Dead Reckoning

Early recognition of lane-change intention is essential for proactive decision-making in autonomous driving and advanced driver assistance systems. This paper proposes a Dual Neural-Calibrated Interacting Multiple Model (DNC-IMM) that improves adaptability to driving context while preserving the probabilistic structure and interpretability of a conventional IMM. The proposed method encodes driving-context information, including target-vehicle motion, gaps to surrounding vehicles, and relative velocities, with a neural network that calibrates both the transition-probability matrix and measurement likelihoods. The final intention is determined from the calibrated IMM mode posterior rather than from a separate direct classifier. Experiments on the highD dataset demonstrate that the proposed method reliably recognizes lane-change intentions before lane crossing and provides particularly strong performance at the earlier 2-3 s prediction horizons.

Public trust in Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) may depend not only on technical success but also on the fairness of their decision making. While a recent trend in AV research involves using general purpose "common sense" models to guide AV decision making, the degree to which these inherit human biases in driving is still understudied. Given that psychology studies have shown human driver biases exist, such as lower pedestrian-yielding rates to Black pedestrians in the US, we argue that analyses of model bias should also be part of AV evaluation. Concretely, in this paper we propose two new bias testing methodologies for Large Language Models (LLMs) and Visual-Language Models (VLMs)-"All Else Being Equal" tests and "Self-Consistency" tests-in order to assess bias in pedestrian-yielding decisions. Our findings show that both LLMs and VLMs make yielding decisions which are influenced by pedestrian gender, ethnicity, religion, disability, age, skin tone and socio-economic status. While the type and degree of bias is different from model to model, we highlight common patterns-and raise questions about the "common sense" model paradigm, particularly the need to either revise the paradigm or address issues of downstream bias.

We present Qwen-Drive-1.0, an initial step towards a vision-language foundation model for autonomous driving. Qwen-Drive-1.0 retains the architecture of the pretrained vision-language model (VLM) and integrates 3D perception, visual question answering, and motion planning within a unified framework. An external bird's-eye-view (BEV) perception head jointly performs 3D object detection, semantic occupancy prediction, and BEV map segmentation. It serves as a probe of the 3D information accessible from the shared representations and provides an explicit, inspectable interface to 3D scene structure. A Planning Expert conditions on shared VLM representations to generate future ego trajectories. A staged training recipe combines driving supervision with general-purpose vision-language data to acquire driving-specific competence while helping preserve broad visual understanding and instruction-following capabilities. Experiments demonstrate strong 3D perception and driving scene understanding while largely preserving general vision-language capability. Comprehensive evaluations across open-loop, pseudo-closed-loop, and closed-loop settings further show highly competitive motion-planning performance.

Training autonomous driving policies through pure self-play has recently shown promising results. Following Gigaflow and Puffer- Drive, we train driving policies in a similar self-play fashion, but extend the models from MLPs to Transformers and train on the high-definition map of a real city, where we ultimately aim to deploy them. On the CARLA and Waymax benchmarks, our policies fall short of Gigaflow, and we trace the gap to specific failure modes, including reward hacking at traffic lights and a missing incentive to stop at stop signs. We further analyze which traffic rules emerge from self-play and how closely they match human driving, and we confirm that reward conditioning yields the intended diversity of driving behaviors. A demonstration of a trained policy is available at https://laursisask-ut.github.io/eccvdemo.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models promise to bring end-to-end reasoning to autonomous driving, but their computational cost remains far too high for real-time control. The core challenge is structural: VLA inference is not a single bottleneck but a cascade of four. Visual encoding wastes compute on overlapping video frames; language-model prefill recomputes context that could be carried over from the previous timestep; reasoning tokens are generated serially despite low entropy; and flow-matching denoising applies uniform compute to a non-uniform velocity field. Addressing any one stage in isolation leaves the others untouched. We propose FlashDrive, an algorithm-system co-design framework that targets all four stages simultaneously. Our key insight is that each bottleneck admits a distinct, lightweight algorithmic shortcut: temporal overlap enables streaming KV-cache reuse across frames; the low per-token entropy and strong intra-block correlations of driving-domain reasoning make a non-autoregressive diffusion drafter highly effective for speculative decoding; and the velocity field's structure---sharp at the endpoints, flat in the middle---permits adaptive step caching that concentrates compute where it matters. Layered on system-level CUDA Graph compilation and kernel fusion, these techniques compound. Applied to Alpamayo 1.5-10B with W4A8 quantization, FlashDrive reduces end-to-end latency from 717ms to 151ms (4.7x) while leaving accuracy essentially unchanged: minADE6@6.4s shifts by only 0.08m, minADE1 improves, and closed-loop collision and off-road rates improve in simulation. By raising a 10B-parameter reasoning VLA from 1.4Hz to 6.6Hz on a single GPU, FlashDrive moves end-to-end autonomous driving substantially closer to real-time deployment.

In-vehicle music can serve as an adaptive interface to enhance driver experience, attention, and well-being. We present Drive-to-Music, a context-aware system that generates music in real time from multimodal driving signals. Using dashcam imagery and vehicle telemetry, the system extracts scene semantics and driving context, maps them to high-level musical descriptors, and conditions generative audio models to produce contextually aligned soundtracks. The architecture combines perception and generative components to translate visual and kinematic inputs into structured musical attributes and synthesize audio with low latency. It supports smooth transitions as driving conditions evolve, and to ensure robustness and deployment readiness, we incorporate constraint-based controls and safety checks across the generation pipeline. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of real-time, context-aware music generation in automotive settings, providing a foundation for personalized and adaptive in-vehicle audio experiences.

Closed-track testing plays a fundamental role in the verification and validation of automated driving systems (ADS), particularly for safety-critical scenarios, by enabling reproducible evaluation under controlled conditions. However, most existing approaches still rely on standardized protocols or predefined trajectories, leading to overly scripted interactions and limited ability to reproduce the natural complexity of public-road traffic. To address this limitation, we propose Video2Track, a framework that transfers real-world interactive driving scenarios from videos into steerable adversarial closed-track testing. The framework consists of two tightly coupled modules. The first is a scenario semantic mapping module, which extracts structured semantics from driving videos using a vision-language model and grounds them onto a closed-track topology library via retrieval-augmented generation, thereby identifying compatible map segments and interaction anchors. The second is a dynamic interactive testing module, which conditions on the grounded topology and anchors to generate diverse multi-agent trajectories through a conditional diffusion model, while regulating interaction intensity via a Stackelberg game with a parameterized adversarial objective. Closed-track experiments demonstrate that the proposed framework can faithfully reproduce representative real-world interaction scenarios and generate executable scenario variants with controllable risk levels and interaction styles, providing a scalable approach for realistic and steerable ADS validation.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models can connect scene understanding, semantic reasoning, and trajectory generation for autonomous driving. However, verbose natural-language Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is poorly suited to real-time control because it is open-ended, costly to decode, and difficult to optimize as an action-facing representation. We propose XCoT-VLA, which replaces descriptive rationales with compact executable CoT tokens learned from automatically constructed Reason-Action supervision. Logged trajectories provide action evidence, while scene context supplies causal semantics. The predicted XCoT sequence remains in context and conditions fixed trajectory queries through shared multimodal self-attention. Deterministic token-function routing applies the Reason FFN to XCoT tokens and the Control FFN to trajectory queries for flow-matching trajectory generation. We further introduce XCoT Policy Optimization (XCPO) as an optional refinement extension in the same executable token space. XCoT-VLA reduces longitudinal ADE from 1.645 to 1.323 on a general-distribution set and lateral FDE from 1.616 to 0.648 in lane-change scenarios. By representing driving-oriented reasoning with only 2-6 executable XCoT tokens, our method substantially reduces autoregressive reasoning overhead and remains within the real-time planning budget. These results demonstrate that driving-oriented reasoning can be compact, executable, and directly connected to trajectory generation.

Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced scene understanding and enabled explicit reasoning in end-to-end autonomous driving. However, existing methods insufficiently integrate spatial-physical evidence into planning reasoning, while reasoning adaptation remains coarse-grained and falls short of scene-specific planning demands. Furthermore, reasoning-path optimization for higher planning quality remains largely unexplored in autonomous-driving post-training. To address these limitations, we propose FactorDrive, an end-to-end autonomous driving framework for adaptive multi-step reasoning driven by planning-critical factors (PCFs). We first perform large-scale driving-domain instruction tuning to establish foundational driving knowledge. Building on this foundation, we construct PCF-CoT, a chain-of-thought (CoT) dataset that grounds planning reasoning in trajectory-relevant spatial-physical evidence and organizes reasoning around scene-specific PCFs, enabling the composition and depth of reasoning paths to adapt to different planning demands. We further introduce Quality Search-Guided Group Relative Policy Optimization (QS-GRPO), which guides Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with trajectory-level planning rewards to discover reasoning paths with higher planning quality and uses the resulting responses to optimize the policy through GRPO, thereby improving trajectory planning performance. Extensive experiments on both open-loop (nuScenes) and closed-loop-oriented (NAVSIM) benchmarks demonstrate that FactorDrive achieves state-of-the-art planning performance.

Current hazard detection systems in autonomous driving may develop mesa objectives, learned internal goals that achieve high training performance through spurious correlations rather than genuine hazard recognition. We investigate whether human gaze patterns, captured via webcam-based eye tracking (WebGazer.js), can serve as privileged information to constrain mesa-objective formation. We collected 137,663 frame-level gaze samples synchronized with hazard annotations across 388 real dashcam clips, then test this hypothesis across two calibration protocols (9-point/45-click and 11-point/440-click), two model architectures (Random Forest and causal Transformer), and five random seeds per experiment with paired t-tests. No experiment yields a statistically significant improvement from gaze (p = 0.919, 0.578, and 0.667 respectively). A geometric analysis reveals the root cause: WebGazer's reported error (~130-257 px depending on configuration) exceeds 93% of detected hazard object sizes (median 36 px), rendering object-level gaze attribution physically impossible at this instrument precision.

Vision-language-action (VLA) models route driving decisions through a deep language model, but it is unclear how much of that depth the action itself requires. We study a representative driving VLA whose entire plan is carried by a single planning token that a generative planner decodes into a trajectory. Borrowing the planner as a trajectory-space logit lens, we decode the planning token from every one of the 32 decoder layers and measure two signals: the linear decodability of the navigation command and trajectory compatibility with the frozen native planner. Our diagnostic shows that semantic intent is linearly decodable early: command-probe accuracy reaches 97.7% after the first decoder layer, compared with 16.7% chance. In contrast, compatibility with the frozen native planner improves gradually across depth, with open-loop Avg-L2 reaching its minimum of 2.11,m only at the final layer. Learned readouts from the first layer recover much of this gap, indicating that planning information is already present early but is not yet represented in the format expected by the deployed planner. Ranking decoder layers by the angular deviation they induce in the planning token permits removal of 8 of 32 layers within an approximately 5% relative open-loop error increase and yields a measured 1.33$\times$ decoder speedup. At the evaluated sample size, no family-specific degradation is statistically resolved. These findings are limited to the evaluated ORION checkpoint and Bench2Drive setup.

Capturing the strategic decision-making inherent in competitive human driving is critical for autonomous vehicle safety and traffic simulation. This study demonstrates that game-theoretic Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) provides a robust framework for this challenge. We present a comprehensive analysis comparing data-driven IRL models against an established physics-based game-theoretic approach for predicting aggressive, safety-critical cut-in lane changes. Using the high-fidelity highD dataset, we systematically develop and evaluate a series of IRL models with increasing feature complexity. Our results reveal significant advantages: the best-performing IRL models achieve an overall prediction accuracy exceeding 75 percent while maintaining a Cut-In precision up to 51 percent and recall up to 49 percent. This represents a significant improvement over the established physics-based benchmark, which achieved only 4.4 percent precision in these high-stakes scenarios. The analysis reveals a clear trade-off: incorporating granular, instantaneous features yields higher precision, while adding temporal consistency features maximizes recall. These findings suggest that IRL-based models can effectively bridge the gap between microscopic driver intent and macroscopic safety outcomes, providing a more reliable foundation for modeling interactions in mixed-autonomy environments.

Defensive driving scores are useful only when they preserve distinctions between policies that observe surrounding actors and those that do not. Re-simulation benchmarks may use reference-conditioned forgiveness, under which an agent receives credit when the logged human reference fails a compliance channel. When agent and reference share an unstable rollout transformation, this rule can propagate shared reference failures into broad compliance credit. We audit this risk in NAVSIM v2.2 original scene single-stage scoring. Under the affected documented-stack condition on the audited numerical backend, the route-blind Ignore-All probe and a route-aware actor-blind probe outrank human replay and PDM-Closed over the complete 12,146-token navtest split. A fresh installation following the public specification reproduces rollout divergence on a fixed 32-token diagnostic set. A same-source dependency stack control and an exact-input diagnostic isolate dependency-sensitive numerical behavior in the shared velocity refit. On a 450-token control pool, replacing only the solver eliminates rollout divergence and restores blind-last ordering while keeping forgiveness enabled. Thus, the numerical instability is the direct trigger. Reference-conditioned forgiveness propagates the resulting shared reference failures into compliance credit. We contribute an audit protocol requiring score basis and stack disclosure, blind probes, overwrite reporting, and rollout stability tests before using such scores for defensive driving claims.

Existing autonomous-driving world models typically perform dense prediction of future videos, occupancy states, BEV representations, or agent motion. We argue that planning need not reconstruct the complete future world, but only focus on scene features that affect future ego action. Based on this perspective, we propose Auto-JEPA, an action-oriented latent world model that learns continuous future driving intent through joint-embedding prediction. Given visual observations, egomotion history, and navigation commands, Auto-JEPA predicts an intent embedding aligned with the latent representation of the future ego trajectory. The predicted intent retrieves executable trajectories from a fixed trajectory memory, which are then ranked by a scene-conditioned candidate selection module. Auto-JEPA keeps the visual encoder frozen, requires no explicit perception annotations, and uses no learned trajectory generator. By optimizing only task-specific modules for trajectory representation, intent prediction, and candidate selection, Auto-JEPA achieves 91.3 PDMS on NAVSIM v1 and 89.1 EPDMS on NAVSIM v2. Semantic occlusion experiments show that masking dynamic-agent regions induces an average intent change 2.97x that of equal-area random masking. Moreover, occluding vehicles that affect future driving substantially changes the predicted intent and selected trajectory, whereas both remain essentially unchanged when non-influential vehicles are occluded. These results show that future-intent prediction encourages the model to focus on planning-relevant visual features and supports high-quality planning without dense future-world modeling.

Driving style captures stable, driver-specific patterns in how a vehicle is driven. In naturalistic data, however, this signal is hard to isolate because drivers are observed in different vehicles, on different roads, and under different conditions, so models may mistake vehicle- or situation-specific regularities for driver-specific style. We introduce DriveDNA, a large-scale naturalistic dataset and benchmark for personalized driving-style modeling, comprising 4,121 drives from 465 drivers across 115 vehicle models and totaling 975 hours of human-controlled driving at 10 Hz with forward video, collected from community drivers in everyday use. DriveDNA defines driving style as a consistent, driver-specific behavioral pattern in how a vehicle moves under similar conditions. The benchmark evaluates this signal through three core tasks: few-shot driver re-identification, personalized behavior prediction, and condition-matched comparison, and provides behavioral annotations plus 276,248 rule-generated maneuver events across six classes with large-scale human auditing. We evaluate baselines spanning classical descriptors, supervised and self-supervised time-series encoders, multimodal fusion, probabilistic prediction, and zero-shot foundation models under a fixed multi-seed protocol. Learned representations substantially outperform classical descriptors on unseen drivers (AUROC .935 vs. .707) and retain driver-specific information under matched driving conditions, while descriptor performance approaches chance. Video-only models achieve comparable re-identification accuracy but exhibit severe route leakage, showing that strong recognition may arise from contextual shortcuts rather than driving behavior. These findings show that reliable driving-style evaluation must assess both the behavioral value of learned representations and their robustness to vehicle, drive, and condition confounds.

Defensive driving is widely recognized as an advanced driving skill. However, whether and how defensive driving affects driving safety remains insufficiently investigated. This study examines the behavioral characteristics of defensive driving, its impact on driving safety, and the underlying mechanisms. First, defensive driving is defined regarding operational timing and application scenario. Then, 82 participants are recruited for driving simulator experiments, with their behavioral and eye movement data being collected. Following the experiments, participants are categorized into groups based on the frequency of defensive driving behaviors exhibited. Finally, both inter-group and inter trial comparisons are performed on the experimental data. Experimental results demonstrate that in the inter-group comparison, the high defensive driving capability group exhibits higher acceleration and deceleration magnitudes, lower average speeds, and larger average absolute yaw angles compared to the low capability group, alongside shorter fixation durations and reduced fixation frequencies. Moreover, we observe that these participants tend to initiate defensive or evasive actions earlier, resulting in lower scenario risk. Regarding the inter-trial comparison, we observe similar trends exclusively in the low capability group, whereas most metrics show no significant differences between Trial 1 and Trial 2 in the high capability group. These results reveal that drivers possessing defensive driving capabilities tend to execute more intense driving maneuvers and identify risks and take action earlier, thereby enhancing driving safety. Findings support the promotion of defensive driving and provide a basis for relevant training programs. Meanwhile, they offer insights for the training of autonomous driving algorithms with defensive driving capabilities.

This study introduces a vision-language pipeline that detects risky driving behaviors and generates emotionally expressive responses to support driver awareness and comfort. Although vision-language models have advanced perception and reasoning in autonomous driving, existing systems rarely consider the emotional dimension or real-world user experience. Keep Yelling Assistant (KYA) detects high-risk driving maneuvers in real time, such as sudden cut-ins. It then produces emotional responses through a large language model tailored to driver preferences. The framework comprises two core modules. The vision module uses YOLOv8 variants to detect nearby vehicles and identify risky behaviors such as sudden cut-ins. Key driving metrics, including relative distance, speed, and projected reach time, are extracted and normalized to produce a structured behavior log. The language module processes this log with user-defined emotional tone settings, such as neutral, humorous, and analytical, and generates verbal reactions using state-of-the-art large language models, including ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3, Gemini 2.5, and Copilot. We evaluated the proposed system using dashcam videos containing risky driving behaviors and a user study involving 108 participants. Participants selected preferred response styles, and the large language models were evaluated based on emotional alignment. All models received favorable ratings, although preferences varied across personas. Notably, the combination of YOLOv8s and ChatGPT-4o achieved the highest score of 4.29 out of 5.00. By integrating real-world perception with emotionally adaptive dialogue, KYA introduces a new paradigm for emotionally intelligent in-vehicle artificial intelligence. It offers promising directions for improving safety, trust, and emotional well-being in both conventional and autonomous vehicles.

Understanding driver emotion and state is critical for the next generation of intelligent in-cabin systems that ensure safety and enhance human-vehicle interaction. However, existing public datasets for in-cabin affective computing are largely limited to visual modalities and rarely include conversational information, making it difficult to capture the linguistic and interactive cues underlying driver emotion. To address these gaps, we introduce InCarEmo, a multimodal dataset for in-cabin emotion recognition and driver state monitoring. InCarEmo integrates RGB and infrared video, in-cabin audio, and dialogue text collected from scripted in-cabin scenarios designed to simulate realistic driver behaviors, covering diverse lighting conditions and driving contexts. The dataset supports three primary tasks: 1) multimodal emotion recognition, 2) fatigue detection, and 3) distraction monitoring. In addition to the original Chinese data, we construct an auxiliary English benchmark to support preliminary cross-lingual evaluation. We provide a unified benchmark with extensive baseline results across unimodal and multimodal methods, including analyses under modality-missing and noise conditions. Experimental results demonstrate the benefits of multimodal fusion and reveal remaining challenges under real-world noise and low-light conditions. By releasing InCarEmo, we aim to establish a comprehensive foundation for robust, interpretable, and human-centric in-cabin affective understanding, promoting safer and more empathetic driver-vehicle interaction.

This study investigated the public acceptance of Society of Automotive Engineers Level 3 conditionally automated cars, which can self-drive under certain specified conditions but require the human driver to remain ready to resume control when requested. Previous Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2)-based research has focused mainly on European samples, and so it is still unclear whether the same factors shape acceptance across broader world regions. This knowledge gap was addressed using the L3Pilot Global User Acceptance Survey. From an original dataset of 18,631 respondents, the final analytic sample comprised 18,603 respondents from 17 countries across Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. The data were analyzed using a UTAUT2-based structural equation model to examine how performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and hedonic motivation shape the intention to use Level 3 cars. The model showed strong explanatory power. Across the analytic sample, the intention to use Level 3 cars was driven mainly by performance expectancy, social influence, and hedonic motivation. Effort expectancy and facilitating conditions also contributed, but they played smaller direct roles. Age, gender, and previous experience with advanced driver assistance systems were statistically significant, but comparatively weak predictors. Overall, the findings suggest that the acceptance of Level 3 automated cars depends less on demographic characteristics or ease-of-use concerns and more on whether people see the technology as useful, socially supported, and enjoyable to use.

Interactive driving, wherein an intelligent lead vehicle equipped with real-time traffic data coordinates route choices of connected vehicles, offers a promising approach to dynamic traffic management. To address the challenge of harmonising decisions, this paper considers the strategic information revealing framework of Bayesian persuasion. Here, the principal (lead vehicle) aims to guide the agent's (connected vehicle) partially observable sequential decision making towards its own objectives by selectively revealing information, such as real-time traffic ahead, using signals. However, the agent's farsighted response to maximize its long-term reward, renders the principal's signaling strategy design computationally challenging. We propose an online structured reinforcement learning framework to synthesize computationally efficient signaling strategy which is persuasive for a far-sighted agent. The main contributions of the paper are as follows: (i) For a monotonic agent with approximate best response, we propose MAPL, a structured policy learning algorithm for faster online learning, (ii) Identification of sufficient conditions for the supermodular structure of the Q function of the principal for a monotonic agent, (iii) Identification of sufficient conditions to ensure the persuasiveness of the principal's signaling strategy, (iv) Supermodular Q learning for Principal (SQP), which leverages the supermodular structure of principal's action value to synthesize computationally efficient signaling strategy that is persuasive for a monotonic learning agent, (v) Numerical analysis considering a real-time application of Bayesian persuasive driving for lane selection demonstrates that the proposed method is 30% cost efficient for optimising travelling rewards of both the lead and connected vehicle compared to the existing methodologies for signaling strategy design.

Vision-language agents (VLAs) are increasingly used to interpret complex driving scenes and support safety-critical reasoning. This report presents the CVPR 2026@AdvML Workshop Challenge on adversarial multimodal attacks against autonomous-driving VLAs. Built on DriveLM-style multi-view visual question answering, the challenge represents each scene with six synchronized camera images and a structured collection of driving-related question-answer pairs. Participants generate adversarial images and suffix-only textual perturbations that induce model responses to deviate from reference answers while preserving image fidelity and limiting textual cost. The competition comprises two phases, with Phase II adding a hidden black-box model to assess transferability. We describe the task design, submission rules, evaluation protocol, and leaderboard results, and then examine five leading submissions for which technical reports were available. Across these reports, several recurring patterns emerge: image-side attacks are favored by the suffix penalty; scene-level, multi-view optimization is more effective than treating views in isolation; QA types and graph structure provide useful priors for allocating attack budget; feature-space objectives can improve black-box transfer; and typographic content embedded in camera images exposes a persistent vulnerability in driving VLAs. These findings provide a practical reference for future robustness evaluation and defense design in multimodal autonomous-driving systems.

Autonomous-vehicle motion planners must resolve conflicts among safety, regulation, comfort, and efficiency in real time while exposing those decisions for audit. We present W-SQP, a weighted tiered-slack nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC) that compiles nine driving-rule families into a four-tier shared-slack nonlinear program solved online with CasADi and IPOPT; the name denotes the weighted quadratic slack penalty, not a sequential-quadratic-programming solver. Strongly separated tier penalties bias residual violations toward lower-priority rules while leaving actuation bounds hard. The controller replans from its executed state at $10$,Hz and records per-rule residuals on every cycle. A $90$,ms solver-time limit returns an anytime iterate that is projected through the vehicle dynamics before execution; median and maximum observed wall-clock solve times were $28$ and $104$,ms. We evaluate W-SQP in closed loop on 150 Waymo Open Motion Dataset scenarios in Waymax against reactive and proposal-and-select baselines, and introduce a log-independent protocol that separates safety and regulatory compliance from resemblance to the recorded human trajectory. Under this protocol, W-SQP shows no systematic group-level deficit relative to expert replay on the log-independent safety and regulatory rules, with several localized regressions in the hardest, highest-divergence scenarios. The results characterize W-SQP as an auditable, priority-biased, anytime-capable NMPC prototype rather than a hard-real-time or formally safe controller.

Underwater dead reckoning estimates vehicle position when vision is unavailable and external positioning cannot be assumed. A single set of filter parameters can work well in many situations, but fixed tuning may be poorly matched during turns, motion transitions, or periods when sensor measurements are less reliable. This paper presents the Situation-Triggered Calibrated Adaptive Robust Extended Kalman Filter for a BlueROV2. An onboard probabilistic trigger identifies the current motion situation while one error-state filter runs continuously. When the trigger is confident, the filter changes only to the corresponding pre-calibrated process- and measurement-noise matrices; the state estimate, covariance history, dynamics, and measurement models are not reset or replaced. The trigger, noise profiles, and a one-time Doppler velocity log yaw-alignment correction are calibrated offline using sparse AprilTag-supervised pool runs. A separate validation set selects the scheduling policy, which is then fixed before held-out testing. Across four held-out pool runs, the method reduces label-weighted mean per-run translation root-mean-square error from 0.488 m to 0.471 m relative to the same filter backbone with one global noise profile, and every held-out run favors the scheduled method. A paired bootstrap over 10-second segments gives a candidate-minus-baseline difference of -0.017 m with a 95% confidence interval of [-0.024, -0.008] m, while orientation error remains essentially unchanged. These results indicate that situation-aware covariance scheduling provides a modest but consistent vision-free dead-reckoning improvement without switching estimators or resetting the filter.

Recent studies on multimodal traffic accident understanding have mainly relied on infrastructure-camera footage, satellite imagery, or structured crash records. However, such data sources are costly to deploy and maintain at large scale, and they cannot objectively capture what the driver was actually able to observe before the accident. In contrast, ego-view accident videos directly represent the driver's visual perspective, making them suitable for reasoning about avoidability and driver responsibility. In this paper, we introduce responsibility distribution estimation for ego-view traffic accident videos, a new task in which a model predicts the percentage of responsibility assigned to each involved agent. We construct an LLM-assisted responsibility annotation pipeline and fine-tune multimodal large language models under multiple input settings, including raw frames, segmentation-enhanced input, and textual descriptions. Experimental results establish a strong initial benchmark, demonstrating that multimodal LLMs can effectively perform this nuanced, constraint-based reasoning task. Our findings suggest that ego-centric accident videos provide a promising foundation for socially and legally meaningful multimodal reasoning beyond conventional accident classification and explanation tasks.

Personalized driving can improve the user acceptance of automated driving systems. However, existing methods still provide limited support for translating natural-language driving preferences, especially when such preferences are expressed implicitly, into executable and distinguishable driving behaviors. This paper proposes a large language model (LLM)-supported personalized driving framework for highway lane-change scenarios. The framework maps natural-language driving commands to executable planning parameters in the open-source Apollo automated driving stack according to three driving styles: aggressive, normal, and conservative. To establish this mapping, candidate planning parameters are evaluated based on the resulting lane-change behaviors, and style-specific parameter sets are constructed through clustering and style-intensity ranking. For command interpretation, a retrieval dataset is constructed to support retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), enabling LLM-based interpretation of implicit user commands. Experimental results show that the derived parameter sets generate distinguishable personalized lane-change behaviors, while RAG consistently improves preference interpretation, particularly for implicit commands. These results indicate the potential of integrating LLM-based natural-language interaction with Apollo to support personalized lane-change behavior generation. The source code and the relevant datasets are available at: https://github.com/ftgTUGraz/LLM-Personalized-Driving.

Understanding human responses to autonomous vehicle (AV) behaviors is essential for socially aware interaction, which is crucial for socially compatible navigation in shared traffic environments. We characterize human driving responses in interactions with AVs as feedback laws over the coupled state space of the human driven vehicle and the AV. We model the human driver's actions using a response map, a concept based in game theory, and employ a linear representation to capture driver behaviors as a function of AV behaviors, based on empirical data from a driving simulator study. Our results show that 1) human driver acceleration behavior can be captured using response maps, and 2) human driver responses differ significantly with respect to AV behaviors of yielding, non-yielding, and responsive to the human driver.

When people share experiences online, they often express thoughts in two ways: a star rating and a written review. In sentiment analysis, ratings are widely used as convenient weak labels for textual sentiment, yet whether the two actually agree is rarely questioned. This study investigates sentiment-rating incongruence, where the sentiment expressed in review text differs from the sentiment implied by the assigned star rating, in Sri Lankan tourism attraction reviews. A dataset of 16,156 reviews from 2010 to 2023 is analyzed using a transformer-based sentiment pipeline that derives textual sentiment independently of assigned ratings. Incongruence occurs in 18.6% of reviews and falls into six directional patterns, with Conservative Rater and Obligatory 5-Star behaviors accounting for the majority of mismatches. Prevalence also varies across venue types, with museums showing the highest rates. Statistical tests, logistic regression, Random Forest, and SHAP analysis identify venue type, reviewer expertise, review length, and temporal factors as contributors to rating-text divergence. Overall, this study demonstrates that star ratings are not interchangeable with textual sentiment and should be validated before being treated as ground-truth labels in NLP.

This paper examines the critical role of intent-sharing in enabling effective maneuver coordination for connected and automated vehicles (CAVs). Successful maneuver coordinations require vehicles to accurately know other vehicles' driving intentions. Intent-sharing can be achieved by the remote vehicles directly communicating their plans with the ego vehicle, as opposed to the ego vehicle predicting the trajectory on the remote vehicles' behalf. In this paper, we investigate the potential of intent-sharing on maneuver coordination effectiveness by quantifying the percentage of successful coordinations. We analyze the potential of intent-sharing by comparing its effectiveness for coordinated lane changes in a highway scenario with the effectiveness of a trajectory prediction method based on current kinematic data. Our analysis demonstrates in two scenarios substantial improvements in maneuver coordination when CAVs have direct access to the nearby vehicles' driving intentions through intent sharing. These findings highlight the importance of including intent-sharing in the maneuver coordination protocol.

Existing driver intervention systems rely on auditory alerts and fixed templates, failing to leverage multi-task recognition outputs. General-purpose metrics such as BLEU and BERTScore cannot capture intervention-specific quality dimensions including risk-urgency alignment, cognitive load, and driver acceptability. In this paper, we propose the Driver Safety-Aware Intervention Score (DSAIS), a domain-specific metric evaluating five dimensions through a hybrid architecture combining lightweight rule-based computation with LLM Judge evaluation, together with an end-to-end framework integrating four-task recognition outputs into an LLM through risk fusion, state history management, and dynamic prompt construction. Experiments on the AIDE dataset with five models and seven conditions demonstrate that DSAIS achieves ICC 0.798-0.840 across three architecturally distinct judges and Cohen's d > 1.5 across all control conditions. Multi-dimensional sub-score analysis quantifies the contextual adaptability gap between rule-based and LLM-based systems, revealing that multi-task integration improves contextual relevance by 9.1% over rule-based baselines. Ablation experiments demonstrate that each framework component contributes to contextual relevance, with sub-score decomposition revealing gains that aggregate scoring masks. Driver emotion recognition is identified as the most critical upstream factor, and compact local LLMs (7B--9B parameters) achieve quality superior to API-based models, providing practical design guidelines for in-vehicle deployment.

Mixed autonomy driving becomes unsafe and inefficient when autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) misread each other's intentions. We study this problem as implicit mutual communication in lane changes. The proposed framework models how the ego vehicle both expresses its intent and probes the other driver's preference under epistemic uncertainty. It combines a level-k Bayesian persuasion game with virtual features for proactive signaling, information-theoretic rewards for mutual communication, and adaptive weights of communication affordances. We further introduce the Pride-Inquiry (P-I) and Pride-Prejudice (P-P) planes to analyze communication intensity and tendency. The model is calibrated with a Communication-Based Multi-Agent Inverse Reinforcement Learning algorithm (C-MIRL) on the naturalistic NGSIM dataset. Compared with the non-communicative baseline, the proposed model reduces the prediction error of mandatory lane changes by up to 20% while maintaining strong generalization. Driver-In-the-Loop questionnaire scores are positively correlated with the calibrated communication variables, supporting the subjective validity of the model. The learned rewards further show that inquiry and listening affordances contribute more than pride and expression alone, and that inquiry preference varies more strongly across drivers. These results support explicit modeling of mutual communication and epistemic uncertainty in interactive driving.

Lane-change prediction is a central task in intelligent vehicles, where early maneuver anticipation can support safer decision-making. However, many existing approaches mainly learn statistical associations between observed driving variables and future maneuvers, while overlooking the causal dependencies among the input variables themselves. This limits interpretability, especially when physically related variables such as longitudinal gap, relative longitudinal velocity, and Time-To-Collision (TTC) are treated as independent flat inputs. This article presents a causal-inference-based framework for lane-change prediction and explanation. The proposed approach combines linguistic feature construction, expert-constrained causal discovery, deep structural causal modeling with Deep End-to-end Causal Inference (DECI), intervention-based effect analysis, refutation testing, and recursive causal-chain explanation. The objective is not only to predict the future maneuver, but also to identify candidate variables that directly contribute to the prediction, the upstream factors influencing them, and the causal chains through which these effects propagate. The framework achieves average F1-scores above 95% during the first three seconds before the lane-marking crossing event. Beyond prediction accuracy, the framework uses intervention-based effect analysis to distinguish influential from weakly influential variables under the learned causal structure. It further distinguishes candidate direct contributors from mediated effects and generates contrastive causal-chain explanations that clarify why the predicted maneuver is favored and why the alternative maneuvers are less supported. The main contribution is therefore a mechanism-aware lane-change prediction pipeline that moves beyond correlation-based classification toward more interpretable causal reasoning for maneuver prediction.

Autonomous driving is full of tiny social negotiations: a driver presses forward, another yields, a pedestrian fakes toward the curb, or a lane vehicle chooses whether to open a merge gap. Such interactions require inferring hidden intent from behavior under partial observability and then acting safely and efficiently. Existing autonomous-driving language benchmarks mostly focus on perception, visual question answering, or open-loop planning, while existing language-agent negotiation benchmarks typically make the negotiation explicit in text. Self-Driving Negotiator bridges the gap between the two: a text-only, multi-turn, procedurally generated environment for measuring implicit social coordination in driving. Agents generate specific driving actions. Reward and diagnostics are computed from the privileged simulator state, not from the explanation of the model. This report covers task design, reward and anti-gaming invariants, validated scenarios, non-LLM baselines, and a six-model inference leaderboard. Current models are far removed from the scripted expert. The best average success rate across three scenarios is 0.68; contested merge is statistically flat across models; and difficulty tiers separate cue-following from true wait-for-commitment behavior.

Reliable return navigation remains an important challenge in GPS-denied environments where external positioning infrastructure may be unavailable or unreliable. This paper presents ForestBack, an infrastructure-free pedestrian return navigation framework based on breadcrumb-based pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR). The system records a user's walking route as a sequence of reversible breadcrumb nodes and generates reverse-path guidance without requiring GPS, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth beacons, or pre-installed infrastructure. ForestBack integrates acceleration-based step detection, adaptive step-length estimation, magnetometer-assisted heading estimation, barometric-altitude correction, and bidirectional breadcrumb path reconstruction. The system was evaluated using an indoor obstacle-avoidance route with five checkpoints, where the user navigated around a central obstacle. A dataset of 36 walking trials and 42,474 time-series samples was used for evaluation, including IMU signals, magnetometer readings, barometric variables, turn-event labels, ground-truth trajectories, baseline PDR outputs, proposed ForestBack outputs, and power-related measurements. Experimental results show that ForestBack reduced the mean RMSE from 1.129 m to 0.965 m compared with traditional PDR, corresponding to a 15.76% improvement. The mean final-position error was reduced from 1.781 m to 1.388 m, while turn-event detection consistency reached approximately 99.90%. These results indicate that ForestBack improves trajectory reconstruction and route-preserving return guidance in obstacle-avoidance scenarios. The released dataset and analysis notebook support reproducibility and future benchmarking of infrastructure-free PDR-based return navigation systems.

Safety certification of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) driving planners under ISO 21448 (SOTIF) rests on an Operational Design Domain (ODD) specification that answers two complementary questions: when does the planner start to fail, and how severely does it fail once it does? We evaluate Alpamayo R1, a 10B-parameter open-weight driving VLA, on 15,968 (clip, attack) pairs. We find a conservative-aggregate gap: an aggregate safe threshold of $σ\leq 50$ under a 15% average displacement error (ADE) budget masks well-sampled scenarios that tolerate the top of the tested grid ($σ= 70$). A Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) on the changed-explanation subset identifies six discrete severity bands (BIC-optimal $k{=}6$), so two perturbation conditions with the same mean error can differ materially in their share of high-severity (C4/C5) failures. Joining the two analyses on the same corpus surfaces a finding neither yields in isolation: the scenarios with the loosest noise thresholds are not those with the lowest high-severity rate: STOP_SIGNAL concentrates roughly $4\times$ the C4/C5 share of LANE_KEEPING despite tolerating a larger $σ$. A deployable SOTIF ODD specification for driving VLAs therefore requires a two-dimensional safety envelope, not a single aggregate value per hazard.

We present NOVA, an autonomous symbolic regression framework that identifies interpretable car-following and lane-change structures from raw trajectory data with minimal behavioral priors. Applied to 4,765,788 active driving observations from the NGSIM I-80 and US-101 datasets, NOVA's deterministic Rust-powered search engine evaluates over 10,000 candidate algebraic structures and identifies a compact two-term acceleration model under a forward-shifted rolling-mean prediction target. Evaluated under two complementary preprocessing pipelines, NOVA achieves $RMSE = 1.376 m/s^2$ ($R^2 = 15.57\%$) on the intent-forecasting benchmark, outperforming the best recalibrated symbolic-regression baseline (SR-LLM, PNAS~2025) by 0.135 m/s$^2$ in RMSE under an identical evaluation protocol. Across eight independent experiments, a single dominant nonlinear term emerges as a robust backbone of human car-following; a residual-guided extension further links the selected structure to an established psychophysical theory of collision avoidance. The discovered feature operators transfer zero-shot between freeway sites with under 3 pp $R^2$ loss. Extended to lane-change modelling within a multinomial logit framework, NOVA achieves 67.4% balanced accuracy under strict vehicle-ID holdout on 502 unseen drivers, surpassing existing lane-changing baselines by +29.8 percentage points on a three-class problem.

Temporary work-zone speed limits are communicated through visually inconsistent signage and are often missing from digital maps, creating safety risks for human drivers and automated vehicle systems. We present a real-time, onboard perception pipeline that detects active work zones, recognizes associated temporary speed limits, and outputs a law-aware work-zone state and speed value suitable for driver alerts or downstream automated control. The system fuses object detections with semantic verification and temporally smoothed, hysteresis-based state transitions to reduce false activations and flicker in dynamic scenes, and runs fully on low-cost embedded hardware. Evaluated manually on a annotated subset of the ROADWork dataset (490 sequences), the system achieves inside-work-zone event-level recall of 96.5% and event-level precision of 68.7%. Speed-limit recognition evaluated on 35 minutes of in-house driving data attains 95.45% precision and 53.85% recall, with no incorrect speed classifications and a single false positive. These results demonstrate a practical, scalable approach for grounding work-zone speed awareness directly in onboard perception rather than maps or infrastructure. We release our source code for the proposed system pipeline on our GitHub repository: https://github.com/Mi3-Lab/workzone

With the evolution of large foundation models (LFMs), data-driven autonomous driving has made significant strides. However, existing paradigms still face severe challenges in complex interaction and long-tail scenarios due to distribution shift and causal confusion. These limitations often result in a lack of human-level decision-making flexibility and safety in extreme conditions. To overcome this limitation, this paper proposes a Human-in-the-Loop Online Behavior Cloning frame work (HiL-OBC) for autonomous driving, which aims to deeply integrate the cross-modal perceptual capabilities of LFMs with the high-level driving intelligence of human experts. Specifically, HiL-OBC deployment is executed through three critical phases: policy initialization with human intervention, latent behavioral modeling with Bayesian policy adaptation, and online deploy ment and updates. Furthermore, we design a Multi-modal Online Behavior Cloning (MOBC) model, which optimizes the base driving policy online through a lightweight network architecture, a takeover trigger mechanism, and a multi-variant loss function, thereby enhancing the system's decision-making robustness in complex environments. We evaluated the HiL-OBC on the LangAuto-Human CARLA benchmark. Experimental results demonstrate that the driving policies optimized via the human-in-the-loop mechanism achieve substantial performance gains: the DS of StructNav, LFG, and LMDrive increased by 47.25%, 31.59%, and 32.12%, respectively, with a simultaneous of various experimental settings and key components highlights the advantages of human-in-the-loop learning in improving decision-making robustness and overall driving performance.

Vision-language driving models increasingly use reasoning supervision to bridge perception, prediction, and planning, but existing driving rationales are often free-form and expensive to generate with frontier models. We present VeriDrive, a framework for constructing planning-oriented, verifiable counterfactual supervision. VeriDrive converts driving reasoning into a structured Perception-Evaluation-Revision chain that grounds key objects in future motion, evaluates alternative ego trajectories with rule-checkable evidence, revises risky intent toward expert behavior, and produces final planning targets. To scale data construction, VeriDrive combines local generation with validator-guided selective correction, escalating only invalid or difficult samples. We build the VeriDrive dataset on nuScenes and train under the Omni-Q protocol. Controlled open-loop experiments show that VeriDrive improves L2, Collision, and Intersection over OmniDrive while reducing logged token usage, generation time, and actual paid LLM/VLM cost. These results show that auditable intermediate fields and structured revision targets can improve vision-language planning supervision under realistic annotation budgets. Code, prompts, and validator scripts are coming soon and will be released after the review process.

End-to-end autonomous driving models often struggle to balance multi-modal maneuver generation with real-time inference constraints. While diffusion models successfully capture diverse driving behaviors, their iterative denoising process incurs unacceptable latency for safety-critical deployment. To address this, we propose CLEAR (Cognition and Latent Evaluation for Adaptive Routing), a framework that combines ultra-fast generative planning with deep semantic reasoning. CLEAR employs Drive-JEPA as the visual encoder and replaces the multi-step denoising chain with a single-step conditional drift in a VAE latent space, introducing a conditioning coefficient to balance diversity and expert precision. Meanwhile, we fully fine-tune Qwen3.50.8B on driving QA pairs to extract scene-aware hidden states. These states guide both an Adaptive Scheduler, which selects the conditioning coefficient $α$ and sample count $N$ from a discrete set of predefined schemes, and a cross-attention scorer that selects the optimal trajectory from candidates. On the NAVSIM v1 benchmark, CLEAR achieves a state-of-the-art PDMS of 93.7. Our results demonstrate that high-fidelity, multi-modal planning can be executed efficiently without dense geometric annotations or iterative sampling.

Vision-language models (VLMs) for autonomous driving have shown promising performance, but their ability to handle region-specific traffic rules remains underexplored, raising uncertainties about their deployment across diverse global settings. We therefore introduce GeoDrive-Bench, a novel benchmark that enables the systematic investigation of VLMs' geo-culturally grounded driving reasoning. We curated 5,053 human-validated multiple-choice QA pairs across six countries covering diverse driving cultures. Specifically, we emphasize four driving tasks: perception, prediction, planning, and region reasoning. Each question requires models to infer the correct driving behavior from visual evidence and local traffic conventions without explicit country labels. Beyond evaluation, we further design a distillation algorithm that injects region-specific traffic-rule knowledge into the internal representations of VLMs, enabling models to better align visual scene understanding with local driving policies. Experiments on nine state-of-the-art VLMs show substantial performance variations across geo-driving cultures for each task, while our proposed baseline models exhibit improved geo-cultural reasoning across regions. These results suggest that current VLMs still lack robust region-aware driving intelligence and highlight GeoDrive-Bench as a diagnostic and training-oriented testbed for deployable autonomous driving foundation models.

Understanding subtle driver actions is essential for building reliable driver monitoring systems. Existing visionlanguage models (VLMs) are trained on general datasets and struggle to recognize fine distinctions in driver behaviors. This paper addresses this limitation by creating a detailed natural language version of the Drive&Act dataset. We evaluate three VLMs on our new benchmark using LLM-based scoring methods. Their performance on the new benchmark shows that they cannot reliably generate accurate fine-grained driver activity descriptions. Based on the labeled Drive&Act dataset we create a new Drive&Act description dataset containing finegrained descriptions to train VLMs on driver activity understanding. Cross dataset evaluation on the Driver Monitoring Dataset (DMD) shows that the VLM fine-tuned on our new Drive&Act description dataset generalizes well to actions in the DMD dataset. The VLM fine-tuned on our Drive&Act description dataset achieves an ACCR score of 76 outperforming the zero-shot VLM baseline with an ACCR score of 66. These findings demonstrate that adapting VLMs with richly described driver actions can significantly improve their ability to interpret driver behavior while also highlighting the need for more diverse datasets to support broader generalization in future applications. Our Drive&Act description dataset and code will be publicly available on GitHub.

End-to-End Autonomous Driving (E2E-AD) systems have largely converged on predicting intermediate trajectory waypoints, delegating final control to hand-crafted controllers with GPS access. Direct control-signal prediction (outputting throttle, steer and brake in an end-to-end fashion) remains underexplored, and critically, the role of action multimodality in such systems is not well understood. We argue that moving beyond deterministic, single-action outputs is not merely a modelling choice, but a key driver of driving performance, representational quality, and training stability. To validate this, we introduce the Action Diffusion Transformer (ADT), an anchor-free diffusion transformer trained with a MSE objective that natively models the multimodal distribution of plausible driving actions. Rather than committing to a single deterministic command, ADT generates K action candidates and selects the most suitable one at inference via Nearest Neighbour Matching (NNM). Beyond strong benchmark numbers, we show that action multimodality yields measurable benefits in learned representations and behavioral consistency, effects that deterministic architectures cannot replicate. ADT surpasses previous state-of-the-art on the challenging closed-loop Bench2Drive benchmark while achieving ten times lower latency, demonstrating that expressive, multimodal action modelling is both practically efficient and conceptually essential for robust end-to-end driving.

Interactive driving exposes a failure mode that is easy to miss in rule-aware autonomous-driving stacks: a hard-rule margin can be negative for an ego candidate even though a small lawful accommodation by a non-priority agent would restore feasibility. Existing rulebooks, shields, and reachability filters are strong at vetoing unsafe actions, while prediction-based planners model likely responses. Neither returns a runtime proof object that states which bounded multi-agent edit repairs the maneuver, who owns the edit, whether the request is right-of-way affordable, and what ego fallback remains if the request is not observed. We formulate this missing object as interactive repair certification and introduce CARVE, a prediction-free certificate layer over a finite lattice of ego-owned and agent-owned tactical operators. Agent-owned requests are admissible only inside $B_j(s) = β(π_j)α_j^{\max}(s)$, a cooperation envelope that separates kinematic reachability from normative priority. The resulting certificate records the binding rule, repair category, repair set, responsibility-weighted cost split, and fallback. On 589 Lanelet2-geometry-grounded INTERACTION replay episodes, CARVE-Greedy accepts 98.64% of initially vetoed maneuvers and recovers 370/378 human-resolved false vetoes, while preserving 589/589 right-of-way respect, zero priority-agent false positives, and 400/400 negative-stress vetoes. We prove certificate soundness, structural right-of-way respect, exact finite-lattice minimality, fallback contingency, and blame-consistency conditions. CARVE does not predict or require another driver's compliance; it certifies whether a proposed interaction is bounded, attributable, and normatively admissible under declared assumptions.

Recent end-to-end (E2E) autonomous driving policies achieve high driving scores in closed-loop simulations. Yet it remains unclear whether these policies handle common safety-critical scenarios. We present Safe2Drive (S2D), a set of Bench2Drive-aligned scenario extensions focused on three frequent families of road hazards: work zones, pedestrian jaywalking, and occluded vulnerable road users (VRUs). Safe2Drive adds 100 common but challenging scenarios and introduces SafeDriving Score (SDS), a safety-centric metric that augments prior evaluators with pre-crash braking, work zone-object contact, lane centering, and smoothness checks. Evaluating two state-of-the-art policies (LEAD and SimLingo) on S2D, we find that their driving scores drop sharply relative to their reported Bench2Drive baselines (LEAD: from 94.70 DS on Bench2Drive to 39.95 DS on S2D; SimLingo: from 85.07 DS on Bench2Drive to 41.00 DS on S2D) and that SDS on S2D is low (11.85 for LEAD and 15.27 for Sim-Lingo). These results are consistent with brittle safe-driving behaviors such as poor work-zone understanding, red-light violations, and late or absent braking for pedestrians. This study highlights a lack of safe behavioral reasoning in E2E models even when tested on CARLA towns that are part of the training set. We plan to release the code and videos for all 100 S2D scenarios.

Alcohol-impaired driving remains a major yet preventable cause of road traffic injury and death, with many drivers underestimating their level of intoxication. Compared to in-vehicle systems, mobile drunk-driving detection using consumer smartwatches offers a scalable way to trigger preventive interventions and increase awareness without additional in-vehicle hardware. We introduce a system that leverages wrist accelerometer data and heart rate variability-derived physiological signals to detect alcohol-related driving impairment. We collected data in a randomized, controlled three-arm test-track study (n=54) and trained both logistic regression models with window-aggregated features and a two-tower 1D convolutional neural network (CNN), to detect alcohol-impaired driving. The CNN achieved a participant-averaged area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.88 for detecting any alcohol intoxication and 0.86 for detecting driving above the WHO-recommended limit of 0.05 g/dL. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to (1) demonstrate drunk-driving detection using consumer smartwatches, (2) develop and evaluate such a system in a real vehicle on a closed test track, and (3) rigorously assess generalization to unseen participants. Together, these findings highlight the potential of wearable-based sensing to support scalable, measurement-driven prevention of alcohol-related traffic harm.

Aggressive driving is a major cause of traffic accidents and poses a serious threat to road safety. Although deep learning methods have shown promising results in detecting risky driving behaviours from vehicle sensor data, their performance in real-world conditions is often limited by severe data imbalance, large variability between drivers, and the lack of physically interpretable vehicle dynamics representations. In this paper, we propose an enhanced deep learning framework for aggressive driving detection using multivariate vehicle dynamics signals. Instead of relying solely on raw measurements, the proposed approach constructs engineered dynamic features that capture steering, acceleration, and braking behaviour. To address the extreme rarity of aggressive events in naturalistic driving data, we introduce a stable training strategy that combines controlled SMOTE-based oversampling with a class-weighted loss formulation, and evaluates focal loss variants for imbalance handling. Furthermore, a safety-oriented decision strategy based on class-specific threshold calibration is adopted to better reflect the asymmetric risks of missed detections and false alarms in real-world applications. The proposed framework is evaluated on a newly collected naturalistic driving dataset. Extensive experiments show that the proposed method consistently outperforms standard deep learning baselines with significant improvements in minority-class recall and safety-critical F-score metrics while maintaining practical computational efficiency. Code: \url {https://github.com/halhamdan/CBANet}

Surrogate Safety Measures (SSMs) are extensively utilised in the evaluation of traffic risk in automated driving contexts. However, the majority of SSM-based evaluations employ fixed thresholds that fail to capture the human response to sustained borderline conditions or the reaction to brief, high-risk peaks. The present work proposes a biologically inspired reinterpretation of SSM thresholds. This is modelled as spiking thresholds of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons, with multiple SSM inputs combined into a spiking neural network (SNN). The SNN is trained to emit spikes that are aligned with human braking onsets. The training data was recorded in a controlled car-following experiment using the 3D-CoAutoSim platform with CARLA/Unreal and a 6-DOF motion platform, where induced critical events were generated. The results demonstrate that the learned spiking activity qualitatively aligns with braking behaviour across scenarios and captures reactions that are not consistently explained by threshold crossings alone. Analysis across participants further indicates that learned input thresholds remain relatively consistent, while learned decay factors encode different temporal sensitivities for the SSMs. The findings of this study indicate that spiking dynamics may serve as a mechanism to facilitate the convergence of objective SSMs with subjective human safety perception.

We present the first systematic study of faithfulness in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) driving models, analyzing 300 Alpamayo-R1-10B inferences across 100 diverse PhysicalAI-AV scenarios. Our main finding is that output natural-language rationales with trajectories may be significantly unfaithful: (i) overall reasoning fidelity is only 42.5%, with Chain-of-Causation matching scene reality less than half the time; (ii) 94 missed pedestrians in one-third of pedestrian-relevant scenes; (iii) 97.7% trajectory fragility under mild visual perturbations; and (iv) only 48.3% mean reasoning-action consistency, with 53.3% of inferences exhibiting low consistency, including 37.9% of stop-claimed cases where the model continues instead. We formalize faithfulness information-theoretically, define entity and action fidelity with verification criteria, and outline a four-component safety architecture aligned with these results.

Modern pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) systems rely on fusing noisy and biased estimates of position, velocity, and calibrated orientation derived from loosely coupled sensors to determine the current pose of a localized object. However, discrepancies in the sampling rates of sensor-specific estimation methods and unreliable transmission pose significant challenges. And traditional methods often fail to effectively fuse multimodal sensor data during dynamic movements characterized by high accelerations, velocities, and rapidly varying orientations. To address these limitations, we propose a simple recurrent neural network (RNN) architecture capable of implicitly forecasting asynchronous sensor data streams from diverse estimation methods along reference trajectories. The proposed approach introduces PDRNN, a modular hybrid AI-assisted PDR system that handles each component as an independent ensemble of machine learning (ML) models to estimate both key parameter means and variances. Separate ML-based models are employed to estimate orientation, (un)directed velocity or distance from acceleration and gyroscope data, with optional absolute positioning from synchronized radio systems such as 5G for stabilization. A final fusion model combines these outputs, position, velocity, and orientation, while using uncertainty estimates to enhance system robustness. The modular design allows individual components to be updated, fine-tuned, or replaced without affecting the entire system. Experiments on dynamic sports movement data show that PDRNN achieves superior accuracy and precision compared to classic and ML-based methods, effectively avoiding error accumulation common in black-box approaches. And PDRNN offers forecast capabilities and better component control despite increased system complexity.

Closed-loop traffic simulation requires agents that are both scalable and behaviorally realistic. Recent self-play reinforcement learning approaches demonstrate strong scalability, but their equilibrium strategies fail to capture the socially aware behaviors of real human drivers. We propose a hierarchical architecture that goes beyond self-play by combining high-level multi-agent interaction reasoning with low-level continuous trajectory realization. Specifically, a Stackelberg-style Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) module generates interaction-aware intention commands. These commands condition a low-level continuous motion module, translating the strategic intent into physically consistent, scene-responsive control sequences. To mitigate distribution shift in closed-loop deployment, we introduce a hybrid co-training scheme combining MARL with auxiliary recovery supervision. Experiments on a SUMO-based urban network demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves superior control smoothness and safety compared to self-play and passive imitation baselines, while maintaining competitive traffic efficiency.

Gap-closing rate and visual looming swap discriminative dominance depending on deceleration intensity - a finding that reconciles a long-standing conflict in the car-following literature and challenges spacing-centered assumptions in traditional driver behavior models. This study presents a two-stage analytical framework that distinguishes between information availability (kinematic variables measurable in the environment) and information utilization (variables that demonstrably separate driver behavioral patterns), applied to 1,060,119 valid car-following observations from the NGSIM trajectory dataset (2,932 vehicles). Six kinematic features are extracted, and deceleration events are detected under two threshold conditions (-0.5 m/s^2 and -0.3 m/s^2). K-means clustering identifies behavioral modes, and one-way ANOVA with eta-squared effect sizes ranks each feature's discriminative power. Three key findings emerge: (1) threshold selection fundamentally shapes behavioral inference - the stricter threshold yields three interpretable modes while the permissive threshold collapses these to two; (2) hard braking prioritizes gap-closing rate (eta^2 = 0.715) while moderate braking emphasizes visual looming (eta^2 = 0.574); and (3) spacing headway is negligible (eta^2 <= 0.014) across both thresholds. These findings provide empirically grounded candidates for perceptual cue prioritization and have direct implications for ADAS warning system design and autonomous vehicle control.

Partial driving automation creates a tension: drivers remain legally responsible for vehicle behaviour, yet their active control is significantly reduced. This reduction undermines the engagement and sense of agency needed to intervene safely. Meaningful human control (MHC) has been proposed as a normative framework to address this tension. However, empirical methods for evaluating whether existing systems actually provide MHC remain underdeveloped. In this study, we investigated the extent to which drivers experience MHC when interacting with partially automated driving systems. Twenty-four drivers completed a simulator study involving silent automation failures under two modes - haptic shared control (HSC) and traded control (TC). We derived behavioural metrics from telemetry data, subjective perception scores from post-trial surveys and used them to test hypothesised relations between them derived from the properties of systems under MHC. The confirmatory analysis showed a significant negative correlation between the perception of the automated vehicle (AV) understanding the driver and conflict in steering torques. An exploratory analysis also revealed a surprising positive correlation between reaction times and the perception of sufficient control. Qualitative feedback from open-ended post-experiment questionnaires revealed that mismatches in intentions between the driver and automation, lack of safety, and resistance to driver inputs contribute to the reduction of perceived MHC, while subtle haptic guidance aligned with driver intent had a positive effect. These findings suggest that future designs should prioritise effortless driver interventions, transparent communication of automation intent, and context-sensitive authority allocation to strengthen meaningful human control in partially automated driving.

Recent advances in vision language action (VLA) models have shown remarkable potential for autonomous driving by directly mapping multimodal inputs to control signals. However, previous VLA-based methods have not explicitly exploited the critic capability of VLAs to refine driving decisions, even though such capability has been well demonstrated in other LLM-based domains, thereby limiting their performance in complex closed-loop scenarios. In this work, we present a theoretically inspired two-stage framework, CriticVLA, which extends the role of VLAs from acting to judging. CriticVLA first generates a rough trajectory and then refines it through multimodal evaluation and single-step optimization guided by a VLA-based critic, yielding higher-quality driving behaviors. To support this process, we construct a large-scale synthetic dataset of 12.9 million annotated trajectories covering diverse driving scenarios, which enhances the critic's reasoning and refinement abilities. Extensive closed-loop experiments on the Bench2Drive benchmark show that CriticVLA significantly surpasses state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a 73.33% total success rate and delivering about 30% improvement in challenging scenarios.

We present the Field of Safe Motion (FSM), a quantitative safety model for determining whether a driver maintains a collision-free escape route, or "out," at any given moment by accounting for that driver's physical capabilities and the foreseeable actions of other road users. The Field of Safe Travel (FST) provides a framework for representing the types of sensory information and actions available to drivers. However, the FST has remained conceptual in nature since its initial publication almost 90 years ago -- and a concrete computational operationalization is still lacking. At the same time, reachability analysis provides a quantitative basis for assessing the possible actions available to road users, using interpretable kinematic models, but reachability models have so far remained confined largely to the engineering and robotics literature. Bringing these two approaches together provides for an interpretable, quantitative tool for assessing driving behavior across a wide range of driving scenarios. Beyond being interpretable, our approach relies on a relatively small set of basic assumptions that are easy to enumerate and reason about. Furthermore, an interpretable reachability model paired with kinematic assumptions provides a way to bound uncertainty about road users' reasonably foreseeable future locations. We demonstrate the applicability of the FSM to different driving scenarios and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the model.

Inefficient driving behaviors, such as overly conservative yielding, remain a key obstacle to deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs). Instantaneous driving efficiency metrics are crucial for self-driving decision-making because they affect real-time performance evaluation and control optimization. However, commonly used indicators, including speed, relative speed, and inter-vehicle distance, are limited in capturing traffic context and in ensuring consistency between instantaneous outputs and travel-level outcomes. This study proposes the Projected Attainable Speed Space (PASS) model, a unified framework for driving efficiency assessment across instantaneous and travel-level analyses by integrating kinematic and spatial traffic information. PASS characterizes instantaneous driving efficiency with two coupled elements: potential for speed improvement (available acceleration space) and response to that potential (utilization of available acceleration space). Available acceleration space is referenced to projected attainable speed, derived from an idealized catch-up maneuver using relative speed and spacing to the leading vehicle; utilization is represented by the temporal change in available acceleration space. To ensure cross-scale consistency, time-aggregated PASS is defined as a travel-level efficiency metric. Trajectory data from a driving simulation experiment are used for parameter calibration to maximize agreement between time-aggregated PASS and observed travel times. Across 10 lane-change events, results show strong consistency, with an average coefficient of determination of 0.913, validating PASS for consistent efficiency evaluation across instantaneous and travel-level temporal scales. This study provides a unified, physically grounded framework that supports real-time decision-making and long-term performance analysis in autonomous driving.

This paper presents a personalized Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) energy consumption estimation framework that integrates map-based contextual features with driver-specific velocity prediction and physics-based energy consumption modeling. The system combines route selection, detailed road feature processing, a rule-based reference velocity generator, a PID controller-based vehicle dynamics simulator, and a Bidirectional LSTM model trained to reproduce individual driving behavior. The predicted individual-specific velocity profiles are coupled with a quasi-steady backward energy consumption model to compute tractive power, regenerative braking, and State-of-Charge (SOC) evolution. Evaluation across urban, freeway, and hilly routes demonstrates that the proposed approach captures key driver behavioral patterns such as deceleration at intersections, speed-limit tracking, and road grade-dependent responses, while producing accurate power and SOC trajectories. The results highlight the effectiveness of combining learned driver behavior with map-based context and physics-based energy consumption modeling to produce accurate, personalized BEV SOC depletion profiles.

Predicting driver intention from neurophysiological signals offers a promising pathway for enhancing proactive safety in advanced driver assistance systems, yet remains challenging in real-world driving due to EEG signal non-stationarity and the complexity of cognitive-motor preparation. This study proposes and evaluates an EEG-based driver intention prediction framework using a synchronised multi-sensor platform integrated into a real electric vehicle. A real-world on-road dataset was collected across 32 driving sessions, and 12 deep learning architectures were evaluated under consistent experimental conditions. Among the evaluated architectures, TSCeption achieved the highest average accuracy (0.907) and Macro-F1 score (0.901). The proposed framework demonstrates strong temporal stability, maintaining robust decoding performance up to 1000 ms before manoeuvre execution with minimal degradation. Furthermore, additional analyses reveal that minimal EEG preprocessing outperforms artefact-handling pipelines, and prediction performance peaks within a 400-600 ms interval, corresponding to a critical neural preparatory phase preceding driving manoeuvres. Overall, these findings support the feasibility of early and stable EEG-based driver intention decoding under real-world on-road conditions. Code: https://github.com/galosaimi/Mind2Drive.

Road traffic accidents are a leading cause of fatalities worldwide. In the US, human error causes 94% of crashes, resulting in excess of 7,000 pedestrian fatalities and $500 billion in costs annually. Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) with emergency collision avoidance systems that operate at the limits of vehicle dynamics at a high frequency, a dual constraint of nonlinear kinodynamic accuracy and computational efficiency, further enhance safety benefits during adverse weather and cybersecurity breaches, and to evade dangerous human driving when AVs and human drivers share roads. This paper parameterizes a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) collision avoidance policy Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) utilizing race car overtaking, without explicit geometric mimicry reference trajectory guidance, in simulation, with a physics-informed, simulator exploit-aware reward to encode nonlinear vehicle kinodynamics. Two policies are evaluated, a default uni-direction and a reversed heading variant that navigates in the opposite direction to other cars, which both consistently outperform a Model Predictive Control and Artificial Potential Function (MPC-APF) baseline, with zero-shot transfer to proportionally scaled hardware, across three intersection collision scenarios, at 31x fewer Floating Point Operations (FLOPS) and 64x lower inference latency. The reversed heading policy outperforms the default racing overtaking policy in head-to-head collisions by 30% and the baseline by 50%, and matches the former in side collisions, where both DRL policies evade 10% greater than numerical optimal control.

The ambulance service is the main transport for diseased or injured people which suffers the same acceleration forces as regular vehicles. These accelerations, caused by the movement of the vehicle, impact the performance of tasks executed by sanitary personnel, which can affect patient survival or recovery time. In this paper, we have trained, validated, and tested a system to assess driving in ambulance services. The proposed system is composed of a sensor node which measures the vehicle vibrations using an accelerometer. It also includes a GPS sensor, a battery, a display, and a speaker. When two possible routes reach the same destination point, the system compares the two routes based on previously classified data and calculates an index and a score. Thus, the index balances the possible routes in terms of time to reach the destination and the vibrations suffered in the patient cabin to recommend the route that minimises those vibrations. Three datasets are used to train, validate, and test the system. Based on an Artificial Neural network (ANN), the classification model is trained with tagged data classified as low, medium, and high vibrations, and 97% accuracy is achieved. Then, the obtained model is validated using data from three routes of another region. Finally, the system is tested in two new scenarios with two possible routes to reach the destination. The results indicate that the route with less vibration is preferred when there are low time differences (less than 6%) between the two possible routes. Nonetheless, with the current weighting factors, the shortest route is preferred when time differences between routes are higher than 20%, regardless of the higher vibrations in the shortest route.

Mobility in urban and interurban areas, mainly by cars, is a day-to-day activity of many people. However, some of its main drawbacks are traffic jams and accidents. Newly made vehicles have pre-installed driving evaluation systems, which can prevent accidents. However, most cars on our roads do not have driver assessment systems. In this paper, we propose an approach for recognising driving styles and enabling drivers to reach safer and more efficient driving. The system consists of two physical sensors connected to a device node with a display and a speaker. An artificial neural network (ANN) is included in the node, which analyses the data from the sensors, and then recognises the driving style. When an abnormal driving pattern is detected, the speaker will play a warning message. The prototype was assembled and tested using an interurban road, in particular on a conventional road with three driving styles. The gathered data were used to train and validate the ANN. Results, in terms of accuracy, indicate that better accuracy is obtained when the velocity, position (latitude and longitude), time, and turning speed for the 3-axis are used, offering an average accuracy of 83%. If the classification is performed considering just two driving styles, normal and aggressive, then the accuracy reaches 92%. When the geo-information and time data are included, the main novelty of this paper, the classification accuracy is improved by 13%.