Domain Shift

Logic resynthesis preserves circuit functionality while changing gate vocabulary, topology, and structural statistics, creating domain shift for circuit graph neural networks (GNNs) without changing task labels. To study this setting, we introduce ReDIL-GNN, a resynthesis domain-incremental learning framework that adapts a fixed prediction or representation head as new synthesis styles arrive and evaluates retention on all previously observed domains. Because not every shift should be adapted blindly, ReDIL-GNN further introduces the Resynthesis Adaptability Index (RAI), a pre-adaptation score that combines adaptation need, source-equivalence recoverability, structural coverage, and update compatibility. We evaluate supervised hardware-security tasks and representation-learning models using task-native metrics for classifiers and source-equivalence retrieval metrics for embedding models, comparing naive fine-tuning with LwF, Online EWC, MAS, ER, A-GEM, DER++, ER+LwF, and equivalence-guided replay. Across the studied pipelines, RAI separates unsupported shifts from promising updates, ranging from 0.001 for a structurally uncovered GNN-RE ABC-rewrite shift to 0.824 for the best original-only GNN-RE adaptation case. In practice, ReDIL-GNN turns resynthesis-aware circuit learning into a deployment control loop: RAI screens each new synthesis flow before update, guiding whether to reuse the current model, apply retention-aware adaptation, or defer adaptation until the shift is better supported.

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems exhibit unequal error rates across speaker groups, motivating interventions on their internal representations. We ask whether speaker-linked attributes that are linearly readable from pretrained ASR encoders yield useful directions for reducing group word-error-rate (WER) gaps. Across Whisper-medium, HuBERT-large, and Wav2Vec2-large on Common Voice and the Speech Accent Archive, we probe every encoder layer for metadata-derived sex/gender, age, and native/accent labels; construct centroid and probe-derived directions; inject them at selected layers; and compare downstream probe trajectories with matched WER changes. Sex labels are highly decodable (best macro-F1 0.924--0.941), native/accent labels are also above chance (0.544--0.696), and age is weaker (0.354--0.397). Of 22 post-selected reruns, nine have 95% paired-bootstrap intervals entirely below zero, yet every absolute source-group WER reduction is below 0.7 percentage points. Conversely, a local target-class probe rate can rise from 8.09% to 99.87% while WER worsens. Linear readability is therefore neither evidence of causal use nor a reliable mitigation method. Our results motivate evaluating speech-bias interventions jointly at representation, propagation, and task levels.

Organizations increasingly use oversight loops where one large language model (LLM) audits another's outputs alongside procedural traces of claimed steps. A common concern about such LLM-as-a-judge pipelines is that detailed traces make overseers gullible. Using signal detection theory, we audit five LLM overseers on 19 compliance tasks (4,551 analyzed judgments), varying only trace detail and evidence labeling. With disconfirming evidence always visible, error detection remains near ceiling. Instead, elaborate traces shift the decision criterion toward rejection, increasing false alarms in susceptible overseers. Without option labels, human-validated reason coding shows about 60% of false alarms cite an inability to tie evidence to its option. Labels eliminate this stated reason, yet residual rejection of correct work persists in those overseers and rises with trace detail. Procedural traces thus act as governance artifacts that shape oversight decisions. AI auditors should be evaluated by their decision criterion and false-alarm behavior, alongside accuracy.

Brain tumor segmentation remains difficult because enhancing tumor (ET) has low contrast and overlaps surrounding tissue, while scanner and site variation causes domain shift. We propose DE-GAN, a contrast-enhancing conditional GAN that combines input-adaptive dynamic convolutions, style-aware feature mixing, and coordinate encoding to synthesize slice-adaptive FLAIR images. A label-guided, class-conditional target separates tumor-core (TC) and ET intensities while preserving anatomy. The generated FLAIR is concatenated with the original MR modalities and used to train a 3D U-Net. Across BraTS 2015, 2018, and 2019, DE-GAN improves segmentation over the baseline and static EnhGAN replacement on most reported TC/ET metrics, with the largest gains from retaining both original and enhanced FLAIR. Code and pretrained models are available at https://github.com/zkhansuri-ui/DE-GAN.

We study density ratio estimation and importance-weighted regression under target shift with continuous outputs. Under target shift, the conditional distribution of the inputs given the outputs remains invariant across the training and test distributions, while the output marginal distribution may change. Although this problem has been extensively studied for discrete outputs, the continuous setting is substantially less understood: the importance weights are determined by an unknown density ratio function, for which existing estimation methods lack explicit finite-sample convergence rates. We propose a spectral regularization method in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) for estimating the continuous density ratio from labeled training samples and unlabeled test inputs. Under a source condition with regularity parameter $ι>0$, we establish high-probability finite-sample guarantees and show that the estimator achieves the capacity-independent minimax-optimal RKHS-norm rate $O(n_η^{-ι/(2ι+2)})$. We then incorporate the estimated density ratio into importance-weighted regression and characterize the propagation of density-ratio estimation error to the final predictor. When sufficiently many samples are available for density ratio estimation, the resulting regression estimator attains the minimax-optimal rates of standard kernel regression. These results establish a finite-sample theory for continuous density ratio estimation and importance-weighted learning under target shift.

Prequential adaptation of frozen tabular foundation models under temporal drift, with each label revealed only after prediction, helps some deployments and harms others, yet current practice does not predict which. We study the sources and limits of these gains. A diagnostic anatomy attributes gains to four recurring mechanisms under a streaming protocol that removes three optimistic biases and quantifies a fourth. Within an agnostic total-variation drift class, the target conditional is only partially identified: its identified-set diameter, the \emph{wall}, is irreducible from unlabeled data uniformly in sample size. A second, orthogonal $L^2$ projection wall quantifies what the frozen representation cannot express. Two canonical mechanism priors collapse the first wall. Under stated nuisance-rate conditions, the wall can be estimated from labeled historical windows at a $\sqrt N$ rate above the margin threshold $\gamma^\star=d_0/(2\alpha_s)$. At $\gamma=0$, the conditional lower-bound program depends on an open affinity estimate; the positive-margin lower branch also remains open. Semi-synthetic data illustrate the finite-sample mechanism with calibrated exponents. Stream-level proxies on eight industrial streams fall on the difficult side under a stated roughness bound, while the equality case $\gamma=\gamma^\star$ remains unresolved.

Conformal prediction provides distribution-free uncertainty quantification under exchangeability. However, this assumption is violated by label shift, where the marginal distribution of labels changes while the conditional distribution of inputs given labels remains stable. Under such shifts, standard conformal procedures no longer maintain their intended coverage behavior. Existing approaches address this via importance weighting. They pair the reweighting with residual-based nonconformity scores that ignore predictive uncertainty. The resulting intervals have uniform width. Bayesian conformal methods produce adaptive intervals by leveraging predictive distributions. They evaluate conformity under the source predictive, which is misaligned with the target domain under label shift. We propose the \emph{Label-Shift-Adjusted Bayesian Score} (LSA score), a nonconformity score derived from a posterior predictive tilting identity. This identity shows that the target predictive is an importance-weighted transformation of the source predictive. We use it to derive a direct correction to the Bayesian score. We evaluate the method on molecular property prediction under controlled label shift. The LSA score consistently yields shorter intervals than residual-based and source-based Bayesian scores. Coverage in the target domain remains comparable. Under stronger shift, all methods incur some coverage loss due to pseudo-label-based density-ratio estimation. The LSA score is defined for any source predictive with a tractable log-density. We instantiate it with Bayesian Ridge Regression, where the correction admits a closed form.

Importance weights are essential in domain adaptation under label shift, yet their utility is often undermined by the finite sample uncertainty associated with their estimation. Existing methods typically analyze this uncertainty through Gaussian elimination on interval-valued linear systems, which leads to overly conservative confidence regions and inefficient downstream applications. We propose a paradigm shift from inversion-based inference to a direct matrix constraint framework. We use this framework to define a joint confidence region and extract marginal intervals via linear programming, deriving provably tighter bounds for importance weights while maintaining exact finite-sample validity. Furthermore, we analyze the confidence region's geometry and provide the theoretical results for its diameter bounds. Evaluated across text, image, multimodal benchmarks, including AGNews, MNIST, CIFAR-10, N24News, and a real-world autonomous driving dataset, nuImages, our approach consistently yields shorter confidence intervals and smaller prediction sets than inversion-based methods.

Generalization under distribution shift remains a core challenge in modern machine learning, yet existing learning bound theory is limited to narrow, idealized settings and is non-estimable from samples. In this paper, we bridge the gap between theory and practical applications. We first show that existing definition of concept shift breaks when the source and target supports mismatch. Leveraging entropic optimal transport, we propose a key notion: $\gamma^{*}\!$-concept shifts, and derive a general error bound unifying covariate and $\gamma^{*}\!$-concept shifts, which applies to broad loss functions, label spaces, and stochastic labeling. We further develop estimators for these shifts with concentration guarantees, and the DataShifts algorithm, which can quantify distribution shifts and estimate the error bound in most applications - a rigorous and general tool for analyzing learning error under distribution shift.

Synthetic data has become a promising way to scale model training beyond limited human-generated data but it may also induce strong model collapse (Dohmatob et al., 2024), where any fixed fraction of synthetic data prevents model performance from improving under data scaling, leaving a non-vanishing excess risk floor. In this paper, we study how synthetic data affects the generalization of one-pass SGD in high-dimensional linear regression with model shift. We establish finite-sample risk bounds for mixed and two-stage training, separating standard bias and variance from source-mismatch effects, namely fluctuation and persistent drift under mixing and filtered initialization bias under two-stage. These bounds reveal a sharp contrast: mixed training induces strong model collapse, while two-stage training avoids the floor by using synthetic data only in the first stage, showing that collapse is not inevitable under a simple data curriculum. Under a random sketch model, we further obtain scaling laws for both protocols, with tight results for mixed training in the optimization-saturated regime. These laws show that larger models may amplify synthetic-induced degradation under mixing, and quantify how high-quality synthetic pretraining may reduce bias in two-stage training. Finally, we establish an exact finite-sample necessary-and-sufficient condition for two-stage training to strictly outperform real-only training under the same real-data budget and identical real-stage updates. Overall, our results highlight that synthetic data is neither inherently harmful nor beneficial; its effect depends critically on both its quality and the training protocol used to incorporate it.

Long-term change understanding from images of the same place revisited over time is a challenging task with applications in map maintenance and urban infrastructure monitoring. Prior work addresses it either through pixel-level prediction or difference captioning, neither of which is sufficient to reliably measure how well models detect and describe such changes. We introduce SPOT-THE-SHIFT, a human-verified benchmark for grounded image difference captioning of long-term changes in real-world driving scenes. Our benchmark provides natural language captions and spatial masks for structural changes across each image pair. We further propose an evaluation protocol that reliably assesses models' captioning ability, validated through human studies. Benchmarking state-of-the-art MLLMs, we find that models struggle with the fine-grained multi-image spatial capability required for this task. Finally, we develop a synthetic data generation pipeline that improves an off-the-shelf MLLM without sacrificing general capabilities.

On-policy distillation (OPD) provides dense token-level supervision on student-generated trajectories. Although OPD performs strongly when teacher and student belong to the same model family, we find that its effectiveness degrades in cross-family settings even after tokenizer alignment, with substantially stronger external teachers offering little additional improvement. To understand this disconnect, we decompose the cross-family OPD signal into two components: an offset between a low-capability teacher-family reference and the student, and the within-family log-likelihood shift from that reference to the strong teacher. Standard OPD transfers both components together, allowing the offset to dominate the update direction and obscure the changes associated with teacher capability improvements. We propose CompassOPD, which removes this offset and transfers the within-family shift, while a frozen student reference anchors updates to the student's initial policy. Thus, both teacher-side and student-side changes are measured within their respective model families. Experiments across three student families and multiple teacher families show that CompassOPD consistently outperforms standard cross-family OPD, improving average reasoning accuracy by up to 5.50 points. For an MoE teacher, we further construct the reference directly from the teacher checkpoint by reducing expert activation, eliminating the need for a separate reference checkpoint while retaining a 3.43-point gain over OPD.

Excess vocabulary, a word's frequency above its pre-2023 trend, is how the change in scholarly English after 2022 has been measured. We adapt it to Korean with morphological units on 398,296 KCI abstracts (2018-August 2026), with 47,165 Vietnamese abstracts for comparison. Placebo floors are 0.1-2.2 points for the single-word statistic and at most 2.9 for the re-selected split-half set statistic. Korean abstracts show nothing in 2023, onset in late 2024, a rise through 2025 flattening in mid-2026: sisahada "suggest" appears in 21.4% of 2026 abstracts against 5.3% expected; plain verbs like araboda "look into" fall to a quarter of trend. Under stated assumptions the single-word conditional lower bound on LLM-processed abstracts is 3.5%, 10.5% and 16.1% for 2024-2026 and a split-half set bound 7.8%, 20.6% and 33.0%. Holzwarth et al.'s estimator under the same discipline gives 41.9% and 72.1% for 2025-2026. Subject-matter controls reduce but do not remove it: restricting the set to lemmas three language-model annotators all call style leaves 14.7 of the 33.0 points, and pairing each 2026 abstract with its journal's closest base-period abstract leaves 34.1. Tested translation routes do not explain it: the surface marks of translated Korean fall as the markers rise. In the same articles' English abstracts the excess appears a year earlier; where the English side carries none, the Korean shift persists at 30 to 66% of the rate where it does. Control abstracts from three providers reproduce the rising words, with marker turnover consistent with model generations; implied prevalences are scenario-dependent.

Understanding the composition of large-scale autonomous driving datasets is essential for safety, robustness, and reliable operation across domains. For example, domain shift between locations could lead to the operating environment being misaligned with the training data, resulting in potentially dangerous performance degradation. Yet, existing data analysis pipelines largely rely on metadata, predefined labels, or manual inspection, which provide limited semantic insight or do not scale. This paper studies set difference captioning: given two subsets of images, the goal is to produce a natural-language hypothesis describing differences between the target and reference set. Building on a two-stage formulation, we adapt the method to autonomous driving by focusing on object-centric patches derived from object detection, which simplifies aggregation and enables attribution of differences to specific object instances or categories. To evaluate this setting in-domain, we introduce a new benchmark, AD-Diff Bench. Low-concentration experiments assess the suitability of set-difference-captioning approaches to sparse, real-world differences. We restrict our experiments to open-weight models to support reproducibility and ease of deployment. The proposed benchmark and analysis provide a step towards practical, human-interpretable dataset introspection for autonomous driving datasets. Our implementation and benchmark dataset are available at https://github.com/KIT-MRT/AD-Diff

Beyond semantic content, camera parameters play a pivotal role in dictating the geometric perspective and appearance of any given image. While recent image editing models excel at semantic and stylistic manipulation, they struggle with explicit camera parameter control. When handling large perspective shifts, instruction-driven models face a dilemma: they either suffer from structural tearing or generate conservative outputs that ignore geometric instructions. To address this, we introduce CameraEditor, a framework that reformulates camera-controlled editing from a spatial problem into a temporal sequence prediction task. By leveraging the temporal coherence of video diffusion models, our approach integrates an explicit geometric perception module with a dynamic reference routing mechanism. This allows us to construct geometrically rigorous visual reference pairs via dynamic panorama cropping, overcoming the ambiguity of text-based instructions. Furthermore, CameraEditor strategically inserts intermediate transition frames to decompose large perspective shifts, providing a robust temporal buffer that preserves content identity and spatial coherence. We construct a training dataset of 5,760 instances. As an independent contribution, we introduce CamEditor-Bench, a model-agnostic evaluation suite of 462 test cases. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CameraEditor achieves state-of-the-art camera control precision and source identity preservation, outperforming existing methods.

Motor imagery (MI) electroencephalography (EEG) decoding could support post-stroke rehabilitation, but models developed on healthy cohorts may not transfer reliably to pathological EEG. We evaluated whether Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) can efficiently adapt three pretrained EEG foundation models (i.e., LaBraM-base, REVE-base, and REVE-large) for binary left- versus right-hand MI decoding. Frozen-backbone head-only baselines and LoRA adaptation were evaluated using subject-wise five-fold cross-validation on the PhysioNet EEG Motor Movement/Imagery Dataset and a binary subset of the UET175 dataset comprising 30 stroke participants. On EEGMMIDB, LoRA increased accuracy to 0.822 for LaBraM-base and 0.957 for REVE-base. On UET175, all head-only models performed near chance. With LoRA, LaBraM-base remained near chance (0.499$\pm$0.009), whereas REVE-base reached 0.847$\pm$0.194 and outperformed REVE-large (0.806$\pm$0.178), indicating that increased model capacity alone did not improve stroke-domain adaptation. The strongest stroke configuration, REVE-base LoRA, was further evaluated using within-cohort leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOOCV), showing 0.952 mean accuracy, but subject-wise accuracy ranged from 0.586 to 1.000, revealing a small low-performing tail. Zero-shot transfer from EEGMMIDB to UET175 remained near chance (0.464$\pm$0.072). These findings show that healthy-benchmark performance does not ensure transfer to stroke EEG. Translation of EEG foundation models to pseudo-online or real-time rehabilitation BCIs should therefore include target-domain adaptation and subject-level assessment of temporal informativeness, spatial sensitivity, and physiological discriminability.

Reconstructing editable Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models from images is essential for downstream modification, manufacturing, and design reuse. However, existing image-to-CAD methods are developed predominantly on synthetic renderings and face two coupled obstacles: a substantial appearance domain gap between synthetic and real images, and a previously overlooked parameter bias in widely used CAD data. We show that the local normalization adopted by DeepCAD concentrates several geometric parameters around a few discrete values while encoding substantial information in a single scale factor. Consequently, a model can achieve deceptively high parameter accuracy by exploiting these frequent values rather than inferring geometry from the input image. In this paper, we propose RealCAD, a unified framework that addresses these limitations at the representation, image, and feature levels. At the representation level, we redistribute scale information to the corresponding geometric parameters, producing less concentrated parameter distributions in a shared scale space. At the image level, geometry-constrained translation converts synthetic renderings toward the real-image domain while conditioning on object contours. At the feature level, a multi-positive contrastive objective aligns representations of the same CAD model across viewpoints and image domains, enabling CAD sequence prediction from each individual view. We further introduce OpenRealCAD, comprising four-view photographs of 392 3D-printed objects paired with ground-truth command sequences. Experiments show that the revised representation substantially reduces the accuracy attainable from parameter-frequency priors, making parameter accuracy a more reliable measure of image-conditioned geometric inference. RealCAD further improves real-domain command and parameter accuracy, while retaining competitive synthetic-domain performance.

Deep-learning models can achieve strong chest X-ray (CXR) classification performance without establishing whether their predictions predominantly rely on pulmonary image content. This study evaluates pulmonary attribution containment as an anatomy-related reliability property distinct from diagnostic performance. We propose DBCA-SegNet-MGAP, a multi-task anatomy-guided CNN-Transformer framework that combines complementary feature representations through bidirectional cross-backbone attention, predicts a soft lung mask, and incorporates this anatomical prior directly into classification through Mask-Guided Adaptive Global Average Pooling (MGAP). Pulmonary attribution containment is quantified using the Anatomical Local Energy Ratio (ALR) and high-intensity cumulative ALR (cALR@0.9). Experiments were repeated across three training seeds using the COVID-19 Radiography Database for four-class internal testing and a locked Shenzhen-to-Montgomery protocol for zero-shot external tuberculosis testing. On COVID-19, the proposed model achieved a weighted F1 of $0.9615 \pm 0.0015$ and macro ROC-AUC of $0.9906 \pm 0.0007$. In an architecture-matched dual-bridge comparison, replacing conventional GAP with MGAP increased ALR from $0.3878 \pm 0.0098$ to $0.7086 \pm 0.0104$ and cALR@0.9 from $0.5265 \pm 0.0101$ to $0.9905 \pm 0.0018$, while weighted F1 remained essentially unchanged ($0.9618 \pm 0.0015$ vs. $0.9615 \pm 0.0015$). Under locked external transfer to Montgomery, ROC-AUC remained $0.9080 \pm 0.0043$ and pulmonary ALR remained $0.6466 \pm 0.0081$, whereas weighted F1 decreased to $0.7528 \pm 0.0080$ and ECE increased to $0.1683 \pm 0.0055$. These findings show that diagnostic discrimination, calibration, and pulmonary attribution containment are distinct model properties and support their joint evaluation under internal testing and external domain shift.

Peptide-protein affinity models are often evaluated with a single data split, obscuring whether they interpolate among measurements for observed targets or generalize across peptide or target shifts. We integrated three sources of quantitative peptide-protein binding data to obtain 11,349 deduplicated pairs and benchmarked ten peptide representations, ESM-2 protein embeddings, and six regressors under peptide-similarity, within-target, and leave-target-out partitions. Across 60 matched representation-regressor configurations, mean test Spearman correlations were 0.462, 0.669, and 0.530, respectively. The top configuration shifted from ECFP-16 count fingerprints with random forest in the first two settings to HELM-BERT with Extra Trees when exact target sequences were excluded. Representation-rank correlations ranged from -0.042 to 0.624 across partitions, whereas regressor-rank correlations ranged from 0.771 to 0.943. Learning curves showed that representation differences were largest with limited supervision and narrowed as training data increased. PeptideCLM-2 adaptation and simple element-wise interaction features provided no consistent gain over a frozen encoder and direct concatenation under the tested protocols. These conclusions are specific to a dataset that pools transformed Kd, Ki, and IC50 measurements and to target exclusion at the exact-sequence level. Peptide-protein affinity benchmarks should therefore align data partitions with the intended use and jointly assess the effects of data scale, molecular representation, and downstream learner.

Reliable evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) and medical vision-language models (Medical-VLMs) requires calibrated confidence, particularly under realistic clinical conditions. However, existing efforts mainly focused on improving accuracy, leaving calibration in the medical domain underexplored. To this end, we propose MVC-Bench, a calibration-centric benchmark for medical image classification with VLMs and Medical-VLMs. MVC-Bench assesses the calibration across three axes: (i) robustness to modality, backbone, and domain shift (ii) effectiveness of calibration strategies and prompt-tuning methods (iii) stability under prompt-template and random-seed variations. The benchmark covers eight different backbones, three medical modalities, including fundus imaging, histopathology, and chest X-ray under in-domain and domain shift settings. It compares post-hoc calibration, train-time calibration, and zero-shot inference methods, together with six prompt-tuning methods. Across more than 1638 controlled experiments, we report accuracy and Expected Calibration Error (ECE) as primary metrics, and further report results with complementary calibration measures, including Maximum Calibration Error (MCE) and Adaptive Calibration Error (ACE). We further investigate the underlying causes of miscalibration in VLMs and Medical-VLMs and propose a simple train-time calibration method, Multi-Class Margin (MCM) regularization, which achieves lowest ECE on 10 out of 12 settings in in-domain and remains competitive under domain shifts. Collectively, MVC-Bench provides a structured evaluation framework and actionable guidance for improving calibration in safety-critical medical workflows.

Distributional shifts arise when the target deployment environment differs from the source environment that generated the training data. Robust learning frameworks such as Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO) and Robust Satisficing (RS) aim to address this challenge, yet their finite-sample guarantees under such shifts, and their systematic comparison, remain underexplored: existing analyses typically establish guarantees either in the source environment or for adversarial worst-case performance over an ambiguity set. This paper instead studies generalization error in the target environment---the excess loss under the shifted target distribution. Our contributions are threefold. First, we derive finite-sample generalization error bounds in the shifted target environment for both DRO and RS. These bounds explicitly characterize the trade-off between reduced sensitivity to shift and the regularization penalty induced by each method's robustness hyperparameter, and they avoid the curse of dimensionality associated with Wasserstein empirical concentration. Second, when partial shift information such as shift magnitude or direction is available, we propose information-directed hyperparameter calibrations and compare the two methods given the same information. Under these calibrations, and in the partial-information regimes we study, DRO and RS exhibit complementary theoretical and empirical behavior. Finally, we apply the framework to a network lot-sizing problem, using it to interpret how robust policies respond to positive shifts in the demand distribution. Together, these results fill a gap in understanding the statistical properties of robust learning methods under distributional shifts and provide a principled basis for comparing DRO and RS.

Leukemia cell image classification is challenged by real-world domain shifts from acquisition, staining, illumination, and site protocols, causing single-dataset models to generalize poorly in real clinical scenarios. This work presents a robust framework for leukemia classification across multiple heterogeneous datasets using a two-stage pipeline with a pretrained vision foundation model. Stage 1 performs binary classification (leukemia vs. non-leukemia) and is trained using 122,167 single-cell images. Stage 2 is conditionally applied to Stage 1 positives to perform subtype classification into Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), trained using 69,400 single-cell images. Labels are harmonized across five heterogeneous datasets to enable cross-dataset training, and performance is evaluated on a held-out dataset protocol to assess domain-shift generalization. Within this pipeline, three encoders are benchmarked (DinoBloom, pretrained on single-cell images; BiomedCLIP, pretrained on biomedical data; and CLIP as a general-purpose model) under linear probing, Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), and a Retrieval-Augmented Classification (RAC) module that retrieves the top-k most similar cell images to provide cytomorphological grounding. The objective is to quantify how much domain-specific pretraining contributes to performance under domain shift, and whether cost-effective adaptation and retrieval can be a viable alternative to expensive domain-specialized pretraining. The held-out protocol additionally serves as a diagnostic tool, revealing when classification performance is attributable to dataset-specific artifacts rather than to cytomorphological features.

Breast density classification is a critical component of breast cancer risk assessment, yet AI models often struggle to generalize across clinical sites due to vendor-specific acquisition styles. In this work, we introduce two new datasets, BreastMammo and DenseMammo, to facilitate robust multi-view mammography research. We propose a domain generalization framework that utilizes a foreground-only histogram matching protocol to resolve the domain shift issue arising from disparate clinical sources. Internal evaluation using a 5-fold cross-validation protocol demonstrates the efficacy of our approach, with the Swin Transformer backbone achieving a peak AUC of 98.32% for density classification. External evaluation on the TNMammo and LUMINA datasets demonstrates that the proposed approach consistently reduces domain shift, significantly outperforming prominent domain generalization paradigms, including MixStyle and Discrete-Fourier-Transform-based frameworks.

Model learning by an eavesdropper is treated as an estimation problem in a federated environment. The Fisher Information Matrix for the eavesdropper's estimation problem is driven to singularity through a signaling design; this ensures that the eavesdropper cannot learn the model. Herein, the innovation of prior designs is that model shifts are designed to maximize the difference in the model learned by Eve and the central server while satisfying a transmission power constraint for the agents. Two shift schemes are provided. MaxModShift outperforms a prior ModShift design while requiring lesser transmission power. Compared to a noise injection scheme, MaxModShift performs better while requiring a lower bandwidth secret channel and a reduced average power consumption.

Source-free domain adaptation (SFDA) adapts a source-trained model to an unlabeled target domain without source data, a practical setting under privacy or storage constraints. Yet its self-generated supervision can reinforce source bias under substantial domain shifts. Pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) offer complementary semantic knowledge, but the relative reliability of the source model and VLM varies across target samples. Existing cross-model guidance does not explicitly account for this variation and may overwrite valid source-derived evidence under conflict, a failure we term source-derived evidence forgetting. We formulate VLM-guided SFDA as a sample-wise reliability-allocation problem and propose Consensus-Driven Shift Modulation (COSMO). COSMO replaces expert-to-expert guidance with co-adaptation through an anchored shared consensus. It first forms a sample-specific initial consensus that favors the more concentrated prediction. During adaptation, COSMO re-aggregates both branches' evolving evidence and regulates how far the resulting consensus moves from its initial anchor based on consensus uncertainty and training progress. This keeps the shared supervision anchored yet adaptive. Across four benchmarks, COSMO achieves state-of-the-art performance under matched VLM backbones. Further analyses indicate that it better balances the retention of valid source-derived evidence with the absorption of complementary VLM evidence.

Parameter-efficient post-training reduces the number of trainable parameters, but still requires repeated end-to-end backpropagation through the frozen backbone. Every adaptation step therefore needs backward-capable hardware and must store or recompute activations. We ask whether this repeated backward chain can be replaced by a one-time calibration. We introduce Local Credit Assignment (LoCA), a two-stage method for small-shift adaptation. One probe backward pass fits a low-rank map at each transformer block from the final prediction error to a local hidden-state correction. LoCA then reuses these maps to form blockwise regression targets from forward activations and fits low-rank adapters with closed-form ridge solves. No further backbone backward pass is required. We evaluate LoCA on five discriminative benchmarks with Qwen2.5 models from 0.5B to 14B. In 16 of 25 reported task--scale comparisons, LoCA yields lower evaluation cross-entropy than the corresponding LoRA run. Its measured full-run GPU peak, including calibration, is 26--29% lower than LoRA's. After calibration, its CPU steady-state memory is 36--52% lower and its per-pass time is 43--48% lower. A shared scale-normalized candidate set is reused across all tested Qwen2.5 sizes and on SmolLM2-1.7B. LoCA thus amortizes global credit assignment into one calibration and enables later forward-only tuning when repeated backpropagation is impractical. The code associated with this paper is available \href{https://github.com/Xia12121/LoCA}{here}.

Conformal prediction (CP) is a distribution-free framework for uncertainty quantification that has recently been adapted to large language models (LLMs), providing prediction sets with finite-sample coverage guarantees under exchangeability. Yet for LLMs, nonconformity scores are often induced by an inference pipeline, not just a fixed model, making them depend not only on the data distribution but also on configurable factors such as the prompt template, decoding parameters, and deployment setting. Since such configurations are routinely modified in practice but rarely treated as a source of shift, their impact on CP validity remains poorly understood. We call this \emph{configuration shift} and study it systematically along three axes: prompt template, decoding temperature, and weight quantization. In a broad empirical study spanning $9$ LLMs, $4$ datasets, and $4$ nonconformity scores, we find that configuration shift consistently erodes CP validity, often driving empirical coverage below the target. By contrast, efficiency is largely preserved: valid prediction sets remain close in size to the i.i.d. baseline. We derive coverage lower bounds that attribute this loss to a discrepancy between calibration and test score distributions, and use their finite-sample plug-in versions as empirical diagnostics of shift severity. We further show that these findings lead to practical mitigations: bound-inspired recalibration is effective with limited test examples, while fragility-aware calibration ensembling recovers much of the lost coverage without test data.

Full-body capture from unconstrained photographs requires global correspondence across arbitrary views, poses, crops, and occlusions. Yet pose, geometry, and foundation features estimated in this setting are too unreliable for dense matching or appearance transfer, while diffusion rectifiers and optimization pipelines expose no common interface for consuming such uncertain correspondence. Our insight is that correspondence need not be locally accurate: its coarse viewpoint and body layout can still organize how a diffusion prior adapts and guides reconstruction. We introduce \emph{Astrolabe}, a host-portable adapter built on frozen viewpoint-guided spherical maps (SPH). A fixed bounded transform converts SPH into a spatial noise shift, which is matched during prior adaptation and reused during downstream denoising or score-distillation guidance in both pipeline categories. When a rectifier exposes a reference router, the same target/reference SPH additionally supplies coarse compatibility scores to select native appearance features; router-free optimization uses only the shared shift path. Astrolabe therefore follows one SPH--shift--adapt--guide process without dense warping or a learned control branch. Across Puzzle-IOI and 4D-Dress, it improves all reported image metrics in both hosts and all paired Puzzle-IOI geometry metrics; image gains extend to rear views, while 4D-Dress geometry remains stable overall.

Progress in large language models is often summarized using a single scalar measure, such as a time horizon, a latent ability estimate, or an aggregate benchmark score. These summaries capture the overall performance, but they do not test whether progress is distributed differently across task difficulty. We find that most of the apparent shift in gains toward harder tasks does not reflect a change in the shape of the difficulty-response curve. On METR time-horizon data, a single Rasch model with rising ability reproduces this pattern, so it is largely explained by ceiling effects rather than a qualitative change in capability. This echoes how the choice of metric can make claimed emergent abilities look like a property of the models themselves. We then identify a smaller hard-task effect that survives this control. Isolating it is difficult on agentic benchmarks, because newer models are usually run with newer agentic harnesses, so a gain on hard tasks cannot be assigned to the model or its scaffold. We break the confound with LiveCodeBench, a public competitive programming benchmark that runs no agentic scaffold while pairing dated models with an exogenous difficulty ordering. After accounting for the rise in overall ability, models released after September 2024 still gain on the hardest problems beyond what their easy and medium performance predicts, by about +0.40 logits under our most conservative assumption, raising the hard-problem solve rate from roughly 18% to 25%. The effect is led by the strongest reasoning models and holds for hard tasks that need only short reasoning, not autonomy over long horizons. We present this as a result specific to competitive programming, since our clean identification rests on a single coding benchmark. We release the LiveCodeBench Difficulty Panel (66 dated models x 1,055 problems) and our analysis code.

Face presentation attack detection (PAD) remains challenging under cross-dataset evaluation, where domain shift degrades models trained on a single dataset. The scarcity of large-scale labeled data motivates adapting pretrained vision models rather than training task-specific architectures from scratch, raising a fundamental question: do general-purpose vision foundation models encode PAD-relevant information accessible with minimal task-specific training? To investigate, we systematically evaluate 24 frozen encoders, including self-supervised vision transformers, vision-language encoders, and supervised CNNs, using a unified linear-probing protocol on the MCIO benchmark (MSU-MFSD, CASIA-FASD, Replay-Attack, OULU-NPU). The backbone remains fixed, and only a lightweight linear head is trained to isolate the PAD information already present in the pretrained representation. Results show that frozen foundation-model representations can support strong intra-dataset PAD performance with only a linear classifier, but this performance does not reliably transfer across datasets. Model scale is beneficial within several families, although the effect is not monotonic and is strongly mediated by architecture and pretraining. InternViT-6B achieves the lowest mean intra-dataset error, whereas CLIP ViT-B/32 offers the most favorable cross-dataset transfer-compute trade-off among the evaluated probes. These findings suggest that while pretrained representations contain PAD-relevant information, explicit adaptation remains necessary to address domain shift.

Background/Objectives: Dermoscopic skin-lesion classifiers lose accuracy when images arrive from a new clinic or a new device. We asked which data augmentations reduce that loss, and measured the effect under a protocol that keeps policy selection separate from policy evaluation. Methods: A ConvNeXt-Large binary malignant-versus-non-malignant classifier was trained on six dermoscopic sources (25,903 images); HAM10000 and ISIC 2016-2020 were held out of training entirely. Single augmentations, photometric combinations and eleven composite policies were ranked on a development split of 1511 held-out images. The winning policy was then evaluated on a confirmation set of 8073 held-out images that took no part in that ranking and from which we removed every image sharing a lesion identifier with the training data and every image contributed by an institution represented in training. Both policies were retrained with four random seeds each and compared with an exact permutation test. Results: The mix policy raised confirmation-set ROC-AUC from 0.787 to 0.826 (+0.039; per-seed ranges 0.772-0.797 and 0.815-0.840, non-overlapping; exact permutation p=0.029), with the same direction on each contributing source. At matched sensitivity the gain is larger in clinical terms: specificity rose from 0.612 to 0.713 at a sensitivity of 0.80, and from 0.284 to 0.397 at a sensitivity of 0.95. In-domain ROC-AUC was preserved (0.938 to 0.941). On an independent clinical cohort acquired with a different device at a different institution (472 images, 22 malignant), performance was maintained (0.934 versus 0.930). Conclusions: Augmentations that model the physical causes of domain shift improve cross-source transfer at no cost to in-domain accuracy, and the improvement survives a selection-disjoint, contamination-free evaluation.

Decision-makers in learning environments face a dilemma when their short-term optimal actions may not favor their long-term benefits the most. To understand the fundamental tradeoff behind the dilemma, we study adaptive experimentation with post-commitment reward shifts. During an experiment phase, the decision-maker may adaptively test multiple options; during a subsequent commitment phase, the decision-maker must commit to a single option, whose reward may differ from its pre-commitment reward. We propose the Reserved Arm Eliminations for Commitment (RAEC) algorithm, which reserves a predetermined portion of the experiment phase to identify the best post-shift option while using the remaining rounds to minimize short-run regret. We establish regret upper bounds for RAEC across all parameter regimes and matching minimax lower bounds, providing a tight characterization of the cost of balancing short-term performance and long-term commitment. We also study two extensions. With prior structural knowledge linking pre- and post-shift rewards, we show that correctly identifying the ranking-changing component of the shift is more important than estimating its absolute magnitude. For settings with concave commitment rewards and portfolio choice, we develop the Reserved Online Stochastic Convex Optimization for Commitment (ROSCOC) algorithm, which directly converts its reserved exploration history into a commitment portfolio and achieves tight regret bound. Finally, we also conduct numerical experiments which confirm that our proposed algorithms achieve the desired regret predicted by our theory, and also outperform other baseline algorithms.

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) classification is typically evaluated within a single dataset, yet clinical deployment demands robustness across acquisition sources, labeling policies, and patient populations. We examine this gap using Kvasir-Capsule, Capsule Vision 2024 (CV2024), and a shared-label subset of Galar. We fine-tune a suite of general-domain pretrained backbones on the official Kvasir-Capsule folds under a standardized protocol and evaluate the same checkpoints on two non-source targets within a documented shared-label decision space. We find that the predictive value of in-domain ranking is target-dependent: Kvasir-Capsule ranking aligns more closely with Galar than with CV2024, while the two non-source targets agree only weakly. Consequently, the strongest in-domain backbone leads on one target yet falls to mid-pack on the other, and no single evaluation target reliably predicts the others. A second CV2024-trained configuration set reproduces this target-dependent instability. We conclude that capsule endoscopy model selection should report cross-target ranking stability rather than peak single-dataset performance.

Time series foundation models (TSFMs) have emerged as general-purpose models for time series analysis, but pretraining alone is often insufficient for reliable downstream deployment. Bridging this gap requires further intervention to handle domain shift, task heterogeneity, limited supervision, and computational constraints, which motivates post-training as a broad class of methods to adapt, augment, compose, calibrate, or specialize pretrained TSFMs for downstream tasks. In this work, we analyze TSFM post-training methods based on their locus of intervention in the prediction pipeline, yielding five categories: parameter adaptation, context augmentation, model composition, output processing and uncertainty control, and compression and specialization. Within each category, we study main representative methods and discuss their current limitations. We further identify future directions toward controlled adaptation, reliable context construction, uncertainty-aware model composition, calibrated output processing, and deployment-aware specialization. Overall, by providing a unifying framework for the emerging TSFM post-training landscape, this work aims to support future research to navigate the design space between a pretrained TSFM and its reliable downstream deployment.

Cross-dataset generalisation remains a major barrier to clinical deployment of echocardiographic left ventricular segmentation, yet the sources of this shift are rarely disentangled. We examined whether transfer degradation could be estimated before deployment using handcrafted ultrasound descriptors, VAE latent features, and segmentation-derived latent features across six echocardiographic datasets. Geometry-aware preprocessing substantially improved several poor transfer cases, suggesting that much of the apparent domain shift reflects field-of-view and framing inconsistencies rather than intrinsic acoustic differences alone. Intensity z-normalisation changed dataset separability by less than 0.005, indicating that brightness and contrast are not the dominant shift axis. Absolute Dice drop on held-out source-target pairs was predicted with an R-squared value of 0.612, an MAE of 0.082, and a Spearman rho of 0.681. The variant without LV and fan-shaped features retained approximately 70% of this explanatory power, supporting mask-free transfer-risk monitoring. The most informative discrepancy measure depended on the representation, with CMD strongest in z-normalised handcrafted features, with an absolute r of approximately 0.86 and an R-squared value of approximately 0.70; log-Wasserstein strongest in VAE space, with an r of approximately -0.90 and an R-squared value of approximately 0.81; and log-MMD strongest in LV-segmentation latent features, with an r of approximately -0.92 and an R-squared value of approximately 0.84. Apparent vendor effects were largely dataset-confounded. Echocardiographic domain shift is therefore structured and measurable, and its impact on segmentation can be partly reduced through geometry-aware preprocessing and anticipated using representation-specific transfer-risk estimation.

Climate disclosure classification is a fundamental task for analysing corporate climate disclosures, yet such disclosures appear in many different sources -- annual reports, press releases, and earnings calls -- that differ in length, purpose, and writing style. Existing evaluations are mostly conducted within a single source, leaving open whether common LLM adaptation strategies remain effective under source shift. We reframe climate disclosure classification as a cross-source adaptation problem and study three widely used adaptation strategies -- definitions, examples, and fine-tuning -- across eleven open- and closed-source LLMs, using two corpora that share the same label space but come from different sources. We find that all strategies bring positive cross-source gains on average, but the strongest in-source strategies are not the strongest cross-source ones: similarity-based retrieval and LoRA fine-tuning gain most in-source but lose most of that advantage under source shift; randomly selected few-shot examples, a weaker in-source baseline, retain their advantage more reliably; definitions transfer most consistently, though only when their granularity matches the target text. Across these strategies, when the source changes, simpler is often safer.

Source-free universal domain adaptation (SF-UniDA) adapts a pre-trained source model to an unlabeled target domain under both covariate and label shifts, without access to source data. However, existing SF-UniDA methods rely on inefficient techniques such as threshold tuning and clustering. Foundation models (FMs), known for their generalization and zero-shot capabilities, remain underexplored in SF-UniDA. In this paper, we propose a framework that leverages foundation models (LFM) for SF-UniDA. We use a vision-language model (VLM) to compute similarities between target samples and text labels, including those for unknown classes generated by prompting a large language model. The label shift type is determined by analyzing the coefficient of variation of a similarity-based sample-level score. Unknown samples are identified using a binary Gaussian mixture model fitted to another similarity-based metric. Under a consensus strategy, the pseudo-labels generated by the VLM are refined by the target model initialized with the pre-trained source model, integrating knowledge from both the source domain and foundation models. Finally, these refined pseudo-labels are used to train the target model. Extensive experiments across all possible label shifts and multiple benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed LFM framework. Our code is available at https://github.com/iamjingli/LFM.

Drift detection is a core component of production machine learning monitoring systems, where detectors are used to compare incoming data with a reference distribution and trigger alerts when changes occur. However, these detectors are often evaluated in research settings that emphasize detection accuracy under synthetic shifts, while overlooking false alarms under continuous monitoring. In production environments, models are monitored repeatedly over time and across many features, and even small false positive rates can accumulate into frequent alerts, leading to alarm fatigue. We empirically analyze false positive behavior across five commonly used drift detectors: PSI, KS, MMD, LSDD, and adversarial validation. Consistent with existing literature, PSI exhibits strong sensitivity to batch size, producing frequent false alarms at small sample sizes; however, we further observe that its behavior stabilizes and improves substantially once batch sizes exceed approximately 200 samples. In contrast, KS, MMD, and LSDD display persistent fluctuations across batch sizes, while remaining comparatively more reliable than PSI in low-data regimes. Applying a Bonferroni correction reduces false positive rates, but often at the cost of reduced true positive sensitivity, reinforcing the well-known stability - sensitivity trade-off in drift detection. This work provides a systematic comparison of false positive behavior across multiple drift detectors under continuous monitoring conditions. We identify tradeoffs across detector families and provide practical guidelines for selecting and calibrating drift detectors in production ML systems.

Long-horizon rollout generation has become the dominant systems bottleneck in agentic reinforcement learning (RL). As agents interact with environments over many turns, trajectories rapidly grow to tens of thousands of tokens, making synchronous RL training increasingly constrained by rollout. We propose WAR, a workload-aware rollout system that substantially accelerates synchronous agentic RL by jointly optimizing decoding and scheduling. WAR is built on a key observation: the optimal rollout optimization strategy depends on runtime load: (1) Under low load, WAR enables model-free speculative decoding with SuffixDecoding, which reuses suffix patterns from previously completed trajectories as speculative drafts for future rollouts. Unlike model-based drafters, SuffixDecoding introduces no additional draft model and avoids GPU contention with rollout generation. (2) Under high load, where saturated batched decoding leaves limited room for speculative speedup, WAR shifts the optimization focus to cache-aware scheduling. A global scheduler places requests across rollout replicas based on cache locality, trajectory progress and server load, reducing redundant KV-cache recomputation and mitigating load imbalance. By combining decoding-level suffix reuse with system-level rollout scheduling, WAR delivers robust throughput improvements across workload regimes without changing the underlying RL algorithm. WAR improves long-context agentic rollout throughput by 1.4x under low load and up to 1.6x under high load. These results show that WAR removes a major rollout bottleneck in synchronous agentic RL and provides a practical path toward scalable long-context agent training.

We investigate which language model evasion attacks survive state-of-the-art adversarial fine-tuning, developing strategies that sweep the top 5 positions on the ELOQUENT 2026 Voight-Kampff leaderboard. While adversarial fine-tuning trivially closes the 2025 winning evasion recipes, we uncover a fundamental asymmetry in detector vulnerability: pushing generated text out of the detector's training distribution reliably defeats adversarial detection, whereas pulling it into the distribution (e.g., mimicking human training data) fails completely. Exploiting this, we introduce two novel out-of-distribution attack families - cross-decade register attacks and modernist stream-of-consciousness form. Both strategies easily bypass adversarial closure, achieving up to approximately 50x higher fool rates than previous methods while preserving naturalness. Furthermore, experiments show that the obvious deployer countermeasure (augmenting training data with period prose) fails to close the vulnerability. Our findings show that the tested detector families, including adversarially fine-tuned ones, exhibit persistent vulnerabilities under structural out-of-distribution shifts, a mechanism that directly powers our leading competition performance.

A language model may be asked either what experts believe about a contested claim or what it believes about the claim itself. A trustworthy conversational agent should distinguish these two requests and respond in different epistemic registers: neutral attribution in the first case and stance expression in the second. Whether such a shift occurs-and whether it occurs coherently-is not directly assessed by existing benchmarks for accuracy, instruction following, or safety. We introduce ESFP, a behavioral benchmark that treats the contrast between externally attributed and self-attributed prompts as the fundamental unit of measurement. ESFP consists of 104 carefully controlled items spanning six epistemic categories and five phrasing templates, and evaluates model responses along four complementary dimensions: lexical self-attribution, representation-level responsiveness to role framing, sentence-level stance content density assessed by an LLM judge panel, and cross-condition stance consistency. Evaluating eight frontier models from five vendors, we find that epistemic flexibility is largely orthogonal to general model capability: a 27B open-weight model matches the strongest proprietary systems, the flagship model of one family underperforms its lightweight counterpart, and reasoning-optimized models do not consistently exhibit higher flexibility. Stance content density provides the strongest signal, while surface-level lexical markers such as 'I think' can change substantially without corresponding changes in expressed stance. We provide item-level bootstrap confidence intervals, weight-sensitivity analyses, and an explicit discussion of the interpretation limits of the composite score. ESFP measures a model's propensity to adapt its epistemic stance under changing attribution conditions, rather than a general competence measure.

Background: Deep learning models can classify thyroid nodules on ultrasound, but reliable clinical decision support also requires calibrated probabilities, uncertainty estimation, and selective referral, particularly under dataset shift. Methods: We developed a calibrated deterministic five-member deep ensemble for ROI-based thyroid nodule classification and selective image-based triage. TN5000 was used for model development, five-fold cross-validation, member-wise vector-scaling calibration, and fold-specific threshold selection. TN3K served as an independent external dataset-shift evaluation. The framework used ConvNeXt-Tiny with squeeze-and-excitation attention, ensemble-mean malignancy probability, and mutual information (MI) as an ensemble-disagreement score. A three-tier policy assigned images to No-FNA suggestion, FNA recommendation, or radiologist review. Results: On pooled out-of-fold TN5000 predictions, the ensemble achieved AUC-ROC 0.9395, AP 0.9715, ECE 0.0088, and Brier score 0.0813. At 50% nominal MI retention, 7.2% of cases received a No-FNA suggestion, 39.9% an FNA recommendation, and 52.9% radiologist review, with 98.3% No-FNA NPV and 99.83% malignancy capture. On TN3K, AUC-ROC decreased to 0.7870, AP to 0.7254, ECE increased to 0.1899, and Brier score to 0.2281. The frozen TN5000 policy assigned 83.7% to review, 1.0% to No-FNA, and 15.3% to FNA recommendation. No malignant image entered the No-FNA pathway, but FNA-recommendation PPV fell to 76.6%. Conclusion: The framework showed strong internal discrimination and calibration, but limited external threshold transportability. Selective prediction may help identify images unsuitable for automated triage, but local recalibration, threshold validation, and prospective clinical evaluation are required before deployment.

We introduce NAILS (Normative Alignment of Recommender Systems via Internal Label Shift), a simple and scalable method for aligning recommendation outputs with target distributions over item-level attributes, such as categories. Recommender systems optimized solely for user engagement often fail to satisfy broader normative objectives, including fairness, diversity, and editorial values. NAILS modifies the user-conditional item distribution to induce a specified marginal distribution over attributes while preserving the preferences learned by an existing recommender system and requiring no model retraining. We formulate this problem as a form of label shift applied internally within a hierarchical classification framework. By adopting a stakeholder-centric perspective, NAILS enables recommendation outputs to be aligned with global normative objectives. Empirically, we show that NAILS consistently improves attribute-level alignment with minimal impact on user engagement, providing a practical mechanism for value-driven recommendation.

Underwater object detection is strongly affected by domain shift, where performance can vary significantly across different locations, habitats, and deployment conditions. However, detector performance is typically evaluated using aggregate metrics that hide failures in specific environments, while existing domain generalization benchmarks often rely on synthetic variations that do not reflect real-world conditions. We introduce a framework that characterizes underwater images by appearance, scene composition, and acquisition geometry to assign domain labels. Using this framework, we perform the first systematic study of how domain factors influence both human annotation quality in underwater object detection datasets and deep learning-based detector performance, revealing substantial domain-dependent discrepancies. By incorporating physically meaningful domain labels, domain shift becomes something we can characterize, measure, benchmark, and act on. We highlight how this can be used to guide data collection and annotation, design more informative benchmarks, and assess detector robustness across diverse underwater environments.

Foundation models are increasingly used as image feature extractors for mammography, but their robustness under external domain shift remains unclear. We benchmark 15 foundation-model backbones across breast density, BI-RADS severity, and cancer status using a unified frozen-backbone linear-probe protocol, training on 3 source datasets and evaluating on 12 task-compatible out-of-distribution (OOD) datasets after label harmonization. Mammography-specific vision-language models (Mammo-FM and MaMA) provide the strongest mean OOD performance, but robustness is not explained by mammography exposure alone. DINOv3 remains a competitive vision-only baseline, and mammography-adapted pretraining does not consistently improve generalization. Dataset-level analysis further shows that even leading models show heterogeneous performance across datasets. Feature-space inspection reveals that useful representations can preserve clinical signal while retaining dataset and acquisition structure. These findings highlight dataset-level OOD evaluation as a central criterion for assessing mammography representations. Our code is publicly available: https://github.com/biomedia-mira/mammo-ood.

As audio-visual generative models evolve into world simulators, cross-modal synchronization stands as a critical proxy for assessing the consistency of world dynamics and causality in generated content. However, existing evaluation metrics presume structural correctness, reducing synchronization to mere temporal alignment. Consequently, they fail on generative outputs, especially when exhibiting structural hallucinations and asymmetric cross-modal relations, which currently \textbf{mandate expert human annotation to assess synchronization.} This dependency introduces a critical paradox: \emph{human evaluators rely on relative, reference-dependent comparisons, whereas automated metrics require reference-free, absolute scalars.} We resolve this paradox by proposing a framework that distills relative human perception into a continuous, globally consistent metric. First, we introduce SynthSync, a dataset of generative failures ranked via pairwise human annotations. Second, we adapt the Omni-LLM equipped with a continuous latent projection to translate relative human rankings into continuous absolute values. Third, we propose Real-Valued Group Relative Policy Optimization ($\mathbb{R}$-GRPO) to internalize the global causal structure of synchronization via listwise score distributions. Empirically, our metric achieves state-of-the-art human preference alignment. We leverage this estimator to establish a standardized benchmark, advancing AV-Gen assessment from low-level signal correlation to visually grounded causality.

While closed-loop motion planners trained on large-scale, object-level datasets, e.g., nuPlan, demonstrate strong in-distribution (ID) performance, their generalization to novel urban topologies and recovery mechanisms following execution perturbations remain under-explored. To address this, we present Shift & Drift, a novel dual-track benchmark designed to rigorously stress-test motion planners across two critical axes of distribution shift: (1) The Semantic Shift Track leverages a novel conversion pipeline that transforms the aerial, DeepScenario Open 3D dataset into the nuPlan simulation framework. This enables zero-shot evaluation of planners trained on North American and Singaporean data against 1,182 scenarios spanning four German cities and the US city of San Francisco featuring dense pedestrian-cyclist interactions. (2) The State-Distribution Drift Track injects stochastic perturbations into the ego vehicle's dynamics to quantify robustness against compounding execution errors. Based on this, we systematically evaluate the failure modes of diverse planning paradigms under semantic and state-distribution shifts. While imitation learning methods achieve high scores in ID benchmarks, they exhibit significant failures under semantic shift, particularly in pedestrian-dense environments, and suffer from persistent drift when subjected to temporally correlated actuation noise. In contrast, the evaluated reinforcement-learning-based planner demonstrates more graceful degradation, maintaining higher safety and progress metrics across both tracks. Our findings reveal an empirical trade-off between imitation fidelity and closed-loop resilience, providing the community with a rigorous benchmark to evaluate progress toward reliable deployment.

Large Language Models achieve strong code generation for high resource languages like Python and Java but suffer sharp performance drops on Low-Resource Programming Languages~(LRPLs) such as Julia. Improving Small Language Models~(SLMs) for these languages faces a trilemma: Supervised Fine-Tuning~(SFT) is bottlenecked by data scarcity, inference-time scaling is too expensive for deployment, and Reinforcement Learning from scratch yields near zero advantages. We propose a three-phase pipeline that resolves this trilemma by decoupling syntax acquisition from algorithmic reasoning. First, we \emph{left-shift} inference-time compute to an offline data synthesis engine that uses iterative compiler and test feedback to generate verified training examples. Second, we fine-tune an SLM on this synthetic, verified data to embed strong syntactic priors. Third, we apply Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward~(RLVR) grounded by language-agnostic Input/Output tests, where the SFT prior constrains exploration away from syntax errors. Applied to Qwen3-8B, our pipeline improves pass@1 by up to +7.6 points on MultiPL-E and +14.2 points on the Agnostics LiveCodeBench for Julia compared to SOTA results. Furthermore, the pipeline only used $\frac{1}{3}$ data and $\frac{1}{6}$ cost over the previous state-of-the-art. We further demonstrate that the pipeline generalizes to Ballerina achieving 49.7% MultiPL-E Pass@1, a language with near-zero pretraining representation. Ablations confirm that both the SFT phase and execution-grounded rewards are necessary for stable training.

Robustness to domain shift is a key requirement for floor plan generative models to be applicable beyond the single dataset they were trained on, as floor plans vary widely across regions due to distinct architectural cultures, spatial constraints, and construction practices, while acquiring new annotated datasets remains costly and domain-specific. Yet, no prior work has studied this robustness in the context of conditioned floor plan generation. In this paper, we evaluate state-of-the-art models from two fundamentally different generative paradigms across three public datasets (RPLAN, MagicPlan and Swiss Dwellings) and show that they are highly sensitive to domain shift, with up to an order of magnitude performance degradation when transferred across domains. To mitigate this with minimal target-domain supervision, we introduce a procedural method to generate a large-scale synthetic training dataset that enforces strict physical constraints (non-overlapping rooms, valid door placement, graph consistency) while intentionally sacrificing architectural realism through highly irregular spatial arrangements and aggressive geometric perturbation of room shapes. We show that pre-training on this synthetic data considerably improves zero-shot cross-domain performance, outperforming in-domain training on MagicPlan. Furthermore, it provides a highly effective initialization for fine-tuning, accelerating target domain adaptation and outperforming real-world initialization baselines by up to 40% in a low-data regime.

Accurate long-term forecasting in complex systems is frequently compromised by dataset-level distribution shifts, where diverse underlying behavioral modes and evolving system states drive the dynamic multivariate time-series. While existing methods predominantly focus on local temporal shifts, they fail to explicitly model the global structural challenge where datasets are composites of distinct operational regimes. In this paper, we propose NEST, a specialized framework designed to model and recompose these evolving structures through a two-phase dense MoE architecture. NEST first facilitates structural specialization by partitioning the dataset into distinct operational regimes through unsupervised clustering in a principled moment-entropy space. We introduce a regime-oriented router mechanism that generates initial expert weights based on temporal content, subsequently refined through geometric modulation to regime centroids. Crucially, rather than acting as monolithic predictors, individual experts function as specialized kernels that capture regime-specific dynamics by evolving unique variate-attention patterns. Extensive evaluations on diverse benchmarks, including heterogeneous network traffic and physical phenomena, demonstrate that NEST consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/Aaralshin/NEST

In non-stationary streaming environments, simultaneously adapting to complex, non-linear domain shifts via continual learning while mitigating the catastrophic effects of severe, uncalibrated label noise poses a fundamental mathematical challenge. In this paper, we propose \FlatManifold{}, a novel, streamlined robust continual learning framework that utilizes a Nyström manifold flattening map based on the kernel trick and projection onto an orthogonalized Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS). Unlike traditional methods that rely on complex, error-prone sample-filtering pipelines, the proposed approach exploits the intrinsic mathematical robustness of the flattened space itself. By mapping feature distributions onto a fixed orthogonal target topology with a ridge regularizer, the framework naturally smoothes and counteracts the influence of extreme label noise during the optimization process. Concurrently, catastrophic forgetting is prevented via a continual topology brake term that leverages the covariance matrix of past experiences. Extensive evaluation on real-world multi-session robotics datasets demonstrates that even under severe conditions featuring 40% symmetric label noise, \FlatManifold{} successfully mitigates gradient corruption. Under extreme cross-session domain shifts spanning various seasons and lighting conditions, the proposed framework establishes high generalization capabilities, significantly outperforming standard sequential optimization baselines and proving that structural linearization itself serves as a powerful mathematical barrier against distributed label corruption.

Workforce scheduling is an NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem requiring simultaneous satisfaction of labor regulations, coverage requirements, employee preferences and operational objectives. Existing CP formulations typically model simplified instances with 6-12 constraints at shift-level granularity and critically lack explicit support for: mandatory break scheduling with midpoint placement control; acuity weighted workload equity; sub-shift temporal granularity enabling demand-driven staffing; inter-week schedule stability; and cross-midnight shift patterns common in 24-hour operations. This paper presents CP-WSP: a declarative CP-SAT framework enforcing 14 hard constraints as mathematically inviolable requirements (zero regulatory violations by construction) while optimizing 15 soft objectives through a unified weighted penalty function -- all configurable via a JSON specification with no code changes required. Key contributions include: a shift-window variable decomposition enabling mandatory break scheduling with centrality control; acuity-weighted workload equity; multi-granularity temporal resolution from 30 minutes to 2 hours; inter-week schedule stability; a grid-offset preprocessing technique for cross-midnight shifts; and a reproducible 36-configuration benchmark suite for community comparison. Evaluated on INRC-II benchmarks at both hourly and shift-level granularity and on 36 synthetic configurations.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models often fail to perform the same learned tasks under environmental shifts, such as changes in camera pose and shifts to a different but similar robot (e.g., from Panda to UR5e). Adapting these models to the shifted environment (i.e., target domain) often requires training on multiple demonstrations for each task, which are costly to collect. To reduce the burden of data curation and training, we propose an analogy-based method that adapts VLA models under environmental shifts through weight vector arithmetic with domain-specific information addition, named Domain ARiThmetic (DART). Unlike prior approaches, DART requires collecting only a single demonstration, enabling efficient adaptation. To accurately isolate domain-specific information for addition, DART performs subspace alignment between singular components in weight vectors to filter out noisy components. In both simulated and real-world experiments, DART outperforms existing VLA adaptation methods in one-shot scenarios across diverse visual and embodiment shifts. Code is available at https://github.com/snumprlab/dart.

This paper presents a safety-centered empirical evaluation of uncertainty-aware last-layer adaptation for referable diabetic retinopathy screening using RETFound, a self-supervised vision-transformer retinal foundation model used here as a frozen feature encoder, and the public APTOS 2019 and DDR diabetic retinopathy fundus image datasets. We compare a cached-feature softmax head, post-hoc temperature scaling, variational Bayesian last-layer heads, a diagonal Laplace last-layer approximation, and an SNGP-style cached-feature head. On APTOS, uncertainty-aware operating points improved sensitivity and selective-referral behavior. The strongest APTOS selective-referral result deferred approximately 20 percent of cases and reduced accepted-case false negatives to zero while preserving high accepted-case specificity. However, threshold tuning also reduced false negatives at high false-positive cost, so false-negative reduction alone was not unique to Bayesian modeling. On DDR, native Bayesian heads qualitatively reproduced the APTOS direction but with weaker tradeoffs, while the APTOS-trained SNGP checkpoint transferred poorly and failed to provide useful external selective-referral behavior. These results highlight the value of safety-centered evaluation beyond aggregate accuracy: uncertainty-aware last-layer heads can improve internal safety-oriented operating points, but trustworthy retinal screening claims require explicit safety-coverage evaluation and second-dataset validation under shift.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances LLMs by incorporating external knowledge to support response generation. However, conflicts between retrieved context and parametric knowledge have emerged as a critical challenge in RAG systems. To mitigate such conflicts, numerous studies have attempted to identify and edit knowledge-related internal neurons, aiming to improve the ability of LLMs to rely on contextual evidence during generation. However, these neuron-level approaches may introduce unintended cascading effects that compromise the general capabilities of LLMs, as the modified neurons are often entangled with broader model behaviors and functionalities. In this paper, we introduce SHIFT, a novel framework that reformulates neuron-level modification as learnable gate modulation, allowing LLMs to adaptively regulate internal activations for knowledge conflict resolution. Technically, our SHIFT equips LLMs with a lightweight gate module and optimizes fewer than 0.01% trainable parameters while keeping the backbone model frozen. During generation, the gate module adjusts the model's internal representations to adaptively leverage contextual and parametric knowledge. Extensive experiments on six datasets validate the effectiveness of our SHIFT in comparison with various competing baselines. All datasets and code are available at https://github.com/OpenBMB/SHIFT.

Personality prompting shapes how large language models communicate, yet whether these behavioral shifts affect objective task outcomes remains under-explored. Prior work shows that agents prompted with low agreeableness produce adversarial language, while those prompted with high agreeableness become cooperative, but the relationship between communication style and task performance has not been systematically examined across multiple domains. In this work, we investigate whether personality composition matters for multi-agent team performance by manipulating personality traits across frontier LLMs on three task domains: structured coding, open-ended research collaboration, and competitive bargaining. We find that personality effects depend critically on task structure. In coding tasks, low agreeableness leads to large communication shifts that have little effect on milestone completion. In open-ended collaboration and bargaining, the same manipulation substantially degrades performance. We discuss implications for multi-agent system design and the limits of personality manipulation.

Shift-variant image degradation is frequently encountered in practical imaging systems where the point spread function (PSF) varies across the image field due to motion, optical aberrations, atmospheric turbulence, or sensor-related effects. Unlike shift-invariant, shift-variant degradation presents significant challenges for image restoration because the degradation process cannot be represented by a single convolution kernel. This paper proposes a singular value decomposition (SVD)-based framework for restoring images degraded by shift-variant motion blur. The proposed approach determines the contribution of small singular values using a singular-value energy retention criterion. Specifically, the number of small singular values is selected based on a specified percentage of cumulative singular-value energy, providing a systematic approach for controlling noise amplification while preserving useful image information. The degradation model is formulated using a position-dependent PSF represented by a shift-variant imaging operator. Three representative one dimensional shift-variant motion PSFs are considered: bidirectional linear motion, Gaussian motion, and simple harmonic motion. The image degradation process is modeled as a linear system, and SVD is employed to analyze and invert the corresponding degradation operator. The singular-value representation provides insight into the ill-conditioned nature of the restoration problem and enables the development of stable inversion techniques. The proposed SVD-based restoration algorithm is applied to three degraded images. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in recovering image details and reducing blur artifacts under different motion models.

Predicting transcriptional responses to genetic perturbations could reduce the experimental burden of functional genomics, but extrapolation to genes that were never perturbed during training remains difficult. We present Stable-Shift, a structured method for estimating unseen-gene responses. Stable-Shift aggregates single-cell measurements into perturbation-level expression shifts, fits a low-rank response basis using training perturbations only, and predicts an unseen gene's coordinates in that basis from biological context. The context combines STRING interactions, network structure, control-cell expression statistics, and Gene Ontology annotations; the evaluated implementation uses graph convolution to integrate these inputs. On the supplied K562 Perturb-seq benchmark, Stable-Shift obtained 0.592 cosine similarity, compared with 0.569 for GEARS, together with higher Spearman correlation and top-gene precision among the evaluated methods. Its mean cosine similarity over five unseen-gene splits was 0.589 +/- 0.008. The same ordering was observed in the supplied graph-aware, residualized, gene-space, and Norman-dataset comparisons. These results support further study of biologically structured latent-response prediction, while the lower gene-space accuracy and sensitivity to sparse graph neighborhoods limit the scope of the present conclusions.

Prompt-injection detectors are deployed as guards: a model scores an input and a downstream system trusts or blocks it on that score. I study the confidence of these scores, not only their accuracy, when the attack distribution shifts away from the clean benchmark on which the operating point was chosen. I evaluate three released detectors, ProtectAI-v2 and two Prompt-Guard-2 checkpoints, at a single source-calibrated threshold that I freeze and transport across five shifts. I report a severity metric S, how confident a detector is on the attacks it misses, alongside the false-negative rate and discrimination. Across every shift and every detector, severity on the missed attacks stays between 0.99 and 1.00 while the false-negative rate ranges from 0.01 to 0.97: when these detectors miss, they miss with near-certainty. All three confidently pass indirect behavior-hijack injection, a blind spot unanimous across two vendors and a fourfold size range. Standard pooled calibration error does not register this; one detector it rates well-calibrated, at 0.06, is miscalibrated at 0.91 on the attacks alone. Run against live models, the missed injections leak the majority of working exploits, passing them at the rate they catch others. A controlled experiment traces the cause to content-keying rather than injection structure, an instruction-tuned model used as a judge shows the same hijack blind spot, and a black-box rewriter exploits the content-keying to manufacture working confident misses, most effectively on the most dangerous attack category. Code and data are public.

Supervised learning demands large quantities of labeled data, a bottleneck that is expensive and reliant on domain-specific expertise. Self-supervised learning, particularly contrastive learning, has emerged as a compelling alternative, enabling rich representation learning directly from unlabeled data. Yet its success hinges critically on the design of positive and negative sample pairs. Existing approaches for time series rely on hand-crafted augmentations and masking heuristics that embed strong domain assumptions, often limiting generalization across diverse temporal patterns and potentially introducing spurious correlations. In this work, we challenge this paradigm by demonstrating that explicitly encoding temporal shift invariance through a simple, deterministic view construction is sufficient to learn strong representations for time series classification. By exploiting temporal structure, our method, Shift Invariant Feature Training (ShiFT), achieves state-of-the-art performance on six diverse real-world time series benchmark datasets, as well as the UCR and UEA archives, while reducing training time. Beyond empirical performance, we present a systematic analysis of contrastive learning dynamics in time series settings, examining the effects of batch size and the number of negatives on downstream performance. Our findings provide practical insights for designing efficient contrastive learning frameworks for time series representation learning. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/sfi-norwai/ShiFT.