is central for automating maritime operations such as port logistics and vessel maneuvering, where multiple tugboats must cooperatively transport/manipulate a larger vessel. Collaborative pushing in this setting is challenging due to coupled hydrodynamics, low resistance, strong environmental disturbances, underactuated barge dynamics, and contact-rich interactions. Conventional control methods often rely on simplified models and fixed configurations, which limit their adaptability, while learning-based approaches are constrained by the lack of scalable and physically realistic training environments. We address these challenges by introducing a physics-based, GPU-accelerated simulation and learning framework for collaborative tugboat manipulation. Our simulator incorporates a customized buoyancy model, wave modeling, and hydrodynamic resistance, and supports large-scale multi-agent training under marine dynamics. In this simulator, we train a decentralized MAPPO (Multi-Agent PPO) policy augmented with a structured control prior (SCP) to improve training stability and maintain feasible pushing configurations. We evaluate our learned policy on straight-line transit, turning, and deceleration tasks, where we show that our decentralized framework yields more reliable and accurate maneuvering performance compared to a PID-based controller and a centralized PPO baseline. We further demonstrate zero-shot generalization to more challenging sea states and advanced maneuvers, as well as zero-shot scalability to larger teams of three and four tugboats despite training with only two agents.

Collaborative perception enhances environment understanding through multi-agent information sharing, but its performance in real-world scenarios is constrained by heterogeneous sensor modalities and model architectures. Recent protocol-based two-stage methods alleviate this problem by mapping heterogeneous features into a shared protocol space; however, independently trained modality-specific converters often generate modality-specific pseudo-protocol distributions, leading to semantic inconsistency and error accumulation, which is particularly pronounced in scenarios with large modality discrepancies. To address this issue, we propose CauseCollab, a causal unified and modality-agnostic network. CauseCollab formulates representation learning in the protocol space from a causal perspective, explicitly disentangling semantic factors from modality-specific statistical confounders via causal metric learning. Meanwhile, CauseCollab adopts context-guided Unified Converter for heterogeneous modalities to ensure cross-modal semantic consistency. In addition, integrating new modalities only requires training adapters with minimal parameters. Extensive experiments on the OPV2V and DAIR-V2X datasets demonstrate that CauseCollab achieves state-of-the-art performance, with more significant gains in scenarios involving large modality gaps.

Highly varying production sets increasing challenges for robotic manufacturing and indoor logistics. New capabilities for agility, flexibility, and robustness are needed. Robot skills, integrating motions, tool operations, and sensor perceptions consistently provide an execution mechanism for a versatile set of tasks with varying parameters. In this paper, easy-to-use CAD-model based programming and execution system for parametrized skills and skill monitors is showcased. The execution control structure is dynamic and parametrized, based on a modified Behavior Tree, where only event based communication is used. A human-robot-crane collaborative skill is shown as a test example, where a human instructs an overhead crane and a manipulator in inserting a heavy object supported by the crane, and guided by the manipulator, into the goal.

LLMs are increasingly deployed as orchestrators that coordinate specialized subagents to solve complex tasks through natural language. However, in many important domains like game playing and robotics, the strongest available agents are not language models. Integrating non-language agents with LLMs would require \emph{verbalization}: compressing their rich continuous representations into sparse textual summaries at each interaction step. To study whether verbalization constitutes a bottleneck, we introduce \textsc{LLAMIA-Bench}, a suite of six diverse collaborative chess tasks spanning three facets: behavioral imitation, state assessment, and natural-language explanation. Each task instantiates a well-established chess problem that neither the LLM nor the chess engine can solve alone. To solve LLM collaboration with non-language agents, we introduce \emph{latent state internalization}, which projects the subagent's continuous representations directly into the LLM's token stream as learned state tokens, with dynamic re-encoding as actions advance the environment state. Comparing internalization to verbalized integration, our experiments reveal a consistent \emph{verbalization debt}: the performance gap widens throughout training and persists as the LLM scales from 4B to 14B parameters. A single 14B model, \textsc{LLAMIA}, trained with latent state internalization, matches or exceeds task specialists and frontier models including GPT-5.1 with tool access across all benchmark tasks, and generalizes out-of-distribution where task-specific finetunes collapse

Better probability scores do not establish that evidence has been counted correctly. Repeated inference over one observation can improve predictions without adding an evidential origin. Source-local numerical attributes alone cannot in general distinguish repeated derivations from separately countable acquisitions. PACT (Provenance-Aware evidence Conservation and Typed action admission) separates evidence magnitude from countability through a supplied provenance partition. Under singleton fidelity and insertion non-amplification, the coordinatewise meet is the unique pointwise greatest admissible within-component rule. Component budgets add under stated commensurability and separate-component additivity assumptions. Matched reassignments hold numerical outputs fixed while varying the counting relation. In four of 12 replicated-source tests on HandWritten, false refinement lowers macro-averaged negative log-likelihood and Brier score while increasing normalized common-support area under the risk-coverage curve (ncsAURC). In the controlled handover benchmark, removing the constructed adversarial-consensus condition leaves a 0.056 reduction in ncsAURC for provenance-partition aggregation relative to singleton aggregation under the same score functional. The corroboration contrast disappears, and method ranking remains selection-score dependent. In offline, reference-based human-robot collaboration with four prompts per camera and all other admission inputs fixed, duplicating each prompt output within its camera from multiplicity one to eight leaves all 720 PACT typed responses per checkpoint unchanged. Probability quality and evidence countability require separate evaluation.

LLMs can imitate how people write, which raises concerns about impersonation, trust, and detection in social settings. These concerns are especially important for adolescents, who use generative AI frequently but may struggle to recognize it. We introduce \textit{DoppelBot}, a cooperative social deduction game designed to study how young people detect and respond to AI impersonation. Through studies with middle schoolers, we investigate whether a DoppelBot prompts reflection on privacy and impersonation, how repeated exposure affects AI-detection accuracy as agents become more personalized, and which strategies students use to identify AI doppelgängers. We find that students' detection accuracy improves over time, driven by a shift from relying on linguistic cues to leveraging shared social and contextual signals. Students also demonstrated an understanding of AI limitations such as embodiment and reflected on broader issues such as data privacy. To support future research, we release an anonymized dataset of game transcripts and voting behavior.

Proof assistants such as Lean 4 promise the paradigm of formally verified mathematics, but large-scale formalization projects have faced major barriers to entry, including the need for expertise in formal verification (as well as the underlying mathematics) and the significant time required for writing formal proofs. AI coding agents have dramatically reduced these barriers; human users can now use natural language to prompt agents to write complex proofs in Lean. This opens up the intriguing possibility of internet-scale mathematical collaboration involving both humans and AI agents, where correctness is machine-checked. To realize this possibility, we introduce Prove2Me (https://prove2.me), an open collaborative platform for formalizing mathematics. Users launch formalization "missions", to which AI agents contribute formal proofs toward completion. We designed mechanisms and a specialized harness in Prove2Me that enable large-scale collaboration so that agents can build on one another's work and freely reuse existing results. In doing so, Prove2Me aims to turn math formalization into a scalable, crowd-sourced effort open to anyone with an agent.

Collaborative dialogue can end with apparent agreement while participants still differ on goals, assumptions, or execution plans, creating an \textbf{illusion of alignment (IoA)}. A real-user study across 18 meetings confirms that IoA arises routinely in human collaboration. Yet IoA poses a paradox: if participants were aware of such disagreements, they would already be explicit; if not, they cannot articulate them when asked, leaving IoA invisible to both participants and observers. In this work, we make IoA detectable by generating diagnostic multiple-choice questions whose divergent answers across participants provide direct behavioral evidence of hidden disagreement. We construct \textbf{IoA-Suite}, a dataset and evaluation protocol for detecting hidden disagreement, spanning five task types and six domains. We find that even the best model attains only 49.5% F1, with the bottleneck traced to private context that the dialogue does not surface. We then train \textbf{IoA-Prober-8B} based on IoA-Suite, reaching 51.8% F1 on IoA-Suite. Across the aforementioned 18 real meetings, it surfaces 2.89 hidden disagreements per meeting that participants confirm they had not voiced, transferring to live human dialogue. Further, in multi-agent collaboration, pairing IoA-Prober-8B with LLM agents improves downstream task performance on BigCodeBench-Hard and HiddenBench.

Open-source software communities are a form of digital public infrastructure that not only produces code, but also generates public knowledge and interpersonal relationships through visible collaboration. Generative coding agents (CAs) are an advanced tool to improve development efficiency while shifting part of activities from public human interaction to private human-agent loops. We study this shift using an LLM-based multi-agent simulation initialized with real GitHub data from 1,084 active developers and their repository relationships. After a warm-up with historical commits, we branch the same community state into parallel No-CA and CA conditions for 4-week simulations. CA introduction increases planned and completed tasks by 34.0% and 39.0%, respectively, and reduces median completion time from 45 to 20 minutes. However, adoption reaches only 26.0%, and the gains concentrate among developers who are already more active and well connected. CAs also restructure task execution pathways. Direct human-human interaction declines from 32.4% to 11.6%, while CA-involved modes increase to 57.3%, including 40.3% completed through CA-assisted self-loops. Public knowledge generated under CA condition also provides less support for later tasks. On a standardized retrieval benchmark, the CA corpus achieves 22.3% knowledge coverage, far below the 81.1% achieved by the real-human corpus, and requires more retrieval steps with a lower success rate. These results reveal a productivity-public knowledge tension: coding agents increase technical production, but more work shifts to agent-mediated or private loops, leaving public records less useful to future contributors.

Identifying promising scientific ideas remains an important challenge in research practice. Researchers commonly rely on small-group discussions or one-to-one interactions with a single large language model, yet these approaches often expose them to only a limited range of perspectives and directions. We present AgentPanel, a multi-agent forum for human--AI collaboration in scientific exploration. Heterogeneous agents asynchronously discuss scientific questions in a forum-style environment, while researchers can submit questions, browse and organize candidate ideas, engage agents in follow-up interactions, and optionally generate post-hoc summary reports. We evaluate AgentPanel in terms of idea quality, exploration breadth, interaction effectiveness, candidate-selection efficiency, and practical utility. Offline experiments show that AgentPanel outperforms a centralized multi-agent debate baseline. A human study with 20 participants further shows that users value AgentPanel for perspective diversity and exploration support. In experience-based comparisons with commonly used LLM tools, 65% of participants favored AgentPanel for both breadth of research directions and overall suitability for early-stage exploration. The platform is publicly available at https://agentpanel.cc/.

Real-world software development requires coding agents to operate in shared workspaces where users may inspect and modify code during an ongoing task, yet existing repository-level benchmarks typically evaluate agents working alone or restrict user participation to messages. This leads us to ask: how do coding agents understand and respond to code changes in a shared workspace? We introduce SWE-Touch, a framework that stress-tests this setting through validated Counter-Edits: plausible edits to task-relevant code that conflict with task completion. SWE-Touch mines task-critical regions from multiple repair trajectories, uses a separate User Patch Generator to construct the edits, and injects them with contextual user messages when agents reach the relevant code. We evaluate nine coding models on SWE-bench Verified, with additional experiments on longer-horizon tasks from SWE-Bench Pro and DeepSWE. Counter-Edit lowers average resolve rate by 7.7 percentage points on SWE-bench Verified, with degradation also persisting on both longer-horizon benchmarks. Trajectory analysis links these failures to limited awareness of the evolving workspace: agents may retain conflicting code or replace it without sufficiently re-inspecting the repository and validating the revised code with targeted tests. These findings show that strong autonomous performance does not yet ensure the state awareness and adaptive behavior needed for shared-workspace collaboration, and point to detecting workspace changes, reconciling conflicting edits with the task, and verifying the affected behavior as key capabilities for future optimization.

The deployment of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in autonomous driving (AD) systems is constrained by on-board computing power, restricting vehicles to small VLMs (SVLMs) with limited perception and reasoning capabilities. Infrastructure-assisted AD alleviates this resource constraint by enabling collaboration with large VLMs (LVLMs) at edge servers. However, in dynamic vehicular environments, the utility of sensory data for downstream tasks decays rapidly, making timeliness of information a critical concern. To balance the accuracy gains of LVLMs with their latency-induced timeliness degradation, we develop a Timeliness-Aware Large-Small VLM Collaboration (TALSC) framework. Specifically, we first model the Age of Information (AoI) evolution for VLM inference and characterize the coupling among AoI, token length, and task performance to formulate a general timeliness metric. Building on this, we propose the TALSC online scheduling algorithm. Since scheduling decisions have a delayed impact on future timeliness metric and the output token number is unknown at scheduling time, we design a Lyapunov drift-plus-estimated-penalty algorithm and provides a guaranteed performance. In simulation, we first conduct a case study to derive a fitted timeliness metric based on nuScenes dataset, and further show that TALSC outperforms baselines under various communication and computing settings, achieving up to a 12.6% normalized improvement in Micro-F1 score compared with the best-performing baseline.

LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) extend LLM capabilities through iterative communication and shared contexts. However, this collaboration introduces a vulnerability: backdoor behavior can be activated when peer evidence reaches a hidden threshold, rather than being determined by any single message. We introduce a collective evidence-threshold backdoor paradigm for MAS and Boundary-Conditioned Backdoor Injection (BCBI), which constructs counterfactual boundary pairs to separate benign behavior before the threshold from the adversarial objective after it, and learns latent progression aligned with evidence. To mitigate this threat, we propose LAtent Transition Test-time Evaluation (LATTE), a clean-only latent-transition defense that learns benign communication dynamics and quarantines anomalous agent updates before their responses propagate. Across several benchmarks, BCBI yields selective activation with little premature activation; without knowing the attack target or trigger, LATTE limits propagation with minimal disruption.

The discovery of scaling laws has highlighted the extraordinary potential of AI systems with a striking empirical pattern: as AI systems scale, their capabilities tend to improve predictably. Yet, in real-world applications, AI rarely operates in isolation; instead, it often works alongside humans, raising the question of whether these gains persist in human-AI collaboration. In this work, we develop an analytical model to examine when the empirical scaling benefits of AI translate into improved human-AI joint system performance. We demonstrate that the performance of a human-AI system can scale positively as the AI scales up-provided that humans have an accurate perception of the AI's capabilities. Human misperception, however, can fundamentally alter this relationship: i) when humans over-perceive the AI's capabilities, a scaling paradox may arise, in which greater AI scale reduces overall system performance and amplifies firm-level profit losses, and (ii) when humans under-perceive the AI's capabilities, performance still improves with scale but at a substantially slower rate. We further show that firms can actively manage these distortions through operational policies such as cost internalization and perception alignment, whose effectiveness depends on the economics of AI deployment and the direction of human misperception. These findings suggest that organizations may benefit more from managing the human-AI interface than from simply investing in larger, more expensive AI systems. More broadly, our results suggest that AI scaling should be viewed not only as a technological challenge, but also as a behavioral and operational one, and caution against the view that larger AI systems will automatically lead to better operational outcomes. Whether AI scaling creates value ultimately depends on how increased AI capabilities shape human beliefs and collaborative efforts.

Understanding large codebases is a long-horizon task for Large Language Model (LLM) agents: answering a single question can require building and running the software, tracing execution across files, and synthesizing evidence over tens of minutes. On SWE-Atlas QnA, a benchmark of long-horizon questions over production repositories, a single Claude Code agent (Opus 4.6) resolves only 32.3% of tasks. Dividing the work among agents with clean contexts mitigates this limitation. However, the subtasks of code comprehension are interdependent. One agent's findings can rewrite another's task, so agents must coordinate during execution, not only at phase boundaries. Existing multi-agent systems support such exchange only between phases, through staged handoffs or synchronized rounds. Communication and work remain mutually exclusive. A discovery made mid-execution cannot be shared until the next boundary. We present AgentRadio, an asynchronous message-passing layer that equips coding-agent harnesses with three primitives: threads, messages, and waiting for mentions. The last runs as a background task, surfacing teammates' messages without interrupting foreground work, so each agent remains passively aware of its peers and folds new findings into its ongoing task. Under a five-phase protocol of division of labor and negotiation, four agents organized by AgentRadio resolve 62.1% of tasks, 29.8 points above a single agent and above Claude Code with the newer Opus 4.8 (57.2%). Rubric-level analysis shows the gain growing with task difficulty, consistent with mid-course correction as the underlying mechanism. Our code is available at https://github.com/Coral-Protocol/AgentRadio.

Time-to-event modeling provides a systematic framework for estimating time-dependent failure risk, reliability, and remaining useful life (RUL) from longitudinal condition monitoring data. However, applying these models to distributed prognostics remains challenging because sensor trajectories and failure-time records are often stored across organizations or operational sites and cannot be centrally pooled due to privacy or proprietary constraints. Moreover, the classical Cox proportional hazards model relies on a nonseparable partial likelihood involving global risk sets, making direct optimization difficult under standard federated learning protocols. This paper presents a federated longitudinal-survival modeling framework for collaborative system failure prognostics. The proposed framework combines longitudinal sensor representation learning with a client-separable discrete-time hazard objective, enabling multiple clients to collaboratively train a prognostic model without sharing raw sensor measurements or individual failure records. Time-dependent representations extracted from multivariate sensor histories are used to estimate interval-specific failure hazards, reliability curves, and system RUL. Experiments on the four C-MAPSS turbofan engine degradation subsets under simulated decentralized settings demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently improves prognostic performance over isolated local training while maintaining performance comparable to centralized training across heterogeneous operating conditions and failure modes. These results demonstrate the potential of federated longitudinal-survival modeling for collaborative, data-aware condition monitoring and system failure prognostics.

Multi-agent frameworks built on large language models (LLMs) routinely entangle three logically distinct concerns: who is on the team (organization), how members align (coordination), and which algorithm fuses their work (collaboration protocol). IMACS (Intelligent Multi-Agent Collaboration System) separates the three into orthogonal, independently swappable layers. Classic organizational theory (Belbin roles, Mintzberg coordination, RACI accountability) becomes executable, validated configuration, and the framework places six published collaboration algorithms behind a common interface while exposing roles, coordination, and accountability as independently configurable factors. We use this separation to conduct controlled comparisons in which organizational assignments vary while the collaboration protocol is held fixed. It also turns protocol choice into a variable that can be learned: Adaptive Org Routing, a contextual-bandit meta-protocol, selects a protocol per task under an explicit quality-cost tradeoff, outperforms every fixed protocol in a controlled study, and trains online on real benchmark and LLM-judge rewards. The ablations expose a mechanism. Accountability placement changes outcomes exactly when the protocol routes the deliverable through the accountable agent, and the winning placement flips across model families, so organizational design cannot be hard-coded; it must be revalidated, or learned, for each model binding.

Investigating how affective states such as confusion and frustration persist and transition during co-situated collaborative problem solving (CPS) is important for understanding the dynamics of epistemic emotions. However, the accurate identification of affective states remain challenging as there is no gold-standard truth in this space. Here, we analyze affective states collected through retrospective cued-recall during an in-person CPS task. Using ordered network analysis (ONA), we examine (1) the overall ordered structure of affective states and how this structure differs across self-caught and probe-caught reporting methods, and (2) what aspects of this ordered structure are emphasized differently in slower and faster groups. We find that ONA reveals differences in persistence and transition patterns that are not apparent from descriptive summaries alone. In particular, we observe a stable epistemic core linking curiosity, optimism, and confusion, with different reporting methods emphasizing different connections among states. An analysis between faster and slower groups show that roles of confusion and disengagement also shift significantly during collaboration, particularly in their relationship to conflict. We interpret our findings in the context of collaboration and discuss their implications in developing AI systems that support CPS.

Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly and significantly entered scientific workflows, but it remains unclear how their diffusion is associated with changes in scientists' strategies in research directions and team building. We link PubMed Central full text with OpenAlex publication and collaboration histories for 775,323 scientists and analyze CRediT contribution statements from 137,120 multi-author papers. After 2022, scientists increasingly published across more intellectually distant fields and entered fields in which they had not previously worked. These increases in interdisciplinarity and exploration were especially pronounced among established scientists and scientists from non-English-speaking low- and middle-income countries. Authors with stronger AI-writing signals were already more interdisciplinary and exploratory before the widespread adoption of LLMs, and the gap widened further after 2022 compared with authors with weaker AI-writing signals. Scientists' collaboration networks also became more interdisciplinary after 2022. Yet, among authors with stronger AI-writing signals, research interdisciplinarity was less closely tied to the disciplinary diversity of their collaborators. The division of labor within research teams also became more differentiated. Contributors on papers published after 2022 reported narrower role sets on average, coauthors shared fewer roles in common, and their role profiles became less rigid and more fluid. Software and validation roles increased, while conceptual and management roles decreased. These patterns suggest that team members are taking on more distinct responsibilities and may rely less on one another to perform research tasks. Overall, this study indicates that the LLM era coincides with a broader reorganization of scientific exploration, collaboration, and the division of labor.

Counterfactual credit assignment has proven effective in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) for discrete action spaces, yet its extension to continuous-action cooperative tasks remains challenging. Existing methods that approximate the counterfactual baseline via Monte Carlo sampling often introduce bias into policy gradients and fail to guarantee convergence to local optima, as the sampled actions may not have been sufficiently trained. To address these limitations, we propose SAFE, a novel MARL framework that employs a counterfactual baseline conditioned on a self-evolving default action sampled from each agent's experience buffer. This design naturally extends to continuous action spaces without relying on additional simulations, reward models, or environment-specific prior knowledge. The baseline accurately quantifies each agent's contribution, and introduces no bias into the deterministic policy gradient, ensuring convergence to local optima. Extensive experiments on cooperative vehicular tasks demonstrate that SAFE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art models.

Test-time collaboration, including self-consistency, best-of-N selection, critic models, and verifier pipelines, is often credited with broadly improving LLM reasoning, yet its gains are uneven and sometimes negative. We ask when training-free collaboration should be expected to help. For a fixed candidate pool, we decompose a selector or verifier's net gain into measurable factors: recoverable mass, verification-signal coverage, conditional selection quality, and harm to already-correct outputs. This reframes collaboration as a candidate-selection problem rather than as an intrinsic property of a multi-agent topology. Across LiveCodeBench, MATH Level-5 hard subjects, and GPQA-Diamond, gains are bounded first by the oracle gap and then by signal fidelity, which we measure directly as candidate-level agreement between verifier verdicts and official labels. On LiveCodeBench, a public-test verifier (MCC 0.825) gains +8.14 percentage points (pp) over a first-sample baseline; a generated-test verifier (MCC 0.248) improves by +2.70pp and is not statistically distinguishable from an LLM selector, but operates at near-zero harm versus the selector's 4.69% harm rate. On MATH, a symbolic answer-equivalence selector beats self-consistency by +4.67pp, while LLM selectors are negative. On GPQA-Diamond, recoverable mass is only 3.03% and 87.54% of candidate pools are answer-identical; a weaker model's pools shrink both further, suggesting that oracle gap is a joint property of task, model, and sampling configuration. Our framework yields a practical pre-deployment diagnostic: estimate the oracle gap, then measure coverage, signal fidelity, and harm before investing in collaboration.

Measuring conversational states such as cognitive load and conversational power from multimodal behavior requires characteristic features that are not only predictive but also reliable across task contexts. We present a three-dimensional evaluation framework assessing predictive accuracy, cross-task generalizability, and test-retest reliability, applied to interactional, acoustic, and linguistic features extracted from dyadic conversations during collaborative tasks performed over a video-conferencing platform (AVCAffe dataset; 53 dyads, 9 tasks). Our results show that no single feature family dominates all three dimensions. Linguistic features show the highest predictive accuracy for cognitive load but collapse under cross-task evaluation, revealing sensitivity to task-specific vocabulary. Additionally, acoustic reliability, often reported as evidence of feature stability, degrades once speaker identity is controlled, confirming that standard prosodic features measure vocal characteristics rather than conversational state. Interaction features provide the only genuinely reliable signal, unchanged after speaker normalization. Interestingly, classifying power role remained near chance baseline across all conditions, indicating limitations of task-level aggregated behavior for predicting power role in conversation. Our findings reveal three insights: (1) linguistic features predict best but generalize poorly across task contexts; (2) acoustic reliability collapses to near-zero once speaker identity is controlled, challenging standard evaluation practice; and (3) interaction features provide the only genuinely reliable signal, with floor dominance predicting within-dyad cognitive load asymmetry. These results argue for speaker normalization and multi-dimensional evaluation as prerequisites for context-aware, robust multimodal feature selection in conversational systems.

As generative AI is increasingly applied to automate multi-step and high-stake workflows, human judgment and involvement remain essential for ensuring the quality of AI-generated outputs. In practice, while it is desirable for human experts to provide oversight on AI regularly, often by reviewing intermediate outputs, giving feedback, making corrections, and steering subsequent steps, such oversight is constrained by the time and resources that humans can afford. This creates a tension between the need for human oversight and AI's efficiency in delivering more output with less intervention. An important but underexplored question, then, is how to optimally engage humans in human-AI coworking. This work was originally motivated by our empirical observation that in long AI workflows, human oversight often improves user satisfaction while reducing unnecessary rework and token consumption. From there, we formulate the problem of where to place oversight stages in human-AI coworking. Under reasonable assumptions, we then develop the nonuniformity principle, which states that the optimal schedule places oversight stages with non-decreasing gaps along the workflow. We empirically validate this principle in two common AI agent workflows: writing literature reviews and constructing websites.

LLM-based agents excel at writing articles, coding and information retrieval. However, they fail to form strong collaborations within the scientific community due to the bidirectional, dynamic nature of the problem and a high demand of decision interpretability. We proposed COWEAVER, a bidirectional, learnable and explainable algorithm to match scientists and form strong collaborations within a human-agent network. COWEAVER matches candidates and requesters through filling capability gaps and filters candidates through a two-stage ranking step. Finally, the model explores newcomers by maintaining uncertainty-aware capability estimates and updating them through requester's feedback. We show that the selection mechanism of combining both exploration (UCB) and greedy of COWEAVER exceeds the greedy-only mechanism - the analytical best solution - on 6 out of the 20 tasks and performed on par with the greedy-only mechanism in terms of selecting the best candidate. We compared COWEAVER baselines in terms of matching quality and efficiency. COWEAVER outperforms baselines on all metrics.

Automatic symbolic music analysis has made substantial progress, yet existing systems are typically designed for a single mode of use, such as full-score prediction, and therefore do not match the broader range of operations that arise in analysis workflows, including partial completion, local correction, and iterative refinement. As a result, there remains a gap between strong benchmark models and systems that can support interactive analytical use. We present a unified framework for symbolic Roman-numeral (RN) analysis that narrows this gap by combining strong predictive performance with direct support for constrained completion and revision. The method is designed to provide a practical trade-off between accuracy and interactive responsiveness by computing expensive pretrained representations once and reusing them during iterative refinement, making powerful pretrained models more amenable to interactive settings. It supports complete score analysis, targeted revision of existing labels, and inference of missing annotations from partial context through a shared modeling framework. Experiments on Dilemmadata, the largest and most heterogeneous benchmark of its kind, show that the proposed approach is a strong RN-analysis baseline while also supporting masked completion from partial labels. Together with a prototype interface for multi-level candidate inspection and editing, these results position automatic RN analysis not only as a prediction problem, but also as a foundation for future interactive tools for music analysis.

We propose a collaborative meta-learning framework for distributed Bayesian optimization matching centralized performance without raw-data exchange. We show gradient sharing leaks client observations, with leakage worsening as the search converges and queries concentrate near the optimum. We evaluate a differentially private defense and characterize its privacy-utility trade-off.

The transition of autonomous mobile robots from controlled industrial settings to dynamic, human-centric environments, such as manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare, has made their safe and autonomous operation a critical area of research. These sophisticated machines must be capable of perceiving, understanding, and interacting with their surroundings to navigate freely and perform complex tasks. A significant obstacle to achieving this is the lack of comprehensive contextual awareness, which requires a robot to recognize its spatial environment and identify the objects and actors within it. Without this perceptual knowledge, robots struggle to plan adaptive behaviors or engage in meaningful interaction with humans. This thesis presents novel solutions to this challenge by exploring two distinct but complementary research directions. The first direction involves human re-identification and tracking to improve Human-Robot Collaboration. Our developed approach enables a mobile robot to recognize a specific person, facilitating targeted collaboration while ignoring other individuals. The second direction focuses on enhancing the robot's overall perceptual capabilities to understand its environment geometrically and semantically. Geometric information is vital for motion planning and collision avoidance, while semantic knowledge provides the robot with a richer understanding for more advanced interaction. Both solutions are driven by the improvement of the semantical understanding of robots that enhance their knowledge of their surroundings, allowing a smoother and more natural interaction between robots, humans, and the environment. The contributions of this work in human re-identification and environmental understanding represent a significant step toward a future where robots are more contextually aware, enabling safer coexistence and more effective collaboration.

Large language models increasingly serve as teachers generating training data for smaller students. Prior multi-teacher knowledge distillation methods merge outputs without determining which frontier model teaches best, often relying on an LLM judge biased toward its own outputs. We introduce a compete-then-collaborate framework where four frontier AI teachers (Claude, Codex-GPT, Grok, Gemini) are ranked head-to-head by an execution-based judge (unit tests and stdin-stdout checks) with fairness controls, and then collaborate to build a verifiable curriculum for a student (Qwen2.5-Coder). We report three findings. (1) Under execution verification, all teachers solve standard problems near-perfectly after self-correction (99-100%) due to a saturation effect, but harder competition problems separate them (Gemini 77% > Claude 69% = Codex 69% > Grok 50%); however, the robust student-side results do not depend on teacher ranking. (2) Imitation (SFT) on verified solutions does not improve, and can degrade, an already-competent student at 7B and 32B (e.g., from 76.7% to 72.7% on MBPP-test, and 5.9% to 2.9% on competition problems). (3) Using the same collaborative curriculum as a reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) environment improves the student (from 5.9% to 8.8% peak on competition problems, a +49% relative gain), reversing SFT's direction. The value of AI-teacher collaboration lies not in pooling answers to imitate, but in jointly constructing a verifiable environment where the student learns by doing. We release a reproducible on-prem pipeline (NVIDIA GB10) with framework patches for running GRPO on a bleeding-edge stack.

Human-human collaboration is a fundamental aspect of everyday life, essential to success in a wide range of goal-directed activities from household tasks to professional teamwork. While much research has focused on modeling coordination and task execution, the cognitive processes that support such collaboration, particularly Theory of Mind (the ability to infer the mental states of others), remain difficult to study in natural settings. To address this gap, we introduce a novel egocentric and exocentric video dataset capturing real-world collaboration in cooking scenarios. The dataset integrates multi-perspective video, high-quality audio, gaze tracking, and 3D scene and object scans, with annotations for shared attention to objects, social cues and interactions between agents, as well as agent-object interactions. We establish benchmarks for Joint Attention Estimation, Socially Conditioned Object Interaction Anticipation, and Collaborative Handover Prediction, enabling research on multimodal perception, proactive assistance, and collaborative planning. By providing temporally aligned, richly annotated multimodal data, CoMind facilitates the development and evaluation of AI systems capable of modeling complex social interactions and reasoning about human behaviors in collaborative environments. Our dataset and benchmarks are made available at https://comind.ethz.ch/.

Deliberation plays a crucial role in collaboration; when humans work together, they naturally engage in communication to align information and reach an agreement. In this paper, we investigate deliberative large language model (LLM) agents under partially observable joint decision-making tasks. We formalize deliberative collaboration as a cooperative joint decision problem with partial and asymmetric observations, and introduce a scalable benchmark that instantiates this problem across multiple task settings and domains in which agents must exchange information through deliberation to reach a joint decision with a shared reward. We then instantiate a reference scaffold and evaluation protocol for deliberative agents and conduct a systematic evaluation of a range of representative LLMs. The results reveal that complex deliberative collaboration tasks continue to challenge state-of-the-art language models. Even with the aid of external mathematical tools, language models may fail in either the deliberation process for aligning information or the complex reasoning process for making the decision. On the other hand, diagnostic analysis reveals that the deliberation process may also provide opportunities for reflection and error correction, sometimes improving performance over centralized baselines. Altogether, our work establishes a foundation for evaluating and improving LLM agents in deliberative collaboration and provides insights into the strengths, limitations, and properties of current LLM-based multi-agent systems.

Large language models increasingly operate in settings where humans are active collaborators rather than passive task providers. We introduce HAS-Framework, a graph-based framework that represents humans and LLM-powered agents as first-class participants with explicit roles, permissions, communication paths, and action authority. Building on this framework, HAS-Bench evaluates Human-Agent Systems under configurable human participation across agency levels, interaction channels, and persona policies. The benchmark measures both task outcomes and process-level collaboration behavior, including clarification quality, feedback utilization, control calibration, safety, initiative, and interaction cost. Experiments across six domains show that human participation can substantially improve task completion and failure recovery, but the gains depend on when, how, and by whom human input is exercised.

Current vision-language-action (VLA) benchmarks primarily evaluate isolated manipulation skills while leaving human-robot interaction structure largely unmodeled. However, real-world collaboration fundamentally requires coordination under shared agency, including intent understanding, temporal synchronization, protocol adherence, and safe interaction in dynamic environments. To address this gap, we introduce HRIBench, a diagnostic benchmark for intent-aware human-robot collaboration based on executable interaction scenarios. HRIBench represents collaborative tasks as structured scenario scripts that explicitly model agent roles, temporal dependencies, coordination constraints, and human behavior distributions. Building on this abstraction, HRIBench defines three representative interaction roles: Instructor, Collaborator, and Intruder, covering intent communication, joint coordination, and robustness under human intervention. The benchmark contains 13 role-conditioned tasks with over 650 evaluation episodes generated from diverse interaction trajectories and scene variations. Beyond binary task success, HRIBench introduces interpretable interaction-centric metrics spanning synchronization, responsiveness, protocol compliance, and safety. We evaluate adapted policies based on GR00T, pi0.5, and ACT under a unified protocol. Results show that current foundation robot policies struggle substantially in collaborative settings despite strong manipulation ability, revealing major limitations in temporal coordination and intent-aware behavior. Fine-tuning on HRIBench consistently improves collaborative performance. In a real-world adaptation study, simulation data generated by HRIBench improves GR00T N1.5's physical-task success rate from 0.10 to 0.43, demonstrating the benchmark's value for advancing interaction-centric robot learning.

Conversational agents are increasingly embedded in human collaborative work, yet they remain fundamentally passive and reactive: they respond to explicit user requests rather than proactively recognizing moments when a team would benefit from timely intervention as human collaborators often do. This reactive design substantially limits the use of agents as active participants in multi-user collaboration, where disagreements, ambiguous goals, forgotten constraints, underspecified plans, discussion loops, and imbalanced participation can gradually undermine group progress. To move agents from passive assistants toward active participants in multi-user collaboration, we introduce ProACT, a breakdown-aware agent framework grounded in theories of common ground, collaborative planning, and coordination work. ProACT observes the speaker-attributed conversation history, determines whether the current turn contains a collaboration breakdown requiring intervention, decides whether the agent should stay silent or speak, and, when speaking is needed, routes the case to a targeted collaboration skill. We further introduce the first multi-user collaboration benchmark for evaluating proactive agents across project planning, product design, research collaboration, logistics, education, and resource-constrained decision making. Across 3,244 turn-level examples and five LLM backbones, ProACT consistently improves collaborative appropriateness, non-interruptiveness, conciseness, and judged intervention quality over direct chat.

The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse areas of human activity-ranging from everyday tasks to safety-critical applications-aims to enhance decision-making effectiveness with minimal human feedback. Concurrently, it seeks to align decisions with human expectations, preferences, and needs while mitigating risks associated with AI non-determinism. However, humans frequently over- or under-rely on AI recommendations, and current AI systems remain poorly calibrated to human expectations. To address these challenges, we introduce a human-AI collaborative decision-making framework designed to augment human capabilities and align AI agents with human preferences and expectations. Specifically, this paper (a) formulates the collaborative decision-making task as a stochastic game between an AI agent and a human player, and (b) proposes the Human-Centric Reflective Architecture (HCRA), which integrates human-calibrated models with reinforcement learning agents that leverage linguistic feedback in an iterative, reflective process. Evaluation results demonstrate that HCRA enhances decision-making effectiveness and delivers high-quality recommendations.

In this paper, we describe LLMoxie, an institutional AI platform whose three-tiered architecture supports multi-cloud and on-premise inference, a LiteLLM/MLflow control plane for authentication, budgeting, PII masking, and observability, and an application augmentation layer for AI coding agents. Layered on top, an open-source RSE-Plugins ecosystem encodes accumulated RSE knowledge as a Plugin-Agent-Skill hierarchy spanning scientific Python practice, domain-specific knowledge, a six-phase research-and-implement workflow, and project lifecycle management. Scientific software is judged less by raw code quality than by whether it can be cited, audited, reproduced, and extended. Off-the-shelf AI coding agents, optimized against commercial software benchmarks, are poorly calibrated for this setting: they ignore the conventions of the scientific Python libraries they invoke, mishandle sensitive or embargoed data, and leave decision trails that are difficult to reconstruct after the fact. We report on twenty months of practice at a university-based research software engineering (RSE) center, where RSEs embedded across astronomy, earth and climate science, agriculture, and health projects worked to close this gap. We characterize the recurring infrastructure, governance, and process challenges of adopting Agentic AI inside a multi-domain RSE center, describe the platform and plugin design, and distill operational lessons from real scientific software deployments. Together, the platform and plugins shift AI coding agents from generic code generators into domain-aware collaborators that respect community norms and produce auditable provenance of technical reasoning.

Software development is a complex task that demands cooperation among agents with diverse roles. Large language models (LLMs) have enabled autonomous multi-agent software development frameworks that leverage role-based collaboration to automate requirements analysis, coding, testing, and refinement. However, existing approaches typically assume that intermediate agent outputs are equally reliable, leaving them vulnerable to hallucination propagation, where incorrect decisions generated in early development phases are transferred to downstream agents and negatively impact final software quality. To address this challenge, we propose UA-ChatDev, an uncertainty-aware multi-agent software development framework that integrates uncertainty quantification into agent interactions. It introduces a lightweight uncertainty estimation mechanism based on token-level log probabilities to assess the confidence of agent responses and employs phase-aware threshold calibration to selectively trigger retrieval-based verification when uncertainty exceeds acceptable levels. Extensive experiments on the SRDD benchmark demonstrate that UA-ChatDev consistently outperforms existing single-agent and multi-agent software development frameworks across completeness, executability, consistency, and overall quality metrics. Further ablation studies and communication analyses verify that uncertainty-aware interactions enhance code execution reliability.

Collaborative capture of dynamic targets is common in nature as an essential strategy for weaker species against the strong. Similar concepts have shown to be useful for numerous robotic applications, such as security and surveillance, search and rescue. However, most existing works focus on analytical and geometric solutions or end-to-end reinforcement learning methods, which are largely constrained to obstacle-free environments or scenarios with sparse, regularly distributed obstacles. This work tackles the problem from a unique perspective: the renowned strategy of``ambush'' alone would suffice for multiple slower pursuers to capture one faster evader with different levels of intelligence efficiently in complex environments. A parameterized strategy of ambush (including discrete and continuous parameters) is designed first, which takes into account the topological properties of the workspace, the truncated line-of-sight visibility, the relative speed ratio and the limited capture range. Then, a Hybrid Monte Carlo Tree Search (H-MCTS) algorithm is proposed to optimize the associated parameters through long-term planning, enabling the identification of highly promising parameters for future capture. Lastly, the neural acceleration is trained offline to learn the ranking of different choices of parameters across various environments, and to directly predict scores, replacing the rollout process in H-MCTS. The neural acceleration is adopted during online H-MCTS to accelerate the planning procedure while guaranteeing the planning quality. Its efficiency and effectiveness are validated in extensive simulations and hardware experiments, against evaders with different capabilities and intelligence levels, including two-times higher velocity and human-controlled behavior.

Collaborative-perception enables multi-robot systems to enhance situational awareness by sharing perceptual information. Existing collaborative-perception systems face an inherent trade-off between communication bandwidth requirements and perception accuracy, where methods that exchange more information achieve better perception results at the cost of increased communication overhead. However, real-world communication networks impose bandwidth constraints that require minimizing communication overhead without sacrificing perception performance. To address this challenge, we propose HydraCollab, an adaptive collaborative-perception framework that (i) selectively transmits the most informative sensor features and (ii) dynamically employs collaboration strategies (intermediate or late) based on spatial confidence maps. Extensive evaluations on the V2X-R, V2X-Radar and UAV3D-mini datasets demonstrate that HydraCollab achieves the best overall trade-off between accuracy and communication cost among existing collaborative-perception methods. Relative to SOTA Where2comm, HydraCollab uses only 41% of the bandwidth on V2X-R and 26% on V2X-Radar while improving performance by 0.78% and 0.75% respectively. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/AICPS/HydraCollab.

Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have strong potential as embodied agents, but their ability to collaborate in visually grounded environments remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce MECoBench, a multimodal embodied cooperation benchmark with an evaluation platform spanning diverse real-world tasks, two cooperation structures, and three collaboration modes. Through extensive experiments across various MLLMs, we summarize three key findings: (i) Collaboration generally improves embodied task completion, but its benefits depend on balancing collaborative gains against coordination complexity. (ii) Communication is essential to collaboration gains, while the best collaboration mode depends on team size and model capability. (iii) Moreover, collaboration improves robustness under noisy priors and exploration conditions. Generally, MECoBench provides a systematic testbed for understanding the mechanisms and limits of multimodal embodied collaboration. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/q-i-n-g/MECoBench.

Federated Learning often suffers under non-independently and identically distributed data, where a single global model may fail to represent the diversity of client distributions. Clustered Federated Learning mitigates this issue by training specialized models for groups of similar clients, but existing approaches often couple cluster assignment with the main training loop, increasing computational and communication costs. We propose a lightweight clustering approach based on Random Network Distillation. Each client trains a compact Random Network Distillation predictor on its local data and uses its prediction error as a novelty signal to estimate similarity with other clients. This enables the discovery of meaningful client groups before federated training, without sharing raw data or repeatedly evaluating the main model. Crucially, the resulting federations emerge from local novelty estimates at runtime, making the method suitable for autonomous large-scale distributed systems where neither the number of clusters nor the collaboration structure can be specified a priori. Overall, by decoupling clustering from learning, the method provides a task-agnostic and efficient mechanism for autonomous collaboration under non-independently and identically distributed data.

Existing autonomous research agents can support parts of the research process, but most systems still treat research as either an isolated assistant task or a closed workflow. Therefore, autonomous science needs a collaboration infrastructure that coordinates projects, agents, and digital and physical resources. We identify this as a shift from code-centered execution loops to research-oriented collaboration processes, where questions, evidence, participants, and resources must be coordinated under uncertainty. In this framing, an agent may be an AI system, a human researcher, a team, a laboratory, or an organization-backed participant. To this end, we present Clarus, a collaboration infrastructure for coordinating autonomous research agents toward web-scale scientific collaboration. Clarus reformulates research as an open, auditable, attributable, and resource-aware multi-phase collaboration process. It defines a minimal project-agent-resource object model and organizes scientific collaboration through four layers including Research Application, Digital Collaboration, Physical Substrate, and Physical World. Core modules are implemented as pluggable mechanisms, allowing Clarus to adapt to task risk, collaboration structure, and resource constraints. Through a controlled paper-generation case study, we show that Clarus can organize a research goal into a traceable, reviewable, attributable, and accumulative collaboration network across phases, tasks, and participants. Together, the object model, collaboration protocol, trust mechanisms, and prototype validation provide an initial foundation for open research networks. Clarus is now available at clarus.holosai.io.

Multimodal models are increasingly deployed to solve tasks collaboratively with humans or other artificial agents. Existing benchmarks show that these models possess many of the required component capabilities, but the conditions that coincide in collaboration, including time pressure, information asymmetry, and imperfect communication, are usually studied in isolation. We introduce GPTNT, a benchmark built on the cooperative video game Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes, in which two agents must coordinate to defuse procedurally generated bomb puzzles against a live countdown. One agent can see and manipulate the bomb but does not have the defusal instructions; the other has the instructions but cannot see or manipulate the bomb. Neither agent can succeed alone: success requires effective and efficient communication. Unlike turn-based proxies, GPTNT requires agents to act asynchronously and communicate in real time. GPTNT is designed to separate collaboration from reliance on memorized solutions: the instruction manual, the partner, or both can be withheld to isolate what a model derives in the moment from what it already knows. We show that GPTNT poses a substantial challenge for state-of-the-art systems: none of the closed- or open-source models we test defuses a single bomb in real time, a bar that human players clear. Through controlled experiments, we identify critical weaknesses in state tracking, efficient action under time pressure, ambiguity handling, and error recovery. We release GPTNT as a benchmark for collaborative performance that current evaluations leave unmeasured. Because it runs on the real game, GPTNT benefits from procedural generation and inherits a living modding community, allowing the benchmark to evolve as models improve rather than being solved once and retired.

Spatial intelligence is essential for low-altitude unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) perception, collaboration, and navigation. However, existing UAV benchmarks often emphasize image-level recognition, single-view understanding, or narrow answer formats, leaving 3D spatial inference, multi-view collaboration, scene dynamics, and diverse task formulations insufficiently evaluated. To address these gaps, we introduce SpatialUAV, a real low-altitude UAV benchmark comprising 4,331 curated instances across 14 fine-grained task types, covering semantic discrimination, spatial relation, aerial--aerial collaboration, aerial--ground collaboration, and motion understanding. SpatialUAV organizes all samples into a unified visual-input--question--answer schema, while supporting seven input configurations and nine answer formats, including option labels, region identifiers, geometric values, cross-view correspondences, and free-form motion descriptions. To ensure reliable and grounded evaluation, our data construction pipeline integrates detector-assisted regions, depth supervision, metadata-derived rules, extensive manual annotation, blind filtering, and multi-turn human validation, together with task-specific metrics for heterogeneous outputs. Evaluating representative vision-language models across three categories, we show that current models remain far from human-level performance, with pronounced bottlenecks in cross-view association, structured grounding, geometric reasoning, and temporal viewpoint understanding. These results offer empirical guidance for advancing low-altitude UAV spatial intelligence. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Hyu-Zhang/SpatialUAV.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping the nature of work in software development, transforming user roles, workflows, and collaboration patterns across enterprise platforms. This qualitative study investigates how AI alters professional responsibilities within the context of SAP's Business Technology Platform (BTP), combining expert interviews (n=20) and a participatory workshop (n=24). The results reveal substantial shifts in day-to-day tasks and roles in the development domain, characterized by increasing automation of operational tasks, expanding human-AI collaboration, and growing reliance on agentic AI systems. The study further identifies significant implications for existing user-role frameworks, such as the BTP User Type Matrix, which requires adaptation as the workforce is undergoing significant role specific changes. Collectively, these findings highlight a workforce landscape in transition and underscore the need for revised role taxonomies, new governance and oversight functions, and updated design approaches for AI-native enterprise software systems.

Recent advancements have explored agentic zero-shot 3D understanding by reformulating it as video keyframe understanding with Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). However, existing methods face an intrinsic bottleneck due to the finite observation perspectives inherent in videos and the implicit perception of 3D scenes. In this paper, we propose a collaborative multi-agent framework that assigns a Planning Agent to handle high-level viewpoint planning and supplement novel perspectives, and a Perception Agent to explicitly summarize the 3D scene into a structured holistic cognitive map. Specifically, Planning Agent first analyzes this cognitive map to determine query-relevant viewpoints and supplements missing critical perspectives to ensure comprehensive observation. Subsequently, Perception Agent documents object-level attributes from these views by assigning consistent instance identifiers across viewpoints, thereby integrating fragmented observations into the holistic cognitive map. In parallel, it provides feedback to filter out mismatched candidate objects and guide subsequent viewpoint planning. Through this closed-loop iterative process, two agents collaboratively figure out candidates until Perception Agent determines that sufficient information has been captured to complete the task. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on 6 benchmarks, with improvements of 11.1% Acc@0.5 on ScanRefer, 14.6 BLEU-1 on 3D-assisted dialog, and 2.1 EM on SQA3D.

Multi-arm manipulation demands precise spatiotemporal coordination, yet many centralized approaches scale poorly as team size increases. To address this, we propose CLS-DP, a decentralized multi-agent framework that enables implicit coordination under partial observability without shared global views, explicit state information, or inter-agent communication. Under the centralized training and decentralized execution (CTDE) paradigm, CLS-DP distills privileged multi-agent dynamics into a latent space. At deployment, each agent infers a collaborative latent from its local RGB observation and a shared task instruction; it then conditions the diffusion denoising process on this latent. This design enables implicit coordination with a per-agent cost independent of team size. Across six RoboFactory benchmark tasks spanning two to four agents, CLS-DP achieves a 38% mean success rate, outperforming the best centralized baseline (20%) and a decentralized ablation without the collaborative latent (9%). It also maintains superior parameter efficiency across all agent configurations. Attribution maps show that an agent conditioned on the collaborative latent places high attribution on the joints and grippers of both itself and its teammates throughout execution. This suggests that the learned latent efficiently encodes collaborative dynamics from local observation, which facilitates implicit coordination in realistic settings characterized by partial observability.

Medical expert annotators are scarce, and blind reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) can be misleading, motivating approaches in which humans, particularly junior medical trainees or even non-medical personnel, collaborate with AI to achieve robust medical segmentation. Although the Segment Anything Model (SAM) shows promise for general-purpose image segmentation, its performance in human-AI collaboration for specialized medical tasks has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here we present Hi-Seg, a human-in-the-loop segmentation framework for pulmonary nodules built on SAM. Humans iteratively refine prompts through trial-and-error learning and semantic reasoning, progressively guiding SAM toward higher-quality masks. Using chest CT scans from 1,179 patients across 12 centers, we conducted the first large-scale external validation of collaborative human-SAM segmentation. Across all annotator groups, Hi-Seg achieved a mean Dice score of almost 85%, outperforming five state-of-the-art deep learning models by 10-22% and 13 SAM variants by 1-29%. Hi-Seg improved segmentation accuracy while reducing annotation time for medical annotators, and briefly trained non-medical annotators achieved performance comparable to that of the junior medical student. These findings suggest that human-in-the-loop segmentation can reduce clinician workload, enable scalable crowdsourced annotation, and transform clinical workflows by facilitating the safe and efficient integration of foundation models into routine clinical practice.

Controllable text-to-speech (TTS) has become a key research focus. However, methods based on either reference speech or text descriptions lack flexibility and precise control, and recent joint approaches remain loosely coupled, with speech modeling timbre and text controlling global style. We propose FineCombo-TTS, a unified framework for speech synthesis grounded in reference speech and guided by text descriptions, enabling flexible and precise control over acoustic attributes. Instead of explicit attribute disentanglement, we learn a unified acoustic representation and introduce a Conditional Flow Matching (CFM)-based Speech Variance Predictor to model fine-grained reference-to-target transformations guided by text descriptions. To support relative attribute control, we construct FineEdit, a structured paired dataset that explicitly encodes source-to-target attribute variations. Experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves flexible, precise, and expressive controllable TTS.

Air-ground collaborative perception is crucial for robust visual understanding in real-world dynamic environments. However, existing studies typically formulate collaboration as single-task cross-view fusion, overlooking the functional dependencies among localization, target association, and fine-grained parsing. In addition, the heterogeneous nature of aerial and ground views introduces substantial geometric, scale, and occlusion discrepancies, making uniform feature sharing vulnerable to negative transfer. To tackle these issues, we model air-ground perception as a progressive cross-task collaboration task and construct the Air-Ground Progressive Collaboration (AGPC) benchmark, a spatio-temporally aligned benchmark comprising more than 745K raw video frames. Built upon this benchmark, we propose Socialized Co-Perception (SCP), a coarse-to-fine framework that organizes collaboration progressively from aerial global localization to ground target association and identity-aware parsing. Its core module, the Dual-Layer Router (DLR), decouples input-side multi-scale expert selection from output-side task-conditioned modulation, enabling selective cross-view and cross-task interaction while suppressing harmful interference. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of SCP. It achieves a 3.73% coevolutionary gain and a 7.86% improvement in average downstream performance. These results show that task-conditioned collaboration is more effective than uniform fusion for heterogeneous air-ground perception. The code is available at https://github.com/g1136639260-spec/AGSCP.

Automated AI agents are increasingly capable, yet many scientific and professional tasks require human judgment and contextual expertise. We use simulated shared-workspace human-AI teams as a controlled testbed for studying how collaboration structure shapes team behavior. Using the Collaborative Gym environment with tasks from DiscoveryBench, we vary team compositions and collaboration structures across 1,482 sessions. We find that adding additional collaborators can lower performance when coordination structure is absent. We then evaluate collaboration scaffolding that combines shared group memory with simulated human-in-the-loop (HITL) gates, where selected actions require approval from a designated simulated participant. This scaffolding improves performance, most clearly in three-person teams, with clearer responsibility signals and stronger routing of expertise to team actions. Overall, our results suggest that coordination structure is central to whether available capability improves team outcomes.

Collaborative human-object interaction shows dynamic and complex movements that require mutual anticipation and continuous adjustment between participants and the shared object. Modeling such collaborative multi-human object interaction (MHOI) scenarios requires high-quality data acquisition as a foundational step; however, this is challenging due to the inherent complexity of MHOI where human-human and human-object interactions occur simultaneously. Such complexity leads to noisy MHOI captures characterized by several artifacts: contact misalignment between hands and objects, motion jitter and temporal inconsistencies in the captured sequences, and missing or incomplete finger-level articulation details. To address these challenges, we present MOCHI (MOtion Enhancement of Collaborative Human-object Interactions), a two-stage framework for enhancing noisy MHOI data. Our approach first generates physically plausible hand grasps through optimization from noisy body input, producing grasps that are both physically plausible and semantically consistent with the body pose, where these optimized grasps are extended into complete hand-object interaction sequences. Consequently, the full-body motion for all participants are refined through a diffusion-based noise optimization framework that uses single-person motion priors. During the optimization process, we introduce optimization objectives to encode human-object and human-human interaction information within these single-person priors. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our pipeline across diverse MHOI data, either acquired by existing capture methods or synthesized by generative models. We further show robustness of our system across varying numbers of participants and types of interactions, and demonstrate various applications including keyframe-based MHOI creation and data augmentation through varying object geometries.

Drones hold promise for supporting emergency services, but their integration into workflows remains ad hoc and coordination-intensive. This paper addresses two research questions: how emergency teams want to collaborate with drones, and how to formalize these collaborations into repeatable processes. Based on four field trials and 95 interviews, we derive 44 interaction patterns grouped into 10 meta-patterns reflecting operational needs such as reconnaissance, communication, and logistical support. To structure these practices, we introduce DroneLets - a new class of design artifacts that extend Collaboration Engineering to embodied agents. DroneLets capture setup requirements, drone capabilities, environmental constraints, and coordinated actions across human and drone actors. They offer a modular framework for designing repeatable, scalable collaboration processes in emergency services, illustrated through patterns such as broadcasting to bystanders and post-fire monitoring. This work expands the scope of CE and provides a structured foundation for integrating autonomous drones into high-stakes field operations.

Large language models have accelerated the transition from passive conversational assistants to autonomous agents that can understand goals, plan actions, invoke tools, and execute multi-step tasks. Yet the capability of a single agent remains constrained by its local data, tool permissions, runtime environment, and governance boundary. This paper studies distributed general-purpose agent networks: open peer-to-peer networks in which heterogeneous agents deployed on personal devices, edge nodes, or autonomous computing environments can discover one another, establish trust, negotiate cooperation rules, and execute open-ended tasks. We argue that such networks cannot be obtained by simply combining existing peer-to-peer overlays with conventional multi-agent systems. Unlike traditional P2P networks, agent networks must propagate semantic declarations about intentions, capabilities, states, and cooperation constraints. We therefore propose a layered architecture centered on a protocol adaptation layer that connects upper-level task semantics with lower-level network operations. Based on this architecture, the paper identifies three core mechanism problems: semantic announcement propagation for collaborator discovery, verifiable identity and multi-topic reputation for cooperation governance, and semantic-gradient mechanism design for open task execution. For each problem, we present a technical route, including bodyless gossip with sequential logs, BAID-based identity binding with MG-EigenTrust reputation, and a Stackelberg-style mechanism-generation loop driven by semantic attribution feedback. We further report prototype overhead results for BAID-style tiered verification and mechanism-level simulations of MG-EigenTrust under cross-topic disguise-collusion attacks. The resulting framework provides a system-level foundation for open, trustworthy, and scalable agent collaboration.

Collaborative mobile manipulation requires robots to coordinate with a partially observed partner while physically interacting through shared objects. This is difficult because failures often arise not from poor local skills, but from mistimed waiting, yielding, pulling, releasing, or repositioning. We study this problem with two bimanual mobile manipulators coupled through rigid and deformable objects. We propose Sequential Asymmetric Imitation (SAI), a single-teleoperator curriculum for learning coupled multi-robot behaviors without synchronized dual-operator demonstrations or explicit inter-robot communication. SAI trains Robot A from unilateral demonstrations with a compliant human partner, trains Robot B against the deployed Robot A policy, and then refines Robot A using sparse interventions near coordination failures. This staged process exposes the policies to increasingly realistic partner behaviors, including delay, phase mismatch,insufficient yielding, and interaction conflict. Across real-world dual-robot manipulation tasks, SAI improves task success, phase synchronization, and partner-contingent yielding over independent imitation and curriculum-ablation baselines. These results suggest that physically coupled collaboration can be learned through the structure of the imitation curriculum, rather than through synchronized multi-operator demonstrations or explicit coordination mechanisms. More videos on project page:http://cyc0429.github.io/sai-project-page/